No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Jefferson Healthcare Center

2200 Jefferson Hwy, Jefferson, LA 70121 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 222 certified beds · (504) 837-3144 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (504) 837-3144 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2023Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1514 Jefferson Hwy · (504) 842-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1801 Jefferson Hwy · (504) 324-6632 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3001 Jefferson Hwy · (504) 437-0540 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.6%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.3%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.0%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.3%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%5.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.4%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.4%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine41.7%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.1%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%14.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.292.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.732.741.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.7%CMS range 27.3–60.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.0–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.8–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.16
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
62.4%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 222 beds and averages 162.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-08)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident/responsible party was notified in advance of a care planning conference to enable resident to participate in care plan meeting for 1 (Resident #89) of 32 sample resident records reviewed for care plans.Findings:Review of Resident #89's medical records revealed, in part, Resident #89 had an initial admit date of 10/11/2024 and was identified in the medical record as being his own responsible party. Further review revealed, Resident #89 had the following diagnoses: Type II Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of Resident #89's Quarterly Minimum Data Se) with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/26/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #89 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating Resident #89 was cognitively intact.In an interview on 04/06/2026 at 12:43PM, Resident #89 indicated he was responsible for his own care. Resident #89 further indicated he was not aware of, and he had not been invited by the facility, to a meeting to discuss his plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure annual influenza and pneumococcal immunizations were administered after consent was obtained for 2 (Resident #14, Resident #85) of 5 sampled residents investigated for immunization requirements. Findings:Review of the facility's Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations policy and procedure, dated 09/18/2017, revealed, in part, all residents shall be offered, and if consented, administered the annual influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Further review revealed this information shall be documented in the resident's electronic immunization record. On 04/07/2026 at 12:15PM, S3Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (ADON/IP) was presented with a request for all Influenza and Pneumococcal immunization consents and administration records for Resident #14 and Resident #85. Resident #14Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/26/2026 revealed, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01, which indicated Resident #14 was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided assistance with dressing/changing clothes for 1(Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living needs. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #3 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/01/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #3 required substantial/maximal assistance with upper and lower body dressing. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 9:15AM revealed Resident #3 was lying in bed wearing a hospital gown with a red stain noted to left upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent in mechanical lift operational procedures for 9(S5Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] Supervisor, S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S15CNA, S16CNA, S17CNA, S18CNA, S19CNA) of 14 staff members investigated for staff competency with the operation of the facility's mechanical lift.Findings:Review of the facility's Transferring a Resident policy/procedure, dated 07/02/2019, revealed, in part, staff were to follow the manufacture's guidelines for mechanical lift transfer procedures.Review of the facility's mechanical lift Operating Manual, dated 03/2007, revealed, in part, the mechanical lift transfer procedure (from a bed) specified that the caster brakes of the mechanical lift should be left unlocked when a resident was raised from the bed during transfer. Further review revealed, leaving the mechanical lift caster brakes unlocked would allow the mechanical lift to walk forward to center itself over the resident's center of gravity as it was raised. Further review revealed, this procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified of a resident's elevated blood glucose level for 1 (Resident #114) of 5 (Resident #36, Resident #67, Resident #104, Resident #105, Resident #114) sampled residents investigated for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #114's April 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order to administer Resident #114's Humalog Insulin Pen (a medication used to help control blood glucose levels) 100 units/milliliters as per a sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. Further review revealed, if Resident #114's blood glucose level was between [PHONE NUMBER] mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter), Resident #114's physician should be called. Review of Resident #114's April 2025 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed, in part: On 04/07/2025 at 4:00PM, Resident #114's blood glucose level was 433 mg/dL; On 04/11/2025 at 4:00PM, Resident #114's blood glucose level was 360 mg/dL; On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to ensure daily wound care was provided for a resident with unhealed pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #14) of 1 (Resident #14) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of the May 2023 Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 46, Part XLVII revealed, in part: the registered nurse retained the accountability for the total nursing care of the individual and was responsible for and accountable to each consumer of nursing care for the quality of nursing care he or she received, regardless of whether the care was provided solely by the registered nurse or by the registered nurse in conjunction with other licensed or unlicensed assistive personnel. Further review revealed, in part, the plan for nursing care was implemented according to the following criteria: nursing actions were consistent with the plan for nursing care and nursing actions were documented by written records. Review of the facility's Wound Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a system to accurately reconcile controlled substances for 5 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e) of 5 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e) medication carts reviewed for the reconciliation documentation of controlled substances. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy and procedure dated 10/04/2024 revealed, in part, at change of shift, the off going and oncoming nurses shall count the medications in the narcotic cabinet for any discrepancies utilizing the controlled drug package inventory form. Review of the facility's undated Controlled Drug Count Record and Package Inventory form revealed, in part, a signature acknowledged the nurse had counted the controlled drugs and had found the quantity of each medication was in agreement with the quantity stated on the Controlled Dug Administration Record. Further review revealed the nurse should have signed and had another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required members of the Quality Assessment and Assurance committee met at least quarterly. Findings: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, the facility's Quality Assurance committee would meet at least quarterly to identify issues and develop, implement, and/or oversee implementation of appropriate plans of correction for identified quality deficiencies. Further review revealed the Quality Assurance committee would consist of the Medical Director (MD), the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON) and 3 other staff members designated by the facility. Review of the facility's Quarterly Quality Assurance (QQA) meeting minutes on 07/26/2024 revealed the sign-in sheet documented the staff that participated in the QQA meeting, validated by signatures, included the DON, the Administrator, Dietary Manager, and MD. Further review revealed no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, additional staff were present for the 07/26/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to access and manage their funds at all times for 3 (Resident #17, Resident #56, Resident #67) of 3 (Resident #17, Resident #56, and Resident #67) sampled residents reviewed for personal funds. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund policy and procedure, undated, revealed, in part, residents or family members may deposit funds into the resident trust fund account for resident's personal spending. Further review revealed just like a bank the facility had banking hours, and to please see the facility business office specialist for a listing of the resident's banking hours. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund Policy and Procedure, effective date of 01/23/2023, revealed, in part, residents who have authorized the facility to manage their personal funds must have reasonable access to those funds. Further review revealed the facility was expected to maintain amounts of petty cash on hand that may be required by the residents, and a request for fifty dollars or less would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a facility initiated discharge with Medicare Part A skilled services days remaining was provided with a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for 1 (Resident #227) of 3 (Resident #34, Resident #68, Resident #227) sampled residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification requirements. Findings: Review of Resident #227's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Notification Review revealed, in part, Resident #227 started Medicare Part A skilled services on 09/23/024 with the last covered day of Part A services on 11/03/2024. Further review revealed the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. Review of Resident #227's Social Service note dated 11/04/2024 revealed, in part, social services issued a local coverage of determination (LCD) for skilled services on 11/03/2024 with discharge home on [DATE]. Further review revealed no documented evidence a Notice of Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in a resident's room for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 (Resident #36) sampled residents investigated for environment. Findings: Review of Housekeeper Aide Job Description, dated 04/15/2015, revealed, in part, the primary purpose of the Housekeeper Aide was to perform the day-to day activities of the housekeeping department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards. Further review revealed the housekeeper aide was responsible for cleaning walls by washing, wiping, dusting, spot cleaning, disinfecting, and deodorizing. Observation on 04/28/2025 at 10:25AM of Resident #36's room, revealed there was an unknown dried brown substance on two areas of the wall next to Resident #36's bed. Observation on 04/29/2025 at 10:31AM of Resident #36's room, revealed there was an unknown dried brown substance on two areas of the wall next to Resident #36's bed. Observation on 04/30/2035 at 10:42AM of Resident #36's room, revealed there was an unknown dried brown substance on two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. An injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Survey Agency as required after discovery of a bruise to a resident's right eye (Resident #146); and, 2. An allegation of resident to resident physical abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency as required (Resident #154). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #146, Resident #154) of 3 (Resident #56, Resident #146, Resident #154) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition policy and procedure, dated 09/30/2019, revealed, in part, the facility must ensure all alleged violations involving injuries of unknown origin and abuse were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency) in accordance with state law through established procedures. 1. Review of Resident #146's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #146) of 3 (Resident #56, Resident #146, Resident #154) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition policy and procedure dated 09/30/2019, revealed, in part, for an allegation of abuse, the administrator was to complete a thorough investigation, including interviews of employees who were working in the resident's room during the time in question, and obtaining signed statements from these employees. Further review revealed the investigator would interview the resident if the resident was cognitively able to answer questions, and if not able to interview, the investigator would interview the resident's roommate. Review of Resident #146's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 04/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #146 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 (00-07 indicated Resident #146 had a severe cognitive impairment). Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A referral was made to the Louisiana Office of Behavioral Health's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program for a resident with a onset of mental illness since admission (Resident #121); and, 2. A referral was made to the Louisiana Office of Behavioral Health's PASRR program for a resident identified with a mental illness upon admission (Resident #17). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #17, Resident #121 of 3 (Resident #17, Resident #57, Resident #121) sampled residents investigated for PASRR. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #121's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #121 had a diagnosis of moderate, recurrent, Major Depressive Disorder with an onset date on 09/02/2022. Further review revealed no documented evidence a PASRR Level II evaluation was completed for Resident #121 and/or a referral was made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurately completed to reflect a resident's mental illness for 1 (Resident #17) of 3 (Resident #17, Resident #57, Resident #121) sampled residents investigated for PASRR requirements. Findings: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, major depressive disorder and bipolar II disorder. Review of Resident #17's incomplete and undated Level I PASRR revealed, in part, Resident #17 was documented to not have been diagnosed with a mental illness. Further review revealed no psychiatric diagnosis was selected/identified on the above mentioned assessment. In an interview on 04/30/2025 at 1:35PM, S4Administrator Assistant (AA) indicated Resident #17 was admitted with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and bipolar II disorder. S4AA further indicated Resident #17's undated preadmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received nail care for 1 (Resident #22) of 2 (Resident #21, Resident #22) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: Review of Resident #22's April 2025 Care Task log revealed, in part, Resident #114's nail care task was documented as not applicable on 05/01/2025 at 5:59AM. Observation on 05/01/2025 at 8:28AM revealed all 10 of Resident #22's fingernails were yellowed and extended one-fourth to one-half of an inch above the tips of Resident #22's fingers. Further observation revealed an unknown gray substance was visible underneath Resident #22's nails where they extended above Resident #22's fingertips. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 8:28AM, Resident #22 indicated that he would like his fingernails cut. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 8:39AM, S25CNA indicated Resident #22 required total assistance with ADLs. Observation on 05/01/2025 at 10:40AM revealed all 10 of Resident #22's fingernails were yellowed and extended one-fourth to one-half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a carton of nutritional supplement was stored per a manufacturer's guideline and was not available for resident consumption. Findings: Review of Med Plus 2.0 nutritional supplement's directions revealed, in part, the product should be used within 4 hours of opening if not refrigerated. Observation on 05/01/2025 at 8:30AM revealed an opened unrefrigerated carton of Med Plus 2.0 nutritional supplement on Medication Cart d. Further observation revealed the above mentioned carton had an opened date of 04/30/2025. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 8:45AM, S13Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the above mentioned supplement was opened on 04/30/2025, not refrigerated, and available for resident consumption. S13LPN further indicated he did not know the supplement should have been used within 4 hours of opening if not refrigerated. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 11:00AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed nursing staff should have ensured the carton of Med Plus 2.0 nutritional supplement was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) was accurately documented for 2 (Resident #14, Resident #99) of 4 (Resident #14, Resident #17, Resident #67, Resident #99) sampled residents reviewed for accurate medical record documentation. Findings: Review of the facility's Employee Handbook Code of Conduct dated 10/01/2024 revealed, in part, all employees were required to be truthful in all communication and written records to ensure resident records were accurate. Review of the facility's Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description dated 10/2024 revealed, in part, it was the responsibility of the LPN to have knowledge of federal and state laws and regulations related to resident care and to carry out the assigned duties and responsibilities in accordance with current existing federal and state regulations. Resident #14 Review of Resident #14's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #14 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to administer medications per the physician's order for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled resident's records reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 received application of an ointment or medication other than to feet. Review of Resident #1's October 2024 Physician Orders revealed, in part, Nystatin powder (an antifungal medication) was to be applied to Resident #1's right abdominal fold twice a day and as needed until resolved. Further review revealed the nystatin powder was originally ordered on 07/09/2024. Review of Resident #1's September 2024 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed, in part, Nystatin powder was scheduled to be applied at 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. daily. Further review of the September 2024 eMAR revealed nystatin powder was not applied at 8:00 a.m. on 09/07/2024 and at 4:00 p.m. on 09/03/2024, 09/04/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse displayed competency to clarify a physician's order related to a medication change for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled resident's records reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Findings: Review of Louisiana Revised Statue, Title 37, Section 961 revealed, in part, the licensed practical nurse must practice under the direction of a licensed physician, optometrist, or dentist acting individually or as a member of the medical staff, registered nurse or physician assistant. Review of Resident #1's record revealed, in part, a diagnosis of Diabetes. Review of Resident #1's current Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #1 has a diagnosis of Diabetes with an intervention which included to administer medications as ordered by the physician. Review of Resident #1's October 2024 Physician Orders with a start date of 10/11/2024 revealed an order to administer Tresiba (a long acting insulin used to control high blood sugar) 30 Units (U) every day at 7:00 p.m. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records were complete and/or accurately documented for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident#2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for pharmacy. Findings: Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse's job description dated 04/15/2015 revealed, in part, the following responsibilities: 1. Prepare and administer medications according to procedure; and, 2. Record nursing information on resident's care plan and clinical record, including medication records. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's October 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, the following: 1. Gabapentin tablet (a medication used to treat seizures and neuropathic pain) give 600 milligrams (mg) three times a day; 2. Artificial tears (a medication used to treat dry eyes) ophthalmic solution instill one drop in the left eye four times a day, and 3. Prednisolone-Moxifloxacin-Bromfenac eye drops (an eye drop used for inflammation, infection, and pain after surgery) instill one drop three times a day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents observed. Findings: Review of the facility's Med Pass Guidelines policy and procedure dated 12/04/2017 revealed, in part, the nurse administering medications were not to leave residents with medications in a cup. Further review revealed the nurse should make sure to see the resident take their medications. Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/03/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #1's record revealed no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence Resident #1 was assessed and/or care planned to self-administer medications. Observation on 10/10/2024 at 9:47 a.m. revealed a medicine cup containing 9 pills was on Resident #1's bedside table. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided a bath for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: Review of the facility's Bed Bath Policy and Procedure dated 08/01/2017 revealed, in part, bed baths were to be provided to residents as scheduled and/or as needed. Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/25/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 had limitations in range of motion in his bilateral upper and lower extremities and required partial to moderate staff assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan with a start date of 04/26/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was care planned to require staff assistance with ADLs with an intervention for staff to assist Resident #1 with bathing. In an interview on 10/07/2024 at 11:59…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bath type was accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/25/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 had limitations in range of motion in his bilateral upper and lower extremities and required partial to moderate staff assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan with a start date of 04/26/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was care planned to require staff assistance with ADLs with an intervention for staff to assist Resident #1 with bathing. Review of Resident #1's August 2024 Bath Log revealed, in part, documentation that Resident #1 was provided a shower on the following dates: -08/04/2024; -08/10/2024; -08/12/2024; -08/15/2024; -08/16/2024;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1.) Ensure a resident's fall mat was at the bedside for 2 (Resident #44 and Resident #98) of 3 (Resident #12, Resident #44, and Resident #98) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards; and, 2.) Ensure a resident's dycem was in his wheelchair for 1 (Resident #44) of 3 (Resident #12, Resident #44, and Resident #98) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 10/22/2014 and titled, Fall Prevention Program Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, residents who are classified as a high risk for falls would have a careplan addressing their goals and approaches to prevent falls. Resident #44 Review of Resident #44's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/20/2024 revealed Resident #44's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 8,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility: 1. Failed to sanitize the thermometer when internal temperatures of foods were measured; and, 2. Failed to perform hand hygiene during meal service. Findings: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code United States Food and Drug Administration revealed, in part, temperature measuring device probes must be sanitized to prevent contamination of products when internal temperatures are measured. Observation on 04/16/2024 at 11:27 a.m. revealed S7Culinary [NAME] did not sanitize the thermometer before she inserted the thermometer into the pureed cauliflower to obtain the temperature. S7Culinary [NAME] then used a dishtowel, located on the food preparation table, to wipe the thermometer. S7Culinary [NAME] inserted the thermometer into the pureed lasagna, obtained a temperature, and wiped the thermometer with a paper towel. S7Culinary [NAME] then inserted the thermometer into the regular consistency lasagna, obtained the temperature, and wiped the thermometer with a paper towel. S7Culinary [NAME] then inserted the thermometer into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room and equipment was kept clean for 1 (Resident #124) of 4 (Resident #21, Resident #32, Resident #46, and Resident #124) residents reviewed for environment. Findings: Observation on 04/15/2024 at 12:00 p.m. revealed large areas of a dried tan substance on the floor near Resident #124's tube feeding pole and on the base of the tube feeding pole. Observation on 04/16/2024 at 10:07 a.m. revealed large areas of a dried tan substance on the floor near Resident #124's tube feeding pole and on the base of the tube feeding pole. Observation on 04/17/2024 at 11:49 a.m. revealed large areas of a dried tan substance on the floor near Resident #124's tube feeding pole and on the base of the tube feeding pole. Observation further revealed Resident #124's wheelchair had 2 law labels (a legally required label on new items describing the fabric and filling usually saying This tag may not be removed under penalty of law except by the consumer) that were covered in a dark brown substance. In an interview on 04/17/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to check a resident's peg tube placement prior to administration of an enteral nutritional therapy feeding (nutritional supplementation supplied through a tube that enters the stomach) for 1 (Resident #146) of 2 ( Resident #94 and Resident #146) residents investigated for nutrition. Findings: Review of the facility's Enteral Nutritional Therapy (Tube Feeding) Policy and Procedure dated 01/14/2016 revealed, in part, check position of tube by placing the stethoscope over the stomach and instill a small amount of air into enteral feeding tube and listen for air to enter the stomach. Review of Resident #146's electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dysphagia 9difficulty in swallowing) and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #146's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #146 was dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) did not work without their designated on-site supervisor per their Consent Agreement/Orders from the Louisiana State Board of Practical Nurse Examiners for 2 (S4LPN and S5LPN) of 2 (S4LPN and S5LPN) Licensed Practical Nurses reviewed for compliance with Louisiana State Board of Practical Nurse Examiners probation requirements. Findings: S4LPN Review of S4LPN's Louisiana State Board of Practical Nurse Examiners Employer's agreement with a start date of 10/17/2023 revealed, in part, S4LPN would work a 7-3 shift at the facility and S2DON would be S4LPN's designated on-site supervisor. Further review revealed the on-site supervisor must be physically present at the facility at all times while the probated licensed practical nurse was present and working. Review of S4LPN and S2DON's time sheets for November 2023 revealed, in part, S4LPN worked in the facility 6 evening shifts when S2DON was not present. S5LPN Review of S5LPN's Louisiana State Board of Practical Nurse Examiners Consent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse by Resident #6 and Resident #R1. This deficiant practice was identified for 2 (Resident #R2 and Resident #5) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse-Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, each resident has to right to be free from abuse. Further review revealed, abuse is the willful infliction of injury and physical abuse included hitting and slapping. Resident #6 Review of the facility's incident report dated 09/21/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #6 hit Resident #R2 on the left side of the face and on the right shoulder with a closed right hand. Review of Resident #6's nurse's notes dated 09/21/2023 revealed, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse and resident to resident physical abuse involving 3 (Resident #R1, Resident 5, and Resident 17) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse was reported to the state survey agency within 2 hours of the allegation and; 2. Ensure an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse for 1 (Resident #17) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse was reported to the state survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident to resident sexual abuse and allegations of resident to resident physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #R1) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2), and failed to initiate an appropriate corrective action plan for 1 (Resident #5) of the 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #R1, and Resident #R2) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse - Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, the Administrator will complete a thorough investigation, including interviews of employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in a secure manner. Findings: Observation on 11/13/2023 at 12:49 p.m. revealed S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) opened the over the counter (OTC) medication storage closet and S4LPN opened the OTC medication storage closet without the use of a key. Further observation revealed obtained a medication, closed the OTC medication storage closet door, did not lock the door, and returned to her medication cart. The surveyor remained within eyesight of the OTC medication storage closet until 12:59 p.m., at which time, S3Regional Quality Improvement Nurse approached the surveyor. In an interview on 11/13/2023 at 12:59 p.m., S3Regional Quality Improvement Nurse stated the OTC medication storage closet should be locked at all times, and he confirmed the door was unlocked when S3Regional Quality Improvement Nurse accompanied the surveyor to the OTC closet and found the door to be unlocked. S3Regional Quality Improvement Nurse confirmed there were 57 different OTC medications stored in the unlocked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to have accurate and complete documentation for oral care and bath care for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings: Resident #1: Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, in part, assessments of Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 3, which was severely impaired cognition. Review of Functional Status revealed personal hygiene and bathing required one person physical assist. Review of Resident #1's Personal Hygiene Roster revealed, in part, from 07/09/2023 to 07/20/2023 there was no documentation of oral care being provided twice a day. Review of the Bath Day Roster revealed, in part, from 08/20/2023 to 08/28/2023 and from 09/14/2023 to 09/18/2023 revealed no documentation of a bath. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 10:40 a.m., S1Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed for Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer a resident's medication as ordered. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, History of Stroke, Hypertension, and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. Review of Resident #2's July 2023's Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order for Ozempic (diabetic medication) 1 milligrams (mg) Sub Q (Subcutaneous) injection every Tuesday with a start date of 07/11/2023. Review of Resident #2's August 2023's Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order for Ozempic 2 mg Sub Q injection every Tuesday. Review of Resident #2's September 2023's Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order for Ozempic 2 mg Sub Q injection every Tuesday. Review of Resident #2's July 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received an assistive device to maintain vision abilities for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 ( Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5) sampled residents. FINDINGS: Review of Resident #2's diagnosis revealed, in part, a history of cataracts (a cloudy area in the lens of the eye that leads to decreased vision) and Diabetes. Review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) with ARD (Assessment Reference Data) dated 06/28/2023 revealed, in part, Section B (Hearing Speech, Vision )- corrective lenses; and Section C (Cognition) - BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 15 which indicated Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Review of progress notes dated 02/09/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had surgery to her left eye. Review of progress note dated 04/06/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #2 had surgery to her right eye. Review of the physician's post-operative cataract surgery visit note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the provider failed to ensure the accuracy of resident's records for 6 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #R6, Resident #R7, Resident #R8, Resident #R9) of 9 residents reviewed for accurate records.Findings: Review of Resident #2's December 2025 Task Log documentation report revealed, in part, on 12/03/2025 at 11:55AM, S15CNA documented on Resident's #2 performance regarding bed mobility, toilet use, bowel elimination, that Resident #2 was turned and positioned, and that Resident #2 had eaten 51-75% of the 8:00AM meal. Further review revealed on 12/03/2025 at 11:56AM, S15CNA documented on Resident #2's performance regarding bladder elimination. Review of Resident #3's December 2025 Task Log documentation report revealed, in part, documentation a bed bath was completed for Resident #3 by S10CNA on 12/02/2025. Review of Resident #R6's December 2025 Task Log documentation report revealed, in part, on 12/03/2025 at 11:54AM, S15CNA documented on Resident's #R6 performance regarding bed mobility, toilet use, bowel elimination, bladder elimination,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-18 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly assessments in a timely manner for 7 (Resident #45, Resident #56, Resident #74, Resident #88, Resident #132, Resident #149, and Resident #164) of 18 (Resident #6, Resident #20, Resident #45, Resident #56, Resident #74, Resident #88, Resident #92, Resident #101, Resident #103, Resident #120, Resident #130, Resident #132, Resident #147, Resident #149, Resident #158, Resident #162, Resident #164, and Resident #170) residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings: Resident #45 Review of Resident #45's Quarterly Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/06/2024 revealed, in part, the assessment was completed on 04/12/2024, and the completion date was more than 14 days after the ARD; Resident #56 Review of Resident #56's Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 03/06/2024 revealed, in part, the assessment was completed on 04/15/2024, and the completion date was more than 14 days after the ARD; Resident #74 Review of Resident #74's Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 03/06/2024 revealed, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-18 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit resident assessments to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in a timely manner for 9 (Resident #6, Resident #20, Resident #92, Resident #103, Resident #120, Resident #130, Resident #147, Resident #162, and Resident #170) of 18 (Resident #6, Resident #20, Resident #45, Resident #56, Resident #74, Resident #88, Resident #92, Resident #101, Resident #103, Resident #120, Resident #130, Resident #132, Resident #147, Resident #149, Resident #158, Resident #162, Resident #164, and Resident #170) residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings: Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's Annual assessment with an ARD of 02/28/2024 revealed, in part, the assessment was completed on 02/29/2024. Review of the facility's Final Validation Report dated 04/15/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #6's Annual assessment was submitted to CMS on 04/15/2024 and was submitted more than 14 days after the completion date. Resident #20 Review of Resident #20's Quarterly assessment with an ARD of 02/28/2024 revealed, in part, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
QSST TRUST FOR GENE OLIVER QUIRK IIIOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 12/31/2012
QSST TRUST FOR MARSHALL TODD QUIRKOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 12/31/2012
QSST TRUST FOR SCOTT HOLDEN QUIRKOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 12/31/2012
QUIRK, CYNTHIAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST28%since 12/31/2012
QUIRK, GENEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST28%since 12/31/2012
WHITE, CHARLESIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/29/2016
DELATTE, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/23/2004
QUIRK, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/16/2010

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 2%Other / private 9%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$256per resident / day
operating cost
$7,769per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$269per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195272. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next