No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vale Healthcare Center

13484 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo, CA 94806 · For profit - Corporation · 202 certified beds · (510) 232-5945 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (510) 232-5945 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2023 Vale Rd · (510) 215-9092 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2089 Vale Rd Ste 31 · (510) 235-4443 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13901 San Pablo Ave · (510) 965-1507 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5 Church Ln · (510) 215-3092 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.9%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.762.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.8%CMS range 36.4–61.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.4–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified2.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.9–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
33.9%
Total nursing turnover
26.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 187.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents in the facility from potential physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) was accused of deliberately slapping one resident (Resident 1) on the left arm and the facility failed to maintain documentation of a thorough abuse investigation and failed to notify the responsible party (RP) for Resident 1 of the allegation as required by facility policy.This failure resulted in placing all residents in the facility at risk of physical abuse and resulted in the RP for Resident 1 feeling alarmed.During a record review of facility's document titled, Resident Face Sheet, dated 4/7/26, for Resident 1, the document indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in April 2023 with multiple diagnoses including nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding within the skull) and chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (the final stage of long-term kidney disease when the kidneys are no longer sufficiently able to remove waste products and excess water to support the body's needs), dependence on renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate supervision and interventions to prevent a resident-to-resident physical altercation for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when Resident 2 entered Resident 1's room and punched Resident 1 in the face.This failure resulted in redness to Resident 1's face and caused feeling upset, and had the potential to result in serious physical injury and psychosocial harm including fear and emotional distress.During a record review of Resident 1's Face Sheet dated on 3/17/26, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of rectum and depression (serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest).During a record review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), to identify risk and develop a plan to help prevent Resident 1 from leaving the facility without authorization and unannounced. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility.Findings:A review of the facility's Resident Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cellulitis of left lower limb, unspecified behavioral and emotional disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, Schizophrenia, and alcohol dependence. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 01/25/2026, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information) score of 08, (BIMS score of 00 - 07: severe impairment; 08 - 12: moderately impaired; and 13 - 15: cognitively intact).During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to report Resident 2's verbal abuse and threat of harm against Resident 1 (one of three sampled residents) to the State Agency, local law enforcement, and/or the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (Resident advocate for rights and care in long-term facilities). This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for further abuse and psychosocial harm.During a record review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (resident demographic and clinical summary), Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 11/17/25, MDS indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information). This score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, Facility 2 failed to document Resident 1's needs that could not be met by Facility 2 and the reasons why Resident 1's transfer or discharge was necessary. Facility 2 failed to appropriately communicate information concerning Resident 1's condition to Facility 1 prior to sending Resident 1 back to Facility 1. Facility 2 staff failed to properly admit Resident 1 to Facility 2 and then had Resident 1 transported back to Facility 1 from Facility 2, without properly discharging Resident 1 (from Facility 2) or having his medical needs assessed. This failure had the potential to result in a lapse in care when Resident 1 was sent back to Facility 1 from Facility 2 within a seven hour period on the same day.During a record review of Facility 1's document titled, Inpatient Medicine Discharge Summary, dated 7/11/25, the Inpatient Medicine Discharge Summary indicated Resident 1 had been admitted at Facility 1 from 6/12/2024 to 7/11/2025 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to repair a moderate dent in the wall in Resident 107's room.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident not feeling or having a safe and/or homelike environment.Findings: During a review of Resident 107's Face Sheet, dated 7/24/25, the Resident Face Sheet indicated, Resident 107 was admitted to facility 4/9/24. During an observation on 7/24/25 at 12:32 p.m. in Resident 107 room, there was a large dented and exposed wall area behind the head of Resident 107's bed. During an interview on 7/24/25 at 12:36 p.m. with Resident 107, Resident 107 stated that the dented and exposed wall looks awful and that they would not have their home look like this. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/24/25 at 5:07 p.m. with Environmental Director (ED) in Resident 107 room, ED stated that the indented and exposed wall should not be there and will take care of it. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights, [undated], the P&P indicated, .The resident has a right to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, for two sampled residents (Resident 15 and 184), the facility failed to provide podiatry referrals to treat their long toe nails. This failure did not provide necessary services for treatment and foot care to these residents. During a review of Resident 15's Face Sheet dated 7/24/25, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in November 2023.During a review of the Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 4/25/25, it indicated Section B indicated Resident 15 had clear speech, able to express ideas and wants, and has the ability to understand others. Section C indicated Resident 15's a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-a standardized cognitive assessment tool) score: 14, intact cognition.During a review of the nursing Progress Note, dated 3/21/25, for Resident 15, the nursing note indicated resident wants to see the podiatrist, referral given to social service office. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling when: 1.One Breyna or Budesonide-Formoterol-Fumarate inhaler labeled only with a room number was found in medication cart 2 (an inhaler is a device used for delivering medicines into the lungs through breathing; Breyna is the brand name of Budesonide-Formoterol-Fumarate inhaler, and is a medication indicated for the treatment of breathing difficulties). 2. Two opened bottles of Refresh eyedrops (lubricating eye drops designed to soothe and relieve dry, irritated eyes) were found in medication cart 4. 3. Resident 11's one opened Incruse Ellipta inhaler was found with no open date label in medication cart 1 (Incruse Ellipta is an inhaler used to prevent and control symptoms associated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or COPD, a long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe). 4. One opened unlabeled Nystatin powder and one unlabeled open tube of TheraHoney gel were found at Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 53 was provided with up-to-date annual dental services.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident experiencing pain, infection or difficulty eating which could lead to potentially decreased nutritional intake and weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 53's Face sheet, dated 7/24/25, the Face sheet indicated, resident 53 was admitted to the facility 1/11/18. During a review of Resident 53's Face sheet, dated 7/24/25, the Face sheet indicated, Resident 53 had medical diagnoses to include altered mental status (change in a person's level of consciousness, alertness, and cognitive function), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and visual impairment.During a review of Resident 53's Minimum Data Set (MDS-standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health and functional status of residents), dated 7/16/25, The MDS indicated, the following: Section C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, sanitary storage of food when:Multiple opened food items stored in the dry storage and refrigerators did not have open dates and use-by dates.Paper bag with food labeled 7/14 stored in the refrigerator had directions give to resident next day This failure had the potential to place all residents getting meals from the kitchen to be at risk for foodborne illness potentially leading to hospitalization or death. 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/21/25 at 8:50 a.m., in the kitchen, refrigerator #2 had an opened box of cheesecake, with no open date and no used-by-date. The Registered Dietician (RD)stated he does not know when it was opened. RD stated opened refrigerated cheesecake was good for five days. In the dry storage room, five prepared bowls of dry cereal did not have open date and no use-by-date. RD stated the bowls of cereal should indicate when it was prepared and have a use-by-date. In a storage container of aluminum sealed items, were two eaten banana peels and a soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when:1.The specimen refrigerator (a specimen refrigerator is a specialized cooling unit used to store various biological samples collected from patients, such as urine, stool, blood, or tissue) was observed to be stored in the same room with the ice container for residents' consumption. 2. Station 2 medication storage room drawer was found to be disorganized and contained medications mixed with specimen sample containers, central line dressing kit, needles and socks stored together. (a specimen container is used to store various biological samples collected from patients, such as urine, stool, blood, or tissue; Central Line Dressing kits are used for very clean resident dressing changes). These failures placed the facility residents at increased risk of healthcare associated infections. Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/22/25, at 4:19 p.m., with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 3, in the Station 1 utility room, the specimen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility had three Resident rooms (Rooms 35, 41 and 43) with multiple beds that provided less that 80 square feet (sq. ft) per Resident who occupied these roomsThis deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each Resident in each of these rooms and/or for storage of the Resident's belongings.Findings: During an observation 7/24/25 at 3:15 p.m., following rooms and corresponding sq. ft per bed were identified: room [ROOM NUMBER] had three beds, total sq. ft. is 231.6 and 77.2 sq. ft. per bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three beds, total sq. ft. is 231.6 and 77.2 sq. ft. per bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three beds, total sq. ft. is 231.6 and 77.2 sq. ft. per bed.During an interview on 7/24/25 at 12:32 p.m. with Resident 107, Resident 107 stated regarding the room size that it feels at little like a cubicle but making do and not to bothersome.During an interview on 7/24/25 at 12:43 p.m. with Resident 44, Resident 44 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the code status (a medical term that indicates a patient's wishes regarding resuscitation and life-saving measures in the event of a medical emergency) for Resident 193.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident receiving treatments they may not want which could prolong their suffering or interventions inconsistent with their values and/or preferences.Findings: During a review of Resident 193's Face sheet, [undated], the Face sheet, indicated, that Resident 193 was admitted to the facility 7/9/25 and there was no Advance Directives (AD-a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) or code status noted for this Resident. During a review of Resident 193's Progress Notes, dated 7/18/25, the Progress Notes, indicated, that at 8:50 p.m. Resident 193 was found unresponsive, no pulse, no respiration.Registered Nurse (RN) declare the time of death at 8:50 p.m. During a review of Resident 193's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- document to ensure that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a grievance for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 38).This resulted in Resident 38's grievance to go unresolved. During a review of Resident 38's Facesheet (information containing contact details, brief medical history at a glance), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) dated 5/1/25, indicated Resident 38 had a brief interview for mental status or BIMS score of 15 (BIMS score of 13-15 indicates intact cognition).During an interview with Resident 38 on 7/21/25 at 12:03. p.m., Resident 38 stated my 500 dollars was stolen a few months ago and nothing has been done about it. Resident 38 also stated he had reported the missing money to the Director of Nursing (DON) and had not heard anything back.During a concurrent interview and record review, on 7/23/25, at 3:25 p.m., with DON, DON stated Resident 38 informed her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 200) who smoked, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed to address Resident 200's smoking.This failure had the potential to result in the lack of interventions to promote safe smoking.During a review of Resident 200's RFS, the RFS indicated Resident 200 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (infection in the bone), severe sepsis (serious condition resulting from the body's response to infection, can lead to tissue damage and death if not treated promptly), and generalized anxiety disorder (mental health condition, persistent and excessive worry about various aspects of life). During an observation and interview on 7/22/25 at 4:42 p.m. with Resident 200, there was an open pack of cigarettes on the overbed table. Resident 200 stated going out to smoke four times a day and that the facility staff had allowed cigarettes to be kept at the bedside. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for two sampled residents (Resident 199 and 200), the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards and failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision when:1. Resident 199 left the facility unsupervised. This failure had the potential to result in significant risks to resident's safety.2. Resident 200 had cigarettes at the bedside. This failure had the potential to result in fire hazards. 1.During a review of Resident 199's Resident Face Sheet (RFS), the RFS indicated Resident 119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), other non-toxic encephalopathy (brain disease), congestive heart failure and pleural effusion (fluid buildup around the lungs).During an interview on 7/21/25 at 10 a.m. with Resident 199, Resident 199 stated there was no reason to stay in the facility, and that staying longer would make Resident 199 lose the apartment. Resident 199 had expressed wanting to go…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of three (Resident 112) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health services, the facility failed to follow the psychiatrist's recommendation when Complete Blood Count (CBC, a common blood test that measures various components of your blood that included red blood cells, white blood cells, hemoglobin, etc. ), Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP, blood test that measures glucose, calcium, electrolytes, etc. to detect conditions such as liver and kidney disease and diabetes) and Urinalysis (UA, used to detect and manage disorders such as urinary tract infection, kidney disease and diabetes) and Culture and Sensitivity (C&S, used to diagnose urinary tract infection and guide antibiotic therapy) were not conducted.This failure had the potential to result in undetected abnormal blood levels due to current treatment. During a review of Resident 112's Resident Face Sheet (RFS), the RFS indicated Resident 112 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the left lower limb, acute kidney failure, sepsis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Resident 91 was updated regarding the status of her power wheelchairThis deficient practice had the potential to result in a significant impact on the resident's independence, quality of life, physical and mental health. During a review of Resident 91's Face sheet, dated 7/24/25, the Face sheet indicated, an initial admission date of 11/3/2018 and latest return date of 7/20/25. During a review of Resident 91's Face sheet, dated 7/24/25, the Face sheet indicated, Resident 91 had diagnoses to include: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), diabetes mellitus type 2 (body either doesn't produce enough insulin or can't properly use the insulin it produces, leading to high blood sugar levels), chronic pain, anxiety disorder (excessive, persistent, and unreasonable fear and worry, often interfering with daily life), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD,persistent sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that significantly impair daily life),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide call system (allows patients to request assistance from healthcare staff, typically nurses, by activating a call button or other alerting device. These systems are crucial for patient safety and efficient care delivery, enabling patients to quickly summon help when needed) to Resident 107.This deficient practice had the potential to result in resident having trouble accessing help for medication needs basic comfort or hygiene needs to prevent falls.Findings:During a review of Resident 107's Face sheet, [undated], the Face sheet indicated, Resident 107 was admitted to the facility 4/9/24 and has diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung), Fracture of Left and Right Humerus (break in the upper arm bones), Vertigo (sensation that you or your surroundings are spinning or moving) Anxiety (feelings of worry, nervousness, or unease) and Depression (mood disorder that can affect how you think, feel, and handle daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to track, find, replace, and follow up with two of two Residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) whose dentures were lost at the facility. This failure resulted in two Residents not having their teeth to eat and talk which impacted their dignity and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission record titled Face Sheet, undated, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for Heart Failure (A chronic condition where the heart doesn ' t pump blood as well as it should.). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool to guide care), the MDS assessment indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a mental status exam) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment also indicated Resident 2 required set up and assistance with oral hygiene, to include managing, denture soaking, and rinsing with use of equipment. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. For one of four sampled residents (Resident 3), the Interdisciplinary Team ' s (IDT, a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their residents) recommendation for Psychology (Psych) Consult related to an abuse allegation was not referred by Social Services (SS) Department. This failure had the potential to put Resident 3 ' s safety at risk and could lead to abuse re-occurrence and resident feeling depressed, angry, and vulnerable. 2. For one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), an appropriate physical abuse care plan (CP, a document that outlines the resident ' s assessment health and social care needs and how it will be supported) was not created. This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 ' s safety at risk and for resident to not receive the care that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications timely for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when multiple medications for Resident 1 were administered after the ordered administration time. This failure had the potential for exacerbating Resident 1's health condition and compromising their overall health and well-being. Findings: A record review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, (undated), indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses including Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV, a virus that attacks cells that help the body fight infection, making a person more vulnerable to other infections and diseases), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems. It includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis), End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, the final stage of long-term kidney disease when the kidneys are no longer sufficiently able to remove waste…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and COVID (a virus like the cold or flu) test kits were discarded when they were kept with ready to use medications in medication storage areas. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving abnormal COVID test results, less potent or less effective doses of the medication which can lead to new health problems or adverse reactions. Findings: During an observation and interview on 05/21/24 at 2:18 p.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor, in Nursing Station One refrigerator, an Emergency kit (E-kit- a small quantity of medications that can be used when pharmacy services are not available) was observed with two red tag clips. Expiration (EXP) date on this E-kit was observed to be 04/24. Opened this, E-kit had and it was observed to have the following expired meds in it: -Levemir 100 unit (u)/milliliter (ml) (medication used for high blood sugar) (EXP: 06/23) -Novolog 100 u/ml (medication used for high blood sugar) (EXP:02/23) -Novolin R 100 u/ml (fast acting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record and document review, the facility failed to provide services for activities of daily living for 2 (Resident 36 and 73) of 35 sampled residents when: 1. For Resident 73, fingernails were long and had black debris under the fingernails. 2. For Resident 36, feet were dry and toenails long. 3. For Resident 36, nursing staff did not get resident up in his wheelchair for a substantial period of time. These failures resulted in basic needs necessary for a quality of life not being met. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/20/24, at 9:42 a.m., Resident 73 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 73 had black debris under his fingernails to both hands. Resident was not interviewable. During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/21/24, at 9:50 a.m., Resident 73 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 73 had black debris under his fingernails of both hands. The licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) stated his fingernails were dirty. LVN 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 178), the facility failed to respond to a pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident) recommendations when facility did not act upon pharmacy recommendations for Resident 178's psychoactive medications behavior and side effects monitoring and Lisinopril pulse monitoring. These failures had the potential for missed opportunities to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, and/or other irregularities for Residents 178. Findings: A review of Resident 178's Resident Face Sheet indicated Resident 178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that affects memory, thinking, and behavior) and dementia (memory loss). A review of Resident 178's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to provide care), dated 2/24/24, indicated resident was usually able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent (5%). During the medication pass on 05/21/24, three medication errors were observed out of thirty-five opportunities for two out of three residents, resulting in an error rate of 8.57%. This failure had the potential to result in more than minimal changes in the health and safety of Residents 78 and 155's conditions. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Medication Pass Guidelines [undated], it was indicated that Physician's Orders - Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Nursing Care Center Pharmacy Policy & Procedure Manual-Medication Administration, dated 2007, it was indicated Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) .Medications are administered in accordance with the written orders of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, sanitary storage of food when: 1. A thawed pork loin tied closed with a disposable glove was found on a dirty plastic platform and was not labeled with a thaw or use by date, 2. The same thawed pork loin was later found in the freezer and red liquid was leaking from the package. This failure had the potential to place all residents getting meals from the kitchen to be at risk for foodborne illness potentially leading to hospitalization or death. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/20/24, at 9:30 a.m., the kitchen walk-in refrigerator was inspected. A pork loin was resting on a plastic platform. The pork loin had a disposable glove tied to one end of the package to close the package. The plastic platform had accumulated debris on the surfaces which the pork loin was resting. The pork loin did not have a label indicating the thaw or use by date. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/24, at 9:40 a.m., with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), in the walk-in refrigerator the CDM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate pain assessment and pain management for one of 60 sampled residents (Resident 18) when Resident 18's left foot pain was not accurately and regularly assessed using an appropriate pain scale (numerical expression of pain severity out of ten, 0, no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-7 moderate pain and 8-10 severe pain) and pain medications were not provided in a timely manner. This failure resulted in Resident 18 having 9/10 to 10/10 left foot pain which was not relieved for over one hour and was not accurately assessed during administration of pain medications delaying additional pain interventions. Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission record indicated an admission date of 4/2024 for a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (disease affecting the digestive tract), peripheral vascular disease (disorder of the blood vessels causing reduced blood flow) and unspecified atrial fibrillation (a disease of the electrical conduction of the heart). A record review of Resident 18's minimum data set (MDS, a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) from physical abuse when Resident 2 attempted to hit Resident 3 with Resident 2 ' s walker. The failure to protect Resident 3, a wheelchair dependent resident, from Resident 2, a resident with known aggressive behaviors, caused Resident 3 to slide off her wheelchair to the floor and had the potential to cause Resident 3 emotional and/or psychological distress. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s Face Sheet, dated 12/7/23, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss) and Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool to guide care), dated 10/18/23, indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool to identify resident's cognitive status) score of 8, which showed Resident 2 had mildly impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2), the facility failed to evaluate the effectiveness of the care plan and update as needed to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet Resident 2 ' s immediate care and psychosocial needs. This deficient practice resulted in a care plan that did not accurately reflect specific medical interventions necessary to meet the resident ' s current nursing care needs. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s Face Sheet, dated 12/7/23, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (also known as stroke, refers to damaged tissues of the brain) and depression. A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool to guide care), dated 9/7/23, indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool to identify resident's cognitive status) score of 12, which showed Resident 2 had intact cognitive function. The MDS indicated Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was referred to and provided Podiatry Services. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 having pain and at risk of injury because of his thick, long toenails to left foot. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, undated, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus (increased blood sugar level) and venous insufficiency (a condition when the heart cannot pump blood from the leg veins back to the heart). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool to guide care), dated 11/21/23, indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool to identify resident's cognitive status) score of 15, which showed Resident 1 had intact cognitive function. A review of Resident 1 ' s Physician Order Report, dated 11/7/23-12/7/23, indicated, Start Date 11/19/22 – Refer to Podiatry Services for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to appropriate authorities within the required regulatory timeframe for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: Resident 1 had a verbal altercation with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) on 5/22/23, at 11 a.m., but was not reported by either CNA 1 or the witness staff CNA 2 until Resident 1 herself reported the incident to administration on 5/22/23, at 5:30 p.m. This failure resulted in the potential to negatively impact the protection of Resident 1 and the other residents in the facility from abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, undated, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2018, with diagnoses of morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 4/26/23, indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. (BIMS is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), from abuse when: Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) had a verbal altercation with Resident 1, called the resident inappropriate names, and threatened to run over resident with CNA 1's car when resident goes out to the store. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling upset, intimidated, and scared creating emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, undated, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2018, with diagnoses of morbid obesity, depression, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 4/26/23, indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. (BIMS is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. The scale is from zero to 15, with a score of 15 as intact cognition). The MDS indicated Resident 1 was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident 17, Resident 133) with a gastrostomy feeding tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) received adequate nutrition and fluids when: 1.Resident 17's tube feeding was not administered according to physician order, the dietician recommendations were not communicated to the physician, and his weights were not monitored in three of the preceding six months. 2. Resident 133's tube feeding was not administered according to physician order, and the dietician recommendations were not communicated to the physician. These failures had the potential to result in undesirable weight loss or weight gain, dehydration, and malnutrition. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, undated, the record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2021. The admission Record indicated Resident 17 had difficulty swallowing, was on a tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain staff competency records for four of four sampled licensed staff: Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4), Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), and Registered Nurse (RN 2). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate and/or inappropriate nursing care for any of the 176 residents. Findings: During an interview with Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 7/28/22, at 10:01 a.m., in Sunshine Dining room, DSD stated she was responsible for maintaining documentation and records of staff training and staff probationary and annual evaluations. DSD stated the nursing staff probationary period was ninety days from date of hire. A review of the facility Employee Performance Appraisal form dated May 2021, indicated the purpose of the form was to, reflect the overall performance of the employee considering each factor as knowledge, skills, and abilities, but primarily on whether the employee 's performance produced the desired results. The form had seven sections titled: Job…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. During a review of Resident 18's Physician's orders dated [DATE], the order indicated resident was on a prescription mouthwash, Peridex, two times a day. During a concurrent observation and record review on [DATE] at 10:20 a.m., a bottle of Peridex prescription mouthwash was on Resident 18's bedside table. The label indicated the name of a resident, not Resident 18's name, at the top of the label, with black lines across the resident name. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:20 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 7 (CNA 7), CNA 7 stated she had used the prescription mouthwash with the scratched label to clean Resident 18's mouth that morning. During an interview with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) on [DATE] at 10:13 a.m., stated medication belonging to another resident should not be left at Resident 18's bedside, or used for Resident 18. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 1/21 indicated Medications supplied for one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate did not exceed five percent. There were eight medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error that totaled 32 percent (%) error rate when: 1. Resident 35 received four medications more than one hour after the scheduled administration time: metoprolol (used to lower blood pressure and treat heart failure), Xarelto (a blood thinner used to prevent clot formation which can cause heart attacks and strokes), hydrochlorothiazide (used to increase urination), hydrocodone (used for pain control). 2. Resident 170 received four medications more than one hour after the scheduled administrations time: furosemide (to reduce fluid retention), methadone (for pain control), spironolactone (used to increase urination), intravenous vancomycin (an antibiotic given directly into the bloodstream through a tube inserted into a vein). The failure to ensure nurses administered medications within one hour of the scheduled administration time had the potential to result in medications being less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. A review of Resident 97's face sheet, undated, indicated Resident 97 was admitted in 2019, with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus (the body's inadequate production of the hormone insulin results in high blood sugar levels causing excessive urination and damage to body organs), and dementia (a chronic progressive disease marked by memory loss, personality changes and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 97's Prescription Order, dated [DATE], indicated three units of Novolog U-100 Insulin, (an insulin preparation with a concentration of 100 Units per milliliter) was to be injected before meals, three times a day at 6:45 a.m., 11:45 a.m., and 4:45 p.m. The Order indicted the medication was needed for treatment of Resident 97's diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident 97's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 97 had an active diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and had received daily injections of insulin in the seven-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use proper food handling techniques when in the kitchen during tray line, the hair for two dietary staff was not completely restrained with a hairnet. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness. Findings: During an observation on 7/27/22, at 12:08 p.m., in the kitchen, Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was in the tray line, plating food for lunch, with a hairnet only covering the back portion of her hair, leaving the top and front portion of her hair uncovered. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/27/22, at 12:10 p.m., with Dietary Aide 2 (DA 2), in the kitchen, DA 2 was plating food with a hairnet covering only the crown of her head. DA 2 stated it was important to have a hairnet covering the entire head of hair so that no hair could drop into the food, which would be unsanitary. During an interview on 7/27/22, at 12:13 p.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM), in the kitchen, the DM stated dietary staff must wear hairnets to cover the entire head of hair, so that hair did not fall into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control policies and procedures were followed when: 1. One employee did not perform hand hygiene per protocol when doffing and donning gloves when providing direct care for one (Resident 56) of 35 sampled residents. 2. One employee did not wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, protective items or garments worn to protect the body or clothing from hazards that can cause injury) as required in the area for persons under investigation for infection with COVID (yellow zone) when caring for one (Resident 92) of 35 sampled residents. 3. Facility nurses did not date and initial the newly changed dressing of Resident 157's percutaneous line (a needle is inserted into a vein and a tube threaded through the needle and into the vein until reaching a high blood flow area in the trunk of the body). 4. Three medication carts had white particulates on top of the carts. 5. Nursing staff had not disinfected or cleaned a medication tray used to distribute medications between two residents. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist one (Resident 38) of 35 sampled residents with bathing according to her preferences. This failure had the potential to result in emotional distress and decreased self-esteem from not receiving showers for two years. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, undated, the admission Record indicated that Resident 38 was re-admitted to the facility in November 2020 with a diagnosis of morbid obesity. During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 4/27/2022, section G indicated Resident 21 needed limited assistance from one person for transfer between surfaces and bathing and was independent in locomotion with use of either a wheelchair or walker. The MDS indicated Resident 38 had unimpaired thinking and remembering skills. The MDS Annual assessment dated [DATE], indicated it was very important to Resident 38 to choose whether to have a tub bath, shower, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for two weeks when one (Resident 13) of 35 sampled residents developed a wound on the buttock. The failure to notify the physician resulted in delay of treatment and had the potential to result in delayed healing and exacerbation of the wound. Findings: During a record review of Resident 13's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2017. A review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 7/18/22, indicated he had a diagnosis of dementia (a chronic progressive disease marked by memory loss, personality changes and impaired reasoning). The MDS indicated Resident 13 had highly impaired vision, moderate difficulty hearing, unclear speech, was sometimes able to understand others, and was usually able to make himself understood. The MDS indicated Resident 13 required extensive physical assistance from one person for bed mobility and locomotion, and total assistance from one person for personal hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a comprehensive nutrition care plan that described services to be furnished for one (Resident 17) of 35 sampled residents. The failure to have a care plan which described Resident 17's current services and interventions for the nutritional needs associated with use of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) had the potential to result in weight loss, malnutrition, and complications such as pneumonia. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's undated admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2021. The admission Record indicated Resident 17 had difficulty swallowing, was on a tube feeding via gastrostomy tube, was unable to speak, and was unable to move himself in bed due to contractures (arm and leg are tight and prevent stretching of the limbs) from a cerebral infarction (damage to the brain, from interruption of the blood supply). During a review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 21) of 35 residents received grooming assistance. This failure resulted in Resident 21 feeling uncomfortable due to long fingernails with black material under the nail tips and had the potential to result in scratches and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in January 2022. During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 4/21/2022, the MDS indicated Resident 21 had a diagnosis of dementia (a brain disorder that affects the ability to remember, think clearly, communicate, and perform daily activities), but was able to understand others and be understood. The MDS indicated Resident 21 needed extensive assistance from one person for personal hygiene and grooming. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/25/22, at 10:40 a.m., Resident 21 had thickened fingernails extending beyond the end of his fingertips with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 173) of 35 residents received toenail care assistance according to the Resident's preferences. This failure had the potential to result in decreased self-esteem, decreased ability to wear shoes comfortably, and be scratched by the long toenails. Findings: During a review of Resident 173's admission Record, undated, the admission Record indicated Resident 173 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with a diagnosis of paraplegia. During a review of Resident 173's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 7/8/2022, the MDS indicated Resident 173 was able to understand and be understood and had unimpaired thinking and remembering skills. The MDS indicated Resident 173 was totally dependent on one person for personal hygiene and grooming. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/25/22, at 11:56 a.m., in Resident 173's room. Resident 173's bare left foot had toenails which extended beyond the ends of the toes by one quarter inch. Resident 173…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to respond to a pharmacist's medication regimen review recommendation for one (Resident 136) of 35 residents for more than 30 days. The failure to respond to the recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of the medication aripiprazole (a psychotropic medication, a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) had the potential to result in adverse side effects from continued use for Resident 136 such as stroke, seizures, and suicide. Findings: During a review of Resident 136's face sheet dated 7/29/2022 the record indicated that Resident 136 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia (a chronic progressive disease marked by memory loss, personality changes and impaired reasoning). During a review of Resident 136's Physician Order Report for 6/29/22 to 7/29/22, the Physician Order Report indicated an order, start date 6/17/2022 for daily administration of 15 milligrams (mg) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document entries for two of two sampled residents (Resident 106 and Resident 128) on the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN). This failure resulted in incomplete and inaccurate records. Findings: During a record review of Resident 106's undated Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility in 2017. During a record review of Resident 106's NOMNC, the NOMNC indicated the last day of Medicare part A coverage was 4/15/22. During a record review of Resident 128's undated Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 128 was admitted to the facility in 2015. During a record review of Resident 128's NOMNC, the NOMNC indicated the last day of Medicare part A coverage was 5/24/22. A review of the SNF ABN form (form CMS-10055, 2018) indicated, Signing below means that you've received and understand this notice During a concurrent interview and record review with the Social Service Coordinator (SSC) 1 on 7/28/22, at 10:06 a.m., the SNF ABN notices for Resident 106 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility had three Resident rooms (Rooms 35, 41 and 43) with multiple beds that provided less that 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each residents in each of these rooms and/or for storage of the resident's belongings. Findings: During an observation 05/22/24 at 3:15 p.m., following rooms and corresponding sq. ft per bed were identified: Room Activity Room Size 35 Resident Room 231.6 sq. ft 41 Resident Room 231.6 sq. ft 43 Resident Room 231.6 sq. ft Room Activity Floor Area 35 Bed A Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 35 Bed B Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 35 Bed C Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 41 Bed A Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 41 Bed B Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 41 Bed C Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 43 Bed A Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 43 Bed B Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft 43 Bed C Resident Room 77.2 sq. ft During an interview on 05/22/24, at 3:18 p.m., with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-08-02 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 106 and Resident 128) after they were discharged from Medicare Part A services and continued to live in the facility. This deficient practice resulted in Residents 106 and 128 and their responsible parties/representatives being uninformed about their potential liability for payment and related standard claim appeal rights. Findings: During a record review of Resident 106's undated Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility in 2017. During a record review of Resident 106's NOMNC, the NOMNC indicated the last day of Medicare part A coverage was 4/15/22. During a record review of Resident 128's undated Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 128 was admitted to the facility in 2015. During a record review of Resident 128's NOMNC, the NOMNC indicated the last day of Medicare part A coverage was 5/24/22. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/28/22, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had three resident rooms (35, 41, and 43) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet per resident who occupied these rooms. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents who occupied each room, or for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Maintenance Director/Coordinator (MDC) on 7/28/2022 at 10:39 a.m., the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft) were identified: room [ROOM NUMBER]: room size 228 sq. ft; floor area 76 sq. ft/bed. room [ROOM NUMBER]: room size 228 sq. ft; floor area 76 sq. ft/bed. room [ROOM NUMBER]: room size 228 sq. ft; floor area 76 sq. ft./bed. During random observations of care and services from 7/25/22 through 7/29/22, there was sufficient space for the provision of care for the residents in all the rooms. There was no heavy equipment kept in the rooms that might interfere…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GC HOLDING COMPANY 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 06/30/2015
GRANCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
MHC HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
GRUNSTEIN, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/06/2019
CHIB, PRARTHANAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2025
SARCAUGA, DENNISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
CARTER, BRAZELLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2011
VALE HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 6%Other / private 6%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,586per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$354per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056389. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next