Warrenton Woods of Journey LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 48.5 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a PASARR for one resident (R)52. This deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving appropriate services. The census was 51. Findings Include:The facility submitted a document titled admission Guideline The section titled What is a PASARR? states the following, A PASARR screening is completed prior to admission or for any significant status change to determine if they are indicators of mental and/or mental retardation. This screening is intended to assess whether an individual is appropriate for nursing home placement. If admitting from the hospital, the case manager or discharge planner at that facility will typically do the PASARR. If admitting from home, the PASARR is typically completed by the facility. This is usually done by the social worker but could also be completed by admissions or the business office manager. EVERY admission MUST HAVE A PASARR APPROVED PRIOR TO admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure that one of four sampled residents (R) (R35) was free from significant medication errors. This deficient practice had the potential to place R35 at increased risk of adverse effects from medications.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, revised 2/14/2024, revealed the Policy section stated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included, . 10. Review MAR [medication administration record] to identify medication to be administered. 11. Compare the medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with the MAR to verify the resident name,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Date Marking for Food Safety, the facility failed to discard refrigerator food by expiration dates and ensure proper food labeling, storage, and dating, and to ensure dishwasher and sink testing strips were not expired. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Date Marking for Food Safety revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines for Staffing: . 2. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. 5. The discard day or date may not exceed the manufacturer's use-by-date, or four days, whichever is earliest. During the initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 2/22/2024 at 7:49 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed two one-gallon pitchers of brown-like liquid labeled sweet-tea with an expiration date of 2/21/2025 and two five-pound bags of diced onions with an expiration date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment was in working order as evidenced by the kitchen hood extinguishing system not operating. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 50 residents receiving an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings include: A review of the facility-provided document titled Kitchen Auto Extinguishing Systems, dated 1/30/2025, revealed the kitchen hood passed the inspection, and inspection results documented that the exhaust fan(s) were not operable. A review of the facility's work order from an electrical service dated 2/22/2025 revealed an on-site inspection that documented there was no voltage to the kitchen hood motor, and the recommendation was made to order a motor. A review of the facility's work order from an electrical service dated 2/24/2025 revealed an on-site service visit documented the kitchen hood motor was operating, and it had no belt. The belt was replaced, and the hood was working. During the initial kitchen tour and observation on 2/22/2025 at 7:49 am,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, the facility failed to maintain dignity by ensuring a dignity bag was provided for one of four residents (R) R51 who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity under the Compliance Guidelines section revealed, 1. All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights . 12. Maintain resident privacy. Review of medical records revealed, R51 admitted with diagnoses but not limited to muscle weakness (generalized), megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, other inflammatory disorders of penis. Review R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Patterns) revealed, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Trust Fund Account, the facility failed to provide resident trust fund account quarterly statements for two of three residents (R) (R24 and R38) reviewed. There were 34 resident trust fund accounts that were managed by the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who had a personal funds account with the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Trust Fund Account, dated 1/9/2022, revealed the Quarterly Statements section included, These are to be done quarterly. Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) sends them to your facility to be given to the residents. Quarterly statements are to be distributed by the 15th of the month. 1. Review of R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) End of Prospective Payment System (PPS) Part A Stay assessment dated [DATE] revealed section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents' (R) (R38 and R8) trust fund accounts remained under the $2,000.00 limit to maintain eligibility for Medicaid services. There were 34 residents with trust fund accounts that were managed by the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who had a personal funds account with the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Trust Fund Account, dated 1/9/2022, revealed the Spend Downs section included Accounts over $2,000 are to be spent down within 10 days of reaching that amount. 1. Review of R38's Resident Fund Statement dated 10/1/2024 through 12/31/2024 revealed a beginning balance of $2801.28 and an ending balance of $3743.51. 2. Review of the facility-provided document titled Trial Balance revealed that R8's balance on 2/22/2025 was $2075.58. In an interview on 2/23/2025 at 1:00 pm, the Regional Human Resource Coordinator confirmed that R38 and R8's accounts exceeded the $2,000 limit to maintain eligibility for Medicaid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for eight of 54 resident rooms on two of four halls and in the main dining room (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER] on Hall 100 and Hall 307). These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary and unsafe living environment and a potential for diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment revealed the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included, 1. The facility will create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that deemphasizes the institutional character of the setting. Observations on 2/22/2025 from 10:10 am to 10:40 am revealed eight ceiling tiles in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of seven residents (R) (R36) receiving respiratory care received respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice and regulatory requirements. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen (O2) therapy and ensure proper storage and handling of O2 equipment. The deficient practice had the potential to place R36 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A review of R36's face sheet revealed they were admitted with diagnoses not limited to chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, cardiomyopathy due to drug and external agent, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and hemiplegia following cerebral infarction. A review of R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring, the facility failed to ensure the infection control process was followed during glucometer (a device used to test blood sugar results) use for one of eight residents (R) R104) with a physician order for a glucometer reading. The deficient practices had the potential to place residents with a physician's order for glucometer testing at risk of infection due to cross-contamination and increase the spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring, revealed the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included .3. The nurse will abide by the infection control practices of cleaning and disinfection of the glucometer as per the manufacturer's instructions and in accordance with the facility's glucometer disinfection policy. An observation on 2/23/2025 at 11:05 am of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA performing a glucometer test on R104 revealed that LPN AA gathered the supplies, entered the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $660K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA