Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 164.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure physicians orders were obtained and clarified upon readmission from the hospital for 2 (#64, and #500) of 4 (#49, #64, #149, and #500) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 03/16/2024 at 9:00 p.m., when Resident #500 returned to the facility without hospital discharge orders. Resident #500 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with symptoms including facial edema, tongue swelling, disoriented, and difficulty breathing. The hospital diagnoses was anaphylactic allergic reaction to Amiodarone. The facility failed to obtain records and orders from the hospital upon readmission on [DATE] and Amiodarone 200 mg BID remained on the eMAR. On 03/18/2024 at 8:00 a.m., S20LPN administered Amiodarone to Resident #500. S1ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 03/19/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their dietary supplements with each meal for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #1Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Quadriplegia, Unspecified Level of Spinal Cord Injury, and Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of Resident #1's most recent MDS with an ARD of 03/22/2026, revealed a BIMS of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:Start date 03/16/2026- Magic cup with meals. Review of Resident #1's most recent Registered Dietician Assessment Summary revealed, in part, the following:Current Diet Order: NAS (No Added Salt) diet. Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency, double portion meats. Magic cup with meals three times a day. Liquid protein three times a day. House supplement four times a day.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. There were 166 residents in the facility who ate food from the kitchen.Findings:On 03/23/2026 at 8:50 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S2DM, who confirmed the following observations:Freezer:The following items were observed in unsealed bags in open cardboard boxes:-1 10 pound bag of fully cooked sausage patties-1.2 ounce plastic bag of cheese and garlic biscuit dough-1.5 pound plastic bag of diced ham-10.35 pound plastic bag of fully cooked chicken breast patties-10 pound plastic bag of fish fingers-1 pound bag of egg rollsOn 03/23/26 at 8:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DM. S2DM confirmed the aforementioned items were open, and not sealed. S2DM stated all foods stored in the freezer should have been sealed and not left open to air.On 03/24/2026 at 4:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM was notified of the aforementioned findings. S1ADM stated opened food items should have been sealed and not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's person centered plan of care for 1 (#114) of 7 sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #114's shrinker sock was applied to his right below the knee amputation (BKA) as identified in his plan of care.Review of Resident #114's Clinical Record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below Knee. Review of Resident #114's Annual MDS with ARD of 02/04/2026 revealed a BIMS of 06, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #114's current Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part:Shrinker sock to be applied to right BKA anytime prosthetic leg and silicone liner with screw is removed. On 03/23/2026 at 9:45 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #114. He was lying in bed with no shrinker sock in place to right BKA with a sign above his bed, stating gray shrinker sock to be worn…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#59) of 3 residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to shampoo Resident #59's hair.Findings:Review of Resident #59's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Anxiety Disorder, Idiopathic Progressive Neuropathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation, and Acute on Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxemia. Review of Resident #59's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/19/2026 revealed she had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #59's Care Plan revealed the following, in part:Problem: The resident requires staff assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 (#162) of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration with an effective date of 10/04/2024, revealed the following, in part:Policy: Nursing personnel shall ensure the safe and effective administration of medications.Procedure:1. Medication Administration:g. Administer the medication as ordered .4. Missing Medication:a. Notify the Pharmacy immediately to fill the order during regular pharmacy hours. After hours, retrieve the medication from the emergency medication kit. Review of Resident #162's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#135) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care to a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy & Procedure dated 04/2024, revealed the following, in part: Procedure:1. EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: b. Indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with and MDRO. ii. Indwelling medical device examples include urinary catheters4. For residents for whom EBP are indicated, EBP is employed when performing the following high-contact resident care activities: b. Providing hygiene g. Device care or use (urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure staff with facial hair wore a beard restraint while preparing to serve food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 155 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medical Nutrition Therapy and Food Systems Management with a revision date of 10/2018 revealed the following, in part: 3. Proper Work Attire b. The food service employee observes the following dress standards: i. Employees with facial hair wear a beard restraint. An observation was made in the facility's kitchen on 02/10/2025 at 11:26 a.m. The dietary staff were preparing to serve lunch. There were three male dietary aides with beards preparing drinks and placing lids on the cups. None of the three male dietary aides had on a facial hair restraint. An interview was conducted with S5DM on 02/11/2025 at 11:33 a.m. She confirmed the male…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed within 14 days of a resident admitted to hospice for 1 (#136) of 3 (#76, #136, and #159) sampled residents who received hospice services. Findings: Review of Resident #136's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #136's Physicians Orders revealed Resident #136 was admitted to Hospice on 04/30/2024. Review of Resident #136's MDS assessments from 04/30/2024 to present revealed no Significant Change MDS was submitted to reflect Hospice services were provided. On 02/12/2025 at 10:54 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3MDS. She stated an admission to Hospice services required a Significant Change MDS assessment. She reviewed Resident #136's MDS assessments and confirmed a Significant Change MDS was not completed after being admitted to Hospice on 04/30/2024 and should have. On 02/12/2025 at 2:04 p.m., an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status by failing to ensure: 1.Discharge dispositions were accurately coded for 1 (#161) of 4 (#159, #161, #312, and #412) discharged resident records reviewed; and 2. Hospice services were accurately coded for 1 (#136) of 3 (#76, #136 and #159) residents reviewed who received hospice services. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Policy and Procedure dated 06/25/2015 revealed the following, in part: Policy: All Minimum Data Set (MDS) are to be completed and transmitted according to the most current Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. 1. Resident #161 Review of Resident #161's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 10/16/2024 and a discharge date of 11/12/2024. Further review of the Clinical Record revealed she was a planned discharge home with Home Health Services. Review of Resident #161's Discharge MDS assessment with an ARD of 11/12/2024 revealed her discharge from the facility was unplanned. An interview was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 3 (Cart A, Cart B, and Cart C) medication carts observed. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Insulin vials were labeled with the date opened and discarded 28 days after the date opened; and 2. Medications were discarded by their expiration date. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Purpose: To define responsibility and delineate processes for safe administration of medications by nursing personnel. Procedure: 7. Multi-dose vials: b. All multi-dose vials shall be labeled with the initials of the person opening the vial and an expiration date that is 28 days after opening. c. Opened multi-dose vials that lack dates or initials shall be discarded. Cart A An observation was made of Cart A on [DATE] at 2:24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,790 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $26,790 — penalty dated 2024-03-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA