Clifton Heights
446 Mt. Holly Avenue, Louisville, KY 40206 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (502) 897-1646 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609) — most recent Aug 2023
- inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.8% | 13.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 6.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.3% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.4% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.7% | 29.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.9% | 19.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 16.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.7% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.1% | 83.5% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.8–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 11.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 91.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective pain management regimen, based on a thorough assessment and a person-centered care plan, was implemented for 1 of 11 sampled residents receiving scheduled pain medications (Resident (R) 1). The facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered to R1, who had a history of chronic pain and required multiple daily doses of a potent opioid analgesic. The failure created ongoing, severe pain, and R1 also experienced withdrawal symptoms which he described as, The only way the pain was going away was if I died.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management, dated [DATE], revealed the facility must ensure pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The policy states that, in order to help a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's documentation and policy, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for six (6) out of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents. (Resident #7, Resident #4, Resident #70, Resident #15, Resident #89, and Resident 46). 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #7 from abuse. On 07/20/2023 the Executive Director (ED) received an anonymous call reporting an inappropriate relationship between a staff member and Resident #7 that involved text messages and nude photos. The facility, however, failed to protect the resident from abuse and continued to allow the staff member to work, gaining access to the resident to potentially abuse the resident further. Subsequently, on 07/26/2023, Resident #7 reported to the facility staff allegations of sexual abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #24, would come into his/her shower room while he/she was undressed, which made him/her feel uncomfortable and harassed. 2. On 07/24/2023, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, documents, Job Descriptions, and Plan of Correction (PoC) submitted for the 06/10/2023 and 09/13/2021 it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure it was administered in a manner to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Review of the facility's Standard Recertification and Abbreviated Plan of Correction (POC) for the 06/11/2023 survey revealed the facility was cited at 42 CFR 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (F609) failure to report allegations of abuse to State Agencies. During an Abbreviated/Partial Extended Survey initiated on 07/12/2023, the State Survey Agency (SSA) identified continued non-compliance in the area of 42 CFR 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (F609) on 07/29/2023. The facility's Administration failed to report an allegation received on 07/20/2023 of sexual abuse of a resident by a Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, review of the Administrator's Job Description, review of the Statement of Deficiencies (SoD) submitted for the 06/11/2023 and the Plan of Correction (POC) submitted for the 09/17/2021 survey and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective process in place to address systemic failures through regularly scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. As a result, the facility failed to ensure they developed, implemented, and maintained an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility was aware of potential allegations of abuse; however, failed to report to the State Survey Agency (SSA); conduct thorough investigations; develop and implement policies; monitor and audit identified non-compliance; and ensure the QAPI program comprehensively developed, implemented, and monitored its plan to ensure effectiveness in addressing repeat noncompliance and allegations of abuse to maintain substantial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its policy was implemented related to completing a thorough investigation, ensuring staff reported without fear of retaliation, and failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure measures were taken, to protect the residents from abuse for one (1) of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents, Resident #7. Review of the facility's Alleged Abuse Incident Nursing Description Note, dated 07/20/2023, revealed an anonymous call was received by the Executive Director (ED) during which the caller reported a relationship involving texting and sending inappropriate pictures via text messages to a resident (Resident #7) by a facility staff Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #24). Interview with Resident #7 and with facility staff revealed they were afraid to report allegations of abuse, out of fear of retaliation. Therefore, the allegation of sexual abuse was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents and policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure allegations of sexual and physical abuse were reported to State Agencies and local law authorities immediately, but no later than two (2) hours after the allegations were made for two (2) of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents ( Residents #7 and #1). 1. On 07/20/2023 the Executive Director (ED) received an anonymous call reporting an inappropriate relationship between a staff member and Resident #7 that involved text messages and nude photos. Review of the facility's documentation; however, revealed the facility failed to notify/report the allegations of potential abuse to the state agencies and law enforcement, to protect its resident, even though staff had been trained on abuse to include reporting requirements. 2. On 12/10/2022 Resident #1 ran into the hallway yelling help me, she is hitting me. However, LPN #11 failed to report the allegation as abuse. The facility's failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, that would meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one (1) of thirty-eight (38) sampled residents (Resident #48). On 05/29/2023, Resident #48 was found by the driver of a transportation company seated in the lobby of the facility in his/her wheelchair, alone and unresponsive. The driver of the transportation company attempted to locate the facility staff but was unable to locate staff to assist the resident, and he attempted to call the facility several times and no one answered the phone. Subsequently, the driver of the transportation company drove the resident to his/her dialysis appointment, which was approximately eight (8) minutes away from the facility. Once the resident arrived at the dialysis clinic, the transportation driver alerted the dialysis staff to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's policies and investigations, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan was developed and/or implemented for four (4) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Residents #160, #310, #359, and #161). 1. Resident #160 expressed to staff his/her desire to be discharged home and he/she was anxious about his/her upcoming court hearing. The resident reported his/her concerns to staff on [DATE]; the week of [DATE], and on [DATE]; however, the facility failed to develop the resident's individualized person-centered care plan to include adequate supervision and monitoring. Therefore, on [DATE], the resident exited his/her window, climbed on a table with a chair stacked on top of the table and climbed across the facility's six (6) foot fence. The facility was unaware of the resident's whereabouts for approximately one (1) day, twelve (12) hours, and forty-five (45) minutes. 2. Review of Resident #310's Comprehensive Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices necessary to prevent accidents for three (3) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Residents #160, #161, and #359). 1. On 04/22/2022 at approximately 12:30 AM, Resident #160 exited the facility through his/her window without staff's knowledge. The facility was unaware of Resident #160's whereabouts until a local shelter notified staff by telephone on 04/23/2022 at 11:15 AM of the resident's location. The resident was last seen on 04/21/2022 at 10:30 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13, who checked his/her blood sugar and administered insulin as ordered at that time. Review of the local weather for 04/22/2022, per historical data, showed a low temperature of fifty-nine (59) degrees Fahrenheit with high temperature around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-22 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 11 (Resident (R)1) sampled residents received diagnostic x-ray services in a timely manner, which created a delay in reporting any abnormal results to the physician and/or Nurse Practitioner, who had ordered the x-ray. After R1 sustained a fall, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received necessary follow-up, including implementation of physician orders for bilateral lower extremity (BLE) X-rays. R1 reported having severe leg pain and displayed swelling, changes in condition, and was eventually found to have a displaced tibia and fibula fracture that remained undiagnosed for approximately three days after his fall. R1 ultimately required surgery and 10 days of hospitalization in response. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Verbal Orders, revised 02/14/2024, revealed that Physician orders may be received by telephone, by a licensed nurse or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and safe physical environment to help prevent the presence of pests within resident care areas. interviews and observations during survey revealed concerns with the presence of pests.The findings include:Review of facility policy, Pest Control Program, implemented, 02/01/2024, revealed a local contractor provided preventative treatment monthly and as needed. Further review revealed the most recent treatment provided by the contractor was on 09/19/2025. Observations revealed insect/pest activity/residue in resident rooms and/or resident care areas during environmental rounds. Evidence of ongoing pest (insect) presence observed with pest residue recurring in reports noted upon re-entry after prior treatment last documented pest control entry 09/18/2025.Observations during survey, on 09/18/2025 at approximately 9:00AM and 09/19/2025, approximately 9:00 AM revealed insect carcasses (appeared to be cockroaches) in resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident requiring tracheotomy care received treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan, and facility policy. The failure had the potential to result in respiratory complications, infections, and compromised airway safety for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident(R)32.The findings include:Review of facility policy, Tracheostomy Care Education, dated 2013, revealed tracheostomy care is the process of aseptically cleaning the tracheostomy tube and stoma site. Additionally, the policy indicated to follow relevant infection control procedures as appropriate.Review of facility record revealed the facility admitted R32 on 05/16/2025 with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, epilepsy unspecified, dysphagia, gastrostomy status. The facility assessed R32 on 06/14/2025 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating impaired cognition. During observation of tracheostomy care on 10/02/2025 at approximately 11:06 AM for R32,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place to prevent the diversion of the resident's-controlled drugs for eight (8) out of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents (Resident #6, Resident #11, Resident #10, Resident #16, Resident #21, Resident #23, Resident #25, and Resident #42). On 05/24/2023, the Narcotic count at 3:00 PM revealed Resident #6 was missing five (5) Gabapentin; Resident #11 was missing one (1) Gabapentin; and Resident #10 was missing one (1) Tramadol. The facility's investigation determined the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 had signed out too many pills that could not be accounted for. On 07/12/2022 Residents #16, #21, #23, #25, and #42 had Hydrocodone that was signed out by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14. Record review revealed the LPN documented the residents received their medications. However, review of the facility's investigation revealed the residents stated they did not receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident had communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for one (1) out of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents, Resident #48. On 05/29/2023 the transport driver arrived at the facility to pick up Resident #48 for transport to the Dialysis Center and found Resident #48 alone in the lobby and unable to answer the phone to allow the driver into the facility. The driver attempted to call the facility several times and no one answered the phone to let the driver in. The driver stated he had to wait several minutes outside the facility until a staff member reporting for their shift arrived and opened the door so he could transport Resident #48 to the Dialysis Center. In addition, Resident #48 arrived to the Dialysis Center unresponsive the Dialysis Center attempted to call the facility several times to communicate a change in Resident #48's condition upon arrival to the center. The first time a call was attempted, the center…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices necessary to prevent accidents for two (2) out of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents (Residents #12 and Resident #74). 1. On the 06/11/2023 Standard Extended/Recertification/ Abbreviated Survey, Immediate Jeopardy was identified in the area of 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care ( F689). The State Survey Agency (SSA) exited the facility with Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) onging. The SSA concluded the first (1st) revisit, to remove the IJ, on 06/29/2023 and the facility had implemented corrective actions to remove the IJ, prior to the SSA exit. On 08/11/2023, the SSA concluded the Abbreviated Survey and found continued non-compliance related to complaint number, KY #39861 with Resident #74, in the area of F689. The complaint was identified as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Observations of the linen storage revealed linens were not available to provide resident grooming, hygiene, and a comfortable bed for five (5) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Residents #6, #14, #25, #53 and #78). Observation of residents' pillows on their beds were not in good condition. The pillows were covered with a pillowcase, but the condition of the pillows exposed the resident to the potential unsanitary environment as the barrier on the pillowcase was no longer intact. The facility failed to ensure the residents were provided the necessary linens to provide for proper grooming, hygiene, and clean, sanitary, and comfortable beds. The findings include: Review of Resident #65's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/04/2023 with diagnoses of Unspecified Spina Bifida with Hydrocephalus, Neuromuscular Dysfunction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions. Observations, during the lunch tray line on 06/06/2023, revealed the dish covers and bowls being used were wet. The Dietary Director was observed drying dishware with a paper towel. Further observation revealed the kitchen ingredient bins were not labeled or dated. The findings include: 1. Observations, on 06/06/2023 at 11:55 AM, during the kitchen tour revealed three (3) ingredient bins were not labeled and dated. In an interview, on 06/09/2023 at 3:38 PM, Cook/Night Supervisor #2 stated ingredients bins which contained sugar, flour, and rice were to be labeled and dated. The Cook/Night Supervisor #2 stated the bins were washed before adding more products. The Cook/Night Supervisor #2 further stated if the bins were not labeled the product inside could be out of date and staff would not know the last date the bin was cleaned. In an interview, on 06/09/2023 at 3:40 PM, Cook/Diet Aide Floater #3 stated the ingredients bins were to be labeled for safe use. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents' right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident #65). Observation of Resident #65's mobility was limited to his/her wheelchair. The resident was unable to get to the bathroom sink for personal hygiene due to his/her wheelchair not fitting through the bathroom door. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, revealed appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #65 on 01/04/2023 with diagnoses of Unspecified Spina Bifida with Hydrocephalus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within two (2) hours for one of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident #34). On 05/05/2023, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #18 heard an allegation from Resident #82 that Resident #312 groped Resident #34's genitals. However, CNA #18 stated she reported this to Registered Nurse (RN) #5 on 05/05/2023. However, staff failed to report this allegation to the Executive Director until four (4) days later on 05/09/2023. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, dated 09/2022, revealed the facility's staff reported allegations of abuse to the abuse coordinator immediately. Further review revealed that immediately was defined as within two (2) hours for an allegation involving abuse. Review of the facility's investigation revealed CNA #18 was in the dining room at lunch on 05/05/2023 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident #359). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 02/20/2023, revealed the resident was not assessed accurately for pressure. The MDS coded Resident #359 as having no pressure ulcer upon admission, however, it was documented by the Advanced Practice Nurse Practitioner (APRN) that the resident had a pressure wound present on his/her right buttock. The findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) MDS 3.0 Manual revealed the steps for skin assessments included: (1) Review the medical record, including skin care flow sheets or other skin tracking forms, nurses' notes, and pressure ulcer/injury risk assessments; (2) Speak with the treatment nurse and direct care staff on all shifts to confirm conclusions from the medical record review and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 15 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to promote the healing of existing pressure ulcers/injuries for one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident #359). Resident #359's pressure wound was identified by the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), on admission. However, the Nursing admission Assessment and the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) failed to include this information. As a result, treatment for the wound was not provided for over a week following admission. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries, revised April 2020, revealed the facility's policy included assessment of the resident on admission for existing pressure injury risk factors and conducting a comprehensive skin assessment upon admission. The facility would also inspect the resident's skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of Resident #359's closed record, revealed the facility admitted the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure that each resident, who was incontinent of bladder and bowel on admission, received services and assistance to maintain continence for one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident #65). Resident #65 had a neurogenic bladder and paraplegia. He/She had an indwelling suprapubic catheter and a colostomy. The resident utilized adult briefs because his/her catheter leaked. Resident #65 was unable to feel when he/she was wet due to his/her medical condition. Observation revealed the resident was found lying in a wet brief that had soaked through to his/her bedding. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, revealed appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with elimination. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents received colostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents out of a total sample of twenty-four (24) residents (Resident #65). Resident #65 had a colostomy and was unable to get out of bed without the use of a Hoyer ([NAME] of mechanical lift) lift. Resident #65 waited until noon for staff to assist with emptying his/her colostomy bag. Resident #65 was unable to obtain the supplies required for the care of his/her colostomy without the staff's assistance. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, revealed appropriate care and services were to be provided for residents who were unable to carry out their ADLs independently, with the consent of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy it was determined the facility failed to label and date tube feeding for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, who received tube feedings (Resident #5). Observations on [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE] revealed the tube feeding was not labeled with the name, rate, formula, time, and date. Further observation revealed the IV (intravenous) flushes were not labeled or dated on [DATE]. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Nutrition dated 11/2018 revealed the policy did not address labeling the tube feeding. During interview with the Registered Nurse Supervisor on [DATE] at 10:30 AM, she stated that orders for enteral nutrition included the complete name for the enteral nutrition product, volume, rate of administration, enterable access device and instructions for flushing. Review of the Abbott (brand name) Nutrition Product Reference titled, Ready to Hang Suggested Setup Procedure, dated 2021-2022, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility policy review, and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to dignity for one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Resident #310). The facility failed to maintain the nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen in the correct position on the resident's face for Resident #310. Resident #310 became hypoxic and confused, smeared feces on his/her body, and walked in the hallways undressed while covered in feces. While in this hypoxic state, the resident stated a staff member was raping him/her; however, when the supplemental oxygen was put back on the resident, he/she recanted his/her statement. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 02/2021, revealed the residents in the facility had the right to a dignified existence. Review of the facility's investigation into sexual abuse allegations made by Resident #310 on [DATE] revealed the resident removed his/her supplemental oxygen, became confused, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the storage of all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. Observation of the medication pass revealed a Lantus insulin pen was left unattended on a medication cart. Further observations revealed the medication, Senna, was left in a cup, unattended, at the nursing station and accessible to residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised November 2020 revealed drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments. Observation on 06/08/2023 at 9:01 AM, revealed a syringe of Lantus insulin, along with diabetic test strips on top of an unattended medication cart. The Certified Medication Technician (CMT)/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #19, who had just started using the cart, took the medication and locked it into the cart. During interview with CMT/CNA #19, on 06/08/2023 at 1:40 PM, she stated that the Lantus that was left on the medication cart earlier would have been left from the nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three (3) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents (Residents #24, #65, and #86). There was no Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) sign on the door for Resident #24's and Resident #86's room. Resident #65's door did not have an EBP sign, and staff did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing catheter care. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Isolation- Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions, dated 08/2019, revealed when the Infection Preventionist identified a resident required any type of precautions, he or she would determine the appropriate signage to be posted on the door and ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure dishes were sanitized prior to use. Observation revealed the dishwasher wash cycle water temperature was below the required temperature for sanitation per the manufacture's recommendation. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Dishwashing, not dated, revealed dishes, pot, and pans would be washed using procedures, chemical, and equipment that resulted in clean, sanitized dishes, pans, flatware, and utensils. Dishwashing temperatures were logged at each meal on the Dish Machine Temperature Log, and temperatures, as required by the manufacturer, were 150 degrees F for the wash and 180 degrees F for the rinse. Review of the Manufacturer Instructions for the facility's dishwasher, dated February 2006, revealed the recommendations for the wash cycle was 160 degrees F. Observation of the dishwasher, on 02/28/19 at 9:10 AM, revealed the wash temperature reached 142 degrees F on the first attempt. The dishes from nightshift went through the dishwasher seven (7) times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a clean, homelike environment for the residents on three (3) of four (4) halls, the West, North, and East Halls. Observations revealed windows in resident rooms and common areas were soiled with a cloudy, grayish haze, spider webs, and dried clumps of grass. In addition, the utility room across from the nurses' station, the medication room, and the ceiling fan in the nurses' station were soiled. The findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Rights revealed the resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. 1. The facility did not provide a policy for maintenance and cleaning of windows. Observation of the [NAME] Hall, on 03/01/19 at 11:35 AM, revealed the windows in room [ROOM NUMBER] were heavily soiled with a grayish discoloration and there were dried grass and spider webs between the windows and the screen. Observation of the [NAME] Hall Exit Door, on 03/01/19 at 11:36 AM, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-01 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and personnel file reviews, it was determined the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for seven (7) of eight (8) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) files reviewed, CNA #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #11. The findings include: Review of the facility's personnel file for CNAs #3, #4, #5, #7, and #11 revealed their date of hire (DOH) was 11/01/16. There were no annual performance reviews for the last twelve (12) months. Review of the facility's personnel file for CNA #6, revealed her DOH was on 04/05/17. There was no performance review during her last twelve (12) months of facility employment. Review of the facility's personnel file for CNA #8, revealed her DOH was on 01/10/18. There was no performance review for her last twelve (12) months of employment at the facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 03/01/19 at 11:56 AM, revealed she joined the facility within the past ten (10) months, and did not complete any CNA annual performance reviews. She stated she had a change in staff, which was the reason she had held off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to implement the care plan for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, Resident #36. The resident was to have treatments administered to his/her pressure ulcer and observation revealed the nurse did not perform glove changes and hand hygiene during wound care to prevent possible complications, per the care plan. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plan, not dated, revealed an individualized comprehensive care plan to included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs was developed for each resident. Each resident's comprehensive care plan was designed to reflect treatment goals, timetable, and objectives in measurable outcomes. The care plan was designed to aid in preventing or reducing decline in the resident's functional status and /or functional levels. Review of the facility's policy, Infection Control, revised December 2016, revealed Standard Precautions would be used in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was notified of quarterly care plan meetings to allow for participation in care goals for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #24. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Care Planning, not dated, revealed the resident, the resident's family and/or legal representative, guardian, or surrogate were encouraged to participate in the development and revision to the care plan. Review of the facility's Resident Rights revealed the resident had the right to participate in the development and implementation of the person centered care plan, including but not limited to, the right to participate in establishing the expected goals and outcomes of care and any other factors related to the effectiveness of the plan of care. Review of the clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #24 on 04/19/18, with diagnoses to include Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Hypertension. Further review of the record revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented to reflect the care and services provided to residents for two (2) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #28 and #32. Record review revealed missing documentation related to the residents' wound care. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Charting and Documentation, revised April 2008, revealed services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, would be documented in the resident's medical record. In addition, observations, medications administered, and services performed should be documented in the resident's clinical record. Documentation of procedures and treatments might include: the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided; the name and title of the individual(s) who provided the care; the assessment data and/or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure/treatment; how the resident tolerated the procedure/treatment; whether the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control techniques during wound care for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents, Resident #28 and #36. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Infection Control, revised December 2016, revealed Standard Precautions would be used in the care of all residents regardless of diagnoses, or suspected or confirmed infection status. Standard precautions presumed that all blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin and mucous membranes might contain transmissible infectious agents. Standard precautions included hand hygiene by handwashing with soap, or use of alcohol-based hand rubs (gels, foams, rinses) that did not require access to water. Gloves should be worn when there was anticipated direct contact with blood, body fluids, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, and other potentially infected material. Gloves should be changed, as necessary, during care of a resident to prevent cross-contamination from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the sit to stand lift manual, it was determined the facility failed to maintain equipment safe for resident use on one (1) of four (4) halls, the North Hall. Observation and interview revealed a sit to stand lift did not function properly and was available for staff use. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was maintained per manufacturer recommendation. Observation of the dishwasher revealed it did not reach the required wash cycle temperature of 160 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy, Accidents/Incidents, revised April 2013, revealed the facility would provide a safe and secure environment for staff and residents. Review of the Instruction Manual for the facility's sit to stand lift, not dated, revealed the lift was subject to wear and tear, and the following actions must be performed when specified to ensure the product remained within its original manufacturing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- JOURNEY CZ OF KY LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOURNEY CZ OF KY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/01/2024 |
| JOURNEY CZ KY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/01/2024 |
| MCGUINNESS, BERNARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| KAPOOR, SANDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/23/2025 |
| SMITH, RHONDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185176. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.