Colonial Oaks Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 90.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food from the facility's kitchen was palatable in flavor as required. Findings:Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/18/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 05/03/2026 at 10:05AM, Resident #1 indicated the facility's food was terrible. Resident #1 further indicated the facility's food was cooked badly and not seasoned. In an interview on 05/05/2026 at 1:27PM, Resident #1 indicated the Brussel sprouts served for dinner on 05/04/2026 were mushy and not good. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #30 had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated Resident #30 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 05/03/2026 at 9:30AM, Resident #30 indicated the facility's food tasted horrible. In an interview on 05/04/2026 at 8:26AM, Resident #30 indicated she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an ordered pain medication was available for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for medication availability. Findings:Review of Resident #7's May 2026 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order to administer Resident #7 oxycodone hydrochloride (HCI) (a type of medication used to treat pain) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every 4 hours as needed for pain. In an interview on 05/04/2026 at 2:00PM, Resident #7 indicated she requested pain medication for pain this morning. Further, Resident #7 indicated the nurse (S3Licensed Practical Nurse) informed her the facility did not have oxycodone 5 mg po as per the doctor's order. Review of Resident #7's May 2026 electronic medication administration record (EMAR) revealed, in part, Resident #7 had not been administered oxycodone HCI 5 mg by mouth on 05/04/2026.Observation on 05/04/2026 at 2:01PM revealed there was no oxycodone HCI 5mg tablets available on the medication cart for Resident #7.In an interview on 05/04/2026 at 2:02PM, S3Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the advance prepared menus, approved by the facility's dietician, were followed for 3 (05/03/2026, 05/04/2026, 05/05/2026) of 3 days of observation of the facility's served meals. Findings:Review of the facility's dietician approved Week 1 2026 Spring/Summer Menu revealed, in part, on 05/03/2026, the facility was to serve broccoli rice casserole for lunch. Further review revealed on 05/04/2026, the facility was to serve turkey tetrazzini for dinner. Further revealed, on 05/05/2026, the facility was to serve fried chicken and a chocolate cherry bar for lunch. In an interview on 05/03/2026 at 9:44AM, Resident #28 indicated the facility always served the same food. In an interview 05/03/2026 9:56AM, Resident #70 indicated the facility's food was repetitive and the facility always served them rice. Observation of lunch on 05/03/2026 at 12:27PM revealed the facility's residents were served, in part, white rice instead of the broccoli rice casserole that was listed on the above mentioned dietician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility nursing staff failed to document assistance provided with bathing, oral care, and eating for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living care provided. Findings:Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/09/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurological disorder that affects movement) and required substantial/maximum assistance from staff with bathing, oral hygiene, and eating. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed, in part, Resident #1 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living and staff were to assist Resident #1 with bathing, hygiene, and eating. Further review revealed Resident #1 had essential tremors (involuntary shaking in the hands) and staff were to monitor and document Resident #1's ability to perform Activities of Daily Living. Review of Resident #1's December 2025 Documentation Survey Report v2 revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence staff provided bathing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's dishwasher and 3 compartment sink parameters were maintained to correctly sanitize dinnerware. Findings: Observation on 04/08/2025 at 8:10AM revealed after multiple attempts the dishwasher temperature gauge read 90 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). In an interview on 04/08/2025 at 8:11AM, S10Culinary Aide (CA) indicated the dishwasher's water wash temperature was 90°F. S10CA further indicated they were using a sanitizer for the dinnerware. In an interview on 04/08/2025 at 8:12AM, S9Dietary Manager (DM) indicated the dish machine's water temperature was not getting to 150°F as it should. S9DM further indicated the facility needed to install a hot water heater to raise the dishwasher water temperatures, and S9DM was not sure how many parts per million (PPM) the sanitizer needed to be in order to sanitize the dinnerware. S9DM further indicated according to the Dishwasher Temperature Log, the wash temperature should be 150°F and the rinse temperature should be 180°F. Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physical chart did not contain conflicting advance directive documents for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 (Resident #11, Resident #71, Resident #134) sampled residents investigated for advanced directives. Findings: Review of the facility's Advance Directive policy and procedure dated [DATE] revealed, in part, previously revised advanced directives should be removed from a resident's chart and placed in the resident's file in medical records. Further review revealed only the active advanced directive should remain on the chart. Review of Resident #11's physical chart revealed, in part, a Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (LaPOST) form dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #11 was a full code status (a healthcare provider should perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] [an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing to keep blood circulating] if a resident's heart stopped beating or a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the shower room floors were maintained in a clean manner for 2 (Shower room e, Shower room f) of 3 (Shower room d, Shower room e, Shower room f) shower rooms observed for cleanliness. Findings: In an interview on 04/06/2025 at 9:54AM, Resident #44 indicated the shower room was dirty. Observation of Shower room f on 04/06/2025 at 10:06AM revealed the floors had a buildup of an unknown black substance between the floor tiles throughout the floor of Shower room f. Observation of Shower room e on 04/06/2025 at 10:08AM revealed the floors had a buildup of an unknown black substance between the floor tiles throughout the floor of Shower room e. In an interview on 04/06/2025 at 10:12AM, S13Certified Nursing Assistant indicated the floors in Shower rooms e and f were dirty and needed to be cleaned. In an interview on 04/07/2025 at 10:27AM, S14Housekeeping Supervisor confirmed Shower room e and Shower room f had a buildup of an unknown black substance between the floor tiles throughout the floors and needed to be cleaned. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff answered call bells to assist residents in a timely manner for 3 (Resident #7, Resident #48, Resident #333) of 24 (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #14, Resident #20, Resident #21, Resident #33, Resident #35, Resident #37, Resident #41, Resident #43, Resident #46, Resident #47, Resident #48, Resident #51, Resident #52, Resident #56, Resident #65, Resident #76, Resident #333) initial pool residents reviewed for call bell use. Findings: Resident #333 Review of Resident #333's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #333's cognition was moderately impaired and Resident #333 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. In an interview on 04/06/2025 at 9:40AM, Resident #333 indicated on 04/05/2025 she had to wait approximately 6 hours, from 6:00AM to 12:00 PM, to receive incontinence care from staff. Resident #333 further indicated the wait time for staff assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a medication cart was secured while unattended for 1 (Medication Cart a) of 4 (Mediation Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d) medication carts observed. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy and procedure dated 10/04/2024 revealed, in part, medications must be secured at all times and not left unattended. Further review revealed, medication cart drawers should be locked when not in use. Observation on 04/06/2025 at 9:22AM revealed, Medication Cart a was left unlocked and unattended by S8Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). In an interview on 04/06/2025 at 9:35AM, S8LPN indicated a medication cart should always be locked if unattended. In an interview on 04/08/2025 at 2:45PM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed all medication carts should have been locked while unattended. In an interview on 04/08/2025 at 2:50PM, S1Administrator confirmed medication carts should have been locked if left unattended.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure oxygen personal care items were contained in plastic bags when not in use for 2 ( Resident #133, Resident #135) of 6 (Resident #40, Resident #50, Resident #133, Resident #134, Resident #155, Resident #185) sampled residents investigated for oxygen use. Findings: Resident #133 Review of the facility's BIPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) and CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) Machine Cleaning Policy and Procedure dated 11/04/2014 revealed, in part, store mouthpiece, and mask in plastic bag when not in use. Review of Resident #133's Physician's Orders dated April 2025 revealed, in part, Resident #133 was on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) nightly at bedtime. Observation on 04/06/2025 at 10:32AM revealed Resident #133's CPAP mask and tubing was on the nightstand and was not contained in a plastic bag. Observation on 04/06/2025 at 3:42PM revealed Resident #133's CPAP mask and tubing was on the nightstand and not contained in a plastic bag. In an interview on 04/06/2025 at 3:46PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA