The Guest House Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 93.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.89 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.47 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff communicated a significant change in condition to the resident's physician for 1(#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for notification of change. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 07/13/2024 at 5:24 a.m., when Resident #1, a resident who at baseline was active and could independently ambulate, complained of pain to the lower extremities, exhibited swelling to the left knee, and was unable to bear weight or ambulate. S3LPN failed to report Resident #1's significant change in status to the medical provider on call immediately. Resident #1 continued to decline in activities of daily living until 07/15/2024 around 8:00 a.m. when an x-ray was ordered and revealed an acute Left proximal femur fracture and Chondral irregularity of the left femoral head, which could indicate AVN. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital where he underwent Left Hip Hemiarthroplasty on 07/16/2024. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the nursing staff failed to recognize, monitor, intervene, and document a resident's significant change in condition to avoid delayed treatment for 1(#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for injuries which required hospitalization. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 07/13/2024 at 5:24 a.m., when Resident #1, a cognitively impaired resident who at baseline ambulated independently without pain, was observed by staff to have new onset pain to the lower extremities, swelling to the left knee, and was unable to bear weight or ambulate. Resident #1 continued to exhibit signs of pain, decreased mobility, decline in activities of daily living, limited range of motion as well a new onset incontinence between the dates of 07/13/2024 through 07/15/2024. On 07/15/2024 around 8:00 a.m., an x-ray was ordered and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and mental abuse by Resident #86 for 4 (#19, #46, #61, and #63) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the Policy, Abuse- Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure, dated 03/25/2023 revealed the following: Policy: To provide a safe, abuse free environment for all residents. Types of abuse- Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, intimidation with resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Our policy presumes that abuse of any resident, even a resident in a coma, causes physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Verbal abuse is the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Name calling, cursing or yelling at a resident in anger. Physical abuse may include hitting, slapping, pinching, biting, shoving, and kicking. Mental abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received puree food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 (#100) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 10 residents who consume puree food from the facility's kitchen.Findings:Review of Resident #100's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #100's current, physician orders revealed the following, in part:Start Date: 04/03/2026; Pureed texture, Nectar/Mildly Thick ConsistencyReview of Resident #100's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part:Problem: The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t puree.Interventions: Provide and serve diet as ordered.On 06/01/2026 at 12:08 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #100 eating lunch in the dining room. Observation of her lunch revealed the red beans were noted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean, and homelike environment for 1 (#72) of 1 Resident's reviewed for Environment. Findings: On 05/31/2026 at 12:27p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #72's bathroom which revealed the ceiling had splotchy gray colored substance covering approximately 2/3 the ceiling. On 06/01/2026 at 12:00 p.m., a second observation was conducted of Resident #72's bathroom which revealed the ceiling had a splotchy gray colored substance covering approximately 2/3 of the ceiling. On 06/02/2026 at 1:00 p.m., a review of the facility's maintenance log for the previous three months revealed no evidence of Resident #72's bathroom ceiling was reported for maintenance. On 06/02/2026 at1:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with S15MS. S15MS confirmed on 06/01/2026, and 06/02/2026 he was in Resident #72's bathroom fixing her toilet and never noticed the ceiling. He confirmed the staff had not put in a work order for the ceiling, and he did not complete proactive rounds of resident's rooms unless…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of mental and physical abuse to the State Survey Agency immediately, but no later than 2 hours, for 3 (#19, #61, and #63) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The provider failed to ensure staff:Reported allegations of abuse when Resident #86 physically abused Resident #63 on 04/12/2026; and Reported allegations of abuse when Resident #86 physically abused Residents #19 and #61 on 05/07/2026. Findings:Cross Reference F600 Review of the Policy, Abuse- Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure, dated 03/25/2023 revealed the following:Policy: to provide a safe, abuse free environment for all residents. It you suspect verbal, physical or mental abuse of a resident contact the administrator immediately. Types of abuseAbuse is the willful infliction of injury, intimidation with resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Our policy presumes that abuse of any resident, even a resident in a coma, causes physical harm, pain, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions for dysphagia were implemented as identified on the care plan and in physician orders for 1 (#65) of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #65's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Alzheimer's Disease, Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, and Gastronomy status. Review of Resident #65's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/31/2025 revealed a BIMS of 8, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #65's current, physician orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 04/01/2025; NPO diet related to Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction Review of Resident #65's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part:Date initiated: 12/16/2024Problem: The resident requires tube feeding via PEG. Resident is NPO.Interventions: The resident needs assistance with tube feeding. See MD orders for current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote prevention and healing of pressure ulcers for 1 (#22) of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice had the ability to further affect any of the 3 resident's in the facility who were being treated for Pressure Ulcers. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy titled Skin Protocol with effective date 03/13/2026, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: To maintain healthy skin integrity, to prevent skin breakdown, to heal skin breakdown and prevent further skin breakdown. Procedure: 4. Residents will be turned/ repositioned every two hours or as appropriate. Review of Resident #22's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease and Pressure Induced Deep Tissue Damage of Right Heel. Resident #22 received a diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and proper glove use for 11 (#3, #14, #20, #26, #30, #33, #39, #54, #61, #65, and #67) of 13 (#3, #4, #14, #20, #26, #30, #33, #39, #54, #61, #65, #67, and #80) resident's observed for incontinence care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care Policy and Procedure with an effective date of 11/17/2015, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: 2. To prevent infection . Procedure: 5. Wash hands. 6. Put on disposable gloves. 13. Female perineal care. 14. Male perineal care. 20. Remove gloves. Wash hands. 21. Replace top bed linen as appropriate. 22. Make resident comfortable and or reposition resident as appropriate. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan by failing to perform blood sugar monitoring according to sliding scale and monitor the side effects/effectiveness of medications for 4 (#12, #24, #46, and #70) of 4 (#12, #24, #46, and #70) resident's reviewed. Findings: Resident #12 Review of admission Records for Resident #12 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included, in part: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety. Review of Quarterly MDS, revealed Resident #12 had BIMS 9, indicating cognitive impairment. Review of Plan of Care for Resident #12 dated 02/24/2025 included, in part: 1. Problem: Resident has Diabetes Mellitus Interventions: Diabetes medications as ordered by the doctor. 2. Problem: Resident uses antidepressant medication Interventions: Administer Antidepressant medications as ordered by physician, monitor and document adverse reactions, side effects and effectiveness as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered for 4 (#12, #24, #46, and #70) of 4 (#12, #24, #46, and #70) residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings: Resident #12 Review of admission Records for Resident #12 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included, in part: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, and Insomnia. Review of Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), with ARD (Assessment Data Reference) of 01/29/2025 for Resident #12 revealed he had a BIMS of 9, indicating cognitive impairment. Review of Plan of Care for Resident #12 dated 02/24/2025 included, in part: 1. Problem: Resident has Diabetes Mellitus Interventions: Diabetes medications as ordered by the physician. 2. Problem: Resident is on sedative/hypnotic therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (#54) of 13 (#3, #4, #14, #20, #26, #30, #33, #39, #54, #61, #65, #67, and #80) residents observed for dignity during incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure staff greeted the resident and explained the care to be provided. Findings: Review of the facility's General admission and Financial Agreement, packet dated 01/2023 revealed the following: IX Educational Material & Consents B. Residents Rights - Every resident in this facility has the right to: 12. Be treated courteously, fairly, and with the fullest measure of dignity. Review of Resident #54's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included the following in part; Unspecified Dementia without behavioral disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety, and Cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,001 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-07-31
• $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-07-31
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA