St. Joseph's, A Villa Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 169 beds and averages 139.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely submit MDS (Minimum Data Set, which is a resident assessment tool) assessment for two residents (R24 and R53) of three reviewed for resident assessment. Findings include: During the recertification survey the resident assessment task was triggered for MDS assessment being overdue 120 days. R24R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Intervertebral Disc disorder with Radiculopathy, [NAME] region. R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare 5 day assessment dated [DATE] was marked Incomplete, Assessment was never added to a batch. The following assessments were submitted for R24:According to the tracking record A0410 was coded 3 which means the Unit is Medicare and/or Medicaid certified bed.No other assessments were submitted, all MDS assessments for R24 are missing. R53A review of R53's medical record revealed, R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease. A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply protective appliances for one resident (R79) out of one reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:A review of the physician's orders noted the following, Date:1/16/2026 .Out of bed daily in wheelchair to tolerance with padded boot on R (right) foot, as well as a leg rest pad to protect her RLE (right lower extremity) .Status: Active .On 3/25/2026 at 9:52 AM, R79 was observed up in their wheelchair. R79 reported they used to wear a boot on their right foot but had not worn them in quite some time. No padded boot was observed on the right foot, or leg rest pad to protect the RLE (right lower extremity). R79 reported they felt as though they still needed to wear the boot and leg rest pad. The medical record revealed R79 admitted into the facility on 1/12/2026 with the following medical diagnoses, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Polyneuropathy. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental (BIMS) status score of 12/15, indicating an impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was free from accident hazards for one (R58) out of four reviewed for accidents. Findings include:On 3/24/2026 at 10:40 AM, R58 was observed lying in bed in a low position. R58's right side of the bed was against the wall with the left side open to the room. Observed on the floor next to the bed was a floor mat that appeared to be torn in the middle and curled up towards the ends of the mat. A review of R58's medical record revealed, R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Dementia, severity, without behavioral disturbance, Psychotic disturbance, Mood disturbance. A review of R58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted R58 with moderately impaired cognition and required some assistance with activities of daily living by staff. A review of R58's progress note, revealed the following, 1/27/2026 13:45 (1:45 PM) Incident/Accident: Writer observed resident on the floor in front of her wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R154) was free from unnecessary medications out of six reviewed for medications. Findings include:A review of the medical record showed R154 was admitted into the facility on 3/13/26 with diagnoses of heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels). A review of the most recent MDS (minimum data set) of R154 showed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 15/15, indicating fully intact cognition.A review of the medication orders of R154 revealed the following active orders:1.Trelegy Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 200-62.5-25 MCG/ACT (microgram per actuation) (Fluticasone-Umeclidinium-Vilanterol) 1 puff inhale orally in the morning for SOB (shortness of breath)/Asthma. D/C (discontinue) Trelegy when Fluticasone/Salmetrol 100/50 mcg inhaler arrives.2. Advair Diskus Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 100-50 MCG/DOSE (Fluticasone-Salmeterol)1 inhalation inhale orally every 12 hours for Asthma.A review of the March 2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate information in the medical record for one resident (R57) out of two reviewed for medical records. Findings include:On 3/24/2026 at 10:00 AM, R57 was observed sitting up in their wheelchair. R57 stated they were doing much better since they completed therapy and was looking to discharge home soon.A review of the medical record revealed R57 admitted into the facility on 1/16/2026 with the following medical diagnoses, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 6/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R57 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the progress notes revealed the following provider note, Effective date: 3/18/2025 .PLAN: Obstructive Uropathy-(name of indwelling catheter) in place-Monitor closely for urinary retention-Patient will need outpatient follow up with urology .On 3/24/2026 at 12:57 PM, R57 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake numbers MI00151424 and MI00152073. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment, treatment and services to attain mental and psychosocial well-being for one resident (R502) of five residents reviewed for mental and psychosocial services. Findings include: R502 R502 was observed in bed in her room on 4/9/25 at 10:47 AM. R502 was crying with tears, stating they are not getting adequate mental health care and services that were appropriate for their health condition. R502 mentioned their diagnoses had crippled them and made them disabled. They also stated they used to walk, but now requires help. R502 expressed they are not getting any psychological services at the facility. R502's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was reviewed on 4/9/25 at 4:00 PM. It revealed R502 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, current Episode Manic Severe with Psychotic features, Mood Disorder due to known physiological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all142 residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 2/3/25 between 8:35 AM-8:50 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with [NAME] B, the following items were observed: The paper towel dispenser by the hand washing sink at the entrance to the kitchen was empty. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-301.12 Hand Drying Provision, Each handwashing sink or group of adjacent handwashing sinks shall be provided with: (A) Individual, disposable towels;. In the walk-in cooler, there was a pack of cheddar cheese with no date on it. [NAME] B discarded the cheddar cheese. The smaller cooler had a temperature of 49 degrees Fahrenheit. Three individual beverages were observed in the freezer with no labeling on the bottles. The [NAME] indicated that the beverages were most likely employee beverages that had been placed in the freezer. On 2/4/25 at 10:28 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) C was interviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for one sampled resident (R140) of three reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: On 2/03/25 at 11:56 AM, R140 was observed with thick chin hair and with matted hair on the back of their head. On 2/04/25 at 4:08 PM, R140 was observed with a thick layer of chin hair and matted hair. R140 was asked about the chin hair. R140 was observed to grab their chin hair and pulled it away from their chin, then stated, I got a beard. R140 was asked if they preferred their hair this way and stated, No. It's out of control. R140 was asked if they had refused to get it cut and reported no they had not refused. R140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Osteoarthritis. A review of R140's five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment noted, R140 with an intact cognition. R140's Nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed, R140 required assistance with ADLs. On 2/04/25 at 4:18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two residents (R24 and one confidential group resident) of seven residents reviewed for a homelike environment resulting in resident feelings of dissatisfaction with their living environment. Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 11:20 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R24 was interviewed regarding their satisfaction with care and services at the facility. R24 stated, There's not enough room. I don't feel comfortable in this room. R24 further indicated that their bed was too close to their roommate's bed. An observation of R24's room revealed that a total of four residents resided in the room and the distance between R24's bed and the resident's bed closest to them was less than one foot, with a privacy curtain hanging between the two beds. On 11/28/23 at 10:00 AM, a confidential group meeting was conducted with six confidential group members and the group was asked about their level of satisfaction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order in a timely manner for provided and implemented hand splints for one (R113) of three residents reviewed for hand splints. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R113 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Wasting/Atrophy and Seizure Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R113 required total assistance for all activities of daily living. On 11/27/23 at 12:30 PM, R113 was observed laying in bed. The resident was not able to functionally communicate and both upper extremities appeared to be contracted. A right wrist/hand splint was observed to be in place in a loose and incorrect position. Additional review of the facility record for R113 revealed no physician order, care plan item or resident care Task item related to upper extremity splints. Review of R113's therapy record revealed an Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI