Envive Of Lawrenceburg

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 59.8 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance to prevent an avoidable accident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents hazards. This deficient practice resulted in the resident acquiring right medial and right posterior orbital fractures. (Resident D) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 9/22/2025 at 3:15 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/3/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, asthma, and respiratory failure. The Resident required maximal assistance to transferring from lying to sitting and sitting to standing.The At Risk for Falls Care Plan, dated 8/27/25 and revised on 9/8/25, indicated the resident will be free of falls. The interventions included, but were not limited to, dated 8/27/25, anticipate and meet the resident's needs; and, dated 9/6/25, resident's room closer to nurses station for closer monitoring.The Physical Therapy Progress Report, dated 8/23/25, indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident, that required a full body mechanical lift, safely using the appropriate lift resulting in a fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C) Findings include: On 8/9/23 at 11:08 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated on 7/27/23 Resident C was being assisted into bed with a lift. The resident yelled out in pain and was sent out to the emergency room (ER). The resident had a fractured left fibula and a follow up appointment with Orthopedics. During an observation and interview on 8/9/23 at 1:57 p.m., Resident C was lying in her bed, her left leg was wrapped and elevated on a pillow. She indicated she required a full body mechanical lift for transfers. On 7/27/23, the day of the incident, she was in the wheelchair for a long time and had asked to be put to bed. The full body mechanical lift had quit working. The staff couldn't find a cord to charge it, so they use a standing aid transfer system…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders related to hold parameters for cardiac medications for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents 37 and 63)Findings include:1. Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed on 02/18/2026 at 2:24 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/2025, indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Cancer and Adverse Effects of Antineoplastic (agents, drugs, or therapies that inhibit or prevent the development maturation, or spread of caner/tumor cells) and Immunosuppressive Drugs. The resident's current physician's orders included an open-ended order, with a start date of 12/02/2025, for midodrine (a medication used to treat low blood pressure) 5 mg (milligrams) with meals for hypotension. The medication was to be held if the resident's Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP; the top number) was greater than 120. The December 2025, January 2026, and February 2026 Electronic Medication Administration Records (EMAR) indicated the medication was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer or discharge documentation was provided for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. (Residents 66 and 68)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 68 was reviewed on 02/19/2026 at 11:00 A.M. A Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, accepted on 11/17/2025, indicated the resident admitted to the facility from a short-term hospital stay on 11/03/2025 for care after experiencing a stroke. A Social Services Note, dated 11/21/2025 at 3:49 P.M., indicated the resident was accepted at a different long term care facility. The receiving facility would pick her up on 11/24/2025. The resident's census page in her Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated she was discharged from the facility on 11/24/2025. During an interview, on 02/20/2026 at 1:34 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 indicated when a resident was discharged from the facility, staff were to complete a discharge summary in the computer that recapped the resident's stay and provided information about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold for a resident sent to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident 66)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 66 was reviewed on 02/19/2026 at 10:42 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/13/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, heart failure (a chronic progressive condition where the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for oxygen and nutrients). A Progress Note, dated 11/14/2025 at 7:00 P.M., indicated the resident's family member had requested the resident be sent to the emergency room. The resident was sent to the local hospital per the request. A Progress Note, dated 11/14/2025 at 10:00 P.M., indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital for heart failure.The clinical record lacked the resident receiving a bed hold policy with the discharged . During an interview, on 02/20/2026 1:39 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated when a resident went to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders related to daily weights for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Hydration Status. (Resident 52)Finding included:The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 02/19/2026 at 11:21 A.M. An admission MDS assessment, dated 01/12/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnosis included but was not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalances, systemic illness, or organ failure).A physician's order, dated 01/31/2026 through 02/11/2026, indicated the resident was to be weighed daily in the morning for fluid retention. An open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 02/12/2026, indicated the resident was to be weighed daily for fluid retention. The Vitals Record and February 2026 EMAR lacked documented weights for the resident for the following dates: 02/02/2026 through 02/09/2026; 02/08/2026, 02/12/2026, 02/13/2026, 02/15/2026, 02/16/2026, 02/18/2026, and 02/19/2026. During an interview, on 02/20/2026 at 10:11 A.M., QMA 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 3 medication rooms reviewed. (South Medication Cart on the third floor and third floor Medication Room) Findings include: 1. On 02/20/2026 at 9:39 A.M., the South Medication Cart on the third floor was observed with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 and contained the following: - A small round white pill was lying loose in the bottom of the second drawer along with dust and paper debris,- A small round white pill was lying loose in the bottom of the third drawer along with dust and several pieces of paper debris. During an interview at the time of the observation, QMA 2 indicated she was unaware of what the pills were or who they belonged to. There shouldn't be any loose pills in the medication cart. The current Medication Labeling and Storage policy, dated 8/2024, was provided by Corporate Support Staff (CSS) 5 on 02/20/2026 at 2:04 P.M. The policy indicated, .Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 63)Findings include:During an observation, on 02/19/2026 at 10:58 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse 3 gathered supplies from a treatment cart and entered Resident 63's room. She sanitized her hands and donned gloves. She then provided wound treatment care to the resident. There was no gown donned prior to or during the wound treatment. There was no indication outside or inside the resident room that they were on EBP. The clinical record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 02/19/2026 at 11:49 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/19/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to, anemia, hypertension, renal insufficiency, diabetes, anxiety, depression, cirrhosis of liver, and liver transplant status. A Wound Nurse Practitioner Report, dated 02/03/2026, indicated the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate equipment to allow residents to call for assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from the residents bedside for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident C) Findings include:During an interview, on 9/22/2025 at 9:08 A.M., Resident C indicated he had no call light available. When Resident C moved into his room Maintenance came in, and he told the resident there was no spot to hook a call light up. He had been in the room for a few months, and had never received a call light. The facility provided a bell to ring, but he was unable to find it anymore. When he did have access to the bell staff were never able to hear it no matter how much he rang because he was located at the last room at the end of the hallway. Usually if he needed someone he would go into the bathroom and use the call light in there. There was one night he was unable to get out of bed, and needed to vomit and he had to yell out for help because he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functional, sanitary and comfortable homelike environment related to dripping and pooling water. This deficent practice had the potiential to affect 49 of 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The first-floor dining room was observed on 06/19/25 at 8:32 A.M. The door was left open to the first-floor main hallway. The exterior wall had a large window, with a heating and air conditioning unit below the window in the center of the wall. Above the window unit on the ceiling, an area, approximately four feet long and three feet wide, was covered with a black spotted substance with brown staining all around the center, and visible moisture. A brown liquid substance dripped in three separate spots on the floor leaving half dollar sized brown stains on the floor. The stained ceiling was concaved outward, bowing down towards the floor. During an interview, on 06/19/25 at 11:03 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 1 indicated she had noticed the spot on the ceiling in April or May but didn't go in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related to labeling medications, cleanliness of medication carts, loose pills, discontinued medications, and expired medications for 2 of 3 Medication Carts reviewed (South Medication Cart on the third floor, North Medication Cart on the second floor) and 1 of 2 Medication Storage areas reviewed (First floor). Findings include: 1. The South Mediation Cart on the third floor was observed on 03/17/25 at 9:59 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 and contained the following: - An Albuterol inhaler, prescribed on 09/19/24, for Resident 12 , with no open date, - A small side drawer containing bottled liquid medications with a shiny film covering the bottom of the drawer, - One medium round white loose pill, - One small oval white loose pill, and The following cards of discontinued medications: - Cephalexin, an antibiotic, 500 milligrams (mg), 3 pills left, for Resident 13, - Guaifenesin, an expectorant, 600 mg, 3 pills left, for Resident 37, - Cefdinir, an antibiotic, 300 mg,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the manufacturer's guidelines related to insulin pen usage for 1 of 5 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident 12) Findings include: During an interview and observation with RN 7, on 03/12/25 at 11:13 A.M., medication administration was observed. The nurse prepared insulin for Resident 12 using an insulin pen. RN 7 indicated the resident was to receive 4 units of Aspart/Novolog insulin scheduled with meals and 6 units per the sliding scale, for a total of 10 units. The nurse removed the insulin pen from the medication cart, checked the label, removed the pen cap, cleaned the end of the pen with an alcohol wipe, applied the needle, and removed the cap of the needle. She turned the pen dose selector to two units, primed the pen holding the pen tip facing the floor, squirted out the two units of insulin, turned the pen dose selector to 10 units, donned gloves, and went into the resident's room. The nurse administered the insulin into the resident's abdomen. During an interview with RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-18 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN