Pointe Coupee Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 27.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 97.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, and #R2) residents reviewed for professional standards. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff:1.Accurately transcribed Resident #1's Lantus insulin order;2. Clarified blood glucose monitoring orders with the physician for Resident #1, a Diabetic resident receiving Insulin; and3. Obtained a blood glucose level when Resident #1 experienced a change in condition.This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation on 08/05/2025 when Resident #1's insulin order was inaccurately transcribed into his electronic medical record and MAR. Resident #1 admitted to the facility from a local hospital on [DATE] with an order for Lantus 100 unit/mL inject 5 units subcutaneously daily. S4LPN transcribed the order into Resident #1's electronic medical record and MAR as Lantus 100 unit/mL inject 30 units subcutaneously daily. S4LPN did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error by failing to transcribe the accurate insulin order in the electronic medical record for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed receiving insulin.This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation on the morning of 08/06/2025 when Resident #1, a Diabetic resident, began receiving the incorrect dose of Lantus 100 unit/mL insulin. Resident #1 admitted to the facility from a local hospital on [DATE] with an order for Lantus 100 unit/mL inject 5 units subcutaneously daily. S4LPN transcribed the order into Resident #1's electronic medical record as Lantus 100 unit/mL inject 30 units subcutaneously daily. From 08/06/2025 through 08/11/2025, Resident #1 received 30 units of Lantus 100 unit/mL subcutaneously daily. On the afternoon of 08/11/2025, Resident #1 experienced a hypoglycemic episode, with a blood glucose level of 23 mg/dL. Resident #1 was administered 25 grams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hearing impaired resident was provided with an alternate means of communication for 1 (#97) of 2 (#36 and #97)hearing impaired residents reviewed in the sample. Review of the facility Policy, dated 01/23/2023, Translation/Interpreting Services Policy and Procedure for Hearing and Visually Impaired and Foreign Language Speaking Residents revealed the following, in part: Purpose: to ensure the facility provides appropriate auxiliary aids and services when necessary to ensure effective communication for residents with disabilities who have a hearing impairment, reasonable accommodations must be provided. Policy: 1. The facility will provide services and communication devices in a private setting that are easily accessible to residents and are adapted to accommodate residents' preferences, needs, and abilities, such as hearing loss, vision loss, and/ or speak a foreign language. The types of services and communication devices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified of significant changes that required treatment to be altered for 1(#76) of 3 (#54, #76, and #77) residents reviewed for Orthopedic braces. The facility failed to ensure: 1. The treating physician was notified when Resident #76 constantly removed an ordered LUE immobilizer brace due to a Left Distal Humerus Fracture; and 2. The physician was notified when Resident #76 showed signs of pain when receiving ADL care. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 09/13/2024 for Resident #76, a severely cognitively impaired resident, removed an immobilizing splint ordered for treatment of a Left Humerus Fracture and the nursing staff did not reapply it from 09/13/2024 through present. CNA's observed Resident #76 exhibited signs of pain when the left arm was manipulated without the immobilizer. The treating physician was not notified Resident #76 removed the left immobilizing splint and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (#76 and #86) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan by failing to ensure: 1. Resident #76's left upper extremity immobilizing splint was applied according to the Physicians order; and 2. Resident #76 and Resident #86 attended follow up care physician's appointments as ordered This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 09/13/2024 for Resident #76, a severely cognitively impaired resident, when the resident removed an immobilizing splint ordered for treatment of a Left Humerus Fracture and the nursing staff did not reapply it. From 09/13/2024 through present, nursing staff did not implement the physician's order which caused the fractured left arm to remain mobile. On 11/01/2024, the facility failed to ensure Resident #76 attended the Orthopedics' follow up appointment for reassessment of the fracture. Staff interviews…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility to meet professional standards of quality. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered safely by leaving medications at bed side for 1 (#81) of 22 residents observed in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #81's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #81's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/30/2024 revealed she had a BIMS of 13, indicating she was cognitively intact. On 12/02/2024 at 9:00 a.m., an observation was conducted of a cup of medications noted at Resident #81's bed side. On 12/02/2024 at 10:00 a.m. an interview was conducted with S12LPN. She stated she left Resident #81's medications at bed side and should not have. S12LPN stated Resident #81 liked to take her medications at 10:00 a.m. and she had always left the medications at bedside. On 12/05/2024 at 2:04 p.m., an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management for a resident following diagnosis of the Left Humerus Fracture at the Elbow consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and professional standards of practice for 1 (#76) of 2 (#76 and #86) residents reviewed for pain. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 09/16/2024 when Resident #76, a severely cognitively impaired resident, received her last dose of pain medication following a fall that resulted in a Left Humerus Fracture at the Elbow. Resident #76 was treated by an Orthopedic Specialist on 10/01/2024 and returned with an order to wear an immobilizing brace to the LUE at all times to prevent further injury and to decrease pain. Staff did not apply Resident #76's immobilizing splint to her LUE from 10/02/2024 through present. Staff observed Resident #76 exhibited signs of pain when they manipulated her LUE without the immobilizing splint in place while providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain each resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population by failing to respond to a resident's requests for assistance with ADLs timely for 1 (#59) of 22 residents reviewed in the final sample. Review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 3 revealed a one-star staffing rating. Review of the facility's Daily Assignment Sheet revealed the facility required 8 regularly staffed CNA's assigned per shift. Review of the facility's census dated 12/01/2024 revealed there was a total census of ninety-two residents and four hallways. Further review revealed there were twelve residents residing on Hall B. Review of the facility's Daily Assignment Sheet dated 12/03/2024 revealed the following, in part: 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.: S4CNA - Hall B Further review revealed no other staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of a resident's choice to participate in activities for 1 (#61) of 2 (#22 and #61) residents reviewed for self-determination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 92 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident's Rights, undated, revealed, in part, the following: 20. Take part in various activities of the nursing facility. Review of Resident #61's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Paraplegia; History of Falling; Lack of Coordination; Muscle Wasting and Atrophy; Generalized Muscle Weakness; and Difficulty in Walking. Review of Resident #61's most recent Minimum Data Set, with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/09/2024, indicated resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 15, which indicated resident was cognitively intact. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's mattress in a sanitary manner for 1 (#4) of 2 (#4 and #36) residents reviewed for environment in the final sample. Review of the facility's Maintenance Log dated October 2024 through December 2024 revealed no entries for Resident #4's mattress. Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 01/06/2020. Review of Resident #4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/20/2024 revealed she was always incontinent of bladder. An observation was made of Resident #4's room on 12/02/2024 at 1:40 p.m. There was a mattress on the bed frame with a cloth covering, which contained multiple brown rings. There was a strong urine odor in the room. An interview was conducted with S4CNA on 12/02/2024 at 12:05 p.m. S4CNA stated Resident #4's mattress was replaced today. She stated the room has had a strong urine odor for months. She confirmed the mattress had multiple dried urine rings on it and it smelled like urine. She stated the mattress had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's MDS assessment accurately reflected the PASARR status for 1 (#59) of 2 (#59 and #61) residents reviewed with Level II PASARRs. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Policy and Procedure dated 06/25/2015 revealed the following, in part: Policy: All MDS are to be completed and transmitted according to the most current Resident Assessment Instrument manual. Review of Resident #59's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 04/05/2024 and diagnoses, which included Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #59's BHSF Form 142 revealed she was approved for admission by Level II Authority with an effective period of 02/02/2024 through 01/31/2025. Review of Resident #59's OBH-PASARR Level II Evaluation Summary & Determination Notice revealed the following, in part: Evaluation Placement Recommendations - The individual has a serious mental illness and is recommended nursing home admission. Review of Resident #59's admission MDS with an ARD of 04/11/2024 revealed the following,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility staff failed to provide hair hygiene for 1 (Resident # 46) of 2 (#46 and #63) residents sampled for ADL's. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility who required assistance with ADL's. Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Difficulty in Walking, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy of Right Upper Arm and Left Upper Arm, Lack of Coordination, and Dementia. Review of Resident #46's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/23/2024 revealed Resident #46 had a BIMS of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, did not reject care, and required max assistance for personal hygiene. Review of ADL documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA