Fairlane Senior Care and Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 61% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 152.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-09-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage, medical supplies, yard refuse debris, for one opened dumpster top, affecting all residents, staff and visitors, resulting in the potential for the harborage of pests and insects.Findings include:On 9/2/25 at 07:35am, two dumpster containers were observed near the building with separate top lids. The dumpster on the right-side was observed with its lid opened, exposing multiple boxes, loose paper, and tree branches. In between the dumpster and the compressor was a wheelbarrow filled with tree branches, pieces of cardboard, leaves, and loose papers. Behind the compressor was a fence with leaves, paper, Styrofoam cups, plastic water bottles, medical gloves, yellow face mask and broken tree branches. In front of the dumpster and compressor were yellow medical face masks, examination gloves, multiple cigarette butts, pieces of paper and pieces of cardboard, and small tree branches. There were also flies swarming around the dumpsters. No staff were observed near the dumpster area.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a specialty call light was within reach of one resident (R59) out of ten residents reviewed for call light, resulting in unmet care needs. On 9/2/2025 at 10:39 a.m., R59 was observed lying in bed with a specialty call light (can be used by the resident only with the shoulders and the back of the head) pinned to the bed covers on the right side of the bed. During an interview, R59 reported trying to get staff attention for about half an hour since no staff had been in the room to have oral care provided and to be assisted with getting up out of bed. During the interview and observation, R59 confirmed the call light was unable to be used by hands, only with the shoulder and the back of the head. R59 stated, I have difficulties using a regular call light because my arms don't move to get it.On 9/2/2025 at 10:42 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C (R59's assigned nurse) said during an interview that R59 can't use the call light by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR-determines whether or not an individual who has a diagnosis of Mental Illness or Intellectual/Developmental Disability [ID/DD] meets the criteria for a nursing home and they're needs are met) Level I (3877) was completed for two residents (R6 and R160) out of five residents reviewed for PASSARs. Findings include:R6A review of R6's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not reveal the current 3877 form. There was not a Mental Illness/Intellectual/Developmental Disability/Related condition exemption Criteria Certification (DCH-3878) form. (The DCH-3878 is a State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) form used to claim exemption for level ll screening). R6 was admitted to facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of Dementia, and Suicidal Ideations. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00153194. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain one resident's (R101) right to privacy and confidentiality when a staff member posted a video of the resident on social media without their or their Legal Guardian's consent. Findings include: The State Agency (SA) received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) and a Complaint that a video had been temporarily posted on a social media site unbeknownst to the resident or their Legal Guardian. On 6/3/25 at approximately 10:30 AM the Nursing Home Administrator said R101's family informed them that on 5/18/25 the resident's image had been posted on a staff member's social media site for a short period of time before it was deleted. During an immediate investigation it was confirmed the video had been temporarily posted on a staff member's social media site and the SA was notified. The video was viewed and revealed the resident was seated in a wheelchair fully clothed in a common area by themselves yelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a qualified social worker to meet resident psychosocial, mental and behavioral health needs. This has the potential to affect all residents who reside in the nursing facility. Findings include: 09/11/24 01:12 PM, Social Work Tech (SWT) A was interview regarding her current position. Social Work Tech (A) said she was the Activities Assistant prior to her current position. SWT A reported they had been a Social Work Tech since April of 2024. 09/11/24 at 01:32 PM, the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed regarding the facility employing a qualifed Social Worker and explained at this time they (facility) do not have a social worker. The ADON said nor do they have a Corporate Social Worker at this time. 09/11/24 at 04:10 PM, an interview with Social Work Tech B revealed they have worked at the facility since February of 2024. Social Work Tech B said she does not have a bachelor's degree. Hence, Social Work Tech B does not meet the minimum qualifications. On 9/12/24 at 09:45 AM, an interview with the Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate temperature monitoring of the facility's hot water holding tanks, resulting in the potential for inadequate water temperatures to go undetected that could cause the growth and spread of waterborne pathogens. Findings include: On 9/11/24 beginning at 3:22 PM, an interview and record review were conducted with Maintenance Director C and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) regarding the monitoring of the facility's hot water holding tanks. Maintenance Director C said the facility had three hot water holding tanks that were monitored weekly. Two tanks were located in the [NAME] boiler room and one tank was located in the East boiler room. The hot water holding tank temperature logs for April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024 were reviewed and only documented the water temperature of the East boiler room tank. The Maintenance Director did not provide documentation of the temperature readings for the two tanks located in the [NAME] boiler room. The NHA said the temperatures of all three boilers should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure aPreadmission Screening and Resident Review, (PASARR) II was completed for one R114 of three residents reviewed for PASARR's resulting in the potential for unmet mental health needs. Findings include: Record review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R114 admitted in to the facility on 2/23/24 with pertinent diagnosis of bipolar disorder. A care plan dated 9/11/2024 noted R114 was on antidepressant medications. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) noted R114 was administered duloxetine (antidepressant) for bipolar disorder. The resident had an initial, PASARR dated 11/6/2023 on file which stated R114 did not have mental illness. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed R114's Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS) of 11/15 (moderately impaired cognition.) 09/11/24 01:12 PM, the Social Work Tech (SWT) A was asked if R114 should have a PASSAR II and said they would check and see if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food allergies for one resident (R240) of 28 reviewed for dining. Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 10:51 AM, R240 was asked about the food at the facility. R240 reported, Yesterday they had shrimp on my plate and I'm allergic to that (shrimp). A review of R240 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) profile noted, Allergies: Iodine, Shell Fish, diagnostic x-ray materials. Further review of R240's EMR noted, R240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure. A review of R240's admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], noted R240 with an intact cognition. Care plan reviewed and allergies are noted on the care plan Iodine, Shell Fish, diagnostic x-ray materials. A review of the facility's dinner menu titled, Spring Summer 2024 Dinner: Monday Shrimp & grits, Collard Greens, Cornbread, Peach Cobbler. A review of R240's meal ticket dated 9/9/24 noted, Meal Period: Week 2 Monday Dinner,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI000143957 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three (R101, R102 and R103) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs resulting in unmet care needs. Findings include: R101 On 5/17/2024 at 9:30 AM R101 was observed in bed with bedside table approximately two feet from head of bed. When asked can you reach for your water on your bedside table R101 replied I can't reach it and demonstrated limited arm movement. When asked can you use your call light R101 said he didn't know where it was. R101's call light was observed at the head of bed between the mattress and headboard. Record review of R101's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admitted to facility on 9/13/2023 with most recent readmission on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R101 revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15 intact cognition and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform and document neurological checks per physician's order for one resident (R507) of three resident reviewed for falls. Findings include: A review of R507's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R507 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R507 had the following medical diagnoses: Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Seizures, Dementia, Difficulty Walking, and a History of Falling. A review of R507's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R507 could not be assessed for a Brief Interview of Mental Status. According to the Quarterly MDS, R507 had impairment to their left upper extremity. A review of R507's ADL care plan dated 4/7/23 revealed the following interventions: Ambulation: non-ambulatory .Wheelchair w/footrest for locomotion .transfer: 1 person assist. A review of R507's incident report dated 2/2/24 revealed the following: R507 had an unwitnessed fall. R507 was observed by the Nurse C on the floor with a bedside table in hand.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI