No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

LaGrange Trails of Journey LLC

2111 West Point Road, Lagrange, GA 30240 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (706) 812-9293 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (706) 812-9293 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1955 Roanoke Rd · (706) 443-5273 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1861 Roanoke Rd Ste A · (706) 350-4200 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1861 Roanoke Rd # 1 · (706) 845-9102 · Call to confirm hours
Park
801 Dallis St · (706) 883-1689 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.3%15.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%5.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%11.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.4%20.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.2%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.7%15.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%2.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine34.7%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%25.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.4%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.932.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days6.831.901.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.0%CMS range 26.2–55.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.3–18.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.9–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
53.2%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 107.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Glucometer Disinfection, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate disinfection procedures for blood glucose monitoring devices. Specifically, staff failed to properly disinfect the glucometer between resident use during blood glucose monitoring observations for three of three sampled Residents (R) (R4, R2 and R3). This deficient practice placed residents at increased risk for infection transmission and cross-contamination. Findings Include:Observation on 05/12/2026 at 10:08 AM on Hall 300 (East Wing) with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA revealed R4 received a blood glucose check using a shared glucometer. Following use, the nurse cleaned only the strip insertion area of the glucometer with an alcohol swab rather than disinfecting the entire device according to facility policy.Observation on 05/12/2026 at 10:39 AM on Hall 300 (East Wing) with LPN AA revealed R2 received a blood glucose check using the same shared glucometer. Following use, the nurse cleaned only the strip insertion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Medication Administration, Insulin Pen, and the package insert TRESIBA (insulin degludec) injection, for subcutaneous use, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administration of medications for four of 40 medication opportunities observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 10 percent for two residents(R) (R4 and R3) during medication administration. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact residents' clinical conditions and lead to complications in their current health statusFindings include:Observation on 05/12/2026 at 10:08 AM on Hall 300 (East Wing) with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA revealed R4 had a physician order for Calcium 600 (calcium carbonate), give 600 milligrams(mg) one time a day. During medication administration, the nurse administered Calcium 600 + D 10 micrograms(mcg), which did not match the physician's order. Observation on 05/12/2026 at 11:02 AM on Hall 300 (East Wing) with LPN AA revealed R3 had physician orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained for two of six residents (R) (R94 and R54) with an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice had the potential to place R94 and R54 at risk of a diminished quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, reviewed/revised 12/2/2024, revealed the Policy section stated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. The Policy Explanation section included, . 2. Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use. 3. Privacy bags will be changed out when soiled, with a catheter change or as needed. 1. Review of R94's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Routine Bathroom Cleaning, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner in three of seven resident restrooms. This deficient practice placed the residents residing in the rooms at risk of living in an unsanitary environment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Routine Bathroom Cleaning, reviewed/revised 6/25/2024, revealed the Policy stated, It is the policy of this facility to establish policies, procedures, and guidelines to provide a clean and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and visitors in order to prevent cross contamination and transmission of healthcare associated infection (HAI). The Procedure section included, 1. a. Remove soiled linen from the floor, wipe up any spills, and remove waste. c. Clean wall attachments. g. Clean support railings, ledges, and shelves. i. Clean entire toilet including handle and underside of flush rim. Apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice, the facility failed to provide bed hold information, in writing, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for one of 43 sampled residents (R) (R82). This failure had the potential to contribute to possible denial of re-admission and loss of the residents' home following a hospitalization for residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice, dated February 5, 2025, revealed the Policy section stated, It is the policy of this facility to provide a written information to the resident and /or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included, 1. As part of the admission packet and at the time of a transfer to the hospital or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide the resident and/or resident representative written information that specifies : A. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Appropriate Use of Indwelling Catheters, the facility failed to transcribe a physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of six residents (R) (R94) with an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Appropriate Use of Indwelling Catheters, dated 12/2/2024, revealed the Policy section included, . An indwelling urinary catheter will be utilized only when a resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary. The Policy explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included, . 4. The use of an indwelling urinary catheter will be in accordance with physician orders, which will include diagnosis or clinical condition making the use of the catheter necessary, size of the catheter, and frequency of change (if applicable). Review of R94's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) therapy was administered according to the physician's order and respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner for one of 23 residents (R) (R6) receiving O2 therapy. The deficient practices had the potential to place R6 at risk of respiratory distress and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised 4/9/2025, revealed the Policy explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included, 1. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. 5. d. If applicable change nebulizer tubing and delivery devices every 72 hours or per facility policy and as needed if they become soiled or contaminated. e. Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Review of R6's admission Record revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered medications were obtained from the pharmacy to be administered at the designated time for three of 43 sampled residents (R) (R93, R64, and R24). This deficient practice had the potential to place R93, R64, and R24 at risk of unmet needs and medical complications. Findings Include: 1. Review of R93's admission Record revealed R93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, essential hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of R93's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 5/6/2025 for amlodipine besylate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure, chronic stable chest pain, and coronary artery disease) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg), give one by mouth one time a day for blood pressure, hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110. Further review revealed an order dated 5/6/2025 for atorvastatin calcium oral tablet 40 mg, give one by mouth one time a day for cholesterol.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were three errors of 30 opportunities for two of six residents (R) (R93 and R24) observed for a medication error rate of 10 percent. This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication not being given in accordance with the physician's orders and the potential to adversely affect R93 and R24's clinical conditions. Findings include: 1. Review of R93's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 5/6/2025 for amlodipine besylate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure, chronic stable chest pain, and coronary artery disease) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg), give one by mouth one time a day for blood pressure, hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110. Further review revealed an order dated 5/6/2025 for atorvastatin calcium oral tablet 40 mg (a medication used to lower cholesterol), give one by mouth one time a day for cholesterol. Review of R93's medication administration record (MAR), dated 5/2025, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to ensure that behavior monitoring was documented for one of four residents (R) (R17). The deficient practice had the potential to inhibit nursing staff from monitoring side affects and or adverse reactions for R17 while consuming antipsychotic medications and reporting the findings to the physician. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, with revised date of December 2016 revealed under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 16. The staff will observe, document and report to the Attending Physician information regarding the effectiveness of any intervention, including antipsychotic medication. 17. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report any of the following side effects and adverse consequences of antipsychotic Medication to the attending physician. Record review for R17 revealed resident was admitted to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 8 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level and Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedures, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed during Glucose finger stick monitoring for three of five Residents (R) (R57, R49, and R12). The deficient practice had the potential to increase the probability of the spread of infection between residents R57, R49, and R12 while monitoring their blood glucose levels. Findings include. Review of the facility policy titled, Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level, Revised October 2010, under Steps in the Procedure: 1. Place the equipment on the bedside stand or table. Arrange the supplies so they can be easily reached. 4. Wear clean gloves. 17. Clean and disinfect reusable equipment between uses according to the manufacturer's instructions and current infection control standards of practice. 18. Remove gloves and discard into designated container. 19. Wash hands. Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of Storage of Medications Policy the facility failed to ensure that the medication storage room was locked for one of two storage rooms. Findings include: Observation on 1/4/2023 at 9:05 a.m. revealed the East Wing nurses' station was not attended. It was observed that the medication storage room was unlocked and the refrigerator containing medication was also unlocked. Further observation on 1/5/2023 at 9:00 a.m. revealed the medication storage room on the East Wing was still unlocked. However, the refrigerator containing medication was locked at this time. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA, on 1/5/2023 at 9:05 a.m. revealed that the door is supposed to be locked. She stated, oh well, and then locked it. Interview on 1/5/2023 11:45 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) CC revealed the storge room door is propped open, only while she was at the nurse's station. When the nurse's station is unattended the door is to be closed and locked. Review of the policy titled Storage of Medications, that was revised in November 2020,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the policy, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Infection Prevention and Control Measure, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control practices were maintained for two residents (R) (#58 and #179) with the diagnosis of COVID-19; there was no supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) outside or immediately within the room for staff, inconsistent use of respirator masks and gloves and no observation of the use of gowns. The census was 83. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Infection Prevention and Control Measures (review date unknown) documented the facility follows infection prevention and control (IPC) practices recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. Addendum: Vaccinated/Unvaccinated Residents for COVID-19: If a vaccinated or unvaccinated resident test positive for COVID and there are no signs and symptoms present. They must quarantine 3-5 days on Covid Unit, resident may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of policies titled Self-Administration of Medications and Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (R) (#134) was assessed to self-administer medications. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record for R#134 revealed diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and dementia. During the initial interview and observation on 1/3/2023 at 11:50 a.m., with R#134 revealed a Trelegy inhaler was observed on the over bed table of the resident. R#134 revealed that she takes that for her breathing. Review of resident's electronic medical record revealed that Trelegy Ellipta Aerosol Powder Inhaler was last documented as given on 1/4/2023. Progress Note dated 1/1/2023 revealed that medication not available in med cart. On 1/4/2023 at 11:24 a.m., it was observed that Trelegy inhaler was still on the over bed table of R#134. On 1/5/2023 at 10:09 a.m., it was observed that Trelegy inhaler and Fluticasone propionate nasal spray were on the over bed table of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment related to dusty air intake vents, missing tiles, and disrepair of sinks on one of six halls (100 hall). Findings include: On 1/3/2023 at 9:49 a.m., an initial observation and interviews had begun, and the following were noted: 1. At 9:52 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted with dusty air intake vent. 2. At 9:59 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted with dusty air intake vent. 3. At 10:06 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with dusty air intake vent. The shared bathroom was noted to have a dripping faucet with rust-colored stains around the knobs and there was a missing tile on the bathroom wall. 4. At 10:29 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with dusty air intake vent. 5. At 10:41 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with dusty air intake vent. 6. At 11:03 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with dusty air intake vent. 7. At 11:27 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with dusty air intake…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and review of policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to administer oxygen to one resident (R) (#41) of ten residents receiving oxygen therapy. Findings include: On 1/3/2023 at 12:15 p.m., R#41 was observed in her bed. She was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 2.5 liters. She was also observed eating her lunch meal. She was pleasantly confused and stated that she uses oxygen all the time for her breathing. The humidification bottle was dated for 12/24/2022. There were no signs of distress noted. On 1/4/2023 at 3:23pm, R#41 was observed in her bed. The humidification bottle was dated 1/3/2023, and the resident was on 2.5 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. Review of the electronic medical record for R#41 revealed that resident had diagnoses including Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Shortness of Breath, Dependence on supplemental oxygen, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of physician orders for January 2023 for R#41 revealed that there was no order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview and policy review titled Hemodialysis Access Care, the facility failed to ensure the dialysis access site was monitored for one resident (R) (#59) receiving dialysis. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R#56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia and end stage renal disease (ESRD) with dialysis. The resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was coded as 14. Section O revealed resident was receiving dialysis. An interview with R#59 on 1/3/2023 at 12:08 p.m. revealed that she receives dialysis. She stated the facility does not always look at her dialysis site. She also revealed that she has never had problems with the site. Review of care plan for R#56, dated 4/9/2021, revealed resident needs dialysis related to diagnosis of ESRD. Interventions to care included to assess dialysis site per Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning adequately to allow residents to call for staff assistance for four resident rooms (102A, 102B, 106A and 106B) on one of six halls (100 hall). Findings include: Observations on 1/3/2023 at 10:15 a.m., during initial tour of resident rooms revealed the following: 1. On the 100 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A, the call light was tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 2. On the 100 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B, the call light was tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 3. On the 100 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A, the call light was tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did not light up and no sound was heard. 4. On the 100 Hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B, the call light was tested by pushing the red button. The light above the door did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Calhoun Crossing Of Journey LLCCalhoun, GA 1 of 5Clifton HeightsLouisville, KY 1 of 5Crossroads of Flowery Branch of Journey LLC, TheFlowery Branch, GA 1 of 5Fairburn Heights Of Journey LLCFairburn, GA 1 of 5Jasper Point Of Journey LLCJasper, GA 1 of 5Jesup Ridge of Journey LLCJesup, GA 1 of 5Kirtland Woods Of JourneyKirtland, OH 1 of 5Morgantown Heights Of JourneyMorgantown, WV 1 of 5Murray Woods Of Journey LLCChatsworth, GA 1 of 5Reserve at Appling of Journey LLC, TheAppling, GA 1 of 5Stanford CrossingStanford, KY 1 of 5Stone Mountain Run Of Journey LLCStone Mountain, GA 1 of 5Thomasville Vistas of Journey LLCThomasville, GA 1 of 5Tucker Park Crossing of Journey LLCTucker, GA 2 of 5Crossings At East Lake Of Journey Llc, TheDecatur, GA 2 of 5Fort Valley Crossing of Journey LLCFort Valley, GA 2 of 5Frankfort TrailsFrankfort, KY 2 of 5Glasgow Hills Of JourneyGlasgow, WV 2 of 5Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, TheFort Gaines, GA 2 of 5Warrenton Woods of Journey LLCWarrenton, GA 2 of 5Woods at Lumber City of Journey LLC, TheLumber City, GA 3 of 5Bainbridge Landing of Journey LLCBainbridge, GA 3 of 5Cartersville Crossing Of Journey LLCCartersville, GA 3 of 5Chardon WoodsChardon, OH 3 of 5Dublin Trails Of Journey LLCDublin, GA 3 of 5Riverside Valley Of JourneySaint Albans, WV 3 of 5Twin City Trails of Journey LLCTwin City, GA 3 of 5Vanceburg HillsVanceburg, KY 4 of 5Green River TrailsGreensburg, KY 4 of 5Roberta Trails of Journey LLCRoberta, GANot rated (Special Focus)Lyndon Crossing, LLCLouisville, KY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRASS GA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 04/01/2024
COPPER GA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 04/01/2024
GEM BSD GA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 04/01/2024
GOLD GA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 04/01/2024
SILVER GA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 04/01/2024
SILBERSTEIN, ARIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
CARE NETWORK HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
QUALITY REHAB MANAGEMENTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
BAILEY, TAKECIONAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
FENSTERSZAUB, SIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
KIRSCHNER, DEVORAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
MAZZOCHI, ANABELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
OBERLANDER, ZALMENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
PUGHSLEY, SONIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
QUINCY, LATRONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
SARJU, PAULAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2026
ATLANTIS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
HHC HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
RYTES COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
VIRTUE CLINICAL SOLUTIONSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
BUSSEY, LATISHAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
DAUM, KARLAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
HARRIS, SONIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$387K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 13%Other / private 6%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $387K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$249per resident / day
operating cost
$7,557per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$246per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115354. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next