Father Murray, A Villa Center
8444 Engleman, Center Line, MI 48015 · For profit - Corporation · 231 certified beds · (586) 755-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.1% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.3% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.3% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.69 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 7% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.3%CMS range 26.5–50.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.3–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 79.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 79.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.0–14.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 231 beds and averages 209.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00142477 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by staff, affecting one resident (Resident #135) of five residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in R135 experiencing physical and psychosocial harm as determined by the reasonable person concept. Findings include: Resident #135 (R135): An allegation of staff-to-resident abuse involving Staff N and R135 was submitted to the state agency. On 2/27/24 at 3:49 PM, R135 was observed lying in bed. R135's room was observed to be located near the locked visitor bathrooms and near the front lobby. The resident when asked if they remembered the incident involving security guard (Staff N) on or around 1/29/24. R135 stated, No and shook their head side to side. Resident did not remember anything about the incident. On 02/28/24 at 09:25 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA L), who was a witness to the incident was interviewed. CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, homelike environment affecting two residents (R73 and R17) of three reviewed for environment. Findings include:R73On 06/23/26 at 9:50 AM, R73 was observed sitting in their wheelchair next to the bed. When asked about concerns, R73 pointed to areas on their wall and stated, I'm in my room most of the time and must look at this. Even when visitors come, they have to see this. R73 stated that they reported this concern to nursing months ago. Several deep nicks in the drywall and peeling paint were observed on the wall and multiple areas on wall around the room. A record review revealed that R73 was admitted on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses of Major Depressive disorder, Anxiety and Hypertension. R73's Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment (BIMS) score was 15/15, indicating intact cognition.R17On 06/23/26 at 10:15 AM, R17 was observed lying in bed looking at television. R17 was unable to respond when asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify or provide one resident (R194) or their representative of a bed hold (a policy on how a resident's bed will be held or reserved while they are absent from the facility) upon transfer to the hospital out of two residents reviewed for hospital discharges. Findings include:Review of R194's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed progress notes regarding R194's discharge to the hospital on 6/16/26 for catheter related complications with admission back into the facility on 6/20/26. No documentation was found to indicate they or their representative was provided with the facility's bed hold policy upon this discharge to the hospital.Further review of R194's EMR revealed they were admitted to the facility 9/13/2023 with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), major depressive disorder, and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage of the urinary tract). R194's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely for two residents (R18 and R215) of 12 residents reviewed. Findings include:A review of the survey MDS task revealed 12 residents with assessments overdue by 120 days. On [DATE] at 12:18 PM, the surveyor asked the nurses in the MDS office about 12 overdue MDS assessments and requested follow-up on why they are triggering as incomplete. On [DATE] at 3:15 PM, MDS Nurse H explained that resident R18 and R215's MDS assessments had been overlooked and not completed. The other 10 were clerical errors which had previously been remedied. A review of R18's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Encephalopathy and Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Their MDS was due on [DATE] and had not been completed. A review of R215's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Sepsis and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for one resident (R39) of three reviewed for care plans. Findings include: A review of R39's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 5/22/14, with a readmission date of 9/30/25 with diagnoses of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) and Adult Failure to Thrive. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required dependence with activities of daily living. A review of R39's skin integrity care plan noted the following, .The resident has actual impairment .Left outer lateral heel stage 2 (partial thickness loss of dermis), Right lateral lower leg Vascular, right lateral ankle vascular/Right heel eschar vascular, left heel eschar vascular, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive .Date Initiated: 02/20/2025. Interventions: .12. Heel protectors . On 06/23/2026 at 10:12 AM, 1:43 PM, and 3:39 PM, R39 was observed in bed on their back, their feet flat on the bed with no heel protectors in use. Due to R39's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan intervention for one resident (R24) out of three reviewed for care plans. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed R24 admitted into the facility on 3/21/2022 with the following medical diagnoses, adjustment disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R24 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of an active care plan noted the following, Focus: I speak limited English. I speak Chinese as my primary language, but can understand some English.Goal: The resident will be able to make basic needs known by.using communication board.Interventions: The resident is able to communicate by: using communication board at bedside.On 6/24/2026 at 11:50 AM, a communication board was not noted to be at R24's bedside. R24 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply soft lift heel boots for one resident (R9) out of one reviewed for physician orders. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed R9 admitted into the facility on 2/6/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Anoxic Brain Damage. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating R9 was unable to complete the assessment. R9 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfer. Further review of current physician's orders revealed the following, Soft heel lift boots when up in chair and bed.Every shift for wound care management.Further review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of June 2026 noted a checkmark for day shift and night shift indicating the soft heel lift boots had been applied daily.On 6/23/2026 at 11:41 AM, 12:00 PM, and 3:45 PM, R9 was observed lying in bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow provide oversight during medication administration for one resident (R904) of one reviewed for professional standards of practice. Findings include:On 4/22/2026 at 11:27 AM, R904 was observed sitting on the side of their bed placing pills from a medication cup into their mouth. R904 was asked about the pills they were taking and was unable to identify individual pills. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R904 was admitted into the facility on 3/17/2025 with pertinent diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (stroke). Further review revealed the resident had an intact cognition. A review of 904's medical record noted the following active physician orders: Amlodipine Besylate (used to treat high blood pressure) Oral tablet 10mg (milligrams) - one time a day for Hypertension (HTN). Hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 100 mmHg (millimeters of mercury, a unit of pressure) or diastolic blood pressure Is less than 60 mmHg. Metoprolol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake number 2809219.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by facility staff for one (R900) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:An allegation of staff to resident abuse involving Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and R900 was submitted to the State Agency.A review of the medical record revealed a progress note dated 3/13/25 at 10:10 PM authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, Observed (name of R904) looking through the personal items of their roommate without their knowledge, (name of R904) became angry pushing (name of LPN B) on the shoulder telling them to mind their own business. A progress note dated 3/14/26, documented, (Name of CNA A) attempted to redirect (name of R904) to their room when (name of R904) began swiping items off the nursing desk to the floor. (Name of CNA A) continued to attempt to redirect (name of resident R904) back to their room when the resident began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake 2699034Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (R904) from sexual abuse from another resident (R903) out of five reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) noted the following, Incident summary: During post lunch rounds, resident [R904] observed in the room of [R903]. Both residents were engaged in oral sexual contact that was interrupted by the assigned CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant]. [R904] demonstrates cognitive impairments related to [their] dx. Both residents remain in the facility. No injury. Behavior did not progress beyond this contact. [R903] is currently under enhanced supervision until investigation is complete and care plan updates can occur.On 12/22/2025 at 11:07 AM, R903 was observed lying in bed. CNA A was noted to be sitting outside the door and stated they were R903's 1:1 assigned supervision. R903 reported they were friendly with R904 in the past, and they would speak often. R903 reported R904 came in their room and laid in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2609700.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to schedule a follow up consultation appointment for one resident (R903) out one reviewed for appointments. Findings include:On 11/20/2025 at 10:38 AM, an interview was conducted with R903. R903 reported they have been trying to get to an appointment that they were referred to by their neurologist. R903 reported the follow up appointment was in their discharge paperwork from the hospital, as well as an order that was recently entered by the facility's Nurse Practitioner (NP). R903 reported they hadn't heard anything about the appointment and when they would be going, and they were starting to get worried.A review of the medical record revealed R903 admitted into the facility on 7/31/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Spina Bifida and Presence of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Device. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2598400 and 2609700. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in one of one bathroom on the 100 unit, and in two of four shower rooms. Findings include:On 11/20/25 at 9:20 AM, the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed to have an area of built-up black soil, wall to wall on the floor behind the toilet. This had not been cleaned up prior to survey exit.On 11/20/25 at 9:40 AM and 1:04 PM, observation of the one south shower room revealed: The toilet had what looked like rust stains down from the lip of the bowl to the floor on the right side of toilet; black scratch marks also appeared on the rim of the toilet; The first stall to the left had two EKG (electrocardiogram) leads and a used Tegaderm (wound dressing) on the floor; The second stall had a soap bottle cap on the floor and the third stall had a (soap scum) soiled plastic bag attached to the left arm of the shower chair with a draw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 2567551Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor one resident's self-determination rights (R701) of one reviewed for resident rights. Findings include:A review of R701's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. Further review revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment, and was independent for bed mobility, dressing, and required minimal assistance for bathing. On 8/11/25 at 10:19 AM, R701 was observed lying in bed and asked about their stay in the facility. They expressed dissatisfaction with the facility food and medication regimen, in addition to their frustration with remaining in the facility. R701 explained their son has guardianship over them and have been feeling powerless as if they are incapable of living independently. Further review of the medical record revealed the following progress notes:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00153991. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and inform resident representative about changes in skin integrity for one sampled resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for informed rights. Findings include: On 7/8/25 at 10:16 AM, confidential Family Member A explained that upon visiting R901 on 6/28/25, they observed the resident with bandages on their right foot. Family Member A explained they were not informed the resident had open wounds to their foot, and the wounds were not present during their last visitation on 6/9/25. A review of R901's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/29/25 with diagnoses which included Dementia, Hypertension and Diabetes. Further review revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and required 1-2-person assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed the following progress note: 6/13/2025 19:01 (7:01pm) Health Status Note .Writer observed a small open sore, slightly bleeding. Writer notified Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for one (R121) of eight residents reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R121 revealed an admission date of 01/15/21 with diagnoses including Cerebrovascular Accident, Hemiplegia, and Diabetes Mellitus. On 04/07/25 at 11:12 AM, R121 was observed laying in bed. They did not respond to verbal greeting. The wallpaper under the window adjacent to the resident's right side was peeled off in a large (approx. two feet by two feet) area with a portion of the peeled paper hanging and another portion missing. There were multiple smears on the wall in the same area that appeared to be food or drink. On 04/08/25 at 9:05 AM, R121 was observed laying in bed. The wall adjacent to the bed was in the same condition as noted the previous day. R121 was asked about the condition of the room and they stated The clock doesn't work either, it needs a battery. I told them and they haven't fixed it. The clock was observed to be not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-a form to be completed for all residents Medicare/Medicaid information) in a timely manner for one (R157) of one residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R157 did not have a discharge MDS assessment. The review of the EMR revealed R157 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 12/10/2024. On 4/9/2025 at 9:29 AM, an inquiry was made regarding the submission of a discharge MDS. MDS Nurse E revealed they were unaware of a missing submission and would look into the concern. At 11:29 AM, MDS Nurse E confirmed the discharge MDS submission was overlooked. On 4/9/2025 at 12:15 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the MDS should be submitted in a timely manner.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) Level II Evaluation for three residents (R3, R8, R13) of eight residents reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screen and Resident Review). Findings include: R3 A clinical record review revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Congestive Heart Failure. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15 indicating R3 was cognitively impaired. Further review of R3's medical record revealed a PASARR dated 3/25/24. R8 A clinical record review revealed R8 was originally admitted into the facility on [DATE], with a recent readmission date of 3/17/25 and with the following diagnoses of Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Hoarding Disorder and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. A Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure mouth care was provided for one resident (R137) of four dependent residents reviewed for oral hygiene. Findings include: A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R137 was most recently admitted on [DATE]. The EMR revealed R137 had a pertinent diagnoses of Developmental Disorder of Speech and Language, Cerebral Infarction (Stroke) affecting non-dominant side, Dysphagia (Swallowing Difficulty) and a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastric (PEG tube) insertion for nutritional support. The EMR revealed R137 is non-verbal and on nutritional support via a tube-feeding only. R137 is not to have anything by mouth. The EMR further revealed that R137 was unable to complete the Basic Inventory for Mental Status and was also dependent for all Activities of Daily Living. On 4/7/25 at 10:13 AM, R137 was observed in bed on their back with the legs drawn up to a 90 degrees angle to body. An observation of R137's mouth revealed thick and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not left at the bedside for one resident (R5) of one resident and failed to store/date medication in one of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: R5 On 4/7/25 at 10:46 AM, R5 was observed lying in their bed. A medication cup of seven pills were observed sitting on the resident's bedside table. At this time, the unit manager of the memory care unit, Unit Manager F was asked to enter the resident's room and explain why the medications had been left at the bedside. Unit Manager F explained that the medications should not have been left at the bedside and would talk to the administering nurse. A review of R5's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Delusional Disorders, and Muscle Weakness. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact, and required minimal assistance for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store oxygen mask and tubing in a sanitary manner for one (R98) of four residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use. Findings include: A review of the facility record revealed R98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Respiratory Failure and Seizure Disorder. On 04/07/25 at 2:48 PM, R98's oxygen mask and tubing was observed laying on the concentrator not covered or bagged. On 04/08/25 at 8:55 AM, R98 was observed laying in bed wearing a nasal cannula. The oxygen mask/tubing and a second nasal cannula/tubing were observed laying in the open top drawer of the nightstand on top of other items uncovered and not bagged. On 04/09/25 at 10:48 AM, the facility Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and made aware of the observations of the oxygen mask/tubing and nasal cannula/tubing being stored uncovered and not bagged. The DON reported the expectation is that they should be bagged when not in use. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immunize per acceptable and/or declination for influenza immunizations for one resident (R81) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings Include: A review of R81's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 2/1/24. During a review Infection Control program, the influenza acceptance/declination for R81 was requested and revealed a consent to receive the influenza immunization dated for 10/4/24. Reviewed was a second document dated for 10/10/24 declining the influenza vaccine. A review of the resident's medical record revealed the resident received the influenza immunization on 10/14/24 (four days after declining it). On 4/8/25 at 4:19 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about her expectation regarding immunizations being provided per consent, she explained her expectation is that immunizations are provided per acceptance/declination. A review of the facility's Influenza Vaccination Guideline did not reveal information regarding a resident receiving a vaccine after signing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the education regarding benefits and offering of immunizations (COVID vaccine), and immunize per acceptable and/or declination for three residents (R7, R13, and R63) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings Include: During a review of the Infection Control program, acceptance/declinations of the COVID vaccine were requested for R7, R13, and R63. R7 A review of R7's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/16/16. A review of R7's COVID declination was signed by the resident during the survey on 4/8/25 however, the resident has a guardian responsible for making medical decisions on their behalf. R13 A review of R13's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE]. A review of their medical record revealed the resident refused the vaccine however, the resident completed a COVID acceptance consent. R63 A review of R63's medical record revealed they were admitted into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to Intake MI100147010. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment in one bathroom for two (R907) of two residents assigned to the same room. Findings include: On 9/26/24 at 10:56 AM, in an observation of the bathroom shared between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] the following was observed: -The faucet handles are broken, the cold handle was missing, and the hot water handle was hanging so that the water could not be turned off. -The warm temperatured water was dripping heavily. -The soap dispenser is not working. -There was no toilet paper available in the room and the toilet paper holder rusty. -The toilet seat was loose and slides easily side to side. -There was feces in the toilet and the bowl was not clean. -The tank lid hung over the flush handle making it difficult to access. -There is no trash can in the bathroom or in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 09/26/24 at 09:10 AM, an interview with R907 was attempted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to MI00145143, MI00145149, and MI00145155. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timely follow up by social work and psychiatric services and physician notification for suicidal ideations for one (903) of one residents reviewed for mental health disorders. Findings include: R903 A review of the medical record revealed that R903 admitted into the facility on 3/5/24 with the following diagnoses: schizoaffective disorder and bipolar type. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) revealed, a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15, which indicated R903 with an intact cognition. R903's medical record also noted R903 with a history of multiple suicide attempts. The MDS also revealed a resident mood interview (PHQ depression screen) which revealed, R903 answered they had thoughts of feeling down depressed or hopeless and that they would be better off dead, or of hurting themselves, nearly every day. A consult to psychiatry was ordered on 3/5/24 for schizoaffective disorder and another consult to psychiatry was ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00144520. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (R703) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R704), of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) indicated the following, Resident [R703] was attacked by another resident [R704] .Resident has facial bandages from the attack .Attacker has been removed from the facility temporarily .Unknown if anyone was notified .Staff and residents are fearful of the attacking resident. Date of incident involving R703 and R704 was indicated to be 5/13/24. A review of R704's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a progress noted dated, 5/7/24 10:27 AM, revealed the following, Resident reviewed in risk meeting r/t (regarding) behaviors. Resident displays increased aggression. behaviors. On 1:1 monitoring to maintain all resident's safety. Social work is currently seeking alternative placement that will fit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00144520. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one resident (R703) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) indicated the following, Resident [R703] was attacked by another resident [R704] .Resident has facial bandages from the attack .Attacker has been removed from the facility temporarily .Unknown if anyone was notified .Staff and residents are fearful of the attacking resident. Date of incident involving R703 and R704 was indicated to be 5/13/24. A review of R704's electronic medical revealed that R704 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included UTI (Urinary tract infection) and Dementia. R704's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that R704 had a severely impaired cognition. R704…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure full visual privacy during the care of two residents (R43 and R87), resulting in the exposure of sensitive parts of the residents' bodies to other residents and the potential for embarrassment. Findings include: R87: On 02/27/24 at 4:35 PM, R87 was observed to be in bed covered with a blanket. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) R entered the room, pulled back the covers of the resident to reveal the top of their bare thighs and incontinence brief and moved a pillow from one side of the torso to the other. The door was not closed and the privacy curtain was not drawn. The actions of the CNA were visible from the hallway. CNA R was asked about the observation and CNA R acknowledged they should have drawn the curtain or closed the door. R43: On 02/28/24 at 9:39 AM, an observation of wound care was completed with the wound care nurse and two additional staff. The drape between the beds was open beyond the halfway point of the two resident beds. There was a resident laying in the next bed. During care of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains in part to Intake Numbers MI00140365 and MI00141049. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and kempt environment affecting one resident (Resident 144) of six residents reviewed for environment, and three resident bathrooms. Findings include: On 02/27/24 at 10:51 AM, R144 was observed lying in bed in their room. Areas of large brown stains were observed on the wall behind the bed, on the ceiling, on the curtains and on the heater. On 02/28/24 at 10:07 AM, R144 was observed lying bed. Areas of large brown stains were observed on the wall behind the bed, on the ceiling, on the curtains and on the heater. On 02/29/24 at 11:00 AM, R144 was observed lying in bed. Areas of large brown stains were observed on the wall behind the bed, on the ceiling, on the curtains and on the heater. On 02/29/24 at 11:04 AM, a interview was held with Nurse T and was asked their expectation for the cleanliness of the room. Nurse P stated, My expectation is that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of hospital transfer for one resident, (R201) of one resident reviewed for discharge/transfer. Findings include: A record review revealed that a notification was not sent to the Ombudsman of R201's transfer to the hospital. On 2/29/24 at 2:22 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) emailed, I am not able to provide you with the requested document [notification to Ombudsman] as I do not have access to my former social worker director's email who was emailing the discharges/transfers. On 02/29/2024, the policy for Transfers and Discharges was requested. It was not provided.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete PASARR II (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review II) in a timely manner for two (R73 and R101) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: On 2/28/2024 a record review revealed that R73 did not have a current PASARR II that was due January, 2024. Relevant diagnoses for R73 include: Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Bi-Polar Disorder. On 2/28/2024 a record review revealed that R101 did not have a current PASARR II, that was due August, 2023. Relevant diagnoses for R101 include: Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Bi-Polar Disorder On 2/28/2024, Social Workers (SW E and SW F), were interviewed regarding how PASARR II's are kept track of. SW E related that he is responsible for PASARR II updates and that there is a tickler file on an Excel sheet that is used to keep track of PASARR I and II due dates. SW E acknowledged that PASARR II's were not completed. SW F agreed with that process. On 2/29/24, Social Workers (SW G (Corporate Social Worker) , SW E and SW F), were interviewed for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00140365. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was repositioned timely and appropriately for one resident (R87) of three residents reviewed with wound care needs, resulting in the increased potential for delayed wound healing and wound deterioration. Findings include: Resident #87 (R87): On 02/27/24 at 10:05 AM, 10:49 AM, 11:11 AM, 12:06 PM, 12:31 PM, R87 was observed to be out of bed and seated in a wheelchair in the north dining room. R87 was seated with their buttocks forward from the back of the chair so that the spine curved slightly when R87's shoulders touched the back of the chair. R87 was observed to grip the arms of the wheelchair and rock forward at the shoulders three to five times in succession intermittently while seated in the wheelchair. R87 did not appear to be able to lift their body from the chair or move away from the seat of the wheelchair. At 12:31 PM R87 was pulled up straighter and more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Numbers: MI00140260, MI00140264, and MI00142715. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for one resident (R175) out of 11 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings Include: Resident #175 (R175): On 2/28/24 at 8:57 AM, R175 reported that they have to wait a long time to have their brief changed. R175 stated, It's worse on midnights. R175 explained, that one time they pressed the call light at 1:00 am and didn't get help until almost 9:00 am. R175 further explained, that they have impaired skin on their backside and that a wet brief makes their skin burn. On 2/28/24 at 1:16 PM, R175 was observed lying in bed. The bed sheet was observed to have a large wet circle around R175. The wet circle reached the middle of R175 back to the lower part of R175's legs. R175 was asked how long they had been lying this way. R175 explained they had pressed the call light for assistance, and no one had come…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate wound care interventions for one resident (R352) of four residents reviewed for skin management. Findings include: Resident #352 (R352): On 2/27/24 at 9:27 AM, R352 was observed lying in bed with their feet lying flat on the mattress. They were asked about their stay in the facility and explained that they were admitted the week prior, and had not had anyone wrap or take care of the wounds on their legs until yesterday, 2/26/24. A review of R352's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 2/21/24 with diagnoses that included Peripheral Vascular Disease, Cerebral infarction, Hypertension, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Further review of the medical record revealed that the resident was alert and oriented x 4 (person, place, time, & situation), and required extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed that R352 had the following wounds: Wound #1 Right, Anterior Lower Leg, acute Partial Thickness Venous Ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall for one resident (R109) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Resident #109 (R109): On 2/29/24 at 11:00 AM, a review of R109's incident and accident reports (I/As) since their admission to the facility were reviewed and revealed the following, Incident Description: 2/1/2024 18:29 (6:30 PM) Nurse Description: Resident was placed in dinning room sitting in their w/c (Wheelchair) getting prepared for dinner, resident's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) walked out of the dinning room leaving resident sitting at the table. Another resident stated to writer that resident attempted to stand in front of their w/c and tried to walk and fell onto the floor .Immediate Action Taken: Head to toe assessment .Placed back in wheelchair with two staff assist . On 2/29/24 at 11:12 AM, a review of R109's fall care plan interventions revealed the following, When resident attempts to stand or is observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan included interventions for one resident (R21) with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), resulting in the potential for staff to trigger episodes of aggression, re-traumatization and unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #21 (R21): On 02/27/24 at 9:51 AM, R21 was observed to be in bed. R21 awakened upon call of their name and sat up to the side of the bed. R21 appeared groggy. R21 answered queries and promptly returned to sleeping on their back in bed. R21 was not observed to be out of their room on 02/27/24. On 02/28/24 at 7:52 AM, R21 was in bed dressed asleep in bed and did not awaken to a call of their name. R21 was not observed to out of their room on 02/28/24. On 02/29/24 at 9:50 AM, R21 was observed to be in bed. R21 was not observed to be out of their room on 02/29/24. A review of the record for R21 revealed R21 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included PTSD, Major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly tabled and stored in one medication cup and three residents' rooms (R119, R191, and R603) resulting in the potential for diversion of the medication and or misuse. Findings include: On 02/28/24 at 8:10 AM, during a medication pass observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) S , three round , blue pills were observed in a medication cup in the top drawer of the medication cart. LPN S indicated they were not from them and had left them in the drawer. The pills were identified on www.drugs.com as alprazolam/xanax one milligram with the code 031 on the pill. Resident #119 (R119): On 2/27/24 at 9:27 AM, R119 was observed in bed, the over bed table was observed with a medication cup with three pills inside the cup. There were two round pills and one oval shaped pill. R119 was asked how long the medication had been sitting on the table. R119 stated This morning. On 2/27/24 at 9:30 AM, R119 was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00140264. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor food preferences for one resident (R160) of two residents reviewed for food preferences resulting in resident verbalized frustration. Findings include: Resident #160 (R160): On 02/27/24 at 9:45 AM, R160 (Resident 160) reported they do not get what was on the meal ticket. The meal ticket read: Standard (indication of the standard meal for all residents and for items desired on tray) Double portions 2 x 1 Hard boiled eggs with whole slices toast, 8 oz milk 1%. The meal ticket also indicated R160's dislikes of: pancakes/waffles, oatmeal. R160 did not received double portions and the following was noted on the tray: two pancakes, two sausage links, no syrup, one four oz apple juice, and no coffee. R160 was asked if they requested replacements, and R160 stated it is useless to ask, it takes an hour to answer call-lights during meal times. Resident further stated, I want a large coffee, hard-boiled egg, and toast uncut in order to make a sandwich, and they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/17/2025 |
| AARON, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| BAUMOL, YEHOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| GRAF, MARCELLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| SINGERMAN, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2025 |
| TODOS, CRISTINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2025 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| KROLL, GABRIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| NAGEL, STEVEN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| OMNIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 235298. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.