Envive Of Huntington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 45.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised with appropriate and individualized fall prevention interventions to mitigate the risk for further falls for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents B, C, D and E)Findings include: 1.Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 4/6/26 at 10:39 a.m. Diagnoses included essential (primary) hypertension, syncope and collapse, muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care, and cognitive communication deficit. A 2/19/26, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. He used a wheelchair for mobility. He was dependent for toileting, lower body dressing, footwear, personal hygiene, bed mobility, sit to stand, and transfers. He had no falls at that time. His medications included muscle rub cream (pain reliever) twice daily, finasteride (treat benign prostatic hyperplasia) 5 mg daily, diclofenac sodium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hair coverings were utilized by dietary staff to ensure hygienic meal preparation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 43 of 43 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen.Findings include: On 3/16/26 at 7:36 a.m., during breakfast service, the following was observed:The Dietary Manager was walking throughout the kitchen without a hair cover or beard cover. His beard was approximately the length of a pencil top eraser. The Dietary Manager plated 43 plates of food without wearing a hair cover or beard cover.During an interview, on 3/16/26 at 7:58 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated he was unaware he needed to wear a hair cover or a beard net, as his hair was so short.A posted sign on the kitchen door indicated the following: Hair nets must be worn beyond this point.During an interview, on 3/18/26 at 1:51 p.m., the Administrator indicated the Dietary Manager should have worn a hair net and beard net cover while he was in the kitchen.A current facility policy, dated 1/2023, titled Culinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mail delivery to residents on Saturdays for 7 of 7 residents interviewed during a Resident Council group interview. (Residents 6, 14, 15, 16, 24, 36, 37) Findings include:During the Resident Council group interview, on 3/18/26 at 10:00 a.m., regular attendees reported that mail was not delivered within the facility on Saturdays. Resident 36 indicated the staff member responsible for mail delivery was not present on weekends, and any mail received by the facility on Saturday was held until Monday before being distributed. Residents 6, 14, 15, 16, 24, and 37 confirmed that mail received on Saturdays was routinely delayed until Monday.During an interview, on 3/20/26 at 9:38 a.m., the Activities Director indicated the facility had previously provided mail delivery on Saturdays; however, since the staff member responsible for weekend mail delivery was no longer employed by the facility, residents had not received mail on Saturdays for approximately the past month and a half.During an interview with the Administrator, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a manner to prevent loose pills in the medication cart drawers and eye drops had opened dates to indicate when to discard them for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.Findings include: During a medication storage observation, on 3/17/26 at 8:29 a.m., accompanied by RN 3, a white round pill inscribed with 54/27 and a blue round pill was found in the second drawer on the left side of the 200-hallway medication cart. A clear oval capsule, one white round pill inscribed 40, a white round pill inscribed EP 117, and a white round pill inscribed B05 was found in the third drawer on the left side of the 200- hallway medication cart. RN 3 indicated that the pills should be destroyed in the drug buster (a drug disposal liquid). The medication carts were cleaned out during third shift. Two eye drop containers were opened without open dates written on the container or box. RN 8 indicated that eye drop containers should have an open date written on them.During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received hypodermoclysis (infusion of hydrating fluids in the fatty layer of skin) in accordance with physician orders regarding rate of infusion and failed to ensure hydration fluids were not administered after their expiration date for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for parental fluids. (Resident 20) Findings include: During a random observation, on 3/16/26 at 9:01 a.m., Resident 20 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. A bag of normal saline (NS) 0.9% was transfusing at a rate of 150 mL/HR (milliliter per hour) as indicated by the dial knob. The dial knob had a red arrow pointed at 150. The bag had a marking of 3/14 written on it, and that it was the second bag infused.During a random observation, on 3/16/26 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 20 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room. A bag of normal saline 0.9% dated 3/14 was running at 150mL/HR per the dial knob.During an observation, on 3/16/26 at 9:34 a.m., with LPN 4 and the DON present, the following was observed: Resident 20 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's (Resident B) right to be treated with dignity and respect by CNA 6 when the resident requested their assistance for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include:Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 1/30/26 at 8:54 a.m. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and need for assistance with personal care. Her quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/25, indicated she was cognitively intact. She used a walker and a manual wheelchair for mobility. She required substantial to maximal assistance with lower body dressing and sitting to standing. She required partial to moderate assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene. She was dependent with transfers. Her current care plan for risk for impaired communication, revised on 1/12/26, indicated that she was hard of hearing. Her interventions initiated on 11/14/24 included allow adequate time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse and neglect timely and with accurate information to the State Agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (CNA 6 and Resident B)Findings include:The facility's investigation was provided by the Administrator, on 1/30/26 at 9:23 a.m., and included the following information: A 1/8/26 Facility Reported Incident indicated on 1/8/26 it was reported to the Administrator that CNA 6 had allegedly yelled at Resident B. The 1/11/26 follow up indicated it was found that CNA 6 had raised her voice as she was in full PPE and Resident B could not hear her through her mask. CNA 6 indicated that she did indicate to the resident not to turn on her call light unless she needed something. CNA 6 was educated on professionalism.The incident report lacked indication of an allegation of threat to withhold services from the resident. A 1/7/26, typed statement signed by the Activity Director indicated she reported to the Administrator that she heard someone yelling loudly while she was putting things away in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and protect resident dignity by ensuring residents' written consent was received per facility policy before posting photographs and videos on the facility's social media platforms for 2 of 8 residents reviewed. (Resident D and E)Findings include:A facility social media posting, on 7/28/25, showed a photograph of Resident D during an arts and crafts activity. A facility social media posting, on 8/13/25, showed photographs of some of the facility's residents at a lake during a meal. Resident E was pictured in the online photographs. Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 10:34 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, depression, and mild cognitive impairment.During an interview, on 9/19/25 at 11:45 a.m., the Administrator indicated Resident D did not have a signed photography/video release form in her admission packet.A consent record, provided by the Administrator, on 9/19/25 at 2:12 p.m., indicated Resident D signed consent for photographs intended for medical records and activities. The consent did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement facility policy for assistive device use during a mobility transfer of a physically dependent resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for transfers. (Resident M)Findings include:Resident M's clinical record was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 11:43 a.m. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, tremors and difficulty in walking.Current orders included weight bearing as tolerated with hip (protection) precautions.A 9/12/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident M had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side. Resident M was dependent on staff members for chair/bed to chair transfers.Resident M's current care plan included: I have an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self- care performance deficit related to Parkinson's disease, tremors, and weakness initiated on 4/4/25 and reviewed on 8/7/25. Interventions included transfers required extensive assistance with two staff members. CNA may use mechanical lift as needed.During an observation, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices during urinary catheter and incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident M)Findings include:Resident M's clinical record was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 11:43 a.m. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, diabetes, muscle weakness, and tremors.A 9/12/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated resident was cognitively intact. Resident M had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side. Resident M was dependent on staff members for toileting.Resident M's current care plan included: I have an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self- care performance deficit related to Parkinson's disease, tremors, and weakness initiated on 4/4/25 and reviewed on 8/7/25. Interventions included toilet use: assistance with toileting needs, dependent on two staff members.During an incontinence care observation, on 9/19/25 at 10:24 a.m., CNA 3 washed her hands and put on gloves. Resident M had had a small bowel movement. After providing incontinence care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN