Envive Of Berne

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 44.9 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed for therapeutic diets. This had the potential to affect 6 residents that were on puree diets. (Resident 2, Resident 5, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 12, Resident 33)Findings include: An observation, on 08/10/25 at 10:59 AM, [NAME] 4 began puree preparation. In an interview, on 08/10/25 at 10:59 AM, [NAME] 4 indicated there was no recipe book for purees and was told just to add water and bread. She indicated she would eyeball consistency and would just open the lid of the puree to see how thick or thin it was. [NAME] 4 indicated she did not know how the nutritional value was maintained since she had just started with the facility. [NAME] 4 indicated she did not know the fork or spoon method for testing appropriate puree thickness. In an interview, on 08/10/25 at 10:59 AM, the Dietary Manager indicated there was no testing method for puree diets. There was a recipe book, however the cooks typically knew what to add, the menu was a 4 week rotation so the cooks knew how to prepare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sanitization was completed of the ice machine/chest. This had the potential to affect 28 residents that receive ice from facility. Finding include: Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was maintained. 28 of 42 residents residing in the facility received ice from the ice machine.During an observation of the ice machine located in the main dining room, on 08/10/25 at 10:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), the ice machine lid was opened, there were black and orange substances on the rubber surface. Ice cubes were located below. The DON indicated this was the only ice machine in the building and they would shut down the machine. In an interview, on 8/10/25 at 10:59 AM, the Dietary Manager indicated maintenance was responsible for the ice machine. Dietary staff did not clean or have anything to do with the ice machine. In an interview, on 08/10/25 at 11:52 AM, the DON indicated staff took all residents' mugs, emptied them and filled them with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians orders for tube feeding for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident 43). Findings include:During an observation, on August 11, 2025 at 11:24 AM, Resident 43 was observed to be alone in his room and sitting in his wheel chair to the left of the bed. An enteral pole was observed to be located to the right of the bed and the enteral feeding pump was turned off.During an observation, on August 11, 2025 at 1:03 PM, Resident 43 was observed to be alone in is room and sitting in his wheel chair to the left side of the bed in the same position as at 11:24 AM. An enteral feeding pole was observed to be located to the right of the bed in the same position as observed at 11:24 AM and the enteral pump was turned off. In an interview, on August 11, 2025 at 1:11 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 8 indicated she was unsure why Resident 43's enteral feeding pump was turned off. LPN 8 indicated she is aware that there is a hold feeding order for activities. LPN 8 indicated Resident 43 was by himself in his room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. 38 of 39 residents who riside in the facility eat food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 09/30/24 at 09:22 AM, [NAME] 2 pulled the grease traps under the first set of burners. There were 2 layers of foil present. On the top layer of foil was burnt noodles, carrots, and other unidentifiable debris as well as other odd, shaped discolorations on top of each other. The oven under the first set of burners did not close fully. The walk in cooler had debris of various sizes and substance; cardboard, plastic, and paper were identified under the racks. There was a pipe coming from the top of the walk in freezer wrapped in black tape, at an elbow of the pipe was a square plastic container with green markings of 1 cup, 2 cups, 3 cups, and 4 cups underneath. There was liquid inside the container. The liquid was clear and frozen. There was a frozen substance coming out the left side of the container. The walk in freezer did not have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a nurse was appointed as charge nurse each shift. 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings include: In an observation on 11/12/23 at 11:04AM, a staffing sheet dated 11/10/23 was posted with an indicated census of 41. There was no indication the charge nurse was listed on the posting. There was no place on posting for a charge nurse to be indicated for any shift. In an interview, on 11/12/23 at 11:19AM, RN 8 (Registered Nurse) indicated there was no charge nurse. RN 8 indicated neither he nor the other nurse on duty were in charge, but both were RNs and equally trained. RN 8 indicated he was fairly sure the census posted on Friday, dated11/10/23 was still correct. In an interview on 11/12/23 at 11:24AM, RN 9 indicated she and the other RN on duty were of equal rank and neither were in charge. She indicated the DON (Director of Nursing) was notified and would be in within an hour. During an observation on 11/12/23 at 11:28AM, a staffing sheet was observed posted without a census indicated. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a consistently functioning call light system for 2 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident B and Resident C). Findings include: 1) During an interview and observation with Resident B, on 10/19/23 at 11:16 AM, she indicated that she waited long periods of time for her light to be answered and at times questioned if her call light worked at all. Resident B pushed her call light as requested. RN 1 (Registered Nurse) came into the room to administer noon medications approximately 10 minutes later. RN 1 indicated Resident B's call light was not on. The RN attempted to activate the call light. The RN indicated there was on as there was no way to tell if the call light was on. RN 1 indicated the call light system worked in waves with a transmitter located at the nurse's station. RN 1 explained when a resident pushes the light there was no audible or visual indication inside or directly outside of the resident room. The system required someone to be at the desk to see where the signal was coming from. RN 1 went to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN