No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crossroads of Flowery Branch of Journey LLC, The

4595 Cantrell Road, Flowery Branch, GA 30542 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (770) 967-2070 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (770) 967-2070 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4919 Atlanta Hwy · (770) 848-9160 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5865 Spout Springs Rd · (770) 967-1210 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5887 Spout Springs Rd Ste D402 · (678) 828-7517 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5575 Jim Crow Rd · (770) 535-8280 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5106 Spring St · (770) 967-6212

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.0%15.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.1%11.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened34.7%15.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.8%20.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.1%15.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.2%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%2.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine17.0%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.0%25.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.9%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.062.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.191.901.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 53% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.5%CMS range 30.2–53.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.3–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 5.5–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.341.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
48.5%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 104.6 residents a day — about 105% occupied, or roughly -5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.67 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.70 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-16)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-16 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to cover the total funds in the resident trust account. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents with trust fund accounts managed by the facility. The census was 93 residents.Findings included:A facility policy on surety bonds was requested but not provided.A review of the State of Georgia Department of Community Health Long-Term Care Facility Residents' Fund Bond, dated 11/1/2024, revealed a surety bond for $75,000.00.A review of the Resident Trust Fund statement for 8/1/2025 to 9/1/2025 revealed a balance of $54,268.70 on 8/1/2025, a balance of $89,735.10 on 8/21/2025, a balance of $89,765.10 on 8/29/2025, and a balance of $89,766.98 on 8/31/2025.A review of the Resident Trust Fund statement for 9/2/2025 to 9/30/2025 revealed a balance of $89,766.98 on 9/2/2025, a balance of $92,763.98 on 9/3/2025, a balance of $92,399.48 on 9/9/2025, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans that describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for six of 46 sampled residents (R) (R90, R12, R74, R57, R1 and R16).Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 3/20/2025, revealed that the comprehensive care plan will be developed within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the plan of care. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Further review revealed, under number five, The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to provide one of 46 sampled residents (R) (R1) the right to participate in the development of his person-centered plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential to deprive R1's inclusion of personal goals, choices, and preferences in the plan of care.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 3/20/2025, documented under section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines number one, The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. Further review revealed, under number four, The comprehensive care plan will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team, which includes, but is not limited to: e. The resident and the resident's representative, to the extent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, the facility failed to ensure that the advance directive status was consistently documented in the clinical record for two of 46 sampled residents (R) (R16 and R112).Findings included:A review of the facility policy titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated February 2024 revealed under Definitions, Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed: .9. Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team and staff responsible for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Baseline Care Plan, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan for three of 46 sampled residents (R) (R14, R109, and R90). The deficient practice had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet. Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Baseline Care Plan implemented on 2/1/2024, documented under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The baseline care plan will: a. Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. b. Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident, including, but not limited to: i. Initial goals based on admission orders. ii. Physician orders. iii. Dietary orders. iv. Therapy orders. v. Social services.3. A supervising nurse shall verify within 48 hours that a baseline care plan has been developed. 1. A review of R14's Physician Orders revealed an order dated 12/13/2025 for next day labs PT/INR (Prothrombin Time / International…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to follow physician orders in accordance with professional standards related to insulin, blood testing, and non-pressure related wound care for three of 46 sampled residents (R) (R1, R14, and R53). This deficient practice had the potential to create a diminished quality of care.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, revised on 2/14/2024, revealed under the section titled Policy, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Under the section titled, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, number 11 revealed, Compare medication source with MAR (medication administration record) to verify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Oxygen Administration and Medication Orders, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen therapy for one of 13 residents on oxygen and physician orders for Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) for one of one resident with a BiPAP Mask. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen therapy for residents (R) (R112 and R50). This failure had the potential to cause respiratory distress and inconsistent care for residents receiving oxygen therapy.Findings included:A review of the facility policy titled Medication Orders, revised 2/14/2024, under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, number 5, Specific Procedures for Medication Orders: c. Written Transfer Orders (sent with a resident by a hospital or other health care facility). Implement a transfer order without further validation if it is signed and dated by the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents (R) (R9) received care and services for the provision of hemodialysis in accordance with professional standards of practice, including ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. This failure had the potential to cause delays in the identification and treatment of dialysis and related complications, including fluid overload, electrolyte imbalances, and access site complications.Findings included:The facility was unable to provide a dialysis policy. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R9 revealed no communication documents to indicate that information was exchanged with the dialysis center. The record revealed multiple instances of missing or incomplete documentation related to communication between the facility and the dialysis center. A review of R9's physician orders dated 1/12/2026 documented, Location: Right upper extremity AV fistula DO NOT use the access site arm to take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of staff-to-resident abuse to facility administration and/or within two hours to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for two of three residents (Resident (R) 1 and R2) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 12. The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at continued risk of abuse.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 3/5/2024, revealed reporting of all alleged violations . shall be immediate but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made .1. Review of R1's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the with diagnoses that included but not limited to dementia, anxiety, protein-calorie malnutrition, and muscle weakness. R1 was admitted to hospice care on 07/30/24.Review of R1's Care Plan, dated 11/5/2024 and located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed a focus of . Fragile Skin: Resident has fragile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to identify and/or investigate allegations of staff-to-resident abuse for two of three residents (Resident (R) 1 and R2) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 12. The deficient practice had the potential to allow abuse to continue. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 3/5/2024, revealed, . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur . 1.Review of R1's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to dementia, anxiety, protein-calorie malnutrition, and muscle weakness. R1 was admitted to hospice care on 7/30/2024.Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/23/2025 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded to reflect a significant weight loss for two of 12 residents (Resident (R) 8 and R5) reviewed. The deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, dated 3/20/2025, revealed, . Accuracy of assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status . The physical, mental, and psychosocial condition of the resident determines the appropriate level of involvement of physicians, nurses . dietitians, and other professionals .1. Review of R8's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update care plans to reflect a significant weight loss with current intervention for two of 12 residents (Resident (R) 8 and R5) reviewed. The deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet care needs regarding nutrition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 3/20/2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality . The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment .1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify a severe weight loss, re-assess nutritional needs, and implement interventions in a timely manner to aid in the prevention of weight loss for two of 12 residents (Resident (R) 8 and R5) reviewed. R8 had a recorded weight loss of 18.65% (percent) in less than three months. R5 had a recorded weight loss of 19.57% in five months. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Weight Management Policy and Procedure revealed a weight report which reflected significant weight changes was generated monthly (by the 10th of the month) and reviewed by the dietary manager, Registered Dietician (RD), and Director of Nursing (DON). A significant weight change was defined as 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days, and 10% in 180 days. Weekly weights were completed for residents exhibiting significant weight changes.1. Review of R8's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, review of the facility's policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program, and review of the Alliant Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Annual Report, the facility failed to monitor and verify two of 29 CNAs (CNA AA and CNA FF) completed the minimum required training hours during the last review period of February 1, 2023 - January 31, 2024. The facility census was 87 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program dated February 1, 2022, under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guideline revealed, 2. Each nurse aide shall be provided at least 12 hours of in-service training annually, based on his/her employment date, not calendar year. (b). It is the responsibility of the employee to attend/complete mandatory in-service training to maintain employment with the facility. Review of the Alliant Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Annual Report, dated 7/5/2024 for review period 2/1/2023 - 1/31/2024 revealed, a staff development review was conducted on 7/5/2024. Under the section titled, Problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, review of resident council minutes, and review of the facility's policy's titled Resident Council Meeting policy, the facility failed to assure that a follow-up was completed and communicate its decisions related to resident concerns and recommendation voiced during resident council meetings. This deficient practice had the potential to have an adverse effect on any resident who voiced a concern and/or recommendation. The facility census was 87 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council Meetings, dated 2/2/2022, under the section titled Policy revealed, This facility supports the rights of residents to organize and participate in residents' groups, including a Resident Council. This policy provides guidance to promoting structure, order, and productivity in these group meetings. Under the section titled Policy and Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, 5. The Activity Director shall be designated if approved by the group, to serve as a liaison between the group and facilities administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance Inspection, the facility failed to maintain the facility in a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment as evidenced by six of 56 resident rooms with furniture and/or packaged terminal air conditioners (PTACs) in disrepair. Specifically, rooms A6-2, B10-1, C18-2 had dressers with missing drawers and/or knobs and rooms C13, C15, C18, and C19 had PTACs that leaked water onto the floors. This deficiency had to potential to diminish the quality of life for the residents in rooms with dilapidated furniture and create a safety hazard for residents in rooms with leaking PTAC units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance Inspection, dated 8/1/2022, under the section titled, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, 1. The Director of Maintenance Services will perform routine inspections of the physical plant using a Maintenance Checklist. 3. All opportunities will be corrected immediately by maintenance personnel. 1. Observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices were maintained to prevent the potential for infections and cross contamination. Specifically, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene after passing out each meal tray for residents on one of three halls (Hall A) that was observed during lunch. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hand Hygiene, dated February 1, 2022, under the section titled Policy revealed, All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table. 3. Alcohol based hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Documentation in Medical Record, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation was completed regarding a change of condition for one resident (R) (R1) out of six sampled residents reviewed for notification of change. Findings Include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Documentation in Medical Record under Policy revealed, Each resident's medical record shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation. Under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, 1. Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy. 2. Documentation shall be completed at the time of service, but no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff entering the kitchen wore a hairnet, failed to ensure food items were labeled, dated, and discard after Best Use By date, and failed to ensure dietary staff properly used the three-compartment sink to prevent food borne illness. All 92 residents were receiving an oral diet. Findings include: 1. Review of facility policy titled Food Safety Requirements dated 2/1/22, revealed under 'Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines' number 7. Staff shall adhere to safe hygienic practices to prevent contamination of foods from hands or physical objects. Hairnets should be worn. Observation on 11/4/22 at 8:32 a.m. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) KK entered the kitchen and was standing in the food preparation area without wearing a hairnet. Interview on 11/4/22 at 8:32 a.m. with CNA KK, confirmed that she was in the food preparation area and was not wearing a hair net. She stated that she needed dietary staff assistance and went into the food preparation area to find someone. The CNA revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor garbage and refuse area was maintained in a sanitary manner, evidenced by overflowing garbage from the dumpster and the area around the dumpster was clean and free of debris. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Observation on 11/5/22 at 9:15 a.m. during tour of the dumpster area, revealed the dumpster was full, and the top lid was not able to be closed, exposing multiple garbage bags. Continued observation revealed the wooded area behind the dumpster had multiple trash items on the ground. Interview on 11/5/22 at 9:15 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed that the dumpster is scheduled for trash pick-up today. Interview on 11/5/22 at 9:18 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD) revealed that he will call the dumpster company to ensure they get trash picked-up today. Observation on 11/6/22 at 9:10 a.m. of the dumpster area revealed dumpster continued to be full; however top lid was closed. Further observation revealed overflow garbage was observed to be in two large gray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment in the kitchen was in safe working order, evidenced by the walk-in freezer and the reach-in refrigerator observed with ice build-up on the air fans. The facility census was 92 residents. Findings include: Observation on 11/4/22 at 8:52 a.m. during initial tour of the kitchen, revealed in the walk-in freezer, a three-gallon container of strawberry ice cream and a three-gallon container of chocolate ice cream placed under the air condenser. There was ice build-up of approximately two inches thick covering the entire lid of both containers of ice cream. Continued observation revealed a prepared pie in plastic packaging sitting on the top lid of the strawberry ice cream covered with ice and not able to be dislodged from the container of ice cream. On the top lid of the chocolate ice cream container was a square foiled wrapped food item that was not able to be dislodged to view label/date. Further observation revealed a shallow steam table pan under the air condenser and under the piping to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-06 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain and discontinue midline intravenous (IV) sites for two residents (R) (R#1 and R#51) reviewed of six residents with a midline IV site. Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record for R#1 revealed an admission date of 7/6/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, sepsis, and acute kidney failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R#1 had a Brief Interview of Mental (BIMS) score of six out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section O revealed the resident received IV medications while a resident in the facility. Review of the November 2022 Physician Orders (PO) revealed an order dated 10/21/22 for midline placement for IV hydration and to discontinue midline one time only for three days dated 10/26/22. There were no orders for the care or maintenance of the IV site. Observations on 11/4/22 at 10:59 a.m., 11/5/22 at 9:00 a.m., and 11/6/22 at 10:00 a.m. revealed R#1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-06 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had knowledge of proper reheat procedures for resident food items brought in from outside to prevent food borne illness. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors dated 2/1/22, revealed no procedure for reheating food items to ensure safe food consumption. Facility later provided a policy titled Food Safety Requirements which is a dietary policy. The policy does have section for reheating which states reheating food that is cooked and cooled must be reheated so that all parts of the food reach an internal temperature of 165F. Interview on 11/6/22 at 10:28 a.m. with License Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager (UM) revealed that nursing staff had not been made aware of how to properly reheat resident food items brought in by family until yesterday. The Unit Manager stated she was given a sheet with temperatures for resident food but when asked what the reheat temperature for food items brought in from outside, the UM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, the facility failed to ensure it implemented an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) to include antibiotic use protocols, and a system to monitor antibiotic use protocols for three of three months reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of policy titled Infection Preventionist dated 2/1/22 revealed under 'Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines' number 4. Responsibilities of the Infection Preventionist include but are not limited to: d. Oversight of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Review of policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 2/1/22 revealed policy is the facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Interview on 11/6/22 at 10:40 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment related to disrepair of resident rooms and bathrooms including floors, walls, doors, and heat/air units for 6 of 92 resident rooms. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Preventative Maintenance Program dated 2/1/22 which documented the Maintenance Director shall assess all aspects of the physical plant to determine if preventative maintenance is required. Observation and interview on 11/4/22 at 10:01 a.m. with the resident in room C-8-2 revealed the heating and air unit in his room does not provide heat. The unit was set on heat and low fan with only cool air blowing. Observation of room A-17-2 on 11/4/22 at 10:07 a.m. revealed base board pulling away from a large portion of one wall in the bathroom, and a tile with a large, chipped piece near the bathroom door. Observation of A-18-2 on 11/4/22 at 10:23 a.m. revealed moulding up wall and near floor next to bathroom door pulling away from wall and base board near floor near second closet door…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one resident (R) (R#345) for right subclavian dialysis access site. In addition, the facility failed to follow the care plan for fluid restriction for R#345. The sample size was 37 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2/1/22, revealed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident's rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Review of the clinical record for R#345 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including renal insufficiency, renal failure, and end stage renal disease (ESRD). Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, policy review, and Rule 410-10-.02 Standards of Practice for Licensed Practical Nurses, the facility failed to ensure that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) NN followed the policy and procedure during medication administration. Specifically, LPN NN prepared medications for R#42, who was not in the facility, and did not destroy narcotics and medications appropriately. The sample size was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of Review of the Georgia Rule 410-10-.02 - Standards of Practice for Licensed Practical Nurses revealed that: (1) The practice of licensed practical nursing means the provision of care for compensation, under the supervision of a physician practicing medicine, a dentist practicing dentistry, a podiatrist practicing podiatry, or a registered nurse practicing nursing in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Such care shall relate to the promotion of health, the prevention of illness and injury, and the restoration and maintenance of physical and mental health through acts authorized by the board, which shall include,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide restorative services as recommended by occupational and physical therapy for one resident (R)(#31) and related to splint use and contracture management for one resident, R#60, of 37 samples residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Program dated 2/1/22 revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level. Number 7. Residents may receive restorative nursing services upon admission when not a candidate for specialized rehabilitation services, when restorative needs arise during the course of a longer-term stay, in conjunction with specialized rehabilitation therapy, or upon discharge from therapy. 1. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R#31 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was free from dust build up, failed to deliver oxygen at the flow rate ordered by physician, and failed to ensure oxygen nasal cannulas were properly stored when not in use for four residents (R) (R#14, R#25, R#10 and R#15) receiving respiratory care. The sample size was 37. Findings include: Review of policy titled Oxygen Concentrator effective date 2/1/22, revealed the purpose of the policy is to establish responsibility for the care and use of oxygen concentrators. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines number 4. Use of Concentrator: A. the nurse shall verify physician's orders for the rate of flow and route of administration of oxygen (mask, nasal cannula, etc.). L. keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Number 5. Care of the Concentrator: A. Follow manufacturer recommendations for the frequency of cleaning filters and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the right subclavian permcath site before and after dialysis and failed to adhere to the ordered fluid restriction for one resident (R) (R#345) reviewed for dialysis services. Review of the facilities Resident Census and Conditions of Residents (CMS Form 672) dated 11/4/22 revealed one resident was receiving dialysis services. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Hemodialysis dated 2/1/22, revealed the policy is to provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis. Compliance Guidelines number 4. The licensed nurse will communicate to the dialysis facility via telephonic communication or written format, such as a dialysis communication form or other form, that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications including antianxiety medications were not ordered as needed (PRN) for more than 14 days unless clinically indicated for one of five residents (R) (R#32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings includes: Review of the policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication dated 2/1/22, revealed the policy statement as residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). 'Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines' number 9. PRN orders for all psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration (i.e., 14 days). a. If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JOURNEY HEALTHCARE — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Calhoun Crossing Of Journey LLCCalhoun, GA 1 of 5Clifton HeightsLouisville, KY 1 of 5Fairburn Heights Of Journey LLCFairburn, GA 1 of 5Jasper Point Of Journey LLCJasper, GA 1 of 5Jesup Ridge of Journey LLCJesup, GA 1 of 5Kirtland Woods Of JourneyKirtland, OH 1 of 5Morgantown Heights Of JourneyMorgantown, WV 1 of 5Murray Woods Of Journey LLCChatsworth, GA 1 of 5Reserve at Appling of Journey LLC, TheAppling, GA 1 of 5Stanford CrossingStanford, KY 1 of 5Stone Mountain Run Of Journey LLCStone Mountain, GA 1 of 5Thomasville Vistas of Journey LLCThomasville, GA 1 of 5Tucker Park Crossing of Journey LLCTucker, GA 2 of 5Crossings At East Lake Of Journey Llc, TheDecatur, GA 2 of 5Fort Valley Crossing of Journey LLCFort Valley, GA 2 of 5Frankfort TrailsFrankfort, KY 2 of 5Glasgow Hills Of JourneyGlasgow, WV 2 of 5Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, TheFort Gaines, GA 2 of 5Warrenton Woods of Journey LLCWarrenton, GA 2 of 5Woods at Lumber City of Journey LLC, TheLumber City, GA 3 of 5Bainbridge Landing of Journey LLCBainbridge, GA 3 of 5Cartersville Crossing Of Journey LLCCartersville, GA 3 of 5Chardon WoodsChardon, OH 3 of 5Dublin Trails Of Journey LLCDublin, GA 3 of 5LaGrange Trails of Journey LLCLagrange, GA 3 of 5Riverside Valley Of JourneySaint Albans, WV 3 of 5Twin City Trails of Journey LLCTwin City, GA 3 of 5Vanceburg HillsVanceburg, KY 4 of 5Green River TrailsGreensburg, KY 4 of 5Roberta Trails of Journey LLCRoberta, GANot rated (Special Focus)Lyndon Crossing, LLCLouisville, KY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JOURNEY OX OF GA LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
3 BEES HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
AJOJ HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
BEES FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
BLUE OCEAN TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
JOURNEY OX GA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
SHASAM FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
SHASAM HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
MCGUINNESS, BERNARDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
JOURNEY OX GA MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BILBO, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2024
CONRAD, CAMERONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
FRINKS, TERENCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
JOHNSON, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
JONES, ANTONIOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/18/2024
LOONEY, MICAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
NG, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
OMARA, JODYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
PARKER, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
SILLINGS, NIKKIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
TRAMMELL, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
SUMMIT FLOWERY BRANCH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$452K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 13%Other / private 19%

This home reported $452K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,449per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$260per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115327. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next