No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Envive Of Sullivan

325 W Northwood Dr, Sullivan, IN 47882 · For profit - Corporation · 77 certified beds · (812) 268-3351 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 268-3351 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2200 N Section St # A · (812) 268-6292 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
13 W Jackson St · (812) 268-4737 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
277 S Section St · (812) 268-5218 · Call to confirm hours
Park
990 E Picnic Rd · (812) 268-5537 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
306 W Northwood Dr · (812) 268-5408

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms55.4%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.7%11.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.7%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.6%95.4%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.6%23.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.6%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine24.4%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.071.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.891.441.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.6%CMS range 44.2–69.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.6–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.6–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.04
RN hours/ resident / day
0.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.78
RN hoursweekends
53.7%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-02)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine temperatures were monitored to be at appropriate temperatures for 1 of 3 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect 34 of 35 residents who were served meals out of the kitchen. Findings include:During the initial kitchen tour, on 5/17/26 at 9:09 a.m., the chemical dish machine was observed. A placard on the top of the dish machine indicated the minimal wash temperature was to be 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 140 degrees F for the rinse temperature. Three run attempts were completed before the machine reached the minimal wash and rinse temperatures. Observation of the dish machine temperature log sheets, dated May 2026, lacked documentation of the temperatures being monitored after the breakfast meal on 5/12/26. At the same time, the log indicated temperature readings below the required 140 degrees F on the following dates: a. 5/5/26: The breakfast meal temperature indicated 125 degrees F. b. 5/6/26: The breakfast meal temperature indicated 125 degrees F. c. 5/7/26: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified with new medication orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notifications (Resident B). Findings include: Resident B's record was reviewed on 9/29/25 at 10:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive and fatal brain disorder that causes memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline), cognitive communication deficit, and major depressive disorder recurrent and severe with psychotic symptoms (a severe form of depression characterized by persistent low mood, loss of interest, and other symptoms, accompanied by delusions and/or hallucinations). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/27/25, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. A physician's order, dated 4/25/25 and discontinued on 6/23/25, indicated Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily for major depressive disorder, recurrent and severe, with psychotic symptoms. A progress note, dated 6/23/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation was completed in the resident's electronic health record related to falls that occurred at the facility, and they failed to ensure interventions were implemented for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents C and B). Findings include: 1. Resident C's record was reviewed on 9/29/25 at 10:45 a.m. The profile indicated the resident diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia moderate with mood disturbance (a medical diagnosis with moderate level of dementia whose cause is unknown, accompanied by symptoms of mood disturbance like depression, apathy[lack of interest], of loss of pleasure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin), and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of heart rhythm disorder where the heart's upper chambers beat irregularly and rapidly for a short period). The facility census indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-02 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse other than the Director of Nursing (DON) was designated to oversee the Infection Prevention and Antibiotic Stewardship programs within the facility. This deficiency had the potential to affect 38 of 38 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: A review of the Infection control program identified antibiotic tracking and infection surveillance was not completed between 5/1/24 to 11/30/24. On 5/30/25 at 2:34 p.m., during interview the DON indicated she started working at the facility in December 2024 and began tracking at that time according to infection control policy. She indicated she was the only IP nurse in the facility and acknowledged she was responsible for tracking infections including TB testing and surveillance and the antibiotic stewardship program. She indicated she did not know the DON could not be the IP nurse and must have an additional nurse who has had the infection preventionist training appointed as the IP nurse. On 5/30/25 review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility tracked infections and antibiotic use within the facility and failed to ensure tuberculin testing was completed for 7 of 16 residents reviewed for immunizations and tuberculin testing administration (Residents 28, 4, 9, 14, 38, 192, and 5). Findings include: On 5/30/25 at 10:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 28 was reviewed. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. A Tuberculin skin test (a Mantoux test involves injecting a small amount of fluid called tuberculin or purified protein derivative, PPD under the skin, and then checking for a reaction a few days later) was administered on 1/1/25. The record lacked evidence the results of the test were read. The record lacked documentation of a second TB test being administered after a minimum of seven days after administration of the initial test. A second TB test was required upon admission to the facility to determine exposure to tuberculosis. On 5/30/25 at 10:05 a.m., the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessments were completed for 1 of 5 residents were reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 18). Findings include: Resident 18's record was reviewed on 1/23/25 at 11:06 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and major depressive disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistently low or depressed mood and loss of interest or please in activities). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/5/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was on anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medications. A care plan, dated 5/24/22, indicated the resident had impaired cognitive function related to Alzheimer's, dementia. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted quarterly for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for care plan meetings (Resident 9), and failed to ensure care plans were implemented and updated for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans (Residents 32 and 14). Findings include: 1. During a phone interview, on 5/2725 at 2:01 p.m., Resident 9's daughter indicated she did not remember being invited to a care plan meeting ever. She indicated she would be happy to attend via phone call if someone would reach out to her. Resident 9's record was reviewed on 5/29/25 at 11:27 a.m. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/3/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Census information indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A care conference review note, dated 2/13/25, indicated a care plan meeting was conducted on this day. The record lacked documentation of a care plan meeting being conducted before 2/13/25. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistance to shave for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care (Residents 33 and 21). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 5/27/25 at 11:11 a.m. Resident 33 was up in his wheelchair, in the therapy gym. Resident 33 had untrimmed beard and mustache facial hair growth. During an observation, on 5/28/25 at 1:52 p.m., Resident 33 was up in his wheelchair, in the hallway. The resident had untrimmed beard and mustache facial hair growth. At the same time, the resident indicated he did not want to have facial hair and wanted to be shaved at least once a week. During an observation, on 5/29/25 at 10:33 a.m., Resident 33 was sitting up in his wheelchair, in the therapy gym. The resident had untrimmed beard and mustache facial hair growth. During an observation, on 5/29/25 at 1:20 p.m., the resident was observed up in his wheelchair, in his room. The resident had untrimmed beard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was changed and dated according to facility policy for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 28). Findings include: On 5/27/25 at 11:17 a.m., during an initial observation an oxygen concentrator was in the resident's room next to the bed. Oxygen tubing was in a clear storage bag dated 4/27/25. During an interview the resident indicated she was not receiving oxygen. On 5/28/25 at 11:50 a.m., observed oxygen tubing inside of a clear storage bag, dated 4/27/25, which was attached to the oxygen concentrator next to the resident's bed. During an interview the resident again indicated she had not been receiving oxygen at any time including at night. On 5/28/25 at 11:55 a.m., during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated the oxygen tubing was changed weekly on Sunday nights. She indicated Resident 28 did not use her oxygen very often. On 5/29/25 at 9:39 a.m., the medical record of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's antibiotic was not administered past the stop date for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident 33). Findings include: Resident 33's record was reviewed on 5/28/25 at 2:03 p.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/29/25, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment and received an antibiotic during the assessment look-back period. A chest x-ray, dated 5/12/25, showed the resident had an infiltrate (pneumonia). A May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) included a physician's order, dated 5/12/25. The physician's order indicated doxycycline (an antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily for seven days for infection. The medication was documented as administered, from the evening of 5/12/25 to the evening of 5/27/25, and was not stopped after seven days. A pharmacy delivery log indicated 14 doxycycline 100 mg tablets were delivered to the facility for Resident 33 on 5/12/25. An Emergency Drug Kit (EDK) log indicated doxycycline 100 mg was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled properly and the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed and for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed (Residents 193 and 24). Findings include: 1. On 5/29/25 at 3:10 p.m., the medication storage room contained an undated multi use vial of Aplisol (a clear, colorless solution for injection as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis) solution. During an interview, on 5/29/25 at 3:10 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated she was not aware of how long Aplisol was good for once opened, but was aware the vial should be dated once opened. During an interview, on 5/29/25 at 3:15 p.m., the Regional Nurse Consultant indicated the vial of Aplisol was good for 30 days once opened. During an interview, on 5/29/25 at 3:16 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the vial of Aplisol should be dated once opened. On 5/29/25 at 4:04 p.m., the Regional Nurse Consultant provided an undated document, titled, Medications with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse was on duty 24 hours a day for 1 of 61 days reviewed on a shift when two residents fell (Residents W and T). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 42 of 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an anonymous interview Employee C indicated, on 12/25/24, there was no nurse in the facility on day shift, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The Director of Nursing (DON) came in at breakfast and lunch and administered insulin. Residents W and T fell on the shift, and there was no nurse at the facility at the time of the falls. A Facility Assessment, dated 10/24/24, indicated the facility's staffing pattern included two licensed nurses on day shift and one licensed nurse on night shift. A Daily Nursing Assignment Sheet, dated 12/25/24, indicated a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled as the charge nurse from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., but the name was crossed out. Two Qualified Medication Aides (QMAs) were scheduled on day shift. The top of the document included the DON's name and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were reordered in a timely manner so they were available for administration for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services (Resident D). Findings include: Resident D's record was reviewed on 1/31/25 at 11:04 a.m. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/20/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Diagnoses on the resident's face sheet included, but were not limited to, unspecified polyneuropathy (nerve damage throughout the body). A care plan, initiated on 8/30/22, indicated the resident had the potential for pain related to polyneuropathy. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated December 2024, indicated pregabalin (nerve pain medication) 75 milligrams (mg), 1 capsule 3 times daily for unspecified polyneuropathy. The MAR indicated the pregabalin was not available for administration on 12/27/24, 12/28/24, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature and palatability of food served for 1 of 1 test tray. Findings include: During a confidential interview, conducted during the survey, the interviewee indicated the resident's hall tray food was served cold for all meals, breakfast, lunch, and supper. During an interview, on 12/19/24 at 11:05 a.m., Resident C indicated she ate meals in her room and the food was served cold at times. Resident F, on 12/19/24 at 11:20 a.m., indicated he ate meals in his room and sometimes the food was not hot, but cold. During an interview, on 12/19/24 at 11:30 a.m., Resident E indicated she ate meals in her room and the food was often cold when she got it and did not taste very good. On 12/19/24 at 12:03 p.m., test tray food temperatures were measured by the Dietary Manager (DM). The fried potatoes temperature measured at 128 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the cooked broccoli temperature measured at 118 F, and the BBQ sandwich measured at 128 F. The DM indicated the food was too cool and the food temperatures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperature logs were maintained for 5 of 15 days in April and freezer temperature logs were maintained for 2 of 15 days in April. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour, on 4/15/24 at 10:10 a.m., with the housekeeping supervisor, the temperature logs for the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer were observed to have not been completed. At the same time, the housekeeping supervisor indicated she was filling in as the cook for that day. The regular cook, had the day off. The walk-in refrigerator temperature log, was observed sitting on a shelf in the dry storage area. The log lacked documentation of the refrigerator's temperatures for 4/1/24, 4/11/24, 4/12/24, 4/13/24, and 4/14/24. At the same time, the housekeeping supervisor documented the temperature of the walk-in refrigerator for the date of the initial tour, on the log. The walk-in freezer temperature log, was observed posted on the door of the walk-in freezer. The temperature log lacked documentation of the freezer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper administration of inhaled medication during the medication administration pass for 1 of 3 residents observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.67% (Resident 6). Finding includes: During a medication administration observation, on 4/17/24 at 9:01 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 was administering an Advair (medication used to prevent asthma symptoms) inhaler (small handheld devices that allows you to breath medicine through your mouth, directly to your lungs) to Resident 6. Resident 6 then handed the inhaler back to the nurse and the nurse immediately gave the resident a Spiriva (medication used to prevent bronchospasms) inhaler to use. The resident did not rinse and spit after the use of the first inhaler nor did she wait in between administering the two inhaled medications. Resident 6's record was reviewed on 4/17/24 at 10:00 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, emphysema (a condition that causes shortness of breath), unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of properly for 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed for medication storage. Finding includes: On 4/18/24 at 10:31 a.m., the medication storage room contained an opened multi-use vial of Aplisol (a clear, colorless solution for injection as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis) solution and had an open date of 2/27/24. On 4/18/24 at 10:33 a.m , the medication storage room contained an opened multi-use vial of flu vaccine solution and had an open date of 11/2/23. During an interview, on 4/18/24 at 10:35 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 9 indicated she was not aware of the facility policy for how long the medication was good for once it was opened but did believe they needed to be discarded. During an interview, on 4/18/24 at 10:51 a.m., the Administrator indicated the medication vials were expired. During an interview, on 4/18/24 at 11:20 a.m., [NAME] President of Clinical Operations indicated both the medications should have been discarded and were expired. On 4/18/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the documentation of wound treatments being completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time) (Resident 25). Findings include: Resident 25's record was reviewed on 4/17/24 at 11:00 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose is too high), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), and end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes), dated 3/21/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient on-duty staff were certified in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR-an emergency life-saving procedure that is done when someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for emergent situations (Residents B and D). Findings include: An anonymous interviewee indicated some residents have had CPR performed on them in the past few months, but no staff in the facility had CPR certification. The previous director had commented to a staff that no one had CPR certification and if something happened the director would be the one to administer CPR. 1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:58 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), pulmonary fibrosis (a lung disease that occurs when lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate treatment who exhibited an increase in behaviors, wandering, and hallucinations for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident B). Finding includes: Review of a facility reported incident, dated [DATE], indicated it was reported to staff that Resident B had made inappropriate comments to a female resident who resides at the facility. Resident B's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 11:00 a.m. The profile indicated the resident diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance (a decline in thinking and problem solving that often makes daily life and independent living difficult along with a person with psychosis had trouble figuring out what is real and what is not), hallucinations ( a perception of having seen, heard, touched, tasted, or smelled something that wasn't actually there), and depression (a group of conditions associated with the elevation or lowering of a person's mood).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure abuse training was completed for 2 of 4 employees reviewed and lacked documentation of ongoing abuse training after a reported abuse allegation. Findings include: On 10/25/23 at 11:15 a.m., during an interview with Employee 5, the employee indicated if she was made aware of an abuse situation between residents, she would immediately report the incident to the head nurse. Maybe the ombudsman if there were signs but was not sure. If she witnessed physical abuse, she would immediately tell someone. The employee indicated she received a little training in abuse when she first started, two months ago but not very much. She indicated she had not received any training in abuse prevention or reporting since she was hired. On 10/25/23 at 11:25a.m.,during an interview with Employee 6, the employee indicated she had worked at the facility for about a month. The employee indicated she did not receive any abuse training when she was hired. She indicated she would remove the residents if she witnessed abuse and call for help and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advanced directive (a written document stating how you want medical decisions to be made if you lose the ability to make them for yourself) wishes were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident D). Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:00 a.m. The profile indicated the resident had admitted to the facility on [DATE], for diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), stage 3 chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys have mild to moderate damage, and they are less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood), and essential hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was cleaned, staff sanitized their hands appropriately, food items were labeled and dated, the cleaning solution in the QUAT buckets tested appropriately, and food temperatures were monitored for 1 of 2 kitchen observations; and the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were prepared in a sanitary manner, and staff wore a beard restraint while preparing food in the kitchen for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene for 1 of 2 dining room service observations and failed to ensure food was covered when transported for 1 of 2 observations of food delivery of hall tray service. Findings include: A1. During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 2/20/23 at 10:15 a.m., the DM washed her hands for less than (<) ten seconds, turned off the faucet with her bare hand, and then began the tour of the kitchen. The flooring throughout the kitchen, dry storage room, walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of a resident was maintained for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident 6). Findings include: During a random observation, on 2/20/23 at 11:32 a.m., Hospice Aide 31 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 13 were observed talking in hallway outside of Resident 6's room. Hospice Aide 31 was observed to enter the resident's room without knocking. CNA 13 was observed to stand in the doorway of the resident's room and continued to converse with the hospice aide. CNA 13 then walked into resident's room without knocking and the two staff continued to carry on a personal conversation while standing over resident in her bed. The conversation was not related to the resident's personal care. During a random observation, on 2/23/23 at 10:06 a.m., two unidentified facility staff were observed to enter the resident's room without knocking. The staff were carrying linens. The staff immediately closed the door behind them.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 of 16 residents (Residents B and 38) for residents observed for call light placement. Findings include: 1. During an initial pool interview on 2/21/23 at 9:23 a.m., Resident B indicated she had fallen many times since residing in the facility to include 3 times that morning. Her roommate had called for staff to come help her as she was unable to reach her call light. She did not routinely need assistance with transfers to and from her wheelchair or to and from the toilet but this week she had been dizzy and her blood pressure was up. Resident B indicated she would usually yell for staff to assist her versus using her call light as she was unable to reach it across the room, and staff did not answer the buzzers very fast. Resident B's call light was observed coiled up and hanging off the railing on the side of the bed. Resident B's record was reviewed on 2/22/23 at 1:33 p.m. Diagnoses on Resident B's profile included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address grievances in a manner which could be tracked for 3 of 3 months reviewed for grievance resolutions of the Resident Council and 2 of 2 residents reviewed for call light response (Residents B and 38). Findings include: Resident Council minutes were provided by the Activity Director (AD) on 2/21/23 at 2:46 p.m. The minutes for the 3 months reviewed indicated the following concerns by the Resident Council: a. Not enough staff for showers. b. Call lights taking too long to be answered by staff. During the Resident Council meeting, on 2/24/23 at 2:00 p.m., the residents indicated the facility had not been fully addressed, resolved, nor acted promptly upon the grievances of not enough staff for showers and call lights taking too long to be answered by staff. During an interview with the Activities Director (AD), on 2/21/23 at 2:50 p.m., she indicated she took minutes for the Resident Council meetings and then spoke with the Social Services Director, who was the facility's grievance officer, the department heads, and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided ongoing communication to residents about their resident rights through the Resident Council and family groups meetings for 3 of 3 months of resident council meetings reviewed. Finding includes: Resident Council minutes were provided by the Activity Director (AD) on 2/21/23 at 2:46 p.m. The Resident Council minutes lacked documentation that resident rights were reviewed during the resident council meetings for 3 of 3 months reviewed. The AD indicated she was unaware the residents' rights should have been reviewed at the meetings with the residents. The residents were provided the residents rights with their admission paperwork to read, and the Resident Rights were posted in the facility, but she was not aware the residents' rights should have been reviewed at resident council meetings. On 2/27/23 at 10:24 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) provided and identified a document as a current facility policy, titled Resident Rights, dated 9/2022. The policy indicated, Employees shall treat all residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities to a dependent 1 of 1 resident reviewed that was incapable of self-initiated activities (Resident 38) and failed to consistently provide evening activities for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for activities (Residents 21, and 19). Findings include, 1. During a random observation on 2/20/23 at 11:53 a.m., Resident 38 was observed lying in bed on her left side facing the doorway to the hall in a fetal position, wearing a hospital gown, and a throw covering her up to her shoulders. The room was dark with the lights off and blinds closed, no television (TV) or radio on. When spoken to the resident opened her eyes but did not engage in conversation. No activity calendar in the room. Random observations of the resident without activity involvement on 2/20/23, a. On 2/20/23 at 12:10 p.m., observation of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 17 opening the resident's door and leaving resident's room. Room observed to be dark with no lights on, blinds closed, no radio or TV for stimulation, resident remained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely assessment, nursing services, documentation, treatment, and diagnostic testing after a weight fell onto her foot in the therapy gym, resulting in dark discoloration and pain to the right foot for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions (Resident 3). Findings include, During an initial pool interview on 2/20/23 at 2:48 p.m., Resident 3 indicated she had a black toe due to an accident the prior week while in the therapy gym when she was working with weights. When staff stood her up to ambulate, a weight rolled off her lap and fell onto her right foot causing bruising and pain to her right 3rd toe. She did not think the toe was broken but did not remember having an x-ray. The toe hurt at times and was tender but did not throb. On 2/21/23 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 3's right foot was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 16 who indicated she was unaware the resident had an injury to her toe. The entire right 3rd toe was observed to have dark purple and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective fall management program by documenting nurse's notes of the fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents B). Findings including: On 2/20/23 at 12:27 a.m., Resident B was observed in the dining room, seated in a Broda chair (tilt in space positioning wheelchair), moving/rocking herself back and forth with her feet. During a random observation on 2/20/23 at 3:01 p.m., Resident B was sitting in a Broda chair leaning over from the waist reaching for personal items. Her room was cluttered with personal items around the bed, between the bed and window, on and under the bed, on the floor, stacked around her side of the room, and partially filled open containers of food and fluids were on the over the bed table and sitting in the trash can. On 2/21/23 at 9:11 a.m., Resident B was observed alone in the activity room, sitting at a small round table with her eyes closed and forehead laying on a newspaper on the table. During an initial pool interview on 2/21/23 at 9:23 a.m., Resident B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-19 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate staffing sheets were posted daily for 3 of 5 days during the recertification survey. Finding includes: During an observation, on 4/15/24 at 12:40 p.m., the staffing sheet posted on the wall across from the nurses' station, was dated correctly, but the posting lacked documentation of the total number and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff. During an observation, on 4/16/24 at 11:08 a.m., the staffing sheet posted on the wall across form the nurses' station, was dated correctly, but the posting lacked documentation of the total number and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff. During an interview, on 4/17/24 at 8:48 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was not aware the staffing sheet posted was not completed accurately. She indicated the night shift nurse was responsible for making sure the sheet was posted and was completed accurately. The staffing sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SMITH, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
SPRUNGER, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
WHEELER, DANEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
ENVIVE NURSING HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022
FLUECKIGER, RUSSELLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/22/2025

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 15%Other / private 21%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$391per resident / day
operating cost
$11,894per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$427per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155468. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next