No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tucker Park Crossing of Journey LLC

4608 Lawrenceville Highway, Tucker, GA 30084 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 144 certified beds · (770) 491-9444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (770) 491-9444 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
2926 Mountain Industrial Blvd NW · (678) 971-2020 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4744 N Royal Atlanta Dr Ste C · (678) 226-1758 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4823 N Royal Atlanta Dr · (770) 493-7788 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4408 Lawrenceville Hwy · (678) 464-0962 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4600 N Royal Atlanta Dr · (678) 615-7745

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-03 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms68.7%11.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.6%20.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.8%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.4%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.9%19.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine38.5%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%25.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%11.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.912.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.461.901.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.0%CMS range 30.9–62.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge60.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.7–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
90.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 131.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program F880, F880 Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and Wound Care Guidelines the facility failed to provide a Legionella water program, use aseptic technique during wound care, ensure proper use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents who were under enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during medication administration, identify and prevent the spread of C-Diff (clostridium difficile) colitis, and to clean and maintain respiratory equipment properly. This deficient practice had the potential to cause widespread infection, food-borne illness, and widespread C-Diff colitis and could affect all 129 residents who resided at the facility.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, F 880 Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) revised April 2025 revealed the facility's expectation Appropriate precautions will be taken when caring for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by not cleaning the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) filter in six rooms (Room D-16, Room D-12, Room D-15, Room E-52, Room D-15, and Room E41) on five of five halls sampled. This deficient practice had the potential to cause respiratory irritation and exacerbation of conditions in residents with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other related lung diseases.Findings include:Observation on 01/27/2026 at 11:45 AM in room D16 revealed that the PTAC unit had two filters, and both filters observed to have a grey fuzzy substance approximately 1/8 inch thick, covering the filter.Observation on 01/27/2026 at 12:00 PM of resident rooms D12 and D15 revealed that both PTAC units in these rooms had 2 filters, and both filters in each unit were covered with a grey fuzzy substance that made the filters opaque.Observation on 01/27/2026 at 12:17 PM of resident room E52 revealed that both filters in the PTAC unit were covered with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Exercise of Rights/Resident Rights F550 and Residents Rights, the facility failed to allow one resident (R) (38) to exercise their rights in the facility by making her own choices.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Exercise of Rights/Resident Rights F550, revised November 2025, section titled Policy Statement documented, Our residents have the right to be treated with respect and dignity and care that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Our residents have the right to exercise their rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility and will be supported by our community in the exercise of those rights. 13. C. Allowing residents unrestricted access to common areas open to the public, unless this poses a safety risk for the resident.Review of the policy titled Residents Rights revised November 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) F644, F645, F646, the facility failed to assess and refer residents whose diagnosis qualified for PASARR II evaluation for one of three residents (R) (R68) reviewed for PASARR. This deficient practice had the potential to cause R68 not receive the appropriate treatment and placement for mental illness.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), revised November 2016, revealed in Section 3: Residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders will be referred for appropriate services based upon their assessed needs.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses, including but not limited to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and muscle weakness.Review of R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policies titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Wandering, Unsafe Resident, the facility failed to develop a care plan regarding wandering and elopement risk for one residents (R) (R62) who had been assessed for wandering upon admission. The deficient practice had the potential for R62's needs not to be met. Findings include:Review of the policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised March 2025, section; Policy revealed An individualized comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental, cultural, and psychosocial needs is developed for each resident. Guidelines: . 2. The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment that includes but is not limited to, the MDS (Minimum Data Set) and physician orders. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change.Review of the policy titled Wandering, Unsafe Resident, revised October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and family interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, the facility failed to assess and report changes in condition to the provider for one of 61 sampled residents (R) (R138). The deficient practice led to R138 being hospitalized .Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised November 2017, under Policy Interpretation and Implementation, section1revealed: The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's attending Physician or On-Call Physician, and consistent with the delegation, the resident's representative, when there has been: . b. A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, including a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status, in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R138 was admitted to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, F 689 Accidents and F 689 Accidents-Elopement, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards for three of 61 sampled residents (R) (R45, R78, R92) and failed to maintain a safe environment to prevent resident elopement for one of 14 R's (R62) reviewed for elopement risk. Specifically, the facility allowed over-the-counter (OTC) flu and cold medications and shaving razors to be present and accessible in resident rooms without appropriate supervision or safety controls, and failed to adequately secure and monitor exit doors, allowing a resident to leave the building unsupervised. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury, medication misuse, adverse drug events, elopement, serious injury, or death.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled F 689 Accidents revised August 2022, revealed under Policy, Our facility strives to make the environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Administering Medications F 760, Administering Oral Medications, Medication Administration Schedule, and Insulin Administration, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of medications to four residents (R ) (R47, R113, R114, and R50) for four of 25 medication opportunities observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 16% (percent). This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact residents, leading to complications of current health status.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications F 760 revised [DATE] revealed under Guidelines, step 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. Step 7. The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policies titled, Storage of Medications F 761 and reference guide by Omnicare pharmacy titled, Guidance for Using Insulin Products, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored by failing to remove expired medications from one of three medication rooms, and failing to properly date and discard expired insulin pens in one of five medication carts. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents receiving ineffective or expired medications, placing them at increased risk for adverse health outcomes.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications F761, revised 10/2024, revealed under Guidelines step 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed per state regulation. Review of the facility's reference guide by Omnicare pharmacy titled, Guidance for Using Insulin Products dated 2025 revealed Upon opening, all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and family interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled Baseline Care Plans and Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to ensure that one R (R) (R7) out of eight reviewed for participation in care plan meetings, or R7's Power of Attorney (POA), were invited to participate in the care plan meetings to ensure that the care plan was individualized to meet R7's personal goals and preferences. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Baseline Care Plan, revised 6/2025, revealed the Guidelines section included . 6. Within 48 hours, the summary of the baseline care plan should be presented to the resident and/or their representative in writing, in a manner and language they understand. 7. Document evidence of the summary given to the resident or their representative in the medical record. Review of facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 3/2025, revealed the Guidelines section included 1. The facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA)/family of a change in condition of one resident (R) (R7) of eight residents reviewed for notification of change. Findings include:Review of the admission Record for R7 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma and end-stage renal disease. Further review of the admission Record revealed one person was listed as R7's POA and two people were listed as emergency contacts.Record review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment, dated 8/21/2024, revealed that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was assessed at eleven (indicating moderate cognitive impairment).Review of a Nursing Skilled Note, dated 6/26/2025, revealed R7 was observed vomiting {sic} coffee ground- like emesis, in house nurse practitioner notified and assessed resident. Recommended that the resident be sent out to the hospital for further management.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled Grievance/Complaint Log and Lost and Found, the facility failed to make a prompt effort to file a grievance for two of eight sampled residents (R) (R7 and R8) who verbally reported grievances. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of not having their grievances resolved in a timely manner. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Grievance/Complaint Log, with a review date of 10/2024, revealed Policy Statement: The disposition of all resident grievances and/or complaints will be recorded on our facility's Resident Grievance/Complaint Log. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The disposition of all written grievances and/or complaints must be recorded on the Resident Grievance/Complaint Log.Review of the policy titled Lost and Found, with a review date of 10/2024, revealed Policy Statement: Our facility shall assist all personnel and residents in safeguarding their personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Confidentiality and Privacy Information, the facility failed to ensure the privacy for one of 30 residents (R) (R98) was maintained by displaying a sign on the bedroom wall disclosing protected personal information. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Confidentiality and Privacy Information, effective date of 10/2023 under the Policy Statement revealed, Our facility shall treat all resident information confidentially. The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal medical record. Review of R98's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, for Section B (Hearing, Speech, Vision), indicated the resident's vision was highly impaired; Section C (Cognitive Patterns), a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated little to no cognitive impairment. Observation on 10/27/2024 at 5:24 pm in the room of R98 revealed, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, F 625 Bed Hold, the facility failed to ensure a bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one of two residents (R) (R27) reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled F 625 Bed Hold revised May 2023 revealed, 1. Upon admission and when a resident is transferred for a non-emergency hospitalization or for therapeutic leave, a representative of the business office will provide information concerning our bed-hold policy. 2. When emergency transfers are necessary, the facility will provide the resident and the resident representative with information concerning our bed-hold policy per state law as applicable. Review of R27 clinical records revealed, the resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to chronic kidney disease, acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, acute respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, the facility failed to develop a care plan specific to the recommendations per the physician's order related to the pain scale for one resident (R) (R23), failed to develop a care plan for dialysis for R64, and failed to to follow and update the care plan for refusals on restorative care for R19. The sample size was 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan dated August 2024 revealed, An individualized comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objective and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Further review of the policy revealed, (1) The facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative (sponsor), develops and maintains a comprehensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medication the facility failed to follow the physician's orders as recommended for one of 30 residents (R)(R23). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medication dated October 2024 documented Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. (3) Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including required time frame. R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that includes fracture of left lower leg sequela, and displaced trimalleolar fracture of unspecified lower leg, initial encounter for closed fracture. Review of the most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented R23 had a Brief Minimum Data Set (BIMS) score of 14 indicating little to no cognitive impairment. Further review revealed R23 had no behavior exhibited and requires a four-person mechanical lift, and assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Goals and Objectives, Restorative Services and Rehabilitative Nursing Care the facility failed to provide a right-hand grip splint for up to 4.5 hours for one of one Residents (R19) reviewed for rehab and restorative. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Goals and Objectives, Restorative Services last reviewed 10/2024 revealed the policy was specialized rehabilitative service goals and objectives shall be developed for problems identified through resident assessments. Under the Policy's Guidelines section revealed, Rehabilitative goals and objectives are developed for each resident and are outlined in his/her plan of care relative to therapy services. 2. (b) Assisting the resident in developing and strengthening his/her physiological and psychological resources. 2. (c) Encouraging the residents to maintain his/her independence and self-esteem. Review of the facility's policy titled Rehabilitative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to administer oxygen (O2) as ordered for one of two residents (R) (R9) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration with effective date of 4/2024 under the section titled, Purpose revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under the section Preparation revealed, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Under the section, Documentation revealed, After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record:1. The date and time that the procedure was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual who performed the procedure. 3. The rate of oxygen flow, route, and rationale. Review of R9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. During observation on 5/5/2024 at 1:15 pm in Room B-24 , it was revealed there was paint missing around the toilet paper holder in the bathroom. During observation on 5/5/2024 at 1:20 pm in Room B-30, the wall behind the bed had three holes in the sheet rock. 3. Observation on 5/05/2024 at 1:07 pm in Room A-19 revealed a bath basin and a urinal that were unlabeled and unbagged. There was a large amount of spider webs with leaves on the outside part of the window. The wall behind the B bed had a large number of dark scuff marks. The base board in the corner of the bathroom was found coming off the wall. The personal refrigerator in the room was dirty. Observation on 5/5/2024 at 1:22pm in Room A-20 revealed scuff marks on the inside of the bathroom door and on the wall in front of B bed. There was also a hole in the wall plaster behind the towel rack in the bathroom. Observation on 5/5/2024 at 1:26 pm in Room E-51 revealed there were three bath basins on the floor under the sink in the bathroom. They were not labeled and not in a bag. There was paint chipped off on the bathroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications F760, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (5%). Specifically, the facility failed to obtain physician orders to crush medications prior to administration for two of four residents (R) (R37 and R90). There were 29 opportunities observed resulting in two medication errors. The medication error rate was 6.9%. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications F760, last revised 10/2023 under the section titled, Guidelines revealed, 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. 1. Review of R37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, Section C (Cognitive Pattern), a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment; Section I (Active Diagnoses) revealed, acute kidney failure, altered mental status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheters F690 and Handwashing/Hand Hygiene F 880, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices for one of four residents (R) (R15) during catheter care observation. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during meal tray distribution. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 115 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Indwelling Urinary Catheters F690 with a revision date of 6/2022 revealed under Infection Control, 1. Use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage system. 2. Maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. Review of the facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene F 880 with a revision date of 10/2022 revealed under Guidelines, 5. Employees must wash their hands for at least twenty (20)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Program, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASARR was conducted for one of five sampled residents (R) (R40) reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Program dated 9/2023 under the Policy Statement revealed, This community will coordinate assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program. Under Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 1. Upon admission, the Social Worker or designee will, within the context of the established assessment process, the recommendations of the PASARR level II and the PASARR evaluation report with be incorporated into the resident's assessment, care planning and transition of care . 8. The Interdisciplinary Assessment Team must use the MDS from currently mandated by Federal and State regulations to conduct the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled, F656, F657, F658 Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of six residents (R) (R58). This failure had the potential for R58 to not receive treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, F656, F657, F658 Comprehensive Care Plans, last approved 9/2023, revealed the Policy stated, An individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, cultural, and psychological needs is developed for each resident. The section titled Guidelines stated, 8. Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas, b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems, c. Build on the resident's strengths, d. Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled, Quality of Life-Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the facility failed to provide ADL care for three of seven residents (R) (R23, R87, and R70). Specifically, the facility failed to provide nailcare for R23 and R87 and failed to provide showers as scheduled for R70. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Quality of Life-Activities of Daily Living with a last revised date of November 2017 revealed under Policy Statement Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R23 revealed that he was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, unspecified symbolic dysfunctions, psychosis, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policies titled, Range of Motion Exercises and Goals and Objectives, Restorative Services, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of nine Residents (R) (R22) receiving restorative care. This deficient practice had the probability to cause a further decline in range of motion for R22. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Range of Motion Exercises last revision date 11/2016, revealed, Residents with limited range of motion will receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion. Review of the policy titled, Goals and Objectives, Restorative Services last approved date 9/2023, revealed under Policy interpretation and implementation, Rehabilitative goals and objectives are developed for each resident and are outlined in his/her plan of care relative to therapy services. Review of the medical record for R22 revealed the Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility policies titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing F689 and Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent falls for one of six residents (R) (R58) and failed to ensure an oxygen cylinder was stored and secured for one of 15 residents receiving oxygen (R15). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing F689, last approved 4/2024, revealed the Policy stated, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, last approved 4/2023, revealed the section titled Equipment and Supplies documented 1. Portable oxygen cylinders should be strapped to the stand. 1. A review of R58s' Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly check for Gastric tube (G-tube) (tube in the stomach for nutrition) placement for one of four Residents (R) (R33) receiving nutrition through a G-tube. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R33, revealed that he was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to end stage renal disease, adult failure to thrive, and aphasia following other cerebrovascular disease. Review of the care plan for R33 dated [DATE] revealed that he requires tube feeding and is at risk for fluid balance fluctuation, alteration in nutrition and weight loss, and has a swallowing problem. An intervention that is in place for this problem is to check for tube placement and gastric contents/residual volume per facility protocol and record. Review of the Physician Orders dated [DATE] for R33 revealed that the resident was to have continuous feeding of Nepro at 78 milliliters (ml)/ hour via the G-tube: at 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen, Administration, the facility failed to obtain an order for oxygen therapy for one of 15 residents (R) (R32). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated April 2023 under the section titled, Purpose revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under section titled, Preparation revealed, 1. Verify that there is a physician order for this procedure. Review the physician orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of the clinical record revealed R32 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, acute respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia. Review of R32's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that privacy curtains provided full visual privacy for three (3) of 63 shared resident bedrooms: (B39, E 44, D5). Findings Include: Observation on 5/5/2024 at 2:15 pm revealed that room E44 privacy curtain was missing several hooks causing the curtain to hang leaving a large gap in the curtain, and not providing full privacy for the resident in the B bed. Observation on 5/6/2024 at 9:58 pm revealed room D5 privacy curtain had missing hooks and was unable to be drawn for full privacy while providing care for the resident. Observation on 5/6/2024 at 8:46 am revealed that there were hooks noted on the curtain track, but no privacy curtain observed for room B39-1 to provide privacy for the resident during care. Interview on 5/8/2024 at 2:19 pm with LPN DD revealed they do not keep maintenance work order books at any of the nursing stations. She stated there is a more manageable tracking system for the nursing staff to use electronically. Interview walking rounds on 5/8/2024 at 9:15 am with the Maintenance Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure trash was contained in dumpsters with closed lids for four of four outside trash dumpsters. Findings include: Upon arrival to the facility on 8/14/2023 at 9:00 a.m., two surveyors observed that the facilities four outside trash dumpsters were not covered by lids. Trash was observed in the dumpsters and on the ground around the four dumpsters. During the initial kitchen tour on 8/14/2023 at 9:53 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager, an inspection of the four outside trash dumpsters was conducted. All four of the trash dumpsters were observed to have the lids open, with trash in the dumpsters, and on the ground outside of the dumpsters. The Dietary Manager confirmed the observations and promptly closed the lids. The facility did not have a policy related to the maintenance of the trash dumpsters.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to provide safe oxygen (O2) administration for three of four residents (R) (R#11, R#14, and R#21) receiving O2 therapy from a total sample of 27 residents. The deficient practice had the potential of the residents receiving inadequate O2 therapy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, with a review date of April 2023, reads in part The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Date the pieces of equipment as appropriate. Place the call light within easy reach of the resident . 1. Review of R#11's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) section titled admission Records, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R#11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 3/20/2023 located in the EMR section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's policy Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions (aka Isolation), the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when one staff member failed to follow contact precautions for one of one Resident (R) (R#42) reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP) out of a total sample of 27 residents. The deficient practice had the potential of exposing residents to infections due to cross contamination. Findings include: Review of facility's policy Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions (aka Isolation), revised on March 2023 stated, (d) 1. In addition to wearing a gown [as outlined under Standard 2 Precautions], wear a gown (clean, nonsterile) for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or potentially contaminated items in the resident's environment. Review of the CDC's Prevent the spread of Clostridioides difficile (C. diff), updated on 7/20/2021, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cdiff/prevent.html on 8/20/2023 stated, While caring for you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by another resident by failing to report an allegation of verbal and physical abuse to the State agency between two of 27 sampled Residents (R) (R#11 and R#161) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of R#11's Face Sheet, located in the resident's electronic medical records (EMR) section titled admission Record, revealed R#11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic renal disease with dialysis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, acute respiratory failure, and acute pulmonary edema. Review of R#11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/26/2023 located in the EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R#11 was cognitively intact and able to make her own decisions. The MDS documented R#11 did not exhibit any behavior during the assessment period. 2. Review of R#161's Face Sheet, located in the EMR section titled admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one of 27 sampled residents (R) (R#42). This failure had the potential to affect the quality-of-care for R#42. Findings include: Review of R#42's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) section titled admission Record, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, kidney disease stage four, sepsis Escherichia coli, adult failure to thrive, sepsis shock, and dorsalgia (back pain). Review of R#42's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/28/2023 located in the EMR section titled MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R#42's cognition was intact. A significant change MDS was completed since the resident had developed several pressure ulcers (stages II, III, and IV) and loss of appetite. A review of the assessment of Behaviors revealed no documented behaviors during the assessment period…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for resisting care and wound care for one of 27 sampled residents (R) (R#42). Findings include: Review of the provider's, titled Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised August 2022 revealed: An individualized comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, mental, cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident. 7. The care plan should describe the resident's nursing, medical, physical, mental and psychosocial preferences. They should include person specific, measurable objectives and time frames with a goal to measure their progress towards meeting such. 8. Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas; b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; c. Build of resident's strengths; d. Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents (R) (R#21) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) received incontinent care. Sample size was 27 residents. The deficient practice had the potential for R#42 to develop pressure sores, and/or worsen ongoing pressure sores. Findings include: Review of R#21's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) section titled admission Records, revealed R#21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, and cerebral infarct (stroke). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/29/2023 located in the EMR section titled MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R#21's cognition was intact. R#21 was totally dependent on staff for all areas of ADLs with two plus persons for physical assistance. R#21 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of R#21's care plan with revision date of 8/04/2023 and located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Accidents-Elopement, the facility failed to prevent elopement out of the building and into the parking lot of one of one resident (R) (R#311) reviewed for elopement out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents-Elopement, dated August 2023, revealed Staff shall evaluate, investigate and report all cases of missing residents. Definitions-Wandering: Random or repetitive locomotion, which may be goal directed (e.g., the resident is searching for something) or non-goal oriented or aimless. Elopement: A situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge or supervision if necessary and this situation represents a risk to the resident's health and safety and places the resident at risk of heat or cold exposure, dehydration and/or other medical complications, drowning or being struck by a motor vehicle. Review of R#311's undated admission Record, located in R#311's electronic medical record (EMR),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Dialysis, Care for a Resident, the facility failed to be in communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one of 27 sampled residents (R) (R#211). Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Dialysis, Care for a Resident, revised May 2021, revealed Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [kidney failure requiring dialysis] will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. 1. The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition on a daily basis . 2. Signs and symptoms of worsening condition and/or complications of ESRD . Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed . 1. How information will be exchanged between the facility. Review of R#211's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R#211 was admitted to the facility with medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Drug Use, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored for side effects and/or behaviors while administering antipsychotic medication for two of five residents (R) (R#4 and R#46) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Drug Use, dated January 2023, revealed through the on-going assessment process, monitoring should include a. potential side effects such as sedation, lethargy, agitation, mental status changes, or behavioral changes . 1. Review of R#4's undated admission Record, located in R#4's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated R#4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of R#4's Physician Orders, dated 6/01/2023, located in the EMR under the Orders tab, revealed an order for Seroquel 50 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled, Administering Medication, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent. During medication administration five medication errors for resident (R) (R#71) were made from 30 opportunities. The medication error rate was 16.66 percent. Finding include: Review of a facility policy titled Administering Medication, with a review date May 2022, reads in part .Medications may not be prepared in advance and must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders . Observation on 08/17/2023 at 10:48 a.m. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 setting up the following nine medications for R#71: Zyprexa (antipsychotic)10 milligram (mg) one tablet Seroquel (antipsychotic)100 mg one tablet valproic acid (anticonvulsant) 20 cubic centimeters (cc) ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) (iron supplement) 325 mg one tablet metoprolol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST), Guidance for Completing the POLST Form, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete for two of seven residents (R) (R#7 and R#39) related to POLST forms not signed by the resident/resident representative and/or the physician resulting in the POLST forms not being completed. Findings include: Review of the Guidance for Completing the POLST Form stated .5. If a patient lacks decision making capacity, The POLST form may be signed by an authorized person, which includes, the following order priority: a. the agent name on the patients durable power of attorney for health care or health care agent name on the patients advance directive for health care, b. a spouse c. a court-appointed guardian d. son or daughter (age 18 or older) e. parent f. brother or sister (age 18 or older). The POLST does not list facility staff as an authorized person to sign. Record review revealed R#7's POLST form, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Inspection of Heat/Air-conditioning Systems, the facility failed to ensure that heat/air-conditioning systems located on one of four nursing units were in good repair. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the safety, functional, and sanitary conditions for residents on a secured unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Inspection of Heat/Air-conditioning Systems, dated May 2022, revealed The facility's heating and air-conditioning system shall be inspected at lease[sic] semi-annually. 1. Prior to the beginning of each heating/cooling season our facility's heating and air-conditioning systems shall be inspected for possible gas leaks, lines that have bust, etc. 2. The Maintenance Department shall be responsible for such inspections and shall have the authority to use local gas and/or approved repairmen to assist in making inspections when assistance is necessary. During the initial tour conducted on 8/14/2023 at 11:45 a.m., observations were conducted of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Calhoun Crossing Of Journey LLCCalhoun, GA 1 of 5Clifton HeightsLouisville, KY 1 of 5Crossroads of Flowery Branch of Journey LLC, TheFlowery Branch, GA 1 of 5Fairburn Heights Of Journey LLCFairburn, GA 1 of 5Jasper Point Of Journey LLCJasper, GA 1 of 5Jesup Ridge of Journey LLCJesup, GA 1 of 5Kirtland Woods Of JourneyKirtland, OH 1 of 5Morgantown Heights Of JourneyMorgantown, WV 1 of 5Murray Woods Of Journey LLCChatsworth, GA 1 of 5Reserve at Appling of Journey LLC, TheAppling, GA 1 of 5Stanford CrossingStanford, KY 1 of 5Stone Mountain Run Of Journey LLCStone Mountain, GA 1 of 5Thomasville Vistas of Journey LLCThomasville, GA 2 of 5Crossings At East Lake Of Journey Llc, TheDecatur, GA 2 of 5Fort Valley Crossing of Journey LLCFort Valley, GA 2 of 5Frankfort TrailsFrankfort, KY 2 of 5Glasgow Hills Of JourneyGlasgow, WV 2 of 5Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, TheFort Gaines, GA 2 of 5Warrenton Woods of Journey LLCWarrenton, GA 2 of 5Woods at Lumber City of Journey LLC, TheLumber City, GA 3 of 5Bainbridge Landing of Journey LLCBainbridge, GA 3 of 5Cartersville Crossing Of Journey LLCCartersville, GA 3 of 5Chardon WoodsChardon, OH 3 of 5Dublin Trails Of Journey LLCDublin, GA 3 of 5LaGrange Trails of Journey LLCLagrange, GA 3 of 5Riverside Valley Of JourneySaint Albans, WV 3 of 5Twin City Trails of Journey LLCTwin City, GA 3 of 5Vanceburg HillsVanceburg, KY 4 of 5Green River TrailsGreensburg, KY 4 of 5Roberta Trails of Journey LLCRoberta, GANot rated (Special Focus)Lyndon Crossing, LLCLouisville, KY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GBD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL5%since 01/01/2015
MEADOWBROOK OPERATOR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 05/01/2008
CRINO, BRYANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 01/01/2015
FEUER, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST32%since 01/01/2015
PASSERO, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/01/2015
BARRES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/01/2015
T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/01/2015
WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/01/2015
LINDEMAN, STUARTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER5%since 01/01/2015
BARNES, MICHELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2018
YOAKUM, JAMIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/19/2024
MISSION HEALTH OF GEORGIA, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-34.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$525K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 7%Other / private 15%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $525K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,501per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$257per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115561. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next