No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cascade Senior Care Center

2121 Robinson Road, Jackson, MI 49203 · For profit - Individual · 108 certified beds · (517) 787-4150 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2800 Spring Arbor Rd · (517) 782-9955 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
1925 Spring Arbor Rd · (517) 787-5228 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1401 S Brown St. · (517) 788-4227 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.1%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.4%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.8%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.0%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.2%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.3%24.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.8%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.781.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.921.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.7%CMS range 46.2–63.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.8–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.1–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 79.2 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-04)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2023-03-21 · tag F0839 — widespread
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight residents (Resident #14, #15, #23, #27, #31, #36, #39, and #47) received skilled nursing services including medication administration and assessments by a licensed nurse, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy when an unlicensed staff member administered medications, performed assessments, and falsified medical records to reflect the skilled nursing services were performed by a Registered Nurse (RN). Findings include: Review of the facility staff list revealed Staff Member J was a Nurse Grad. In an interview on 03/15/23 at 1:43 PM, Staff Member J self reported she was the facility's scheduler and wound nurse. Staff Member J identified herself as a Registered Nurse. When asked why the staff list identified her as a Nurse Grad, Staff Member J reported she still had to take her nursing boards. Staff Member J reported she was not licensed as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or RN. Review of Staff Member J's personnel file revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Breakfast was observed on the Meadow's unit, a dementia care unit, on 3/13/23; the breakfast meal cart was delivered to the unit at 7:43 AM. Seven rooms had droplet precaution signs and isolation kits with personal protective equipment (PPE), including gowns and gloves, on the front of the resident room doors. There were no goggles/face shields or N95 respirator masks noted in any of the 7 isolation kits hung resident doors on the unit. A cart for soiled linen and another cart for trash were noted in the center of hallway, placed next to each other, in front of room [ROOM NUMBER], both carts had lids that were attached. Resident #26 (R26) On 3/13/23 at 7:28 AM, R26's door to his room was open, a Droplet precautions sign was posted on the door, and personal protection equipment kit was hanging on the door that included gloves and gowns. R26 was observed lying in bed on left side. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was observed giving oral medication and told R26 she was going to apply his medication patch on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor respiratory status for one (R51) of one reviewed, resulting in R51 being discovered unresponsive and pronounced deceased . Findings include: A Progress Note for [DATE] at 11:58 PM reflected R51 arrived to the facility, from the hospital, via ambulance, at 11:10 PM. The ambulance company reported R51 was hypoxic (low oxygen level), with an oxygen saturation level in the 70's. The note further reflected the ambulance company applied a non-rebreather mask (delivers high concentrations of oxygen) and gave instructions to begin BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure/machine that helps breathing) upon arrival to the facility. BiPAP was initiated with four liters of oxygen per minute. R51's oxygen saturation remained in the 70's, and their respiratory rate was 30 breaths per minute. R51's oxygen was increased to ten liters per minute. Their oxygen saturation increased to 82 percent (%), their respiratory rate was 34 breaths per minute, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tow out of two emergency (ER) crash carts (used to house CPR -Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation equipment) were checked daily and stocked with life sustaining items. Record review of an ER CART AUDIT FORM/CHECK LIST, placed on a crash cart on the Meadows Unit, and another on the Rehab/Nursing Unit, documented all the items required to be on each of the crash carts upon nursing performing a nightly check of the crash carts. The form revealed, Initial when checked at the top of the form. Observation of the Meadows Unit crash cart revealed a one-liter bag of normal saline (NS) that did not have a sticker on it, nor did it have an expiration date. Upon returning to the same crash cart at 4:00 PM for another observation revealed that the crash cart was missing the blood pressure cuff, paper, one IV (intravenous) start kit, one 1-liter bag of normal saline, and one 500 milliliters (ML) bag of 5% dextrose.Per the ER CART AUDIT FORM/CHECK LIST…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living for one resident (R200) of three dependent residents reviewed.Findings include:Review of the clinical record revealed R200 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: malnutrition, postprocedural complications and disorders of digestive system and had an abdominal surgical wound present. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R200 scored 13/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition). In a telephone interview with Family Member K on 2/05/26 at 8:31 AM, it was reported that R200 did not receive assistance getting showers while in the facility and was often found to be soiled with urine and not cleaned up for the day.A review of the shower logs for R200, provided by the facility revealed R200 did not receive a shower or bed bath until 12/22/25, 11 days after her admission. A review of R200's progress notes did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer one (R200) of three residents reviewed, resulting in an injury.Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R200 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: malnutrition, postprocedural complications and disorders of digestive system and had an abdominal surgical wound present. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R200 scored 13/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition).In a telephone interview with Family Member K on 2/5/26 at 8:31 AM, it was reported that R200 sustained 2 skin tears while being transferred back into bed on 12/22/25 and continued to require at home wound care services for them. A review of incident report for R200, dated 12/22/25, revealed the following:Nursing description: Resident noted to have skin tears to her bilateral calves on the lateral aspects of each leg. Resident reports feeling some mild pain in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently use required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).Findings include:On 2/4/26 at approximately 10 am, Regional Clinical Director A reported that surgical masks were being worn throughout the building due to multiple cases of nausea and vomiting.Review of the clinical record revealed R202 was admitted into the facility on 3/5/25 with diagnoses that included: malnutrition and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R202 scored 12/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated moderately impaired cognition).On 2/4/26 at 12:35 PM, a contact precaution sign was observed on the exterior of R202's room door, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D was observed entering then exiting R202's room with only a surgical mask on. On 2/4/26 at 12:37 PM CNA D and CNA C were both observed entering R202's room with only a surgical mask on. On 2/4/26 at 12:39 PM CNA C exited R202's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2698300 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act.Findings Include: Review of the medical record reflected R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflected R10 scored 5 out of 15 (severe impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the medical record reflected R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Unspecified dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflected R30 scored 9 out of 15 (moderately impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). According to the Facility Reported Incident Report, R30 was observed grabbing R10's foot. R30 was redirected and provided bathroom assistance. During care, R30 began…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2682852Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1) ensure proper medication management, 2) accurate documentation, 3) recognize a change in condition and 4) adherence to physician orders for two (Resident #20, Resident #40) in three reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Resident #20Review of the medical record reflected Resident #20 (R20) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease dependent on dialysis and disorder of phosphorus metabolism. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/28/25, reflected R20 scored 13 out of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a cognitive screening tool. R20 no longer resided in the facility.Review of R20's physician orders revealed an active order for transport to dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. An additional order instructed staff to notify the physician of missed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2682852Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain required dialysis coordination and communication documentation for two (Resident #20 and Resident #40) out of three reviewed for dialysis. Findings include:Resident #20Review of the medical record reflected Resident #20 (R20) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease dependent on dialysis and disorder of phosphorus metabolism. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/28/25, reflected R20 scored 13 out of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a cognitive screening tool. R20 no longer resided in the facility.Review of R20's physician orders revealed an active order for transport to dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. An additional order instructed staff to notify the physician of missed dialysis appointments and obtain R20's weight.According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2682852 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for one (Resident #20) of three reviewed for accurate medical records. Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected Resident (R20) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease dependent on dialysis and disorder of phosphorus metabolism. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/28/25, reflected R20 scored 13 out of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a cognitive screening tool. R20 no longer resided in the facility.Review of the physician's orders revealed Sevelamer HCl Oral Tablet 800 milligrams, three tablets by mouth three times daily with meals for chronic kidney disease. Sevelamer is used to treat hyperphosphatemia (excess phosphate in the blood) in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis. The order was active from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00150737. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were responded to in a timely manner for five (R24, R26, R37, R42 and R43), from a census of 54 residents. Findings include: Resident #37 (R37): Review of the medical record reflected R37 admitted to the facility 12/20/23 and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/10/25, reflected R37 scored 12 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 06/02/25 at 3:41 PM, R37 was observed seated in a recliner, in their room. Approximately three times per week, on third shift, they waited about 30 minutes for staff to answer their call light to use the urinal. On first and second shift, they waited 15 to 30 minutes to get out of bed. R37 reported the facility was understaffed and did they best they could.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) were provided accurately and timely to two Residents (R#25 and R#107) of three reviewed. Findings include: Resident #25 Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 25 (R25) was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] utilizing Medicare part A benefits. Review of the NOMNC for R25 reflected a last covered day under Medicare A would be 4/16/25. The NOMNC was signed by R25 on 4/15/25, thus not giving the required time frame for the notice . Review of the SNF ABN, also signed by R25 on 4/15/25 revealed R25 would be billed privately starting 4/18/25. Resident #107 Review of the clinical, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) record reflected Resident 107 (R107) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the NOMNC for R107 reflected a last covered day under Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for one resident (#49) of 14 resident reviewed. Findings included: Resident #49 (R49) Review of the medical record demonstrated R49 was admitted to the facility 04/16/2025 with diagnoses that included fracture of right tibia (the larger of the two bones in the lower leg), infection at surgical site, cellulitis (bacterial infection) of left upper limb, chronic pain, osteoarthritis (degenerative joint) of right knee and right hip, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, malnutrition, depression, prediabetes, gastro-esophageal reflux, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies (Lewy Body Dementia), anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/22/2025, revealed R49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. During observation and interview on 06/02/2025 at 11:26 a.m. R49 was observed sitting up in a recliner chair at bedside. R49 explained that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide failed to provide meaningful, individualized activities for one resident (#49) of one resident reviewed for activities. Findings included: Resident #49 (R49) Review of the medical record demonstrated R49 was admitted to the facility 04/16/2025 with diagnoses that included fracture of right tibia (the larger of the two bones in the lower leg), infection at surgical site, cellulitis (bacterial infection) of left upper limb, chronic pain, osteoarthritis (degenerative joint) of right knee and right hip, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, malnutrition, depression, prediabetes, gastro-esophageal reflux, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies (Lewy Body Dementia), anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/22/2025, revealed R49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. During observation and interview on 06/02/2025 at 11:26 a.m. R49 was observed sitting up in a recliner chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage of medications for two residents (#2, #3) out of 54 current residents residing at the facility and failed to label mediation in accordance with accepted professional standards, dating of open multi-dose medication, observed in one medication room out of three medication rooms reviewed. Findings included: Resident #3 (R3): Review of the medical record demonstrated R3 was admitted to the facility 04/04/2025 with diagnoses that included cellulitis (bacterial infection) of left lower limb, psoriasis (condition in which skin cells build up and form scales and itchy, dry patches) , type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease (build-up of fats in artery walls), hypertension, sleep apnea, asthma, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), glaucoma (group of eye conditions that damage the optic nerve), fibromyalgia (wide spread musculoskeletal pain) , irritable bowel syndrome, sepsis (condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00150266. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (R1) of three reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, contracture of muscle, and presence of other specified devices. Review of the comments entered for the diagnoses of presence of other specified devices revealed R1 had a baclofen pump that was placed on [DATE]. R1 died in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the records obtained from the physician's office that managed R1's baclofen pump revealed R1's last appointment was on [DATE]. At that time, R1's baclofen dose was decreased from 175.7 mg/hr to 96.1 mcg/hr. The note revealed the next low reservoir alarm date was scheduled for [DATE], but the alarm was turned off as R1 was receiving hospice care. The note indicated refill pump before: [DATE], which indicated the pump would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00150266. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and monitoring of a baclofen pump (implanted device that delivers the baclofen, a muscle relaxant medication, directly into the spinal fluid) for one (R1) of three reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, contracture of muscle, and presence of other specified devices. Review of the comments entered for the diagnoses of presence of other specified devices revealed R1 had a baclofen pump that was placed on [DATE]. R1 died in the facility on [DATE]. In a telephone interview on [DATE] at 9:16 AM, Family Member P reported R1 last had an appointment related to their baclofen pump on [DATE] at which time the physician decreased the baclofen dose and turned off all pump alarms. Family Member P reported the medication was scheduled to be completely used and the reservoir empty by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: (1) effectively clean and maintain food service equipment, (2) date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products, and (3) effectively date, label, and store food products effecting 55 residents, resulting in the increased potential for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, resident foodborne illness, and inadequate mechanical dish machine sanitization final rinse dispersion. Findings include: On 06/06/24 at 08:28 A.M., A comprehensive tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Manager E. The following items were noted: The Mechanical Dish Machine wash and final rinse temperature gauges were observed loose-to-mount and fogged with excessive moisture accumulation. The final rinse Pounds-Per-Square-Inch (PSI) gauge was also observed 90% full of water and reading off-scale beyond 30 (PSI) during the final rinse cycle. Dietary Manager E indicated he would contact maintenance for necessary repairs. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 4-501.11 states: (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 55 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased air quality. Findings include: On 06/07/24 at 09:25 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Maintenance Technician G and Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services F. The following items were noted: Nursing Unit Nurses Station: 1 of 2 chairs were observed with (worn, torn, etched) armrests. The hand sink basin backsplash board was also observed (etched, scored, raised). The caulking bead was further observed loose-to-mount and missing periodically. The damaged backsplash board measured approximately 4-inches-wide by 6-feet-long. Beauty Shop: The cosmetology chair was observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust and dirt deposits. Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services F indicated she would have staff thoroughly clean and sanitize the cosmetology chair as soon as possible. Rehabilitation Unit Nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure two residents (#3 and #37) who had not been deemed incapacitated were acting as their own responsible party; and 2) ensure code status wishes were being honored for one (Resident #37) of two reviewed. Findings include: Resident #37 (#37): Review of the medical record reflected R37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, depression and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R37 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R37's medical record reflected a Physician's Order for full code (cardiopulmonary resuscitation/CPR and life-saving efforts in an emergency). The miscellaneous section of R37's medical record reflected a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) document with an upload and effective date of [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:31 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for two (Resident #37 and Resident #54) of 13 reviewed. Findings include: Resident #54 (R54) Review of the medical record revealed R54 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Discharge Summary revealed R54 discharged home on 3/15/24. Review of the Discharge MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/15/24 revealed R54 discharged to the hospital. In an interview on 06/06/24 at 10:28 AM, MDS Coordinator D reported R54 discharged home and agreed the discharge MDS was coded incorrectly. Resident #37 (R37): Review of the medical record reflected R37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, depression and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/27/24, reflected R37 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00140368. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights according to Physician Orders and prevent significant weight loss for one (Resident #4) of three reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #4 (R4) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of right pubis, nondisplaced fracture (broken bone that maintains proper alignment) of 5th metatarsal bone (bone on outer edge of foot) of left foot, nondisplaced fracture of anterior (front) wall of the right acetabulum (socket part of hip joint), dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R4 discharged from the facility on 9/28/23 and did not reside in the facility at the time of the survey. R4's August 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) reflected a Physician's Order, with a start date of 8/26/23 and a discontinue date of 10/2/23, for R4 to be weighed daily for three days through 8/27/23. The same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) provided services for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of emergent or routine care with negative clinical outcomes affecting all 50 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 3/14/23 at 3:30 PM, the daily staff sheet was observed posted on the desk at the front entrance. Review of the daily staffing sheets revealed the facility did not have a RN that provided services on 2/17/23, 2/23/23, 2/26/23, 2/28/23, 3/7/23, 3/9/23, 3/10/23, 3/11/23, and 3/12/23. In an interview on 03/15/23 at 1:39 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported Scheduler J and Human Resources Director (HRD) K worked on the nursing department schedules together. DON B reported it had been a couple months since she had to cover a nursing shift. On 03/15/23 at 2:33 PM, DON B reported she did not work at all last week and was off starting 3/3/23 and returned to work on 3/13/23. In an interview on 03/15/23 at 1:43 PM, Scheduler J…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-21 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct routine Covid-19 testing on all facility employees in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and local Public Health Department guidelines during the facilities current Covid-19 outbreak resulting in the potential and likely hood for Covid-19 to spread in the facility and placing the residents at risk for acquiring Covid-19 in a current facility census of 50 residents. Findings Included: In an interview on 03/16/2023 at 09:11 a.m. Director of Nursing (DON) B explained that the facilities most recent outbreak of Covid-19 occurred on February 27, 2023. She explained that on that date four residents and two employees were positive for Covid-19. She further explained that after reviewing the correlating data regarding the outbreak they had made the determination that the outbreak originated with the staff. DON B explained that routine rapid Covid -19 testing was initiated for residents at that time. DON B explained that rapid Covid-19 testing is completed weekly on all residents. When asked if employees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-21 · tag F0895 — widespread
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a compliance and ethics program resulting in the potential for criminal, civil, and administrative violations with the potential to affect all 50 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Compliance and Ethics Program policy revealed, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. As part of the facility's culture of compliance, established standards of conduct apply to everyone involved in the company. 2. The facility maintains a designated compliance and ethics program contact to which individuals may report suspected violations, as well as an alternate method of reporting suspected violations anonymously without fear of retribution. 3. All staff, including individuals providing services under a contract and as a volunteer, committing violations of the compliance and ethics program will be subject to disciplinary actions, up to and including termination. 4. Components of the facility's compliance and ethics program include: a. Written compliance and ethics standards, policies, and procedures. b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in place for one (Resident #153) of 13 reviewed, resulting in a missed meal when Resident #153 was not able to call and notify staff that she had not been served breakfast. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #153 (R153) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, and pneumonia. R153's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. Review of the Dietary Care Plan revealed R153 ate all of her meals in her room and that she requested very soft foods. On 03/13/23 at 3 09:18 AM, R153 was observed sitting in a recliner in her room. R153 yelled help. R153 stated, I would like to have my call button, but it's way over there. R153 pointed to her bed which was across the room. The call light was observed clipped to R153's bed and out of reach. R153 stated, I just want my call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete at Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident #31) of 13 reviewed, resulting in an inaccurate MDS assessment and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 (R31) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the Resident Profile revealed R31 received dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Review of the Significant Change MDS with and Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/10/23 revealed R153 was not coded as receiving dialysis services. In an interview on 03/14/23 at 12:28 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the MDS nurse who coded R31's MDS was no longer employed by the facility. DON B reported R31 had received dialysis services since before admission and therefore the MDS should have been coded as receiving dialysis services.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers on admission and regularly for one resident (#23) of one resident's reviewed for the assessment and monitoring of pressure ulcers resulting in the potential for resident's pressure ulcers to worsen or be provided proper treatments to promote healing. Finding Included: Resident #23 (R23) Review of the medical record revealed R23 was originally admitted to the facility 09/01/2018 and re-admitted [DATE] (following a recent hospital stay) with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (brain disfunction), cellulitis left lower limb, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart disease (CHF), chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, vascular dementia, insomnia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, aortic valve stenosis, anemia (low blood volume), vitamin D deficiency, gastro-esophageal reflux, major depression, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood) , gout (high uric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain medications were given as ordered for one (resident #157) of one reviewed, resulting in increased pain and the potential for unmanaged pain. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #157 (R157) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy, peritonitis, acute cholecystitis, and major depressive disorder. R157's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. Review of R157's hospital discharge medication list revealed oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 5 milligrams (mg), take one tablet every four hours for pain. Review of the Physician's Order dated 3/7/23 and discontinued 3/8/23 revealed an order for oxycodone HCl 5 mg every four hours as needed for pain for 7 days. Review of the Physician's Order dated 3/8/23 revealed an order for oxycodone HCl 5m every four hours as needed for pain. On 03/13/23 at 08:11 AM, R157 was observed lying in bed. R157 reported at 2:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the sole facility medication room and that one facility supply room were free of expired medications resulting in the potential for decreased medication efficacy and adverse side effects in a current facility census of 50 residents. Findings include: On 3/14/23 at 10:51 AM, the facility supply room located on Meadow Hall was reviewed in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E. During the review, five 1000ml (milliliter) bags of 0.45% (percent) Sodium Chloride Injection with an EXP (expiration) 02/23 date indicated were noted within a cardboard box on the floor of the supply room. LPN E confirmed that the intravenous solution was expired and would be removed from the supply room for disposal. On 3/14/23 at 11:39 AM, the medication room located on the facilities rehabilitation unit was reviewed in the presence of LPN M. During the review, nine 5ml Heparin Lock Flush Solution syringes with an expiration date of 2023-02-28 were noted in a plastic zip lock bag within a cupboard. Within the same cupboard, two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed initiate antibiotic use protocols and monitor antibiotic use, in one of one reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident #6), resulting in the increased risk for adverse events associated with antibiotic use, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) In review of R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/19/23, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents) score of 03 (00-07 Severely Impaired). In review of R6's February 2023's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Amoxicillin 500 milligrams (mg) was ordered on 2/20/23 and to be administered every 12 hours, at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM. The physician order did not specify a stop date or indication for use. Amoxicillin was started on 2/21/23 at 9:00 PM. The February 2023 MAR revealed 3 doses without any documentation: 2/23/23 at 9:00 PM, 2/24/23 at 9:00 AM, and 2/24/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolated
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident families and representatives of COVID-19 infections in the facility in one of one reviewed for notification (Resident #6), resulting in not fully prepared for status prior to visit and lack of involvement in the resident care plan. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) In review of R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/19/23, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents) score of 03 (00-07 Severely Impaired). In review of facility list provided on 3/13/23, R6 was positive for COVID-19 on 3/03/23. Resident Representative (RR) F was interviewed on 3/13/23 at 11:41 AM and stated she had concern regarding infection control practices in the facility and that she was not contacted after last COVID-19 outbreak. RR F stated she would have preferred to have known there was an outbreak in the facility before planning a visit. RR F stated she typically visited twice a week but would choose not to visit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-03-21 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately report staffing information, resulting in inaccurate data and the potential for unidentified staffing concerns. Findings include: In an interview on 03/15/23 at 1:43 PM, Staff Member J reported she was the facility's scheduler and wound nurse. Staff Member J identified herself as a Registered Nurse (RN). When asked why the staff list identified her as a Nurse Grad, Staff Member J reported she still had to take her nursing boards. Staff Member J reported she was not licensed as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or RN. Review of Staff Member J's personnel file revealed she was a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with certification effective 2/28/22 until 2/28/24. In an interview on 03/20/23 at 10:06 AM, Administrator in Training (AIT) C reported herself and the Business Office reported the payroll-based journal data. AIT C reported she believed Staff Member J was reported as Nurse Admin. Review of Individual Daily Staffing Report dated 10/1/22 to 12/31/22 revealed Staff Member J was reported as a RN on 10/13/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEXCARE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2024
MILLER, CASIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ROBIN EISENBERG 2014 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
BRANSCUM, JAMESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
EISENBERG, LEOIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PERRY, MICHAELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
SANGSTER, TODDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
WRONSKI, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
YALAVARTHI, JYOTHSNAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-32.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$420K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 10%Other / private 22%

This home reported $420K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$470per resident / day
operating cost
$14,291per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$355per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235574. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next