Fruitvale Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 134.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) received adequate supervision and assistance device to prevent falls when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 transferred Resident 2, who was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living, from wheelchair to bed without another staff present and without using a Hoyer lift (interchangeably used with mechanical lift, uniquely designed electronically operated patient lift to transfer patients between two surfaces, for example from their bed to another surface such as a wheelchair or couch). This failure resulted in Resident 2's fall and transfer to the hospital for a four-day hospitalization for closed displaced subtrochanteric fracture of the right femur (broken bone specifically in the area just below the hip joint, where the fractured pieces are significantly out of alignment, but the skin over the fracture site remains intact, making it a non-open wound). Findings: During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided, consistent with the comprehensive resident-centered plan of care and professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when a scheduled pain medication was not administered according to the physician's order.This failure had the potential to result in ineffective pain management.During a review of Resident 2's Resident Face Sheet (RFS), the RFS indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses that included systemic lupus erythematosus (a chronic autoimmune disease, causing inflammation and tissue damage, with symptoms like joint and muscle pain) and chronic pain syndrome.During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) assessment dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 2 received scheduled and prn (given as needed) pain medication daily, and occasionally experienced pain rated at four out of 10 (zero…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) from physical abuse when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 ' s right shin with a front wheel walker (a walker is an assistive device used to aid in walking, providing stability and reducing weight bearing on the lower extremities of an individual). This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining redness on his right leg, pain, and a transfer to Acute Care Hospital (ACH 1) for follow-up care. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet (A Face Sheet is a summary document that provides essential resident information), the record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2021. The record indicated Resident 1 had diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), unspecified Dementia (a condition that affects memory, thinking, and reasoning, interfering with daily life). During a record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature, which affected 1 (Resident #32) of 4 residents reviewed for food. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Meal Service, indicated, Residents will receive their food at appropriate temperatures and an appetizing appearance; therefore, trays may be set up ahead of time with non-perishable items only. A Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #32 on 11/04/2014. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/01/2024, revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #32 was interviewed on 10/21/2024 at 11:42 AM. Resident #32 stated the food at the facility was not always served hot, and if they were the last one served, the food was cold. During an observation on 10/23/2024 at 8:19 AM, staff passed meal trays on Station 4. The last tray on the food cart was removed from the meal cart at 8:27…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (Resident #17) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility also failed to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks for 1 (Resident #14) of 1 resident observed during incontinence care. Findings included: 1. An undated facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) revealed, 1. EBP shall be used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that may result in transfer of MRDOs [multidrug-resistant organisms] to staff hands and clothing. 2. EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following, to include b. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with an MDRO. Wounds generally include chronic wounds, not shorter-lasting wounds, such as skin breaks or skin tears…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being when psychiatric and mental health services were not provided to treat mental and substance use disorders. This failure had the potential to result in significant distress from unresolved psychosocial and mental health issues. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Resident Face Sheet, the Resident Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave), auditory hallucinations (sensory perceptions of hearing in the absence of an external stimulus) and psychoactive substance abuse (strong desire or sense of compulsion to take psychoactive substance, various natural or synthetic compounds that cause changes in thoughts, emotions and behavior). During a review of Resident 1's Hospitalists…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from verbal abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a staff member used profanity while providing toileting care to Resident 1. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling disrespected by the facility staff. Findings: During a review of the Face Sheet (a document used to communicate basic information about a resident) for Resident 1, undated, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with generalized weakness and hemiplegia (the loss of muscle function on one side of the body) affecting the dominant side of the body. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan) for Resident 1, dated 2/27/24, the record indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident ' s cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from verbal abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) yelled at Resident 1 I will knock you the 'F' out during a verbal altercation. This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, undated, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a loss of brain function that occurs with certain diseases, affecting one or more brain functions such as memory, thinking, language, judgment, or behavior) with behavioral disturbance, adult failure to thrive and opioid dependence (Physical and psychological reliance on opioids, a substance found in certain prescription pain medications and illegal drugs like heroin). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.), dated 1/19/24, the MDS indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not wear gloves and a gown before entering a positive COVID room and did not perform hand hygiene after exiting the room. This failure had the potential for the spread of germs and infection. Findings: During an observation on 2/15/24 at 1:12 p.m. in station 1, there was a transparent plastic shield with a zipper at the door of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The door was wide open behind the shield. There was signage on the door indicating transmission-based precautions for COVID. On the left, attached to the door, were Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable protective gowns, gloves, etc.,). room [ROOM NUMBER] had two residents who were in isolation for COVID 19. CNA 1 was entering room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 1 unzipped the transparent plastic shield, entered the room, and did not wear gloves and a gown. CNA 1 proceeded to Bed B, delivered a food tray to Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions in the kitchen when the solution in two red buckets that contained quaternary ammonium (Quat-a disinfectant) had not been checked and changed for two days. This deficient practice had the potential to spread food borne illnesses. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 12/6/21 at 8:29 a.m., two red buckets that contained a dark, cloudy liquid were observed on the stainless steel counter top near the three way sink. During an interview and concurrent record review with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/6/21 at 8:33 a.m., DM stated the red buckets were sanitation buckets that contained quaternary ammonium solution. DM reviewed the Quat sanitizer log for the red sanitation buckets and stated the log indicated the Quat sanitizer were last checked and changed on 12/4/21 at 6:30 p.m. DM stated the Quat sanitizer in the red buckets should be checked and changed every four hours to prevent the spread of germs. DM stated the Quat solution in the red buckets was used to wipe down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping services and linen services to maintain a clean home-like environment for two of 36 sampled residents (Resident 110 and Resident 128). The wall and ceiling in Resident 128's room was dirty with a reddish-brown splatter stain, and the sheets on Resident 110's bed were thin and full of holes. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 110 and Resident 128 not living in a homelike environment. Findings: 1. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to guide care), for Resident 110, dated 11/15/21, the MDS indicated Resident 110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Section C 0500 of the MDS, the MDS indicated Resident 110 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive assessment tool) of 12 (moderate cognitive impairment). During an interview with concurrent observation with Resident 110 on 12/6/21 at 10:16 a.m., Resident 110 stated they rarely change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$82,691 in federal fines across 15 penalties.

• $8,947 — penalty dated 2024-12-11
• $14,113 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA