Kirtland Woods Of Journey
9685 Chillicothe Rd, Kirtland, OH 44094 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 177 certified beds · (440) 256-8100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $162,637 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (78%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.8%CMS range 33.6–61.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.4–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.2–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 177 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 33% occupied, or roughly 118 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide comprehensive, individualized, and sufficient eye care for Resident #104. This affected one resident (#104) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 120. Actual Harm occurred on 04/22/24 when Resident #104, who was admitted on [DATE] with severe cognitive impairment and was known to use contact lenses, developed right eye redness and pain and was diagnosed with conjunctivitis (pink eye) which required antibiotic treatment due to a lack of routine eye care for the resident. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 11/03/23 with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, aphasia (inability to understand and express language), restlessness and agitation, psychotic disorder with delusions, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #104's plan of care initiated 11/06/23 revealed no focus on eye care or the care of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate assistance, supervision and/or assistive devices to prevent falls and consistently implement fall interventions for Resident #57 and Resident #101. Actual harm occurred on 04/14/24 when Resident #57, who was moderately cognitively impaired and required two staff assist with bed mobility, sustained a fall out of bed when being provided hands on care by only one staff member. The resident sustained a right shoulder fracture as a result of the fall. This affected two residents (#57 and #101) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 120. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, diabetes, high blood pressure, osteoporosis, and anxiety. A new diagnosis of right shoulder fracture was added on 04/14/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, facility policy and procedure review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review and facility investigation review, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly transferred, as per their plan of care and/or physician's order to prevent actual injury and/or potential injury. Actual Harm occurred on [DATE] when Resident #125 who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) and required a mechanical lift (device used to transfer a person from one place to another) of two staff assist for transfers was transferred by only one staff, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #614 without a mechanical lift from his bed to his wheelchair. The resident was again transferred on [DATE] by STNA #680 and STNA #685 without a mechanical lift from his wheelchair to his bed. After breakfast on [DATE] STNA #637 pulled back the covers for Resident #125 and noticed he had a large red swollen area to his left hip, purple bruising to his pelvic region and yellow tinted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat potentially contagious/communicable rashes per physician orders, failed to timely implement transmission-based precautions to prevent spreading the rash to other residents, failed to implement exposure control measures, failed to educate and in service staff on infection control relative to preventing the spread of potentially contagious/communicable rashes, failed to report the outbreak to the local health department, and failed to prohibit State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #373, who exhibited signs of a potentially communicable/contagious rash, from direct resident contact. Actual Harm occurred on 07/26/23 when Resident #61, who was evaluated for a body rash by his Primary Care Physician (PCP) #400 on 07/25/23 and ordered permethrin cream (a topical treatment used to treat scabies caused by the itch mite Sarcoptes scabiei which is a highly contagious skin condition) to be administered on 07/26/23 to treat the body rash, did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-05 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of personnel files, the Social Services Director job description, the Facility Assessment, and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified full time licensed social worker (LSW) as required. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 58 residents living in the facility.Findings include:Interviews conducted on 04/28/26 at 2:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) #526 and Regional Nurse #568 confirmed that the facility, licensed for 180 beds, had not employed an LSW since 11/05/25. The DON stated that, following the departure of LSW #571, department heads had been performing social work duties. She also reported reaching out to a Social Worker at another facility for guidance; however, this off-site Social Worker did not complete or sign any work for the facility. Both the DON and the Regional Nurse confirmed that no LSW had provided services in any capacity since 11/05/25.A review of the personnel record for Former LSW #571 showed her last day worked was 11/05/25.The Facility Assessment updated on 01/05/26 indicated that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents or their responsible parties when resident personal fund accounts reached within $200 of the Medicaid resource limit, as required by regulation. This failure affected four of the six residents reviewed for personal funds (Residents #1, #22, #50, and #59). The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. Review of banking records for Resident #1 showed a balance of $20,702.70, exceeding the Medicaid resource limit of $2,000 as of 05/01/26.No documentation was found indicating the resident or responsible party was notified of the need to spend down funds.2. Review of the banking records for Resident #22 showed a balance of $6,007.89, exceeding the Medicaid resource limit as of 05/01/26.No documentation was found indicating the resident or responsible party was notified of the need to spend down funds.3. Review of the banking records for Resident #50 showed a balance of $24,237.64, exceeding the Medicaid resource limit as of 05/01/26.No documentation was found indicating the resident or responsible party…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of the Housekeeping Daily Checklists, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide residents with a clean, safe, sanitary, and homelike environment as required. The facility did not ensure Resident #36's room was maintained in a clean condition, as evidenced by a stained window curtain that remained unaddressed despite multiple resident requests and observations by staff. Additionally, the memory care unit dining and common areas were kept clean, sanitary, and properly maintained. This affected one resident (#36) being directly affected out of seven residents reviewed for physical environment and had the potential to impact all 23 residents (#4, #6, #7, #10, #12, #13, #15, #16, #18, #22, #23, #25, #26, #28, #32, #33, #43, #46, #50, #52, #54, #55, and #58) in the memory care unit. The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. During an interview on 04/27/26 at 10:52 A.M., Resident #36 reported that his window curtain was dirty. He stated he had requested multiple times that staff clean the curtain, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure routine care plan conferences were conducted. This affected six residents (#11, #13, #14, #22, #32, #49) out of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings include:1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of osteoarthritis bilateral knees, squamous cell carcinoma of skin, basal cell carcinoma of face, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, need for assistance with personal care. Review of medical record revealed Resident #13's last care conference was completed on 07/02/25 by Former Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #571. No other care conferences were performed after July 2025. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating Resident #13 had intact cognition. The functional assessment revealed the resident required assistance and cueing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Social Services Director job description and interviews, the facility failed to provide medically related social services necessary for residents to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being. The facility had no Licensed Social Worker (LSW) providing or overseeing required social services for more than five months, resulting in missed care conferences, absence of required resident and representative involvement in care planning and failure to notify residents or representatives when personal fund accounts exceeded Medicaid limits. This affected nine residents (#13, #14, #22, #32, #49, #11, #1, #50, and #59) of 25 sampled residents and had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. The facility's census was 58.Findings include:During an interview on 04/28/26 at 2:50 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) #526 and Regional Nurse #568 confirmed the facility is licensed for 180 beds and the facility had not employed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were fed in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#19) of four residents who were identified as needing assistance with meal intake. The facility census was 58.Findings include:A review of medical records for Resident #19 revealed the date of admission as 01/12/23. Significant diagnoses included unspecified dementia, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance mood disturbance or anxiety, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and need for assistance with personal care. Significant orders included regular diet, mechanical soft texture, nectar thick liquids. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had a severe cognitive deficit and was rarely understood. The assessment also revealed Resident #19 was dependent on staff for eating.A care plan dated 02/25/26 revealed Resident #19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, interview, review the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Certification, Licensure and Survey System (CALS) website, and review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) and policy review, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse. This affected one resident (Resident #6) of six residents who were reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 58.Findings include:Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] with significant diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain and vascular dementia with agitation, and was placed on the secured unit with behavior monitoring for anxiety, depression, agitation, physical and verbal behaviors, delusions, hallucinations, refusals, and attention seeking, with interventions such as redirection, environmental changes, diversion, food and fluids, toileting, and limit setting. Medication orders included multiple Depakote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and dressing changes were performed. This affected one (Resident #35) out of four residents reviewed for pressure and non-pressure skin conditions. The facility census was 58.Findings include:Resident #35 was admitted to facility on 01/30/26 with diagnoses of non-displaced fracture of lateral malleolus right fibula (ankle fracture), chronic osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, cellulitis right lower limb, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, depression, obesity, and need for assistance with personal care.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating Resident #35 was cognitively intact. The functional assessment revealed the resident needed set up for upper body activities of daily living (ADL) and required one staff assist for lower body ADL, hygiene, transferring and mobility.Interview with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and document individualized trauma triggers and coping mechanisms for a resident with a diagnosed trauma related disorder. This affected one resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for mood/behavior. The facility census was 58.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes hypertension, congestive heart failure, non-rheumatic aorta insufficiency, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the plan revealed Resident #3 was a trauma survivor related to military service with a goal that coping mechanisms would be identified. The interventions included identifying triggers related to past trauma; however, none were identified in the care plan.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was moderately cognitively impaired and required maximal assistance for toileting and transfers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to appropriately dispose of biohazardous materials and handle clean and soiled linen to prevent the spread of infection. This affected eight residents (#1, #8, #13, #24, #40, #58, #73 and #77) and had the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 07/22/24 at 8:53 A.M. the adjoining bathroom shared by Residents #8, #13, #58 and #77 revealed a feces soiled pillowcase crumpled on the bathroom floor next to the toilet. Interview at the time of the observation with State tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #488 confirmed the finding. Observation on 07/22/24 at 11:20 A.M. of the laundry room with Housekeeping District Manager (HDM) #611 revealed a pile of soiled linens placed on the floor in front of the middle washer which was not functioning and filled with washed linen. There were two wall mounted fans on in the clean laundry area, one blowing air toward the dryers and the other blowing air toward the folded and hanging linens/clothes. Both fans were visibly dirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment. This affected 48 residents (#3, #6, #7, #8, #13, #15, #16, #17, #19, #21, #23, #24, #27, #31, #32, #34, #35, #37, #38, #39, #42, #44, #46, #47, #49, #51, #55, #58, #59, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #88, #89, #92, #93, #95, #97, #100 and #102) and had the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 07/17/24 at 10:49 A.M. of the adjoining bathroom shared by Residents #8, #13, #58, and #77 revealed a sticky floor and a toilet paper roll placed on the back of the toilet in lieu of a toilet paper holder, which was not secured tightly to the wall. The toilet water was low inside the commode with a large amount of soiled toilet paper, black/brown in color piled inside, and black/brown soilage dried around the inner commode walls. Residents #13 and #77's shared bedroom closet was missing a handle to functionally open/close the door with only a pointed screw protruding from it, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-29 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a private closet space separate from roommates' clothing. This affected 46 residents (#1, #2, #4, #6, #7, #8, #11, #13, #16, #20, #22, #23, #27, #31, #34, #35, #41, #42, #44, #47, #50, #51, #58, #59, #61, #64, #69, #73, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #86, #88, #92, #93, #94, #97, #98, #100, #102 and #103) out of 103 resident rooms reviewed for closet space. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Observations on 07/23/24 at 10:43 A.M. during a facility tour with Maintenance Director (MD) #474 revealed the following residents were roommates and had one closet shared by both residents that did not separate the roommates' clothing: • Residents #78 and #80 • Residents #100 and #16 • Residents #77 and #13 • Residents #84 and #44 • Residents #58 and #8 • Residents #31 and #47 • Residents #93 and #35 • Residents #98 and #61 • Residents #20 and #64 • Residents #50 and #11 • Residents #4 and #94 • Residents #82 and #59 • Residents #23 and #102 • Residents #73 and #1 • Residents #27 and #79 • Residents #7 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and interview the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse for residents #41 and #104. This affected two residents (#41 and #104) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for the Former Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and dementia with agitation. The resident was at the facility for a respite stay. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/20/24, revealed Resident #104 had severely impaired cognition. The resident's hearing and vision were adequate without devices. Behaviors included physical behavioral symptoms directed at others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed at others, other behavioral symptoms not directed at others, and rejection of care. Review of physician orders for June 2024 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document fall interventions for Resident #62 and make vaccination documentation readily accessible in the medical record for Residents #97 and #102. This affected three residents (#62, #97 and #102) of 23 medical records reviewed. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 06/19/24 indicated Resident #62 had moderately impaired cognition and received hospice services. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order initiated 12/01/23 and effective July 2024 indicated Resident #62 was to have a floor mat to the left bedside while in bed. Observation on 07/17/24 at 11:50 A.M. revealed Resident #62 was in bed with no fall mat to the left bedside as ordered. Interview at the time of the observation with State Tested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0910 — isolatedEnsure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate bathroom door for privacy for Resident #25. This affected one resident (#25) of 103 residents whose rooms were observed for privacy. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Observations on 07/23/24 at 10:43 A.M. during a facility tour with Maintenance Director (MD) #474 revealed Resident #25's room had a bathroom entrance with a full-length curtain installed to cover the doorway in lieu of a door. The curtain was placed on a rod which extended approximately two to three inches away from the wall/door opening so when the curtain was drawn completely closed, it left a wide gap on both sides leaving ample opening to see inside the bathroom. With Resident #25's bedroom door opened and the bathroom curtain closed, the inside bathroom remained visible through the left bathroom curtain gap from the facility hallway outside of the bedroom. Interview at the time of the observation with MD #474 verified the findings. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 110 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observations on 06/17/24 between 11:03 A.M. and 11:14 A.M. of the East wing revealed the window at the east end of the East wing was open, hot air was blowing in, grayish-black spots were noted on the seals of the window and along the top and bottom edges of the top and bottom windowpanes, there were multiple tears in the screen, and at least 25 dead insects on the windowsill. The light fixtures in the East halls contained multiple dark spots, some shaped like insects, under the fixture covers. Further observation of the common sitting area on the East wing revealed windows were on the north and south side of the room, each side had a window open, blowing hot air into the facility. Closer observation of the sitting area on the East wing revealed one window with no screen,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach at all times. This affected one (Resident #86) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 08/12/21 with diagnoses including visual hallucinations, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema, asthma, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/20/24 revealed Resident #86 had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #86 had an impairment on one side, was dependent for toileting and bathing, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required maximal assistance for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 06/13/24 revealed Resident #86 required assistance with incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure choices were honored for one (Resident #86) of five residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 08/12/21with diagnoses including visual hallucinations, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema, asthma, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/20/24 revealed Resident #86 had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #86 had an impairment on one side, was dependent for toileting and bathing, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required maximal assistance for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 06/13/24 revealed Resident #86 had an alteration in physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the National Weather Service website (forcast.weather.gov) the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and safe ambient temperature for all residents. This affected one of five sampled residents, Resident #73. Findings include: Observations on 06/17/24 between 11:03 A.M. and 11:14 A.M. of the East wing revealed the window at the east end of the East wing was open, hot air was blowing into the building. Further observation of the common sitting area on the East wing revealed windows were on the north and south side of the room, each side had a window open, blowing hot air into the facility. Interview on 06/17/24 at 11:08 A.M. with Housekeeper #398 confirmed hot air was blowing into the facility from the open window on the east end of East wing. A follow-up interview with Housekeeper #398 on 06/17/24 at 11:25 A.M. confirmed there were screens coming loose and with tears and there was hot air coming into the facility from the open windows., Observation on 06/17/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete annual nurse aide performance evaluations as required. This had the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #536 revealed a hire date of 03/07/23. There was no evidence in the personnel file of an annual performance evaluation as required. Review of the personnel file for STNA #537 revealed a hire date of 03/14/23. There was no evidence in the personnel file of an annual performance evaluation as required. Review of the personnel file for STNA #507 revealed a hire date of 04/25/23. There was no evidence in the personnel file of an annual performance evaluation as required. Interview on 05/01/24 at 12:17 P.M. with Human Resource Business Partner #560 verified the above findings were accurate. Review of the facility policy titled Staff Competency, dated 12/31/23, revealed the facility would ensure nurse aides were competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store injectable pharmaceuticals by dating opened containers and failed to maintain clean medication storage refrigerators. This was identified in two of four medication rooms and one of six medication carts which affected one resident (#61) and had the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: During medication storage observation on 04/25/24 at 1:48 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) the [NAME] medication cart contained one opened and undated insulin pen (Humalog KwikPen) for Resident #61. Both the [NAME] and Central medication room refrigerators had gross overgrowth of ice from lack of defrosting. The Central medication room refrigerator contained one opened and undated vial of Tuberculin purified protein derivative (Tubersol) solution for intradermal tuberculin testing. Interview at the time of the observation with DON verified the above findings and indicated Tubersol was used for tuberculin testing on residents and employees. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures. This affected four residents (#37, #59, #63, and #107) and had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Interview on 04/22/24 at 12:09 P.M. with Resident #59 revealed the food was terrible, and the hot food was not served hot. Interview on 04/22/24 at 3:14 P.M. with Resident #37 revealed the meals were served cold. Observation on 04/24/24 at 4:17 P.M. revealed Dietary Assistant (DA) #552 obtained food temperatures for dinner from the steam table in the kitchen. The barbeque beef riblet were 188 degrees Fahrenheit, and the baked beans were 160 degrees Fahrenheit. At 5:37 P.M. a test tray was placed on the last meal cart delivered to the 100-hall. The staff immediately began passing the hall trays. At 6:07 P.M. the last meal tray was served, and the test tray was performed with Dietary Manager (DM) #613. DM #613 obtained the temperature of the barbeque beef riblet which was 97 degrees Fahrenheit, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen and nursing unit refrigerators. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Observations on 04/22/24 from 8:54 A.M. to 9:24 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) #613 revealed: • An opened, bulk bag of panko sitting on the floor in the dry storage area. • The table where the coffee maker was located revealed the back wall was dirty with various dried food splatter. The three drawers of this table that contained the serving utensils including scoops, spoons, and spatulas, the inside of the drawers was dirty with dark brownish food stains/debris. • The prep sink where the toaster was located revealed the back wall and the silver portion of the table that extended up on the wall had various dried food splatter. The shelf underneath where the cutting boards were located had dried white stains or water spots and various dried food splatter. • The dish room had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention review and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete admission testing for tuberculosis (TB) for Resident #419. This affected one resident (#419) of seventeen residents reviewed for new admissions. In addition, the facility failed to accurately complete the new hire testing for TB on five new employee (Maintenance Director #594, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #591, LPN #571, Human Resource Business Partner (HRBP) #560, and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #504) of 11 new hire personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #419 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease dependent on dialysis, heart disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, multiple myeloma, and diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the contracted quotes, the facility failed to ensure the washers and dryers were in good repair. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Observations on 05/01/24 from 8:48 A.M. to 9:03 A.M. of the laundry area with Housekeeping Manager (HM) #611 revealed in the room with the washing machines revealed a large bin filled to the top with soiled personal clothes and another bin with linens both waiting to be washed. Two of three washing machines were in use, both with linens. The third washing machine was not being used. In the next room over, two of four dryers were being used to dry linens. Interview on 05/01/24 between 8:48 A.M. and 9:03 A.M. with HM #611 verified there was one washing machine and one dryer that did not work. HM #611 stated the washing machine had been down for about seven months, and it was to be fixed but parts could not be found due to the fact that it was an old machine. HM #611 stated he was then told it was to be replaced, but he had not heard anything else…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 04/22/24 at 12:09 P.M. with Resident #59 stated there was a breeze from the window, and maintenance had taped a plastic covering around the window but did not securely tape it in place. Resident #59 stated at night while in bed she feels the breeze and has to bundle up at night. Observation at this time of a clear, plastic covering taped over the window except in the lower left side corner, closer to the resident's bed. Observation on 04/22/24 at 12:29 P.M. of an odor of urine on the 100-hall near the nursing station. Interview at this time with Stated Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #528 verified the odor of urine and stated it was new as of today. STNA #528 stated housekeeping had been through the rooms and everyone was checked and changed. STNA #528…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0924 — widespreadPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure handrails were in good repair. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Observation on 04/25/24 at 11:13 A.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #593 of the missing portion of the handrail across from the 300-hall dining/activity area and right next to the area where the puzzles were kept. Interview at this time with MA #593 verified the observation and stated he did not how long it had been that way but would get it fixed. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00153331 and Complaint Number OH00153001.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete the required 12 hours of annual training for nurse aides. This had the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #537 revealed a hire date of 03/14/23. There was no evidence any training was completed toward the required minimum of 12 hours annually. Review of the personnel file for STNA #507 revealed a hire date of 04/25/23. There was no evidence any training was completed toward the required minimum of 12 hours annually. Interview on 05/01/24 at 12:17 P.M. with Human Resource Business Partner #560 verified the above findings were accurate. Review of the facility policy titled Staff Competency, dated 12/31/23, revealed the facility would ensure nurse aides were competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00153001.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure Resident Fund Authorizations were witnessed. This affected six of six residents (#41, #63, #76, #83, and #220) whose fund accounts were reviewed. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the authorization forms for Resident Fund Accounts for six residents (#41, #63, #76, #83, and #220) revealed none had been witnessed as required. Interview on 04/30/24 at 3:38 P.M. Business Office Manager #506 verified the facility had not had the Resident Fund Account authorization forms witnessed.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed accurately for Residents #3, #8, #9, #14, #15, #20, #33, #36, #37, #39, #40, #48, #52, #53, #55, #62, #65, #68, #73, #76, #78, #80, #82, #85, #88, #91, #93, #95, #97, #98, #99, #103, #104, #105, #107, #108, #112, #114, #317, #319 and #1070. This affected 41 residents (#3, #8, #9, #14, #15, #20, #33, #36, #37, #39, #40, #48, #52, #53, #55, #62, #65, #68, #73, #76, #78, #80, #82, #85, #88, #91, #93, #95, #97, #98, #99, #103, #104, #105, #107, #108, #112, #114, #317, #319 and #1070) of 42 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behaviors, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, legal blindness, schizophrenia, and a stroke. Review of the physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with a summary of their baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This affected four residents (#105, #114, #418, and #419) of 32 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with severe agitation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, diabetes, traumatic brain injury, and an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed no information regarding the resident or his responsible party being provided information regarding his care plan within 48 hours of admission. Review of the admission assessment for Resident #105 dated 10/10/23 revealed no information regarding formulation of a care plan for the resident. Interview with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Director #596 on 04/29/24 at 10:44 A.M. revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on immunization reviews, staff interview, and education review, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 education and vaccination opportunities for five staff members (State Tested Nursing Assistant [STNA] #509, [NAME] #548, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #588, LPN #590, and Registered Nurse [RN] #599) of five staff members reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. The facility census was 120. Findings Include: 1. STNA #509's date of hire was 08/25/21. COVID-19 immunization dates were 11/18/21 and 12/22/21. No evidence was provided regarding education being provided or if the vaccine was offered when booster doses became available. The status of the immunization was listed as past due. 2. [NAME] #548's date of hire was 03/21/23. No information was provided regarding if the employee had been educated and offered the COVID-19 vaccination. The status of the immunization was listed as past due. 3. LPN #588's date of hire was 11/01/19. COVID-19 immunization date provided was 03/23/22. No evidence was provided regarding education being provided or if the vaccine was offered when booster…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to formulate comprehensive care plans to include all necessary goals of care for Residents #21, #37 and #104. This affected three residents (#21, #37 and #104) of 29 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 03/28/24. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, type II diabetes mellitus, borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had an intact cognition and PTSD listed as a diagnosis. There was no care plan in the medical record related to diagnoses of PTSD. Interviews on 04/29/24 at 9:24 A.M. and at 10:43 A.M. with MDS Director #596 stated they obtained their information from staff and interview with the residents. MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to revise Resident #62's care plan in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#62) of 32 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behaviors, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, legal blindness, schizophrenia, and a stroke. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #62 revealed she was admitted to hospice services on 09/18/22 for vascular dementia with cerebral vascular disease. Review of the comprehensive quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was severely cognitively impaired and was rarely understood. She demonstrated physical behaviors towards others, verbal behaviors directed at others, and rejected care one to three days of the assessment reference period. The resident was dependent on staff for all care. Review of the progress notes revealed on 03/12/24 her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the activity log, activity evaluation, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided consistently according to the care plan and resident preferences for Resident #70. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 04/28/23. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and schizophrenia. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had impaired cognition. The assessment also indicated under activities it was very important to listen to music he likes, be around animals, to do things with groups of people, to do favorite activities, go outside for fresh air when the weather is good, and participate in religious services. The primary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the menu, the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was served finger food items per physician's orders. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 04/28/23. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had impaired cognition. The assessment indicated the resident required set up or clean up assistance with eating, weighed 140 pounds, had unplanned weight loss, and did not receive a therapeutic or mechanically altered diet. Review of the care plan dated 03/08/24 revealed monitor Resident #70 for potential nutritional problem related to diagnoses of dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess residents for influenza or pneumonia immunization status upon admission to the facility. This affected two residents (#104 and #105) of 17 residents reviewed for new admission to the facility. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, a stroke, dementia, anxiety, depression, bipolar disease, psychotic disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #104 was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance for personal care. Review of the immunization status for Resident #104 revealed the resident had tuberculosis testing upon admission but there was no information on the status of influenza or pneumonia immunization status. On 05/01/24 at 12:14 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17 was free from an incident of staff to resident abuse. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse prohibition. The total census was 125. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, delusional disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Record review revealed a 09/14/23 progress note indicating staff identified bruising to the resident's hands and notified the unit manager and physician. A 09/14/23 skin assessment revealed the resident had bruising to her bilateral hands with no measurement. Progress notes on 09/21/23 and 09/30/23 revealed the bruising faded substantially over this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to effectively implement their abuse policy to prevent and timely report an incident of abuse involving Resident #17. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse prohibition. The total census was 125. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 06/23/23 with diagnoses including dementia, delusional disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), dated 09/14/23 revealed the facility reported an allegation of physical abuse to the State agency involving Resident #17 on 09/14/23 at 4:30 P.M. Staff were made aware of the event at 8:00 P.M. on 09/13/23, and the administrator was informed on 09/14/23 at 4:30 P.M. A witness statement by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #203 revealed on 09/13/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 117 residents receiving meals from the kitchen excluding . Zero residents in the facility were identified as not eating any foods by mouth. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Observation of the facility kitchen on 08/21/23 at 10:20 A. M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #399 revealed the entire perimeter of the kitchen floor where the walls met the floor contained heavy collections of food crumbs, particles of food, black and brown stains and grime with highest build up behind large equipment and food preparation tables. In the dish room there were two large trash cans full of food and the trash cans and lids were heavily soiled with dried on food splatter. There were small black insects flying around these cans. Underneath the dish machine was evidence of the floor not being properly swept and mopped, as there was a large build up of yellow and brown staining with multiple pieces of food and food particle build up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to keep the facility reasonably free from insects and pests with the potential to affect all 117 residents. The facility census was 117 . Findings include: Review of a service report from the pest control company, dated 03/22/23, contained special instructions at the bottom of the report that stated Employee sanitation practices need improvement. Please ensure employees are following the proper sanitation guidelines mandated by your facility. Mop sink and buckets should be emptied after use to help prevent pests. Observation on 08/21/23 from 8:41 A.M. to 9:28 A.M. of the resident common areas, hallways, dining areas and laundry rooms revealed evidence of living and dead pests in the facility. The floors in the main dining and activity room had food residue, dead flies and spider webs with eggs by the baseboards and behind the piano. The laundry room had moist walls with black staining. There was dirty trash piled high and used dirty gloves scattered on the floor. Laundry aid #405 verified about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for Resident #61 when Resident #61 did not receive the ordered treatment of permethrin cream (treatment used for scabies caused by the itch mite Sarcoptes scabiei which produces a highly contagious skin rash) on the date of 07/26/23 when it should have been administered to Resident #61. This affected one resident (Resident #61) out of seven residents (Resident #26, #36, #54, #61, #62, #96, and #103) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 117. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 01/13/23 and diagnoses included psychosis, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and revealed Resident #61 was cognitively impaired as his brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was a nine. He required supervision only with bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of a nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to serve meals at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Interview on 07/17/23 at 10:19 A.M. with Resident #100 revealed food was not very warm at times. Interview on 07/17/23 at 11:00 A.M. with Resident #61 revealed food was not always warm enough. Observation on 07/18/23 at 7:03 A.M. revealed the breakfast tray line started. The last cart of resident trays left the kitchen at 8:03 A.M. and arrived on the 100 unit at 8:05 A.M. The last resident food tray was passed at 8:21 A.M. A test tray conducted on 07/18/23 at 8:22 A.M. with Food Service Director (FD) #228 revealed the scrambled eggs were 107 degrees Fahrenheit. FD # 228 confirmed she wished the scrambled eggs were hotter. Review of facility food council meeting minutes from 04/17/23 to 07/17/23. Some initial concerns related to taste and temperature were expressed on 04/17/23. Review of the revised facility policy dated October 2017 titled Food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a building-specific legionella assessment in place. This had the potential to affect all 117 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility legionella prevention documentation revealed the facility did not have a building-specific assessment identifying where legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility water system. These findings were verified with the Administrator on 07/20/23 at 2:09 P.M.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a sanitary condition and in good repair and failed to ensure the common bathroom on the secured memory care unit (SMCU) was maintained in a sanitary condition. This finding affected one resident (#88) and had the potential to affect an additional 42 residents who reside on the SMCU including Residents #4, #6, #7, #8, #11, #12, #17, #20, #29, #30, #32, #36, #37, #38, #41, #48, #50, #52, #53, #55, #64, #68, #69, #70, #76, #77, #78, #80, #83, #85, #89, #91, #93, #95, #97, #99, #102, #105, #106, #109, #162 and #163. Findings include: 1. Interviews on 07/17/23 at 12:29 P.M. with Resident #88's daughter and son-in-law indicated the bathroom toilet had a toilet seat riser in place, and stool was observed on the rim and outer bowl of the toilet, the closet door was not on the track and had been broken for approximately one year, and the nightstand's second drawer that was broken. Observation on 07/17/23 at 12:45 P.M. with Maintenance Assistant #209 confirmed Resident #88's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #162 was transferred according to the physician's order and failed to ensure Resident #107's fall investigations were completed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place as well as new interventions implemented. This finding affected two residents (#107 and #162) of three residents reviewed for transfers and falls. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #162's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including other Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #162's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment and required extensive two person assist for transfers and toileting. Review of Resident #162's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/30/23 for two staff member assist during transfers every shift. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents. This finding affected Residents #99 and #162 and had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing on the secured memory care unit (SMCU) including Residents #4, #6, #7, #8, #11, #12, #17, #20, #29, #30, #32, #36, #37, #38, #41, #48, #50, #52, #53, #55, #64, #68, #69, #70, #76, #77, #78, #80, #83, #85, #88, #89, #91, #93, #95, #97, #99, #102, #105, #106, #109, #162 and #163. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #99's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited a memory problem and required extensive one person assist for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene as well as extensive two person assist for transfers and toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate oral care for Resident #71 and failed to document refusals. This affected one resident (#71) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 117. Findings include: Observation of Resident #71 on 07/17/23 at 11:35 A.M. revealed Resident #71 sitting in a common room. She had brown teeth with a noticeable moist film on them and a crusty orange substance on her teeth and lips. She was not interviewable. Record review of Resident #71 revealed she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, macular degeneration, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 06/14/23 revealed Resident #71 was rarely or never understood, required extensive assistance for personal hygiene, and received hospice services. She was care planned for refusing oral care; however, review of the progress notes and hygiene care documentation revealed no documented evidence of refusals of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #99 was provided timely care. This finding affected one resident (#99) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #99's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited a memory problem and required extensive one person assist for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene as well as extensive two person assist for transfers and toilet use. Observation on 07/17/23 at 10:09 A.M. revealed Resident #99 was in the common television lounge on the secured memory care unit (SMCU). He was observed in a reclined Broda chair sleeping with music on the television. Observation on 07/17/23 at 12:12 P.M. revealed Resident #99 was moved from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-05-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement policy and procedure for the prevention of abuse by not completing job reference checks and documenting timely state nurse aide registry (NAR) checks for new employees. This had the potential affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #516 revealed a hire date of 06/13/23. There was no evidence in the personnel file of completed job reference checks. Review of the personnel file for Receptionist #597 revealed a hire date of 06/27/23. The printed evidence of Receptionist #597 being checked against the NAR was not dated. There was no evidence the NAR check was timely, and there was no evidence in the personnel file of completed job reference checks. Review of the personnel file for Registered Nurse (RN) #600 revealed a hire date of 07/11/23. The printed evidence of RN #600 being checked against the NAR was not dated. There was no evidence the NAR check was timely, and there was no evidence in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$162,637 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $162,637 — penalty dated 2024-05-02
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-30 for 83 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOURNEY CZ OF OH LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2024 |
| JOURNEY CZ OH HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2024 |
| JOURNEY CZ MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| DONCA, MIHAELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| MCGUINNESS, BERNARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| 3 BEES HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| AJOJ HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| BEES FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| BLUE OCEAN TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| SHASAM FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| SHASAM HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2024 |
| DUGGAN, PAMELA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/23/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365290. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.