Thomasville Vistas of Journey LLC
120 Skyline Drive, Thomasville, GA 31757 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 52 certified beds · (229) 225-1049 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,730 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.2% | 15.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.6% | 5.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 53.1% | 11.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.3% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.9% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.2% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.5% | 19.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.5% | 78.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.6% | 25.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.0% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.79 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.90 | 1.80 | typical |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 18.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory orders were obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 13 residents (R) (R21). This failure resulted in actual harm on 9/19/2023 when R21 was admitted to the local hospital and required a blood transfusion after the facility failed to obtain ordered labs for March 2023 and June 2023 facility received lab results on September 19, 2023, indicating R21 had a hemoglobin level of 5.9 g/dl (grams per deciliter) normal range was 13.5 - 17.5 g/dl. Findings: Record review revealed R21 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of but not limited to, Idiopathic gout, cerebral infarction, aphasia, hemiplegia, Diabetes mellitus, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, angina pectoris, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy. Physician order dated 3/7/2023 indicated to collect labs CBC (complete blood count) w (with) diff Q (every) three months March/June/September/December.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 17 Residents (R) (R2, R4, R5, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20) call lights were within reach while the residents were in their bed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause delayed assistance, potential for falls and unmet needs. The facility census is 49 residents. Findings include: All observations on 06/02/2026 and 06/08/2026 were made in the presence of the Maintenance Director during call light functional checks and verification of nonfunctional call lights. 1. Review of the admission Record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic combined systolic congestive and diastolic congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, protein-calorie malnutrition, and hypertension. Review of the care plan dated 12/31/2025 revealed R2 has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit and is at risk for not having needs met in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure that call light communication system was functioning to allow the residents to call for assistance in four out of 25 residents' rooms (114A, 109B, 112B, 201A). Findings include:During an observation on 06/02/2026 at 1:28 PM, with the Maintenance Director, each residents' room call lights were checked and the following lights were non-operative and did not respond when the call light button was pressed for the following rooms. Observation on 06/02/2026 at 1:34 PM, revealed that the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A was not functioning. When activated, the light above the resident's door did not illuminate to indicate a request for assistance. An observation on 06/02/2026 at 1:38 PM revealed that the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]-B was not functioning. No alternative method for the resident to request assistance was observed.Observation on 06/02/2026 at 1:42 PM revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]-B did not have a functioning call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Food safety requirements the facility failed to label, store, prepare and discard food under sanitary conditions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen floors and equipment used for residents. The deficient practices created an unsanitary kitchen environment that increased the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illness for 43 of 47 residents receiving oral diets.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Food safety requirements, implemented on 4/1/2025 documented under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines number 3- iv. Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including, but not limited to leftovers so it is used by its use by date or frozen discarded. Documented under 7.e Hairnets should be worn when cooking, preparing, or assembling food, such as stirring pots or assembling the ingredients of a salad.During the initial observation tour of the kitchen on 12/16/2025 beginning at 8:55 am with the Registered Dietician (RD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse the facility failed to ensure the outdoor garbage and refuse area was maintained in a sanitary manner, creating the potential for harboring pests and insects. The facility census was 47.Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse last revised on 3/26/2025 documented: 7. Refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. Surrounding area shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris and insect/rodent attractions are minimized.Observations on 12/16/2025 at 10:06 am, 12/17/2025 at 8:38 am, and 12/18/2025 at 8:45 am revealed trash scattered on the ground outside of the dumpster including paper, plastic, and food container waste products. In addition, there were wooden pallets leaning against the wooden fence surrounding the dumpster. Interview on 12/18/2025 at 10:01 am with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Self Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure unauthorized medications were not stored at the bedside for four residents (R) (R5, R21, R36 and R45) of 40 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential for other residents and visitors to access unsecured medications stored in the residens' rooms. Findings include: A review of the facilities policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 2024 revealed that a resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT) has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. Guideline number 4. reveals that results of the IDT assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-administration assessment form and placed in resident's medical record. Bedside medication storage is permitted if it does not present a risk to other residents and stored in a manner that prevents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to nail care and pain management for three of 40 sampled residents (R) (R24, R35 and R42). The deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of life for the residents.Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 2/2/2025 documented that the facility was to Develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, than includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a residents' medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the residents' assessment and meet professional standards of quality. 1. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, the facility failed to ensure that Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care services were provided for two of 40 sampled residents (R) (R35 and R42) related to nail care. This failure placed the residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings include: A Review of the facility's policy revised on 1/14/2025 titled Activities of Daily Living documented Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. Under policy explanation and compliance guidelines 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 1. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of policy titled, Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability, the facility failed to reconcile controlled narcotic medications for one resident (R) (R24) out of 40 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of clinical complications and drug diversion. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability dated 2024 documented: the facility promotes safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. Documented under General Protocols: (F) All controlled substances are accounted for obtained from a non-automated medication cart or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form.the dose noted on the usage form or entered into the automated dispensing system must match the dose recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), Controlled Drug Record, or other facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy titled, Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). A total of 36 medication opportunities were observed, with three errors for one resident (R) (R23) by one nurse giving medications resulting in an 8.33% medication error rate. This deficient practice has the potential to place residents at risk of clinical complications and diminished quality of life. Findings include:A review of the policy titled Medication Administration, dated 2025 documented the principles of medication administration include the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right route, right time, and right documentation. Review medication administration record (MAR) and compared to medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with medication administration record (MAR) to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time.A review of physician orders for R23 revealed:-Buspirone HCL [hydrochloride] oral table give 20mg [milligrams] by mouth three times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and the facility policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, Hand Hygiene, and Transmission Based Precautions, the facility failed to follow safe and appropriate infection control practices for two of five residents (R) (R 16 and R 31) reviewed for infection control and one room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on one of three hallways observed for Transmission based precautions. These deficient practices have the potential to place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infections.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 8/1/2025 documented under policy statement the facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. In addition, regarding linens on page four documented solid linen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 11 sampled residents (R) (R4 and R5) were not served identified food allergens. The deficient practice had the potential to place R4 and R5 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Review of R4's admission Record revealed diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and vitamin deficiency. The admission Record revealed shellfish products listed in the allergies section. Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/6/2025, revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment). Review of R4's Order Summary Report active orders as of 12/1/2024 revealed an allergy to shellfish products. Review of R4's Progress Notes revealed an entry dated 12/10/2024 that the resident did not have any reactions or issues during this shift. An entry dated 12/11/2024 noted that R4 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control processes during wound care for one of one residents (R) (R3) observed for wound care from a sample of 11 residents. The deficient practice increased the risk of staff spreading infection to other residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 4/1/2024, revealed the Policy section included, It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. 3. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: 3a. Make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room. Noted: face protection may also be needed if performing activity with risk of splash or spray (i.e., wound irrigation, tracheostomy care). 3b. PPE for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities and my not need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705D Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 2 2024 (January 1 - March 31), the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 hours within a 24-hour period on 1/7/2024, 1/21/2024, 2/4/2024, 2/18/2024, 3/3/2024, 3/17/2024 and 3/31/2024. The facility census was 40 residents. Findings include: Review of the most recent PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY Quarter 2 2024 (January 1 - March 31) revealed the facility triggered for No RN Hours which indicated four or more days within the Quarter with no RN hours for the following dates: 1/7/2024, 1/21/2024, 2/4/2024, 2/18/2024, 3/3/2024, 3/17/2024 and 3/31/2024. Review of the form titled, [Facility Name] Daily Nursing Sheet, dated 1/7/2024 revealed, there was not a registered nurse scheduled on the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd shifts. Further review revealed on 1/21/2024, 2/4/2024, 2/18/2024, 3/3/2024, 3/17/2024, and 3/31/2024 there was RN coverage eight hours on 1st shift. Review of the form titled, Daily Staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure recipe for puree carrots and chicken were followed to preserve nutritional value of food for residents receiving a pureed diet. The facility also failed to ensure residents consuming a puree diet were served the recommended three ounces (oz) of protein during meal service. Findings: Review of the untiled document submitted by the Dietary Manager with scoop number, diameter capacity (in ounces) and color (color of scoop handle) revealed the number 16 scoop that was used to measure the puree foods had the following: Number 16 -Diameter 2 1/4 inches/5.72 cm (Centimeters), Capacity - 2 3/4 0z. The number 16 scoop did not provide the needed three ounces of protein per resident. Review of the document titled, Quantified Recipe (Recipe #220) for baked chicken revealed the following: portion size: number 8 scoop, serving utensil #8 scoop, baked chicken 30z SCR. 1. Prepare according to ground recipe. Stock Chicken/soup base for thinning. Recipe #249 Seasoned carrots, portion size #16 scoop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Used By Dating Guideline, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated, failed to discard expired foods by expiration date, and failed to ensure ice machine was kept clean and free of lime and calcium buildup. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 36 of 40 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Used By Dating Guideline Dated 5/1/2011 revealed under Section 1: foods that have been mixed with other ingredients, prepared in any way, or portioned out include, but are not limited to juices, thickened beverages, canned fruit, unused portions, prepared salads, cut fruits/vegetables, roasted/sliced meats use by date-three days after preparation. Observation on 8/9/2024 at 7:50 am revealed in the reach in cooler located to the right of the main kitchen a small steamtable pan of tuna salad that was unlabeled and dated, a bag of cooked macaroni noodles that were not label or dated, 16 oz (ounce) bottle of opened Zesty Italian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, the facility failed to promote, maintain, and protect residents' dignity for two of three residents (R11, R20) with an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity under the section titled Policy revealed, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote residents rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. 1. Review of R11's Face Sheet revealed diagnoses that included but not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant, retention of urine, disorders of urinary system, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of R11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a concurring Physician's signature on a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order for one resident (R) (R29) of two residents reviewed for DNR. Findings include: Record review of R29's medical record revealed the following diagnoses but not limited to Alzheimer 's Disease, paranoid schizophrenia, and hyperlipidemia. Record review revealed that R29's original admission date to the facility was 5/4/2022 and re-admission date was 11/22/2023. R29's face sheet and medical record revealed that resident did not have a Power of Attorney (POA) or Legal Guardian listed. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status Score (BIMS) of four which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The most recent Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of two which also indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of copy of Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR) indicated the signature of an Authorized Person was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a consistent home-like environment free from missing floor tiles, peeling paint on walls, rust on resident equipment (raise toilet seats), and an odor-free environment in which odors were consistently present where residents resided on one of two halls (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and shower room on 300 hall) . Findings include: 1.Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom on 8/9/2024 at 8:26 am and 2:00 pm and 8/10/2024 at 8:13 am and 2:00 pm revealed the frame of a raised toilet seat coated with dark brown substances. 2. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom on 8/9/2024 at 8:27 am and 8/10/2024 at 8:14 am revealed the frame of a raised toilet seat coated with dark brown substances. Continued observation revealed missing shower fixture (missing shower head) protruding from the wall with ragged edges, stained tiles covered with dark sticky brown substances on the tile around the commode. A strong…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Hemodialysis, the facility failed to provide evidence of ongoing monitoring and care of a dialysis access site and failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for one of one resident (R) (R31) reviewed for dialysis services. This deficient practice had the potential to place R31 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis, dated 2/12/2022, under the section titled Policy revealed, This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis. Under the section titled Purpose revealed, The facility will assure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Assessment Frequency/Timelines and Discharge Planning Process, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed and transmitted within 14 days of discharge for one Resident (R) (R37). Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Assessment Frequency/Timelines revealed under Policy: The purpose of this policy is to provide a system to complete standardized assessments in a timely manner, according to the current RAI Manual. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 6. A OBRA discharge assessment will be completed within 14 days of the discharge. Review of the undated facility policy titled Discharge Planning Process under Procedure: number 11. The evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan will be completely documented on a timely basis in the clinical record. Record review for R37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to follow the care plan for one of 26 sampled residents (R) (R31). Specifically, the facility failed to follow the care plan for R31's hemodialysis. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans under the section titled, Policy revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident 's medical ,nursing , and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident 's comprehensive assessment. Under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, (2). The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment. (3) a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident 's highest practicable physical, mental, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and the facility policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from potential accident hazard by failing to ensure an oxygen cylinder was secure in a cylinder holder for one resident (R), R20 out of ten residents receiving oxygen therapy. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Concentrator stated 2. Oxygen is administered under orders of the attending physicians, except in the case of an emergency. 6. Oxygen warning signs must be placed on the door of the resident 's room where oxygen is in use. 8. Storage of oxygen shall be in accordance with the facility Oxygen Safety Policy. Observation on 8/9/2024 at 9:33 am pm revealed an unsecured oxygen cylinder sitting on the floor of R20's room in front of an adjoining bathroom door. If the bathroom door was open the oxygen cylinder tank could have easily been tipped over. At the time of the observation, R20 was observed lying in bed in his room and receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula. Record review of R20's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, the facility failed to have a Physician's order for one resident (R,) R20, of eight residents with indwelling catheters. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that R20's catheter tubing was not coiled and correctly position to prevent obstruction of urinary flow. Findings include: Record review of R20's medical record revealed the following diagnoses but not limited to retention of urine unspecified and chronic kidney disease. Record review revealed that resident has a history of urinary tract infections and sepsis. Record review did not reveal an active order for an indwelling catheter. Record review of Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status Score (BIMS) that indicated severe cognitive impairment. Section H revealed an assessment for catheter use. Observation on 8/9/2024 at 8:10 am revealed R20 lying in bed with catheter attachment and tubing touching the floor. During a secondary observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered in accordance with the physician order for one of eight residents (R) R20 receiving oxygen therapy. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen signage was placed on the resident 's door. The deficient practice had the potential for respiratory difficulty for R20. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Concentrator stated 2. Oxygen is administered under orders of the attending physicians, except in the case of an emergency. 4. Use of the Concentrator (a). The nurse shall verify physician 's orders for the rate of flow and route of administration of oxygen (mask, nasal cannula). 6. Oxygen warning signs must be placed on the door of the resident 's room where oxygen is in use. 8. Storage of oxygen shall be in accordance with the facility Oxygen Safety Policy. Record review of R20's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that one of 10 sampled residents (R1) was free from chemical restraints, related to not using other interventions to manage behaviors prior to using Haloperidol. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, deaf nonspeaking, mood disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2024 R1 was administered a one-time dose of Haldol injection solution 5 MG/ML on 2/8/2024 and a one-time dose of Haloperidol Lactate Injection Solution 1 mg intramuscularly one time only on 2/13/2024. Haloperidol Lactate Injection Solution inject 5 mg intramuscularly every 6 hours as needed for agitation on 2/20/2024 and Haloperidol Lactate Injection Solution inject 5 mg intramuscularly every 6 hours as needed on 6/28/2024. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews and the facility policy Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff reported an allegation of restraining one resident (R1) of 10 sampled residents. Finding include Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, dated 9/2012, revised 11/2022. D. Protect the Resident. 1. Assess the Involved Resident (s). a. Staff should report all incidents/allegations immediately to the Administrator or designee. Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, deaf, nonspeaking, mood disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of the progress notes (nursing) revealed on 2/13/2024 that R1 appears agitated at this time. Resident threw the trash can, slammed door, and yelled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were not ordered as needed (PRN) beyond 14 days, failed to document the rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for one of ten sampled residents (R) R1. Findings include: The policy related to antipsychotic drug usage was requested but the facility was unable to provide the policy prior to exit. Review of the medical records revealed that R1 was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 2/14/2025 and returned on 2/16/2024. He return from the hospital to the facility with medications orders that included the prn Haldol. The prn Haldol was entered into the electronic medical record on 2/16/2024 as indefinitely. This order would have an end date of 3/2/2024. However, on 2/26/2024, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD entered a new order for the prn Haldol with an end date of 3/10/2024. Thus, a face-to-face re-evaluation and rationale for use was required by the physician in order to continue the prn Haldol till 3/10/2024. The medical records revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide restorative services for one Resident (R1) of 10 sampled residents. Findings include: Policy related to restorative services were requested but not received by the time of exit. Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, deaf nonspeaking, mood disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of Physical Therapy PT Discharge Summary dated 2/19/2024 through 3/15/2024 revealed R1 was discharged from skilled physical therapy with recommendation for Restorative Program. R1 had restorative for ambulation on the parallel bar; range of motion (ROM) seated bilateral lower extremity times two; transfer to wheelchair; and bed mobility up in chair in the morning. R1 was discharged from skilled physical therapy with recommendation for restorative service. The facility census is 38 residents. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-07 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure evidence that a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) was serving in the position at the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for creating an ineffective infection prevention program that may contribute to the spread of COVID-19 for all residents in the facility. The census was 38 residents. Findings include: Interview on 8/7/22 at 11:25 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she is the IP for the facility. DON stated that she used to have her infection control certificate hanging on her wall prior to leaving the facility to work elsewhere for about six weeks. DON stated that she does not know where her certificate is and she reported that she has been unable to get access to another copy. DON acknowledged that she is unable to provide proof of a certificate confirming completion of specialized training as an Infection Preventionist.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-07 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to cover the current total funds in the resident trust account. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents with a trust fund account managed by the facility. The facility census was 38 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Surety Bond Continuation Certificate revealed a bond in the amount of $60,000.00 issued by the Ohio Insurance Company. Further review of the Surety Bond Continuation Certificate certifies that the Bond is continued in full force and effect until the 1st day of [DATE], subject to all covenant and conditions of said Bond. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:58 a.m. with the Business Office Manager (BOM) it was confirmed the surety bond amount for the current policy expired on [DATE]. BOM explained that when she discovered that the Bond was expired, she immediately notified the corporate office and informed them of this matter. The BOM then revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, observation, record review, and review of policy titled Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans the facility failed to develop the care plan related to caring for one resident (R) R#19) related to contractures of left hand of 23 residents sampled for care plans. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans (undated) indicated that it is the policy of the facility to promote seamless interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service, and intervention. It is the purpose to ensure that each resident is provided with individualized, goal directed care, which is reasonable, measurable, and based on resident needs. A resident's care should be the appropriate intervention and provide a means of interdisciplinary communication to ensure continuity in resident care. 1.Observation 8/6/22 at 1:10 p.m. revealed R#19 lying in the bed with left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that activities were provided to residents as scheduled. The facility census was 38 residents. Findings include: Review of the activity calendar revealed that there were activities scheduled on 8/6/22 and 8/7/22 at 10:30 a.m. Observation on 8/6/22 at 11:00 a.m., revealed 9 residents sitting in wheelchairs around the entrance of the dining room awaiting someone to arrive and perform an activity which was scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. There were no staff observed providing activities to residents. Observation on 8/7/22 at 11:00 a.m., revealed 12 residents sitting in wheelchairs around the entrance of the dining room awaiting someone to arrive and perform the religious activity which was scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. There were no staff observed providing activities to residents. Observation on 8/7/22 at 11:30 a.m., revealed 12 residents sitting in wheelchairs around the entrance of the dining room awaiting someone to arrive and perform the religious activity which was scheduled to begin at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow an Occupational Therapy (OT) Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) recommendation for range of motion (ROM) and orthotic application for two residents (R) (R#19) and (R) (R#24) reviewed for ROM and mobility. The sample size was 23 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 8/6/22 at 8:24 a.m., revealed R#19 sitting up in the bed eating breakfast using her right hand. R#19's left hand is positioned in body alignment, fingers on left hand are clinched closed into a fist. R#19 informed surveyor that no one has performed range of motion exercises on her left hand today or yesterday. Observation on 8/6/22 at 1:10 p.m. revealed R#19 lying in the bed with her left hand clinched closed. R#19 stated that no one has been in the room to perform Range of Motion exercised or apply the splint to her left hand. R#19 pointed to a blue and white hand splint on a shelf in her room and stated, there it is, they don't put it on. I don' think…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and review of the facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing the facility failed to re-evaluate the effectiveness of current fall measures and failed to put new measures in place to prevent additional falls for one Resident (R) (R#4) of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing (revised December 2007) states based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Observation on 8/6/22 at 3:11 p.m. revealed R#4 lying in bed. The bed is in the lowest position and the fall mat is not along the right side of the bed but is observed folded alongside of the wall. Record review revealed R#4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbances, restlessness and agitation and anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition. A Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain an order to receive dialysis services for one resident (R) R#29) of two residents receiving dialysis. Findings: Review of medical record for R#29 revealed diagnoses that included but not limited to bacterial infection of unspecified site, Diabetes due to underlying condition, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Physician Orders revealed orders for Levemir 100 Unit/ milliliter (ml) 35 units SQ daily, Humulin R 100Unit/ml sliding scale, and monitor dialysis access for signs of infection. However, there were no orders found for dialysis treatment. Review of care plan for R#29 dated 2/26/19 revealed problems/needs: 1. Problem: I require renal dialysis with dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. An interview was conducted on 8/5/22 at 11:41 a.m. with R#29 who confirmed that she receives dialysis services three days per week. During an interview on 8/7/22 at 10:11 a.m. with the DON it was revealed that it is her expectation that orders be obtained for any and all treatments provided to the residents of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of facility policy titled Medication Monitoring the facility failed to document the intended duration of therapy for one resident (R) (#4), that had an as needed order (PRN) for PRN antianxiety and antipsychotic medications beyond 14 days, of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Medication Monitoring, revealed that PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN. PRN orders for antipsychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for appropriateness of that medication. CMS 483.45(e)(4) regulations state that a PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-07 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R#39) of five sampled residents was offered, received, and had documentation related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include: Resident (R#39) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review revealed there is no documentation of COVID-19 vaccines or COVID-19 vaccination status. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/7/22 at 9:25 a.m. revealed she was not aware that R#39 had not received COVID-19 vaccines. DON stated that she is the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility, and she stated that she is responsible for the infection control program. DON stated that the Social Services Director (SSD) is responsible for getting the permissions from family or guardian for consent. DON stated the SSD gives her the consent forms. DON stated after she receives the consent forms, she screens the residents and then she administers the vaccine. DON confirmed that it's been almost a year and R#39 have no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,730 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $10,730 — penalty dated 2024-08-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-03 for 20 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- BRASS GA TRUST — REIT · 20.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- GOLD GA TRUST — REIT · 20.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- COPPER GA TRUST — REIT · 8.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA PCNH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/28/2026 |
| BRASS GA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 03/28/2026 |
| COPPER GA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 03/28/2026 |
| GEM BSD GA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 03/28/2026 |
| GOLD GA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 03/28/2026 |
| SILVER GA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 03/28/2026 |
| SILBERSTEIN, ARI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| CARE NETWORK HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| BICKETT, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/28/2026 |
| GRIFFIN, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| KIRSCHNER, DEVORA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| SOEHNER, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2026 |
| ELLENBOGEN, MOSS | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| KOHEN, ELIYAHU | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| SALZMAN, DAVID | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| 120 SKYLINE DR HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| 120 SKYLINE DR LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| GAMFAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| KF CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| LICHTSCHEIN FAMILY 2012 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| SCHEINER FAMILY 2012 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| SCHEINER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| OBERLANDER, ZALMEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115427. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.