Lakepointe Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 128.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-06-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement interventions to maintain or improve range of motion (ROM) and/or mobility, affecting three residents (R6, R22, and R77), resulting in the potential for further functional decline in joint motion and mobility. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) On 6/26/23 at 9:31 AM, R6 was observed lying in bed. R6 did not respond to inquiry and was unable to be interviewed. On 6/26/23 at 2:36 PM, R6 was observed to still be lying in bed. A review of R6's record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on 7/2/20, most recently re-admitted on [DATE], and is severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed that the resident requires total assistance from one to two staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), mobility, and transfers. R6's medical diagnoses include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Dysphagia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one resident (R05) of one resident reviewed for care plans. Findings include:R5On 8/25/25 at 9:30 AM, R5 was observed laying in their bed with their leg hanging over the bed. When asked about care, R5 shook their head and stated, it's okay. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R5 was originally admitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis of Dementia, Delusion Disorders, and adjustment disorder. Further review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score which indicated intact cognition and required maximum assistance with all activities of daily living.A review of R5's EMR revealed Behavior Notes on 8/1/25, 8/3/25, 8/9/25, 8/11/25, 8/15/25, 8/21/25 and 8/23/25, indicating R5 exhibited behaviors of trying to disconnect, pull out or unscrewing their tube feeding (tube inserted into the stomach for food and fluids).Review of R5's EMR care plan dated 7/16/25 and revised 8/7/25, with a focus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate facial hair grooming for one (R65) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: On 08/25/25 at 10:21 AM, R65 was observed lying in bed and appeared to be sleeping. It was observed that a notable amount of facial hair was present on their chin and jawline. Review of the facility record for R65 revealed an initial admission date of 09/13/21 with diagnoses including Chronic Pain Syndrome, Muscle Weakness, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of R65's care plan dated 06/09/25 revealed the ADL Focus area that included the intervention Hygiene/Grooming: 1 PA (person assist) Please remove any facial hair growth. The ADL care plan Goals statements included I will be neat, clean, and well-groomed daily through next review. The Kardex (nursing assistant care instructions) associated with R65's care plan included the instruction Ask if I would like to be shaved. On 08/26/2025 at 2:05 PM, R65 was interviewed in their room and asked how they feel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were maintained within reach for dependent residents for six residents (R117, R6, R118, R48, R482, and R108) of eight reviewed for call light placement. Findings include: R117 A fall report dated 07/20/24 documented R117 had a fall from their bed. The reported indicated R117 rolled out of bed due to agitation. On 08/06/24 at 1:26 PM, R117 was observed to be in bed. The call light for R117 was observed to be looped over the bracket of the tube feeding machine. The machine/pole was at the top edge of the bed and away from the side of the bed around two feet. On 08/07/24 at 8:29 AM, R117 was observed to be in bed, on their left side, angled toward the door. The call light was on the floor around the base of the tube feed stand. On 08/07/24 at 7:55 AM, 8:29 AM, and 9:16 AM, R117 was observed to be in bed. The call light was at foot of tube feed pole. At 10:54 AM and 1:43 PM, R117 was observed to be on their left side in bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one (R101) of six residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R101 revealed an admission date of 02/03/23 with diagnoses that included Heart Failure and Dementia. The record also indicated R101 was legally blind. On 08/06/24 at 10:38 AM, R101 was observed laying in bed and it was noted a list of hand written care instructions were posted above the head of the bed. The first item on the list stated He is a feeder. On 08/07/24 at 11:51 AM, R101 was observed in their room and the sign above the head of the bed stating He is a feeder remained in place. On 08/08/24 at 10:14 AM, R101 was observed laying in bed and the sign stating He is a feeder remained posted above the head of the bed. R101 was asked about the signs and stated I don't know what they are. On 08/08/24 at 1:42 PM, the facility Director of Nursing (DON) reported they were not aware of the sign referring to the resident as He is a feeder. The DON reported their expectation is that type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for three residents (R40, R108 and R482) of six reviewed for care planning. Findings include: On 8/6/24 at 9:49 AM, R40 was interviewed regarding the care and services they were receiving at the facility and indicated that they had experienced multiple falls at the facility. A review of R40's electronic medical record (EMR) progress note section revealed the following, 5/25/2024 23:13 (11:13 PM) Nurses: [R40] said [they] fell on the floor trying to get a cake from [their] roommate's daughter's boyfriend. Nurse and aide did not [witness] the fall. Roommate's granddaughter witnessed the fall. [They] said [R40] fell on the floor trying to [get] cake. They said [R40] fell on [their] back, but did not hit [their] forehead. [R40] told the writer and the aide [they] fell on the floor and hit [their] forehead, but later said [they] did not hit [their] forehead, but rather the back of [their] head. Witness said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one (R101) of six residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R101 revealed an admission date of 02/03/23 with diagnoses that included Heart Failure and Dementia. The record also indicated that R101 was legally blind and stated under Special Instructions that all personal items should be within reach. On 08/06/24 at 10:38 AM, R101 was observed laying in bed. Their water cup was on the over-bed table next to the wall at the head of the bed, out of the residents reach. On 08/07/24 at 11:51 AM, R101 was observed laying in bed. Their water cup was on the over-bed table next to the wall at the head of bed as it was the previous day. R101 was asked if they were able to reach their water cup if they wanted a drink and they stated No. On 08/08/24 at 10:14 AM, R101 was observed laying in bed. Their water cup was on the over-bed table adjacent to the head of bed, out of the resident's reach. Review of R101's care plan revealed no indication the resident should not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube feeding and medication via feeding tube per physician's orders or one (R482) out of one reviewed for PEG tube use. Findings include: R482 On 08/07/24 at 2:26 PM, R482 was observed in their medical recliner chair. A tube feeding pump was observed in the room which was powered off. No tube feeding bottles or tube feeding were observed in the room. On 8/7/24 at 4:15 PM, R482 was observed in their chair. Tube feeding is observed infusing at 65ml (milliliters) per hour through a pump. The pump was observed to show a remaining volume of 1220ml. On 08/08/24 at 8:05 AM, R482 was observed lying in bed on their back. No tube feeding was observed infusing or in the room. The pump was observed next to the resident's bed powered off. There was no tube feeding bottle or tubing noted in the room. A review of R482's record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure on oxygen tank for one (R108) of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings include: R108 On 08/06/24 at 9:23 AM, 10:17 AM, 10:40 AM, and 12:20 PM, an unsecured portable oxygen tank was observed in R108's room. On 08/07/24 at 8:17 AM, 10:34 AM, 11:55 AM, 2:17 PM, and 4:04 PM, R108 was observed in bed wearing oxygen per nasal canula via concentrator. An unsecured portable oxygen tank was observed in R108's room. A review of R108's record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute on chronic congestive heart failure and acute on chronic respiratory failure, unspecified dementia. A review of the minimum data set (MDS) revealed a Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating cognitive impairment. On 8/8/24 at 2:05 PM, during an interview, Clinical Care Coordinator (CCC) C was asked how portable oxygen tanks should be stored while in a resident's room. CCC C explained they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely secure medications for two (R6 and R29) of two residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: R6 On 08/07/24 at 8:16 AM and 08/07/24 10:36 AM, R6 was observed sleeping in bed. Timolol eye drops were observed on R6's bedside table within reach of R6. A review of R6's record reveals they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart failure, unspecified, and dementia. A review of R6's minimum data set (MDS) reveals a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating cognitive impairment. A review of R6 physician orders revealed no order for medication self-administration. R29 On 08/06/24 at 9:10 AM, 10:55 AM, 12:40 PM, and 2:23 PM, albuterol 90mcg (microgram) inhaler, artificial tears eye drops, and nasal spray medications were observed on R29's nightstand within R29's reach. On 08/07/24 at 8:09 AM, the albuterol 90mcg inhaler, artificial tears eye drops, and nasal spray medications were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, odor- and pest-free environment, affecting five residents (R7, R42, R29, R98 and R16) and current residents residing on the A and B units, resulting in the lack of a home-like living space, persistent foul odors, and resident dissatisfaction. Findings include: On 6/26/23 at 8:05 AM, an overwhelming feeling of stuffy, humid air and overpowering urine odor was noted upon entering the facility, as well as upon walking through various hallways to a conference room near the administrator's office. On 6/26/23 at 8:26 AM, during the initial tour, R7 was interviewed in their room. During the interview, the resident swatted multiple small flying bugs away from their face. No direct source for the bugs was noted in the resident's room. R7 indicated that the bugs were bothering them. A review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident is cognitively intact. On 6/26/23 at 10:00 AM, multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI