Envive Of Anderson

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 52.7 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for a resident admitted with pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injury. (Resident 56) Findings include:Resident 56's clinical record was reviewed on 4/9/26 at 11:24 a.m. The resident was admitted [DATE]. A 4/1/26 admission assessment indicated the resident had a wound on his coccyx (tailbone). A risk for impaired skin integrity baseline care plan outline prompt was included in the assessment. Intervention options included diet as ordered, observe skin with daily cares, and notify the nurse of any new or worsening areas, and treatments as ordered. A current resident care plan, initiated 4/2/26, indicated the following: At risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility, self-care deficit. Goal: Resident will have no further skin breakdown through next review. Interventions included encourage good nutrition and hydration, keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were in place and interventions developed and implemented to promote healing of a pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 56)Findings include:Resident 56's clinical record was reviewed on 4/9/26 at 11:24 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included stage III chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm).A 4/1/26 Braden Scale assessment indicated the resident was at moderate risk for pressure injury formation. A 4/1/26 nursing admission evaluation indicated the resident presented to the facility with a stage 2 pressure ulcer to his coccyx (tailbone area). A 4/1/26 nurse's note indicated the resident arrived to the facility with a stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer) on his coccyx. The area was cleansed with wound cleanser…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies related to implementing interventions to promote healing of pressure injuries.Findings include:Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies (2567), for the facility's last annual recertification and licensure survey, completed on July 25, 2025, indicated the facility had deficiencies related to failure to obtain wound assessments, monitoring, and treatments in a manner to promote the healing of a pressure injury.During an interview, on 4/10/26 at 12:02 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met monthly and reviewed areas of concerns, areas showing trends, and/or areas with an increase in occurrence. Previous annual survey citations are reviewed through the time frame listed on the Plan of Correction (POC), usually for six months. If the audits and/or evaluations met the required threshold, those areas were considered corrected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during a wound dressing change observation for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 9)Findings include:Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/26 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, unspecified bipolar disorder, and stage 4 (full-thickness wound, extending through deep tissue to expose muscle, tendon, ligament, or bone) pressure injury of the sacrum (tailbone area).Current orders indicated to cleanse the sacrum pressure injury with an external wound cleanser, apply calcium alginate (a wound dressing) to the wound bed. Apply zinc paste (a barrier cream) around the wound bed and cover with a bordered silicone dressing. Change once daily and as needed (3/17/26) and required the use of EBP related to the presence of a wound and to reduce the risk of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (10/23/25).A 10/17/25, pressure injury care plan indicated Resident 9 had a stage 4 pressure injury. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary employees where competent in dishwasher sanitation testing. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 57 of 57 residents who consumed meals prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include:During an observation of dishwasher operations in the facility kitchen on 7/24/25 at 8:48 a.m. the following was observed:The Dietary Manager indicated the dishwasher was a low temp machine, which used sanitizer in its final rinse. The sanitizer was a chlorine-based sanitizer. The dish machine that was in operation washing the breakfast dishes, plates, bowls, cups, glasses etc. The Dietary Manager placed a test strip inside the dish machine for testing. He indicated the test strip could be used to test the sanitizer level both internally and externally in the water well located on the outside of the dishwasher. The test strips used had red writing and a red band across the edges. They were not the traditional all white dip stick style. The Dietary Manager indicated, using the test strips with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bed hold policy and transfer/discharge notifications to the resident/representative for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 36 and 61)B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notification of hospitalization to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 5 residents reviewed of hospitalization. (Residents 20 and 61) Findings include:A1. Resident 61's clinical record was reviewed on 7/22/25 at 2:36 p.m. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and malignant neoplasm of the right breast. A 6/23/25 progress note indicated the resident was non-responsive and transported to the local hospital. A 6/24/25 progress note indicated the resident was hospitalized for a change in level of consciousness. A 7/14/25 progress note indicated the resident remained hospitalized . The clinical record lacked information indicating the resident or the representative received a copy of the transfer/discharge form or the bed hold policy. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding placement of heel boots for a resident with current skin conditions for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 36) Finding includes: During an observation, on 7/21/25 at 1:10 p.m., Resident 36 was lying in bed with bare feet. Resident 36 indicated she had a wound on her right ankle and foot. A dressing was noted to her right lateral ankle and foot. The resident's right ankle and foot was positioned with the dressing side facing down, flat on the bed. The resident was not wearing heel boots.On 7/22/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 36 was lying in bed with bare feet. A dressing was noted to her right lateral ankle and foot. The resident's right ankle and foot was positioned with the dressing side facing down, flat on the bed. The resident was not wearing heel boots.Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 9:10 a.m. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and atherosclerotic heart disease of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound assessments/monitoring and wound treatments in a manner to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 1)Finding includes:Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound assessments/monitoring and wound treatments in a manner to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 1)Finding includes:During an interview on 7/21/25 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 1 was in her bed on a low air loss mattress and turned slightly to her right side. She indicated she had a wound on her buttock that was present on admission. She did not feel well and was uncertain why. The resident was dependent on staff for repositioning. Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed on 7/22/225 at 3:41 p.m. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, weakness, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage IV (Full-thickness skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the opportunity to go outside per their preference, weather permitting, for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 17 of 59 resident who were unable to go outside with out supervision. Findings include: 1. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 5/19/25 at 10:07 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, overactive bladder, anemia, and depression. The most current admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/19/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident identified going outside to get fresh air when the weather was good as being very important to them. During an interview on 5/19/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident B indicated she was unable to go outside without someone taking her. She liked going outside if the weather is nice and would go…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were received from pharmacy in accordance with policy to ensure the safe handling of narcotics. Findings include: Review of a facility reportable, dated 11/25/24, indicated on 11/24/24, LPN 1 received medications from the pharmacy and did not secure a pill card of tramadol (opiod analgesic) immediately or properly. This deficient practice resulted in the 30 pill card becoming missing. Review of a written statement by LPN 1, provided by the facility, indicated on 11/24/24 at approximately 8:30 p.m., medications from the pharmacy were delivered to the facility. LPN 1 placed the 30 pill card of Tramadol (opiod analgesic) in the nurses' station, unsupervised. After checking the number of medications against the medications on the list, LPN 1 became distracted and placed the card of tramadol on the back of the desk in the nurses' station. As he continued with task throughout the shift, LPN 1 failed to realize the Tramadol had not been properly secured in the locked narcotic drawer of the medication cart. LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN