No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Envive Of Evansville

601 N Boeke Rd, Evansville, IN 47711 · Government - County · 200 certified beds · (812) 476-4912 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 476-4912 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Oct 20242 actual-harm citations$67,886 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $67,886 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-14)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
125 N Weinbach #120 · (800) 769-0045 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
1601 Oak Hill Rd · (812) 477-5245 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2220 E Morgan Ave · (812) 475-6730 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%11.0%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.5%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.3%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.5%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.8%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine42.4%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.721.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.741.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 42.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.8%CMS range 35.0–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.8–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
44.4%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 117.3 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 83 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to Resident C, an aggressive resident, to protect Resident B, a cognitively impaired resident, from being pushed to the floor for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B falling and requiring hospitalization for surgical repair of a right femur fracture. (Resident B, Resident C) Finding includes: On 5/13/24 at 9:33 a.m., during interview, Resident B indicated a man got mad, pushed, and threw her, reached down, and grabbed her hair. Resident B indicated it happened in [name of city]. On 5/13/24 at 10:01 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was moderately impaired,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent accidents for 4 of 8 residents reviewed for falls. Care plans were not updated following each fall, and the clinical record lacked information related to falls resulting in a hip fracture. This deficient practice led to a fall with a fracture requiring hospitalization. (Resident P, Resident Y, Resident F, Resident T) Findings include: 1. On 12/1/23 at 1:31 P.M., Resident P's clinical record was reviewed. admission date was 8/31/23. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/4/23, indicated a severe cognitive impairment and 1 fall with injury since the previous assessment on 9/8/23. A current risk for falls care plan, initiated 9/12/23, included, but was not limited to, the following interventions: Motion sensor in place for safety, dated 11/20/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plans for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for falls and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for weight loss. Care plan interventions were not implemented to prevent falls and for monitoring residents with weight loss. (Resident 6, Resident 67, Resident 92, and Resident 111) Findings include:1. On 3/9/26 at 10:50 A.M., Resident 92 was observed in the common room participating in activities. He was wearing white socks that did not have non-skid bottoms. On 3/12/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident 92's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and muscle weakness. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/8/25, indicated Resident 92 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for toileting, and did not have any falls since the prior assessment. A current risk for falls care plan, initiated 6/12/23, included, but were not limited to, the following interventions:Non-skid socks/footwear on at all times,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medication for 4 of 4 medication carts observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication cart drawers. (Short [NAME] Hall, Pavillion, Pathways, North East Hall)Findings include:1. On 3/9/26 at 8:44 A.M., the Short [NAME] Hall medication cart contained the following loose pills: 1 red circle pill with 11 marking1 yellow circle pill with 75 marking2. On 3/9/26 at 9:05 A.M., the Pavillion medication cart contained the following loose pills: 3 red circle pills with PH32 marking1 large white circle pill with no marking1 orange circle pill with 40 marking1/2 orange oval pill with u marking1 yellow circle pill with L marking1 red oval pill with 5 marking3 medium white circle pills with no marking2 blue circle pills with F5 marking2 green oval pills with V75 marking1 white circle pill with 337 marking1 white circle pill with H marking5 1/2 white oval pills with unidentifiable markings1 white circle pill with APO marking1 white circle pill with LL marking1 white circle pill with 77…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen administration were followed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 41) Finding includes:During an interview and observation on 3/10/26 at 9:45 A.M., Resident 41 indicated she wore oxygen continuously. The oxygen concentrator was set at four liters per minute of oxygen. On 3/10/26 at 2:34 P.M., Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/7/26, indicated Resident 41 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance from staff (staff do more than half of the work) for toileting and bathing, and was on oxygen. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Oxygen at two to three liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously maintain saturation above 90% every shift related to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia; Start date12/30/25. Change humidifier/bubbler monthly and as needed (PRN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's assessment was completed within 30 days following admission for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for physician assessments following admission. (Resident 41 and Resident 32) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 3/10/26 at 9:45 A.M., Resident 41 indicated she had not seen a physician since admission. On 3/10/26 at 2:34 P.M., Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/7/26, indicated Resident 41 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance from staff (staff do more than half of the work) for toileting and bathing, and was on oxygen. The clinical record lacked a physician assessment since admission. During an interview on 3/12/26 at 2:32 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated Resident 41 was on the list to be seen by the physician on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dental status monitored, family was notified of dental changes, and dental services were initiated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dental. (Resident 3) Finding includes: During an interview on 3/9/26 at 11:53 A.M., it was indicated a family member had visited the resident the previous week, and noticed her front tooth missing, and indicated staff were unaware when it had occurred. On 3/11/26 at 9:38 A.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia.The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/2/26, indicated Resident 3 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff (staff do all of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers, and required maximal assistance (staff do more than half of the work) for oral hygiene. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Do not attempt to floss between resident's two front teeth, as these teeth have been fused per recent dental procedure every shift; Start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was accurate and complete for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for significant weight loss. Resident weights were not entered into the clinical record. (Resident 16 and Resident 75)Findings include:1. On 3/11/26 at 1:39 P.M., Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease.The most current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/20/26, indicated Resident 16 was moderately cognitively impaired, required substantial to maximal assistance of staff (staff does more than half of the effort) for toileting and transferring, and had a weight loss of 5 percent (%) or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last six months.Current care plans included, but were not limited to:The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to Parkinson's disease, initiated 1/10/26.Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Weekly weights for four weeks, then monthly, and as needed one time a day every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident M and Resident D) and 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident B and Resident H). Findings include: 1. On 3/12/25 at 10:06 A.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Resident M was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cognitive communication deficit. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/3/25, indicated Resident M was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance from staff (staff do more than half of the work) for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers, and had fallen since the most recent MDS Assessment (1/3/25). A Clinically at Risk Assessment, dated 3/11/25, indicated Resident M had fallen on 2/8/25, 2/25/25, 3/3/25, and 3/10/25. A Fall Risk Assessment, dated 2/26/25, indicated Resident M was alert and oriented x3 (to person, place, and time), and had no falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the plan of care after a resident fell for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 3/12/25 at 12:08 P.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, repeated falls, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/21/25, indicated Resident D was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximal assistance (staff does more than half) with toileting, sit to stand transferring, and lying to sitting bed mobility, and had no falls prior to admission. A current care plan, initiated 1/10/25, indicated Resident D was at risk for falls due to cerebral infarction, neuropathy, and arthritis. Interventions included, but were not limited to: Anti-rollbacks to wheelchair Bed against the wall Bed in lowest position as resident allows Anticipate and meet the resident's needs Call light is within reach Ensure pathways are free of clutter Keep personal items within reach Therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 3/12/25 at 12:08 P.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, repeated falls, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/21/25, indicated Resident D was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximal assistance (staff does more than half) with toileting, sit to stand transferring, and lying to sitting bed mobility, and had no falls prior to admission. A current care plan, initiated 1/10/25, indicated Resident D was at risk for falls due to cerebral infarction, neuropathy, and arthritis. Interventions included, but were not limited to: Anti-rollbacks to wheelchair Bed against the wall Bed in lowest position as resident allows Anticipate and meet the resident's needs Call light is within reach Ensure pathways are free of clutter Keep personal items within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistance at meals or assistance with bathing was provided for 7 of 8 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. (Resident L, Resident S, Resident G, Resident U, Resident R, Resident N, and Resident T) Findings include: 1. During a continuous observation on 1/16/25 beginning at 12:08 P.M., a kitchen staff member was observed delivering trays to the dining room. Staff removed trays from the cart and placed them at the dining tables. Resident L was observed sitting in a recliner facing the dining area. Staff served all the residents at the dining tables, then collected trays as residents were done eating. At 12:41 P.M., Resident L called out to staff for help out of the recliner. At 12:47 P.M., staff transferred Resident L out of the recliner into a wheelchair and wheeled him to the dining table where Resident L ate alone. On 1/21/25 at 12:34 P.M., Resident L's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable temperature for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (North Hall) Finding includes: On 1/17/25 at 10:46 A.M., Resident 118 indicated the food tasted bad and was cold. On 1/21/25 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 35 indicated the food temperature was never what it was supposed to be. Her hot foods were not hot and her cold foods were not cold. On 1/21/25 at 10:53 A.M., Resident S indicated the food was cold when she got it and hot plates were sometimes not used to keep it warm while delivering it to residents. On 1/23/24 at 12:45 P.M. a test tray was obtained. Food temperatures from that meal were: Cheeseburger 100.6 F (Fahrenheit) Sweet potato fries 87 F The food tasted lukewarm and the cheeseburger was observed to be pink in the middle of the meat. On 1/23/24 at 12:50 P.M., the Dietary Supervisor indicated that the burgers used were precooked. On 1/27/25 at 12:31 P.M., the Administrator provided a Food Temperatures policy, dated 2021, that indicated foods sent to the units for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge from Medicare Part A and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident Z and Resident T) Attempts to contact the family were not documented and details of an injury from a fall were not documented accurately. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 1/17/25 at 9:45 A.M., the Administrator indicated Resident Z was scheduled to be discharged home on 1/15/25, but family failed to pick up the resident. The facility had attempted to call the resident's family, but they had not answered the phone. During an interview on 1/17/25 at 9:58 A.M., Resident Z'a family member indicated that Resident Z was at the facility short term for rehab and was due to be discharged soon. They were waiting on a phone call from the Social Services Director (SSD) to set a date for discharge but had not yet heard anything. On 1/17/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident Z's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment during 7 random observations. Odor was present in the facility and puddles of fluid and debris were on the floor. (West Hall, East Hall, 500-hall, Pavilion Dining Room) Findings include: 1. On 1/16/25 at 9:23 A.M., an unattended rolling cart of trash sitting in front of East Hall nurses station had an odor consistent with bowel movement. 2. On 1/16/25 at 9:32 A.M., the 500-hall had a strong putrid smell. 3. On 1/16/25 at 9:35 A.M., the [NAME] Hall was noted to have an odor consistent with bowel movement. 4. On 1/16/25 at 12:37 P.M., the Pavilion dining room floor had a large puddle of fluid and dirty debris observed along the dining room floors. 5. On 1/21/25 at 8:00 A.M., the East Hall was noted to have an odor consistent with urine. 6. On 1/23/25 at 8:10 A.M., the East Hall was noted to have an odor consistent with urine. 7. On 1/23/25 at 10:41 A.M., the [NAME] Hall was noted to have an odor consistent with bowel movement. During an interview on 1/24/25 at 9:19 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice) Forms were provided following the end of Medicare skilled services for 1 of 2 residents who discharged from Medicare services and remained in the facility. (Resident Z) Finding includes: On 1/17/25 at 9:45 A.M., the SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Forms were reviewed. The form indicated Resident Z received Medicare Part A Skilled Services starting 12/4/24. The form indicated the last covered day of Part A services was 1/14/25 and the resident remained in the facility. The form indicated Resident Z did not receive a SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice) Form because she was scheduled to be discharged home on 1/15/25 following the last covered day, but family failed to pick up the resident who remained in the facility. At that time, the Administrator indicated a SNF-ABN had not been issued to the resident. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge was documented in the clinical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident 60) Finding includes: On 1/23/25 at 12:24 P.M., Resident 60's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 60 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/5/24, indicated Resident 60 was moderately cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance from staff (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting and transfers, and was dependent on staff for bathing. A nutrition note created on 1/17/25 at 2:09 P.M., indicated Resident 60 was discharged with return not anticipated. The clinical record, including progress notes, assessments, and documents, lacked information regarding planning of a discharge, documents sent during discharge, where Resident 60 was discharged to, or when discharge occurred. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure social services were provided to meet a resident's mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). (Resident 61) Finding includes: On 1/22/25 at 2:14 P.M., Resident 61's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Wernicke's encephalopathy, alcohol use disorder, non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizures, anxiety, depression, and an unspecified psychiatric disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/20/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, required supervision for all mobility tasks, and received antipsychotics, antianxiety medication, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants during the 7-day look back period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) - 1 tablet at bedtime,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the development and completion of a baseline care plan within forty-eight (48) hours of admission for use of respiratory equipment, tracheostomy, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 277) Finding includes: On 1/21/25 at 11:21 A.M., Resident 277's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 277 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and tracheostomy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was in progress. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Change oxygen tubing monthly and as needed (PRN), one time a day every four weeks on Sunday for Oxygen (O2) use and as needed for soiled or compromised, dated 1/15/25. Change humidifier/bubbler monthly and as needed (PRN), as needed for empty/compromised and change one time a day every four weeks on Sunday for routine oxygen, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated after a fall for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 1/21/25 at 3:19 P.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome, spinal stenosis lumbosacral region, and age-related physical disability. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/13/24, indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired, required substantial to maximal help (staff does more than half) with dressing, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half) with transferring, and had one fall with injury since the prior assessment. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: 1/4 side rails for mobility positioning every day and night shift to aide with bed mobility related to morbid (severe) obesity, dated 11/20/20. A current falls care plan, dated 12/12/17, indicated that Resident 8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 35 and Resident L) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/21/25 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 35's lower extremities were swollen. Resident 35 indicated she was supposed to wear compression stockings to reduce edema but staff had not put them on for her. On 1/21/25 at 1:37 P.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 35 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, renal failure and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 35 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance from staff (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Patient to wear stockings on bilateral lower extremities (Tubigrips size G) for edema reduction and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer development through evaluation of clinical risk factors and implementation of interventions consistent with resident needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for facility acquired pressure injuries. (Resident G) Finding includes: During an anonymous interview, it was indicated Resident G had a decline in mobility since admission and was being left in the same position for long periods of time resulting in skin breakdown. During an observation on 1/23/25 at 8:57 A.M., Resident G was sitting in a recliner in the common area. The chair did not have a pressure reducing cushion for skin breakdown prevention. On 1/22/25 at 1:55 P.M., Resident G's clinical record was reviewed. Resident G was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/24/24, indicated Resident G was severely cognitively impaired, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 1/22/25 at 1:55 P.M., Resident G's clinical record was reviewed. Resident G was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/24/24, indicated Resident G was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance (staff do more than half the work) for bathing and transferring. A fall risk assessment, dated 1/15/25, indicated Resident G was a high risk for falls and had fallen multiple times in the past in the past three months. The care plan included, but was not limited to: I am at risk for falls/injury due to: impaired cognition related to dementia, history of falls, initiated 12/10/24, Interventions included: Assess for pain, Date Initiated: 12/13/24 call light is within reach, Date Initiated: 12/13/24 Ensure pathways are free of clutter, Date Initiated: 12/13/24 Keep personal items within reach, Date Initiated: 12/13/24 Physical therapy to eval (evaluate) and treat as indicated, Date Initiated:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to date oxygen tubing, oxygen concentrator, and suction tubing, and place signs that indicated oxygen was in use. (Resident 277) Finding includes: On 1/21/25 at 9:17 A.M., Resident 277's oxygen tubing, suction tubing, and oxygen concentrator were observed without a label and date. There were no oxygen signs observed that indicated the resident received oxygen. Resident was observed to have a tracheostomy. During the observation of Resident 277's tracheostomy care on 1/22/25 at 8:34 A.M., the obturator for emergency tracheostomy use was not identified in the room. On 1/22/25 at 8:53 A.M., Resident 277's oxygen tubing, suction tubing, and oxygen concentrator were observed without a label and date. There were no oxygen signs observed that indicated the resident received oxygen. On 1/21/25 at 11:21 A.M., Resident 277's clinical record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications by completing pre-dialysis evaluations assessments for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis management. (Resident 35) Finding includes: On 1/21/25 at 1:37 P.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 35 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, renal failure and peripheral vascular disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 35 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance from staff (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Do not obtain blood pressure in the left arm, Start date 10/8/24. Pre-Dialysis assessment to be completed prior to dialysis one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for pre-dialysis assessment; Start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed by a physician since admission for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 35) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/23/25 at 3:00 P.M., Resident 35 indicated she had not been assessed by a physician in the facility since admission. On 1/21/25 at 1:37 P.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 35 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, renal failure and peripheral vascular disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 35 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance from staff (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. The clinical record, including assessments, progress notes, and documents, lacked assessment of Resident 35 by a physician in the facility since admission. During an interview on 1/24/25 at 11:39 A.M., the Administrator indicated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. On 1/22/25 at 10:27 A.M., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stage three pressure ulcer. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/7/24, indicated Resident 13 had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and had two stage three pressure injuries. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Resident requires the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to chronic wound to reduce the risk of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Use personal protective equipment (PPE) precautions when providing prolonged direct resident care, dated 11/14/24. A stage three pressure ulcer to right posterior lateral calf care plan, dated 7/2/24, included an intervention for enhanced barrier precautions. A stage three pressure ulcer to left lateral lower leg care plan, dated 7/2/24, included an intervention for enhanced barrier precautions. A diabetic ulcer to left second toe care plan, dated 12/27/24, included an intervention for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a written notice prior to a room change for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. A resident was moved from the locked dementia unit to a different hall off the unit without prior or documented notification. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an observation on 10/21/24 at 9:00 A.M., Resident B was observed to have a room on the 500 hall. During record review on 10/21/24 at 10:30 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but was not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance and agitation, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Resident B's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/8/24, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment, and resided on the Pavilion (Memory) Unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] in bed 2. Resident B's physician orders included, but were not limited to, resident may reside on locked secured memory unit (dated 6/7/24). Resident B's progress notes included,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported alleged resident to resident abuse to the Facility Administrator and the facility failed to include known relevant information for 1 of 1 allegations of abuse reviewed. Following documented alleged resident to resident abuse, the facility failed to report the allegation to the State Agency for 7 days. The reported incident did not contain all residents involved nor did it contain a detailed description of the incident. (Resident B, Resident K) Finding includes: During a review of State reportable incidents on 10/21/24 at 10:05 A.M., an incident report indicated that there was an allegation of inappropriate contact made by Resident B and an unidentified resident. The incident date and time was reported to be 10/15/24 at 9:01 A.M During a review of the facility's investigation of the incident on 10/21/24 at 2:35 P.M., an undated, untimed, typed document indicated that on 10/15/24 an investigation was initiated based on an allegation that Resident B had touched the breast of a female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. A resident's fall interventions were not in place. (Resident K) Finding includes: On 10/21/24 at 10:11 A.M., Resident K's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and repeated falls. Resident K's most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/21/24, indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired, resident required extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and requried supervision with set up for eating. Resident K had 2 falls since the last assessment, one with injury. Resident K's physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Fall mat at bedside while in bed every shift (ordered 8/1/24). Non-skid mat in front of toilet every shift (ordered 8/1/24). Motion sensor while in bed. Check functioning and placement every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate updated Facility Assessment. The Facility Assessment lacked specific services for residents with Intellectual Disabilities, feeding tubes, tracheotomies and dialysis, and staffing numbers for all departments. Finding includes: On 11/28/23 at 8:14 A.M., the current [name of facility] Facility Assessment, dated 9/12/23, was reviewed. The document indicated staffing numbers varied, and it lacked specific resident population services for residents with Intellectual Disabilities, feeding tubes, dialysis, tracheotomies, and feeding tubes. On 12/5/23 at 9:33 A.M., the Administrator indicated there were no staffing numbers listed in the Facility Assessment, and that the services offered for residents were generalized. She further indicated services such as transportation for dialysis were implied. On 12/5/23 at 11:57 A.M., the Administrator provided a current Facility Assessment policy, dated 6/22. The policy indicated the purpose of the assessment is used to make decisions about direct care staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-06 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit direct care staffing information to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed. (April, May, June, 2023) Finding includes: Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter and 1 Star Staffing Rating was triggered on the CMS PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Data Report for Quarter 3 (April 1 - June 30, 2023). On 11/30/23 at 1:58 P.M., the Administrator indicated that she was aware that staffing information had not been submitted for the third quarter because the facility changed ownership in July and the information did not get submitted. She further indicated that was the reason for the 1 star staffing rating. On 12/4/23 at 1:06 P.M., the Administrator indicated there was no policy for direct care staffing information submission and the facility followed the federal guidelines.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 4 of 4 medication carts observed and 2 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Loose pills were observed in medication carts, and refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out completely in medication rooms. (Southeast, Northeast, West, and Pavilion) Findings include: 1. On 12/5/23 at 8:52 A.M., the following was observed on the Northeast/Southeast Unit: The medication cart was observed with the following loose pills in the drawers: 1 small white round tablet with marking 20/15 1 small white round tablet with marking 12 on one side and T on the other 1 gray oval tablet with marking m10 1 white oval tablet with marking U on one side and 227 on the other At that time, Registered Nurse (RN) 12 indicated that any staff could clean out the medication carts, as it was not assigned to any certain person or shift. The refrigerator temperature logs from November/December in the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperature for 1 of 1 trays tested for food temperature. Finding includes: On 12/1/23 at 8:00 A.M., a test tray was obtained from the Northeast/Southeast Hall. Food temperatures for that meal were as the following: Sausage -114 F Scrambled eggs - 133.7 F Milk - 39 F Orange Juice - 40 F The sausage tasted greasy, and the scramble eggs were bland. On 12/1/23 at 3:06 P.M., during the Resident Council meeting, anonymous residents indicated: The steam table broke last week, and the food has been cold. Thanksgiving dinner was cold. The food is not seasoned well. It is bland. I ask for the salad because I do not like the food. On 12/5/23 at 11:19, an anonymous resident indicated the temperature of the food varied each day. Breakfast was usually hot, but lunch and dinner vary greatly in temperature on various days. On 12/5/23 at 11:32 A.M., an anonymous resident indicated food temperature varied day to day. On 12/1/23 at 6:40 A.M., [NAME] 22 indicated the temperature of food on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed for residents that self administered medications for 2 of 2 random observations. A resident was observed self administering a breathing treatment, and a resident was observed self administering eye drops. (Resident 94, Resident 14) Findings include: 1. On 11/28/23 a 9:54 A.M., Resident 94 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed self administering a breathing treatment. Staff was not observed in the room. On 12/1/23 at 1:17 P.M., Resident 94's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, respiratory failure. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/11/23, indicated no cognitive impairment. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG (milligram)/3ML (milliliter) (Ipratropium-Albuterol) 1 vial inhale orally four times a day, dated 11/3/23. The EMR (electronic medical record) lacked an order for self administration of medications. The EMR lacked a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification to the physician and family representative was completed following a change of resident condition for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. The physician nor family representative was notified following a resident's significant weight loss. (Resident F) Finding includes: On 11/29/23 at 1:21 P.M., Resident F's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, anxiety and depression. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/11/23, indicated a severe cognitive impairment and no swallowing or dental concerns. Weights included, but were not limited to, the following: 10/3/23 112.6 pounds 11/2/23 108.4 pounds 11/6/23 101.4 pounds Resident F experienced a 9.95% weight loss from 10/3/23 through 11/6/23. A current nutritional care plan included, but was not limited to, the following intervention: Monitor/record/report to MD (Medical Doctor) significant weight loss: 3 pounds in 1 week, >5% in 1 month, >7.5% in 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were documented and resolved for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident S) Finding includes: During an anonymous interview on 12/4/23 at 3:05 P.M., it was indicated that an oral grievance was filed on 9/17/23 with Social Service Director (SSD) 7 in regard to Resident S's missing iPad. SSD 7 opened an investigation into the missing iPad, but was unable to locate the device, and indicated the facility would reimburse Resident S for the iPad. Reimbursement was never received. On 12/4/23 at 12:55 P.M., Resident S's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The most recent annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/23/23, indicated Resident S had mild cognitive impairment. An inventory list, dated 1/24/23, indicated Resident S had one iPad/iPod. The clinical record lacked documentation related to the missing item or related grievance. On 12/5/23 at 10:18 A.M., SSD 7 indicated she was informed of Resident S's missing iPad and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge was documented in the clinical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident S) Finding includes: On 12/4/23 at 12:55 P.M., Resident S's clinical record was reviewed. Resident S was discharged to the hospital on 9/13/23 and was anticipated to return. A Discharge return anticipated MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was submitted on 9/13/23. A progress note, dated 9/14/23, indicated unwitnessed fall discussed in IDT (Interdisciplinary Team). Fall with major injury. Sent to ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation) and tx (treatment). A progress note, dated 9/17/23, indicated Discharge Return Anticipated w. (with) ARD (Assessment Reference Date) 9/13/23 Section K completed on this date. A current discharge care plan, revised 8/10/23, indicated my d/c (discharge) plans are to stay here at [name of facility] for long term care. The clinical record lacked any documentation in regard to the outcome of Resident S…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for MDS discrepancy. (Resident 76, Resident 16) Findings include: 1. On 11/29/23 at 2:32 P.M., Resident 76's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, personal history of transient ischemic attack, vascular dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. The most recent quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/13/23, indicated Resident 76 was unable to be assessed for cognitive function due to rarely or never being understood and received an anticoagulant during the 7 day look back period (10/7/23 - 10/13/23). Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Aspirin (an antiplatelet) Tablet - Give 81 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day, dated 5/18/21. Physician orders lacked an order for an anticoagulant medication during the lookback period. 2. On 12/4/23 at 10:41 A.M., Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed for newly admitted residents for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident P, Resident T) 1. On 12/1/23 at 1:31 P.M., Resident P's clinical record was reviewed. admission date was 8/31/23. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, and anxiety. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/4/23, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and one (1) fall with injury since the previous assessment on 9/8/23. A current risk for falls care plan was initiated 9/12/23. A Falls Risk Assessment was completed 8/31/23 that indicated high fall risk. The EMR (electronic medical record) lacked a baseline care plan related to falls. On 12/4/23 at 1:55 P.M., a handwritten 48-hour care plan for baseline functional abilities was provided, with effective date 9/1/23. The form lacked information related to risk for falls. The form was not in the resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a chronic wound and report changes to the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 12/1/23 at 8:42 A.M., Resident B was observed to have a wound on her right shin. It had a thick crusty surface, was raised in the middle, and was red around the edges. At that time, the DON (Director of Nursing) measured the wound at 6cm (centimeters) x (by) 6cm. On 12/1/23 at 1:04 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, neoplasm of uncertain behavior of skin. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/10/23, indicated the resident was not cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of 1 staff for transfers and toileting, and had no skin conditions. Physician orders included, but was not limited to: Please complete weekly skin assessment under assessment tab one time a day every Tue, dated 10/17/2023. A current ADL (activities of daily living) care plan, revised 9/14/22, indicated I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to date tubing and label humidification bottles, and lacked a care plan for oxygen for a resident on oxygen. (Resident 30, Resident 271, Resident 83) Findings include: 1. On 11/28/23 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 30 was observed in his room sitting in a wheelchair wearing oxygen (O2) at 2 L (liters) via nasal cannula. There were no visible dates on the tubing, concentrator, and humidification bottle. On 11/29/23 at 1:14 P.M., Resident 30 was observed sitting in a wheelchair wearing portable O2 at 2 L. The tubing lacked a dated label. On 11/29/23 at 12:54 P.M., Resident 30's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Pulmonary Fibrosis and dyspnea unspecified. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/4/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions related to kitchen equipment and undated and expired dry goods for 2 of 2 observations. Findings include: The kitchen tour occurred between 8:51 A.M. and 11:40 A.M. on 11/27/23. During that time, the following was observed: In the dry storage area: 1 large can of spaghetti sauce dented 1 unlabeled can White powder on cans of apricot preserve Flour not dated when opened Bins not labeled Open box of Cheez-its not dated Open box of Fudge Rounds and [NAME] Buddies not dated when opened 3 bags of fried crisp onions with best by date of [DATE] 3 bag of blue diamond almond sliced with best by June 13 23 3 bags of almonds with best by date of April 13 23 Bag of elbow macaroni open not dated Bag of open egg noodles not dated Box of powdered sugar not dated Brown sugar opened and not dated Box of marshmallows with used by date of May 19 23 Bag of shredded coconut wrapped unable to read open date Hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of protective equipment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for transmission based precautions and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident 99, Resident 10) Findings include: 1. On 12/04/23 at 3:37 P.M ., Social Services Director (SSD) 7 was observed coming out Resident 10's room with all of her PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) on and removed it in the hallway. The trash cans and hazardous waste containers were also observed in the hallway outside of the residents room. On 12/4/23 at 3:39 P.M., SSD 7 indicted that she was trained to remove the PPE outside the room. On 12/4/23 at 3:42 P.M., CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) 31 was observed coming out of Resident 10's room after removing her PPE inside the room with her used PPE in a plastic trash bag, and disposed of the bag in the containers outside of the room. On 12/4/23 at 3:45 P.M., CNA 31 indicated PPE equipment should be removed in the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$67,886 in federal fines across 9 penalties.

  • $8,970 — penalty dated 2024-05-14
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $12,703 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $8,469 — penalty dated 2023-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENVIVE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
NBH BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
BORNE-BAUMAN, CANDICEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
FLUECKIGER, RUSSELLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
LEHMAN, SCOTTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
MACKLIN, LARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
MCINTIRE, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
SMITH, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
SPRUNGER, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
WHEELER, DANEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
GOOD SAM OPCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
LT CARE ACQUISITION CORPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SCHULTZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
TREVINO, TARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
BLUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
ENVIVE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
EVANSVILLE PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
FIRST BANK OF BERNEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 6%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,523per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$353per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155716. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next