Villa at Borgess Place
3057 Gull Road, Kalamazoo, MI 49048 · For profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (269) 552-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,130 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-13)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.2% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.1% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.3% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.9% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 24.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.2% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.2%CMS range 47.6–58.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.6–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 76.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.4–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 92.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
70 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2988571Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote the healing of an existing pressure ulcer and to prevent pressure ulcer development for one resident (#3) out of three residents reviewed resulting in a stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial-thickness skin injury) developing to an unstageable pressure ulcer(a full-thickness tissue loss where the depth is covered by eschar or slough tissue), the development of a new unstageable pressure ulcer, and the resident experience a pain level of 9 out of 10 (pain scale 1 - least pain and 10 being the most pain).Findings Included:Resident #3 (R3)Review of the medical record demonstrated that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, muscle disorder, difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, cognition communication deficit, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), atherosclerotic heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2799926.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that interventions for increased supervision and assistance were implemented for residents at high risk for falls for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for fall prevention, resulting in an unwitnessed fall with laceration to the head and subsequent hospitalization for SAH (subarachnoid hemorrhage) and SDH (subdural hematoma). Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: sepsis (life threatening condition cause by an infection), weakness, cognitive deficit (impaired mental processes), insomnia (unable to sleep) and repeated falls. Review of Resident #101's Social Services Note dated 1/16/26 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #101 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for the prevention of pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #47) of 18 residents reviewed for person centered care plans resulting in Resident #47 developing an open wound on his coccyx (tail bone area) and a pressure ulcer on his left heel.Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #47 was a male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: CVA (cerebral vascular accident/ stroke), hemiplegia of the left side (inability to move the left side of the body), peg-tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube- a tube inserted into the stomach to provide artificial nutrition) and aphasia (a disorder that affect show a person communicates).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #47, with a reference date of 8/1/2025 revealed Section GG - Functional Abilities - Admission coding included self-care.code the resident's usual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate care to prevent the development of pressure ulcers in 1 (Resident #47) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in Resident #47 developing pressure ulcers in the coccyx (the tailbone area of the body) and the left heel.Findings include:Resident #47Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #47 was a male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: CVA (cerebral vascular accident/ stroke), hemiplegia of the left side (inability to move the left side of the body), peg-tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube- a tube inserted into the stomach to provide artificial nutrition) and aphasia (a disorder that affect show a person communicates).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #47, with a reference date of 8/1/2025 revealed Section GG - Functional Abilities - Admission coding indicated Resident #47 was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00153113.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for 1 (Resident #105) of 3 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with major injury requiring hospitalization and surgical intervention for Resident #105 and potential for additional falls with injury. Findings include: Resident #105 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #105 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility and muscle weakness.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #105, with a reference date of 2/18/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #105 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #105's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 9/9/24 revealed that Resident #105 had recent falls, generalized weakness and mobility, was taking an anti-epileptic (medication used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2972335Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for ADL care.Findings Included:Resident #1 (R1)Review of the medical record demonstrated that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes, staphylococcal arthritis (serious, rapid-onset infection of a joint cause by staphylococcus aureus bacteria) left shoulder, metabolic encephalopathy (a broad term for brain dysfunction), staphylococcal arthritis right knee, pancytopenia (simultaneous reduction of red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets), abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), insomnia, vascular dementia with agitation, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus (a type of bacterium resistant to many antibiotics), peripheral vascular disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control procedures for one resident (#3) of three residents observed during clean dressing changes.Findings Included::Resident #3 (R3)Review of the medical record demonstrated that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, muscle disorder, difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, cognition communication deficit, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup in coronary arteries), hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux, irritable bowel syndrome, overactive bladder, constipation, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), pneumonia, urinary retention, osteoarthritis (degenerative wear of bone joints), mild cognitive impairment, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), and osteoporosis (bone weaking). Review of R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2795029.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for 1 resident (Resident #103) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge process, resulting in lack of a capable caregiver in place and the necessary durable medical equipment available prior to discharge to the community.Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: aftercare following joint replacement surgery, artificial left knee joint, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side (inability to move one side of the body due to brain damage from a blood clot).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #103, with a reference date of 2/11/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2799926.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan related to high risk for falls in 1 resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in an unwitnessed fall with major injury.Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: sepsis (life threatening condition cause by an infection), weakness, cognitive deficit (impaired mental processes), insomnia (unable to sleep) and repeated falls. Review of Resident #101's Social Services Note dated 1/16/26 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #101 had severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #101's Fall Assessment dated 1/15/26 at 2:02 PM revealed, High Fall Risk. Score: 24.3 or more falls in past 3 months, intermittent confusion, Ambulation/elimination status:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2791318.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with professional standards and per physician orders for 1 resident (Resident #104) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care, when nursing staff failed to administer medications per physician order and resident request.Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic bronchitis (a long-term type of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that makes breathing difficult) characterized by a persistent, mucus-producing cough). Review of Resident #104's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 2/23/26 revealed, a score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #104 was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #104's Care Plan revealed no documentation of chronic bronchitis, COPD, and/or cough. No documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2668784Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident dignity in 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 5 sampled residents, resulting in feelings of humiliation, embarrassment, and shame. Findings include:Resident #1Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #1 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur (fractured left hip) malnutrition, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease that restricts breathing).Review of a Social Service Evaluation with a date of 10/24/25 completed at admission for Resident #1 indicated Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact.In a telephone interview on 12/04/25 at 3:40 PM Family Member (FM) U reported during a visit with Resident #1, she had an episode of incontinence (a lack of control over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 sampled residents resulting in the potential for unmet care needs.Findings include:Resident #3Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #3 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnosis which included: minimally displaced zone 1 fracture of the sacrum (a break in the wedge-shaped bone (sacrum) at the base of the spine where the bone fragments have not significantly shifted or separated).Review of a Social Service Evaluation with a date of 12/5/25 completed at admission for Resident #3 indicated Resident #3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact.On 12/8/25 at 11:05 AM Resident #3's door frame to her room was observed to have signage present indicating that Resident #3 was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). In an interview on 12/8/25 at 1:23 PM Resident #3 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2668784Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of nursing practice were maintained by following physician orders in 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for professional nursing standards and physician orders resulting in laboratory diagnostic testing not being completed as ordered. Findings include:Resident #1Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #1 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur (fractured left hip) malnutrition, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease that restricts breathing).Review of a Social Service Evaluation with a date of 10/24/25 completed at admission for Resident #1 indicated Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact.In a telephone interview on 12/4/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper management of an indwelling urinary catheter in 1 (Resident #3) of 1 resident reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter resulting in the potential for unmet care needs.Findings include:Resident #3Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #3 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnosis which included: minimally displaced zone 1 fracture of the sacrum (a break in the wedge-shaped bone (sacrum) at the base of the spine where the bone fragments have not significantly shifted or separated).Review of a Social Service Evaluation with a date of 12/5/25 completed at admission for Resident #3 indicated Resident #3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact.On 12/8/25 at 11:05 AM, Resident #3 was observed to have a urine collection bag on the side of her wheelchair.Review of Physician Orders for Resident #3 on 12/8/25 revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper management of a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter - intravenous tube used for prolonged vascular access) in 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for a PICC resulting in the potential for unmet care needs.Findings include:Resident #5Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #3 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnosis which included: intraspinal abscess and granuloma (a localized collection of pus around the spinal canal, typically resulting from infections, and a mass of tissue that forms as a response from inflammation). On 12/10/25 at 1:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M was observed in Resident #5's room disconnecting IV (intravenous) tubing from a PICC line in Resident #5's left arm.Review of Order Summary for Resident #5 printed on 12/10/25 at 13:48 (1:48 PM) revealed no noted documented order for a PICC line or a noted order for monitoring the site of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during cares while in enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for PPE use during cares while in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), resulting in the potential for the introduction of and/or the spread of infection.Findings include:Resident #5Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #3 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnosis which included: intraspinal abscess and granuloma (a localized collection of pus around the spinal canal, typically resulting from infections, and a mass of tissue that forms as a response from inflammation). On 12/10/25 at 12:59 PM, observed signage outside of Resident #5's room indicated enhanced barrier precautions were in place during cares for Resident #5. The sign indicated that staff were to wear a gown and gloves when providing high contact care for Resident #5.On 12/10/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings include: On 8/11/25 at 7:40 AM, an interview with Manager in Training (MIT) HHH found that the kitchen date marks items made in house for 7 Days and would datemark sliced meats for 10 days. On 8/11/25 at 7:46 AM, observation of the walk-in cooler found a large chunk ham open with some pieces sliced from it. The ham was dated 8/6 to 9/15. On 8/11/25 at 8:02 AM, observation of the four door Traulsen cooler found the following items: a container of hardboiled eggs with no date, a container with sliced chunk ham dated 8/5 to 9/5, and a container of hot dogs dated 8/8 to 8/20. On 8/11/25 at 3:24 PM, observation of the Spiritual Garden kitchen found the following items: Sliced ham with no date, hot dogs in a plastic bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote dignity and respect for 8 of 8 residents who attended a confidential group meeting, resulting in feelings of frustration, decreased self-worth and embarrassment.Findings include: During an observation on 8/12/25 at 10:00am, an unknown Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on the heirloom unit, sat outside a resident's room and conducted a personal conversation using the speakerphone feature on her personal cellphone. The conversation could be heard from inside the occupied resident room.In a confidential group meeting on 8/12/25 at 1:00pm, 8 of 8 residents in attendance reported staff members used their personal cellphones, sometimes with earbuds, while providing care to them. One resident reported a staff member joined him in the bathroom, to assist with personal hygiene and completed the task while talking to someone via the use of earbuds. When queried, the resident reported he felt unimportant and embarrassed by the situation. A female resident reported she was left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2586142Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. provide an environment that was free from accident hazards for 2 residents (Resident #73 and Resident #40) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in an elopement for Resident #73 and Resident #40 repeatedly walking unassisted thereby creating the potential for more than minimal harm. 2. To ensure wander alert equipment was working properly and effectively to ensure the safety of residents at risk for elopement. This deficient practice has the potential to impact 10 residents who currently require the use of personal wander alert devices and are at risk for elopement. Findings include: Resident #73 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #73 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: parkinson’s disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement that may also cause hallucinations (sensory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2586142Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in 5 of 18 residents (Resident #10, #99, #100, #73 & #47) reviewed for accuracy of medical records, resulting in inaccurate treatment records and the potential for providers to not have an accurate picture of resident status and condition.Findings include: According to [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing.High-quality documentation is necessary to enhance efficient, individualized patient care. Quality documentation has five important characteristics: it is factual, accurate, complete, current, and organized . Accessed from: Kindle Locations 24106-24108). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition. Resident #10: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #10 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included paralysis on her right dominant side, stroke, long term use of insulin, pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the explanation of their binding arbitration agreement was explained in a clear and concise manner to residents to ensure understanding at admission for 3 (Resident #71, Resident #37, and Resident #27) and 8 more residents during a confidential group meeting, resulting in residents expressing confusion and concerns regarding entering into and agreeing to a binding arbitration agreement.Findings include:In an interview on 8/11/2025 at 9:15 am, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the facility did not maintain a list of residents who signed a binding arbitration agreement. NHA A informed this surveyor arbitration agreements were in the resident's records and cold be viewed there. This surveyor requested a list of current residents who had signed a binding arbitration agreement.Review of a word document provided by NHA A including a list of residents who signed a binding arbitration agreement, included Resident #27, Resident #37, and Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living. Findings include:During an observation on 08/11/2025 at 8:21 AM, This writer observed outside of room T64 was a sit to stand, the base of it had white powder, dust debris on the it and the footrest had it on it as well. This writer observed the pad where the knees go between the pad and the metal frame had dirt, debris, and white powder. During an observation on 08/11/2025 at 9:19 AM, This writer observed outside of room T67 there was a sit to stand there which had a plastic bag with wipes in it, The foot base and the metal bar where the pad and straps meet at there was dirt and debris there as well. During an observation on 08/12/2025 at 8:47 AM, This writer observed outside of room T64 was a sit to stand, the base of it had white powder, dust debris on the it and the footrest had it on it as well. This writer observed the pad where the knees go…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper documentation and accurate advanced directive information was in place for 2 residents (Resident #102, Resident #98) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility with accurate documentation to support it. Findings include: Resident #102 (R102) Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R102 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 12 out of 15 which indicated R102 had moderate cognitive impairment (8 to 12 cognitively impaired). Review of R102's Facesheet revealed Code Status: Advance Directives: DNR (Do not resuscitate). Review of R102's Orders revealed Advance Directive: DNR. Review of R102's chart revealed no documentation or signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: 2569824Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by staff for 1 (Resident #81) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting Resident #81 experiencing mental anguish, intimidation, and fear. Findings include: Resident #81: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #81 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included depression, and malaise (general feeling of discomfort). Review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) conducted on 5/1/2025, revealed, .BIMS score of 13 out of 15 which indicated Resident #81 was cognitively intact. Review of Care Plan for Resident #81 revised on 2/13/25, revealed the focus, .(Resident #81) has actual impairment to skin integrity to bilateral breasts and abd (abdominal) fold r/t (related to) yeast . with the intervention .antifungal treatment in place .Apply barrier cream per facility protocol to help protect skin from excess moisture .Monitor skin when providing cares, notify nurse of any changes in skin appearance . Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days in 1 (Resident #12) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:Resident #12Review of an admission Record revealed Resident # 12 as a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: depression and anxiety disorder.Review of Physician Order for Resident #12 revealed Lorazepam oral tablet 0.5mg Controlled drug level 4, 1 tablet by mouth PRN every 4 hours start 8/12/2025 with an end date as indefinite.In an interview on 8/13/2025 at 1:14pm, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D reported that PRN medications did not have to have a specific stop date unless the provider indicated a stop date.In an interview on 8/13/2025 at 1:16 pm Nurse Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (NM/LPN) M reported that all PRN medications should be ordered for only 14 days unless a rationale was provided by the provider.In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2586142Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report 2 elopements and an allegation of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner for 2 (Resident #73, Resident #66) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and reporting, resulting in the potential for ongoing mistreatment, as well as additional incidents of elopements and alleged abuse to go unreported.Findings include: Resident #73 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #73 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: parkinson’s disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement that may also cause hallucinations (sensory experiences that seem real but are created by the mind), metabolic encephalopathy (disorder that affects the brain’s function), weakness and anxiety (persistent state of worry). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #73 with a reference date of 6/22/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a proper bedhold notification was completed for 1 resident (Resident #66) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization, resulting in Resident #66's not receiving a written notice of bedhold. Findings include:Resident #66Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #66 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease (a form of dementia) with late onset, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, and visual hallucinations.Review of Resident #66's Census Screen in the electronic medical record revealed effective date 8/6/25, STOP BILLING.In an interview on 8/12/25 at 8:49 AM, Social Services Director (SSD) FF reported resident #66 was sent to a psych (psychiatric) hospital due to ongoing physical behaviors and hallucinations. In an interview on 8/12/25 at 2:41 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the facility did not have a behold for Resident #66 for her hospitalization and could not provide evidence that one had been provided to Resident #66.In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan related to sexual behaviors for 1 resident (Resident #99) of 18 reviewed for care plans resulting in some staff being unaware of Resident #99's behaviors and sexual history.Findings include:Resident #99 (R99)Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R99 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including spinal fracture and alcohol abuse. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R99 was cognitively intact (13 to 15 cognitively intact). R99 had a previous admission at the facility from 4/10/2025 to 4/23/2025.During an observation on 8/11/2025 at 8:18 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) KK was sitting outside R99's bedroom door. CNA KK stated that R99 was on a 1:1 observation at all times for several days but she didn't know why. During an interview on 8/11/2025 at 8:38 AM, R99 stated that he was on 1:1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide timely ADL (activities of daily living) care for 1 resident (Resident #109) of 2 residents reviewed for ADL Care, resulting in Resident #109 not receiving timely incontinence care on 8/10/25 when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) mistakenly thought the resident was independent with personal care. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for skin breakdown, feelings of embarrassment, and unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #109 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: aphasia following a stroke (language disorder that affects a person's ability to verbally communicate), weakness and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #109 with a reference date of 8/11/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated Resident #109…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that follow up with pharmacy recommendations occurred for 1 resident (Resident #57) and monitoring of side effects of psychotropic medications (any medication that affects the mind and alters mental processes such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, sedatives and stimulants) occurred for 2 residents (Resident #57, Resident # 64) of 5 residents reviewed for medications resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and no monitoring and follow-up of potential side effects of medications.Findings include:Resident #57 (R57)Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly and is characterized by thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch of reality, disorganized speech or behavior and decreased participation in daily activities),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1). properly store medications in a secure manner in 2 of 6 medications carts: 2). ensure the interior of medication carts were clean: 3). ensure that medication refrigerators were secured with a lock: and 4). ensure consistent monitoring and documentation of refrigerator temperatures occurred.Findings include:On 8/12/2025 at 8:35 am, Registered Nurse (RN) PPP was observed placing into locked narcotic box on the medication cart for part of the flower unit, a medication cup with one white pill, which she placed tape over the top of the cup, wrote a resident's name on it before placing in the narcotic box and locking the box back up.In an interview on 8/12/2025 at 8:35 am, RN PPP reported the resident refused the pills she placed into the narcotic box. RN PPP reported she would need to waste the pill with another nurse as it was a hydrocodone (Norco) tablet.On 8/12/2025 at 8:57 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P was observed placing into the top drawer of the enchanted medication cart a medication cup with two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered enhanced barrier precautions for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R41) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection to a vulnerable population. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of an admission Record revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of a stroke causing left sided weakness and paralysis and a pressure wound on her coccyx. Review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 08-13-25, revealed a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R2's cognition was intact. During an observation on 09-17-25 at 10:15 AM, the door of R2's room had a sign posted that alerted staff and visitors that R2 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for certain close contact interactions. Review of a physician Order Summary for R2, reflected an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with a start date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct foods as outlined on the planned, posted menu, resulting in dissatisfaction with meal service and feelings of frustration. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume food from the kitchen, out of a total census of 77.Findings include:In an interview on 6/3/25 at 12:33 PM, Resident #104 reported that she had ongoing concerns with the food at the facility. Resident #104 reported that the facility often substituted what was on the menu without notice. Resident #104 reported that she was frustrated with how often the facility was messing up the food menu, and feeling she never knew what was going to be served. In an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:29 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I reported that residents frequently reported concerns about the food at the facility, and that it seemed like the facility was not able to serve what was on the menu often. CNA I reported that it seemed like the facility was not ordering enough food, and they would run out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00152495 and MI00153405. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences and portion sizes at meals were consistently honored, for 7 (Residents #104, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, and #116 ) of 18 residents reviewed for food concerns, resulting in resident/representative complaints of food choices not being honored and the potential for decreased meal enjoyment, feelings of frustration, and the potential for weight loss and nutritional decline. Resident #104 Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104, with a reference date of 5/1/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #104 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #104's Meal Ticket revealed, Diet order: Regular texture. Regular diet. Allergies: Cinnamon. Dislikes: Citrus, spicy foods, BBQ, biscuits and gravy, cabbage, coleslaw, onions, pepper, sausage, potatoes . In an interview on 6/4/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00153405. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were cared for with dignity and respect for 3 (Resident #107, #110, and #117) of 8 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential for feelings of embarrassment, frustration, depression, loss of self-worth and an overall deterioration of psychological well-being. Findings include: Resident #107 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #107 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #107, with a reference date of 5/14/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 which indicated Resident #107 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #107's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #107) has an actual ADL (activities of daily living ) self-care performance deficit . Interventions: .Dining: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff fully implemented the abuse policy and identiry and report allegations of neglect to the abuse coordinator in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #118) of 1 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, resulting in the potential for continued violations involving neglect go unreported. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #118 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included depression and muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #118, with a reference date of 4/11/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #118 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #118's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #118) has actual need for ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance . Interventions: toileting: Check and change. Date initiated: 9/11/24 . In an interview on 6/9/25 at 2:35 PM, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with professional standards in 3 (Resident #104, #105 and #107) of 18 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in 1.) Resident #104 missing medication for multiple days in a row 2.) Nursing staff omitting neurological (neuro) assessments and inaccurately documenting assessments as completed after a fall for Resident #105 and 3.) Resident #107 missing a re-weight check ordered by a physician. Findings include: Resident #104 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104, with a reference date of 5/1/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #104 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #104's Orders revealed, Systane Ophthalmic Solution 0.4-0.3 %…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with toileting and eating for 2 (Resident #107 and Resident #118) of 9 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical outcomes for resident's who are dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: Resident #107 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #107 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #107, with a reference date of 5/14/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 which indicated Resident # 107 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #107's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #107) has an actual ADL (activities of daily living ) self-care performance deficit . Interventions: .Dining: Resident requires feeding assistance x1. NO straws, single sips with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program that included 1) implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) per standards of practices for 2 of 3 residents (R101, and R103), and 2) ensure hand sanitizer was available outside a EBP room for 1 of 3 residents (R102) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination, harborage of bacteria, and increased infections in a vulnerable population. Findings include: R101 Review of R101's medical chart, Diagnoses included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Review of R101's Order Summary dated 2/24/25 did not indicate EBP had been ordered for the resident's open wound. Review of R101's MAR/TAR (Medication/Treatment Administration Record dated 2/1/25-2/28/25 did not indicate EBP were being monitored. Review of R101's Care Plan did not indicate the resident had a wound vac or was placed on EBP. During an observation on 2/25/25 at 9:47 AM of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00147450. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors in 1 of 3 residents (R101) reviewed for medication errors resulting in R101 receiving insulin that was not ordered causing dizziness and general malaise. Findings include: Review of R101's Incident Report dated 10/5/2024 at 12:03 PM reported a medication error had been reported with insulin being given incorrectly. R101 stated to Unit Manager (UM) E that he felt dizzy and knew his sugar (blood sugar) had been checked and was poked in his arm by a shot. No statements by staff or notifications had been found or listed. Review of R101's MDS (Material Data Set) dated 11/22/24 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview Status) of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive function. Review of R101's Diagnoses did not have diabetes mellitus documented. Review of R101's Order Summary print date 2/11/25, did not have any insulin ordered for administration. During an interview on 2/10/25 at 9:47 AM, Family Member (FM) C stated, My brother…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00147450. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for medication labeling, with the potential to cause side effects and infection control issues. Findings include: Review of R103's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 2/1/25 to 2/28/25 revealed, Lantus 100 unit/ml 8 units. During an observation, interview, and record review on 2/11/25 at 7:12 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Charge Nurse J compiled morning medications for R103 from the Enchanted Gardens med cart. On the resident's eMAR (electronic medication administration record) was a current and clear picture of him. Medications that the LPN gathered included Lantus 100 units/ml (millimeter) injectable pen. Approximately 80-90 units were left in the pen which originally held 100 units. The pen was labeled with the resident's name but was not labeled with the date it was opened nor the date the medication was to expire once opened. LPN J reported the insulin should have an open date for the integrity of the medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake # MI00147450. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for agency staff consistent with their role in the facility to ensure the safety of resident in 1 of 3 residents (R101) reviewed for medication administration, resulting in R101 receiving an unordered medication and sustaining dizziness and overall malaise. Findings include: Review of R101's Incident Report dated 10/5/2024 at 12:03 PM reported a medication error had been reported with insulin being given incorrectly. R101 stated to Unit Manager (UM) E that he felt dizzy and knew his sugar (blood sugar) had been checked and was poked in his arm by a shot. No statements by staff or notifications had been found or listed. Review of R101's MDS (Material Data Set) dated 11/22/24 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview Status) of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive function. Review of R101's Diagnoses did not have diabetes mellitus documented. Review of R101's Order Summary print date 2/11/25, did not have any insulin ordered for administration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and assess one resident (R100) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care, resulting in the potential of slow healing wounds, and/or new pressure ulcers developing and the mismanagement of treatment and not receiving adequate care required to maintain or achieve their highest practicable physical well-being. Findings include: R100 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R100 scored 13/15 (cognitively intact) on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), indicated dependence on staff for all cares, and diagnoses that included a sacral pressure ulcer. Section E reported the resident did not reject care that was necessary to achieve goals for health and well-being. During an interview on 9/13/2024 at 11:28 AM, Family Member (FM) F stated, Someone from the family is with my mother (R100) to visit with her and feed her lunch and dinner Monday through Friday. And at least once a day for lunch or dinner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was used during transfers for two of two residents (R100 and R102) reviewed for safe transfers, resulting in the potential for a fall or fall with injury. Findings include: R100 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R100 scored 13/15 (cognitively intact) on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), indicated dependence on staff for all cares, and diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease. Review of R100's Care Plan, dated 9/17/24, indicated a Focus needs assistance with ADLs due to Parkinson's, debility, and fatigue. The goal was for the resident was to maintain current level of function with interventions that included Transfers .requires 2 person moderate to maximum physical assistance. It was noted the survey start date was 9/17/24. During an observation on 9/17/24 at 9:35 AM R100 was transferred to a recliner next to her bed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E did not use a gait belt on R100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices were put in place to ensure proper PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) provided for two of two residents (R100 and R102) reviewed for infection control, resulting in an increased potential of cross-contamination of disease in a vulnerable population. Findings include: R100 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R100 scored 13/15 (cognitively intact) on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), indicated dependence on staff for all cares, and diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease and sacral pressure ulcer. Section E reported the resident did not reject care that was necessary to achieve goals for health and well-being. Review of R100's Order Summary, dated 8/1/2024, Coccyx wound . Review of R100's Order Summary, dated 8/27/2024, Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to wound Review of R100's Care Plan, dated 9/9/24, did not include a resident-specific plan for Enhanced Barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 9:35 AM on 8/27/24, observation of the walk-in cooler found some storage racks had heavy accumulation of gunk debris between portions of the shelf and the flat storage surface. Once the surfaces were pointed out to Director of Dining Services (DDS) N, he stated they needed to be cleaned. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 9:41 AM on 8/27/24, an interview with DDS N found that clean utensil are stored in bins next to the hand sink. Observation of two clean utensil bins containing mechanical scoops and spoons found an increased amount of crumb debris present in the bottom of the bins. DDS N stated they should be getting cleaned weekly. During the initial tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of facility-initiated transfers/discharges since November 2019, resulting in the potential for all residents to be discharged without an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights. Findings include: On 8/23/2024 at 1:41 PM, an email was received from the State LTC Ombudsman (Ombudsman) I which stated, .They (Borgess Gardens) are not sending the required notices for transfer and discharges (to her). During an interview on 8/28/2024 at 11:53 AM, Director of Social Work (DSW) X and Social Worker (SW) II stated that they haven't been sending the required notices for transfers and discharges to the State LTC Ombudsman. SW II said that they used to send it to the Ombudsman monthly but they haven't sent the notices in a long time. During another interview on 8/28/24 at 12:03 PM, SW II stated that she found an email of the last notice of transfers and discharges that she sent to the State Ombudsman which was dated November 2019. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely care and services to promote dignity in 1 (Resident #37) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity/respect, resulting in long call light wait times, delay in incontinence care, and the potential for feelings of diminished self-worth and frustration. Findings include: Resident #37 Review of a Resident Summary revealed Resident #37 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting left (left sided paralysis after a stroke), pain in left shoulder, and pain in right shoulder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #37, with a reference date of 7/20/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Further review of said MDS revealed Resident #37 had a functional limitation in range of motion on one side for both upper extremity and lower extremity, that Resident #37 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and that Resident #37 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the inability to call for staff assistance and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #10 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included osteoarthritis. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10, with a reference date of 7/4/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 which indicated Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #10's Care Plan revealed, .Communication: (Resident #10) is at risk for impaired communication related to change in environment .Interventions: .call light within reach. Date initiated: 11/30/23 . During an observation and interview on 8/27/24 at 12:18 PM, Resident #10 was lying in bed watching television.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment in 2 of 2 residents (Resident #53 & #54) reviewed for a clean, comfortable, homelike environment, resulting in soiled fans and the potential for respiratory complications. Findings include: Review of the policy/procedure High Profile Patient Room Cleaning, dated 2/1/22, revealed .High dust, beginning at the entranceway and working around the room in a circle. High dust horizontal surfaces above shoulder height starting opposite the restroom. Never dust above a patient/resident. High dust surfaces in the restroom .disinfect vertical surfaces including stains and spots from walls, light switches, door knobs and other relevant vertical surfaces . Resident #53 Review of a Profile Face Sheet revealed Resident #53 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included respiratory failure, heart failure, kidney disease, obstructive lung disease, vascular disease, high blood pressure, depression, and diabetes. In an observation on 8/27/24 at 11:41 AM, Resident #53 was in bed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff fully implemented the abuse policy and report allegations of neglect to the abuse coordinator in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, resulting in the potential for continued violations involving neglect go unreported. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included parkisons disease. Review of Resident #6's Concern/Grievance form dated 8/27/24 revealed, Information about your concerns: On 8/27/24 (Resident #6) said that she was wet. The night aide came to change her at 6:10 PM. (Resident #6) was soaked and soiled. Her pants and her chair were soaked. The aide was so upset that she (Resident #6) had appeared to not had been changed at all during the day. She called (Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN-UM)) BB. This is not an isolated occurrence as her laundry is always soaked in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of neglect to the State Agency in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, resulting in the potential for continued violations involving neglect going undetected, unreported, or without thorough investigation. Findings include: Resident #6 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included parkisons disease. Review of Resident #6's Concern/Grievance form dated 8/27/24 revealed, Information about your concerns: On 8/27/24 (Resident #6) said that she was wet. The night aide came to change her at 6:10 PM. (Resident #6) was soaked and soiled. Her pants and her chair were soaked. The aide was so upset that she (Resident #6) had appeared to not had been changed at all during the day. She called (Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN-UM)) BB. This is not an isolated occurrence as her laundry is always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions and orders for 2 (Resident # 50 and #43) of 18 Residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in a potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #50 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #50 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure. Review of Resident #50's Care Plan revealed, . Nutritional Status: . Meal Assistance as needed. Date initiated: 6/27/23 . Review of Resident #50's Orders revealed, .Feeding Assistance with meals. Start date: 8/9/24 . During an observation on 8/28/24 at 12:35 PM, Resident #50 was sitting in the dining area with her lunch tray in front of her. Resident #50 was attempting to eat with a spoon. Resident #50 spilled all of the food contents from the spoon onto her lap several times. Resident #50 had several pieces of food on her shirt and pants. It was noted that there were no staff in the area to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a change of skin condition in 1 of 5 residents (R43) reviewed for quality of care, resulting in a delay in assessment, treatment, pain, and the potential for worsening of condition and infection. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R43 was severely cognitively impaired with indication he was unable to complete his BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), required assistance with turning/positioning, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, age-related physical debility, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and repeated falls. Review of R43's MDS dated [DATE], Section M-Skin Conditions revealed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers with an unhealed stage 3 and skin tears. Treatments/interventions for both pressure ulcer and skin tears included pressure ulcer care, and application of nonsurgical dressings. Review of R43's Physician Orders, dated 1/28/2022, revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for use of oxygen for 1 (Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in inaccurate settings, irregular cleaning, and the potential for respiratory infection. Findings include: Resident #10 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that affects arteries in the lungs and in the heart). Review of Resident #10's Orders revealed, Change oxygen tubing weekly and label with date. Start date: 6/24/24 . Oxygen at 2 liters/minute per NC (nasal cannula) to keep sats (oxygen saturation) above 92% . During an observation on 8/27/24 at 12:18 PM, Resident #10 was lying in bed wearing her oxygen via nasal cannula. It was noted that Resident #10's oxygen was running at 3.5 liters/minute and the tubing on the oxygen tank was dated 8/19/24. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. provide documentation of an adequate indication for medication use, 2. educate the resident/guardian on the intended or actual benefit versus potential risk(s) or adverse consequences associated with the selected medication, and 3. identify, care plan, and implement non-pharmacological interventions for 1 (Resident #57) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unmet psychosocial needs and the resident to have received an unnecessary medication. Findings include: Resident #57 Review of a Resident Summary revealed Resident #57 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: anxiety disorder, unspecified. Review of a Physician's Order for Resident #57 revealed, Order Date 02/15/24, Start Date 3/01/24 Zoloft 25 mg (milligram) tablet (Sertraline) - 1 tablet By Mouth Every Day for anxiety Review of Resident #57's current Care Plan revealed a focus of (Resident #57) has a mood state problem related to Anxiety and the entirety of care planned interventions for this focus which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement a policy regarding use and storage of resident foods brought in from outside sources in one resident personal refirgerator (Resident #53) and one of four shared resident refrigerators. This deficient practice resulted in unknown discard dates and potentially hazardous foods being held passed their discard date, increasing the risk of contamination and food borne illness among residents who store personal food in the facility. Findings Include: An interview with Director of Dining Services (DDS) N at 10:18 AM on 8/27/24, regarding the four bistro areas of the facility, found that kitchen staff stock the bistro kitchen refrigeration units once a day and that housekeeping staff should clean the bistro once a day. When asked who takes care of resident food from outside sources, DDS N stated that nursing staff takes care of the labeling and dating of that product and it goes in the separate resident fridge which each bistro has. During a tour of the Heirloom Garden Bistro, at 11:18 AM on 8/27/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during brief change and wound dressing change, resulting in the potential for bacterial harborage, cross contamination, and the spread of disease to a vulnerable population. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R43 was severely cognitively impaired with indication he was unable to complete his BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), required assistance with turning / positioning, brief changes, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, age-related physical debility, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R43's MDS dated [DATE], Section M-Skin Conditions revealed the resident had an unhealed stage 3 pressure ulcer and skin tears. Treatments/interventions for both pressure ulcer and skin tears included wound care, and application of nonsurgical dressings. Review of R43's Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were screened for eligibility to receive pneumococcal vaccinations and receive vaccination if eligible for 1 (Resident #2 ) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations, resulting in the potential of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal pneumonia. Findings include: Resident #2 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of Resident 2's Immunization Record revealed that Resident # 2 had not received the Pneumococcal vaccine. Review of Resident #2's Vaccine History and Consent form dated 10/2/22 revealed that Resident #2 wished to receive the CDC recommended Pneumococcal vaccine . During an interview on 8/28/24 at 1:00 PM, Infection Preventionist (IP) EE reported that Resident #2 was currently due and eligible for an updated Pneumococcal vaccine. IP EE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 immunizations were offered to 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2, #50 and #53) reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations, resulting in an increased risk for infection, and the potential spread of COVID-19 infection to other residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: Resident #2 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of Resident #2 Immunization Record revealed that Resident #2 had not received a Covid-19 vaccine. Review of Resident #2's Vaccine History and Consent form dated 10/2/22 revealed that Resident # 2 had wished to receive the Covid-19 vaccination During an interview on 8/28/24 at 1:00 PM, Infection Preventionist (IP) EE reported that Resident #2 was currently due and eligible for an updated Covid-19 vaccine. IP EE reported that the facility had missed assessing and administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a fall and review and revise the care plan for 1 (Resident #103) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards, resulting in the potential for additional falls and injury. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was a male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: history of falling, muscle weakness, long term use of anticoagulants, and Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors). Review of Resident #103's Interdisciplinary Note dated 12/24/23 at 11:39 AM revealed, Patient up to wheelchair this morning for breakfast. Observed on the floor with face down on the floor and hands on the side. Resident states, I don't know whats wrong. Alert and oriented x3. Denies pain at time of fall. Skin tears noted to face, arms and right lower extremity. Resident able to move extremities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00138567 and MI00139004. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.) ensure residents received consistent and comprehensive skin/wound assessments, 2.) ensure physician orders for skin treatments were implemented, and 3.) perform STAT (immediate) blood work as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #101), reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the lack of assessment, monitoring, and documentation and the potential for the worsening of a medical condition and the delay in treatment. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 7/11/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #101 was cognitively intact. Review of the Functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Clean food and non-food contact surfaces to sight and touch; 2. Datemark and discard potentially hazardous foods; 3. Have an irreversible measuring indicator to ensure proper working order of the dish machine; 4. Maintain plumbing in good repair; 5. Properly store CO2 containers; and 6. Ensure proper cooling of potentially hazardous foods. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 73 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 9:48 AM on 7/10/23, with Food and Nutritional Services Director (FNSD) I, it was observed that black debris was evident on gaskets of the four door traulson cooler. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 9:50 AM on 7/10/23, it was observed that the delfield preparation cooler was found with increased amounts of debris in the top of the gaskets. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 10:10 AM on 7/10/23, observation of the bulk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes # MI00128996, # MI00135026, & # MI00136953. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet resident needs for 5 (Resident #10, Resident #282, Resident #8, Resident #88, and Resident #182) of 18 residents reviewed for staffing, resulting in long call light wait times, residents being left wet and soiled, and the potential for unmet needs for all residents of the facility. Findings include: According to [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 1589-1592). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition.Time management, therapeutic communication, patient education, and compassionate implementation of bedside skills are just a few of the essential skills you need. It is important for your patients to leave the health care setting with a positive image of nursing and a feeling that they received quality care. Your patients should never feel rushed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident medications were labeled and stored securely in 4 of 10 residents (Residents #33, #38, #59, & #51) reviewed for medication administration, and 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for labeling and secure medication storage, resulting in the potential for decreased efficacy of and/or adverse reactions to medications, and the potential for residents, visitors, and/or staff to have unauthorized access to medications. Findings include: Resident #33 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #33, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: Schizophrenia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #33, with a reference date of 4/21/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 which indicated Resident #33 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 7/10/23 at 10:19 AM, noted an unlabeled medication cup which contained clear-colored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficiency Practice Statements, A and B. Deficiency Practice Statement A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice effective infection control techniques for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #333) reviewed for infection control during medication administration, resulting in the potential spread of infection when improper hand hygiene techniques were not performed during a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line flush. Findings include: Resident #333 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #333, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: Surgical replacement of the hip. Review of a Physician Order revealed: Intermittent flush mid line: 5 mls Normal saline before and after medications & - 5 mls intravenous every day for maintenance. During an observation on 7/12/23 at 08:45 AM, in Resident #333's room, Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) II entered the room, then exited the room to find a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) detailing estimated charges for continued services in 2 of 3 residents (Resident #4 & #28) reviewed for timely provision of notifications, resulting in the potential for residents/resident representatives to be unaware of changes in regard to financial liability. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) information related to Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) forms, page last updated 12/1/21, revealed .Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) must issue a notice to Original Medicare (fee for service - FFS) beneficiaries in order to transfer potential financial liability before the SNF provides .an item or service that is usually paid for by Medicare, but may not be paid for in this particular instance because it is not medically reasonable and necessary, or .custodial care .For Part A items and services: SNFs use the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00130678. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free fom staff to resident verbal and mental abuse and mistreatment for 3 (Resident #82, #10, and #333) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and dignity, resulting in residents feeling uncomfortable and anxious around the staff and the likelihood of feelings of embarrassment, humiliation and dehumanization. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that included: muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, adult failure to thrive and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (neurological disorder causing progressive weakness). Review of the Facility Reported Incident received by the State Agency on 8/8/22 revealed that on 8/01/22, Resident #82 verbalized feeling emotionally abused by Certified Nursing Assistant (CENA) QQ and that she had seen CENA QQ badgering/intimidating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00136953. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing/showers per identified resident needs and preferences for 2 residents (R8 and R88) of 17 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care, resulting in psychosocial sadness, and the potential of poor hygiene, skin irritation and breakdown. Findings include: R8 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R8 scored 12/15 (moderately cognitively impaired) on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and anxiety. These diagnoses along with impairment in both her legs and occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder, required R8 to receive extensive physical assistance from one person for turning/positioning in bed, transfers, and mobility on the units. To use the toilet, R8 required two-person physical assistance. Observed on 7/10/2023 at 10:12 AM R8 had outside of her room in the hall a transmission-based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to identify PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) triggers and implement interventions to mitigate triggers for 1 of 18 residents (Resident # 283) reviewed for trauma informed care, resulting in the potential risk of re-traumatization. Findings include: A review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #283 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that included: depression, encephalopathy, seizure disorder, suicidal tendency. In an interview on 7/10/23 at 1:50pm, Resident #283 reported feeling depressed, had thoughts of suicide prior to this admission and had lifelong history of trauma including abusive relationships and the violent loss of a child. Resident #283 reported she felt anxious about being at the facility. In an interview on 7/10/23 at 3:01pm, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported Resident #283 had a lifelong history of trauma, some of which centered around a crime committed against Resident #283's child, that the legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,130 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $45,130 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-10 for 23 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AARON FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 31% | since 09/03/2024 |
| AB INVESTMENT TRUST U/A/D 01/03/23 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 13% | since 09/03/2024 |
| BAUMOL, YEHOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 27% | since 09/03/2024 |
| AARON, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| CUDNEY, KIERSTEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| GRAF, MARCELLA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| OPRESCU, NICOARA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
| OMNIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/23/2024 |
| 3057 GULL ROAD LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/12/2024 |
| ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| ISRAEL INVESTMENT TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| TODD A STERN 2015 IRRV INS TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/23/2024 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2024 |
| NAGEL, STEVEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235289. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.