Imperial, A Villa Center
26505 Powers Avenue, Dearborn Heights, MI 48125 · For profit - Individual · 265 certified beds · (313) 291-6200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,760 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-23)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.2% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.2% | 4.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.8% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.6% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 32.6% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.7% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.43 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.85 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.2%CMS range 31.9–52.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.9–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 87.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.5–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 265 beds and averages 224.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2648112. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify elopement risk and implement interventions to safeguard one (R901) of one resident, resulting in R901 exiting the front door of the facility on 9/8/25 and again on 10/11/25 without staff awareness of the resident's whereabouts. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 9/8/25 at 4:08 PM, as a result of failure to identify an elopement risk resident and implement interventions to prevent further elopement leading to a second time exiting the facility and the likelihood of other residents affected due to lack of assessment that could lead to serious harm, injury, impairment or death. Findings Include:The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/23/25 at 10:30 a.m.The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/8/25. A plan to remove the immediacy was requested. The IJ was removed on 10/11/25, based on the facility's implantations of the plan of removal as verified by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer one (R901) of one resident to a higher level of care after complaints of unresolved, severe abdominal pain resulting in hospitalization. Findings include: On 5/14/25 at 9:23 AM, an interview was completed with Family Member A who explained on 5/6/25, R901 contacted them at approximately 5:00pm stating they were experiencing abdominal pain and the nurse provided them with a laxative. Family Member A further explained at approximately 1:26am, R901 again contacted them via phone screaming out in pain stating their abdomen continued to hurt. Family Member A further explained, they and R901 were advised by facility nursing staff the resident only wanted pain medication and if they were to leave the facility, they would have to sign out against medical advice (AMA), or if they left via EMS (emergency medical services), the resident would risk losing their bed. Family Member A explained R901 remained in the facility for 12 hours in pain and was eventually transferred to the hospital after contacting 911 on their own.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs during meal service for one sampled resident (R171) of eight reviewed for resident choice. Findings include: On 4/21/26 at 10:29 AM, during the initial tour of the facility R171 was interviewed and reported some concerns regarding the unit assignment, clothes, and food. On 4/22/2026 at 1:20 PM, R171 was observed in a chair at their doorway, with the overbed table in front of them. On 4/22/2026 at 1:23 PM, R171's meal was delivered, R171 meal was observed to have two large, thick pieces of meat, carrots, pudding, a cup of juice, and a fork. R171 was observed to ask the staff for a knife to cut the meat. The staff reported to R171 they can't have a knife, but they can get R171 a spoon. The staff person returned with a spoon, R171 was observed to try and cut the meat with their spoon. R171 was observed to push the spoon into the meat multiple times to break off a piece of meat. The staff person was asked the reason…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold (a notice provided to the resident or residents representative at time of transfer which offers the resident permission to return and resume residence in the nursing facility) to one resident (R232) out of two reviewed for discharges. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed that R232 was admitted into the facility on 1/6/2026 with the following medical diagnoses, Shortness of Breath and Hypertension. A review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R232 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the medical revealed the following progress note dated 3/6/2026, Resident's son and daughter reported to writer that they wanted . (name of resident) sent to the hospital with the belief that [they] had a stroke. Resident vital signs are wnl (within normal limits). Writer reported family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain care equipment in working order to protect one (R81) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings include: On 04/21/2026 at 9:19 AM, R81 was interviewed at the bedside and reported they needed a new wheelchair because the current one was old. R81 reported the wheelchair brakes were broken, and they didn't feel like the chair was safe. R81 proceeded to check the wheelchair brakes, revealing the left brake was loose and not applying any pressure to the wheel or stopping the wheel from rolling. R81 reported they had mentioned this to staff in the past and were told that it would be repaired and it never was. Review of the facility record for R81 revealed they were most recently admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident required total assistance for transfers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding (liquid nutrition administered via a tube placed into the stomach) was administered at the ordered rate for one resident (R9) of two reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 04/22/2026 at 8:22 AM, R9 was in bed with the head of the bed up around thirty degrees. R9 did not respond to any query. R9 was connected to tube feeding which was actively infusing at 70 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) via an electronic pump. A review of a 3/25/26 physician order for R9's tube feeding documented, Glucerna 1.5 Cals at 75 ml/hour x 18 hours . Start at 4 PM at stop at 10 AM the next day . On 04/23/2026 at 9:03 AM, R9 was in bed with the tube feeding actively infusing at 70 ml/hr via an electronic pump. On 04/23/2026 at 9:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was queried about the tube feeding rate for R9. LPN B reviewed their report sheet from the night nurse which documented the tube feeding rate for R9 was 70 ml/hr. LPN B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) intravenous (IV) line dressing timely for one resident (R130) of two residents whose PICC line dressings were observed. Findings include: On 04/22/2026 at 9:32 AM, R130 was observed at the entry to their room with a PICC line in the right upper arm. The transparent dressing which covered the PICC line insertion site was dated 4/11. The dressing was rippled and pulled away from the skin in places. R130 sat on their bed and said they had a post-surgical foot wound and was receiving an antibiotic via the IV PICC line an infection. On 04/23/2026 at 10:17 AM, Unit Manager C reported a registered nurse (RN) will generally complete the PICC line dressing change and it should be done every seven days. A review of the facility records for R130 revealed R130 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Cellulitis (infection) of the Right Lower Limb and Sepsis (systemic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2971921.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reorder pain medication in a timely manner for two residents (R139 and R151) out of two reviewed for pain management. Findings include: R139 On 04/21/2026 at 9:36 AM, R139 was lying in bed in their room and reported they had not received their methadone (for chronic pain) in three days. R139 reported this was not the first time the facility had failed to administer their methadone timely. R139 reported they were irritable and in pain and felt they were going into withdrawal (sweating). R139 reported they felt the facility did not care. A review of the physician order dated 01/16/26 documented, Methadone HCL Oral Tablet 10 mg (miligram), Give eight tablet(s) one time a day for pain. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026 revealed the methadone was documented as not given for last three days (04/19, 04/20 and 04/21/26). The Electronic MAR (EMAR) progress notes indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to timely administer medications to three residents (R90, R209, R240) of three reviewed for staffing concerns. Findings include: R90On 04/21/26 at 12:02 PM, R90 was observed lying in bed and reported their morning medications had not been given. A review of the April 21, 2026, Medication Administration Record (MAR) confirmed R90 had medications to be administer at 9:00 AM and had not been documented as given. At 12:58 PM, a check of the MAR revealed the morning medication for R90 had not been documented. At 1:29 PM, the Unit Manager C was with the medication cart and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E at the doorway of R90's room. Unit Manger C walked away from the cart and LPN E came from inside the room back to the medication cart. The Medications that had not been documented as given timely were: Ferrous Sulfate (iron supplement), Polyethylene Glycol Powder (laxative), Multivitamin (supplement), Spironolactone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2627267.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall care plan interventions for three sampled residents (R901, R902, and R903) of three reviewed for fall interventions. Findings include:A review of the intake summary noted, . after assisting [R901] off the toilet and returning R901 to [their] wheelchair, staff did not properly secure [R901] or ensure [R901] was seated fully in the chair. As a result, [R901] fell to the floor. On 12/16/25 at 11:50AM, R901 was observed in their room in bed and was asked about the fall and explained they remember the fall but not the details regarding the fall. R901 was asked if they had any concerns with how the fall was handled and reported no concerns. A review of R901's progress note revealed, 9/25/2025 12:11 IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Note: writer spoke with resident regarding fall. resident stated that she does not know what happened but that she began sliding out of the chair. resident did state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake 2572680.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for one resident (R702) out of three reviewed for care plans. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed R702 was admitted into the facility on 7/22/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, End Stage Renal Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R702 was also dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers.A review of a care plan revealed the following interventions, Oxygen Settings: O2(Oxygen) via NC (Nasal Cannula) at 3 LPM (Liters Per Minute)/PRN (As Needed). Date initiated: 7/23/2025. 1500 ml (milliliter) fluid restriction-Dietary 780 ml, Nursing 720 ml (240ml AM, 240 ml PM,240 ml MN (Midnight)) d/t (due to) edema, diuretic usage and hospital dietary orders.Further review of the current physician's orders revealed there was not an order for fluid restrictions or oxygen for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake 2572680.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess one resident (R702) prior to dialysis treatment out of one reviewed for dialysis. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed that R702 was admitted into the facility on 7/22/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, End Stage Renal Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R702 was also dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers.A review of a dialysis communication form dated 7/23/2025 was completed and the only portions filled out were the patient's name, date and pre dialysis weight. The vital signs portion, code status, pain, any changes in condition, as well as the completed by (name and title) were noted to blank.On 7/29/2025 at 1:34 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated they expect residents to be assessed prior to going to dialysis, whether it be on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach for four residents (R71, R83, R86, and R115) of five reviewed for accomodation of resident needs. Findings include: Resident #86 (R86) On 2/24/25 at 8:10 AM, R86's call light was unable to be located in R86's room. R86 was interviewed about the location of their call light and was unsure of its location. On 2/25/25 at 12:41 PM, R86's call light was observed on the floor underneath the bed. Certified nursing assistant (CNA) F entered R86's room and was interviewed and asked where R86's call light was located. CNA F stated, It's right here and proceed to pick it up off of the floor and clipped it to R86's pillow. CNA F was further interviewed and asked where R86's call light should be located. CNA F indicated that [R86's] call light should be clipped to their pillow. A record review of R86's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R86 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00149953 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure room furnishings were maintained for ten of ten resident rooms (416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 423, 425, 430, 436, and 440) on Unit D and one (R47) of one resident reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: On 02/24/25 at 7:23 AM during the initial screening of residents the following was observed: The end cap for the hand rail at left side room of 418 was missing; In room [ROOM NUMBER], a piece of vertical trim approximately four feet long was missing off the left hand corner of the wall as the room is entered. The trim had been laid on the floor behind the door. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the baseboard heater cover was hanging down to the floor on right side behind bed one; In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cover was off the baseboard heater behind the head of both resident beds the entire length of the wall, the sheetrock at the left side of the window, had crumbled away. The window was open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149869. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity during care for one resident (R216) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Findings included: On 2/25/25 at 12:03 PM, R216 was observed lying in their bed awaiting staff to assist with getting dressed for the day. R216 stated ,I need to be changed, my brief and bed are wet due to my indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) is leaking. R216 appeared tearful and stated that ,I am sitting here wet and I am late for therapy. It's not supposed to be like this. It makes me feel ashamed because I cant help myself. On 2/25/25 the medical record for R216 was reviewed and revealed R216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction with right sided weakness, depression, anxiety and diabetes mellitus. A review of the most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] noted a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment is a 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess one resident (R65) out of one reviewed for self administration of medications. Findings include: On 2/25/2025 at 2:02 PM, R65 was observed sitting in bed with two medicine cups in front of them. R65 was observed putting one pill in their mouth and then another. R65 was asked what they had just taken, and they responded, A gas pill and a pain pill. R65 stated the pain pill they had taken was Norco (Narcotic) and that they don't take it often because it makes them sleepy. No staff were noted to be in the room or surrounding the area by the room. R65 stated the staff usually just leave their pills with them because they know that they are going to take them. A review of the medical record revealed that R65 admitted into the facility on 3/21/2023 with the following diagnoses, Cerebral Palsy and Anxiety Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R65 also required staff assistance with bed mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00149953 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment for one resident (R211 and R165) of 10 residents reviewed for home-like environment. Findings include: A review of the complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed the following, .The room that [R211] lives in is in poor condition. The heater is exposed and looks like it's falling apart. There is brown residue all over the ground under the bed . R211 On 2/24/25 at 7:30 AM, R211 was observed lying in bed, a tube feeding pole was observed as visibly soiled, with dried tube feed formula observed dried and caked to the floor. R211's bed was observed next to a heat vent that had a damaged base board exposing the coils. Attempts to interview R211 were unsuccessful, due to their cognition. A review of R211's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 9/20/24 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction and Gastronomy Status. Further review revealed they were severely cognitively impaired, and was total dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper setting for a specialty mattress (low air loss) was maintained for one resident (R34) of three reviewed who had a specialty mattress. Findings include: On 02/24/25 at 12:23 PM, 02/25/25 at 8:36 AM and 12:18 PM and on 02/26/25 at 7:55 AM, R34 was observed to be supine in bed and dressed in a hospital style gown. R34 had a power unit for the specialty mattress hooked to the foot of the bed. The weight setting on the power unit was set at 400 pounds. R34 did not appear to weigh 400 pounds. R34 did not respond to queries about positioning or comfort. R34 was not observed to reposition themselves in bed. On 02/26/25 at 11:05 AM, R34 was observed to be supine in bed. The mattress setting on the power unit was observed with Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I. The weight setting was observed to be at 400. LPN I acknowledged the weight setting was likely too high. LPN I consulted with the wound care staff and reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document interventions, and prevent the development of a pressure ulcer (damage to skin from prolonged pressure to skin), for one resident (R165), of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 2/24/25 at 7:36 AM, R165 was observed asleep in bed. A positioning wedge was noted on the resident's left side, feet elevated with pillows. A review of R165's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility 12/18/24 with diagnoses that included Anoxic Brain Damage, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Dysphagia. Further review revealed that the resident was significantly cognitively impaired, and was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Further review of R165's medical record revealed a Nursing Evaluation dated 12/19/24 documented the resident had a stage 2 pressure sore (Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) to their left buttock, left heel very dry and cracked, right heel very dry and cracked, and scar on their chest from prior surgery. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident inhalers were dated when open in two of six medication carts. Findings include: On 02/26/25 at 9:10 AM, the Unit C back cart was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J. A Breo Ellipta inhaler was not dated when opened on the inhaler and was without a resident identifier and an Incruse inhaler was not dated when opened and was without a resident identifier. LPN J acknowledged the inhalers did not have an open date. On 02/26/25 at 9:26 AM, the Unit C Front cart was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K. Two Trelegy inhalers were observed to not be dated when opened on the inhaler and were without a resident identifier and one Incruse inhaler did not have a resident identifier on the actual inhaler. LPN K reported an open date was required on the inhaler. A review of the policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility dated April 2018 revealed, .Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will carry the manufacturer's expiration date. Once opened, these will be good…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE-gown, mask, gloves, etc.) was used for one covid positive resident (R577) out of one reviewed for isolation precautions. Findings include: On 2/26/2025 at 9:47 AM, R577's door was noted to have PPE on the outside, as well as a droplet and contact precaution sign. Nurse Practitioner (NP) D was observed to be in the room talking to R577, no PPE was noted to be on. A review of the medical record revealed R577 admitted into the facility on 2/18/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Covid-19 and Muscle Weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13/15 indicating an intact cognition. R577 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 2/26/2024 at 9:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was asked if R577 was positive for COVID-19. LPN B stated to their knowledge R577 was positive for covid and still required precautions. LPN B stated NP D should have put on their PPE prior to entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00144627. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at the preferred temperature for one resident (R703) of two residents review for food palatability, resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings include: A review of resident council meeting minutes for the months of March through May 2024 revealed the following, 3/22/24: Residents .stated the food that comes to the floor is cold when they receive it. (Food) cart sits for awhile trays not passed in a timely manner. 4/19/24: Residents stated food from dietary carts, the trays are lukewarm, food not hot . On 5/30/24 at 12:10 PM, R703 was interviewed and asked about food palatability at the facility. R703 indicated the food was frequently cold and stated, I don't eat it. R703 expressed dissatisfaction with the temperature of the food served to them and stated, My kids bring me food. On 5/30/24 at 12:20 PM, an observation was made of multiple staff passing out food trays to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00142645 and MI00142751. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for wandering behavior was provided for one (R701) of two residents reviewed for supervision, resulting in non consensual resident to resident sexual contact. Findings include: On 2/14/24 at 9:30 AM an incident and accident report (I/A) involving R700 and R701 dated 2/8/24 at 4:30 PM documented the following, Alleged sexual activity between male and female. Resident's were immediately separated, male resident was moved to a separate unit and was placed on a 1:1 (supervision) for safety pending investigation. Both residents denied any wrong doing and feel safe . Review of R700's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R700 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and Dementia. R700's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that R700 had a severely impaired cognition. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 12/11/23 at 9:35 AM, during the initial resident review: room [ROOM NUMBER] had wallpaper peeling under the toilet tissue dispenser and the silver tint of the mirror was worn off at the bottom, in room [ROOM NUMBER] the silver tint of the mirror was worn at the bottom and the hand rail end cap was missing at the left side of room [ROOM NUMBER] and the right side of the activity office. On 12/11/23 at 10:48 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had five are of tan splash/drips on the entry door, the soap dispenser was off the wall in the bathroom and the liquid soap refill had been left on the sink counter. On 12/11/23 at 4:01 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] a golf ball size hole was observed toward to base of the bathroom door, a black sticky build up was on the floor at the foot of bed one, multiple scrapes on the wall opposite bed two and behind the head of bed two and the cove base was missing on the wall behind head of the beds. On 12/12/23 at 8:37 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] the cover to baseboard heater under the window was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide facial grooming for three residents (R1, R95, and R115) out of five reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Findings Include: R1 On 12/13/2023 at 8:57 AM, R1 was observed in the dining room. R1 was noted to have extensive chin hair to their lip and chin. A review of the medical record revealed that R1 admitted into the facility on 3/2/2015 with the following diagnoses, Dementia and Anxiety Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R1 also required extensive one person assist with bed mobility and transfers. R95 On 12/13/2023 at 9:06 AM, R95 was observed in the dining room. R95 was noted to have extensive chin hair. A review of the medical record revealed that R95 admitted into the facility on 5/26/2020 with the following diagnoses, Dementia and Muscle Weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for one resident (R105) of three residents monitored for call light placement, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and the need to ask their roommate to put on their call light when help was needed. Findings include: On 12/11/23 at 10:50 AM, R105 was observed to be in bed dressed in a hospital style gown. R105 was asked about their care and reported they did not like the food. R105 was asked about their call light and reported they did not have it and did not know where it was. The call cord and pressure pad were observed to hang over the lower bed frame at the head of the bed on the left side. The cord led back to the wall receptacle. The call light was visible on approach to the bed from the door. On 12/12/23 at 8:28 AM, R105 was observed to be in bed dressed in a hospital style gown. The head of the bed was up around 45 to 60 degrees and R105 leaned over toward the left side of the bed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights and preferences were being honored for one sampled resident (R85) of one resident reviewed for self-determination. Findings include: On 12/11/23 at 1:29 PM, R85 was observed lying in bed, and asked about their stay in the facility. R85 explained that they were hoping to discharge soon, but explained that they were frustrated with having to get back in bed after dialysis. R85 explained that they would prefer to sit up in a chair, and prop their legs up however, they were advised that the chair that they had been using for dialysis, needed to be used by another resident therefore, they were told they had to get back into bed. R85 explained that this also occurred last Friday. R85 appeared frustrated, and explained that as a result of not having a chair to sit in, they had to remain in bed until 6:00am the following morning when they went to dialysis again. A review of R85's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 6/7/23 with diagnoses that included Respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138942. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the careplan with an intervention following a fall for one resident (R427) out of five reviewed for falls. Findings Include: A review of Intake MI00138942 noted the following, .staff [R427] was taken to the shower room, and staff had left the room. [R427] fell out [their] wheelchair and hit [their] head. [R427] has two abrasions on [their] head and knees. [R427] was on the floor for 20 minutes before staff picked [them] up off the floor. A review of an Incident and Accident (IA) report revealed the following, Date: 8/7/2023 at 18:25 (6:25 PM). Incident Description: Nursing Description: Resident observed sitting on buttocks in front of w/c (Wheelchair) in shower room. Resident Description: Pt. (Patient) stated [they] slid out of [their] wheelchair. Further review of the care plan did not reveal an immediate intervention following the fall. A review of the medical record revealed that R427 admitted into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00139471. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner for one resident (R426) out of one reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: A review of Intake called inot the State Agency noted the following, Resident was transferred from [Hospital] to [Facility] on Friday night 9-9:30 PM .admitted to facility due to blood infection, and to have IV (Intravenous) antibiotic for ten-day timeframe .Saturday, 9/16 afternoon, resident had not received [their] morning medication. A review of the medical record revealed that R426 admitted into the facility on 9/15/2023 with the following diagnoses, Dysphagia and Sepsis. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R426 also required extensive two person assist with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician orders revealed the following orders: Ertapenem Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 1 GM (gram), Use 1 gram intravenously one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete care planned repositioning for three (R28, R30, R35) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention/care. Findings include: R28 Review of the facility record for R28 revealed an admission date of 02/08/19 with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Quadriplegia and Pressure Ulcer of the Right Buttocks, Unstageable. An additional diagnosis of Sacral/Sacrococcygeal Osteomyelitis is dated 11/28/23. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R28 was dependent for activities of daily living including bed mobility. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 11/15 indicated Moderate cognitive impairment. On 12/11/23 at 12:00 PM, R28 was observed laying on their back in bed. R28 reported that they were receiving wound care treatment and that they could not recall whether or not they had pressure ulcers at the time that they were admitted to the facility. Additional review of R28's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement hand splinting as care planned for three (R8, R30, R123) of six residents reviewed for splinting. Findings include: R30 Review of the facility record for R30 revealed an admission date of 11/09/22 with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease, Cerebral Infarction with Right Hemiplegia and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R30 was dependent for all activities of daily living. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 0/15 indicated Severe cognitive impairment. On 12/11/23 at 10:10 AM, R30 was observed laying in bed. R30 was not verbally responsive and did open their eyes and make eye contact. R30's right hand was observed to be in a tightly clenched fist position. No splinting was observed in the right hand and no splinting devices were observed in the room. On 12/11/23 at 1:30 PM, R30 was observed laying in bed. R30 was minimally responsive to questions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138942. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during a shower for one resident (R427) out of five reviewed for falls. Findings Include: A review of Intake called inot the State Agency noted the following, .staff [R427] was taken to the shower room, and staff had left the room. [R427] fell out [their] wheelchair and hit [their] head. [R427] has two abrasions on [their] head and knees. [R427] was on the floor for 20 minutes before staff picked [them] up off the floor. A review of an Incident and Accident (IA) report revealed the following, Date: 8/7/2023 at 18:25 (6:25 PM). Incident Description: Nursing Description: Resident observed sitting on buttocks in front of w/c (Wheelchair) in shower room. Resident Description: Pt. (Patient) stated [they] slid out of [their] wheelchair. A review of the medical record revealed that R427 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction and Bell's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a 14-day end date was applied to an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for one resident (R177) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings include: On 12/11/23 at 12:30 PM, R177 was observed sitting on the side of their bed eating lunch. They were asked how they were doing, and answered in slow one-word answers. A review of R177's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on 6/9/22 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Psychotic Disorder. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and was independent for Activities of Daily Living. On 12/12/23 at 12:13 PM, R177 was observed sitting on the side of their bed eating their lunch. Personal Caretaker P was asked about R177's behavior today, and explained that they seemed out of it yesterday but had come around today. A review of R177's physician orders revealed the following which was ordered on 11/24/23: Haldol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely and/or stored securely for three residents (R188 and R205) from a total sample of six residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 8:59 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K was observed during a medication pass for R188. During the preparation multiple white tablets were observed in an unlabeled plastic medication cup in the top drawer of the C unit back medication cart. LPN K indicated they had been left by a prior nurse and may have been Tylenol. The pills were discarded. On entry to the residents's room, two pills were observed in a medication cup on the bedside table of the resident. R188 was asked what the medications were and reported one was a muscle relaxant and they were not sure of the other one. LPN K reported these were not provided to R188 by them. A review of the ordered medications indicated the medications to be Sucralfate, a one gram caplet pinkish in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a nebulizer mask in a sanitary manner, for one resident (R188) of four reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 12/11/23 at 10:30 AM, R188 was observed in bed asleep and covered in their blanket. R188 did not wake for an interview. During that time a chair was observed with a nebulizer mask and machine laying directly on the seat of the chair. On 12/12/23 at 12:38 PM, R188 was observed asleep in bed and did not wake for the interview. The nebulizer mask and machine were observed to lay directly on the seat of the chair next to R188's bed. On 12/13/23 at 10:00 AM, R188 was observed asleep in bed and did not wake for the interview. The nebulizer mask and machine were observed to lay directly on the seat of the chair next to R188's bed. On 12/13/23 at 11:51 AM, R188 was observed asleep. The Unit Manager, LPN F was asked about the proper storage for R188's nebulizer and explained that it should be behind on the table in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00135691, MI00136564 and MI00134919. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure personal items were maintained and labeled and the inventory form updated with new item for two residents (R708 and R707) of four reviewed for missing items, resulting in lost items and items not returned from the laundry. Findings include: R708 On 08/28/23 at 12:49 PM, a complainant indicated R708 did not receive all their personal items back upon discharge from the facility. The complaint indicated that all that was initially returned were a baby doll and some papers. It was reported that at one time of discharge R708 had a closet full and over flowing with clothes. Still missing were items like a cream colored suede winter coat, a blanket with family and resident pictures with the resident's name on it, a wooden jewelry box which included, pearl earrings, bracelets and a crucifix on a chain which R708 worn most days and outfits of clothing. The complainant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00136727. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise wandering behaviors increasing the risk for provoked reaction for one sampled resident (R704) by the perpetrator (R705) wandering into the residents room space, from a total sample of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 8/28/23 at 9:00 AM, a progress noted was reviewed in R705's electronic medical record (EMR) which documented the following, 3/24/23 11:00 AM, Note Text: [R705] wandered into resident [R704's] room. Writer heard resident yelling from room. As I was getting up to go to resident's room, I heared a big boom. As I walk in to the door I observed [R704] on the floor on top of [R705] as they was laying on their back on the floor. [R704] was on their left side laying on left side with their hands around [R705's] neck. [R704] was observed squeezing [R705's] neck. Writer immediately grabbed [R704's] hands to removed them off of [R705's] neck. [R704] yelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138308, MI00135691 and MI00135564. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary resident rooms and living areas for the residents which resided on the 300 unit as well as, one sampled resident (R702) from a total sample of four residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Findings include: On 08/28/23 at 11:07 AM, R702 was observed to be out of their room in the hallway and seated in a wheelchair with a white towel under them. R702 propelled themselves independently. R702 was dressed and had on plain white tube socks. On 08/28/23 at 11:50 AM, a review of a complaint for R702 indicated concern for the care, supervision and condition of the residents at the facility. The complainant reported that they had visited in March and observed bed bugs on the resident while they were seated in their wheelchair out in the hallway. A review of the Pest Management records documented the presence of bed bugs in the room for R702.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,760 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $9,360 — penalty dated 2025-10-23
- $20,400 — penalty dated 2025-10-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2023 |
| AARON, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| BAUMOL, YEHOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| FARMER, PATRICE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/18/2020 |
| GRAF, MARCELLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| SINGERMAN, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/25/2025 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2025 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| KROLL, GABRIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| NAGEL, STEVEN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| OMNIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235514. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.