Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center
3254 E Midland Rd, Bay City, MI 48706 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 126 certified beds · (989) 686-3770 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.5% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.2% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.2% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.2% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.44 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 52.0–65.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.6–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.7–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 117.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 03/10/2026 at 8:44 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, observed residue on the blade of a carving fork, stored inside the knife holder. On 03/10/2026 at approximately 9:08 AM, observed built up residue on juice nozzles. During this observation, Dietary Manager F was asked how often the juice nozzles are cleaned, and he stated the nozzles are soaked after each meal.According to the 2022 Food Code, 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils, Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch, the food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations, nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of l\Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens being allowed to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system with an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 03/10/2026 at 1:07 PM, during the environmental tour with Maintenance Director H, free chlorine residual was tested at a bathroom hand sink, and the result was zero parts per million (ppm) in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During this observation, Maintenance Director H stated that free chlorine is usually at 0.5 ppm. On 03/10/2026 at 1:11 PM free chlorine residual was tested at the spa tub in Superior 1 hallway and the result was zero. On 03/11/2026 at 9:44 AM record review of the facility's Drinking Water Testing logs, shows the facility has designated a normal range of free…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified and respectful manner by respond to call lights timely and complaints of Staff cell phone use in resident care areas for anonymous resident council residents and residents ( #1, #12, #13, #90, #46, #117, #138) resulting in a lack of timely response of care needs, extended wait times for assistance, and residents verbalizations of discourteous staff, feelings of being a burden, frustration and sadness. Findings include: Resident #12: An interview was completed with Resident #12 in their room on 3/10/26 at 10:55 AM. When queried if facility staff treat them with dignity and respect, Resident #12 indicated there is a second shift aide (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]) who does not. When asked how the CNA does not treat them with dignity and respect, Resident #12 stated, I will ask to go to bed, and (the CNA) says they will have to come back because another (call) light is on. Resident #12 stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indication of a psychotropic/antidepressant drug dosage for 4 residents (#2, #9, #94, and #138), resulting in the facility's failure to fully inform the resident or responsible party by obtained signed consents with no medication dosage noted, doses per day or the route of the medication. Findings include: Resident #138: On 3/10/26 at 11:05 AM, Family Member Witness S was observed in Resident #138's room but the Resident was not present. When asked, Witness S revealed Resident #138 was out of their room with staff and they were waiting for them to return. Witness S was asked how long Resident #138 had been at the facility and replied, Since Thursday (3/5/26). When queried regarding the Resident's admission to the facility, Witness S revealed multiple family members including themselves and Resident #138's spouse (Witness T) were present when the Resident was admitted to the facility. Witness S was asked about the admission process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that annual Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments were completed for 4 residents (#2, #46, #113, #116) of 8 residents reviewed. Findings include: Medicaid.gov. 'Preadmission Screening and Resident Review'Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR requires Medicaid-certified nursing facilities:Evaluate all applicants for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID)Offered all applicants the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care settings)Provide all applicants with the services they need in those settingsPASRR is an important tool for states to use in rebalancing services away from institutions and towards supporting people in their homes, and to comply with the Supreme Court decision, [NAME] vs L.C. (1999),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures for safe medication storage for two residents (# 29 and #90) of two residents and one ([NAME] One) of four medication carts reviewed. Findings include:Resident #29: On 3/11/26 at 9:45 AM, an observation of Resident #29's room and interview were completed with the Resident and Family Member B on 3/11/26 at 9:45 AM. A bottle of iVIZIA eye drops (long lasting solution for dry eyes) was observed sitting on the dresser next to the Resident's bed. When asked about the eye drops, Family Member B responded they administered them to the Resident four times a day. When asked why the facility nursing staff did not administer the medication, Family Member B revealed they brought the eye drops to the facility because the Resident needs them, so they do it. When asked if the drops were always sitting on the bedside dresser, Family Member B verbalized they were. Record review revealed Resident #29 was originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pummel cushion (wheelchair cushion with a raised wedge in the center) was used for the treatment of documented medical symptoms for one resident (Resident #88) of one resident reviewed for restraints, resulting in a lack of a clear indication for use and ongoing assessment/reassessment for use. Findings include:Resident #88: On 3/10/26 at 1:50 PM, Resident #88 was observed sitting in a high back wheelchair in their room with Family Member J. Both footrests were in place on Resident #88's wheelchair with their feet positioned on the footrests. A pummel cushion was in place on the wheelchair. The front of the pummel cushion was slid down with the wedge of the pummel cushion partially off the edge of the wheelchair seat. Upon observation of the back of the wheelchair seat, the pummel cushion was noted to be positioned all the way to the back of the seat. An interview was completed at this time. When queried regarding the reason for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) for one resident (Resident #108) of one resident reviewed for resident assessments. Findings include. Resident #108: On 3/11/2026, at 10:00 AM, a record review of Resident #108's electronic medical record revealed a 10/20/2025 Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment that was completed and not submitted to CMS. A review of the progress notes revealed Resident #108 did not return to the facility. On 3/11/2026, at 11:03 AM, a record review along with MDS Nurse M of Resident #108's MDS assessments revealed the 5-day was submitted, but the discharge assessment was not. MDS Nurse M offered they must have submitted the 5-day assessment instead of submitting the discharge assessment. MDS Nurse M denied having an error report or any way of reconciling assessments that were export ready but not transmitted timely. MDS Nurse M during the interview completed and submitted the discharge assessment for Resident #108.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store nebulizer equipment in a sanitary manner for one resident (R11) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:Resident #11 (R11): R11 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility most recently on 02/25/2026 with diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.On 03/10/2026 at 9:35AM, during an interview with R11, an observation was made of a nebulizer mask fully assembled in a basket on the nightstand, liquid was still present in the medication cup. R11 was asked when the last breathing treatment was administered. R11 stated that she believed it was 2:00am on 03/10/2026, just prior to putting her Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mask on. On 03/10/2026 at 9:51AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) C. RN C was asked what the process for cleaning nebulizer equipment after the treatment is. RN C stated when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Provide antiviral medication timely for one resident (Resident #61), 2) Ensure barrier use, and 3) Ensure reusable medical equipment was sanitized prior to clean storage, resulting in influenza symptoms going untreated, contamination of medication cart with the likelihood of continued contamination. Findings include: Resident #7: 02/06/25 8:10 AM, observation of Nurse I prepare AM medications for Resident #7. Nurse I prepared blood glucose machine which was housed inside the alcohol swab cardboard box along with the following supplies: glucose strips, alcohol swabs and lancets. Nurse I entered Resident #7's room placed the cardboard box on the over bed table with no barrier. Once Nurse I competed the task, she placed the items inside the cardboard box and left out to the medication cart. Nurse I took the blood glucose machine and wiped down the front and the back with an alcohol swab, placed the machine back inside the alcohol swab box…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to accurately code the MDS (Minimum Data Set) for one resident (#24) and properly reflect one resident's (#61) pertinent care categories on the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) 802 form of 22 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy, resulting in Resident #24 being miscoded as utilizing restraints on the MDS and Resident #61's infection not being designated on the CMS 802. Findings include: Resident #24: On 2/5/2025 at 11:30 AM, Resident #24 was observed resting in bed as we conversed about her time at the facility. The resident was asked if she required any usage of a restraint when in/out of bed and she stated she did not. The resident and motorized wheelchair was free was restraints. It can be noted in the survey system Resident #24 triggered for restraints. On 2/5/2025 at 12:44 PM, Nurse O was asked if Resident #24 utilized any type of restraint. The nurse stated, no, but said she did have enabler bars in the past. On 2/6/2025 at 11:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment of transfer/mobility status for one resident (Resident #315) of four residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in unsupervised self-ambulation and transfer and an incomplete baseline care plan. Findings include: Resident #315: On 2/05/25, at 11:11 AM, Resident #315 was in their room in their bathroom with the door slightly ajar. While meeting with their roommate, Resident #315 hollered out, I got a problem in here. Resident #315 was observed standing on their pulled down pants with their socks half off all in a pile of bowel movement. There was a staff member walking by who was alerted who came quickly to assist the resident. On 2/06/25, at 12:12 PM, a record review of Resident #315's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] at 2:00 PM with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Hypertension and Glaucoma. A review of the Care Plan I have a potential/actual ADL deficit R?T (related to)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plan interventions for 3 residents (R23, R24, R164) of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in the likelihood for missed interventions in treatment and unmet needs. Findings include: Record review of 'Facility Assessment Tool', dated 1/162025, page 8 under staff education: Person-Centered Care- This should include but not be limited to person-centered care planning, education of resident and family/resident representative about treatments and medications, documentation of resident treatment preferences, end-of-life care, and advanced care planning. Record review of the facility 'Call Light' policy, dated [DATE], revealed call lights will receive consistent and adequate response in order to best meet the individuals' needs of each resident. Procedure: Call lights will be placed within reach of the resident. Resident #23 Hydration: Observation was made on [DATE] at 09:56 AM of Resident #23 laying in his bed, thin in appearance with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one resident (R164) of 18 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in residents feeling frustrated, anger, embarrassment from poor hygiene, unmet needs and complaints to the state surveyor. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Activity of Daily Living (ADL) (Daily Life Functions) policy, dated 7/1/2008, revealed the purpose was to assist residents in achieving maximum functional ability with dignity and self-esteem. To provide assistance to residents as necessary. To supervise and assess resident function in order to plan care to maintain optimum ADL function as long as possible. To re-educate resident in techniques of daily life functions. To teach resident use of assistive devices to maintain optimum ADL function as long as possible. To improve the quality of life. Record review of facility shower M1 and M2 shower room schedules undated revealed that there were set days for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00150074. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of wound care for one resident (Resident #93) of one resident reviewed for dressing changes, resulting in missed wound care treatments, not following physician's orders and voiced frustration. Findings include: Resident #93: On 2/05/25, at 11:00 AM, Resident #93 complained there was two missed wound care treatments the week prior because they were short staffed. On 2/07/25, at 11:50 AM, a record review of Resident #93's electronic medical record revealed a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Lymphedema, Left lower leg fracture and Obesity. Resident #93 required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living and had intact cognition. A review of the TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION RECORD 1/1/2025-1/31/2025 revealed Cleanse left leg with wound cleanser, use wet to dry dressing, cover with super absorber and ABD pad and wrap with kerlex and ace wrap twice a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to prevent pressure ulcer (wounds caused by pressure) development and worsening for two residents (#4 and #217) of two residents reviewed resulting in Resident #4's Stage II (partial thickness loss of first and second layer of skin) pressure ulcer progressing to a Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle), and Resident #217 developing an unstageable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- pressure ulcer with unknown depth), unnecessary pain and the potential for decline in overall health. Findings include: Resident #4: On 2/6/25 at 9:55 AM, an interview was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) N on 2/6/25 at 9:55 AM. When queried regarding the etiology of Resident #4's pressure ulcers, RN N revealed they believed the pressure ulcer worsened at the facility. Review of the facility-provided CMS-802 Resident Matrix form detailed Resident #4 did not have a facility- acquired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance for Resident #43 and to prevent weight loss for Resident #23, resulting in Resident #43 to be observed with no dining assist at bedside and Resident #23 experiencing a 10 pound weight loss. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Weight Policy' dated 11/21/2024 revealed each individual's weight will be determined and documented upon admission to the facility . Subsequent weights will be obtained monthly, unless physician's orders or an individual's condition warrants more frequent determinations. Re-Weights will be done for a weight change of +/- 3# (pounds) for anyone under 100 pounds and for +/- 5 pounds for anyone 100 pounds or over. Record review of the facility 'Diet Types' dated 9/26/2019 revealed each resident and guest admitted to the facility will be assessed by a Registered Dietitian and/or Clinical Certified Dietary Manager. Assessment will take place to evaluate the need for medical nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00149163 and MI00149254. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate indication of a psychotropic drug dosage increase for one resident (Resident #47) and failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to administration of psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in Residents #46 and #47 bring administered antipsychotic medications without appropriate consent and risk versus benefit analysis of the medications explained to the resident/responsible party and the increased potential for serious side effects and adverse reactions . Assessment and Documentation: (c.) (ii.) Informed consent forms the resident and/or responsible party along with education regarding potential side-effects . Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Use of Psychotherapeutic Medications' policy, dated 6/23/2019, revealed a resident will not receive psychotherapeutic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper insulin administration and provide the proper medication dosage for two residents (Resident #57, Resident #164) of five residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in unsafe injection practices, the uncertainty of an accurate insulin dose administered and improper medication reconciliation after hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #57: On 2/06/25, at 7:30 AM observation of Nurse H prepare am medications for Resident #57. Nurse H had the insulin pen resting on top of the medication cart. Nurse H picked up the insulin pen, screwed a needle onto the pen and dialed the pen to 5 units. Nurse H did not prime the needle with the required 2 units prior to administration into Resident #57's abdomen. On 2/06/25, at 9:44 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was alerted that Nurse H failed to prime the insulin pen needle with the required 2 units of insulin prior to administration. The DON was asked to provide the policy for medication administration and how to clean the blood glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for one medication cart of four medication carts reviewed during the medication storage task, resulting in medications stored unlabeled in a clear plastic medication cup. Findings include: On 2/07/25, at 1:00 PM, During medication storage task, an observation of Center hall medication cart along with Clinical Care Coordinator (CCC) J was conducted. CCC J opened up the second medication drawer. There was a clear plastic unlabeled medication cup filled with numerous medications sitting in the container labeled 227-1. CCC J removed the medication cup that housed Resident #710's am oral medications and began to look for the Nurse assigned to the medication cart. On 2/07/25, at 1:05 PM, Nurse I approached the medication cart and CCC J offered, you can't store med's in a cup in your drawer. Nurse I offered, they put them in there because the resident was unavailable. A record review of Medication Administration Record for Resident #710 along with Nurse I and CCC J revealed the am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices related to the use of: (1.) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), follow-up with employee health call-ins and (2.) proper hand hygiene, clean accu-check machine properly during medication pass and keep wound vac tubing off floor resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination and prolonged illness. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Infection Prevention and Control Program' policy dated 11/22/2019 revealed the purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for maintaining an infection prevention and control program that provides a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. Record review of the facility 'Director of Infection Control' job description dated 10/1/2020, revealed that key duties and responsibilities: Plan, implement, and evaluate infection prevention and control measures. Personal Protective Equipment:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of 6 residents (#21, #75, #65, #79, #151, and #148) and 4 of 4 residents from the confidential resident group, by answering call lights in a dignified and timely manner, resulting in verbalizations of anger, frustration, and fear, with the likelihood for falls with injuries and hospitalization. Findings Include: Resident # 75: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (MDS, dated [DATE]), nurse's and physician notes dated 1/24 through 2/24, revealed, Resident #75 was 94 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had cognitive decline and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The residents diagnosis included, Anxiety Disorder, [NAME] Lymphoma, Mood Disorder, Embolism and Thrombosis, Dementia, Hearing Loss and age related debility. Review of the Falls Risk and Behavioral care plan's dated 4/23, revealed the resident was to have her call light accessible, yelled out for assistance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three Certified Nurse Assistant and three licensed nurses yearly performance reviews were conducted, resulting in the lack of yearly job performance evaluation for 6 of 8 staff reviewed. Findings include: Record review of the facility job descriptions of Certified Nurse Assistant dated [DATE], Licensed Practical Nurse dated [DATE]. and Registered Staff Nurse dated [DATE], revealed that each position had specific job duties to perform at different levels of care for the residents. Each job description revealed that the level of care to be provided for the residents related to each position of Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Registered Nurse (RN). In an interview and record review on [DATE] at 12:55 PM with facility staff scheduler P regarding employee call-ins. Scheduler P stated that normal staffing is 13 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) on day shift, 10 on second shift, and 8 CNAs on nights. All CNA's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 97 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased air quality. Findings include: On 02/06/24 at 09:00 A.M., An interview was conducted with Director of Maintenance H regarding the facility maintenance work order system. Director of Maintenance H stated: We have the TELS software system. On 02/06/24 at 09:32 A.M., 11 of 11 conference room chairs were observed (etched, scored, particulate), creating a bacterial harborage and cross-contamination concern. On 02/06/24 at 10:40 A.M., A common area environmental tour of the facility was conducted with Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services I. The following items were noted: Lobby Restroom: The return-air ventilation grill was observed heavily soiled with dust and dirt deposits. The interior baffles and plenum were also observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and/or develop a care plan for two (R#6, R#59) Residents, resulting in Resident #6 to have a cardiac pacemaker with no interventions for pacemaker checks/follow-up and Resident #59 to not receive showers/bathes as care planned for twice weekly with likelihood for missed care intervention. Findings include: Surveyor request for a Care Planning policy from facility was notified that the facility follows the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual 3.0, 2019. Record review of the CMS Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 page 1-5 revealed that the purpose of the manuals to offer guidance about how to use the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) correctly to effectively to help provide appropriate care. Providing care to residents with post-hospital and long-term care needs is complex and challenging work. Clinical competence, observational, interviewing, and critical thinking skills, and assessment expertise for all disciplines are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards, to ensure 1) medications were not left at the bedside for 1 resident (Resident #88) who verbalized she chocked on a medication, 2) to document the incident on the facility occurrence report, and 3) to make a swallowing referral for further evaluation of change of condition, resulting in verbalization of fear of chocking on medications. Findings Include: Review of the Face Sheet, nursing notes dated 2/1/24 through 2/7/24, physician orders dated 1/11/23 through 1/11/24, revealed Resident #88 was 69 years-old, alert with confusion, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. The residents diagnosis included, [NAME] Matter Disease (decrease in white brain matter, may lead to dementia and cognitive decline), Alcohol Dependence, Encephalopathy (enlargement of brain), Anxiety, and Altered Mental Status. Review of the facility SLP (Speech Therapy) Evaluation and Plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of bathing and hygiene care for one Resident (#59) of two reviewed, resulting in the likelihood for foul body odors, lack of bathing and showers per resident preference, and verbalization of dissatisfaction. Record review of facility 'Activities of Daily Living (ADL's)' policy dated 7/1/2008, revealed the purpose was to assist residents as needed in achieving maximum functional ability with dignity and self-esteem to improve quality of life. Procedure: (1.) Staff will utilize the care plan/[NAME] to determine level of assistance and interventions required for each resident to complete Activities of Daily Living which include transfers, toileting, bed mobility, locomotion, eating, dressing and personal hygiene . Resident #59: Observation on 2/5/2023 at 9:22 AM during the initial tour of the resident living area of the facility revealed Resident #59 to be lying in bed in a t-shirt, gripper socks and wet brief. Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent injuries from falls for two residents (Resident #33, Residednt #63), resulting in falls with injuries and the likelihood for a decline in overall health status. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Falls Reduction Program' policy, dated 9/25/2016, revealed the purpose was to provide a safe environment for residents, modify risk factors, and reduce risk of fall related injury. (4.) Determine the need for ongoing assessments/interventions based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) reviews, fall risk history, and interdisciplinary team (IDT) member recommendation. The IDT to review each incident to complete root cause analysis . Review of the Resident Right booklet given to all residents upon admission, stated You have a right to be treated with respect and dignity. Review of the facility Call Light Policy, dated 5/17, stated Call Lights will receive consistent and adequate response in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic reconciliation was completed accurately, resulting in scribbled over narcotic numbers and lack of signature with the likelihood of narcotic diversion going unnoticed. Findings include. On 2/06/24, at 10:29 AM, During medication storage task, an observation of the [NAME] Medication cart 3 narcotic reconciliation document revealed no signature of narcotic reconciliation during am cart/keys exchange. Nurse N was asked if they signed the narcotic reconciliation document when they took over the medication cart and Nurse N stated, oh I forgot to sign. A record review of the CONTROLLED MEDICATIONS SHIFT CHANGE SIGN OUT SHEET revealed no signature for 2-6-24 7 A From the dates 1-30-24 through 2-6-24 there were 6 times the numbers were scribbled over one another. A review of two other controlled medications shift change forms revealed five other days nurses scribbled over numbers. On 2/06/24, at 10:39 AM, an observation of [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEXCARE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2013 |
| KOCH, WILLIAM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/10/2020 |
| PERRY, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| SANGSTER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/04/2013 |
| NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2004 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.