Sterling Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 126.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services and assistance to maintain bladder continence for 1 (#1) of 2 (#1 and #5) continent residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #1, a continent resident, on 08/19/2023 at 5:53 a.m. when she attempted to go to the restroom and fell in her room. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a left knee replacement surgery which required one person assist with utilization of a walker for mobility. On 08/19/2023 at 4:27 a.m., Resident #1 began asking S5CNA for assistance to the restroom. S5CNA failed to assist Resident #1 to the restroom. On 08/19/2023 at 5:53 a.m., Resident #1 fell on the floor hitting her face after attempting to go to the restroom to prevent urination on herself. Resident #1 sustained a cut on her nose and was transferred to a local hospital and diagnosed with a Right Frontal Scalp Hematoma with Diffuse Ecchymosis noted around both eyes. Findings: Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report a serious bodily injury of unknown origin ,resulting in a fracture, to the State Survey Agency within the required 2 hour timeframe for 1 (#64) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse - Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure, dated 03/25/2023, revealed, in part:Procedure:7. Reporting/Response: The facility employee or agent who becomes aware of injuries of unknown source shall immediately report the matter to the facility administrator. The administrator notifies the regional director and corporate nurse. The administrator shall immediately initiate a report in the State's Incident Management System and the facility's local enforcement agency, but not less than 2 hours after forming the suspicion of a crime if the alleged violation results in serious bodily injury. Review of Resident #64's Quarterly MDS Assessment with an ARD of 04/08/2026, revealed the resident had a BIMS of 10, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review revealed he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to document temperatures on temperature logs. This had the potential to affect the 121 residents who were served by the kitchen.Findings:Review of the policy titled, Monitoring Temperatures of Cooked Foods with a revision date of 10/2018 revealed the following, in part:The temperature of potentially hazardous cooked foods will be monitored to ensure the foods are not in the danger zone (above 41F and below 135F).Procedures:3. Cooking and holding temperatures should be recorded on the Food Holding Temperature Log or other form .4. Storage temperatures should be recorded on the Food Holding Temperature Log or other form. Review of the policy titled, Food Storage Labeling with a revision date of 05/2023 revealed the following, in part:5. Storage temperatures are routinely monitored and documented using the appropriate temperature logs.6. Temperatures are recorded daily.Review of the document titled Temperature Log dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 127 residents who were served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage Labeling, with a revision date of 10/2018, revealed, in part: The facility will store and label all foods to ensure safety and quality. 7. Food is stored in containers that are sealable, leak proof, durable, and undamaged. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Service Operation Standards for Purchasing, Cooking and Storage, with a revision date of 10/2018, revealed, in part: 5. Thawing a. The preferred method is to thaw under refrigeration at a temperature of 40 degrees F or below. i. Store raw foods on the lowest shelf to prevent them from dripping or splashing onto other foods. On 06/16/2025 at 12:27 p.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S2CSA. Observations were made of the following items: 14 fried chicken patties, dated 06/15/2025, uncovered, in walk-in cooler…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan which met the needs of 2 (#9 and #124) of 2 (#9 and #124) residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility failed to ensure weekly weights were completed as ordered. Findings: Resident #9 A review of Resident #9's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #9's most recent Care Plan revealed Resident #9 was at risk for weight loss with an intervention of weighing resident as appropriate implemented on 10/20/2024. Review of Resident #9's Current Physician Orders revealed the following: 01/10/2025 Weekly weights Review of Resident #9's May 2025 through June 2025 weekly weights revealed no weight was obtained the week of 05/20/2025. Resident #124 A review of Resident #124's Clinical Record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to monitor, modify, and implement interventions after weight loss for 1 (#124) of 3 (#12, #98, and #124) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure 1. Resident #124 was assessed for food preferences; and 2. Resident #124 was weighed weekly, treating providers were notified of weight loss, and new interventions were implemented. Findings: Review of the facility Policy titled, Weight Evaluation, dated 09/25/2024 revealed the following: Purpose: To review, monitor and maintain the resident's weight. Procedure: 2. The DON or designee with review weights weekly, monthly and as needed. 5. High risk residents will be discussed in high risk meeting. a. Recommendation with interventions will be made and discussed with the physician or designee. 7. DON/Designee will address weight in his/her notes and will give a list of those residents to Registered Dietician to review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 (#44 and #56) of 5 (#42, #44, #56, #332, # and #381) resident's records had documentation indicating the resident either received or did not receive a pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Vaccinations Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations Policy and Procedure, dated 09/18/2017, revealed, in part: Purpose: The facility will give the resident the opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, unless medically contraindicated, refused or was already immunized. Procedure: Pneumonia 2. Each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. 3. The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates: b. That the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization Resident #44 Review of Resident #44's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (#9) of 2 (#9 and #61) residents reviewed for call lights. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Call Light System, dated 09/14/2022, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: To provide a communication system with audible or visual signals to allow residents to call for staff assistance . Procedure 6. When providing care to residents, be sure to positon the call light conveniently within reach for the resident to use. A review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side and Cognitive Communication Deficit. A review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/25/2025 revealed the resident was dependent on staff for transfers. On 06/17/2025 at 02:10 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #9.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's room were clean and maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 (#117) of 3 (#20, #95, and #117) sampled residents investigated for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #117's room were properly cleaned and free of urine odor. The deficient practice had potential to affect all incontinent Residents in facility. Findings: An observation was made on 06/17/2025 at 9:35 a.m. of Resident #117's room and a strong odor of urine was noted. An interview was conducted on 06/17/2025 at 1:06 p.m. with Resident #117. Resident #117 stated he did not like to complain and became quiet when asked if he liked the environment of his room. An observation was made on 06/17/2025 at 03:53 p.m. of Resident #117's room and a strong urine odor was noted while standing in the hallway. An interview was conducted on 06/17/2025 at 03:58 p.m. with S18CNA. She stated Resident #117 had incontinent episodes. S18CNA entered Resident #117's room and confirmed a strong odor of urine was present. An interview was conducted on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II by failing to incorporate a PASRR Level II determination and recommendations into a resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set ) for 1 (#42) of 2 (#42 and #99) residents reviewed for PASRR. Review of Resident #42's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 06/20/2023 and diagnoses, which included Schizoaffective Disorder - Bipolar Type, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations, and Unspecified Psychosis. Review of Resident #42's BHSF Form 142 revealed she was approved for admission by Level II PASRR effective 11/20/2024. Review of Resident #42's Significant Change MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 01/08/2025 revealed question A1500, Resident evaluated for PASRR, was answered as no. An interview was conducted with S8MDS on 06/17/2025 at 2:14 p.m. S8MDS reviewed Resident #42's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 01/08/2025, and confirmed it was coded Resident #42 did not have a Level II PASRR. S8MDS confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to ensure each resident received scheduled baths for 1 (#73) of 2 (#9 and #73) residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings: Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease, End Stage Renal Disease, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Review of Resident #73's admission MDS assessment, with an ADR of 04/07/2025, revealed Resident #73 had a BIMS of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive function. Review of Resident #73's Current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Focus: The resident requires limited to extensive staff assistance for ADL care. Interventions: Resident prefers morning baths. Review of Resident #73's ADL documentation revealed she was scheduled to receive baths on Monday, Wednesday, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA