Murray Woods Of Journey LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse by another resident for one of three residents (R) (R2 and R1) reviewed. This failure allowed R1 to continue to potentially sexually abuse other residents after his behavior of getting in bed with other residents was first identified.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revised 3/5/2024 revealed under Definitions: Non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Under Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. 1. Review of the electronic medical records (EMR) for R1 revealed he was admitted with diagnoses of major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, document review and review of the facility policy titled, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the residents' needs timely. This failure to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, assistance with dressing and transported to the dining room for meals, timely incontinence care, program of activities, services to prevent further decrease in range of motion/mobility for a resident with contracture had the potential to negatively impact quality of life for all residents.Findings include:Review of the undated Facility Assessment revealed, .Staffing plan: staffing is based on the consideration of all or some of the following: diagnoses, conditions, physical and psychosocial limitations, resident acuity, or any other factor that may affect the services the facility must provide. 1.During the initial tour on 9/28/2025 at 9:00 am, there were no residents in the dining room. [NAME] 1 was asked why no residents were eating in the dining room and stated that the residents had to eat in their rooms because there wasn't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy titled, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods in the walk-in cooler were stored and labeled correctly and dish wear stored under the air conditioner [NAME] were covered and the dish wear inverted. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 107 of 111 residents who received meals prepared in the facility's only kitchen. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Procurement and Storage dated 03/02/23 revealed all leftover food in the cold storage should be dated with an open and discard date, clearly identifying the container contents.During an initial kitchen tour observation on 9/28/2025 at 9:15 am, with the weekend dietary aid , the walk-in cooler contained a large bowl that appeared to be a lettuce salad that was not labeled and/or dated, an open container that appeared to be cream of chicken soup with no label or date, large containers with what appeared to be leftover vegetable soup and leftover tomato…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-10-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy, Administration failed to ensure residents' environment on two of four halls (200, and 400) was clean, in good repair and homelike. Administration failed to ensure residents (R33 and R14) were free from sexual and physical abuse. Administration failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were thoroughly investigated for R33 and reported timely to the State Survey Agency (SSA) (R14 and R12). Administration failed to ensure residents (R53, R59, R12 and R2) care plans were developed for activities with interventions for residents that required diversional activities, activities in their rooms and activities that were appropriate for residents with dementia on the secure unit. Administration failed to ensure residents were provided with activities to meet their needs (R53, R60, R74 and R97). Administration failed to ensure the facility's ice machine and range oven were repaired and functioning which had the potential to affect all residents' mental, physical psychosocial outcomes.Findings include: 1.The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-10-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of the facility policy titled, Equipment the facility to maintain the ice machine and primary oven in working order. Specifically, the ice machine did not provide the ice needed to meet the needs of the residents and family members had to buy ice for the residents, and the primary range oven did not work and could not be used. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 107 of 111 residents who received meals prepared in the facility's only kitchen.Findings include:Review of the undated facility policy titled Equipment, stipulated that all foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order.During an initial kitchen tour interview on 9/28/2025 at 9:15 am, the weekend Dietary Aid reported that the ice machine had been broken and that many times, staff or family members had purchased bagged ice for the residents' the Dietary Aid also stated that the primary range oven in the kitchen was not working for several months and did not know when or if it would be repaired.During an interview on 9/30/2025 at 10:35 am, the Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Activities the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences, a program of activities to support residents in their choice of activities for four of four residents (Resident (R)53, R60, R74, and R97) in the sample of 31 residents and failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents in the facility. This failure had the potential to negatively impact quality of life for the affected residents.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities dated 2/28/2023 indicated, .facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure two of 31 Residents (R)(R39 and R41) were treated with dignity and respect. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R39 was provided with incontinence care when requested and allowed to remain in a soiled brief for over two hours, the facility also failed to ensure R41 was able to have visitation in her room that was free from offensive odors. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised 3/5/2024 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident.Review of R39's undated face sheet, found under the ''admission Record'' tab located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term rehabilitation after a traumatic fall at home with fractures and operative repair of her right elbow, wrist and right knee. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Resident Environmental Quality, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents on two of four halls (200 and 400) in the facility. This failure could negatively impact resident due to not having a sanitary, homelike living environment. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Environmental Quality dated 2/16/2024 indicated, .facility to be designed, constructed, equipped and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for resident.During a tour of the facility on 9/28/2025 at 10:25 am the following was observed: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] in the bedroom, the baseboard was missing on the wall that held the sink leaving an open space between the floor and the sheetrock,2. room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom had floor tile around the base of the toilet that was stained black in color and there were floor tiles that were missing,3. Secure unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure two of four residents (R) (R33 and R14) were free from abuse; R33 from sexual abuse by R57 and R14 from physical abuse by R2.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised 03/2024 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of all residents.'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury, confinement, or punishment with resulting harm or mental anguish.Instances of abuse, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, can cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish.This includes verbal abuse, physical, mental or sexual abuse.this includes sexual abuse with a resident who does not have the capacity to decline to participate in the sexual act.1.Review of the Administrator's investigation file revealed a written statement by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN5) which indicated that on the secure unit on 3/25/2025 at 6:30 am, LPN5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the two hours once the facility was aware of the abuse allegation for two of four residents, Resident (R) (R14 and R12). The failure of the facility to report these incidents timely has the likelihood to lead to future unreported allegations of resident abuse.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised on 3/5/2024, revealed the facility would implement policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent all types of abuse and neglect, Notify the appropriate agencies immediately: as soon as possible, but no later than.2 hours after discovery or forming suspicion.1.Review of R2's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,092 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,092 — penalty dated 2024-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $513K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA