No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency, A Villa Center

12575 S Telegraph Rd, Taylor, MI 48180 · For profit - Individual · 244 certified beds · (734) 287-4710 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (734) 287-4710 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jul 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12701 Telegraph Rd · (734) 287-0700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12701 Telegraph Rd · (734) 250-8858 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.5 mi
 
Park
13333 Telegraph Rd · (313) 383-5518 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12501 Telegraph Rd · (734) 287-2650

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.0%4.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.3%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.6%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.6%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.0%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine27.7%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.2%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.201.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.371.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.8%CMS range 22.1–39.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.6–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified78.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.6–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.08
RN hoursweekends
40.8%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 244 beds and averages 200.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-16)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow one resident (R210) to discharge from the facility at her request until the Ombudsman intervened on 6/27/24 of six residents reviewed for resident rights, resulting in psychological distress, depression, and physical attempts at leaving the facility. Findings include: On 7/2/24 at 1:13 PM an interview with the Ombudsman was held by telephone. The Ombudsman said that on 6/27/24 following a telephone interview with R210 and R210's significant other the Ombudsman came to the facility. R210 had explained to the Ombudsman that attempts were made for 2 days to discharge AMA from the facility and the requests were refused. The Ombudsman obtained permission from R210 to advocate for discharge rights. The Ombudsman then met with the Director of Nursing (DON) who said they were not going to discharge resident R210 because they were awaiting a court guardianship hearing. The Ombudsman educated the DON concerning resident's rights. According to the EMR R210 was then discharged AMA on 6/27/24 at 4:29 PM after the intervening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During review of the facility's staffing schedule from 10/1/2025 through 1/14/2026 it was noted there was no RN working in the facility for the entire day of 12/28/25. On 1/15/2026 at 2:06 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the facility's staffing schedule and confirmed there was no RN on 12/28/25. The DON said, The RN scheduled to work that day called in sick. There is no documentation to indicate the facility was able to fill that staffing vacancy with another RN. The DON reported there was no facility policy specific to RN coverage because it was a regulation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure trash cans were clean and properly lined; 2. Ensure pans were properly cleaned and allowed to air dry before stacking; 3. Properly date-label food stored in the walk-in cooler; 4. Ensure staff food and personal items were not commingled with residents' food; 5 Ensure proper cooling of cooked, potentially hazardous (time-temperature for safety) food; and 6. Ensure food service equipment was maintained in a safe and sanitary operating condition. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all the residents who consumed food from the kitchen, resulting in the potential for foodborne illness. Findings include:On 1/13/26 at 8:50 AM, a kitchen tour was conducted with Dietary Director (DD) F. The following items were noted: Two trash cans, full of trash, were observed without liners. The inside of both trash cans were stained with moldy-looking black, slimy patches. The following was observed stored in the clean pot/pan area:One full-size pan and one full-size draining pan were stained with food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures for multiple residents in the facility, resulting in dissatisfaction with the meal experience. Findings include: On 1/14/26 at 8:50 AM, the last tray on a fourth-floor breakfast meal cart was obtained to be used as a test tray. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E was present during the testing of food temperatures on the breakfast tray. The following temperatures were obtained using a metal stem thermometer: Scrambled eggs: 95 ºF (Fahrenheit) Oatmeal 115 ºF 8 oz. carton of milk 52.8 ºF The temperatures of the following items were not obtained using a thermometer, but congruent observations were made: The raisin bread was room temperature to the touch. The bacon was cool to the touch. On 1/14/2026 at 8:57 AM, R4 was observed eating breakfast and commented that the temperature of the oatmeal was hot, but the temperature of the eggs was so, so. On 1/14/2026 at 9:11 AM, R185 was observed eating breakfast and commented that his eggs were cold. R185 requested that butter be spread on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one (R15) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the delay in incontinence care and potentially other unmet care needs.Findings include:Findings include:On 1/13/2026 at 11:48 a.m. while in the hall of the fifth floor, a voice can be heard saying hello, hello, hello. Upon entering the room, R15 was observed facing the wall. R15 stated, I need help. I'm all wet (while patting backside). R15 was asked to reach and turn on the call light. R15 attempted to reach for the call light and could not be due to it not being within reach. The call light was observed on the nightstand tucked behind a towel, a stuffed animal, and other personal items.On 1/13/2026 at 11:51 a.m. LPN H approached the room and asked R15 what was needed. R15 stated, I'm all wet and need to be changed. LPN H was asked can R15 use the call light. LPN H looked for the call light and said they should have put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, or document an effective discharge plan of care for one (R222) of five residents reviewed for discharge planning resulting in the delay of home care services and potential delay for follow-up appointments for R222.Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint from R222 that they were not provided with sufficient information at the time of discharge regarding home health care services or follow-up appointments. On 1/14/26 at 1:08 PM R222 said, [NAME] set up home care for me when I left. It took a week after I was home before I could get ahold of anyone. The paper they gave me didn't have any phone numbers on it. I had to call the Social Worker several times before anyone could give me the right number for home care. R222 reported they were living in their home, followed up with their physician, and was receiving home care at this time. According to R222's electronic health record (EHR) the resident admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of stay for two (R12, R222) of five residents reviewed for discharge planning.Findings include:Resident 12 (R12): On 1/13/2026 at 11:29 AM R12 was seated in a wheelchair in the hallway and reported they were being discharged today. The resident said, I'm going to stay with my daughter for a little while. R12 was able to self-propel in her wheelchair independently. A review of the R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the dominate side and a fractured left humerus from a fall at home.R12's Recapitulation of Stay (Discharge Summary) form dated 1/13/2026 at 5:53 PM was incomplete. The Summary of Stay sections 1a-8 were blank. This included information for continuing care and/or special instructions or precautions for continuing care. The Additional Information section was also blank. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter) for one (R5) of three residents reviewed for catheter care resulting in the potential for inappropriate and ineffective care of the resident's indwelling catheter.Findings include: On 1/13/26 at 12:53 PM, R5 was observed lying in bed with foley catheter tubing hanging off the bed draining a small amount of amber urine into a collection bag. The collection bag had a privacy cover and was attached to the bed frame, below the level of the resident's bladder. The resident said there were problems with the foley catheter leaking urine last night. R5 said, There was urine all in my diaper and the bed. The CNA (certified nursing assistant) had to change my brief and the whole bed. The nurse came in and changed the bag. It seems to be working fine now. Upon further observation the catheter was not connected to an anchoring device. The catheter was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer care as prescribed for one (R5) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care resulting in the potential for R5's pressure ulcer to worsen.Findings include:On 1/13/26 at 12:53 PM, R5 was observed lying in bed watching TV. During interview the resident said there were problems with the foley catheter leaking urine last night and the CNA (certified nursing assistant) did a complete brief and bed change. Further inquiry and observation revealed the resident was incontinent of stool. The resident said, Yes, my diaper needs to be changed again. It's soiled. I was waiting until after lunch to ask them to clean me up. At this time CNA L entered the room to remove the lunch trays and the resident requested care. During observation of incontinence care, R5's sacral area pressure ulcer was without a dressing covering it and directly open to a soiled brief. The pressure ulcer was clean, pink, moist, and without foul odor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate indwelling urinary catheter (foley) care for one (R5) of three residents reviewed for catheter care.Findings Include: On 1/13/26 at 12:53 PM, R5 was observed lying in bed with foley catheter tubing hanging off the bed draining a small amount of amber urine into a collection bag. The collection bag had a privacy cover and was attached to the bed frame, below the level of the resident's bladder. The resident said there were problems with the foley catheter leaking urine last night. R5 said, There was urine all in my diaper and the bed. The CNA (certified nursing assistant) had to change my brief and the whole bed. The nurse came in and changed the bag. It seems to be working fine now. Upon further observation the catheter was not attached to an anchoring device to secure the catheter tubing to the resident's thigh. The catheter was pulled taut from the resident's penis through the leg hole of the brief hanging down from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2711513.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure correspondence between the facility and the dialysis center was implemented for one (R73) of one resident reviewed for dialysis resulting in missed communication for continuity in care. Findings include:On 1/14/26 at 11:59 a.m. R73 was observed on the unit, in a wheelchair at the nurse's station. R73 was observed to be anxious and restless. R73 was shouting (at no one in particular). Staff attempted to redirect R73's behavior by attending to needs however R73 became more agitated and would not communicate what was needed. Staff were observed transporting R73 away from the nurse's station. While in the bedroom, R73 continued to display agitation but would not say what the cause was. On 1/16/26 at 8:10 a.m. R73 was observed by the facility's entrance door (preparing to go to dialysis), as very angry and anxious. The Director of Nursing said R73 was upset to put on shoes and go to dialysis. A complaint was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light for one (R15) of one resident reviewed for environment resulting in unmet safety needs.Findings include:On 1/16/26 at 11:58 a.m. upon entering R15's bedroom, an unidentified resident was observed standing at the bedside, standing behind the wheelchair. R15 was then observed attempting to scoot to the edge of the bed and get into the wheelchair. The resident was asked what was occurring and the other resident stated, She wants to get up. The wheelchair wheels were not locked as the other resident stood behind the chair. The other resident was asked to put on the call light so staff can assist. The call light was observed activated while in the room. After several minutes of no staff response to the room, LPN H was observed at the end of the hall and asked to come to the room. The call light indicator that was located above the door of the bedroom was not illuminated. LPN H came to the room and redirected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 1316302.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident's property for one (R702) of seven residents reviewed for abuse resulting in R702 missing 28 doses of hydrocodone (narcotic pain medication).Findings include:The State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 5/20/25 that identified the misappropriation of a resident's (R702) pain medication by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I. The medication was a schedule II drug; a substance that is classified as having a high potential for abuse and severe psychological or physical dependence.On 7/28/25 at 1:00 PM R702 was interviewed and said that they had received all their pain medications and had no complaints regarding medication administration.On 7/29/25 at approximately 9:30 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the FRI investigation report and confirmed that R702's pain medication had been taken by LPN I. The DON stated, On May 6th a nurse went to give the pain med to the resident and saw the cartridge for that medication was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2565437.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a potential incident of neglect for one (R707) of seven resident reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include:The State Agency (SA) received an anonymous complaint that a resident had eloped from the facility unbeknownst to facility staff on 7/15/25.On 7/28/25 at 11:30 AM the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked if any resident had eloped from the facility. The NHA said, Yes, we had a resident that was new to us. The first time he went out to the patio enclosure during an activity he climbed over the fence. We notified the family and the police. At that time the resident's son told us that the resident had eloped from the hospital two times in the past. The resident was found shopping at Kohl's without any injury and is currently with living with his son. The NHA provided an investigation report that confirmed the police, and family had been notified of the missing resident but there was no incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2574104. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a resident to resident altercation for one resident (R712) of seven residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in R712 being struck on the head by R711 and the potential for continued physical abuse to occur.Findings include:A review of the facility's investigation summary of a resident-to-resident incident between R711 and R712 documented in part the following: On 7/5/25, at approximately 6:30 PM, there was a verbal exchange between R712 and R711 resulting in R711 ambulating across the room and initiating physical contact with R712. Residents were immediately separated with licensed nurses performing skin, pain, and psychosocial assessments. No injuries noted. Witness statement from Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) O, dated 7/5/25, I (CNA O) was assisting (unnamed resident) and while walking past the dining room I witnessed (R711) standing over (R712) punching him. I immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00153114. Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transfer documentation was in place for one resident (R101) reviewed for transfer, resulting in the lack of information regarding resident's health status, safety, and transfer arrangement and destination upon transfer from the facility. Findings include: A review of the clinical record documented R101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R101's medical diagnoses included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, unspecified psychosis, and unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented moderate cognitive impairment, impairment on one side of the lower extremity, and the use of a wheelchair for mobility. Census documentation in the EHR (electronic health record) revealed a stop billing date of 5/15/25 which indicated R101 no longer resided in the facility. Beginning on 7/7/25 at 2:58 PM, the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00153114. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation in the EHR (electronic health record) for a psychiatric petition to the hospital for one resident (R101), resulting in missing clinical information regarding the resident's psychiatric status at the time of the transfer. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that a resident kicked open locked doors to the fifth and third floor and attacked staff and other residents. A review of the clinical record documented R101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R101's medical diagnoses included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, unspecified psychosis, and unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented moderate cognitive impairment. Census documentation in the EHR revealed a stop billing date of 5/15/25 which indicated R101 no longer resided in the facility. Beginning on 7/7/25 at 2:58 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement physician orders for one (R603) of four residents reviewed for falls, resulting in R603 not receiving a topical pain medication or having a urinalysis (laboratory test used to detect urinary tract infections) completed. Findings include: On 3/18/25 at 10:36 AM, R603 was observed in the dining room seated in a wheelchair with a purple discoloration surrounding the left eye and upper left cheek bone area. R603 was interviewed and could not recall how they obtained the black eye. R603 denied having any pain. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I was present and said the resident had a fall, about a week ago. According to R603's Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R603 had severely impaired cognition status with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain dignity while assisting during mealtime for one resident (R163) of three residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential for feelings of embarrassment and low self-esteem. Findings include: On 10/29/2024 during a lunch meal observation on the fifth-floor dining room, certified nurse aide K (CNA) was observed feeding R163. During the observation R163 was observed positioned in a Broda Chair (a chair like a geriatric chair but with more versatile features for comfort staff flexibility). Occasionally, R163 was observed with a forward jerking movement. CNA K was observed standing on the resident's left side and shifting to the right trying to prompt R163 to eat the food displayed in front of the resident, as CNA K stood over R163 portions of the resident's pureed food dropped onto the resident's clothing. On 10/30/24 at approximately 12:40 P.M. R163 was observed being fed by CNA K, while attempting to sit in a dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and respect the personal privacy by opening packages of one resident (R142) of two residents reviewed for privacy, resulting in a breach of personal privacy and the feeling of anger and disrespect. Findings include: On 10/31/2024 at 10:30 am, R142 discussed during Resident Council that their packages were being opened by staff. On 10/31/24 at 11:55 PM, R142 was observed in bed watching television. R142 was asked about concerns related to personal privacy and mail being opened. R142 said, Sometimes when a package is delivered to me, it's already opened .that's not right to open my mail .what if they take something .that makes me mad. 10/31/24 11:38 AM, Receptionist P was interviewed and queried about when the residents receive mail/packages. Receptionist P stated, All packages are inventoried prior to delivery to the residents. On 10/31/24 at 12:16 PM, Facility Concierge Q was interviewed and queried about the process of delivering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change soiled linens for one resident (R131) of 27 reviewed for homelike environment resulting in R131 sleeping on soiled and damp linens and dissatisfaction with living conditions. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 8:20 AM, R131 was observed lying on a soiled sheet that had a urine ring that was wet in the center and dried around edges and measured approximately two feet long and two feet wide. R131, reported that they (staff) should change the sheets after my shower. On 10/30/24 at 8:30 AM, R131's bed was observed to be soiled with a urine ring that was wet in the center and had dried edges. Soiled area measured approximately three feet long by two feet wide. R131 reported that staff had not changed the bed linens after shower yesterday and slept on the same linens last night. R131 further reported that sheets should be changed when they are dirty. Review of R131's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission into the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to record, track, and respond to resident concerns/grievances for one (R15) of one resident reviewed for grievances resulting in R15's grievance not being addressed. Findings include: On 10/31/24 at 11:00 AM, R15 reported a missing item concern at the resident council meeting. On 10/31/24 at 11:30 AM, R15 was interviewed and said I gave Concierge (C) some clothing items in a bag that I no longer wanted. I left the room and when I came back there were some pants and shirts missing from my closet. I told Concierge (C) that the clothing was missing from my closet. This was within the last two weeks. Record review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R15, with a reference date of 8/7/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated intact cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly position a resident for proper medication administration and failed to ensure that medication was administered according to physician orders for one (R5) out of twenty-seven residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for less than therapeutic effects of the prescribed medication and placing the resident at risk for choking. Findings include: On 10/30/2024 at 8:30 a.m. during a morning medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N was observed with five pills in a cup. R5 was observed lying flat in bed. LPN N did not assist the resident into a sitting position. LPN N proceeded to give R5 the medication cup with instructions to take the medication. R5 attempted to ingest the medication when the pills fell on and behind the bed leaving one pill in the cup. LPN N recovered three of the pills from the resident's bed and disposed of the three unidentified pills in a sharp container (a container to dispose unused medication). LPN N was observed pulling two of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL assistance for three (R107, R5, and R110) of 27 residents reviewed for ADL care resulting in unkempt hair, jagged nails, unshaven facial hair, and lack of showers/bedbaths. Findings include: R107 On 10/29/24 at 12:31 P.M. R107 was observed in his room with portions of his hair pulled back into a rubber band. The resident's facial beard had grown 2-3 inches with particles of food stuck in between the facial hair. In the front of the resident's clothing drops of food were attached to the resident's clothes. During the observation CNA J was observed informing residents and staff I will try and shave this resident today, I am not on that set today. CNA J indicated each nurse aide was assigned their designated residents to shower and on that day residents were given a shave, nails cleaned if possible. On 10/30/24 at 8:51 A.M. R107 was observed in the dining room, the resident's hair was knotted and matted around the edges of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow standards of practice for respiratory care for one resident (R162) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in the improper storage of a nebulizer mask and the potential for cross-contamination. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 10:59 AM R162's nebulizer mask was observed hanging on the dresser drawer next to the bed. R162 was asked if there was a storage bag for the nebulizer mask when not in use. R162 replied I don't know if there is a bag I hang it on the dresser when I'm done with the treatment. There was no storage bag observed. On 10/30/24 at 9:00 AM R162's nebulizer mask was observed hanging from the dresser drawer next to bed. On 10/30/24 at 1:30 PM R162's nebulizer mask was observed hanging from the dresser drawer next to bed. Record review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R162 was admitted into facility on 5/18/23 with a pertinent diagnosis of chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for two residents (R54) and (R147), resulting in dissatisfaction with the resident's home an a increased risk for harm. Findings include: R54 On 10/31/24 at 2:02 P.M. during an interview with R54, the resident complained that her bathroom did not get warm or hot water. The resident gestured and explained the faucets only ran cold water. The temperature in the hand sink registered 54 Degrees Fahrenheit. During an observation of the bathroom the hand sink faucets were checked. There was no hot or warm water. The cold-water faucet was loose, and the water continuously ran even when placed in the off position. Above the bathtub the ceiling walls were cracked, had broken plaster and peeling paint. Holes and pieces of plaster were suspended from the ceiling over the tub. Around the base of the bathtub a loose cove base was noted. On 11/1/24 at 10:30 A.M. in an observation of the resident's room Maintenance Director M indicated the entire unit was going to be remodeled and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure annual Dementia Management and Abuse training were performed for one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) G out of five CNAs reviewed for in-service training resulting in the potential for unmet resident care needs. Findings include: On 10/31/24 at 2:24 PM, review of five CNAs in-service training education content revealed the following: CNA G Date of hire (DOH)- 6/2/2009. Review of a facility provided transcript dated 6/2/23 through 6/2/24 for CNA G, failed to identify abuse and dementia management training. On 10/31/24 at 3:05PM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) E was interviewed and said there was no record of abuse and dementia training for CNA G and said the training was due on 6/2/24. When queried about the significance of CNA trainings, ADON E stated, It is important to have trainings for the CNAs to meet their requirements and to provide education for what they do daily to meet resident needs. On 11/01/24 at 10:01 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and agreed that CNAs are expected to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00146301 and MI00146393. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments and implementation of indwelling urinary catheter care for two residents, (R901 and R902) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in the potential for the development of urinary tract infections and complications from indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include: R901 On 8/27/24 at 10:50 AM, R901 was observed in their bed asleep. A urinary catheter drainage bag was observed clipped to the left side of the bed. The urine in the catheter tubing and drainage bag was clear and dark yellow in color. A review of R901's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the emergency room on 8/12/24, and re-admitted on [DATE]. R901's diagnoses included: Parkinson's Disease, urinary tract infection (UTI), obstructive reflux uropathy, urinary retention, intestinal hemorrhage, heart failure, and seizures.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00139649. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer documentation was in place for one resident (R607) out of one resident reviewed for hospital transfer, resulting in the lack of information regarding resident's health status, safety, and transfer arrangements upon transfer from the facility. Findings include: A review of the admission Record for Resident #607 (R607) documented an admission date of 2/18/23. R607 was discharged from the facility on 11/9/23. R607's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, opioid dependence, atrial fibrillation, and depressive disorder. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. An interview and record review were conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/4/24 at 11:19 AM. The DON said R607 went to the hospital for hip surgery and did not return. An eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) note of 11/9/23 at 1:05 PM documented R607 went out for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00141041. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate professional standards of practice by not consistently obtaining resident's blood pressure readings prior to the administration of anti-hypertensive medications as ordered for one resident (R608) out of three residents reviewed for physician's orders, resulting in the potential for hypotension. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that a resident was receiving medication without proper monitoring. A review of the admission Record for Resident #608 (R608) documented an admission date of 7/23/21. R608 was discharged from the facility on 10/31/23. R608's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. A review of physician's orders documented that R608 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00141603. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately complete discharge instructions and recapitulation of stay in a timely manner for one resident (R611) of three residents reviewed for a comprehensive discharge summary, resulting in the potential for lack of communication to care providers assuming the resident's care. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that the facility did not adequately help resident with a discharge from the facility. A review of the admission Record for Resident #611 (R611) revealed an admission date of 11/21/23. R611 was discharged home from the facility on 12/22/23. R611's diagnoses included hypertensive urgency and cervical disc disorder with myelopathy. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. During an interview and review of R611's clinical record with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/4/24 at 12:02 PM, a document titled, Recapitulation of Stay [Discharge Summary],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00141883 and MI00141437. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consistently conduct weekly skin observations for two residents (R606 and R610) and a Braden skin assessment for one resident (R610) of three residents reviewed for maintenance of skin integrity, resulting in the potential for skin care needs to go undetected. Findings include: R606 A review of R606's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed R606 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 12/20/23. According to R606's EMR, R606 had the following medical diagnoses: Cutaneous Abscess of the Buttock, Generalized Muscle Weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. A review of R606's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/25/23, revealed R606 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 9/15 (moderate cognitive impairment). According to the MDS, R606 required maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform proper sterile hygiene practices, hand hygiene, and glove usage for one resident (R624) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy care, resulting in the potential for tracheostomy infection and airway impairment. Findings include: On 4/4/24 at 9:35 AM an observation was made of LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) G providing tracheostomy care on R624. LPN G sanitized his hands when entering the room. LPN G put a PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) gown on. LPN G put on gloves and a face shield. Then LPN G closed R624's curtain for privacy. LPN G gathered tracheostomy supplies and placed them on the bedside table. LPN G opened the tracheostomy kit. LPN G took out the basin that was inside the kit. LPN G removed and discarded both gloves. LPN G then donned a sterile left-hand glove. The right-hand sterile glove fell on the bedside table prior to LPN G donning it. Then LPN G placed the sterile field on to the bedside table. LPN G opened the normal saline solution with his left hand and poured the solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of controlled drugs (drugs that are subject to high levels of regulation, such as narcotics) in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation resulting in the potential for medication missappropration and drug diversion. Findings include: On 9/12/23 at 11:15 AM an observation of the 2nd floor medication room and narcotic/controlled drug back-up box with nurse manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was conducted. LPN B said the 2nd floor medication room contained the facility's only narcotic 'back-up box' (emergency box of medications containing controlled drugs). The narcotic back-up box was observed to be in a locked cabinet inside the locked medication room. There was a red numbered plastic lock on the box. LPN B said that when a narcotic/controlled drug is retrieved from the back-up box the red plastic lock is broke off. Then the nurse completes a 'medication form' to indicate which medication was removed and places the form inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent 11 significant medication errors for one resident (R226) when the resident was simultaneously prescribed and administered Phenytoin suspension, (an anti-seizure medication) with enteral nutrition through a PEG tube (flexible tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to deliver medication and nutrition) resulting in the potential for decreased efficacy and less than therapeutic effect of the medication (Phenytoin). Findings include: On 9/12/23 at approximately 2:00 PM during medication administration Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F prepared to administer Phenytoin 4 ml (milliliters) 100 mg (milligrams) via PEG tube simultaneously with enteral nutrition (feeding bolus). LPN F was asked if Phenytoin should be administered with enteral nutrition. LPN F reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and said, That's the way it's ordered. LPN F administered the Phenytoin along with 1 can of Jevity 1.5 (enteral nutrition). Observation of the Phenytoin bottle did not include any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated and accurate Advanced Directive information was in place for one (R4) of five residents reviewed for Advanced Directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility or other healthcare providers. Findings Include: Review of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed, Resident #4 (R4) had a code status of Full Resuscitate in the banner. R4's Code Status Elective Form revealed Do No Resuscitate (DNR) signed on 7/17/23. Review of an admission Record revealed, R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included Heart Failure. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 7/10/23 revealed R4 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an annual update for a preadmission screening (PAS)/ Annual Resident Review (ARR) (3877) for a Level II evaluation was completed for one resident (R87) of seven residents reviewed for PASARR, resulting in the potential for the resident to not receive appropriate mental health treatment and services. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed, Resident #87's (R87) determination letter with a date 4/28/22 revealed, . If the above-named individual remains in the nursing facility, a Level II Evaluation is needed by April 27, 2023 . Review of an admission Record revealed, R87 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included bipolar disorder and adjustment disorder with anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 7/12/23 revealed R87 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration through a PEG tube (flexible tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach for nutrition/medication administration) for two of two residents (R137 and R226) when PEG tube placement was not verified prior to medication administration resulting in the potential for medications not being administered into the stomach and aspirated into the lungs. Findings include: R137: On 9/12/23 at 8:02 AM during medication administration observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was observed to flush R137's PEG tube with water and attempt to administer a medication when she was stopped and asked if she checked for appropriate PEG tube placement. LPN E said, No, I usually push air through the PEG tube with a syringe and listen for a 'swoosh' sound over the abdomen with my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00137524 and MI00135643 Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate nail care for two residents (R7 and R20) reviewed for nail care resulting in the potential of low self-esteem, skin irritation, and spread of infection. Findings include: R20 On 09/11/23 at 2:57 PM, R20 was observed that bilateral hands had long fingernails with brown debris under each nail. On 09/12/23 09:45 AM, R20 was observed that bilateral hands had long fingernails with brown debris under each nail. On 09/13/23 1:45 PM, R20 was observed that bilateral hands had long fingernails with brown debris under each nail. Record review revealed R20 was admitted into the facility on 6/26/23 with a diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R20 had intact cognition and required extensive assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Record review of ADL care plan documented the following: The resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice #2. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper anchoring/securing of an indwelling urinary catheter for one (R182) of five residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in the potential for skin trauma. Findings include: In an observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 10:05 a.m., R182 stated he had a supra pubic catheter that hasn't been changed in over a month and didn't have a leg strap or attachment device. R182 pulled catheter bag out from under pant leg and revealed there was no catheter anchor or leg strap. The tube is hanging directly out of my gut; I asked the nurse for a leg strap but never got one. Review of an admission record revealed, R182 admitted to the facility 8/2/23 with pertinent diagnosis acute prostatitis, urinary tract infection, and retention of urine. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 8/14/23 revealed R182 had intact cognition a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2023
AARON FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/24/2025
AB INVESTMENT TRUST U/A/D 01/03/23Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/24/2025
TODD A STERN 2015 IRRV INS TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/24/2025
AARON, JONATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/15/2025
BAUMOL, YEHOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/15/2025
GRAF, MARCELLAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/15/2025
KROLL, GABRIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/24/2025
NAGEL, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/24/2025
HOSKINS-JONES, TRENNESEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
SINGERMAN, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
OMNIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.2M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 4%Other / private 22%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,459per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$279per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next