The Villa at the Bay
1500 Spring Street, Petoskey, MI 49770 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (231) 347-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $241,488 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-22)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.2% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.3% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.9% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.4% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.2% | 24.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.7% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 1.84 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.64 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.1%CMS range 35.5–57.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.3–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.3–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 76.5 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Intake: MI00150656This citation has two separate deficiencies. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide all necessary care and services for one resident (R128) of one resident reviewed for quality of life, resulting in R128 not maintaining his highest practicable well-being, being hospitalized three times and endangering his life. Findings include: Review of R128's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 3/4/25 with diagnoses including multiple right rib fractures and alcohol dependence with withdrawal. R128 was his own responsible party for medical and financial decisions. Review of R128's Discharge Summary from [Hospital Name] dated 3/4/25 read, in part, .Patient is a pleasant 78 y.o. (year old) male who tripped over a tv cord the morning of admission [DATE]) and had right sided chest wall pain. He was diagnosed with multiple right sided rib fractures, however refused hospital admission .He then went home and slipped and fell on the ice of his driveway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to readily identify, promote healing, and prevent the development of pressure injuries for two Residents (#26 & R42) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This deficient practice resulted in R26 developing a stage 3 pressure ulcer that worsened into a stage 4 pressure ulcer, and R42 developing infection and the deterioration of pressure wounds. Findings include:Resident #42 (R42)The medical record for R42 revealed an admission date to the facility on 5/25/23 with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia. R42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. On 5/20/25 at 12:04 PM, an observation was made of R42 in their room and lying in bed with a pillow under their left side and both heels touching the bed. R42 was asked when the last time staff had turned and repositioned them and replied, Since last night. R42 was asked if they had a pressure ulcer and replied, Yeah,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake numbers; MI00150212, MI00150215, and MI00150297. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1. New admission orders were double checked, 2. Appropriate assessments and wound care were provided, and 3. Timely notification of a change in condition were completed per professional standards for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for new admissions, resulting in R3 being transferred to the emergency department with post-surgical infection, respiratory distress, low blood pressure, sepsis, and subsequent death. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of complaint intake number MI00150212 to the State Agency (SA), dated 2/11/25 revealed, R3 was transfer to a local hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) in critical condition after a four-day admission from the facility due to his colostomy not being cared for resulting in stool contaminating surgical incision and drains. R3 now had positive blood cultures for VRE (vancomycin-resistant enterococcus) and was in septic shock. Supporting evidence of neglect by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain interventions to prevent the development and progression of pressure ulcers for two Residents (R9, R18) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in the development of one unstageable pressure ulcer and the potential for development of new/additional pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident #18 (R18) Review of R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 5/10/24 with diagnosis including right tibia fracture, right fibula fracture and nutritional deficiency. Review of R18's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS, section M, revealed R18 was marked at risk of developing pressure ulcers and had three unstageable-suspected deep tissue pressure ulcers. Review of R18's Skin and Wound Evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #2991669.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow menus prepared in advance for six Residents (#41, 47, 48, 49, 50 & 51) of six residents prescribed a pureed diet.Findings include:On 4/22/2026, the State Agency (SA) received a complaint which read in part, Complainant states that (Resident #41 [R41]) is on a puree diet and the staff have given him mashed potatoes for two meals per day for a year. Complainant states that (R41) has asked for a different meal option, but they haven't given him anything else to eat. Complainant states that (R41) chooses not to eat the mashed potatoes because they make him sick to his stomach because he has had them for too long.On 4/28/26 at 12:44 PM, R41 was in the north dining room waiting for lunch. R41 stated the food was getting better but he still got a lot of mashed potatoes.During a tour of the south dining room on 4/28/26 at 12:50 PM, R47 and R48 were observed to be eating a pureed diet. R47 was being assisted with her meal and did not voice any comments. R48 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #2991669.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely pharmaceutical services, for one Resident (#40) of three sampled residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include:Resident #40 (R40)On 4/22/2026, the State Agency (SA) received a complaint which read in part, Complainant states that she is prescribed Zubsolv. Complainant states that the medication is for opioid dependence . Complainant states that she runs out of the medication often and the staff have to go to a local pharmacy to locate the medication. Complainant states that she starts to have withdrawals when she is not on it, which includes sweating, nausea, anxiety, and diarrhea.The medical record for R40 indicated an admission date of 9/25/25 with diagnoses of pain in right ankle and joints of right foot, major depressive disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Physician orders on 10/27/25 included Zubsolv Sublingual Tablet 5.7-1.4 MG (milligrams). Give 1 tablet sublingually three times a day for pain dissolve under tongue.The medical record also included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to intake #2644019Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the involuntary seclusion of one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion. This deficient practice resulted in feelings of frustration and the potential for feelings of isolation, depression, psychological and emotional distress, and impaired mental health. Findings include: Intake complaint #2644019 was received by the state agency on 10/15/25. The complainant alleged Resident #1 (R1) was living in a secured unit in the facility where residents with dementia reside despite R1 not having a dementia diagnosis. The intake alleged, in part: . [R1] is in the dementia unit even though she doesn't have dementia.staff won't let her leave the unit. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) disclosed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a primary diagnosis of lymphedema. A dementia diagnosis was not found in the EMR. R1 was assigned to a room on the facility's south…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0628 — widespreadProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to the applicable components of the process for transferring or discharging residents including the notice of bed-hold policy and the written notice of transfer or discharge to both the resident, resident's representative, and the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman, with the reason for a transfer for five Residents (#1, #42, #50, #54, and #75) of five residents reviewed for transfers out of the facility. Findings include:Resident #50 (R50)During an interview on 05/20/25 at approximately 12:20 AM, R50 stated she had been transferred out to the hospital a while ago. The medical record for R50 revealed three transfers dated 12/16/24, 12/23/24, and 1/4/25. The medical record did not indicate a written notification of transfer, or a bed hold policy was given to R50 or a responsible party for any of the transfers.Resident #54 (R54)During an interview on 05/20/25 at approximately 11:50 AM, R54 indicated he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in accordance with the posted menu.Findings include: A confidential resident council meeting was conducted on 5/21/25 at 11:00 AM. When discussing meal choices at the facility, 8 of 14 confidential participants stated the facility frequently did not follow the posted meal plans. Confidential Resident (CR) #9 stated: They [facility] never give us a decent menu and never follow the menu they give us . It's an everyday occurrence. When asked if the inconsistencies happen at a particular meal, CR-9 replied, It's a surprise. On 5/20/25 at 12:25 PM, Resident #7 (R7) and Resident #16 (R16) stated they were not satisfied with the meals served at the facility. R7 stated the kitchen did not serve what was on the menu. On 5/21/25 at 8:29 AM, the meal assembly tray line was observed in the kitchen. Dietary Manager (DM) N stated the menu cycle being served was not correct as another manager had been in charge. The menu was titled Week 2 and was dated 5/11/25 through 5/17/25. The menu items were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide meals in a timely manner and/or consistently provide a nourishing snack to all 82 residents. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for residents to not have a hot meal or to have more than 16 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, decreased oral intake, and the potential for weight loss. Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 12:46 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #27 (R27) who was sitting in the dining room waiting for the lunch meal service to be delivered. R27 expressed frustration with having to wait such a long time for their meal. It's late and it's always been late. It was bad on the weekend this time too. It's constantly being served to us late, yesterday it was 1:45 p.m. before we got out meal, and it wasn't very good either. Around 1:00 p.m. R27 was observed going back to her room and stated she refuses to eat a meal that is this late. R27 was noted to not eat a lunch on 5/20/25. On 5/21/25 at 9:17 a.m., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by: - storage of expired foods, - food preparation equipment not cleaned properly after use, - utensils and pans not properly cleaned and stored, - sanitizing solution not properly prepared, and - unit nourishment room had storage of outdated beverages and resident foods. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 82 residents. Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 9:49 AM, the kitchen was toured with Dietary Manager (DM) N. The following observations were made: - Vanilla yogurt was in the walk-in refrigerator dated 4/16/25 - 4/21/25. DM N stated the activity department dated this container and the first date would be the date the yogurt was opened, and the second date would be the date it should be used by. DM N said he would dispose of the yogurt as it was about a month past the use by date. - A gallon jar of picante sauce was in the reach-in refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0906 — widespreadProvide enough power supply for lighting all entrances and exits; equipment for fire detection and alarm systems, and extinguishers.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an operable emergency electrical power system to ensure electrical power to life support systems in the event of a power outage, effecting all 82 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's incident report, read, in part, An ice storm hit the region Saturday evening 3/28 .[Facility Name] lost power temporarily the evening of 3/28 and went to generator power. Power restored within a few hours but eventually went back down the morning of 3/29 and the building returned to generator use. The generator stopped working around 7 p.m. on 3/30/, and the building lost power completely .The MAR/TAR (Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record) was attempted to be printed out utilizing the backup computer, but the battery was not able to run both the laptop and printer at the same time . The generator was repaired and power restored via generator at 1 p.m. on 4/1/25 .grid power was finally restored at 5:40 a.m. on 4/2/25 . One resident who required 10L (10 liters) of oxygen was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize their emergency plan to allow residents to directly communicate and alert staff members of their needs during a power outage and generator failure affecting all residents residing at the facility. This deficient practice resulted in resident helplessness and potential decreased emergent response times. Findings include:During an interview on 5/22/25 at 12:56 PM, Resident #7 (R7) stated, Oh yes, we remember the ice storm. They (the facility) had just so many flashlights and we were left in the dark. They did not have enough flashlights. It was coal black. The electricity went out and then the generator went out. There were no bells or whistles to call for the staff. We were on our own. It was bad. During an interview on 5/22/25 at 1:01 PM, R5 stated during the ice storm there were no flashlights, no bells, no whistles. We were out of luck.During an interview on 5/22/25 at 1:04 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) E recalled the ice storm and said We thought that flashlights for all would be a good idea, but there was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information for four Residents (#17, #57, #62, #278) of four residents reviewed for advance directives (legal document that allows a person or their representative to identify medical care preferences if they should be unable to do so). Findings include: Resident #17 (R17) On 5/20/25 at 12:38 PM while conducting a review of R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), the responsible party was identified as a legal guardian. R17's (State)-POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) advance directive indicated full code/full treatment was to be administered in the event of a life threatening emergency. The form was signed by R17, instead of their legal guardian. Resident #57 (R57) On 5/20/25 at 1:51 PM, during a review or R57's EMR, the admission record indicated R57 had a designated legal guardian. A (State)-POST advance directive signature dated 3/24/25 was written as a V.O. (Verbal Order) by a Licensed Practical Nurse for R57's guardian's acknowledgment of the document. No other signatures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide scheduled showers for two sampled Residents (#18, #73) and three Confidential Residents (CR#6, #9, and #14) of 18 Residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include:During the resident council meeting conducted on 5/1/25 at 11:00 AM, three Residents who wished to remain confidential stated that they do not receive showers on a consistent basis and expressed subsequent feelings of frustration.Confidential Resident (CR)-14 reported getting less than one shower per week and sometimes going up to two weeks without a shower. CR-14 indicated each resident was scheduled to receive two showers per week. CR-6 stated they received, Maybe one shower per week. CR-9 explained, If they're [facility] short of help, they always come in and say we can't do showers today. Resident #18 (R18)During an interview on 5/20/25 at 11:38 AM, R18 was observed in their room lying in bed. R18's hair was uncombed and appeared greasy. R18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete assessments to ensure safe self-administration of medication for three Residents (R60, R61, and R230) of 18 residents reviewed for right to self-administer medications. Findings include: Resident #60 (R60) The medical record for R60 revealed an admission date to the facility on 6/11/24 with a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure. R60 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 9 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 5/21/25 at 9:10 AM, an observation was made of R60 asleep and resting in their bed. R60 had a medication cup on their bedside table with six oral pills and a clear plastic cup with a light brown substance which measured approximately 6 ounces. On 5/21/25 at 9:18 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) O after they entered R60's room. LPN O was asked how long the medications had been sitting on R60's bedside table and if R60 had a physician order to self-administer medications. LPN O replied, The medications have been there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their grievance procedure and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances regarding complaints of missing items for three Residents (#5, #11 and #22) of three residents reviewed for inaction of grievances. Findings include: Resident #5 (R5) The medical record for R5 included a face sheet indicating an original admission date of 9/16/2008. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. On 5/22/25 at 10:14 AM, R5 complained she had many things that were missing. R5 said, I am missing two black tops, and I told staff but (heard) nothing. I guess the tops just disappeared. I am also missing an orange top. R5 stated she has tried to follow up and has asked staff about the items, but she has been told we don't know. R5 stated, Sometimes it gets upsetting. During an interview on 5/22/25 at 10:15 AM, Registered Nurse Consultant (RN) L…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and update care plans to reflect resident status for one Resident (#54) of 18 Residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Resident #54 (R54) R54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, quadriplegia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a stroke, protein-calorie malnutrition and anemia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R54 had a feeding tube in place on admission and while a resident. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated a feeding tube was not in place. A physician order dated 4/21/25 read, Contact Digestive Health to notify them of removal of PEG tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube inserted directly into the stomach providing an alternative for individuals who cannot swallow or received adequate nutrition orally.) and if any other follow up is needed, Patient/guardian decline replacement at this time. A physician order for Regular diet, Pureed texture, Honey-Thick…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were provided to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for one Resident (#54) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: Resident #54 (R54) R54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, quadriplegia, cerebral palsy, and traumatic brain injury. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15, signifying R54 was cognitively intact. On 5/20/25 at 11:51 AM, R54 was observed in his bed with severely contracted hands. R54 was able to open his fists slightly and said no staff helped him work on his hands and it, Probably would be a good idea. The physician order dated 2/9/25 included, Splint to L (left) hand off while awake and on at night every day and evening shift for hand splints. R54 stated he did not always like to wear the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper infection control measures pertaining to indwelling catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder to accommodate emptying of the bladder) for one Resident (#8) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for infections and illness. Findings include: Resident #8 (R8) Review of R8's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 9/29/23 with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. R8's 4/5/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating no cognitive impairment. R8 was also marked on the MDS for the use of an indwelling catheter. On 5/21/25 at 2:07 p.m., R8 was observed being assisted by staff to go outside to the smoking shed which is across the facility parking lot. R8 was being pushed by an unidentified staff member in her wheelchair. R8's indwelling catheter urinary collection bag was observed underneath the wheelchair seat, not in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary storage, labeling, and cleaning of respiratory equipment for three Residents (#23, #42, and #61) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: Resident #23 (R23)Review of R23's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 4/8/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissues). Review of R23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Review of R23's EMR revealed the following physician's order, initiated 5/8/25:Continuous O2 [oxygen] via (NC/MASK) [nasal cannula] at 2 L/m [2 Liters per minute].On 5/20/25 at 10:52 AM, an unoccupied wheelchair was observed at the foot of R23's bed with undated oxygen tubing connected to a portable oxygen tank. The tubing was observed laying in the wheelchair seat with no protective covering. R23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly perform hand washing and hand hygiene during wound dressing changes. Findings include: Resident # 42 (R42) On 5/20/25 at 2:25 PM, an observation was made of R42 lying in their bed. R42 summoned Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) H to take a used fast food chain coffee cup R42 was using as a urinal from them prior to dressing change. The used fast food chain coffee cup had visible coffee stains on the outer edges of the cup. CNA H took the used fast food chain coffee cup from R42 and placed it on their bedside table. During wound care dressing changes for R42 on 5/20/25 at 2:25 PM, the following observations were made: - At 2:34 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D removed gloves and changed gloves without hand sanitization. - At 2:40 PM, LPN D removed gloves and washed their hands for only eight seconds, did not turn water on prior to dispensing soap, and turned water off with their bare hands. - At 2:45 PM, LPN D removed gloves and changed gloves without hand sanitization, then applied Dakin's solution to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake numbers: MI00150212 and MI00150297. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the residents emergency contact and attending physician of a change in condition for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for notifications. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of complaint intake number MI00150212 to the State Agency (SA), dated 2/11/25 revealed, R3 was transfer to a local hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) in critical condition after a four-day admission from the facility. Family was notified by hospital intensive care unit (ICU) doctor. Family/emergency contact was not notified by facility of the transfer to the local hospital. Review of complaint intake number MI00150297 to the SA, dated 2/13/25 revealed, on the early morning of 2/9/25, R3 was transferred to a local hospital by EMS. The facility never contacted family to let them know R3's condition was declining or that R3 was taken to the hospital. This resulted in R3 being all alone in the local hospital on 2/9/25. Review of R3's face sheet revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake numbers: MI00150212, MI00150215, and MI00150297. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide for resident's care needs, for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for staffing. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of complaint intake number MI00150212 to the State Agency (SA), dated 2/11/25 revealed, R3 was transferred to a local hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) in critical condition after a four-day admission from the facility due to his colostomy not being cared for and resulting in stool contaminating the surgical incision and drains. R3 now had positive blood cultures for VRE (vancomycin-resistant enterococcus) and was in septic shock. Review of complaint intake number MI00150215 to the SA, dated 2/11/25, revealed, on 2/5/25, R3 was discharged from the hospital in stable condition to the facility for rehabilitation. On 2/9/25, R3 was admitted to the local hospital in critical condition with low oxygen saturation and blood pressure. R3 had an abdominal binder over his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake numbers: MI00150212, MI00150215, and MI00150297. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competent staff to provide for resident's care needs, for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for staffing. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of complaint intake number MI00150212 to the State Agency (SA), dated 2/11/25 revealed, R3 was transferred to a local hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) in critical condition after a four-day admission from the facility due to his colostomy not being cared for and resulting in stool contaminating the surgical incision and drains. R3 now had positive blood cultures for VRE (vancomycin-resistant enterococcus) and was in septic shock. Review of complaint intake number MI00150215 to the SA, dated 2/11/25, revealed, on 2/5/25, R3 was discharged from the hospital in stable condition to the facility for rehabilitation. On 2/9/25, R3 was admitted to the local hospital in critical condition with low oxygen saturation and blood pressure. R3 had an abdominal binder over his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer physician ordered antibiotic medication for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of R3's hospital discharge paperwork, dated 2/3/25, read in part .Cefazolin 6 g (grams) per 24 hours continuous infusion (or 2 g IV [intravenous] q [every] 8 hours . Review of R3's progress note, dated 2/5/25 at 9:35 PM, read in part Resident admitted from (local hospital) . Unable to use any or all devices. Needs assistance with devices .Medication review: A medication reconciliation/review occurred. Findings and actions: Clarified with (local hospital). Review of R3's progress note, dated 2/5/25 at 10:26 PM, read in part Received report .Cefazolin last given at 5:00 PM . Review of R3's new admission phone report form, dated 2/5/25, read in part .Arrived by: EMS (emergency medical services) 1800 ish (approximately 6:00 PM) . Antibiotics: cefazolin - PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) Q (every) 8 hours last dose 17:00 (5:00 PM) . Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 77 residents. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at approximately 10:15 AM, three pans of leftover food were observed in the upright refrigerator in the kitchen and included (as labeled) a pan of Chicken pot pie, Chicken parmesan, cheese soup. An interview with Kitchen Manager (KM) A was conducted. KM A was requested to produce documentation for the proper cooling for the leftover food. KM A stated that they did not complete cooling logs for leftover food. Immediately following the interview with KM A, an interview was conducted with the Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) F who stated leftovers were not supposed to be saved, pursuant to company policy. On 7/16/24 at approximately 7:15 AM, a flat pan, on a wheeled cart was observed in the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) information to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid). This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate reporting of staffing levels with the potential to affect all 77 residents. Findings include: Review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report FY (fiscal year) Quarter 2 2024 (January 1- March 31) revealed the metric Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered with daily infractions from 1/1/24 to 3/31/24. An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 7/17/24 at 1:05 p.m. The NHA stated corporate is responsible for submitting the data to the CMS PBJ report. The NHA confirmed they used agency staffing to meet the needs of the residents. A review of the Facility assessment dated , undated, revealed, .Part 3: Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies: Staff type: Identify the type of staff .that are needed to provide support and care for residents. Potential data sources include staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment, potentially exposing all 77 residents to unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at approximately 12:30 PM, resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed to have exposed pipes running along the floor at the east wall juncture. The pipes included 1 white plastic; 1/2 copper wrapped in black foam insulation, ¾ electrical conduit and 1/4 copper. On 7/15/24 at approximately 1:30 PM, an interview was conducted with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) G, who identified the pipes as originating from the wall mounted air conditioning units located in the corridor outside each of the respective rooms. When asked why the piping had never been boxed in and sealed, MS G stated he did not know and agreed that they should be boxed in and sealed. On 7/16/24 between 2:00 PM and 3:30 PM, resident rooms on the South (300) and North (100) units were observed without functioning night lights. The south unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine and honor food preferences for five residents (R6, R5, R17, R20, R27) and additional residents in a confidential group meeting. This deficient practice resulted in resident complaints of their food choices being ignored, extended wait times for alternate food choices, decreased meal enjoyment, and the potential for weight loss and nutritional decline. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 11:31 AM, R17 was in his room and stated the food could be better. He said the only things he really could not eat were broccoli and cauliflower. He said somehow, he gets these vegetables all the time and he had a medical condition in which prevented him from eating them. On 7/16/24 at 1:06 PM, R17 was in the north dining room and was finally served lunch. The other two residents at his table had finished their meal. R17 said he lived at the end of the hall, so he had to wait for the third food cart and his tablemate's trays were on the first cart. R17 received mixed vegetables with broccoli and cauliflower included. His…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an injury due to smoking for one resident (R21) of two residents reviewed for smoking. This deficient practice resulted in R21 receiving two burns due to unsafe smoking habits. Findings include: Review of R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 2/26/19 with diagnoses including contracture of hand and muscle weakness. Review of R21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score revealed a score of 10, indicative of mild cognitive impairment. On 7/15/24 at approximately 12:01 p.m., R21 was observed sitting in the main dining room waiting for lunch. A small burn was observed on both the index finger and middle finger of R21's right hand which were noted yellow in color. Review of R21's Smoking Risk Evaluation, dated 6/10/24, revealed the following, Does Resident Smoke? Yes .Is Resident interested in smoking cessation? Yes .Smoking materials: Cigarettes .Risk Category: Check all that apply (score is 1 point for any checked box on questions 1-7) checked: Resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure monitoring of weight and following of physician orders in providing proper diets to prevent weight loss for two Residents (#66 and #67) of two residents reviewed for significant weight loss, resulting in potential for delayed treatment, continued weight loss and decline in function. Findings include: Resident #66 (R66) R66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, malnutrition, thyroid disorder, and depression. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for R66, dated 6/16/2024 revealed set up assistance was required for eating and had a baseline weight of 153 pounds (lbs.). Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R66 on 7/16/2024 at 9:32 a.m., revealed the following recorded weights: 6/10/2024 at 11:01 p.m.: 153.0 lbs. 6/25/2024 at 2:08 p.m.: 118.6 lbs. (*Note- Weight was struck through with message entered by RN K on 6/26/2024 at 6:56 a.m. Incorrect Documentation. No follow-up weight was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fluids in the prescribed texture/consistency for two residents (Resident #14 and #37) of two residents reviewed for therapeutic diet orders. This deficient practice resulted in the delivery of fluid of inappropriate consistency resulting in the potential for decreased fluid intake, aspiration (accidental inhalation of food/fluid into the lungs), and associated respiratory complications. Findings include: Resident #14 (R14): Review of R14's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/27/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. On 7/17/24 at 8:39 AM, R14 was observed laying in bed with a white foam cup dated 7/17/24 filled with water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to correctly identify, label and use personal protective equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) rooms per standards of practice for infection control measures according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) guidelines. This deficient practice resulted in the potential transmission of infectious agents to all 77 vulnerable residents in the facility. Findings include: Resident 18 (R18): Review of R18 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 5/10/24 with diagnosis of a pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the right heel and sacral region diagnosed on [DATE] and a pressure-induced deep tissue damage of unspecified site on 6/14/24. Review of the facility's Facility Matrix CMS Form-802 revealed R18 was marked as S (suspected deep tissue injury) in category 5 for Pressure Ulcer(s). On 7/15/24 at 2:18 p.m., during an observation and interview with R18, it was observed that there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake #MI00143565 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resolution of resident grievances for Four Residents (R4, R5, R6, and R7) of six residents reviewed for grievance resolution. Findings include: The Resident Council Meeting minutes for February 2024 documented residents' concerns including but not limited to: (a) slow call light response, (b) staff not checking on residents during the night for incontinence care/brief checks, (c) lack of staff in the dining room during meal times, (d) staff being loud at the nurses' station in the mornings, and (e) receiving fresh water only once per day. The Resident Council Meeting minutes documented these issues as ongoing concerns that had been discussed in previous Meetings. The documentation indicated the Resident Council members reported these issues were not better. The section of the February meeting minutes titled Concerns continued from last month documented staff were educated to communicate at an appropriate volume while on the units. The meeting minutes indicated Staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intakes #MI00143557, #MI00143565, #MI00143601 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient numbers of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to provide necessary care and services for four Residents (R4, R5, R6, and R7) of six residents reviewed for sufficient staffing. This deficient practice had the potential for unmet care needs and the provision of inadequate care for all 69 residents in the facility. Findings include: Confidential Resident #4 (R4) was interviewed on 5/8/24 at 8:00 a.m. R4 said there were not enough CNAs to help the residents in the facility, and residents had to wait a long time for call lights to be answered or their needs to be met. R4 was alert and oriented, scoring 15 of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) examination on 3/16/24, indicating R4 was cognitively intact. Confidential Resident #5 (R5) was interviewed on 5/28/24 at 8:08 a.m. R5 said she had limited physical mobility and required staff assistance with turning in bed, dressing, toileting, transferring, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes #MI00144121 and MI00144264 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan and implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks to prevent falls for one Resident (R1) of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission Fall Risk Assessment (FRA) evaluation was completed on 4/19/24 and identified R1 at high risk for falls. The FRA indicated R1 had a history of falls. Factors contributing to the fall-risk included weakness, poor mobility, confusion, and psychotropic medication use. Nurses' progress notes for R1 documented two unwitnessed falls, both occurring on 4/21/24. No other falls were documented in the nurses' progress notes. The incident reports for R1 were requested. Two incident reports were provided by the facility. One incident report documented one fall occurrence on 4/19/24. The second incident report documented one fall occurrence on 4/21/24. R1's care plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respectful and dignified treatment for one Resident (R3) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice resulted in feelings of being disrespected and staff being rude. Findings include: This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intake MI00141559. Review of the Complaint Intake revealed the following Complainant H allegation, in part: . I directly observed a staff person being verbally aggressive with a resident. The tone of the verbal exchange was severe enough that I felt the need to enter the hallway and began to enter the room where the verbal argument was going on. The resident, [R3], was observed in her bed with a staff person, later identified as [Registered Nurse (RN) B] standing in the room doorway yelling at [R3] . The staff person was heard yelling at the resident about how she 'has 20 other residents and that she doesn't just work for her' . the tone was aggressive enough that it drew me out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure potentially hazardous foods (tortellini) were stored at proper temperature while waiting to be served. 2. Failing to demonstrate the proper cooling of potentially hazardous foods which were destined to be served at a later date. 3. Failing to ensure staff washed their hands after touching their head and hair 4. Failing to ensure staff were wearing proper hair restraint devices when present in food service and clean dish washing areas. These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 76 residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. On 9/18/23 at approximately 11:57 AM, observations were made during the noon meal service. A stainless steel pan of tortellini was observed in the steam table, waiting to be served. The temperature of the tortellini was measured using a metal stem probe thermometer and found to be 122°F. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they were using the updated Michigan DNR Act verbiage, accurate advanced directive information and missing signatures was in place for five residents (#13, 30, 50, 56 and 65) of five residents reviewed for advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), from a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers. Findings include: Residents 30, 50, 56, 65 and 13 (R13, R30, R50, R56 and R65) Record review revealed that R30's electronic medical record order stated R30 was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), code status form that R30 signed was a full code dated 07/25/23. During an interview on 09/19/23 at 08:14 AM, Social Worker (SW) D stated that she had been employed at the facility for four weeks, still had a lot to learn, and although had the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise resident care plans in 6 of 18 reviewed for care plans (Resident #19, #22, #27, #32, #38, & #46), resulting in the potential for unmet needs and services. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27) R27 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room on 9/19/23 at 4:45 PM. R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/08/23 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 14 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). R27 had the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, anxiety, schizophrenia, and depression. Mental Health evaluation dated 2/21/23 indicated R27 reported improved sleep since an increase in Trazodone (antidepressant with side effect of drowsiness). Note to Attending Physician Prescriber dated 4/22/23 revealed R27 Trazodone had been discontinued. Mental Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a safe, sanitary and functional manner to protect residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: As evidenced by allowing an unbalanced ventilation system in the laundry area. This unbalanced ventilation system resulted in a large negative pressure within the room/area, which could potentially result in the back drafting of poisonous gases, emitted by the natural gas fired dryers, into the work space, and could result in the lack of laundry functions for all 76 residents and any staff working. Findings include: On 9/19/23 at approximately 9:40 AM, observations were conducted of the laundry area with laundry supervisor (LS) AA. When attempting to enter the the laundry area through the door from the corridor, it was observed that the door was extremely difficult to pull open. Once entered into the area, the door was quickly pulled closed due to a large negative (vacuum) pressure. An interview with LS AA at this time revealed the facility had modified the make up air conditioning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect and failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident quality of life and individuality for four residents (Resident council group) of five residents reviewed for dignity, from a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the potential for feelings of inferiority, depression, and loss of self-worth. Findings include: During a Resident Council meeting on 09/19/23 at 2:04 PM, five residents attended that meeting and would like to remain anonymous. Writer asked if residents were aware of the resident rights. Five of five residents stated no. Two of five residents stated the activity director had mentioned some but they did not know what that entailed. Writer asked resident council group if they felt their grievances were investigated, resolved and they were notified of the finding in a timely fashion. Four out of five stated no. Resident council group shared that they share their concerns verbally and in writing but never hear back. No communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly on grievances reported in resident council meetings and provide responses to grievances in five of five residents, as reported during a confidential resident council interview, in a total sample of 18 residents and a total census of 84 residents, resulting in unresolved resident concerns and decreased quality of life. Findings include: During a Resident Council meeting on 09/19/23 at 2:04 PM, five residents attended that meeting and would like to remain anonymous. Writer asked if residents were aware of the resident rights. Five of five residents stated no. Two of five residents stated the activity director had mentioned some but they did not know what that entailed. Writer asked resident council group if the felt their grievances were investigated, resolved and they were notified of the finding in a timely fashion. Four out of five stated no. Resident council group shared that they share their concerns verbally and in writing but never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains To Intake #MI00138037 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for four (Resident #18 and 65) of 4 reviewed, resulting in allegations of abuse that were not reported and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings include: Resident #65 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 08/04/23, Resident # 65 (R65) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included developmental disorder of scholastic skills, major depression, anxiety and bi-polar disorder. R65 scored 4 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of the complaint intake #MI00138037, alleged that in April of 2023, agency License Practical Nurse (LPN) F was frustrated with R65's behaviors and tied R65 to her wheelchair and that former agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A untied R65, another unidentified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains To Intake #MI00138037 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for two (Resident #18 and 65) of 4 reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for further abuse to occur and allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Resident #65 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 08/04/23, Resident # 65 (R65) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included developmental disorder of scholastic skills, major depression, anxiety and bi-polar disorder. R65 scored 4 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of the complaint intake #MI00138037, alleged that in April of 2023, agency License Practical Nurse (LPN) F was frustrated with R65's behaviors and tied R65 to her wheelchair and that former agency Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative of the facility policy for bed hold for one (Resident #50) of one reviewed for hospitalization resulting in the potential of residents and/or representatives to be uninformed of the bed hold policy. According to the clinical record Resident # 50 (R50), was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, shoulder replacement and major depression. R50 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) further record review reflected R50 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 7/25/23. On 09/19/23 at 09:52 AM, during a bed side interview with Resident # 50 , he stated he had been to hospital twice this year and was not given information about returning to the facility or what the process was to hold his bed. On 09/19/23 at 08:08 AM, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN)B she reported having had multiple roles over the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident #19) of 18 reviewed, resulting in an inaccurate MDS assessment and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident # 19 (R19) readmitted to facility 11/28/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and solitary pulmonary nodule. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/28/23 revealed that R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 8 (moderately impaired cognition). Section G of the same MDS revealed that R19 required one-person extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, and supervision with eating. Section O of the same MDS indicated that R19 had not utilized oxygen within the 14-day assessment period (7/15/23 - 7/28/23). In an observation and interview on 9/18/23 at 8:17 AM, R19 was observed sitting in wheelchair in South Dining Room consuming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertain To Intake #MI00139343 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective patient centered discharge planning process for one resident (#48) of one reviewed for discharge planning, resulting in frustration, anger and an against medical advice discharge. Findings include: According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident # 48 (R48) was admitted to the facility for short term rehabilitation and had a diagnosis of left femur fracture and diabetes. R48 scored 8 out of 15 (moderately impaired cognition) on the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) for Section Q of the MDS reflected R48 and her and Guardian or legally authorized representative participated in assessment, section Q0400 reflected active discharge planning already occurring for the resident to return to the community. Review of the care management note dated 7/21/23 reflected R48's discharge plan was to return home and that she had a part time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for two (Resident #12, #38) of four reviewed, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for a decline in emotional and physical health. Resident #12 Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #12 (R12) was readmitted to facility 5/16/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, morbid obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/7/23 revealed that R12 was understood by others and able to understand others with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). Section G of the same MDS revealed that R12 required two-person extensive assist with bed mobility, two-person dependent assist with transfer, one-person dependent assist with toilet use, and that bathing had not occurred during the entire 7-day assessment period. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent and accurately assess pressure ulcers for one resident (R32) of 3 residents reviewed resulting in delayed treatment of the wound. Findings include: Resident #32 (R32) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, and nutritional deficiency. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed since R32 did not participate in the BIMS assessment and since resident was rarely/never understood. Review of the latest Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk dated 08/16/2023 revealed a score of 12 which indicated R32 was at high risk for pressure ulcers. Review of Progress Note titled Pressure Ulcer/Injury on 09/13/2023 at 02:24 AM revealed, Resident has NEW skin issue(s) observed. 1. Left buttock - 3 open areas. No S/S of infection. Skin turgor with good elasticity. Skin color is normal for ethnic group. Skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive smoking equipment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking (Resident #27), resulting in a burn. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27) R27 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room on 9/19/23 at 4:45 PM. R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/08/23 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 14 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). R27 had the diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, anxiety, schizophrenia, and depression. Incident Report dated 11/23/23 at 3:45 AM revealed R27 had a blistered area following a burn on her third finger on her right hand. The same incident report indicated no staff were interviewed. R27's smoking care plan dated 6/09/23 revealed her goal was to not suffer injury from unsafe smoking practices. R27 was to be encouraged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a toileting program in one of one residents was reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence (Resident #27), resulting in continued incontinence, decreased quality of life, and risk of skin breakdown. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27) R27 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room on 9/19/23 at 4:45 PM. Mental Health note dated 2/21/23 indicated at time of the evaluation, R27 was wet from incontinence. The same note indicated if bowel continence was improved, R27 would be a candidate for a lesser restrictive setting. The same note revealed R27's family could no longer bring her to their home for visits due to incontinence. The same note suggested R27 wear a watch with a timer set for every two hours to help R27 remember to use the restroom. R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/08/23 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements and alternate foods per resident preferences in one of four reviewed for weight loss (Resident #46), resulting in a severe weight loss in one month and the potential for continued weight loss. Findings include: Resident #46 (R46) R46 was observed on 9/18/23 at 12:00 PM sitting on the side of bed in front of her over-the-bed table, her lunch tray was just delivered. There was no mighty shake observed on the tray. The meal consisted of potatoes and greens. Chicken was the main protein source served on this day. R46's meal did not include chicken or an alternate protein source to replace chicken. Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) V and U were interviewed on 9/18/23 at approximately 12:05 PM stated R46 did not receive chicken with her lunch because she would not eat meat, and the resident's daughter had informed them that she was a vegetarian. R46's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated she was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when three medication errors were observed from a total of twenty-nine opportunities for three residents (Resident #69, #14 and #61) of four reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34% and the potential for reduced efficacy of medications and increased risk of adverse reactions/side effects. Findings include: Resident #69 Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #69 (R69) was admitted to facility on 8/2/2023 with diagnoses including unspecified glaucoma and bipolar disorder. Review of R69's active orders included Diclofenac Sodium Ophthalmic Solution (a solution used to treat pain or swelling of the eye) 0.1% (percent) with instruction to instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for eye drop steroid. On 9/19/23 at 7:21 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) K was observed to prepare R69's oral medications and eye drops for administration,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timely follow up with dental care for two residents (Resident #18 and #27) of 3 residents reviewed resulting in potential for tooth issues and unmet dental needs. Finding Include: Resident #18 (R18) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R18 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, anemia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R18 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 09/18/23 at 08:13 AM, R18 was sitting on his bed, was alert and well groomed. R18 said that he has a loose tooth and it scares him. R18 showed surveyor the loose tooth and pushed it out with his tongue. R18 said he had a dental appointment with the county, and they checked him out and sent him back to the facility with paperwork. He stated that, this was a year ago and there was no follow-up from the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable food tray products effecting Resident #30 and all residents who consume room food trays, resulting in decreased food acceptance and nutritional decline in a current facility census of residents. Based on observation, interview, record review, 4 of 5 from the confidential group meeting, and 2 (15, 24) of 18 total sampled residents, the facility failed to provide palatable food products effecting 54 residents, resulting in decreased food acceptance and reduced caloric intake. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 (R30) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lung and liver cancer, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Sepsis. According to Resident #30 (R30)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R30 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R30 requires minimal assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' food preferences and serve warm food on the menu for one resident (R30) one reviewed, resulting in resident not receiving food of their choice and experiencing dissatisfaction during dining. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 (R30) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lung and liver cancer, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Sepsis. According to Resident #30 (R30)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R30 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R30 requires minimal assistance with activities of daily living and ambulation. During an interview and observation on 09/18/23 at 08:21 AM, R30 stated the food is so bad he can't eat it. R30 also stated the food is always cold and he cannot eat it. R30 stated he drinks protein supplements and that's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) use gloves during eye drop administration for one resident (#69) and 2) routinely change and store oxygen tubing off floor for one resident (#19) from a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination, spread of infection, and facility acquired infections. Findings include: Resident #69 Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #69 (R69) was admitted to facility on 8/2/2023 with diagnoses including unspecified glaucoma and bipolar disorder. Review of R69's active orders included Diclofenac Sodium Ophthalmic Solution (a solution used to treat pain or swelling of the eye) 0.1% (percent) with instruction to instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for eye drop steroid. On 9/19/23 at 7:21 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) K was observed to prepare R69's oral medications and eye drops for administration, enter R69's room, and place medication cup on over the bed table while continuing to hold eye drop container in hand. R69 was observed to be sitting at edge of bed on left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$241,488 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $110,448 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
- $131,040 — penalty dated 2025-02-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-19 for 29 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-21 for 18 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-15 for 26 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2023 |
| AARON, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| BAUMOL, YEHOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| GRAF, MARCELLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| MCLENNA, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/06/2025 |
| SINGERMAN, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2025 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| KROLL, GABRIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| NAGEL, STEVEN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235429. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.