Envive Of Muncie

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.8 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-31 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice to the residents and/or their representatives pertaining to transfer/discharge rights and the facility's bed hold policy for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident's 4, 27, and 45). Findings include: 1. Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 12:59 p.m. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), and vascular dementia.A progress note, dated 8/13/25 at 7:45 p.m., indicated Resident 4 was lethargic and had to be fed for dinner. Her speech was garbled. She intermittently responded to verbal or tactile stimuli. Resident 4's family was at bedside and requested the resident to be sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation. The on-call provider, DON, and ambulance to transport were notified. Hospital called and was given report. Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) transported the resident to the hospital.Resident 4's clinical record lacked documentation indicating if the Notice of Transfer rights and bed hold policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or the resident representative received a copy of the resident's baseline care plan following admission for 1of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 8) Finding includes:Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 10:30 a.m.Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided with a copy of the baseline care plan.During an interview, on 3/30/26 at 1:30 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) indicated she had not completed a baseline care plan conference review note for Resident 8 due to him not having had a care plan conference since his admission. As a result, no baseline care plan information was provided to Resident 8 or to his resident representative.During an interview, on 3/31/26 at 1:28 p.m., the SSD indicated baseline care plan information was to be conveyed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and administer appropriate pneumococcal vaccinations per the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. (Resident 27 and 45)Findings include: 1. Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed on 3/27/26 at 10:54 a.m. Diagnoses included tonsillar cancer, traumatic brain injury, and diabetes (high blood sugar).A review of the resident's vaccinations included the following:The resident had a historical administration, dated 12/19/11, of Pneumovax 23 pneumococcal vaccination (PPSV 23). This was prior to the resident's admission to the facility.The clinical record lacked a Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent or Declination Form.The clinical record lacked any offering of the pneumococcal vaccines PCV 15, 20, or 21 as recommended by the CDC.2. Resident 45's clinical record was reviewed on 3/27/26 at 3:15 p.m. Diagnoses included aortic valve insufficiency, heart disease, and muscle weakness.A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer the appropriate COVID-19 vaccinations per the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 45)Finding includes:Resident 45's clinical record was reviewed on 3/27/26 at 3:15 p.m. Diagnoses included aortic valve insufficiency, heart disease, and muscle weakness.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/9/26, indicated the resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired.A COVID-19 vaccine consent and a COVID-19 booster consent was signed by Resident 45's representative on 12/6/24.A review of the resident's vaccinations indicated the resident had not received a COVID-19 vaccination and the family representative had refused the vaccination in December 2024.The record lacked an updated or yearly COVID-19 vaccination consent or declination.During an interview, on 3/30/26 at 1:30 p.m., the DON indicated she was unable to locate current COVID-19 vaccination forms for Resident 45. The facility did not administer any vaccinations, and an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to mitigate the risk of accidents and injury by failing to ensure safety razors were securely stored in two shared bathrooms of 4 cognitively impaired residents (Resident C, Resident H, Resident N and Resident P) on the dementia unit. Findings include:1. During an observation of Resident C's bathroom (shared with Resident H), on 1/7/26 at 9:49 a.m., the unlocked tri-fold mirrored vanity above the sink contained a disposable razor. At the same time, the Memory Care Director entered the bathroom after speaking with Resident C and indicated that the razor should not be left in the residents' bathrooms.Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 1/7/26 at 3:27 p.m. Diagnoses included hallucinations, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety.A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/10/25, indicated he had severe cognitive impairment.Resident H's clinical record was reviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who had not been deemed able to self-administer medications, received supervision during a nebulizer medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (Resident E) randomly observed receiving a nebulizer treatment.Findings include:During a random observation on 1/7/26 at 10:12 a.m., Resident E was observed lying in bed with a nebulizer machine running. At the same time, RN 8 was seated at the [NAME] hall nurses' station.At 10:14 a.m., RN 8 entered Resident E's room, turned off the nebulizer, assessed the resident's lung sounds, and exited the room. RN 8 indicated that she did not normally remain with residents during their nebulizer treatments.Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 1/7/26 at 10:36 a.m. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, other schizophrenia, acute bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' personal care items were labeled and not cohorted with other resident's personal care items during observations for 3 shared bathrooms of 6 cognitively impaired residents (Resident C, Resident H, Resident F, Resident G, Resident J, Resident N and Resident P) on the dementia unit.Findings include:1.During an observation of Resident C's bathroom (shared with Resident H), on 1/7/26 at 9:49 a.m., the unlocked tri-fold mirrored vanity above the sink contained the following personal care items without resident identifiers:a. An empty bottle of Vashe Wound Cleanser.b. One partially used bottle of after shave gel.c. One open can of shaving cream.d. One partially used tube of perfumed body cream.e. Two denture brushes.f. One toothbrush.During the observation, the Memory Care Director entered the bathroom after speaking with Resident C and indicated that no one had wounds and they were not sure why the Vashe Wound Cleanser was in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure consistent shift-to-shift reconciliation of narcotics was completed to mitigate risk of misappropriation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 22 residents with controlled medications of 40 whose medications were stored and handled by the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility's August, September, and October 2025 narcotic shift- to- shift count sheets, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/17/25 at 10:37 a.m., were reviewed on 11/17/25 at 1:13 p.m. Narcotic medication counts were not reconciled on the following dates and shifts: August 20258/2/25 - second shift8/3/25 -first shift8/7/25 -first shift8/16/25 - second shift8/17/25 - first and second shift8/20/25 - first and second shift8/22/25 - first shift8/24/25 - second shift8/27/25 - first shift8/29/25 - second shift8/30/25 - second shiftSeptember 20259/13/25 - first shift9/14/25 - second shift9/21/25 - first shift9/25/25 - first shift9/27/25 - first shift9/30/25 - second shiftOctober 202510/2/25 - first and second shift10/9/25 -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic reconciliation was completed for 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (A Unit, Cottage Unit, and C Unit medication carts) This deficient practice had the potential to affect 18 out of 30 residents who resided in the facility and received controlled medications from A Unit, Cottage Unit, and C Unit medication carts. Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of A Unit medication cart, accompanied by LPN 9 on 6/5/25 at 9:55 a.m., the Shift To Shift Narcotic Count record was reviewed and was missing LPN 9's signature and count when she took over the cart at the beginning of her shift on 6/5/25. LPN 9 immediately signed her name to the blank and indicated she had not signed nor recorded her count at the beginning of her shift. The last recorded count of controlled medications indicated there were 9 sheets and 9 cards. Upon counting the cards and sheets, LPN 9 indicated there were 8 sheets and 8 cards, which was a discrepancy from the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bed hold policy and transfer/discharge notifications to the resident and/or their representative for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Residents 31, 24, & 191) B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer information was communicated to the receiving provider for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident 38) Findings include: A1. Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed on 6/6/25 at 1:41 p.m. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension. A 5/7/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A 3/4/25, discharge, MDS assessment indicated the resident discharged with a return anticipated. A 3/24/25 nurse's note indicated a new order to send the resident to the emergency room and all parties were aware. Review of a notice of transfer/discharge form, dated 3/4/25, indicated the resident was discharged to the hospital. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN