No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

La Crescenta Healthcare Center

3050 Montrose Ave, La Crescenta, CA 91214 · For profit - Partnership · 92 certified beds · (818) 957-0850 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$17,122 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,122 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-10)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
3001 Foothill Blvd · (818) 541-7840 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4050 La Crescenta Ave · (818) 957-5687 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3901 Dunsmore Ave · (818) 249-5940 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3210 Honolulu Ave · (818) 957-2755

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.382.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.541.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.5%CMS range 36.5–50.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 9.7–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.8–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
34.4%
Total nursing turnover
10.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 86.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-08)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and secured environment for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents/safety, who was identified at risk for elopement (when a person with cognitive [thought process] impairment leaves a safe area, such as a care facility or home, without awareness of the potential dangers), wandering (a person that roams around and becomes lost or confused about their location) out of the facility, and at risk for falls by failing to: 1. Implement care plan interventions to visually monitor hourly, and check whereabouts (the place where a person is located), of Resident 1, who had been assessed at Risk for Elopement and Falls which resulted in Resident 1 leaving without authorization or supervision during Resident 1's scheduled physician (Oncologist -a physician who has special training in diagnosing and treating cancer) appointment, outside the facility on 7/17/2025. 2. Ensure the facility staff communicated with the medical transport driver (Driver 1) and the Oncologist Office Staff of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents reviewed for accidents/hazards received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and injury for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a recent fall, and who was identified at high risk for falls upon admission on [DATE], by failing to:1. Ensure the facility communicated and provided awareness to licensed nurses (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVNs 1 and 2] and Registered Nurse [RN] 1) and certified nurse assistants (CNAs 1, 2, 3 and 4) that Resident 1 was identified as high risk for falls due to recent history of falls history of falls and interventions to visually monitor every hour, in accordance with the care plan for falls and the physician order.2. Ensure the Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNA - provides rehabilitative care to patients recovering from illnesses or injuries) check the fall risk visual identifiers (Red name band and/or red star on the room, bed, and wheelchair) for residents identified as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food brought into the facility from outside was labeled and stored appropriately for one of one sampled Resident refrigerator in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Food Brought from Outside the Facility. This failure had the potential to result in residents getting a foodborne illness such as food poisoning, since the food safety, freshness and ownership cannot be verified. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/8/2026 at 10:15 AM with the Infection Preventionist (IP) in the entero food supply room, an unlabeled white bag was in the refrigerator for Resident's personally supplied food. IP removed the bag stating there is no label identifying who the item belongs to or dates identifying when to throw the item away. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/8/2026 at 10:15 AM with the IP in the entero food supply room: three transparent bags with fruit one plastic purple water bottle one gallon container of Neopolitan ice cream one gallon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN, notice of transfer of potential financial liability usually paid by Medicare (a federal health insurance) but may not be paid for in this instance because it is not medically reasonable and necessary, or custodial care) to beneficiaries before the non-covered extended care items or services are provided by the facility for two of three sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 60) who were discharged from Medicare Part A and continue to live in the facility. 1.Resident 3 last covered day of Medicare Part A service was on 4/13/2026. 2. Resident 60 last covered day of Medicare Part A service was on 3/10/2026. This deficient practice had violated Resident 3 and Resident 60 and/or their responsible party (RP) the right to be informed about the right to appeal, and potentially not be aware of possible charges for services rendered that were not covered after their last Medicare Part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician to one of one sampled resident (Resident 14), who was not receiving oxygen due to NC (a flexible tube with two prongs that rest in the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen) was in a bag attached to an oxygen concentrator (a machine that takes air from the surroundings, extract oxygen and filter it into purified oxygen). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 14 not to receive adequate oxygenation that could lead to respiratory decompensation (when respiratory system fails to meet the body's oxygen and carbon dioxide needs, requiring immediate intervention like oxygen), shortness of breath (SOB) and respiratory distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute or chronic respiratory failure (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to one of five sampled residents (Resident 21) when the Social Service Designee (SSD) did not follow up to ensure Resident 21's Advance Directive (AD a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) and DPOA ( Durable Power of Attorney) provided by the resident's responsible party (RP) was for a health care and not for financial in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Advance Directives. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 21 receiving treatment against her wishes and placing Resident 21's safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), it indicated Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke - loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 85) did not store at the bedside that is accessible to other residents and visitor, and self-administer Albuterol Inhaler (medication used to quickly treat or prevent bronchospasms, including asthma symptoms (wheezing, tightness) and breathing difficulties) that was observed at Resident 85's bedside table in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure Medication Storage. Resident 85 stated, the Albuterol inhaler was given by her doctor and had been using it as needed every six hours when she had trouble breathing. Resident 85 did not have a Physician Order to administer the Albuterol inhaler. Resident 85 did not have an order for self-administration of the Albuterol inhaler. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 85 and other residents with access to the medication to have excessive dose of Albuterol inhaler that could result in tachycardia (heart rate that is too fast) that could lead to compromised health and wellbeing of the residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the code status (a medical order indicating what emergency treatments a resident wants or does not want if their heart or breathing stops) of one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) was for full code (in the event of the resident's heart stops beating or stops breathing, all life-saving measures such as CPR and intubation will be used to attempt to save a resident's life) in the resident's clinical record when Resident 5 chose selective treatments as indicated on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST actionable medical order signed by a doctor or medical provider that translates a seriously ill patient's end-of-life wishes). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 5 receiving treatment against her wishes. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) 3 performed hand hygiene for one of one sampled resident (Resident 50) after Registered Nurse (RN) 3 administered medications to Resident 50 via gastrostomy tube (GT) (a small tube placed through the belly directly into the stomach to provide nutrition, liquids, and medicines ) and then proceeded to administer eye drops (Artificial Tears) to Resident 50 on 5/7/2026. This deficient practice had the potential to transfer bacteria and/or virus (tiny germs that cause infections) from Resident 50's GT site to Resident 50's eyes.Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), attention to gastrostomy (a surgical procedure that creates a small, artificial opening through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach), diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program (a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of drugs used to treat infections, including antibiotics) for antibiotic use when two of five sampled residents (Residents 61 and 89) did not meet criteria for antibiotic use and facility did not report it to the attending physician. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving unnecessary antibiotics leading to antibiotic resistance (when bacteria evolve to survive and multiply despite the presence of antibiotic drugs designed to kill them). 1. During a review of Resident 61's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), it indicated Resident 61 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (any disease, damage, or malfunction that affects the brain's structure or function, resulting in an altered mental state), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible and within reach for one of six sampled residents (Resident 14), who was dependent with all activities of daily living (ADL), visually impaired, and a high risk for fall as indicated in the resident's care plan and facility's policy and procedures titled Call Lights-Answering Of. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 14 not able to call for assistance for ADL care, and in cases of emergency such as a fall with injury which can negatively affect Resident 14's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the AR indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute or chronic respiratory failure (the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or cannot remove carbon dioxide (a waste gas) from the blood), atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition where fat, cholesterol,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy for Medication Pass Guidelines and the professional standard of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 49) who received his scheduled 9 AM medications more than one hour late. This deficient practice had resulted in Resident 49, who also receives medication to lower blood pressure, felt frustrated, and had the potential for Resident 49 to have elevated blood pressure and not to optimize the effect of his drug therapy that could negatively affect Resident 49's quality of life Findings. A review of Resident 49's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a condition that affects nerves in your central nervous system, causes a range of symptoms like blurred vision and problems with how we move, think and feel), hypertension (high or raised blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's waste dumpsters cover were kept closed and not exposed to elements in the trash area. This failure had a potential to result in pest infestation [an increase in the numbers of a pest species (insect or small animal that is harmful, such as rats, mice, or cockroaches) in a given area], odors, unsanitary environment, and a spread of bacteria (small living things that could be dangerous and cause illnesses) and insects (small animals such as ants, and flies). Findings: During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 10:20 AM in the facility ' s trash area, the blue waste dumpster was overflowing with trash, and the lid was not closed. One of two facility ' s black waste dumpsters was not closed with lid. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 2:35 PM with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated, she was responsible to do the facility ' s round in the trash area to make sure the facility ' s waste dumpsters were closed and the area surrounding the trash area was clean. The ADM stated, she got a report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility ' s policy for Infection Control Program and Hand Hygiene for six of 16 sampled residents ' (Resident's 57, 35, 30, 66,41, and 64) during dinning observation in the Front Dining Room (FDR) by failing to ensure: 1. The Activity Director (AD) who was observed serving, preparing food trays and touching Resident's 57, 35 and 30 without performing hand hygiene before and after direct contact. 2. Director of Staff Development (DSD) was observed serving, preparing food trays and touching Resident's 66, 41 and 64 without performing hand hygiene before and after direct contact. This deficient practice had the potential to cause and/or spread infection (a process when a microorganism, such as bacteria, fungi, or a virus, enters a person's body and causes harm) in the facility. Finding: During a review of Resident 57's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 57 on 2/18/2022 with diagnoses that included cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the facility ' s dishwasher in operating condition to keep in a safe and efficient manner when the dishwasher failed the chlorine sanitizer (an effective, chlorine-based, substance or product used to reduce the number of harmful germs on all food contact surfaces to a safe level when cleaned and processed through an approved ware wash operation) test on 4/22/2025 at 9:05 AM. This failure had a potential to result in the facility ' s foodware (items used for containing, serving, or consuming prepared food, including cups, bowls, plates, etc.) and cookware (pots, pans, and other utensils used for cooking food) were not cleaned and sanitized, which could lead to a wide spread of foodborne illness (a condition that occurs when consuming contaminated food or beverages, which caused by the ingestion of harmful germs) within the facility ' s residents. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 9 AM with the Dishwasher Aid (DA 1) in the kitchen, the dishwasher ' s water temperature was at 120 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the facility ' s policy and procedure for self-administration of medications for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 75) when: 1. Resident 75 was not assessed prior to self-administration of medications. 2. Resident 75 was observed storing medications at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 75 and other resident who can have access to the medications to be at risk of harm from potential side effects or adverse effect (undesired effect of medication) that the medications could pose on Resident 75. Findings: A review of Resident 75 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right leg wound, left leg fracture (break in the bone), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 75 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/28/2024, indicated the resident does have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 75…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 33's admission Record, indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a gradual decline in mental ability usually caused by a brain disease), Parkinson's disease a brain disorder in which there is a lack of the chemical messenger dopamine, which helps control muscle movement; leads to muscle stiffness, weakness, and trembling), and osteoarthritis (inflammation of the joints due to the breakdown of the cartilage lining the bones in joints). A review of Resident 33's H&P, dated 11/27/2024, indicated the resident has a history of fractures (a break in a bone). The H&P also indicated the resident has a history of mental illness. A review of Resident 33's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 33 has severely impaired cognition (the ability to think and process information). The MDS also indicated that the resident is dependent on activities such as toileting and bathing and required substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 32's refusal to have the long nails with fungal infection and for podiatric (a physician specialized in foot treatment) treatment on 7/13/2024, 8/24/2024, 10/24/2024 and 1/7/2025 (total 4 days). This deficient practice had a potential result in Resident 32's inadequate and incomplete provision of care and result in worsened foot infection and pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia (a condition characterized by persistent, severe facial pain that can develop after a shingles [a viral infection that causes a painful, blistering rash that typically appears on one side of the body] outbreak), secondary parkinsonism (a condition where symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease [like tremors,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and treatments in accordance with the professional standards of practice, care plan goals, physician's order and the facility's policy and procedure for one of one sample residents (Resident 78) who was observed without oxygen for more than 30 minutes, while pulse oximeter reading (a measure of how much oxygen is carried by red blood cells in the blood, expressed as a percentage, with a normal range being 95-100%) decreased to 85%. The Physician ordered Resident 78 to receive oxygen at 2 liters (standard unit used to measure the rate of oxygen flow) as needed for shortness of breath or oxygen saturation less than 93 percent. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 78 to experience hypoxia (not enough oxygen is available to meet the needs of the body's cells) and/or respiratory distress (difficulty breathing), hospitalization and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 78's admission Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or (5%) or less during medication pass for two of four residents (Residents 28 and 237) in which three (3) medication errors were identified out of 30 opportunities which yielded a cumulative error rate of 10 %. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 checked the heart rate of Resident 237 prior to the administration of Hydrochlorothiazide (medication that lowers the blood pressure and heart rate) and Verapamil (medication ordered to manage hypertension [HTN- elevated blood pressure]) LVN 1 verified the dosage of Cyanocobalamin B12 (a vitamin supplement) according to the physician's order, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the medication available prior to administration of of to Resident 28's. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 237's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease (the build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four observed residents (Residents 237) was free from any significant medication errors when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not check the heart rate of Resident 237 prior to the administration of Hydrochlorothiazide (medication that lowers the blood pressure and heart rate) and Verapamil (medication ordered to manage hypertension [HTN- elevated blood pressure]). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident have dangerously decreased blood pressure and heart rate that could result in hospitalization and death. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 237's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (the build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the walls of blood vessels) and history of falls. A review of Resident 237's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/17/2025, indicated the resident has a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for medication storage when one out of three medication carts was found to have 2 insulin pens (medication to control the blood sugar), belonging to Resident 72, that were not discarded within 28 days from the opened date. This deficient practice had the potential for staff to administer the insulin pens, which may less efficacy and could lead to the mismanagement of the blood sugar of Resident 72. Findings: A review of Resident 72's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar or blood glucose control and poor wound healing) and hyperlipidemia (elevated blood cholesterol). A review of Resident 72's History and Physical (H&P), dated [DATE], indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. The H&P also indicated the resident has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplement and food products for two out of three stored in the medication carts were labeled with expiration date, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential for facility staff to administer the food products to residents, which could cause foodborne illnesses (a disease caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages. These contaminations can be from bacteria, viruses, parasites, or harmful chemicals that can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/2025 at 11:00 AM with Minimum Data Set Nurse (MN), Medication Cart (MC) 3 was examined. The bottom drawer of MC 3 was observed to have a 237 mL carton of Ensure Plus that was opened and undated. MN stated the carton of Ensure Plus did not have any markings that indicated the date it was used and for which resident the Ensure Plus was ordered for. MN stated it must be thrown away because it could be expired, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt attempts were made to resolve grievances brought by resident representative (Family [FM] 1) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the facility, and reports/resolution was signed and made available to the resident or FM 1, in accordance to the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Grievances and Complaints. This deficient practice violated the resident ' s right to have their grievance properly addressed and resulted in care that did not align with the resident ' s wishes/preferences. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction ( when blood flow to the brain is blocked) , cardiac pacemaker( a small medical device implanted in the chest to regulate abnormal heart rhythms) and Atrial fibrillation ( irregular heartbeat). The AR indicated FM 1 is Resident 1 ' s responsible party. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement the resident ' s care plan to wear protective clothing and/or Geri sleeves to protect skin due to pinching/scratching self and/or when agitated for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice may have the potential to compromise quality of life, unmet care needs, increased risk of health decline and emotional and psychological distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction ( when blood flow to the brain is blocked) , cardiac pacemaker( a small medical device implanted in the chest to regulate abnormal heart rhythms) and Atrial fibrillation ( irregular heartbeat). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical dated, 4/18/2024, indicated Resident 1 had a diagnosis of dementia. The H&P indicated Resident 1 had fair rehabilitation potential and confused. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) by failing to ensure medications were administered by licensed personnel only, in accordance the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Medication Pass Guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to result in serious harm, including the risk of injury to the resident due to medication errors that could have occurred. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses that included Peripheral vascular disease( a condition where the blood vessels outside the heart and brain become narrowed or blocked), paraplegia ( paralysis affecting one half of the body) and cardiomegaly( an abnormal enlargement of the heart, leading to high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 3 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/3/2024, the H&P indicated resident had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan with individualized interventions that included the dementia (a disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorder, Personality changes, and impaired reasoning) care needs with behavioral issues for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), in accordance with the resident ' s care plans written for dementia and ADL functional /Rehabilitation and the facility ' s policy & procedures (P&P) titled Behavioral Symptoms Associated with Dementia Management. Resident 1 manifested increased in behavior/agitation when care was rendered by registry staff of certain ethnicity as requested and repeatedly filed through the facility ' s grievance process. The facility failed to assess and implement resident centered interventions to address the root cause of Resident 1 ' s increased in behavior symptoms when care was provided by registry staff of certain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the prescribed diet order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1, who is on a very low- carbohydrate, double protein, 1200- calorie diet, did not receive meals in accordance with correct order and prescribed portion sizes. This deficient practice resulted in an unintentional weight gain (not on purpose) , potentially delaying recovery from illness or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction ( when blood flow to the brain is blocked) , cardiac pacemaker( a small medical device implanted in the chest to regulate abnormal heart rhythms) and Atrial fibrillation ( irregular heartbeat). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical dated, 4/18/2024, indicated Resident 1 had a diagnosis of dementia. The H&P indicated Resident 1 had fair rehabilitation potential and confused.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a personal safety alarm (PSA: any physical or electronic device that monitors resident movement and alerts the staff when movement is detected) was placed on one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) bed, who was assessed as a high risk for fall, in accordance to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Personal Safety Alarm. This deficient practice had the potential for a delayed response from facility staff when Resident 1 attempted to get out of bed unassisted, potentially resulting in falls. Findings: During areview of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer ' s disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), history of pelvis fracture, history of falling, and osteoporosis (a bone disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote resident rights for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when LVN 1, CNA 2, and CNA 3, continue to change Resident 1 ' s diaper after Resident 1 refused to be changed. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 ' s right hand accidentally hit the bedrail (metal or plastic bars positioned along the side of a bed, also commonly known as side rails) and caused bruising (an injury in which the skin is not broken but is discolored from the breaking of small blood vessels that lie underneath the skin) to the back of the right hand and right wrist area. Findings: A review of Resident 1s admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limit to, cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food tray was served timely for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4, who was in the dining room, lunch tray was delivered at 1:00 P (scheduled meal service was 12:15 PM). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the palatability of the food (quality of being tasty or acceptable in some other way), attractiveness and temperature which could decrease food intake and affect Resident 4 ' s nutritional health (the adequate provision of vitamins, minerals, fiber, water carbohydrates, proteins, fats and other micronutrients to cells and organisms, to support life). Findings: A review of Resident 4 ' s admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limit to autonomic neuropathy (damage to the nerves that control automatic body functions), vitamin D deficiency (inadequate amounts of vitamin D in your body) and muscle wasting (decrease in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report immediately, but not later than 2 hours, all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source to the California Department of Public Health for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with increased bruising on the left flank area and new fractures of the ribs on 6/1/24. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 and other residents in the facility to be subject from possible abuse in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/25/24 with diagnoses that included fracture (broken bone) of sacrum (injuries that involve sacral lateral to the foramina (based of the skull), fracture of first and fifth lumbar vertebra (lower back), and thrombocytopenia (a condition in which you have low blood platelet count). A review of Resident 1 ' s the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 3/31/24, indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive skill (mental action or process of acquiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse (food waste, scraps) properly by not covering three of three metal dumpsters (large trash container designed to be emptied into a truck) due to overflowing garbage bags leaving more than 5 trash bags, broken sofa, broken chair, and boxes on the ground next to the dumpster. This deficient practice had a potential to attract birds, flies, insects, pest and possibly spread infection to 87 of 87 facility residents and staffs in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/2024 at 8:30 AM, three metal dumpsters were not covered due to overflowing garbage bags leaving more than 5 trash bags, broken sofa, broken chair, and boxes on the ground next to the dumpster. During a concurrent observation of the dumpster area located at the back of the facility and with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) accompanied by Maintenance Supervisor (MS) dated 4/22/2024 at 8:50 AM. HS and MS stated the three-metal dumpster are overflowing with trash bags. HS stated, the three-metal dumpster should not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Advance Directives (AD-a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate his/her needs to the doctor) and the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST: medical order forms that indicate to the medical staff what to do in an event of medical emergency) were offered and/or obtained and accessible in the residents medical records for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 187, 30, 25 & 74). The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident's 187 Advance Directive acknowledgement form was not located in the paper chart and POLST was not completed. 2. Resident's 30, 25, and 74 medical records did not include and Advance Directive acknowledgement form. This deficient practice had the potential for residents' medical treatment provisions to not be carried out, according to the resident's request during emergency situations and/or when a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments and services for three out of six sampled residents (Residents 68, 25, and 17) at risk for decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and mobility by failing to: 1a. Provide Resident 68 with Restorative Nursing Aide program (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatments for passive range of motion (PROM, movement at a given joint with full assistance from another person) exercises on both lower extremities (BLE, hip, knee, ankle, feet) five (5) times a week as ordered. 1b. Provide Resident 68 with RNA treatments to apply both knee extension splint (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint to keep the knee in straight position) for three (3) hours or as tolerated once a day 5 times a week. 1c. Follow physician RNA treatment orders to apply both knee extension splints for maximum of three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to insure resident's safety through implementation and fire prevention interventions. by identifying and eliminating fire and environmental hazard for two of twelve sampled residents (Residents 35 and 288) by failing to ensure heating units ( a machine used that provide heat in the room) were free and clear of potentially flammable ( materials that can cause fire) items. This deficient practice had a potential to result in a fire that could lead to burns, injury and death to the facility staffs, residents and visitors. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 35s' admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 35 on 3/29/2024, with diagnoses that included myocardial infarction (heart attack or interruption of blood flow in the heart) and angina (chest pain), A review of Resident 35's History and physical, dated 4/20/24, indicated the resident has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Residents 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 3/18/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the activities recorded in the Controlled Drug Records (the accountability record or count sheet for narcotics) had corresponding administration documentations in residents' electronic medication administration records (eMAR) for two (2) of 29 sampled residents (Residents 46 & 64). 2. Ensure there was a policy, developed and implemented, for the accurate usage of the Emergency Medication Supplies (E-kit). There were missing entries in the E-kit logbook. These deficient practices had the potential for drug diversion (medical and legal concept involving the transfer of any legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use) and/or medication errors. Findings: 1. On 4/23/24 at 2:55 PM, during an observation at of Medication (med) Cart 2 with a Registered Nurse (RN 3), there was a bottle of morphine (an opioid and a potent treatment for pain) concentrate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 3 medication carts were locked when left unattended in the hallway. Registered Nurse 2 (RN2) prepared the medication and did not lock the medication cart before entering the resident ' s room. These deficient practices had the potential to result in misuse or medication loss by providing the unauthorized staff or person an opportunity to access resident ' s medications. Findings: On 4/23/24 at 8:56 AM during an interview, the registered nurse (RN 2) stated the facility has 2 nursing stations and 3 medication carts. On 4/23/24 at 9 AM during an observation, there was a medication Cart (med cart 1) located outside of a resident room, in the hallway which was accessible by other residents, visitors, and staff. RN 2 finished preparing medications and entered the resident's room without locking the med cart; thus, leaving the med cart unattended in the hallway. On top of the med cart, there were 7 over-the-counter medication bottles on top of the med cart and 1 bubble pack (a blister pack that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency and skills sets to carry out functions of the food and nutrition service by failing to: a. Staff failed to demonstrate and verbalize the correct procedures in testing the chlorine (a chemical used for disinfectant) for low temperature dish machine. b. Staff failed to verbalize and follow the manufacturer ' s guidelines of QT-40 test strips (a type of test strip) when checking the Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (Quats, a group of chemicals used to disinfect surfaces and equipment) sanitizer concentration. c. Staff failed to verbalize proper cooling procedures of food. These failures had a potential to result to potential cross-contamination (a transfer of bacteria from one object to another), ineffective dish machine, unsanitized food preparation areas and bacterial growth to food that could lead to food borne illness (an illness caused by contaminated food and beverages) in 85 of 85 medically compromised residents who received food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the menu for 32 of 85 residents on Regular texture diet (diet that has no restriction in texture and consistency) by not following the portion size for paprika chicken based on the facility ' s menu spread sheet. This deficient practice placed the facility residents at risk of unintended (not done on purpose) weight gain or weight loss and not meeting the physician ' s diet orders causing delay of recovery from illness or injury. Findings: During an observation of the lunch tray line (an area where resident ' s food was assembled) on 4/23/2024 at 12:07 PM, pieces of the chicken in the steam well were not consistent in size, some were small, and some were big for a three (3) ounces (oz, a unit of measurement) size. During a concurrent observation of the weight of the chicken and interview with [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2 on 4/23/2024 at 12:35 PM, [NAME] 1 stated, their practice was to serve 2 small pieces of the chicken as a serving. [NAME] 1 weigh 2 small chicken pieces using a facility weighing scale and it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure and standard of practice by failing to ensure: 1. Equipment and kitchen cleanliness were maintained: a. Three of 3 storage racks had rust-looking discoloration and stained in the walk-in refrigerator. b. Storage rack where bananas were stored in the preparation area had dust and dirt buildup. c. Storage container for ketchup, mix jelly, creamer and yellow cake mix had food and dirt residue. d. Dry storeroom floors had dirt debris. e. Kitchen hood had grease and dirt buildup. f. Three of 3 vent by the tray line area (food preparation area in which food trays travel around the production line) had dirt buildup. 2. Ensure measures to prevent cross-contamination was maintained: a. Two (2) dented cans were found in the dry storage area and emergency supply room. b. Scoop and tong handles were not stored in one direction. c. Pots and pans were stacked wet. d. Staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent for psychotropic/psychotherapeutic (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) drugs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 39) who was prescribed Sertraline (medication used to treat depression [a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]), and Divalproex (medication used to treat certain types of seizures (epilepsy) and mood disorder (a disorder manifested by severe feeling of sadness and no interest with ADLs [activity of daily living]). This deficient practice had violated Resident 39 ' s rights to be informed and choose the type of care or treatment to be received, make decisions on alternative measures the resident or responsible party preferred, which can negatively affect Resident 39 ' s quality of life. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 39 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of need for resident needs and preferences for 2 out of 22 sampled residents (Resident 22 and 35) by not ensuring the overhead light cord was within resident (22 and 35) ' s reach that prevented resident 22 and 35 from having the ability to turn the light on or off as needed. This deficient practice is not in line with the resident ' s right to have adequate lighting and reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences which limits the resident's ability to see clearly and adjust the lighting to their individual needs. In addition, this deficient practice could also result in accident that results in injury to the residents. Findings: 1. A review of an admission information indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (abnormal irregular heartbeat), rheumatoid arthritis (swelling and stiffness of joints) and Dry eye syndrome (eyes do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate lighting suitable to perform tasks that the resident chooses to perform, or the facility staff must perform to assist one of twenty-two sampled residents (Resident 48). This deficient practice violated the resident ' s right to reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences which was essential to creating and individualized, home- like environment to include adequate and comfortable lighting levels. This deficient practice could also result in resident falls or accidents in the room which could lead to injury. Comfortable light means lighting that minimizes glare and provides maximum resident control, where feasible, over the intensity, location, and direction of lighting to meet their needs or enhance independent functioning. Findings: A review of Resident 48 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of neck, right femur (thigh bone), right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop an individualized resident-centered care plan (a care plan that prioritizes the unique health needs and desired outcomes of the resident) to meet the resident's' needs for two of 2 sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 187). 1. Resident 17 did not have a care plan with a measurable objective to ensure the resident is participating in activities. 2. Resident 187 was unable to attend group activity. The care plan did not indicate the reason the resident was unable to attend activities. The care plan goals indicated Resident 187 will benefit and participate in room/bedside activities: X/week. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to receive the appropriate interventions to achieve the goals to achieve the highest practicable mental and psychosocial (social, cultural, and environmental influences on the mind and behavior) wellbeing and improve in the quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 17 ' s admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to one of three sampled residents (Resident 46) who was dependent with the staff to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) by not maintaining grooming, and good personal hygiene by not shaving her long facial hairs above the lips and under the chin. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 46 ' s self image, physical appearance, dignity, and quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 46s admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), Alzheimer ' s disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually loose the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), and history of pneumonia (swelling of the tissue in one or both lungs, usually caused by a bacterial infection). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient hydration to one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 22) who was not provided and offered water at bedside to maintain and promote proper hydration (process of replacing water loss in the body) and health as indicated in resident ' s care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for dehydration (a harmful reduction in the amount of water in the body) and poor nutritional outcomes. Findings: A review of Resident 22 ' s Face Sheet (Document that gives a patient ' s information such as contact details and brief medical history) indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 3/1/2024, with diagnoses that included proximal atrial Fibrillation (abnormal Heartbeat), Chronic constipation (Not passing stools regularly) rheumatoid arthritis (condition that causes pain and swelling and stiffness in the joints). A review of Resident 22 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – comprehensive assessment and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light (a device that allows residents to signal caregivers when they are in need of help and allows caregivers to communicate with each other at a distance) was accessible while in bed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 39) who was observed with call light stuck between the left side bedrail and the bed, hanging below the bottom of the mattress. Resident 39 stated she needed assistance from the staffs because she was having difficulty putting her sweater and she was feeling cold and unable to reach the call light to call for assistance. This failure had the potential for Resident 39 not to receive assistance timely or not receive assistance with her needs or in an event of an emergency that could result in a decline in performing ADLs (activities of daily living) residents well being. Findings: A review of Resident 39 ' s admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place fall risk identifiers for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to result in repeated falls for Resident 1 who already had a history of multiple falls with injury. Findings During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (excess of fats in the blood), and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat that can lead to blood clots in the heart). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Fall Risk Assessment, dated 12/28/2022, indicated a Fall Risk Score of 16 that means Resident 1 was assessed as high risk for falls. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach, as indicated in the care plan for fall and dementia, and in accordance with the facility's policy for falls and call lights for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1 ' s quality of life and quality of care for not being able to call for assistance if needed. Resident 1 had diagnoses that include dementia and anxiety disorder. Resident 1 was a fall risk and had a fall incident on 10/24/23. Resident 1 had been diagnosed with osteoporosis ( decrease in bone strength that can increase the risk of fractures) and had an injury of unknown origin on 11/06/23 Left Hip Fracture (Break). Resident 1 was readmitted [DATE] status post-surgery from the left hip fracture and requires maximum assist with activity of daily living (ADL). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents, who were at risk for falls and history of multiple falls, had assigned direct care staff that were made aware of revisions to the resident ' s fall care plan by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 ' s fall care plan initiated on 9/20/23 and revised on 10/21/23 was implemented to include staff visual monitoring every hour for fall precaution. 2. Include Resident 1 on the list of residents for CNA3 to monitor. 3. Orient CNA3 on Resident 1 ' s history of falls and fall interventions to be implemented. 4. Ensure CNA3 would monitor Resident 1 as part of general fall prevention and not only when out of bed and in the Activity Room. As a result, Resident 1 had a fall on 10/13/23 which resulted to an acute appearing left femoral periprosthetic fracture (a broken bone that happens around or very close to the implants [metal and plastic] of a hip replacement) and another fall, on 10/20/23 (within 7 days) which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact) on 9/22/2023 around 2 PM when Resident 1 exposed his penis (the male genital organ) and grabbed Resident 2 ' s breast while in the facility ' s Activity Room as observed by Resident 3. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 2 experiencing sexual abuse and unwanted nonconsensual sexual contact from Resident 1. Resident 2, who has a diagnosis of Alzheimer ' s (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) with dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) did not exhibit a change in behavior due to the sexual abuse but had a potential to suffer a negative psychosocial outcome such as anger, fear, anxiety, or loss of self-esteem using the reasonable person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse from another resident to the State Agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]) and other officials immediately, but not later than two hours, in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure on Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy and Procedure, for one of three sampled residents (Residents 3). Resident 3 and Family Member (FM 1) reported to facility staff (Receptionist [RCP]) that Resident 1 was observed exposing his penis (the male genital organ) and grabbing Resident 2 ' s breast while in the facility ' s Activity Room on 9/23/2023. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to under report allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment which could lead to failure to investigate all types of abuse in a timely manner and protect residents from abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-08 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing information of actual hours worked by Registered Nurses (RN), License Vocational Nurse (LVN) and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) per shift on 5/7/26 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Posting Direct Care Staffing Numbers. This deficient practice of posting inaccurate nurse staffing information failed to ensure that residents, their representatives, visitors, and regulatory personnel had access to correct and reliable staffing data. This had the potential to misrepresent the actual number of nursing staff available to provide resident care and could negatively affect transparency and the facility's compliance with required posting regulations. Findings: During a review of the facility's document titled Nursing Staffing Daily Posting (posting of staffing information), dated 5/7/2026, the document did not indicate the number of actual time worked per shift for each nursing category (licensed or non-licensed); instead, the document contained a combined total of projected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,122 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,122 — penalty dated 2025-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GC OPERATING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 12/06/2011
GRANCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MHC HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
GRUNSTEIN, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/06/2019
CAPITAL FUNDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 06/01/2015
DELA CUADRA, ALEXIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2024
RIMANDO, JENNYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2020
SARCAUGA, DENNISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
AVAKIAN, SAROIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2017
VERDUGO VISTA OPERATING COMPANY GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/27/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.8M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 27%Other / private 9%

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$436per resident / day
operating cost
$13,263per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$441per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055960. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next