No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stanford Crossing

105 Harmon Heights, Stanford, KY 40484 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 128 certified beds · (606) 365-2141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)8 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$26,685 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • inspectors cited 8 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-08)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
126 Portman Ave · (606) 365-9181 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
105 W Main St · (606) 365-2164 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
606 Lancaster St · (606) 365-2716 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Highway 27 · (859) 339-5893 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.8%13.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%6.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.5%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.7%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.8%29.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%19.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%16.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%83.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%24.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.9%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.191.941.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.222.141.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.9%CMS range 32.5–54.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.9–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting64.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.0–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
53.0%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 117.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-08)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician and the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status for one (1) of 51 total sampled residents, Resident (R) 19. The facility assessed R19 to have decreased meal and fluid intake on [DATE] through [DATE]. Per interview, R19 also had a change in level of consciousness on [DATE] and [DATE]. However, there was no documented evidence the staff notified the resident's physician or representative from [DATE] through [DATE] of the resident's changes. R19 expired on [DATE]. The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure each resident's physician and resident's representative were notified of significant changes in the resident's physical and mental status is likely to cause harm, impairment, or death to a resident. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] and was determined to exist on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan and failed to implement care plan interventions. Additionally, the facility failed to identify, assess, and intervene for an acute change in the resident's condition related to decreased appetite and level of consciousness for one (1) of 51 sampled residents, Resident (R) 19. The facility assessed R19 to have decreased meal and fluid intake on 11/24/2025 through 11/27/2025. Per interview, R19 also had a change in level of consciousness on 11/26/2025 and 11/27/2025. However, there was no evidence the staff completed a thorough nursing assessment from 11/24/2025 through 11/27/2025. The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident #7). The facility assessed Resident #7 to be a risk for elopement and care planned him/her for the risk with interventions which included: to distract from wandering by being offered pleasant diversions which included: structured activities, food, conversation, television, or a book. On 05/16/2023, the resident was observed to push on the exit door handle and press the door code box to exit the facility. The resident was provided a Wandergaurd at that time; however, the resident's person-centered care plan failed to address the resident pressing the code box and/or provide increased supervision or monitoring for the safety of the resident. Therefore, on 07/15/2023 at 6:40 PM, Resident #7 was able to exit the facility undetected by staff, by entering the code observed by a staff member who entered the code for the resident's viewing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility documents and policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide effective monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents assessed as an elopement risk (Resident #7). The facility assessed Resident #7 as at risk for elopement and care planned the resident to be distracted from wandering by being offered pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, or a book. However, the resident was able to exit the facility undetected by staff on 07/15/2023 at 6:40 PM, based on a review of the facility's Final Investigation Report. The resident was found located outside the building unsupervised for approximately five (5) minutes. The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Removal Plan on 08/31/2023, alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/22/2023, prior to the State Survey Agency's (SSA's) investigation. The SSA validated the facility's IJ Removal Plan, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for six (6) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents (Residents #1, #16, #17, #18, #19 and #88). 1. Review of Resident #1's CCP revealed the facility assessed Resident #1 as a fall risk, on 05/29/2018, with a history of impaired cognition and restless/anxious behaviors, balance problems of which resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. On 01/01/2020, the resident was ordered a low air loss (LAL) mattress (alternating pressure system) developed for the comfort of the resident and related to risk for pressure ulcers; however, the resident was not care planned for the air mattress. Resident #1's care plan provided no evidence of ordered guidelines to ensure appropriate settings that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents or hazards. In addition, the facility failed to conduct a thorough fall investigation that led to a root cause determination; along with the development and implementation of an action plan after each fall for five (5) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents (Residents #1, #16, #17, #18 and #19). 1. On [DATE], Resident #1 was ordered an air mattress (alternating pressure system) for his/her comfort, without assessing the resident's needs and safety for the device. Review of the manufacture's recommendation for the air mattress revealed that to avoid the risk of death or injury from falling, staff were to read the user manual prior to its use. Continued review of the manufacture's recommendation revealed it was the requirement that the residents would be assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the facility's Administrator's Job Description, it was determined the facility failed to be administered in a manner which enabled its effective use of its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility was cited at the S/S of Immediate Jeopardy during the 06/10/2023 survey. Review of the 02/10/2020 Recertification Survey's Plan of Correction (POC), and the Abbreviated Survey's POC revealed the facility was previously cited at actual harm and Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The 06/10/2023 survey had repeat deficiencies that had been cited on the 02/10/2020 survey. Review of the fall tracker revealed the facility had a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls within a four (4) month time period. Of the 108 falls, thirty-three (33) falls resulted in injuries. The facility's Administrator failed to have an effective system in place to investigate the root cause of the residents' falls; failed to develop and implement an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-10 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its Governing Body was actively engaged in ensuring its policies were effectively implemented regarding the management and operation of the facility. The facility's Governing Body failed to ensure the facility sustained substantial compliance in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, F656; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices, F689; 42 CFR 483.70 Administration, (F835); 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), F865; 42 CFR 483.70 Governing Body, F837; and 42 CFR 483.70 Medical Director, F841. In addition,, review of the facility's fall tracker documentation revealed the facility noted a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls occurred within a four (4) month time period. Of the one-hundred and eight (108) falls, thirty-three (33) of the falls resulted in injuries to the resident. (Refer to F656, F689, F835, and F867) The facility's failure to have an effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-10 · tag F0841 — pattern
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to investigate the root cause of the resident's falls. The Medical Director was responsible for providing the staff direction related to the facility's policy and the current professional standard of practice and failed to ensure the coordination of medical care in the facility. As a result, five (5) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents experienced falls with major injuries. The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure the Medical Director provided oversight of the residents medical care and failure to implement polices that was reflective of the current professional standards of practice has caused or is likely to cause serious harm or serious injury to the residents. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] and was determined to exist on [DATE] in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F656), Develop/Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, documents, Executive Director's Job Description, and Plan of Correction (PoC) submitted for the 03/05/2020 Recertification Survey, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective process in place to address systemic failures through regularly scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. As a result, the facility failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. The facility failed to develop and implement plans of action to correct identified quality of care deficiencies; and failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. The facility failed to effectively track adverse resident events, analyze their causes, and implement effective preventive action. The facility failed to ensure there was an effective system in place to regularly review and analyze audit data, including data collected under the QAPI program, and act on available data to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one (1) of 51 total sampled residents, Resident (R) 19. The facility failed to document assessments for R19 from 11/24/2025 to 11/27/2025 when R19 had a decline in intake and level of consciousness. R19 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. R19 expired on 12/04/2025.The findings include:The facility did not provide a policy for nursing documentation. Review of the facility's position description, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated 02/2025, revealed the LPN's essential functions included observing, recording, and reporting changes in residents' condition to the supervisor and attending physician and maintaining residents' medical record by way of documentation. Review of the facility's position description, RN (Registered Nurse), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:11Number of residents cited: 7 Based on observations, interviews, record review, review of facility staffing documentation, and review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, the facility failed to ensure it had an effective system to provide sufficient numbers of qualified nursing staff to meet the needs of 6 of 51 sampled residents (Resident (R) 8, 18, 30, 68, 94 and 117). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Staffing, implemented 03/20/2025, revealed the purpose was to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Further review of the facility's staffing policy revealed the facility must ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for eight of 51 sampled residents (R) Residents ((R) 6, R7, R64, R37, R58, R70, R72, and R92). The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Rights, revealed the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Review of the facility's housekeeping policy titled, Housekeeping Daily Duties, dated 12/2001, revealed a schedule of what housekeeping would do on each day of the week. The policy stated All corners and along all baseboards must be dust mopped to prevent buildup. When water pushes dust into corners, problems occur.1. On 12/04/2025 at 9:18 AM, observation of R6's room revealed a tile in the doorway that was cracked and potentially a fall hazard. Continued observation revealed that a handrail in the bathroom next to the toilet was loose and missing one of four screws. 2. On 12/04/2025 at 9:26 AM, observation of R7's room revealed five cracked tiles in the doorway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented for two of 51 sampled residents (Resident (R5 and R90). The findings include: 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 04/06/2015 and revised 02/09/2024, revealed the facility would develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Closed record review of R5's face sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/22/2024. R5's readmission on [DATE] included diagnoses that included subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing; personal history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA/stroke); and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, and difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four (4) of 51 sampled residents (Resident (R)7, R28, R42 and R50).The findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), dated 03/08/2024, revealed the EBP policy was implemented to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) within the facility. The policy stated EBP would be utilized in conjunction with standard precautions to provide targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. The policy stated high contact care activities included assisting with and providing hands on care.Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control dated 03/10/2024, revealed that all nebulizer tubing should be in a sealed bag when not in use. The policy stated that it was okay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide safe medication administration for one of 12 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Resident Rights revealed the resident had the right to be free from any medication errors and to receive the correct medication. Review of the undated facility policy Medication Administration revealed that the resident had the right to receive the correct medication at the correct time, and the correct dose. Review of the facilities investigative report revealed that Resident (R) 3 and R12 were housed in a room together and on 02/24/2025 they decided that they wanted to switch A bed and B bed positions. The facility switched the two bed positions and did not update the residents bed transfer in the computer system until the next day. On 02/24/2025 at medication pass Registered Nurse (RN)1 gave R3 medications that were supposed to be given to R12 due to failure to properly identify the correct resident. R3 received the following medications that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its pharmaceutical services, to include procedures which assured the accurate acquiring and receiving of all controlled drugs, implemented its policy to prevent diversion for one (1) of thirty-five (35) sampled residents (Resident #49). Resident #49 was found to have missing controlled substance medications which could not be accounted for, and the facility was unable to locate them. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances, dated 06/21/2017, revealed the facility was to maintain a record and signed scheduled medication count at each change of shift (the Shift Count) by the on-coming nurse or authorized individual with off-going nurse or authorized individual, using a Controlled Drug Count Verification Form or using a facility approved form. Continued policy review revealed any discrepancies in the Shift Count must be immediately reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) for further action. Review of the facility's Final…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and medical records for the residents on the 100 Hall. On 05/31/2023, observations during the initial facility rounds, revealed on three (3) occasions, the screen of the computer was sitting on top of the 100 Hall medication cart. The computer had been left open with the resident's information visible to anyone passing by the cart. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights-Kentucky, effective date 01/09/2020, under the section,State Resident Rights, item number seven (7) revealed all residents shall have confidential treatment of their medical and personal records. Observations, on 05/31/2023 at 8:17 AM, 8:53 AM and 9:17 AM, revealed the medication cart, for the residents on the 100 Hall, was stationed across the hall from rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Further observations revealed the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and under proper temperature control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all medications and/or biological supplies stored on the 200 Hallway medication storage room had not expired. On 05/31/2023, 06/01/2023, and again on 06/09/2023, three (3) licensed nurses assigned to medication (med) carts on the 100 and 200 hallways failed to lock their med carts when away from the carts. On 06/07/2023, the thermometer in the medication refrigerator on the 300 Hallway, registered 64 degrees Fahrenheit.(F). However, according to the log posted on the refrigerator door, the refrigerator temperature should be below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Further review of the log posted on the refrigerator indicated temperatures had not been measured and documented twice daily in the month of June 2023. Observation, on 06/09/2023 of the 200 Hallway medication storage room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-09 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for bed rail use for three (3) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents, Resident #40, #49, and #50 prior to utilizing the bed rails. Observations of Resident #40, Resident #49, and Resident #50 on 07/07/2021, 07/08/2021, and 07/09/2021 revealed bed rails were in use on the beds. Record review revealed no evidence that informed consent was provided prior to the use of bed rails. The findings include: Review of the Bed Rail Use Policy dated March 13, 2018 revealed a licensed nurse would complete the bed rail assessment and consent upon admission, readmission, and quarterly. Further review of the policy revealed appropriate alternatives must be attempted and include documentation of how these alternatives failed to meet the resident need prior to installing bed rails. 1. Observation of Resident #49 on 07/07/2021 at 10:05 AM revealed half bed rails were on the resident's bed and were elevated. Observation of incontinence care on 07/08/2021 at 4:51 PM revealed two (2) staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident reported grievance was investigated per the facility's grievance policy/process for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents (Resident #75). The findings include: Review of facility policy titled Grievance/Concern Process dated 04/14/2020, revealed the purpose of policy was to establish a process for responding to a resident or resident representative's grievance. Per the policy, upon identification of a resident or resident representative concern, complete the grievance/concern form identifying the issue and forward the form to the Grievance Officer. Further review revealed the Grievance Officer then forwards the grievance/concern form to the appropriate department head for investigation. Once resolved, the grievance/concern form is updated with the resolution of the concern and returned to the Grievance Officer. Per the policy, the Grievance Officer or designee may complete a follow up call or meeting with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Drug Regimen Review recommendations and physician orders, were acted upon for one (1) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents (Resident #98). The findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review: Facility Process dated 11/21/2017, revealed the process was in place to prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible by providing oversight by a licensed pharmacist, attending physician, medical director, and the Director of Nursing. It further stated Medication Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risk associated with medications. The policy also stated Nursing will process any new orders as received from the physician. Review of Resident #98's facility record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/14/2015…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $13,342 — penalty dated 2025-12-08
  • $13,343 — penalty dated 2025-12-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Calhoun Crossing Of Journey LLCCalhoun, GA 1 of 5Clifton HeightsLouisville, KY 1 of 5Crossroads of Flowery Branch of Journey LLC, TheFlowery Branch, GA 1 of 5Fairburn Heights Of Journey LLCFairburn, GA 1 of 5Jasper Point Of Journey LLCJasper, GA 1 of 5Jesup Ridge of Journey LLCJesup, GA 1 of 5Kirtland Woods Of JourneyKirtland, OH 1 of 5Morgantown Heights Of JourneyMorgantown, WV 1 of 5Murray Woods Of Journey LLCChatsworth, GA 1 of 5Reserve at Appling of Journey LLC, TheAppling, GA 1 of 5Stone Mountain Run Of Journey LLCStone Mountain, GA 1 of 5Thomasville Vistas of Journey LLCThomasville, GA 1 of 5Tucker Park Crossing of Journey LLCTucker, GA 2 of 5Crossings At East Lake Of Journey Llc, TheDecatur, GA 2 of 5Fort Valley Crossing of Journey LLCFort Valley, GA 2 of 5Frankfort TrailsFrankfort, KY 2 of 5Glasgow Hills Of JourneyGlasgow, WV 2 of 5Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, TheFort Gaines, GA 2 of 5Warrenton Woods of Journey LLCWarrenton, GA 2 of 5Woods at Lumber City of Journey LLC, TheLumber City, GA 3 of 5Bainbridge Landing of Journey LLCBainbridge, GA 3 of 5Cartersville Crossing Of Journey LLCCartersville, GA 3 of 5Chardon WoodsChardon, OH 3 of 5Dublin Trails Of Journey LLCDublin, GA 3 of 5LaGrange Trails of Journey LLCLagrange, GA 3 of 5Riverside Valley Of JourneySaint Albans, WV 3 of 5Twin City Trails of Journey LLCTwin City, GA 3 of 5Vanceburg HillsVanceburg, KY 4 of 5Green River TrailsGreensburg, KY 4 of 5Roberta Trails of Journey LLCRoberta, GANot rated (Special Focus)Lyndon Crossing, LLCLouisville, KY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JOURNEY CZ OF KY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2024
JOURNEY CZ KY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2024
MCGUINNESS, BERNARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2024
WOODS, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2026
3 BEES HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
AJOJ HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
BEES FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
BLUE OCEAN TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
JOURNEY CZ MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
SHASAM FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
SHASAM HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024
DOODNAUTH, DAVANANDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 6%Other / private 12%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$337per resident / day
operating cost
$10,246per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185244. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next