No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Villa at Silverbell Estates

1255 West Silverbell Road, Orion, MI 48359 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (248) 391-0900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (248) 391-0900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)4 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$36,030 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,030 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
4403 Interpark Dr.
Pharmacy
4350 Joslyn Rd · (248) 391-6697 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3850 Joslyn Rd · (248) 393-0752 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2525 Joslyn Rd · (248) 393-7040 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.7%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms98.2%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.1%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.7%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.2%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.1%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine38.0%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.9%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.691.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.651.641.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.8%CMS range 28.3–57.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.6–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.8–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
57.4%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 87.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 3006638.Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure consistent and appropriate wound management by not completing an admission Braden assessment, not ensuring the timely implementation of wound treatments as ordered by the wound clinician, failing to consistently provide prescribed wound care treatments, failing to timely identify and report to the Physician of the worsening of the wound, and failing to complete labs as directed by the Physician for one (R404) of one resident reviewed for pressure wounds, which resulted in a change of condition and required prolonged hospitalization. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . the resident was admitted to the hospital with a major infection, rectal bleeding, and stage 3 (full-thickness loss of skin, in which fat may be visible in the ulcer) and stage 4 (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake #2685189Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer via a Hoyer lift for one (R701) out of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in R701 sustaining a fracture to the right femur that required surgery and an extensive hospital stay. Findings included: Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer via a Hoyer lift for one (R701) of two reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with fracture to the right femur, pain and Hospital stay. Findings include:On or about 11/21/25 a FRI (Facility Reported Incident) was reported to the State Agency (SA) that noted on 11/21/25, R701 was being transferred from their bed to a wheelchair via a Hoyer lift and the sling snapped and the resident fell to the floor. R701 complained of pain , x-rays were ordered, and the resident was sent to the Hospital.Hospital records dated 11/21/25 were reviewed and documented, in part: (R701) .is coming from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R80 Record review revealed R80 was a long-term resident of the facility, originally admitted on [DATE]. R80 had a recent hospitalization and they were readmitted back to the facility on 3/18/25. R80's admitting diagnoses included pneumonia, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and gout. Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R80 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 9/15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. R80 had a guardian (daughter) who was making decisions on their behalf. An initial observation was completed on 6/17/25 at approximately 10:20 AM, R80 was observed in their bed with a brief. They had their eyes closed but opened their eyes when called upon but did not answer to any questions. At approximately 11:15 AM, during a follow up observation from the doorway, R80 was observed with a brief only, no other clothes. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) T assigned to care for R80 was observed in the hallway and reported that R80…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with major injury for one Resident (R47) of two residents reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm for R47, who sustained a left ankle fracture, and a subsequent infection. Findings include: On 6/16/25 at 9:34 a.m., R47 was observed seated in their manual upright wheelchair in the dining room. R47 was leaning to the right side, with their weight distributed mainly over their right hip. Neither leg was supported by footrests. On 6/16/25 at 9:36 a.m., R47 stated, I was standing up to get in my wheelchair and I fell. I broke my foot a few months ago. I have healed up good .They put metal in it (surgical fixation to anchor the joint). R47 explained they fell transferring from their bed to their wheelchair, and they had to have surgery to fix their foot. R47 showed this Surveyor one finger, and stated, There was one person (staff assisting them), and I think there should have been two (staff assisting them) . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00140190 & MI00140245. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate wound assessments, timely implementation of treatment for identified wounds, coordination of care and wound services and ensure a collaborative approach for wound healing was completed with the dietician for two (R's 501 & 506) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds, resulting in R506 to have developed an infected unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) buttocks/sacral wound (after debridement identified as a Stage III- full thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissues and rolled wound edges are often present- buttock/sacral wound) that required the resident to be transferred and admitted to the hospital due to sepsis from an infected buttock/sacral ulcer. Findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 3006638.Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to acknowledge, investigate and follow up on concerns reported by the family of one R404 of one resident reviewed for grievances.Findings included:A review of complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . $20.00. was missing from (R404) bedside drawer. the resident's cell phone was missing. these items went missing after (the complainant) complained to staff about the lack of care being provided to the resident. The complainant states she sent several emails to the head nurse, administrator, nursing staff and head office person, but had not received a response.A review of the medical record revealed R404 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia (paralysis of one entire side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis affecting only one side of the body) following intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the right dominant side and mild…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 05/04/2026 at 8:45 AM on a kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM) S observed the walk-in freezer with frozen condensate build up on shelving and floor. Also observed the interior of the walk-in cooler door damaged with the surface material pulling away from the door creating an exposed sharp edge and the surface is no longer smooth and cleanable. When queried during these observations, DM S said that repair requests have been entered in the electronic maintenance tracking system for both issues.On 05/04/2026 at 9:50 AM observed Pinegrove dining room ice machine drain tray full of water and overflowing onto the floor surface. When queried, the Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) T brought the maintenance director (MD) K to also observe the backed-up drain. MD K indicated that it would be addressed right away.On 05/04/2026 at 9:55 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly dispose of waste and maintain the dumpster area to mitigate the presence of pests, potentially affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include:On 05/04/2026 at 9:40 AM observed the outside garbage enclosure with several items within and adjacent to the enclosure including a pile of approximately 10 wood pallets, a grill, a small refrigerator, and a cabinet unit. Also observed many pieces of loose litter items including food wrappers and used gloves on the ground in the adjacent wooded area. On 05/04/2026 at 3:45 PM interviewed maintenance director (MD) K about the items stored in and adjacent to the garbage enclosure and it was indicated that they were intended for disposal and would be removed as soon as possible, including large items into the dumpster as space was available.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general repair and safe conditions of the premises. This resulted in an increased potential for safety concerns and contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living (including for residents R40 and R87). Findings Include: R87 On 5/3/26 at approximately 9:37 AM, R87 was observed lying in bed. An extension cord that was covered with plastic was plugged into the wall and ran across the resident bed. The resident reported that they use the extension cord to charge their cell phone. On 5/5/26 at approximately 1:16 PM, the extension cord was still plugged into the wall and lying on the resident's bed. R40 On 5/3/26 at approximately 9:53 AM, R40 was observed lying in bed. They had an extension cord plugged into the wall and their cell phone was attached to the cord that ran across their bed. On 5/3/26 at approximately 1:20 PM, the extension cord remained plugged into the wall and the resident's phone was attached. On 05/05/2026 at 11:05 AM observed an extension cord running from wall outlet to the bed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure irregularities identified by consultant pharmacist were addressed and noted in the resident's electronic record for five (R4, R6, R8, R11 and R36) of five residents reviewed for monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR). Findings Include:R6 A review of R6's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type II diabetes, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder Continued review of R6's clinical record revealed the following MRRs notes dated: 3/29/26, 2/24/26, 10/28/25, 9/10/25, and 8/24/25 documented See reports for comment. There was no documentation available in the resident's clinical record of what the reports documented and/or the physician response to the pharmacy recommendations. R8 A review of R8's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: senile degeneration of brain, type II diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were appropriately stored in a safe/sanitary manner in one of two medication carts, and one of one treatment cart reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:On 5/3/26 at 8:30 AM, observation of the treatment cart in the hallway outside of the small dining room revealed the cart was unlocked and there were treatment/biological supplies were stored in the cart.On 5/4/26 at 9:41 AM, observation of the medication cart with Nurse 'F' revealed the following concerns:The drawer that contained several bottles of liquids was heavily soiled with sticky debris on the bottom of the drawer.A bottle of liquid nutritional supplement was labelled as opened on 4/15/26 and was observed to have a dark tan sticky substance around the lid and on the side of the bottle.The same dark tan, sticky substance was also observed covering a package of generic heartburn relief medication that was labelled as opened on 3/25/26 in another storage compartment of the same medication drawer.When asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible to the resident for three (R8, R47, and R93) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include:R8 On 5/3/26 at approximately 9:27 AM, R8 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer some questions asked. R8 reported that they were very thirsty and wanted a soda pop. The resident was asked to press their call light for assistance. The resident reported that they did not have a call light. R8's roommate stated that they would press theirs. Two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) identified as CNA P and CNA Q responded to R8's roommate's call light. Both CNAs could not locate the resident's call light and told the resident they could not provide a soda pop as R8 needed to give them money to purchase it. R8 did not have the money, and the CNAs left the room. The Administrator entered R8's room and R8 again asked for the soda pop and noted that they did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently identify targeted symptoms and implement non-pharmacological interventions to manage impulsive and anxious behavior prior to the administration of multiple PRN (as-needed) anti-anxiety medication for one (R5) of one resident reviewed for chemical restraints, resulting in the resident being chemically restrained for staff convenience and the inability to monitor the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to lack of supporting documentation. Findings include:On 5/3/26 at 10:38 AM, R5 was observed self-propelling throughout the hallway while seated in a wheelchair. R5 was attempted to be interviewed but there was no response and then proceeded down the hallway. A staff member who observed this interaction expressed use of caution because R5 was easily agitated.Review of the clinical record revealed R5 was admitted into the facility on 1/5/26 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: unspecified dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan to address a resident's use of psychotropic medication and specific targeted behaviors, and non-pharmacological interventions for one (R5) of 18 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include:On 5/3/26 at 10:38 AM, R5 was observed self-propelling throughout the hallway while seated in a wheelchair. R5 was attempted to be interviewed but there was no response and then proceeded down the hallway. A staff member who observed this interaction expressed use of caution because R5 was easily agitated.Review of the clinical record revealed R5 was admitted into the facility on 1/5/26 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, epilepsy unspecified intractable with status epilepticus, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms) and engage gown and glove use during high contact resident care for wound care dressing changes for one (R72) of one reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Findings include.Clinical record review revealed R72 was admitted to the facility for long term care on 7/24/23 with a medical history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) malnutrition, and peripheral vascular disease. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 2/2/26 scored 8/15 indicating R72 had mild cognitive impairment.On 5/03/26 at 10:03 AM, during initial pool interview, R72 was observed with their right foot elevated on a thick folded blanket dressed in white gauze and closed with tape. When inquired, R72 said they had a sore on their ankle, and the Nurses are putting medications on it. Upon exiting the room there was no signage observed for R72 on Enhanced Barrier Precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2737537. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor an advanced directive for one resident (R902) of one resident reviewed for code status/advanced directives, resulting in five rounds of CRP/chest compressions (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) being performed against their wishes and subsequent emergency transfer to an acute care hospital. Findings include:On [DATE] a concern submitted to the State Agency (SA) was reviewed which alleged the facility did not honor a residents' advanced directive/code status.On [DATE] at 10:59 a.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was queried if the facility had completed any recent CPR/Code events on any younger male residents in the facility, and they reported that R902 had a Code Blue ran on them in late January/early February.On [DATE] at approximately 11:05 a.m., The DON was queried regarding R902's CPR event on [DATE] and they reported they had identified some issues with the process of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2582127.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator within the required timeframe for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that on 7/25/25 at 8:00 PM, R801 was observed to not be herself, she wasn't speaking and seemed to have a change in condition. It was alleged R801 had bruising around the resident's collar bone area. A full body assessment was completed, the Administrator was contacted, and R801 was sent to the hospital for further assessment. It was alleged R801 was dropped from the (mechanical) lift by (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA 'B' earlier in the day.On 9/2/25 at 8:07 AM, an interview was conducted with the complainant. When queried about what happened with R801, the complainant reported they believed R801 was injuring while being given a shower by CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2582127.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess the resident's skin and conduct a thorough assessment for a potential change in condition for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed allegations that on 7/25/25, when rounding on the residents, R801 appeared to not be herself, she wasn't speaking and seemed to have a change in condition. It was alleged R801 had bruising around the collar bone area and was sent to the hospital. On 9/2/25 at 10:18 AM, R801 was observed lying in bed. When asked if she injured herself recently, she said she did. When asked how it happened, she said she fell. When asked for more details she said I don't remember. When asked what kind of injury she had she said I don't remember but said it was her shoulder. R801 appeared contracted in the lower extremities as her legs were bent up toward her body. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet the care needs of the residents, with the potential to affect all residents (including R10 and R85). Findings include: Review of the data staffing report submitted to the State Agency for the Second Quarter of 2025 (January 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025) revealed the facility triggered for low weekend staffing and had a one-star rating for staffing (below average staffing), yielding staffing concerns for the facility. On 6/16/25 at 9:05 AM, R85 was observed sitting in a wheelchair. When asked about care at the facility, R85 explained it depended on how many staff were working on the weekends, especially when there was not enough staff. R85 explained what would normally take a half hour would take two hours or more. R85 was asked what specifically would take that long. R85 explained since they required two staff plus a mechanical lift, getting into or out of bed was difficult when there was not enough staff. On 6/17/25 at 11:00 AM a Resident Council meeting was conducted with seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 6/16/25 at approximately 9:07 AM, a refrigerator located in the large resident dining room was observed. A piece of paper was taped on the door that read: Resident Fridge Only ensure food is labeled and dated. Upon opening the refrigerator, the following medications were observed in the bottom drawer: Semglee (insulin), Lantus (insulin x2), TPN (Total Parenteral Nutrition x2 bags), Thiamine (Vitamin B1 x2), Infuvite (multivitamin x2) and SMOFLipid (lipid injectable used in parenteral nutrition x2). On 6/16/25 at approximately 10:34 AM, an observation and interview were conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON was queried as to why resident's medications were stored in the Resident Fridge (Only). The DON reported that the fridge located in the storage room was not working and a new fridge was ordered. The DON was not able to provide the date the fridge stopped working and an actual order form. On 6/17/25 at approximately 10:34 AM and again on 6/18/25 prior to exit at approximately 2:00 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by a resident for two (R53 and R78) of four residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in R53 and R78 verbally abusing and intimidating each other on multiple occasions leading to R53 punching R78 in the stomach and on a different occasion, R78 hitting R53 in the face. Findings include: R53 On 6/16/25 at approximately 8:54 AM, R53 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The resident was only wearing a brief and indicated that he usually does not care to wear other clothes. R53 was queried about care in the facility and reported that a few days prior another resident hit him, pointing to the area on his right side. The resident noted that it caused pain. R53 was not able to provide the name of the resident but did provide a description. R53 reported the resident who hit him is always in the hallway yelling. A review of R53's clinical record revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations/incidents of resident-to-resident physical and verbal abuse to the State Agency (SA) for two residents (R53 and R78) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R53 On 6/16/25 at approximately 8:54 AM, R53 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The resident was only wearing a brief and indicated that he usually does not care to wear other clothes. R53 was queried about care in the facility and reported that a few days prior another resident hit him, pointing to the area on his right side. The resident noted that it caused pain. R53 was not able to provide the name of the resident but did provide a description. R53 reported the resident who hit him is always in the hallway yelling. A review of R53's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cerebral infarction (stroke), Type II diabetes and memory deficit. A review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and actual abuse for two (R53 and R78) and potential unidentified residents out of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R53 On 6/16/25 at approximately 8:54 AM, R53 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The resident was only wearing a brief and indicated that he usually does not care to wear other clothes. R53 was queried about care in the facility and reported that a few days prior another resident hit him, pointing to the area on his right side. The resident noted that it caused pain. R53 was not able to provide the name of the resident but did provide a description. R53 reported the resident who hit him is always in the hallway yelling. A review of R53's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cerebral infarction (stroke), Type II diabetes and memory deficit. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received routine nail care for one (R34) out of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Finding include: On 6/16/25 at approximately 8:54 AM, R34 was observed lying in bed. They had long fingernails extending approximately one quarter inch past the nail bed with brown debris under multiple nails. R34 was asked about the nails and noted they needed to be cut. On 6/17/25 at approximately 8:55 AM, the resident's nails remained long with dark debris underneath most of their nails. On 6/18/25 at approximately 8:38 AM, R34's nails again appeared long with debris. R34 was asked if they would allow staff to cut their nails and they indicated that they would. On 6/18/25 at approximately 8:40 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y was observed in the hall. CAN Y was asked as to the facility policy regarding cutting resident's nails, they indicated that nails are usually care for on resident's shower days. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R78 On 6/16/25 at 9:25 AM, R78 was observed standing in their room. R78 was asked if he had any concerns at the facility. R78 explained he would walk around the whole facility for exercise . had clocked it so he knew how many miles he walked a day . there was another resident, he only knew their first name, that would always flip his middle finger at him every time he walked past . one day he was walking and this resident had his wheelchair in the doorway of his room . he ignored him when he went past . the next time around this resident was all the way in the hall . he thought he wanted to talk to him so he stopped and asked what he wanted . the resident flipped him the middle finger, so he grabbed his finger . the resident hit him in the stomach, so he pushed his index fingers in his eyes . the nurses came and were yelling at us . he put his hands up and stepped away from the resident. Review of the clinical record revealed R78 was admitted into the facility on 2/8/25 with diagnoses that included: epilepsy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Physician ordered laboratory (lab) diagnostic was completed and failed to notify the physician/provider timely on abnormal lab results for one resident (R80) of one resident reviewed for diagnostics, resulting in the potential for decline in health conditions. Findings include: Record review revealed that R80 was a long-term resident of the facility, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R80 had a recent hospitalization and they were readmitted back to the facility on 3/18/25. R80's admitting diagnoses included pneumonia, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and gout. Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R80 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 9/15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. R80 had a guardian (daughter) who was making decisions on their behalf. Review of R80's physician orders revealed an order dated 6/9/25 for the following diagnostics:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a urinary catheter drainage bag (s) (leg bag and bedside/night bags) in a sanitary manner for one of one sampled resident (R44) reviewed for infection control with urinary catheter with potential for contamination and spread of disease to a vulnerable population. Findings Include: Record review revealed R44 was long term resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R44's admitting diagnoses included myelopathy, bipolar disorder, and neuro muscular dysfunction of the bladder. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R44 had a urinary catheter due to their medical condition. R44 needed some level of staff assistance to complete their lower body dressing and toileting hygiene tasks. An initial observation was completed on 6/16/25 at approximately 9:30 AM. R44's room door had a signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00147108 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled pain medication was available per physician orders and maintain accurate documentation of controlled substances for one (R601) of three residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged in part, .(R601) has chronic pain . (R601) feels as though (they) must beg to get (their) medication . On 10/8/24 at 10:23 AM, R601 was observed lying in bed. R601 was asked about their pain medications. R601 explained the facility runs out of their Morphine and they have to go a couple days without it. Review of the clinical record revealed R601 was admitted into the facility on 3/14/24 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: primary generalized osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain syndrome. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R601 had moderately impaired cognition. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This Citation Pertains to Intake #: MI00145908 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store tracheostomy supplies in a clean and sanitary condition for one (R903) of one Resident reviewed for infection control resulting in the potential to cause an infection(s) for a compromised resident with multiple comorbidities. Findings include: A record review revealed R903 was a long-term resident of the facility. R903's diagnoses included intracranial hemorrhage (brain bleed), seizures, and respiratory distress. R903 was breathing through tracheostomy (a surgical opening created into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck to assist with breathing). R903 was receiving their nutrition and hydration through Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG - A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is a feeding tube surgically placed through abdomen into the stomach) tube. R903 needed staff assistance for most of their Activities of daily Living (ADLs) such as mobility, toileting, dressing etc. R903 had family member appointed as their guardian. On 8/13/24 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake #MI00145455. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a portable oxygen tank was properly secured while left unattended resulting in the potential for the tank to be knocked over, causing a potential rocketing of the cylinder and injury to all residents in the immediate area, of a total census of 86. Findings include: On 7/23/24 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed and indicated that the facility was unsafe for residents. On 7/23/24 at approximately 8:59 a.m., A free-standing portable oxygen tank half full of oxygen was observed leaning up on it's side against a wall and was unsecured/unattended by any staff in the front Nursing Station that was located next to the dining room and a resident area hallway. At that time, multiple residents were observed in the dining room and hallway. On 7/23/24 At approximately 9:01 a.m., Nurse A was shown the unsecured oxygen tank leaning against the wall and was queried if that was a safe way to store oxygen tanks. Nurse A reported that it should not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared served, and stored in a sanitary manner for one resident (R32) of one resident reviewed for food storage. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/6/24 between 8:45 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: Dietary Staff L was observed with a long beard, but was not wearing beard restraint. Dietary Manager K confirmed Staff L should have on a beard restraint. According to the FDA Food Code section 2-402.11 Effectiveness, (A) Except as provided in (B) of this section, food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles. There were 3 ceiling vent covers observed with dust and peeling paint on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment in a dignified manner for seven residents (R#s 5, 42, 66, 13, 7, 55, and 289) of seven residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 11/2017 was reviewed and read, .The right to be treated with respect and dignity . On 5/6/24 at 10:00 AM, an interview was being conducted with R5 in their room with the door closed. During the interview, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 'B' entered the room without knocking or asking permission to enter. At approximately 10:05 AM, observations from the hallway revealed CNA 'B' entering R42 and R66's room retrieving breakfast trays. CNA 'B' was not observed to knock on the door and ask permission for entry. Upon exiting the room CNA 'B' was then observed to enter several other rooms on the hallway collecting breakfast trays without knocking or asking permission for entry to the rooms. On 5/6/24 at 10:10 AM, an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake#MI00144094. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were provided to meet resident needs for three residents (R58) and two other residents (who preferred to remain anonymous), potentially affecting all 87 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 5/6/24 a review of the payroll based journal report (PBJ-A total of Nursing hours worked reported by the facility to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) was conducted and revealed the facility had excessively low weekend staffing hours during FY (fiscal year) Quarter one (October through December 2023). On 5/7/24 at 10:30 a.m., during the anonymous group meeting, two residents indicated the facility was short staffed, they had to wait a long time for call light responses on the weekend shifts, and the (meal) tray pass was slow due to not enough Nursing aides to help pass the trays timely. One resident indicated that there were times when only one Nursing aide is passing trays at a time which resulted in cold food being served. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three insulin pens were stored in the appropriate place and two of four medication carts observed unlocked. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at approximately 4:17 p.m., a nursing treatment/medication cart located on the Oakland hallway containing various wound care treatments/creams was observed unlocked and unattended by any nursing staff. On 5/7/24 at 8:39 AM after Nurse O finished with a medication pass, an inspection of the cart on Oakland was made, there were three unopened insulin pens in the top drawer. Nurse O was asked where should unopened insulin be located and stated that it should be in the refrigerator. On 5/7/24 at approximately 10 AM, a medication cart located on the [NAME] unit was observed unlocked and unattended. On 5/7/24 at approximately 1PM, a medication cart located on the Oakland unit was observed unlocked and unattended. On 5/8/24 at 11:00 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and asked should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 5/6/24 at 12:20 PM, residents were observed in the dining room, being served soup from a soup kettle. The internal temperature of the soup inside the kettle was measured to be 117 degrees Fahrenheit. On 5/6/24 at 12:25 PM, when queried, Dietary Manager K looked at the kettle and stated the temperature dial needed to be adjusted to a higher temperature. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.16 Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food), Hot and Cold Holding. 1. (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under §3-501.19, and except as specified under (B) and in (C ) of this section, POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOOD (TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD) shall be maintained: 1. (1) At 57 ºC (135ºF) or above . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure palatable meals for six residents (R#'s 66, 70, 9, 65, 35, and 10) of twelve residents reviewed for food palatability, and failed to serve food at a palatable temperature, resulting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences for seven residents (R#'s 66, 35, 70, 41, 68, and 65) of 12 residents reviewed for food preferences, resulting in verbalized complaints and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 9:51 AM, R66 was asked about the food in the facility. They said they were never served coffee. Their breakfast tray was observed and did not contain coffee. A review of R66's meal ticket revealed a liked food/drink item was coffee. On 5/6/24 at 10:45 AM, R65 was interviewed about the food and said it was, awful. They said they frequently requested items from the always available menu but they were rarely provided what they asked for. On 5/6/24 at 1:08 PM, R66 was asked about their lunch meal and said It tastes like chicken. It was noted the ticket did not contain the menu items served to R66. R66 said the ticket never listed their food items and they were never provided with a menu. R66 said they would like a hamburger every once and awhile. They further verbalized their frustration about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE) for resident's on EBP for four residents, (R#'s 64, 45, 49, and 33) of seven residents reviewed for transmission based precautions, resulting in the potential for the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 10:18 AM, R64 and R45 were observed in their beds. They were each observed with a urinary catheter. There was no signage on the door that indicated the residents were treated with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), as defined by the Center For Disease Control, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate a transfer to the hospital per the resident's choice for one resident, (R35) of two residents reviewed for choices, resulting in R35 feeling the facility did not take their health condition seriously. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 11:05 AM, an interview was conducted with R35. R35 said an incident occurred in March (2024) where they were not feeling well and requested to go to the emergency room. R35 said they were pretty sure they had pneumonia and needed antibiotics. They further indicated staff told them they didn't need to go out and a transfer was not coordinated per their request. R35 reported they called 911 themselves and went to the emergency room where they were diagnosed with pneumonia and received intravenous (IV) antibiotics. R35's clinical record was reviewed and revealed they originally admitted to the facility 11/23/22, and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: multiple sclerosis, paraplegia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure correct and completed involuntary discharge transfer documents for one resident of one resident reviewed for discharge. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 10:48AM, R58 was observed in their room watching television. R58 was interviewed about the care received while in the facility. R58 stated that the facility was involuntarily discharging them due to a small bottle of unopened whiskey they found in the resident's nightstand. R58 was then asked how many times were they warned or educated on the matter of having alcohol in the facility. R58 stated this was the second time they were caught with an unopened bottle. R58 stated that they were allowed to go on leave of absences(LOA). R58 stated that the facility told them that they had a month to find new living arrangements. A record review revealed that R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure and acquired absence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure X-rays were ordered in a timely manner after a fall for one resident (R32) of one resident reviewed for diagnostic testing. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 1:16 PM, R32 was observed in their room in their wheelchair. They were asked about their stay in the facility and said they had a fall last night. They said they hurt their left arm and their left leg. An observation of their right arm revealed it was slightly reddened in comparison to their left. On 5/6/24 at 1:44 PM, a review of a progress notes entered into the record by Nurse 'H' revealed the following: 5/6/24 6:35 AM, .Upon Morning medication pass resident is found behind door on floor next to W/C (wheelchair) on L (left) side of body in fetal position. Resident is alert and inquiring who moved her Blankets and pillow .Resident c/o (complains of) pain in LUE (Left Upper Extremity) w/ (with) 10/10 pain & LLE (Left Lower Extremity) w/ 9/10 pain . 5/6/2024 at 7:23 AM, .On call per (Doctor's Name) Group paged r/t (related to) office closed .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate vision care was provided for one resident (R21) of one resident reviewed for vision/hearing. Findings include: On 5/06/24 at approximately 11:08 a.m., R21 was observed up in their wheelchair in the dining room. R21 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their care and they reported they had difficulty with their vision and the facility was not helping them with it. On 5/7/24 at approximately 3:19 p.m., R21 was observed in their room, sitting up in their bed. R21 was asked if they were able to see other objects and they indicated they can only see straight but nothing on the sides (peripheral vision), they again reported they felt the facility has not helped them with their vision. On 5/6/24 the medical record for R21 was reviewed and revealed the following: R21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and Legal blindness. A review of R21's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician's orders were followed for oxygen therapy administration for two residents (R58 and R63) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at approximately 1:01 p.m., R63 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R63 was observe to have oxygen delivered via nasal cannula at 1.5 liters per minute (LPM). R63 was queried if they knew how many liters per minute of oxygen they should be on and they reported it should be at three liters. On 5/6/24 at approximately 3:58 p.m., R63 was observed in their room, laying in their bed with oxygen still being delivered via nasal cannula at 1.5 LPM. On 5/6/24 the medical record for R63 was reviewed and revealed the following: R63 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary collapse. A review of R63's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management services for two of two residents (Resident 84 and 290 ) reviewed for pain, resulting in unrelieved pain. Findings include: R209 On 5/6/24 at 9:18AM, R290 was observed laying on their back watching television. R290 was asked how their care was at the facility. R290 stated it was okay and explained that have only been here for a couple of days because they broke their arm. R290 further explained that they were in a lot of pain and the facility took their walker and now had to hold the side of the wall to walk down the hallway. R290 was asked what they received for pain stated, Nothing, in the hospital I was getting morphine and oxycodone, then I got here and I don't even get an aspirin. A record review revealed that R290 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle weakness. A further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent when three medication errors were observed and one medication not signed out from a total of 25 opportunities observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. Findings include: On 5/7/23 at 08:39 AM Nurse O was observed during a medication administration pass for R42. Nurse O properly pulled and administered medication to resident and when exited the room, nurse O signed out the medications. Nurse O was asked if R42 received everything that they were supposed to for this medication pass. Nurse O stated, Yes. A record review of the physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that upon reconciliation Nurse O had not administered Fenofibrate 54mg, Loratadine and Sertraline 25mg, and did not sign out the as needed Tylenol that was administered. On 5/7/24 at 11:40 AM Nurse O was interviewed and asked why didn't they administer all due medications. Nurse O replied, I did administer everything…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pertinent resident information was documented in the medical record for one resident (R24) of one resident reviewed for Social Services/Guardianship resulting in the potential for clinical misrepresentation of the resident and errors in providing a continuum of care. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at approximately 9:50 a.m., R24 was observed to be confused and unable to answer any questions. On 5/6/24 the medical record for R24 was reviewed and revealed the following: R24 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: Adult failure to thrive, Dementia and Cerebral Infarction (stroke). A review of R24's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/25/24 revealed R24 had a BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) of one indicating severely impaired cognition. Further review of the medical record revealed R24 did not have a legal representative to assist with informed decision making. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00138031, MI00138863, MI00140340, and MI00141846. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document administration of schedule II (2) controlled substances (drugs that have high potential for abuse and/or addiction) according to professional standards of practice for nine (R502, R504, R509, R511, R512, R513, R514, R515, and R516) of 12 residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: On 4/3/24 at 1:03 PM, an observation of the Oak Unit medication cart was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'B' and the following observations were made: R509 LPN 'B' was asked to present R509's Morphine Sulfate Solution (a controlled liquid medication used to treat pain). The amount of medication in the bottle was compared with the amount documented on R509's Medication Monitoring/Control Record (a form used to document medication removed from the supply in order to keep an accurate record of the medication). The amount of medication in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice #1 This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00138031, MI00138863, MI00140340, and MI00141846. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure schedule II (2) controlled substances (drugs that have high potential for abuse and/or addiction) were accurately reconciled, administered, and documented; and discrepancies in counts were addressed for eight (R502, R509, R511, R512, R513, R514, R515, and R516) of 12 residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Survey Agency revealed an allegation that staff were not administering medications (controlled substances) according to physician's orders and proper procedures. On 4/3/24 at 1:03 PM, an observation of the Oak Unit medication cart was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'B' and the following observations were made: R509 LPN 'B' was asked to present R509's Morphine Sulfate Solution (a controlled liquid medication used to treat pain). The amount…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly report abnormal x-ray results to the physician/physician extender for one (R501) of four residents reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged on 10/13/23 the complainant observed R501's arm was swollen, and they were having difficulty breathing. The complainant further noted that the facility was not paying attention to the residents change in condition, so they requested that R501 be sent to the Hospital. A review of R501's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and their last admission date was 2/13/24 with diagnoses that included, in part: diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity and heart failure. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15/15 (intact cognition) and noted the resident needed one-to-two-person assistance for most Activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,030 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $36,030 — penalty dated 2024-04-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-17 for 32 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2023
AARON FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST31%since 07/01/2023
AB INVESTMENT TRUST U/A/D 01/03/23Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 07/01/2023
TODD A STERN 2015 IRRV INS TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 07/01/2023
BAUMOL, YEHOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL27%since 07/01/2023
GRAF, MARCELLAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
KROLL, GABRIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
NAGEL, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
AARON, JONATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
BURMEISTER, AMBERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2019
SINGERMAN, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
STERN, TODDIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 3%Other / private 20%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,218per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235396. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next