Envive Of Hartford City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 34.9 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency within the required time frame. (Resident B) Findings include A facility reported incident, dated 10/27/25 at 4:19 p.m., submitted to the Indiana Department of Health indicated an incident occurred on 10/27/25 at 3:01 p.m. The reported incident indicated the following: On 10/27/25 Resident B reported to the Administrator that CNAs yelled at her on 10/26/25. On 10/27/25 an investigation was initiated, and the CNAs were suspended pending the investigation outcome. Review of the facility's abuse investigation file, provided on 11/6/25 at 11:49 a.m., included the following: RN 9's statement indicated Resident B's representative approached the nurses station on 10/26/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m. and asked to talk to someone about a concern she had regarding the resident. Resident B had reported to her that Resident B had overheard, at lunch, the CNAs say from around a corner that she was old enough and should not be peeing herself, and that they were not going to continue to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse and failed to implement immediate interventions to prevent potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. (Resident B) Findings include: A facility reported incident, dated 10/27/25 at 4:19 p.m., submitted to the Indiana Department of Health indicated an incident occurred on 10/27/25 at 3:01 p.m. The reported incident indicated the following: On 10/27/25 Resident B reported to the Administrator that CNAs yelled at her on 10/26/25. On 10/27/25 an investigation was initiated, and the CNAs were suspended pending the investigation outcome. CNA 3 and CNA 5 were the CNAs mentioned in the report. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/6/25 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included fracture of lower end of left femur, chronic kidney disease, stage 4, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, morbid obesity due to excess calories, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. Current orders included torsemide (diuretic) 20 mg daily and resident uses a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's dignity by failing to provide necessary assistive mechanical lift slings for the transfer process resulting in a resident having to remain in bed despite her preferences for daily activities for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 26)Finding includes: During an interview, on 9/22/25 at 10:34 a.m., Resident 26 indicated she required a mechanical lift for transferring from bed to her wheelchair and back to the bed. She was informed by facility staff there was a limited supply of mechanical lift slings, and she had to stay in bed over the previous weekend due to a mechanical lift sling not being available. She had soiled her sling due to incontinence and then had to wait for two days for the sling to be washed, air dried, and returned to the floor. Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed on 9/25/25 at 4:02 p.m. Diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy (shrink), fracture of the lower end of the femur (thigh bone that extends from hip to knee), morbid obesity, muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered adaptive equipment for eating was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) (Resident 29). Finding includes: During an observation, on 9/22/25 at 11:40 a.m., Resident 29 was served lunch. His meal was served on a regular plate, regular bowl, and regular utensils. No adaptive utensils, plateware, or cups were observed in the dining room. During an observation, on 9/23/25 at 11:44 a.m., Resident 29 used regular utensils, cups, and plates during lunch. Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed on 9/24/25 at 3:04 p.m. Diagnoses included unspecified intellectual disabilities, vascular dementia, muscle weakness (generalized), and dysphagia (difficulty/discomfort swallowing) oropharyngeal phase. Current orders included resident to use built up handled utensils, one handled cup with spout, scoop bowl, and plate with suction base at all meals (9/27/24). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/11/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide transfer assistance to a dependent resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident 26)Finding includes:During an interview, on 9/22/25 at 10:34 a.m., Resident 26 indicated she required a mechanical lift for transferring from bed to her wheelchair and back to the bed. She was informed by facility staff there was a limited supply of mechanical lift slings, and she had to stay in bed over the previous weekend due to a mechanical lift sling not being available. She had soiled her sling due to incontinence and then had to wait for two days for the sling to be washed, air dried, and returned to the floor. Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed on 9/25/25 at 4:02 p.m. Diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy (shrink), fracture of the lower end of the femur (thigh bone that extends from hip to knee), morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and anxiety.A 9/2/25, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident 26' was cognitively intact. She was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered diet was followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 16). Finding includes:Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed on 9/24/25 at 3:47 p.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia, and dementia.Current orders included regular diet with mechanical soft texture, no mashed potatoes, straws with liquids and given on right side of mouth, small sips (5/2/25), sitagliptin phosphate (for diabetes) 50 mg daily (9/24/25), and insulin glargine 100 units/mL - inject 15 units twice a day (5/10/25). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/21/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He required supervision and cueing with eating. A current nutritional care plan (revised on 5/21/25) indicated the resident was at risk for malnutrition related to chronic disease, a body mass index greater than 25, and altered carbohydrate metabolism from diabetes. Interventions included provide and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure carpeting in resident rooms, hallways and common areas were clean and free from stains for 2 of 2 units in the facility (100 hall and 200 hall). This deficient practice had the potential to impact 25 of 25 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include:Confidential interviews were conducted during the survey. During a confidential interview, it was indicated the hallways had spots or stains. The facility said they would have the carpet cleaned. It was at least five months since they shampooed it. It needed a good scrub. During a confidential interview, it was indicated the facility shampooed the carpet once in a while, but not often.During a confidential interview, it was indicated there had been spots on hallway carpets for quite a while.During a confidential interview, it was indicated there was heavy staining on the carpet in empty resident rooms.During a confidential interview, it was indicated the facility did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were properly labeled and disposed of for 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (200 Front Hall Cart) Finding includes: During an observation, on 3/13/25 beginning at 11:04 a.m., the top drawer in the left section of the 200 Front Hall Medication Cart contained an uncovered paper medication cup containing a green capsule, two cream-colored capsules, two round white tablets, and one oblong oval shaped white tablet. The paper cup had Resident N's last name and the words evening meds written in pen on it. During an interview, at the same time of the observation above, LPN 3 indicated she had not noticed the paper cup of medications in the cart when she passed medications earlier. Resident N had probably refused the medications, and the evening shift nurse had forgotten to destroy them. When a resident refused his/her medication, the medication should be destroyed right away. During an interview, on 3/13/25 at 11:06 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated medications should be destroyed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for resident choices. (Resident C) B. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on reported resident's concerns for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for resident choices. (Resident B) Findings include: A. During an interview on 11/1/24 at 1:51 p.m., Resident C's representative indicated the resident had problems with swelling in his lower extremities. The resident had requested compression wraps for his bilateral lower legs some time back, but the facility had not provided the compression wraps. The resident's representative indicated he had asked the nurse again on 11/1/24 for compression wraps for the resident's bilateral lower legs to help with the ongoing swelling in the resident's lower legs and feet. During an observation at the time of interview, the resident's bilateral legs and feet were elevated in his recliner, moderately swollen, and without compression wraps. During an observation on 11/6/24 at 4:20 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and addressed in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 16 and Resident 18). Findings include: 1. Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed on 11/7/24 at 11:52 a.m. Diagnoses included aphasia following cerebral infarction, depression, disorientation, and anxiety disorder. Physician's orders included lorazepam (antianxiety) 0.5 mg (milligrams) two tablets every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety/agitation (started 10/27/24) and lorazepam 0.5 mg every 6 hours PRN anxiety/agitation (started 8/5/24 and discontinued 10/27/24). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/28/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A medication administration record for August 2024 indicated the resident was given lorazepam 0.5 mg on 8/5/24 at 5:04 p.m. and 11:05 p.m., 8/7/24 at 11:24 a.m., and 8/12/24 at 9:03 p.m. A medication regimen review, completed on 8/19/24, indicated lorazepam 0.5 mg give every 6 hours PRN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN