Four Chaplains Nursing Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00142187, MI00142251, MI00142309. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R901) received and consumed pureed foods as prescribed, resulting in airway obstruction/choking. On 1/17/24 at approximately 8:30am, R901 consumed a peanut butter sandwich resulting in the resident's airway becoming obstructed, requiring the use of the Heimlich Maneuver, CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation), and the use of forceps to remove copious amounts of the peanut butter sandwich from the resident's airway that led to hospitalization where the resident was placed on life-sustaining treatment, and died eight days later. Immediate Jeopardy: The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) started on 1/17/24 and the immediacy was removed 1/25/24 per review of the facility's responding interventions as verified on 1/25/24. The IJ was identified on 1/24/24 during an abbreviated survey. The facility was notified of the IJ on 1/24/24 at 4:37pm and was asked for a removal plan. The IJ was removed on 1/25/24, based on the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate diagnoses in comprehensive assessments for one (R14) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed, R14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included bipolar disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of a MDS assessment, with a reference date of 5/6/25 revealed R14 had active diagnosis of PTSD. The Bipolar Disorder was marked no. Review of a MDS assessment, with a reference date of 11/6/25 revealed R14 had active diagnosis of bipolar disorder and Schizophrenia. The PTSD was marked no. Review of a PASSAR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) dated 4/15/25 revealed, R14 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia and PTSD. In an interview on 2/13/26 at 10:58 a.m., Regional Clinical Registered Nurse (RN) E confirmed the MDS assessments dated 5/6/25 and 11/6/25 were not accurate. RN E reported they were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely repositioning for two residents, (R11, R78) of three reviewed for services to prevent pressure ulcer development. Findings include: R11On 02/11/2026 at 3:24 PM, R11 was observed, down in bed about a foot from the top of the mattress, leaning toward the left. R11 had multiple food items on a meal tray without much eaten for breakfast and lunch. A review of the record indicated a sacral wound; pressure related and a history of deterioration. On 02/12/2026 at 9:13 AM, R11 was observed hunched down, on their backside in bed. No devices were observed to be at the sides or under the legs to offload pressure. R11 was eating from the meal on the over bed tray table. At 11:02 AM, 12:30 PM, and 2:50 PM, R11 was observed to be on their back in bed, with the head of the bed almost flat. At 2:50 PM, the right hip was tilted up slightly, with heels, and backside on the bed without positioning devices. At 2:29 PM, the Therapy Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5% in three (R79, R14, R23) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R79In an observation and interview on 2/12/26 at 11:33a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) I prepared medications for R79. RN I removed R79's medication pack that read 7am-10am and included duloxentine (used for depression). RN I confirmed duloxentine was scheduled at 12:00 p.m. and was given at 10:00 a.m. RN I then reported she is sure she gave it because it was in the pack with the other meds scheduled for that time (7am -10am). RN I was asked within what timeframe a medication could be given, RN I confirmed if a medication is scheduled at 12 pm it should be given between 11 a.m. to 1p.m. Review of R79's medical record revealed admission into the facility on 3/14/23 with pertinent diagnosis which included Depression. Additional review revealed a current physician's order for duloxetine 60mg, give 1 capsule by mouth in the morning, with a start date of 11/16/24 and pass time of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food to prevent cross contamination, and failed to maintain adequate sanitizer concentration in the sanitizer bucket. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 12/3/24 at approximately 9:20 AM, in the reach-in cooler, there was pan of cooked noodles stored directly underneath a box of raw pork. Dietary Staff H confirmed the cooked noodles should not have been stored under the raw meat. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-302.11 Packaged and Unpackaged Food - Separation, Packaging, and Segregation, (A) Food shall be protected from cross contamination by: .(2) Except when combined as ingredients, separating types of raw animal foods from each other such as beef, fish, lamb, pork, and poultry during storage, preparation, holding, and display by: .(b) Arranging each type of food in equipment so that cross contamination of one type with another is prevented,. On 12/3/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, a red bucket filled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at the preferred temperature for eight residents (R81, R45, and six confidential group residents) of eleven reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) On 12/3/24 at 10:39 AM, R81 was interviewed about food palatability at the facility and stated, The food is always cold. R81 also indicated the only alternative menu item they could get was a peanut butter and jelly sandwhich. A review of R81's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic kidney disease and Type 2 diabetes. R81's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R81 had an intact cognition and required set up and clean up assistance during meals. Resident #45 (R45) On 12/3/24 at 10:42 AM, R45 was interviewed about food palatability at the facility and stated, The food is cold. A review of R45's electronic medical record revealed R45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to correctly document the discharge disposition of one (R85) of three residents for discharge. Findings include: A record review revealed R85 was discharged home with support services and appropriate equipment. R85 was transported home on [DATE] via non-emergency ambulance. On 12/3/24 further review of R85's MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) information revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital. On 12/4/24 an interview with the MDS Nurse B revealed the discharge was recorded incorrectly. A policy was requested for completing an MDS. The Nursing Home Administer revealed the MDS coordinator uses the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for completing the MDS. Per the October 2024 RAI manual pages 1-4, (1) the assessment accuratley reflects the resident's status .

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the local state mental health agency of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I changes for one resident (R77) of one resident reviewed for PASARR completions. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed R77 was admitted into the facility on 3/06/24 with the following diagnoses including alcohol abuse, alcohol induced psychotic disorder with delusions, adjustment disorder with anxiety, cognitive communication deficit and delirium. According to the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], R77's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 00 indicating severely impaired cognition. A review of R77's medical record revealed a PASARR form 3877 Hospital Exempted Discharge ([NAME]) dated for 3/06/24. A 3877 form covers a resident admission for 30 days and request for a level II for mental health services. A request was made to the Social Worker (SW A ) for further PASARR forms and level II request. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00148040. Based on interview and record review , the facility failed to timely initiate a care plan addressing a pressure ulcer for one (R388) of one resident reviewed for care planning. Findings include: The facility record revealed R388 was readmitted on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Acute on Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Aortic Valve Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Asthma, and Dementia. R388's Brief Interview of Mental Status score was 6/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the closed medical record revealed the reporting of a skin tear by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to a nurse on 11/3/24. An examination of the sacral (buttocks) wound by the wound care nurse on 11/4/24 revealed a wound 6.7 x 4.5 Centimeter (cm) related to shearing. Further review of the record revealed documentation by the physician dated 11/11/24 of the wound as an unstageable pressure injury (a full thickness pressure ulcer that is covered by slough-moist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an orthotic foot device (designed for the prevention of pressure ulcers at the heel) was implemented per physicians order for one resident (R77) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Findings Include: On 12/03/24 at 2:17 PM, R77 was observed lying in their bed without an orthotic foot device. On 12/04/24 at 10:00 AM, R77 was observed in bed lying on their back without an orthotic foot device on thier feet. On 12/04/24 at 12:10 PM, a nurse was observed completing care with R77. The was noted to be in bed without any orthotic device on their feet. A review of R77's medical record revealed a physician order dated 5/6/24 documenting, orthotic device on while in bed for each shift. Further record review revealed a Braden Scale Assessment score (standardized tool used to predict a patient's risk of developing pressure ulcers) of 13 on 9/7/24 indicating a moderate risk of developing a pressure ulcer. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/04/24 at 1:00 PM. The DON confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely podiatry care was provided for one resident (R1) and two confidential group residents of eight residents reviewed for foot care. Findings include: On 12/03/24 at 9:18 AM, R1 was observed lying in bed. R1's toe nails were observed to be long extending past the tip of the toes. R1 explained they had been waiting for their toenails to be cut and they have not seen podiatry in a long time. R1 explained it hurts when they wear shoes. A review of R1's record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease. Further record review revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 99 indicating an inability to complete the assessment. Further review of R1's record revealed a podiatry visit note dated 5/10/24 documenting, Podiatry care requested due to problems or conditions that may worsen if untreated On 12/04/24 at 1:46 PM, during an interview, the Social Worker (SW)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,126 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $45,126 — penalty dated 2024-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI