No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Palm Springs Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

277 S Sunrise Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (760) 327-8541 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 327-8541 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
160 N Luring Dr Ste G · (760) 280-5400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
425 S Sunrise Way · (760) 322-2784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Ralphs0.2 mi
425 S Sunrise Way · (760) 327-4370 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1111 E Tahquitz Canyon Way · (888) 280-6777

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.4%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.3%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.3%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.452.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.051.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 342 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
84.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 84.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 110 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 44.7–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.5%CMS range 10.3–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge84.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge78.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 6.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.13
RN hours/ resident / day
1.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.93
RN hoursweekends
41.2%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.27 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper use of Low Air Low (LAL) Mattresses (A specialized air-filled mattress used to treat and prevent the development of pressure ulcers - skin damage caused by prolonged pressure to one area of the body), when the resident's LAL pump/air pressure was not maintained at the proper setting for four of 6 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4).This failure had the potential to contribute to the development and/or prolonged healing of pressure ulcer's (PUs). Findings: On February 11, 2026, at 1012 a.m., an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, who stated a facility medical intervention to help residents avoid development and assist with healing of PU's includes the use of an LAL mattress. The RN stated the LAL mattress has a pump that fills it with air, which relieves prolonged pressure on the resident's skin. The RN further stated the amount of air/pressure of the LAL mattress is controlled by a dial on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 5), when Resident 5 experienced a fall. This failure resulted in the resident's representative not being aware of the resident's change of condition. Findings: A review of Resident 5's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (stroke causing brain cell damage) following a motor vehicle accident. A review of Resident 5's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-A cognitive assessment) dated January 17, 2025, indicated Resident 5 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 5's Doctor's Orders dated February 5, 2025, indicated Resident 5 did not have the capacity to make his own decisions. On February 5, 2026, at 10:15 am, an interview was conducted with the Administrator who stated Resident 5's representative makes his healthcare decisions due to the resident's severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe environment when: 1. Use of siderails were not implemented in accordance with the siderail evaluation conducted on May 24, 2025, for Resident 2. 2. A physician order was not obtained to implement siderails for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These failures had the potential to result in accidents or injury while in bed for Residents 1 and 2. Findings: On June 17, 2025, at 9:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a quality care issue. 1. On June 17, 2025, at 9:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM), who stated Resident 2 had an unwitnessed fall out of bed. The ADM stated the following: a. The staff heard a Thump from resident's room, and found resident face down on the floor, next to her bed. b.The nursing staff called 911, and resident was sent to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for evaluation. c. The resident had a history of seizures and was supposed to have siderails on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate reconciliation of the controlled medication that had been administered for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). This failure increased the risk for medication error, which could negatively impact the residents' health condition. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fracture (break in the bone) of right humerus (upper arm bone). A review of Resident 2 ' s Physician Order Report, for May 2025, indicated, oxycodone (narcotic medication) - Schedule II tablet; 5 mg (milligram-unit of measurement); amt (amount): 1 tab; oral Special Instructions: Dx (diagnosis) Moderate pain 5-6 (pain level), Severe pain 7-10 (pain level) Every 4 (four) Hours - PRN . Further review of the physician order report indicated the medication was ordered on May 2, 2025. On May 29, 2025, at 10:20 a.m., during an interview, Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control precaution in accordance with the facility policy and procedure, when one of nine residents (Resident 1) was identified positive of carbapenem-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA - a type of bacteria resistant to a powerful class of antibiotics) on March 28, 2025. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the vulnerable residents in the subacute care (a level of care needed by a resident who does not require hospital acute care but who requires more intensive licensed skilled nursing care than is provided to the majority of patients in a skilled nursing facility) unit. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was initially admitted in the facility on September 28, 2024, and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included respiratory failure with tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the windpipe to allow air to fill the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the ventilators (vent -a medical device that helps a patient breathe), for eight of 12 residents, Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, were serviced by the due dates indicated on the label at the back of the vents and according to the manufacturer ' s recommendation. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 ' s increased risk for infection and improper ventilation. Findings: On February 26, 2025, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. On February 26, 2025, at 8:36 a.m., during a concurrent observation of Resident 1 with Respiratory Therapist (RT) 1, Resident 1 was lying in bed with eyes closed, with a tracheostomy tube (trach tube - a tube inserted through a surgically created opening in the neck, directly into the windpipe to help a person breathe when their mouth and nose are obstructed or not working properly) connected to a vent. RT 1 stated Resident 1 ' s vent had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for 12 of 14 residents, Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, infection control practices where in place when multiple respiratory equipment was not changed and dated according to the facility ' s policy and procedure. Findings: On February 26, 2025, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. On February 26, 2025, at 8:36 a.m., during an interview, Respiratory Therapist (RT) 1 stated respiratory equipment was changed routinely and as needed (PRN). RT 1 stated they have a schedule to follow. RT 1 stated ventilator circuits, bacterial viral filters (BVF) are changed monthly and PRN; the heat moisture exchangers (HME – a miniature artificial nose that warms and moisten the air a person breathes through their tracheostomy) are changed every Monday, Wednesday and Friday; the [NAME] suction catheters (a medical device that allows to safely suction (remove mucus) from a patient's airway (like through a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely (within three months) complete the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of nursing home residents) assessment for six of 81 residents still in the facility (Residents 57, 14, 38, 28, 30 and 35). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' quality of care and had the potential for staff to not be aware of the residents' care needs and provide appropriate treatment. Findings: On December 11, 2024, at 10:05 a.m., an interview and concurrent record review was conducted with the MDS nurse. The MDS nurse stated Resident 57's MDS quarterly assessment was over three months old. The MDS quarterly assessment was reviewed for all 81 residents in the facility. Five other residents did not have the MDS quarterly assessment completed within three months from the last assessment on August 4, 2024: Resident 14, Resident 38, Resident 28, Resident 30, and Resident 35. The MDS nurse stated the MDS assessments for Residents 57, 14, 38, 28, 30, and 35 should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) and the appropriate use of pain medications when: 1. The Controlled Drug Records (accountability records, an inventory sheet that keeps records of the usage of controlled medications) for five of six residents reviewed (Residents 7, 53, 54, 68, and 70) did not reconcile with the Medication Administration Records (MAR). This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability and the potential for abuse and diversion of controlled medications; and 2. Nursing staff failed to administer one medication as ordered by the prescriber for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 70). This failure resulted in Resident 70 receiving a dose of pain medication without the appropriate indication. Findings: 1a. Resident 7 had a physician order, dated November 20, 2024, for oxycodone (a controlled medication for pain) 5 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for moderate pain. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1a. One half gallon carton of Mocha Mix in the number two reach-in refrigerator did not have a use-by-date and was readily available for use; 1b. One Ziploc bag containing shredded carrots in the number three reach-in refrigerator did not have a use-by-date; and 2. One four ounce orange sherbet container and black residue were observed on the floor behind the freezer racks of the walk-in freezer. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, and toxins) in vulnerable and medically compromised residents. Findings: 1a. On December 9, 2024, at 9:59 a.m. a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Food Service Assistant (FSA) in front of the number two reach-in refrigerator. One half gallon carton of Mocha Mix was labeled opened on 11-29-24. The Mocha Mix did not have a use-by-date label. The FSA stated the Mocha Mix should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) was identified timely and the trauma informed practices and care plan were implemented for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 70). This failure resulted in Resident 70's verbalization of feeling sad and resulted in his mental and psychosocial needs not being met by the facility. Findings: On December 9, 2024, at 4 p.m., Resident 70 was observed sitting upright in his bed awake, alert, and able to verbalize his needs. Resident 70 verbalized the past history of trauma in his life. He was asking to talk to someone in regards to his feelings and about his PTSD. On December 10, 2024, Resident 70's record was reviewed. Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD- lung disease). The history and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed (Resident 196) was free of unnecessary medications when pain assessments were not documented with the administration of pain medications. This failure had the potential for unnecessary or ineffective pain management for Resident 196. Findings: Resident 196 had a physician order, dated December 6, 2024, for hydrocodone with acetaminophen (Norco, a controlled medication for pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for Moderate pain 4-6 Severe pain 7-10. A review of Resident 196's December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident 196 received a dose of Norco 5-325 mg on the following dates and times: - December 7, 2024, at 10:12 a.m.; - December 8, 2024, at 10:03 p.m.; - December 10, 2024, at 8:54 p.m.; and - December 11, 2024, at 8:27 a.m. The record did not indicate the pain rating scale (pain score, numerical value between zero and 10, where zero means no pain and 10 means severe pain) and pain assessment before or after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment used to protect against infection or illness) when taking care of a resident (Resident 43) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms in nursing homes); 2. The facility failed to place a resident (Resident 50) on EBP who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder); and 3. The facility failed to place a resident (Resident 248) on EBP who had a gastrostomy tube (a feeding tube through the skin and the stomach wall). These failures had the potential to increase the spread of multidrug resistant organisms and infections from staff to residents which could lead to illness or death. Findings: 1. On December 9, 2024, at 11:13 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when the call light button was observed not within reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 not to be able to call staff for assistance which could result in unmet resident's needs. Findings: On September 4, 2024, at 9:45 a.m., during an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 2, the resident's call light button was observed hanging on the wall behind the resident's bed. Resident 2 stated he was not sure where the call light was. On September 4, 2024, at 10:02 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 agreed the resident (Resident 34) was not able to reach the call light, and the call light should be within reach. CNA 1 stated that the call light should not be hanging on the wall behind the bed. CNA 1 further stated Resident 2 can fall or not be able to get assistance and he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was assessed timely following an unwitnessed fall. The facility also failed to provide notification to the physician following an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience a delay in the provision of care and complications such as, pain, bruising, scratches, lacerations (a deep cut or tear in skin), and fractures (a complete or partial break in a bone). Findings: On September 4, 2024, at 8:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a facility reported incident. Resident 1 was unavailable for an interview or observation due to being transferred out of the facility to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on August 18, 2024. A review of Resident 1's facility medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (causes bones to become weak and brittle), cerebral infarction (stroke)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident with an alternative meal, consistent with resident's identified food allergies, for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident 1). This failure could have negatively impacted Resident 1's health by consuming a food item they had an allergy to. Findings: On May 7, 2024, at 7:55 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. On May 7, 2024, at 8:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1, who stated, her food allergies are peanuts and tomatoes. Resident further stated, she requested a tuna sandwich from nursing staff, and nursing staff brought her a tuna sandwich with tomatoes on it. Resident 1 informed nursing staff she was allergic to tomatoes, and she could not eat it. Nursing staff returned resident's sandwich and brought her a new tuna sandwich with no tomatoes on it. A review of Resident 1's face sheet, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document ventilator alarm checks every 4 hours, on the ventilator flow sheets, as specified in the facility ' s policy and procedure, Mechanical Ventilation, for 3 out of 3 residents. This failure could have resulted in facility staff to be unaware of a ventilated resident ' s respiratory decline or faulty ventilator setting. Findings: On [DATE], at 12:00 p.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a Quality-of-Care issue. 1) A review of Resident 1 ' s SBAR (Situation, Backround, Assessment, Recommendations), dated, [DATE], at 11:34, by RN 1, stated, . LN (Licensed Nurse) reported to RN (Registered Nurse) that (Resident 1) is unresponsive. Upon assessment, (Resident 1) was unresponsive, blue color, no pulse. Code blue called and CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation, life saving measures) was initiated and called 911 . Review of Resident1 ' s face sheet, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents were treated with dignity and respect, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 made disrespectful comments and gestures towards Resident 1 and 2. This failure resulted in not ensuring residents' rights to be treated with dignity and respect and could potentially result in negative psychosocial outcomes, such as changes in mood and/or behavior. Findings: 1. On July 20, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., during an interview, Resident 3 stated she heard the conversation between CNA 1 and Resident 1 on July 11, 2023, while CNA 1 was providing care to Resident 1. Resident 3 stated CNA 1 said look at that fat, referring to her roommates body. Resident 3 stated CNA 1's comments made her uncomfortable. On July 20, 2023, at 12:12 p.m., an interview with CNA 2 was conducted. CNA 2 stated Resident 1 told him CNA 1 made her feel uncomfortable, by making statements that she was too fat. Resident 1 said to CNA 2 that CNA 1 made her feel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when: 1. Several food items were stored in the refrigerator past their use-by date and readily available for use; 2. Three cans of Vegalene (brand name for vegetable oil spray) oil spray did not have caps and were not labeled with the use-by date and readily available for use; 3. Several fresh fruit and vegetables were stored in zip lock bags which were not properly labeled and readily available for use; 4. The drain pipe behind the ice machine had thick black residue, and the metal back and side panels of the ice machine were dirty and rusty at the bottom. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 54 out of 82 residents who could consume food. Findings: 1. a. During a concurrent observation of the reach-in refrigerator with Dietary Aide (DA) 1 on June 5, 2023 at 9:45 a.m., one carton of Darigold Fit lactose free, reduced fat,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement infection prevention and control practices for seven of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 16, 30, 37, 48, 57, 66, and 281) when: 1. For Residents 16, 30, 37, 48, 57, and 66, the indwelling Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine held in place by a small balloon) bags were observed on the floor; and 2. For Resident 281 the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not perform hand hygiene before providing treatment. These failures had the potential to expose the identified vulnerable residents to infection and to the development and transmission of communicable diseases. Findings: 1. a. On June 7, 2023, at 11:12 a.m., Resident 16, was observed awake, nonverbal, with a tracheostomy (an incision in the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) tube attached to a ventilator (a machine used to move air in and out of the lung), a gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted into the stomach for the delivery of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' representatives (RR-individual who is responsible or legally responsible to make decisions for the resident who cannot make their own decisions) were provided with written information and offered assistance in formulating an Advance Directive (AD-written instructions on the provision of medical care and treatment in the event the person was not able to make decisions) for three of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 21, 37, and 57). This failure had the potential for Residents 21, 37, and 57, to receive care, treatment, and services not in accordance with the residents' best interest and wishes. Findings: 1. On June 5, 2023, at 10:10 a.m., Resident 21, was observed awake watching television. Resident 21 was able to respond by nodding his head for approval. Resident 21 had a tracheostomy (an incision in the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) tube attached to a ventilator (a machine used to move air in and out of the lungs), a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the needs for four of four residents reviewed. (Residents 34, 59, 63, and 280) when: 1. The facility's policies and procedures were not implemented to accurately account for the doses of controlled substances removed from the medication cart and the doses administered to the residents; 2. One discontinued controlled substance medication was stored in the medication cart along with other active medications; and 3. One medication was administered to the resident from the manufacturer's original bottle that did not have a readable expiration date. These had the potential for drug diversion by staff caring for the residents, and wrong and ineffective medications to be administered to the residents. Findings: 1. On June 6, 2023, at 3:40 p.m., during the medication cart inspection in the Desert Wing Nursing Station with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 , blister cards containing controlled substances (CS's) stored in the cart were audited to determine the accuracy of CS accountability. Two residents CS's that were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one resident reviewed for environment (Resident 4), the bed was in good working condition. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to not be properly positioned in bed aggravating her discomfort, and could lead to accidental falls from slipping. Findings: On June 6, 2023, at 11:01 a.m., Resident 4 was observed awake, lying supine in bed, slightly turned to her left side, with the head of the bed raised at approximately a 45 degree angle. Resident 4 stated her bottom hurt. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed to respond to Resident 4 and attempted to reposition her in bed. CNA 1 attempted to lower the head of the bed, but it would not go down. CNA 1 attempted a few times to adjust the bed but the head of the bed remained in place. CNA 1 stated the bed had not worked since a week ago, had been reported to maintenance to fix, and had been written in the maintenance log at the nurses' station. On June 8, 2023, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of 21 residents (Resident 85) the facility failed to provide assistance to feed resident the breakfast meal in a timely manner. Resident 85 waited approximately one hour to be fed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 85 having feelings of not being cared for with dignity and respect when other residents were eating. Findings: On September 9, 2019, at 08:44 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with the Minimum Data Set (MDS)-Licensed Vocational (LVN). Resident 85's breakfast tray was observed on top of the bedside table. There was no facility staff observed providing feeding assistance to Resident 85. The MDS-LVN stated Resident 85 was not assisted to eat her breakfast meal. The MDS-LVN stated breakfast trays were brought out and served approximately 8 a.m., in Resident 85 hallway. A concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 85. Resident 85 was asked if she was hungry and wanted to eat breakfast, Resident 85 noded her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 9) to ensure the two eyedrop solution bottles were not left on the bedside table. This failure had the potential to unsafe administration of the medication. Findings: On September 8, 2019, at 9:04 a.m., an observation and a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 9 and Registered Nurse (RN) 1. Resident 9 was alert and standing by her bedside. Two eye drop solution bottles labeled as, Brimondine opthalmic 0.2% drops (eye drop medication to treat cataracts), and Dorsolamide ophthalmic drops 2 % (treat glaucoma) were observed on her bedside table. Resident 9 then took the two bottles of eye drop solution bottles and stated, these eyedrop bottles are mine. A concurrent interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 verified Resident 9 had two eyedrop solution bottles at bedside. RN 1 further stated there should be no medications left at the resident's bedside table. On September 9, 2019, Resident 9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed, for one of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 58), to ensure the licensed nurses assessed, monitored, and referred to the physician the multiple bluish and reddish skin discoloration identified on the resident's bilateral arms on September 8, 2019. This failure had the potential for the resident to not be monitored for complications related to the multiple skin discolorations such as bleeding, skin tears, and infection. Findings: On September 8, 2019, at 9:54 a.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 58. Multiple bluish and reddish skin discolorations observed on the resident's bilateral arms. In a concurrent interview, Resident 58 stated she did not remember when she had the skin discolorations on her bilateral forearm. Resident 58 further stated the nurses were aware of it. On September 8, 2019, at 10:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3. LVN 3 stated due to Resident 58 old age in her 90's,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed for one of one resident (Resident 189) reviewed for bowel and bladder (B&B) continence (ability to control movements of bowel and urine), to ensure the resident was monitored and evaluated 72 hours upon admission if the resident was a possible candidate for B&B individualized training or scheduled voiding (toileting schedule in which the nurse bring the resident to the bathroom at a certain time for toileting purpose to help prevent incontinence {inability to control movement of bowel and urine}), and restore the highest B&B functioning level. This failure had the potential for a decline in Resident 189's bowel and bladder function. Findings: On September 8, 2019, at 10:16 a.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 189. Resident 189 was in bed, alert, and conversant. Resident 189 stated she wore diapers (incontinence pads) and she did not use the bathroom for her B&B needs. Resident 189 further stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of five residents, Resident 76, reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to address and clarify the pharmacist's recommendation for the medication Risperidone (a drug used to treat mental, mood disorders). This failure prevented the facility to protect Resident 76 from a potential irregularity in the administration of the drug Risperidone for Resident 76. Findings: On September 11, at 10:10 a.m., Resident 76's record was reviewed. The pharmacist's Monthly Medication Review (MRR) was reviewed with the acting director of nursing (ADON). Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), bipolar (a mental disorder with episodes of mood swings), insomnia (inability to sleep), anxiety (excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) and depression (feelings of sadness and/or a loss of interest in activities). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review for two of seven residents reviewed (Residents 190 and 191) for unnecessary use of medications, the facility failed to ensure: 1.a For Resident 190, an assessment upon admission was conducted to evaluate the need for the continued use of Seroquel (medication used to treat behavioral problem), buspirone (medication used to treat anxiety), and sertraline (medication used to treat depression); and 1b. Resident 190 was monitored for the effectiveness of Seroquel and the adverse side effects of buspirone upon admission; and 2. For Resident 191, an assessment upon admission was conducted to evaluate the need for the continued use of Ativan (medication used to treat anxiety) and escitalopram (medication used to treat depression). These failures had the potential for the residents to use unnecessary medications. Findings: 1a. On September 9, 2019, at 2:59 p.m., Resident 190's record was reviewed with Acting Director of Nursing (ADON). Resident 190 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GC HOLDING COMPANY 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 06/30/2015
GRANCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
MHC HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2015
GRUNSTEIN, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/06/2019
ABUSAMRAH SALAIMEH, ABDALLAHIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
NASSAR, NICOLASIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2021
SOTOLONG, PATRICIAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
POTTROFF, DENNISEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/12/2023
SAWYER, MELLOWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/23/2023
TAETZ, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/30/2015
PALM SPRINGS HOLDING COMPANY GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 23%Other / private 13%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$477per resident / day
operating cost
$14,497per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$479per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056229. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next