Fisher Senior Care and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that advance directives were updated in a timely manner and explained in clear language for one resident (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for code status.Findings Include:Resident #42:On [DATE] at 9:15 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #42's medical record and it revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety, Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia. Resident #42 her own responsible party. Further review of record yielded the following:Physician Orders:DNR-Do Not Resuscitate - placed on [DATE]Code Status Form:On [DATE] Signed by Resident #42, two physicians and two witnesses that .in the event my heart and breathing stop, no person shall attempt to resuscitate me.Care Plan: .Advance Directives have been discussed & the following has been decided DNR. I am my own decision maker .Care Conferences:[DATE]: .Care plan and code status reviewed, and she wishes to remain a CPR (Cardiopulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was administered as ordered for 1 resident (Resident #43) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings Include: Respiratory Care Resident #43:A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Respiratory failure, Primary Pulmonary hypertension, Emphysema, COPD, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and heart failure. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had full cognitive ability with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15 and the resident needed some assistance with care. On 4/13/2026 at 1:28 PM, Resident #43 was observed sitting in her room in a wheelchair. She had on a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator that was set at 6 Liters/L of oxygen per minute. There was no humidification bottle to provide moisture that would aid in preventing her nose from becoming dried out.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for administration of duplicate antidepressant therapy for two residents (Resident #4 & Resident #37) and ensure accurate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for one resident (Resident #43) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings Include:Resident #4: On 4/14/2026 at approximately 12:00 PM, a review was conducted of Resident #4's medical records and it revealed she readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Atrial Fibrillation, Major Depressive Disorder and Mood Disorder. Furter review of the record yielded the following:Physician Orders:Mirtazapine Oral Tablet 45 MG (milligrams) for Major Depressive Disorder- started on 9/13/2025Zoloft Oral Tablet 2.5 MG for Major Depressive Disorder. Ordered on 3/24/2026Review was conducted of Resident #4's nursing, physician and psychiatric progress notes were and there was no documentation located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin per professional standards for one resident (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for insulin administration, resulting in inaccurate site administration with the likelihood of malabsorption of insulin. Findings include. Resident #43: On 4/14/2026, at 8:26 AM, During medication administration task, Nurse K gathered morning medications for Resident #43 including their Insulin Glargine (Lantus) pen. Nurse K prepared the pen, entered the resident's room prepared the resident's right arm approximately 1 and 1/2 inches below the center of the deltoid muscle and injected the 10 units of insulin. On 4/14/2026, at 9:30 AM, Nurse K approached surveyor and asked if they did something wrong and Nurse K was asked if they felt where they injected the insulin pen/needle if there was enough subcutaneous tissue and Nurse K offered, the needle is so small. On 4/14/2026, at 1:45 PM, a record review of Resident #43's electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn during high contact care for one resident (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding [a method of delivering liquid nutrients directly into the stomach via a percutaneous gastrostomy tube (PEG)], resulting in the likelihood of transmission of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO). Findings include:Resident #4: On 4/13/2026, at 3:30 PM, a record review of Resident #4's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included feeding tube, Stroke and hypotension. Resident #4 required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and had intact cognition. A record review of the Kardex revealed INFECTION Enhanced barrier precautions for MDRO prevention, includes gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities . On 4/15/2026, at 8:54 AM, Prior to entry into Resident #4's room there was a 3-drawer caddy that housed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for four residents (#'s 28, 37, 100, 101), of seven reviewed for environmental concerns, resulting in personal items not labeled with Resident identification, food not labeled with an open date or refrigerated and the potential for spread of infection and food borne illness. Findings include: Resident #28: On 2/11/25 at 12:16 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #28 who was sitting up in their wheelchair. The Resident answered questions and engaged in limited conversation. The Resident had a bathroom that was shared with the room next door. There was not a resident in that room at this time. There were a pair of TED hose (Anti-Embolism stockings used to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis (blood clot)). The Resident was asked if he wore the TED hose and reported sometimes them put them on, not sure why they are not on at this time. The TED hose did not have a room number or Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately administered for three residents (R4, R14, R25) of four residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%. Findings include: On 2/12/25 at 7:41am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'C' prepared and administered medications for R25. The medications included: Acidophilus, Acetaminophen 500mg, pro-stat, Abilify 2mg, Buspar 5mg, Eliquis 5mg, Glipizide 10mg, Potassium Chloride 10mEq, Senna-S 8.6mg-50mg, Vitamin D 1000mcg, Metoprolol 100mg, Myrbetriq 25mg, Tamsulosin 0.4mg, Cymbalta 30mg, Lasix 40mg and Humalog 2units from an insulin pen. LPN 'C' prepared the insulin pens by dialing in the units to be administered to the resident. LPN 'C' did not prime the insulin pens prior to administering the prescribed units. On 2/12/25 at 8:02am, LPN 'C' prepared and administered medications for R4. The medications included: Novolog 7units from an insulin pen, Lantus 25units from an insulin pen, Amantadine 100mg, Chewable Aspirin 81mg, Gabapentin 100mg,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00147136. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold a scheduled 72-hour care conference for one resident (R150) of one reviewed for care conferences, resulting in missing a care conference and lack of information for the family and resident. Findings include: Resident #150: R150 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease and a malignant neoplasm of the bladder. R150 expired at the facility on [DATE]. R150 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS score of 15, indicating they were cognitively intact. On [DATE] at 1:13PM, an interview was conducted with a confidential family member of R150. Family 'A' stated that a care conference was supposed to be held on Friday [DATE], Family 'A' wanted to join by phone and the facility said they would call her when it was time for the conference. Family 'A' stated that R150 eventually called them and said they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise care plans for two residents (R19, R39) of a total sample of 17 residents, resulting in missing care plan updates and the potential for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident #19: R19 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction, seizures, major depressive disorder and anxiety. R19 has a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On [DATE] at 09:20AM, observation revealed that R19 is thin looking in appearance. On [DATE] at 03:19PM, record review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R19's weight on [DATE] was 167.2lbs and on [DATE], R19's weight was 141.4lbs, this was a loss of 25.8lbs, 18% in 30 days. On [DATE] at 03:29PM, record review revealed that the care plan for nutrition didn't reflect weight loss until [DATE]. The last review of R19's nutrition care plan was [DATE]. Review of a dietary progress note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #13 received vision services and that recommendations were addressed for one resident (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed for vision services, resulting in the lack of follow-up care for vision issues and the potential for vision abnormalities to be untreated or unidentified. Findings include: Resident #13: A review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 8/25/23 and re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the Resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13/15. On 2/12/25 at 8:50 AM, the Resident was dressed, seated in a wheelchair in their room. The Resident was interviewed, answered questions and engaged in limited conversation. The Resident was asked about any concerns he had and stated, My eyes are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $615K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI