Envive Of River City
909 North First Ave, Evansville, IN 47710 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 71 certified beds · (812) 423-6214 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.0% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 40.5% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.4% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.7% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.2% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.9% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.5% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 17.6% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent standard survey results and plan of correction were available to view. Finding includes:On 5/14/26 at 12:15 p.m., a binder containing previous survey results was observed in the front lobby of the facility. The binder did not contain any results for recent surveys conducted by the Indiana Department of Health in 2026 other than a survey conducted by Life Safety Code.On 5/15/26 at 8:40 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated the facility did not have a specific policy for survey results being available, they followed the state board of health regulations.410 IAC (Indiana Administrative Code) 3.1-3(b)(1)
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents who resided in the facility for 3 of 3 units observed and 2 of 2 dining rooms. Baseboards, walls, door trim on resident rooms were marred or had chipped paint, floors had debris built up. (100 unit, 200 unit, 300 unit, 100 unit dining room, 200 unit dining room). Findings include: On 5/14/26 at 8:45 am the following was observed throughout the facility on all units: Walls on the unit hallways were marred and/or soiled.Baseboards on units were marred and/or soiled.Door trim around resident rooms were marred or had chipped paint.Floors on the hallways and nurses stations had debris build up in corners, around and under all heating/cooling units. The floors in the 100 and 200 dining rooms had debris build up around baseboards and in corners, on the floor under the wall mounted television on the 200 unit. The same was observed on 5/15/26 during the survey. On 5/16/26 at 9:17 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) provided the current policy on homelike environment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent (a process in which patients are given important information, including possible risks and benefits, about a medical procedure or treatment) prior to the administration of medication and a lab test. The facility administered psychotropic medications without informed consent (Resident 21, Resident 3, Resident 5, and Resident 1) and completed a serum drug screen without informed consent (Resident 21 and Resident 3).Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/4/26 at 2:03 P.M., Resident 21 indicated that the facility gave him a drug test without his consent. They told him the blood draw was to check on the status of his diabetes. On 1/5/26 at 2:42 P.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, acquired absence of left leg above knee, osteoarthritis, and polyneuropathy. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/7/25, indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity, respect, and freedom from discrimination. (Resident 21 and Resident 3) The provider decreased pain medication dosages after Resident 21 and Resident 3 tested positive for marijuana.Findings include:1. During an interview on 1/4/26 at 2:03 P.M., Resident 21 indicated that the facility gave him a drug test without his consent. They told him the blood draw was to check on the status of his diabetes. He tested positive for marijuana and as a result the facility decreased his pain medication. He indicated he was not getting relief for his pain anymore. His pain was due to his leg amputation and hip pain from sitting in a wheelchair all the time. On 1/5/26 at 2:42 P.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, acquired absence of left leg above knee, osteoarthritis, and polyneuropathy. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/7/25, indicated that Resident 21 had no cognitive impairment, was independent in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were documented and resolved for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident 8)Finding includes:On 1/4/26 at 11:04 A.M., Resident 8's family member indicated Resident 8's cell phone was missing. It was reported to the facility, it had not been found, and he had not had any follow up from the facility. On 1/5/26 at 2:25 P.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident 8 had severe cognitive impairment and required setup assistance for eating and substantial to maximal assistance (staff does more than half the effort) for transferring. A care conference was completed on 10/23/25 with the resident's family in attendance. Care conferences notes indicated that the resident's phone with the pink case was missing and that the facility was looking for it. A Social Service note, dated 10/23/25 at 11:46 A.M., indicated that a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist medication recommendations were reviewed and responded to in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 5 and Resident 21)Findings include:1. On 1/5/26 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/15/25, indicated Resident 5 was moderately cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff (staff does all of the work) for toileting and bathing, and received antianxiety and antidepressant medication during the 7-day lookback period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: buspirone HCl (an antianxiety medication) oral tablet 15 mg (milligrams) - Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for anxiety take with 10 mg tab; Start date 3/8/25 desvenlafaxine succinate (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and misappropriation of property were reported to the State Survey Agency or in accordance with State law for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident 33 and Resident 3)Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/4/26 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 33 indicated staff were rough with her when incontinence care was provided, they were mumbling hateful words to her, and she had to request pain medication after she received care. On 1/4/26 at 2:38 P.M., Resident 33 indicated she considered the incident with staff to be rudeness, roughness, and abuse. Administration was immediately notified of alleged abuse. On 1/5/26 at 8:43 A.M., Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/2/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient supporting documentation to meet criteria was obtained prior to giving a diagnosis of schizophrenia for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for a new schizophrenia diagnosis. (Resident 5) Finding includes:On 1/5/26 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia, added on 4/18/25 when Resident 5 was [AGE] years old. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/15/25, indicated Resident 5 was moderately cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff (staff does all of the work) for toileting and bathing, and received an antipsychotic medication during the 7-day lookback period.Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 15 mg (milligrams) Give 15 mg by mouth at bedtime related to mental disorder; Start date 3/15/25Zyprexa oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for assistance with daily living (ADL) tasks were provided showers or baths for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for bathing care. (Resident 33)Finding includes:During an interview on 1/4/25 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 33 indicated she had not received a shower since admission to the facility. Resident 33's hair was disheveled and had a strong pungent odor prevalent when opening the resident's room door. On 1/5/26 at 8:43 A.M., Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type two diabetes mellitus. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/2/26, indicated Resident 33 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff (staff does all of the work) for toileting and bathing. A Point Of Care (a Certified Nurse Aide charting system) task labeled ADL - Bathing indicated Resident 33's bathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for surgical wounds. The surgical wound was not thoroughly assessed, and a wound vac was not changed according to the physician's orders. (Resident 31) Finding includes:On 1/5/26 at 11:32 A.M., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and osteomyelitis. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/31/25, indicated Resident 31 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff (staff does all of the work) for toileting and bathing, and had a foot infection and surgical wound.Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Cleanse area with wound cleanser and pat dry. Skin prep peri-wound and allow to dry. Cut and place drape around wound bed. Cut to fit foam and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper tracheal suctioning and oxygen services were provided according to physician orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 24)Finding includes:On 1/4/26 at 11:23 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 15 was observed walking into Resident 24's room without donning Person Protective Equipment (PPE). Resident 24 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) because of a tracheostomy. Prior to preparing to suction the tracheostomy, the inner cannula was observed sitting on the resident's bedside table with the speaking valve present. LPN 15 donned clean gloves and proceeded to take the used (contaminated) suction catheter from an open package near the suction machine. LPN 15 then proceeded to use the catheter to suction the tracheostomy several times without the inner cannula present. LPN 15 replaced the used (contaminated) inner cannula with the speaking valve on.On 1/5/26 at 12:50 P.M., Resident 24's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess resident for pain, failed to follow the facility policy for pain management, and ensure attempts for pain management were made for residents who experienced pain for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for fall resulting in fracture. (Resident 7) A resident did not receive pain management after a fall that resulted in a fractured shoulder. Finding includes:On 1/5/26 at 2:37 P.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/18/25, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance (staff does most of the work) for toileting and transfers, and indicated the resident had a fall with major injury since the prior MDS assessment. The MDS Assessment indicated Resident 7 had frequently experienced pain in the last five days,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 24) observed during the medication pass. There were 31 opportunities observed with 6 errors, resulting in a 19.35 percent medication error rate. Finding includes: During an observation of medication administration on 1/6/26 at 7:50 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 7 prepared the following medications for Resident 24. The QMA did not check for residual or flush the PEG tube prior to administration of the medications. The following medications were all crushed together along with the liquid medications and given to the resident through the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) at one time:methadone 30 milligrams (mg) from 10 mg/mL (milliliters) liquidlorazepam 0.5 mg tabletNorvasc 5 mg tabletSenna 8.6 mg tabletLexapro 10 mg from 5mg/5mL liquidFerrous Sulfate 325 mg taabOn 1/5/26 at 12:50 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain radiology services, or transportation to receive radiology services in a timely manner, to meet the needs of a resident following a fall for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for fall with fracture. (Resident 7) Finding includes: On 1/5/26 at 2:37 P.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/18/25, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance (staff does most of the work) for toileting and transfers, and indicated the resident had a fall with major injury since the prior MDS assessment. The previous MDS Assessment, dated 8/20/25, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance for toileting, and required partial assistance for transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility Administrator failed to dispose of illegal substances, report illegal substances to law enforcement and the State Survey Agency (SSA), and follow the Controlled Medication Disposal policy. Confiscated marijuana was kept in an open container in an unlocked closet in the Administrator's office. (Administrator)Finding includes:During an interview on 1/5/26 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 3 indicated that a staff member had confiscated smoking paraphernalia out of his bedside table drawer. On 1/5/26 at 10:35 A.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/27/25 indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact, was independent in all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and had no behaviors.A care plan conference was completed on 10/9/25 with the resident in attendance. His care plan was reviewed.Current care plans included, but were not limited to:I am at risk for complications related to substance abuse: alcohol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a written contract with an outside resource detailing the services provided and the timeliness of the services. A pain clinic was providing services to a resident without a contract or communication about those services to the facility. (Resident 3)Finding includes:On 1/5/26 at 10:35 A.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome and opioid dependence. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/27/25, indicated that Resident 3 was cognitively intact, was independent in all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and received an opioid medication during the 7-day lookback period. A care conference was completed on 10/9/25 with the resident in attendance. His care plan was reviewed. Current care plans included, but were not limited to:I am at risk for complications related to substance abuse: alcohol abuse, opioid dependence, initiated 6/26/25I have acute/chronic pain related to ulcerative colitis, sacral wound with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention measures for 2 of 2 random observations, Hand washing was not completed according to professional standards and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not worn as ordered. (Resident 24 and Resident 33)Findings include: 1. On 1/4/26 at 11:23 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 15 was observed walking into Resident 24's room without donning Person Protective Equipment (PPE). Resident 24 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) because of a tracheostomy. Prior to preparing to suction the tracheostomy, the inner cannula was observed sitting on the resident's bedside table with the speaking valve present. LPN 15 donned clean gloves and proceeded to take a contaminated suction catheter from an open package near the suction machine. LPN 15 then proceeded to use the catheter to suction the tracheostomy several times without the inner cannula present. LPN 15 later replaced the contaminated inner cannula with the speaking valve on. On 1/5/26 at 12:50 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff members providing direct care, including contractual staff, were thoroughly trained for provision of tracheostomy care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care and care of a wound vac for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for surgical wounds. (Resident 24 and Resident 31)Findings include: On 1/4/26 at 11:23 A.M., Resident 24 was observed to receive tracheostomy care from a contractual staff member, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 15. During the observation, LPN 15 failed to follow infection control techniques, including but not limited to the following:Did not don Preventive Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to providing care, Used clean gloves with a contaminated suction catheter to suction a tracheostomy, Did not use sterile gloves for a sterile procedure, andReplaced a contaminated inner cannula. On 1/5/26 at 12:50 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physicians orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, and care plan interventions were not implemented for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Blood pressure parameter orders were not followed, fall interventions were not implemented. ( Resident B, Resident D) Findings includes: 1. On 12/3/24 at 12:57 p.m., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. Resident D admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, essential hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, fracture of unspecified part of neck left femur. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated cognition was intact, no mobility devices used, toileting set up or clean up, shower/bathe set up or clean up, mobility sit to stand independent, chair/bed to chair transfer, independent, tub/shower transfer independent, walk 10 feet once standing, independent. Care plans were reviewed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin was given in accordance with professional standards for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for insulin. Residents were given insulin late and by unqualified staff. (Resident 18, Resident 1, Resident 17, Resident 11, Resident 8) Findings include: 1. On 10/9/24 at 10:06 A.M., Resident 18's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/22/24, indicated Resident 18 had no cognitive impairment and received insulin. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Humalog (insulin lispro - a short-acting insulin) KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 unit/mL (milliliters) - Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 140 = 0 units; 141 - 180 = 2 units; 181 - 240 = 4 units; 241 - 300 = 6 units; 301 - 350 = 8 units; 351 - 400 = 10 units; 401 - 600 = 12 units subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for type 2 diabetes mellitus, dated 7/11/24 The September 2024 Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative when residents left the facility independently for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. (Resident 22, Resident 75) Findings include: 1. On 10/9/24 at 2:12 P.M., Resident 22's guardian indicated staff should contact her every time the resident left the facility. On 10/4/24 she let the facility know that it was ok for the resident to leave on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays and did not need to be contacted on those days. On 10/9/24 at 9:12 A.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia and stimulant dependence. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/20/24, indicated Resident 22 had no cognitive impairment and was independent in all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A Letters of Temporary Guardianship document, dated 8/29/24, indicated Resident 22 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had orders upon admission for their PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter), wound care, management of their wound vac, and an order for enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident 225) Finding includes: On 10/9/24 at 11:40 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 9 was observed preparing vancomycin 750 milligrams (mg) / 150 milliliters (mL) to administer to Resident 225. A sign on the door indicated the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). RN 9 did not donn a gown prior to caring for the resident. RN 9 flushed the first lumen on Resident 225's PICC line with 10 mL of saline and then flushed the second lumen on the PICC line with 8 mL of saline. RN 9 hooked the vancomycin to the PICC line and set the medication to run at 150 drops per minute. At that time, a wound vac was observed on the resident's coccyx. On 10/9/24 at 1:53 P.M., Resident 225's clinical record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed for a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and intravenous access and residents with falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for antibiotic use and 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 21, Resident 10, Resident 2) Findings include: 1. On 10/8/24 at 2:32 P.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses on admission included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and borderline personality disorder. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/25/24, indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact, did not have PTSD, and did not have IV (intravenous) access. A current care plan, dated 9/19/24, indicated (Resident) received IV Medications related to osteomyelitis of right foot, Date Initiated: 9/19/24. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 12:41 P.M., the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a baseline care plan related to their wounds and wound management for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 225) Finding includes: On 10/9/24 at 11:40 A.M., a wound vac was observed on Resident 225's coccyx. On 10/9/24 at 1:53 P.M., Resident 225's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 225 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection in the bone). An admission skilled nursing note, dated 10/6/24, indicated that Resident 225 had a power injection catheter in right chest and wounds on the left gluteal fold, right gluteal fold, coccyx, and left toe. Initial wound measurements were: Left gluteal fold 6 cm (centimeters) x 2 cm x 0.2 cm Right gluteal fold 3 cm x 1.5 cm x 0.2 cm Coccyx wound vac in place Left toe 1.2 cm x 0.1 cm x 0.1 cm. The clinical record lacked baseline care plans for 4 of 4 of Resident 225's documented wounds, as well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Care plans were not revised after falls, substance misuse, and determination of elopement risk. (Resident 2, Resident 22) Findings include: 1. On 10/9/24 at 12:22 P.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side, and symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident 2 was mildly cognitively impaired, required partial assistance of staff (staff does less than half) with hygiene and dressing, and had no fall since the prior assessment. Physician's orders included, but were not limited to: Bilateral side rails to promote bed mobility every shift, dated 4/8/24. Activity Level: WBAT (Weight Bearing as Tolerated), dated 4/8/24. The current falls care plan indicated that Resident 2 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure social services were provided to meet a resident's mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for mood disturbances. (Resident 21) Finding includes: During an interview on 10/8/24 at 11:38 A.M., Resident 21 appeared to be anxious and indicated he had a history of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) but had not met with mental health services since admission. On 10/8/24 at 2:32 P.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses on admission included, but were not limited to, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Borderline Personality Disorder. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/25/24, indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact and was independent for eating, toileting, and transfers. A review of current orders indicated Resident 21 was not receiving medications related to mental health diagnoses. Current care plans included, but were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's as needed antianxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 18) Finding includes: On 10/9/24 at 10:06 A.M., Resident 18's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/22/24, indicated Resident 18 had no cognitive impairment and received an antianxiety medication. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: diazepam (an antianxiety medication) 2 milligrams (mg) - Give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety, dated 8/28/24 with no end date. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 8/28/24 to 10/9/24 indicated Resident 18 received as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication on the following dates: 8/28/24 8/29/24 8/30/24 9/2/24 9/3/24 9/4/24 9/6/24 9/10/24 9/11/24 9/16/24 9/17/24 9/18/24 9/23/24 9/24/24 9/25/24 9/26/24 10/1/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled, opened-multi-dose containers were dated, and medication carts were free of loose pills for 1 of 2 medication carts observed. (100 hall med cart) Finding includes: On 10/9/24 at 7:40 A.M., the following were observed in the 100 hall med cart: an oblong maroon colored pill a small round white pill two dropper bottles of medication with no patient label two open bottles of multi-dose medications with no date written on them to indicate when they had been opened On 10/10/24 at 1:50 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that multi-dose medications such as Miralax, did not need to have the date opened written on them. A Medication Labeling and Storage policy, provided by the Administrator on 10/11/24 at 8:30 A.M., indicated medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received . multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was correctly prepared for 2 of 2 residents who received puree altered diets. Finding includes: During an observation on 10/10/24 at 10:02 A.M., Dietary [NAME] 4 was preparing puree foods for resident's with altered dietary needs. The recipe #1028 titled Ham with Raisin Sauce Pureed Thick indicated the following measurements for 15 servings: Baked Ham with Raisin Sauce - 15 of three slices, 2 tablespoons sauce Apple Juice - 7.5 of four fluid ounces Food thickener - 3/4 cup 3 tablespoons Dietary [NAME] 4 gathered food and supplies for five (5) servings for each food. Dietary [NAME] 4 indicated she was unsure of the conversion from 15 servings to 5 servings. The Administrator wrote the conversions on the recipe and gave it to Dietary [NAME] 4. The handwritten conversions were written as follows: Five ham slices with raisin sauce 14 ounces of fluid for apple juice Thickener 1/4 cup and one tablespoon Dietary [NAME] 4 put the following food amounts in the puree machine: 15 slices of ham 1/2 cup (four fluid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. Documentation required for a resident leave of absence (LOA) was not completed and neurological checks were not completed as ordered after a fall. (Resident 22, Resident 21, Resident 2) Findings include: 1. On 10/9/24 at 9:12 A.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia and stimulant dependence. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/20/24, indicated Resident 22 had no cognitive impairment and was independent in all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A Letters of Temporary Guardianship document, dated 8/29/24, indicated Resident 22 was assigned a court-appointed guardian. An admission Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident 22 was at low risk for elopement.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a PICC (peripheral injection central catheter) and multiple wounds was provided enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident 225) Finding includes: On 10/9/24 at 11:40 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 9 was observed preparing vancomycin 750 milligrams (mg) / 150 milliliters (mL) to administer to Resident 225. A sign on the door indicated the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). RN 9 did not donn a gown prior to caring for the resident. RN 9 flushed the first lumen on Resident 225's PICC line with 10 mL of saline and then flushed the second lumen on the PICC line with 8 mL of saline. RN 9 hooked the vancomycin to the PICC line and set the medication to run at 150 drops per minute. At that time, a wound vac was observed on the resident's coccyx. On 10/9/24 at 1:53 P.M., Resident 225's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection in the bone). An admission skilled nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP did not currently dedicate at least part time to the role of IP for 1 of 1 staff members reviewed for IP. Findings include: On 10/8/24 at 12:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was currently responsible for the infection prevention and control program in the facility. She indicated she worked full time as the DON, and was able to dedicate about 8 hours per week on the infection control program. On 10/9/24 at 1:49 P.M., the DON's employee file was reviewed. The DON had an IP certification dated 11/14/21. On 10/11/24 at 8:50 A.M. the Administrator provided a current undated Job Description: Infection Preventionist Nurse job description. The job description indicated . the IP provides assistance to the Director of Nursing when needed. On 10/9/24 at 11:30 A.M., the Administrator provided a current Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP), dated 8/2022, that indicated The community shall designate a member of the clinical team to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program based on identification, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events in the facility within the past year. The data collection form lacked sufficient detail to identify potential high-risk, high-volume, or problem-prone areas for improvement that were counted under the other category of the data collection form. Findings include: During an interview on 7/13/23 at 9:29 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), they indicated they were not aware of any Performance Improvement Projects occurring at the present time or during the past year. They indicated there was no formal mechanism for staff to report concerns; staff leave notes in the administrators' mailboxes. No QAA committee meeting minutes were available. During a phone call with the administrator on 7/13/23 at 10:51 A.M., the administrator indicated the meeting minutes were at home in her briefcase and she was out of town. During record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 11. On 7/12/23 at 6:48 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/31/23, indicated Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment, required limited assistance of 1 staff for transferring, eating, and toileting, and had delusions. The clinical record lacked documented care plan conferences between 1/5/21 and 5/16/23. 12. On 7/11/23 at 11:04 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left nondominant side. The most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/12/23, indicated Resident 4 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, transferring, and toileting and extensive assistance of 1 staff for eating. The clinical record lacked documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored appropriately in 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Food containers were found not labeled in the the dry storage area and shelving in prep area in the kitchen.(Kitchen) Findings include: On 7/10/23 between 6:45 A.M. and 7:10 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour the following was observed: Spices under silver prep table 1 opened container of garlic bread seasoning with a use by day of 4/17/23 1 opened container of garlic herb seasoning with used by date of 6/23/23 1 opened container of ground nutmeg with a use by date of 5/12/23 1 opened container of onion powder with use by date of 1/15/23 1 opened container of minced onion undated 1 opened container of lemon pepper seasoning undated 1 opened container of garlic salt undated 1 opened container of whole gloves with a use by date 11/2/22 1 measuring cup covered with plastic wrap of white granular substance undated and unlabeled, which the cook indicated was food thickener On 7/10/23 between 7:11 A.M. and 7:35 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 20, Resident 21) Findings include: 1. On 7/12/23 at 7:37 A.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 3 was observed to administer medications for Resident 20 in his room. Medications prepared for administration included, but was not limited to, a Juven packet (nutrition powder) mixed in 8 oz (ounces) of water. LPN 3 handed Resident 20 his medications and left the room before the resident took the Juven. On 7/12/23 at 9:36 A.M., Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and visual field defects. The most recent significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/1/23, indicated Resident 20 was cognitively intact and had a diabetic foot ulcer. Current physician orders included, but was not limited to:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to provide each resident with food and drink that is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Food that was supposed to be served hot was served at below the recommended temperature; food that was supposed to be cold was served above the recommended temperature for 1 of 1 meal trays reviewed for food temperature. Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident 8 on 7/10/23 at 9:55 A.M., the resident stated Yuk when asked about the food. Then she indicated the hot food was served lukewarm. On 7/11/23 at 12:34 P.M., the temperatures were measured on the last food tray that was served on the resident's hall. The temperatures were: Broccoli 126.0 F Baked potato 128.0 F Milk 49.7 F Banana pudding 45.7 F Salad 50.1 F 2. During an interview on 7/11/23 at 11:22 A.M., the dietary supervisor indicated he takes temps for employee first who eat at 11:30 A.M., then re-checks the food temperatures before the residents eat at 12:00 to 12:15 P.M. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 11:22 A.M., the dietary supervisor indicated most of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post a current Nurse Staffing Information form for 4 of 4 days during the survey period.Finding includes:On 1/4/26 at 8:53 A.M., a Nurse Staffing Information form was observed on the main lobby desk. It was dated 1/2/26. On 1/5/26 at 9:24 A.M., a Nurse Staffing Information form was observed on the main lobby desk. It was dated 1/5/25. On 1/6/26 at 3:22 P.M., a Nurse Staffing Information form was observed on the main lobby desk. It was dated 1/5/25. On 1/7/26 at 8:23 A.M., a Nurse Staffing Information form was observed on the main lobby desk. It was dated 1/5/25. During an interview on 1/7/26 at 8:39 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she oversaw the Posted Nurse Staffing form. She completed the form every morning that she was there, and on weekends the weekend night nurse would complete it. On 1/7/26 at 2:03 P.M., the Administrator provided a current Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy, dated 8/2024, that indicated Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the charge nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-10-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post accurate actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily for 3 of 4 days during the annual survey period. Finding includes: During an observation on 10/8/24 at 3:12 P.M., a posted nurse staffing data sheet, dated 10/8/24, was observed on the front desk inside the main entrance. The sheet included, but was not limited to, the following information: Census, total number of staff for each shift and total hours of each shift for Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA). The sheet indicated that staff worked day shift, evening shift, and night shift, but did not indicate the actual hours of those shifts. The sheet indicated 1 CNA worked 4 hours during the evening shift, but did not specify the actual hours that the staff worked. On 10/10/24 at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of posted nurse staffing sheets for dates 10/8/24, 10/9/24, and 10/10/24. Each of these dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a RN (Registered Nurse) worked 8 consecutive hours in the facility on any given day for 2 of 14 days reviewed for nurse staffing. Findings include: The staffing schedules were reviewed from 6/25/23-7/8/23 on 7/13/23 at 9:30 A.M. There was no RN scheduled on 7/3-7/4/23. The RN that was to work was scheduled from 6:30 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. on 7/3/23 but did not work there was no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours for either day. The DON took a holiday on 7/3/23. She was on call on 7/4/23 but did not work. During an interview on 7/13/23 at 10:00 A.M., the DON indicated she was not able to work on-site due to family problems. During an interview on 7/13/23 at 11:07 A.M., the administrator indicated there was an emergency with the RN who was scheduled to work on 7/3/23 so there was no RN coverage on 7/3/23 and 7/4/23. On 7/13/23 a current undated policy Staffing was provided by the ADON at 12:52 A.M., indicated .the facility provides sufficient numbers of staff .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .3.) .the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-07-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed nurse staffing sheets were posted daily 4 of 4 days during the survey.( 7/10/23, 7/11/23, 7/12/23, and 7/13/23) Findings includes: On 7/10/23 at 6:40 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed hanging on a television monitor across from the front desk in lobby dated 7/10/23. The sheet included, but was not limited to the following information: Shift hours for RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Total number of RN, LPN, and CNA for each shift Total hours of RN, LPN, and CNA for each shift The sheet did not specify which actual hours were worked by each discipline during the specified shift when the total hours were not equal to the number of staff. On 7/11/23 at 8:00 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed hanging on a television monitor across from the front desk in lobby dated 7/11/23. The sheet included, but was not limited to the following information: Shift hours for RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and CNA (Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 07/01/2014 |
| BRAUN, MARGARET | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/17/1986 |
| MCKEE, KEITH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| WILLS, NIKKI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| JAROSINSKI, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| MALOTT, GREGG | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| ENVIVE OF RIVER CITY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $425K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155520. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.