Monterey Palms Health Care Center
44610 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (760) 776-7700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 342 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.4%CMS range 56.1–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.7–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 19.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.7%CMS range 6.7–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 92.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident's diet as ordered by the doctor (Dr) and did not include the resident's preferences and dislikes for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the facility providing Resident 1 with a clear liquid diet (all food in liquid form), instead of a regular diet (solid foods) as ordered and did not include the residents' preferred foods. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of liver and colon cancer. Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on May 27, 2026. A review of Resident 1's diet order received on May 21, 2026, untimed, indicated .Regular diet . to be served 3 times per day. A review of Resident 1's Communication Slip (a document the nursing staff use to communicate with the dietary staff), dated May 21, 2026, untimed, by the Registered Nurse (RN) indicated, . No Added Salt; CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrates); Clear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications that met the requirements of the facility's policy and procedures consistent with State and Federal law and manufacturer's specifications by: 1. Not maintaining the temperature of the medication room, specified by the drug manufacturers, at or below 77 F (Fahrenheit, unit of temperature measurement) in one of one medication room inspected;2. Storing residents' prescription medications without a pharmacy label in one of two medication carts inspected;3. Storing and not removing timely an expired, open, multi-dose vial of Humulin R (medication to control high blood sugar) in one of two medication carts inspected; and4. Storing two boxes of one medication requiring refrigeration, at room temperature in the drawer of one of two medication carts inspected. These failures had the potential for residents to receive wrong medications and ineffective medication therapy.1. On [DATE], at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were trained and competent to carry out the functions of the department safely and effectively when1. Diet Aide 1 did not follow standard practice to clean the soil meal cart.2. [NAME] 3 unable performed spoon testing for pureed diet and fork testing for Minced and Moist diet. (Cross reference 805)These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food), choking and/or aspiration and further in a medically compromised 85 out of 85 sample residents who received foods from the kitchen.During a review of FDA (Food & Drug Administration) Food Code, 2022, the FDA Food Code indicated, Failure to maintain clean wash, rinse, and sanitizing solutions adversely affects the warewashing (means the cleaning and SANITIZING of UTENSILS and FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT) operation. Equipment and utensils may not be sanitized, resulting in subsequent contamination of food.On May 11,2025, at 9:59 a.m., a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure1. [NAME] 1 used the right scoop served Minced and Moist meat during lunch on 5/11/2026.2. [NAME] 2 used the right scoop served pureed dessert during lunch on 5/11/2026.3. [NAME] 3 used the right scoop served Beef Stroganoff for Residents on Regular diet, Easy to chew, Soft and Bite Sized, and Minced and moist during lunch on 5/12/2026.4. [NAME] 3 followed recipe preparing pureed cauliflower during lunch on 5/12/2026. Failure to follow recipe resulted in pureed cauliflower unable hold its shape (running) on plate and which compromise swallowing safety and increase the risk of choking and/or aspiration. (Cross reference 805).These failures had the potential to negatively impact on the residents' nutritional status and further compromising residents' medical status.1. On May 11, 2026, at 12:26 p.m., a concurrent observation and the Therapeutic Diet Spreadsheet [the document used to guide dietary staff on food items, portions, and therapeutic diet (is a nutritionally planned diet that is ordered by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food textures was provided when1. Residents on pureed diet received grainy pureed beef, lumpy bread and running pureed cauliflower during lunch on 5/12/2026. (Cross reference 802, and 803)2. Residents on Minced and Moist received wrong texture for beef, noodle and cauliflower during lunch on 5/12/2026.3. Residents on Soft and Bite Sized received wrong texture for noodle during lunch on 5/12/2026.4. Resident 88 and 20 received wrong broccoli texture during lunch on 5/11/2026.5. Resident 20 received wrong dessert texture during lunch on 5/11/2026.These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk of aspiration (when food is breathed into the lungs) and choking.1. On May 12, 2026, at 1:14 p.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and Dietary Supervisor (DS), at Food and Nutrition Service office, a test meal was performed for the pureed diet. The following were the test results of different pureed food items:a) The RD verified the pureed beef was not smooth with grainy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food preference were honored for seven out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 12, 41, 46, 66, 88, 101 and 104) during lunch on 5/11/2026 and 5/12/2026.This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake, further compromising Resident 12, 41, 46, 66, 88, 101 and 104's nutritional and medical status.On May 11, 2026, at 12:13 p.m., a concurrent observation, interview and meal ticket (contains Resident name, room number, physician diet order, Allergies, food like and dislike) review were conducted with Resident 104 and Social Services Assistant (SSA) at dining room. Review Resident 104's meal ticket indicated, Preferences: Ice cream. Observed served food items, there was no ice cream. Resident 104 stated, I want ice cream for my lunch and dinner. SSA confirmed Resident 104 did not receive ice cream with his lunch.On May 11, 2026, at 1:05 p.m., a concurrent observation, interview and meal ticket review were conducted with Resident 46 and Director of Nursing (DON) at dining room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on meal distribution observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered diets were followed when:1. Residents on Renal diet being served high sodium and potassium foods during lunch on 5/11/2026.2. Resident 104 on large portion did not receive large portion during lunch on 5/11/2026 and 5/12/2026.3. Resident 104 on No added salt diet being served with salt package during lunch on 5/12/2026.4. Resident 55 on high calories, high protein and high fiber diet did not receive high calories, high protein and high fiber during lunch on 5/11/2026.These failures had the potential negative impact on the residents' medical and nutrition status and in severe instances may result in hospitalization or death.1. On May 11, 2026, at 12:25 p.m., an observation was conducted at the trayline (the process of plating resident meals according to physician ordered diets). Confirmed with [NAME] (CK) 1, there was only one kind of meat (processed ham) and one kind of starch (mashed potatoes) available at the trayline. CK 1 was observed served processed ham and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietary observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when:1. Ice machine in kitchen found grime buildup on ice maker.2. Dust found on several pieces of equipment and area.3. Grime buildup found on several pieces of equipment.4. [NAME] 1 had exposed facial hair during meal preparation.These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another with harmful effect) and foodborne illnesses (are illnesses that results from ingesting contaminated foods) for 85 out of 85 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen.1. On May 12, 2026, at 11:08 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the RD in the kitchen. Ice machine's ice maker was observed had black/ brown/yellowish grime buildup. The RD stated the ice maker needed to have deep clean. The RD stated inside ice machine should be free of grime buildup. The RD stated germ could grow on the grime buildup and cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely maintenance of equipment when:1. The walk-in freezer was maintained in good working condition with ice condensation buildup.2. Rust found on several shelves in kitchen.3. Two worn out cooking pans with missing nonstick coating found in kitchen.4. Chipped paint found in several pieces of equipment in kitchen.These failures had the potential to cause food borne illnesses and poor quality of food served to a population 85 out of 86 sample residents who received food from the kitchen.1. On May 11, 2026, at 10:10 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD) in the walk-in freezer. Ice condensation was observed on the ceiling, on the black pipe behind ventilator, on storage shelves below ventilator. There was ice buildup observed on top of food boxes stored under the ventilator. The RD stated it was unacceptable to have ice condensation and ice buildup in the walk-in freezer. The RD explained ice buildup on food boxes could affect the quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation in the medical record the resident or the responsible party was fully informed with material information provided by the prescriber to be able to make informed decisions prior to starting a psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 114). This failure had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary medication.On May 12, 2026, the medical record of Resident 114 was reviewed and the following was noted: Resident 114 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder; Resident 114 had a physician order on May 4, 2026, for ramelteon 8 mg by mouth daily 30 minutes prior to bedtime without an indication or diagnosis, which was discontinued on May 7, 2026; Resident 114 had a physician order on May 7, 2026, for ramelteon 8 mg by mouth daily at bedtime for supplement; Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a proper diagnosis and indication associated with the use of one psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 114). This failure had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary medication.On May 12, 2026, the medical record of Resident 114 was reviewed and the following was noted: Resident 114 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder; Resident 114 had a physician order on May 4, 2026, for ramelteon 8 mg by mouth daily 30 minutes prior to bedtime without an indication or diagnosis, which was discontinued on May 7, 2026; Resident 114 had a physician order on May 7, 2026, for ramelteon 8 mg by mouth daily at bedtime for supplement; and The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) in Resident 114's medical record indicated Resident 114 received a dose of ramelteon 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for an injury/wound to prevent decline in skin integrity for a right second toe injury for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 3).This failure resulted in the wound going unmonitored, placing the resident at risk for infection and skin breakdown.Findings:On May 11, 2026, at 11:16 a.m., an observation and a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident was observed resting in bed without socks on. The right second toe was observed with a discolored area below the nailbed with a wound/injury present. The area was open to air, and no wound dressing was visualized. Resident stated his foot hit the door in his room a few days ago, possibly a week ago. Resident stated that the injury occurred during transport to the emergency room (ER) by paramedics. Resident was alert, oriented and able to self-report the incident. Resident denied pain and stated he did not report the injury to nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and treatment for one resident (Resident 85) reviewed for oxygen (O2) use when the nasal cannula (NC - a tube used to deliver oxygen through the nose) was not dated when it was last replaced. This failure had the potential to result in deterioration of the nasal cannula, which would allow infectious organisms to grow, causing an infection. Findings: On May 11, 2026, at 12:05 p.m., Resident 85 was observed in bed, awake and alert. Resident 85 was using an NC for O2. The NC did not have a label to indicate the date when it was last changed. In a concurrent interview, Resident 85 stated she did not know when the NC was last changed. On May 11, 2026, at 12:09 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5. LVN 5 observed the NC for Resident 85 and confirmed the NC did not have a label with the date when it was last changed. LVN 5 stated without a date, there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record and document review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete record of controlled substances (CSs), free of discrepancies when the remaining volume in the one pharmacy-labeled bottle containing hydromorphone (a federally scheduled II CS which has the highest potential for addiction and abuse) 5 mg/5 ml (5 milligram per 5 milliliter, unit of concentration of a liquid) oral solution did match the corresponding CS dispense log. This failure could lead to potential diversion of CS and residents not receiving medications needed for pain relief.On May 13. 2026, at 1:49 p.m., during a controlled substance (CS) audit in E Court Medication Cart 1 with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, the following was noted: There was a pharmacy-dispensed bottle labeled, hydromorphone 5 mg/5 ml solution for Resident 10 with the dispensed date of April 1, 2026;The bottle had approximately 100 ml of the solution;The dispense log for Resident 10's hydromorphone solution indicated 2-ml doses were logged out from April 12, 2026, with the last 2-ml dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 57) was provided with special adaptive equipment as ordered by physician for eating with meals.This failure had the potential to result in a burn accident while Resident 57 drinking hot beverage.On May 11, 2026, at 12:28 p.m., a concurrent observation and meal ticket (contains Resident name, room number, physician diet order, allergies, adaptive equipment, food like and dislike) review were conducted with Resident 57 at Assisted Feeding dining room. Resident 57's meal ticket indicated, 2 Handled cup (sippy cup). Resident 57 was observed being used regular cup serving beverage.On May 12, 2026, at 12:42 p.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 57 at Assisted Feeding dining room. Resident 57 was observed both of her hands were shaking intensely.On May 12, 2026, at 1:01 p.m., a concurrent observation, interview and meal ticket review were conducted with Resident 57 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 at Assisted Feeding dining room. CNA 2 reviewed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when trash were found outside surrounding the dumpsters. And the lids of the dumpsters did not close properly due to overflowing.This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents.On May 11, 2026, at 9:39 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) outside back kitchen at dumpster area. There was three dumpsters, one for recycle and another two for trash. The lids of the two trash dumpsters were unable to fully close due to overflowing with trash. Trash was found on floor surrounding the trash dumpster area. One of the recycled dumpster's lid was widely opened. The DS stated surrounding dumpsters should not have trash and dumpsters' lids should close properly to prevent attract pests.On May 11, 2026, at 9:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD). The RD stated it was infection control, and environment hazard issue with trash surrounding dumpsters and lids of the dumpsters not close…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect when a staff member called the resident a liar after the resident alleged the staff member had purposely hit his elbow away while providing resident care.This failure resulted in Resident 1 becoming upset and angry. Findings:On January 29, 2026, at 4:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1, who stated he could not remember the exact date, but Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was providing perineal (area of skin between the anus and genitals) care for him when he asked CNA 1 if CNA 1 would hand him a wipe. When he (Resident 1) reached for the wipe CNA 1 Hit his elbow out of the way. Resident 1 stated it was more than a push. Resident 1 stated he told CNA 1, You hit my elbow, and CNA 1 responded by yelling You're a liar. Resident stated (CNA 1) Got mad at me, and it was upsetting, it made me mad. Resident 1 stated he was not sure of the exact date but he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of residents when two of four sampled residents' (Resident 3 and Resident 7) medications were not administered in accordance with the physician orders. This failure has the potential to negatively impact the effectiveness of the medication which could lead to worsening of Residents 3 and 7's health condition. Findings: On April 29, 2025, at 1:20 p.m., Resident 3 was interviewed. Resident 3 was alert and oriented. Resident 3 stated he would at times receive his antibiotic late or early. A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bacteremia (bacteria in blood), diabetes (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the physician order dated April 11, 2025, indicated, cefazolin 2 (grams) gm/(milliliter) mL (gm/mL measure of metric) administer intravenous (in the vein) every 8 hours at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained in accordance with the accepted professional standards and practices when three of four sampled residents' (Resident 3, Resident 5, and Resident 6) medication administrations were not accurately documented. This failure increased the risk for medication errors which could negatively impact Residents 3, 5, and 6's health condition. Findings: On April 29, 2025, at 1:20 p.m., Resident 3 was interviewed. Resident 3 was alert and oriented. Resident 3 stated he would at times receive his antibiotic late or early. A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bacteremia (bacteria in blood), diabetes (high blood sugar), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the physician order dated April 11, 2025, indicated, cefazolin 2 (grams) gm/(milliliter) mL (gm/mL measure of metric) administer intravenous (in the vein) every 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietetic service observations, dietary staff interviews and dietary document reviews the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services when: 1. Dietary Aide (DA) 2 did not follow manufacture's guideline time length for testing the Quaternary (Quat) sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces); 2. [NAME] 2 did not follow the proper steps to clean the Prep counter after preparing raw chicken on January 28, 2025, (Cross reference to 812); and 3. [NAME] 1 was unable to demonstrate proper Cooling Food (an essential process used in food production to prevent foodborne illness. Bacteria grow best in food in the temperature range 135°F (°F - a unit of measurement) to 41°F, also referred to as the temperature danger zone. Food must be cooled quickly to minimize bacterial growth. If left out to cool, cooked food can become unsafe to eat in a matter of hours). These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 89 out of 89 sampled residents who received food from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietary observation, dietary staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus, recipes, Cooks spreadsheet were followed and resident nutritional needs were met when: 1. [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2 did not follow the Cooks spreadsheet (the menu document used to guide dietary staff on food items, portions, texture of foods and therapeutic diet) to serve the portion size of pureed food items during the noon meal on 1/27/2025 and 1/28/2025; 2. [NAME] 1 did not follow recipe to make pureed cauliflower during the noon meal on January 27, 2025; 3. [NAME] 2 did not follow recipe to make Buttered corn during the noon meal on January 28, 2025 (Cross reference 804); 4. Dietary Aide 1 did not follow the Cooks spreadsheet served the right dessert for Low fat low cholesterol diet and Cardiac diet during the noon meal on January 28, 2025; and 5. The Dietary Manager served salad dressing without measuring during noon meal on January 27, 2025. These failures had the potential for 89 out of 89 sampled residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen to not meet their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide appetizing and palatable (refers to the taste and/or flavor of the food) food at appropriate temperatures according to residents' preferences, for seven out of 89 sample residents, Residents 23, 43, 47, 82, 84, 96 and 99. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased nutritional intake and had the potential to affect the resident's nutritional status. Findings: (Cross reference 803) On January 27, 2025, at 9:27 a.m., during an interview, Resident 96 stated the food was cold most of the time. On January 27, 2025, at 10:59 a.m., during an interview, Resident 43 stated dinner needs to be warm and served on time. On January 27, 2025, at 10:59 a.m., during an interview, Resident 47 stated they did not like the taste of the food. On January 27, 2025, at 11:27 a.m., during an interview, Resident 82 stated the food was terrible and cold. On January 27, 2025, at 11:56 a.m., during an interview, Resident 84 stated the food was terrible, and eggs were cold. On January 28,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, prepare, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service and safety when: 1. Kitchen equipment was stored wet; 2. Dust was found on several locations in the kitchen; 3. Build-up on kitchen equipment: on storage shelves in walk in freezer, on the blender machine, ice machine and hot waterspout; 4. Two opened tortillas exposed to the air in walk in refrigerator; 5. Ground beef was placed in walk in refrigerator for defrosting without a label; 6. Strainer had brown spots on the sieve (mesh in the strainer frame); 7. Two cracked tiles and one broken tile found in dishwashing area; 8. Four jackets found on the rack in storage area number 2; 9. One cutting board was marred found in kitchen; and 10. Cook 2 did not follow proper steps to clean the prep counter after preparing raw chicken. (Cross reference 802) These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) in a medically vulnerable population of 89 of 89 residents who received food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for a resident with a new diagnosis of pulmonary emboli (a condition in which one or more arteries in the lungs become blocked by a blood clot) and on anticoagulant (medication used to prevent blood clots from forming or growing larger) treatment. This failure had the potential to delay the necessary care and services which could place Resident 24 at risk for another life-threatening blood clot or other complications that could develop related to the treatment with an anticoagulant. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 1:40 p.m., Resident 24 was observed awake, alert, lying on bed. Resident 24 was asked if he was hospitalized recently. Resident 24 could not recall. On January 28, 2025, Resident 24's record was reviewed. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure (a chronic condition in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain cleanliness and proper hygiene of resident's fingernails for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 29). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the physiological and psychological well being of Resident 29. In addition this failure had the potential to result in cross contamination of bacteria underneath the dirty fingernails to Resident 29's food during meals. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 2:30 p.m., an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP - a type of infection control practices that use personal protective equipment to reduce the spread of multidrug resistant organism) sign was observed outside Resident 29's room. Resident 29 was observed asleep. A review of Resident 29's record, on January 28, 2025, indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a latest readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were properly stored when: 1. One of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 47) had a bottle of medication from an outside pharmacy by her bedside, readily available for use; 2. Three expired Daptomycin antibiotic (medications used to treat infections) intravenous piggyback (IVPB - a method of administering IV antibiotics by piggybacking it to a primary IV fluids) were stored in the F Court medication room refrigerator for Resident 68, readily available for use. These failures had the potential for the residents to self-administer a medication without licensed nurse monitoring and to receive expired or ineffective medications. Findings: 1. On January 27, 2025, at 11:25 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 47. Resident 47 was observed in her wheelchair by the bedside. Resident 47 was alert, oriented with some confusion noted. An orange medication bottle from (name of outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preference was honored for one of three sampled residents (Resident 50), when a turkey sandwich was on Resident 50's lunch plate and the meal ticket (lists resident's current diet, likes and dislikes for the current day and mealtime) indicated she disliked turkey and liked cottage cheese. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake, and could lead to unplanned weight loss, further compromising Resident 50's nutritional and medical status. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 1:16 p.m., during a concurrent observation, interview and review of meal ticket was conducted with Resident 50 in the small dining hall. Resident 50's meal ticket that designated her food preferences and dislikes, was reviewed. The meal ticket listed 4 oz Cottage Cheese under preferences and Turkey under dislikes. Observed Resident 50 eating a turkey sandwich and the meal ticket indicated dislikes turkey and prefers cottage cheese to be served daily. Resident 50 stated she did not like turkey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when trash was found outside on the floor surrounding the dumpsters, and the lids of the dumpsters did not close properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests and cause infection control issues. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 8:41 a.m., an observation was conducted outside back kitchen at dumpster area. There ware three dumpsters, a white color recycle dumpster and another two black color dumpsters for trash. The recycle dumpster's lid and one of the trash dumpster's lids were not close. Trash (used gloves, used fork, napkins, opened cut boxes) was found on floor surrounding the dumpster area. On January 27, 2025, at 9:43 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) outside back kitchen at the dumpster area. The DSS acknowledged trash was found on floor surrounding the dumpster area. The DSS stated dumpsters' lids needed to close properly all the time otherwise would attract pests and cause infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures for one of 19 residents reviewed for infection (Resident 507) who required contact isolation precautions (method to prevent the spread of serious illnesses that can be transmitted by direct or indirect contact), when multiple staff members were observed entering and exiting the resident's room without following contact isolation precautions. This failure had the potential to result in spreading infection to a vulnerable resident population. Findings: On January 29, 2025, at 2:22 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 was observed entering Resident 507's room answering a call light and providing Resident 507 with water. CNA 2 did not wear appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - gown, gloves, mask) while in the room of Resident 507. On January 29, 2025, at 3:32 p.m., CNA 3 was observed entering Resident 507's room to perform vital sign monitoring. CNA 3 did not use a disposable blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure basic accommodations of needs were provided when one of three residents, (Resident 3)'s call light was not within reach. This failure resulted in Resident 3 to be unable to call for assistance. Findings: On July 2, 2024, at 11:58 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility for a complaint investigation was initiated. On July 2, 2024, at 1:42 p.m., observed Resident 3 sitting in a wheelchair at the foot of her bed. Resident 3's call light was wrapped around the right siderail. On July 2, 2024, at 1:42 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated she was unable to reach her call light and could not call for help. On July 2, 2024, at 1:57 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA). The CNA stated that when residents are sitting in wheelchairs their call lights should be within reach. The CNA observed Resident 3's call light and stated that Resident 3's call light was not within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call lights (devices that emit a tone and light up indicating the location of the call, used by the residents to signal a need for assistance from facility staff), were answered timely, when two out of five residents (Residents 1 and 5), who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADLs), verbalized their concerns of facility staff not answering their call lights and/or attending to their needs in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for delayed medical management and unmet care needs. Findings: On April 19, 2024, at 11:09 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a quality-of-care complaint. On April 19, 2024, at 11:24 a.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed. During a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated she was able to get up to the bathroom with staff assistance. Resident 1 stated she would press the call light to get assistance from staff. Resident 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of three trash dumpster lids were securely closed. This failure had the potential to attract pests, insects, and vermin (animals that are believed to carry diseases such as rodents [rats/mice]) which could create an unsanitary environment for the vulnerable residents residing in the facility. Findings: On March 21, 2024, at 10:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for an environmental complaint. On March 21, 2024, at 11:05 a.m., an observation was conducted with the Administrator (Adm) and the Director of Nursing (DON) of the three facility trash dumpsters. One trash dumpster located at the back of the facility, near the kitchen, was observed with the lid open. The trash dumpster had two bags of trash and there were flies flying in and out. The second trash dumpster located across the driveway, near the facility property line by a brick wall, was observed with lid open was for recyclables. The dumpster was observed to be full of broken-down cardboard. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when his arm was held down by a Certified Nurse Aide's (CNA) knee while attempting to dress him. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to physical abuse, which had the potential to result in physical injury, emotional and psychological distress. Findings: On December 11, 2023, at 8:54 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a facility reported incident involving Resident 1. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness), history of falling, cerebral infarction (stroke) and expressive language disorder (a problem with language communication). The MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated October 1, 2023, indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and unclear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, and monitor neuro-checks (a neurologic function assessment tool used to assess and monitor a resident's level of consciousness) on one of four residents (Resident 1), after an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential to result in an unassessed altered level of consciousness (ALOC- state of decreased awareness and/or arousability), and delay of treatment for Resident 1. Findings: On August 24, 2023, at 11:10 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. A record review of Resident 1's medical records indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], at 6:42 p.m., with diagnoses which included history of falls; syncope (Fainting) and collapse; delirium (Mental state of confusion). Resident 1 had a brief stay, of less than 24 hours at the facility, as she was discharged to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on August 9, 2023, at 3:29 p.m., for re-evaluation of ALOC,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a comfortable environment for residents residing in one of the facility's nursing stations (F court nursing station) when temperatures were measured greater than 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure had the potential to result in uncomfortable temperatures for residents residing in F court nursing station. Findings: On July 25, 2023, at 10:37 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 1, she stated her room was warm a couple of days ago. On July 25, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., during an interview with the Administrator (ADM), he stated the facility's air conditioning system began to not blow cool enough air last week. He stated the facility's air conditioning units were overworked. On July 25, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 2, the resident noted to be sitting up at the side of his bed dressed and groomed. He stated the air conditioning went out about a week ago. He stated, It got a little warm. On July 25, 2023, at 11:35 a.m., during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure stored medical supplies were current when expired intravenous (within the vein) medication tubing was found in the facility's medication storage room. This failure had the potential to cause all of the facility's four residents receiving intravenous therapy to be exposed to expired intravenous equipment. Findings: On [DATE], at 10:39 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN)1, in station F court's medication storage room, 20 packets of CareFusion MaxPlus intravenous extension sets with expiration dates of [DATE], was observed. RN 1 stated the extension sets were expired and should have been thrown away. On [DATE], at 10:47 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she reviewed the package of CareFusion MaxPlus intravenous extension set with an expiration date of [DATE], stored in the facility's F court medication storage room. The DON stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the over-the-counter (OTC) medication, hydrogen peroxide (an antiseptic solution) brought by the resident's family member was stored properly and was ordered by the physician for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 14). In addition, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance to their policy and procedure and in accordance with professional standard of practice. This failure had the potential for the hydrogen peroxide to cause irritation of Resident 14's mouth and cause side effects to the resident's teeth and may cause breathing problems if not properly used. Findings: On February 28, 2023, at 11:45 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 14. Resident 14 was observed awake, lying in bed, and able to verbalize her needs. One bottle of 3% (percent - a unit of measurement) hydrogen peroxide was observed on the top of Resident 14's bedside cabinet readily available for use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (a plastic flexible tube inserted into the bladder to collect urine) was monitored and assessed for the presence of sediment (particles or mucus) in the urine for one of two residents reviewed for catheters (Resident 16). This failure had the potential to delay the identification and treatment of a possible urinary tract infection for Resident 16. Findings: On March 1, 2023, at 11:58 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 16, in his room. Resident 16 was observed lying in bed awake, alert, and able to verbalize his needs. Resident 16 was observed with an indwelling urinary catheter attached to the side of his bed. The indwelling urinary catheter tubing was observed with a moderate amount of sediment. Resident 16 stated his catheter had not been changed for a while. On March 1, 2023, at 12 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary food preparation and storage practices were followed when: 1. One box of Tricolor Penne Pasta was left open to air; and 2. Gravy stored in a metal container was readily available for use after the use-by-date had already passed. These failures had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On March 1, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., an observation in the dry storage area was done. One box of Tricolor Penne Pasta was observed open to air. On March 1, 2023, at 9:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated staff should have closed the box properly or thrown the box away. 2. On March 1, 2023, at 10:10 a.m., an observation in the kitchen's refrigerator was conducted. A metal container of gravy with a preparation date of February 26, 2023, and a use-by-date of February 29, 2023 was stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. On March 1, 2023, at 10:12 a.m., an interview was conducted with the DM. The DM confirmed that the metal container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC HOLDING COMPANY 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 06/30/2015 |
| GRANCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/17/2010 |
| MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/17/2010 |
| MHC HOLDING COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/17/2010 |
| MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/17/2010 |
| NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/17/2010 |
| GRUNSTEIN, EMILY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/06/2019 |
| BLACK, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/12/2025 |
| OLIVERA, CLAUDIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/05/2021 |
| SARCAUGA, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| PRESSER, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| MONTEREY PALMS HOLDING COMPANY GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/27/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555403. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.