No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ambassador, A Villa Center

8045 E Jefferson Ave, Detroit, MI 48214 · For profit - Partnership · 176 certified beds · (313) 821-3525 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (313) 821-3525 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20231 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7633 Jefferson Ave E · (313) 824-8941 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8415 Jefferson Ave E · (313) 331-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8415 E Jefferson Ave · (313) 824-5100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8109 Jefferson Ave E · (313) 822-2867 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8115 E Jefferson Ave · (313) 821-1055

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.4%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.6%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.8%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.3%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%5.1%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.1%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine38.2%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.4%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%11.7%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.0%CMS range 35.5–67.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.9–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.0–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.26
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
43.2%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 165.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate safety measures to ensure resident safety for one resident (R40) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in R40 falling with fractures during staff assisted shower and increased likelihood for accidents and/or injuries. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet and Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R40 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia without behavior disturbances, and depression. The MDS reflected R40 had a BIM (Brief Interview for Mental status) score of 4 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired, and she required one-person physical assist bed mobility, transfers, walk in room and corridor, locomotion on unit, toileting, hygiene, and bathing and no mention on behaviors. Continued review of R40 MDS reflected a significant change MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3018700. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident representative for one resident (R502) of three reviewed for notification of changes.Findings include:Review of a complaint, dated 5/19/26, revealed R502's family members (including Family Member X) were not notified of R502's transfer to the hospital. The complaint also noted that family members were instructed to call around to various hospitals to locate R502.A review of R502's electronic health record (EHR) was conducted on 6/16/2026 and revealed R502 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes, cirrhosis of liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnea, obesity, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and chronic heart failure. Section C of the Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/1/2026 indicated R502 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status questionnaire, indicative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Properly store food items; 2. Remove undated, unlabeled food from the kitchen walk-in cooler and the reach in freezer; 3. Adequately clean kitchen surfaces. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen, resulting in an increased potential for foodborne illness.Findings include:On 1/6/2025 beginning at 8:45 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Kitchen Manager (KM) A. During the tour, the following items were observed:-in the walk-in cooler a prepared pan of rice and a prepared pan of gravy were stored on the bottom shelf directly next to raw ground meat. KM A said prepared food should not be stored next to raw food. -an undated, unlabeled container full of approximately two dozen packages of lunch meat. KM A said the container contained bologna and should be labelled and dated.-In the reach in freezer an undated, unlabeled bag of frozen turkey legs and an open bag of breaded tilapia. KM A stated, They are freezer burned, they should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly secure protected health information for one resident (R28) of 30 residents reviewed for privacy, resulting in the potential for unauthorized disclosure and access. Findings include: On 01/07/2026 at 12:50 PM, observations revealed R28's personal information face up on a medication cart on the 1 (one) north hallway. R28's personal information was available for anyone to see walking through the hallway. The hallway had staff, residents, and visitors walking down the hallway. The personal information pertained to resident R28 being readmitted to the facility. The admission notification sheet listed the R28's diagnosis as well as other personal information. 01/07/2026 12:55 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F approached the medication cart. LPN F was queried and if that was their medication cart. LPN F said that was their medication cart. LPN F acknowledged seeing R28's admitting information face up on the medication cart. LPN F said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations for three residents (R9, R128 and R7) of five residents reviewed with compromised health conditions resulting in the potential for infection and a decrease in health status.Findings include: On 01/08/2026 at 9:00 AM, Infection Preventionist (IP) B was interviewed, and vaccine consents and administration forms were reviewed. Three of five residents reviewed had signed consents, however, there was no record of immunizations being administered to R7, R9 and R128. There was also no evidence that R7, R9 and R128 had refused these immunizations or that they were contraindicative. A record review revealed signed consents dated 10/13/25 for R7 and R9 to receive Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations. A record review revealed a signed consent dated 10/21/25 for R128 to receive Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations. As of 1/08/2026 there was no evidence of influenza and pneumococcal immunizations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Covid-19 vaccinations for three residents (R7, R9 and R128) of five residents reviewed for vaccination administration. Findings include:On 01/08/2026 at 9:00 AM, immunization consents were reviewed with Infection Preventionist (IP) B. Record review for R7 and R9 revealed a signed consent dated 10/13/25 for the Covid-19 vaccination. However, there was no record of this immunization being administered to R7 and R9. There was no evidence that R7 and R9 refused the Covid-19 immunization. Record review revealed a consent signed by R128, dated 10/21/25, for the Covid-19 vaccination. However, there was no record of this immunization being administered to R128. On 01/08/2026 at 9:20 AM, IP B was asked to provide a reason why immunizations were not provided upon consent. IP B explained they were new in the position, unfamiliar with the vaccine clinic protocol, and had not realized the amount of time required to administer immunizations to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00151504. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R905) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse was reported to the State Agency, resulting in the potential for further injury of unknown origin or abuse to go unreported and not investigated. Findings include On 6/9/25 at 3:00 P.M. R905 was observed sleeping in a low bed with a fall mat placed on the right side. On 6/10/25 at 8:30 A.M. during a meal observation R905 was observed in a low bed with bilateral fall mats on both sides of the bed. The resident appeared alert but responded to questions in short, simple words. During the interview a dark faded area was observed on the resident's left cheek area. On 6/10/25 at 1:50 P.M. review of the admission Record revealed R905 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00151504 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was investigated for one (R905) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for abuse to occur. Findings include: On 6/9/25 at 3:00 P.M., R905 was observed sleeping in a low bed with a fall mat placed on the right side. On 6/10/25 at 8:30 A.M. during a meal observation R905 was observed in a low bed with bilateral fall mats on both sides of the bed. The resident appeared alert but responded to questions in short, simple words. During the interview a dark faded area was observed on the resident's left cheek area. On 6/10/25 at 1:50 P.M. review of the admission Record revealed R905 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infraction due to occlusion stenosis of cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented during wound care for two residents (R911 and R912) out of two residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R912 Review of R912's electronic medical records (EMR) revealed resident was diagnosed with a stage 3 pressure ulcer (injury to skin from prolonged pressure) located on the sacrum (upper area of buttocks). On 6/9/25 at 12:00 PM, a wound care observation was conducted in R912's room. A sign was posted on the door indicating the requirement for enhanced barrier precautions. Additionally, a door - mounted storage unit containing gloves, gowns and masks were observed. The three staff members -Registered Nurse (RN) A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, and LPN C entered the room and participated in this high contact wound care without donning (applying) gowns prior to initiating the procedure. Further review of R912's EMR revealed an admission date of 12/24/24, with a pertinent diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral (sacrum) area.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post and plan alternate meals and All Time Available food choices, resulting in numerous complaints of dissatisfaction with meal choices and food. This deficient practice affected 159 of 170 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: On 9/25/24 at 9:38 A.M. during an observation in the kitchen, the menu posted identified the following meal choices: Crusted Chicken, Buttered pasta, Buttered Carrots, Apple Crumble, Beverage. There were no alternates written on the menu or posted. On 9/25/24 at 1:40 P.M. on the 2 south and 2 north Units during a lunch meal observation, no alternate meal selection was posted. The menu board had one meal (Today's Meal) posted and there was no other food items or choices for the residents. During the observation resident's H, J, K and L (who wanted to remain anonymous) were observed requesting nursing staff for alternates. Each of these residents were identified as being cognitively intact. On 9/26/24 at 12:35 P.M., during an observation on the tray line Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the physical plant and steam table wells used in the kitchen, affecting 159 of the 170 residents who consume food from the kitchen, resulting in the potential for cross contamination, bacterial harbage and staff injury. Findings include: On 9/25/24 at 9:38 A.M. during an observation of the kitchen the grease trap drain was observed overflowing with water from the three-compartment sink. Dietary Manager G indicated the grease drain had been cleaned out a couple of weeks ago but was now draining slow again. On 9/26/24 at 12:35 P.M., the grease trap drain overflowed during an observation of the lunch service. Employees on the tray line was observed standing,and sliding through standing water, attempting to complete the lunch service. During this observation two rubber tubs used to maintain food temperatures on the trayline leaked water between two tables running into the pathway under the tray line. During each of the above observations the wells on the steam table were observed with pieces of old food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity for one resident (R110) of three residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in verbalized feelings of embarrassment and frustration. Findings included: On 9/25/24 at 11:47 a.m. R110 reported that the physician placed an order at least two months ago to be seen by a podiatrist to get the residents toenails cut and for the dry skin and it has not happened. R110 stated, I want my long thick toenails to be cut on both feet because I don't want anyone to see my toenails like that. Its embarrassing and that is why I got very angry. R110 pointed to their feet and the great toe and the second toe on the left foot were observed with dry scaly skin on top of the toes and between the toes with dark areas and long thick toenails with an unpleasant odor. The right foot also had long, thick, discolored toenails and dry skin between the toes. The fifth toenail on the right foot appeared to have been broken and exposed thick dried skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening (PAS)/ Annual Resident Review (ARR) form for Mental Illness/ Intellectual Disability/ Related Conditions Identification (DCH-3877) document was accurate, complete, and sent to the local state agency for an evaluation for a Level II determination for one (R57) of seven residents reviewed for PASSARs, resulting in the potential for unmet intellectual/ developmental disability care needs. Findings include: R57: According to the Electronic Health Record (EHR), R57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Adjustment Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, and Depression. R57 was prescribed two antipsychotic medications; Cymbalta (an anti-depressant) 30 milligrams (mg) twice a day and Olanzapine (an anti-psychotic) 2.5 mg twice a day (used to treat schizophrenia). On 8/24/24 a care plan was initiated for 'use of psychiatric medications'. A review of the only DCH-3877 form in the resident's EHR was dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure podiatry services and treatment were provided in a timely manner for one resident (R110) of one resident reviewed for foot care, resulting in the growth of long toenails, build-up of flaky skin on resident's feet, and delay in needed treatment. Findings include: On 9/25/24 at 11:47 a.m. R110 was observed resting in bed. During the resident interview, the resident complained of needing to be seen by the podiatrist due to long thick toenails. R110 pointed to both feet and said, The physician placed an order for a podiatrist appointment at least two months ago to get the toenails cut and for the dry skin and it has not happened. I don't know if they put my name on the list or not, but I have been mentioning it for about two months. R110's great toe and the second toe on the left foot had dry scaly skin on top of the toes and between the toes with dark areas and long thick toenails. The right foot also had long, thick, discolored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one resident (R70) of two residents reviewed resulting in the delay of obtaining a legal guardian to initiate discharge planning in a timely manner and the resident expressing frustration. Findings include: On 9/27/24 at 10:00 AM, R70 was observed sitting on the side of the bed. R70 was queried about any concerns regarding the care by the facility, R70 responded, I want to be discharged , I don't want to be here. Review of R70's electronic health record (EHR) revealed admission into the facility on 3/12/20 with a pertinent diagnosis of vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R70 scored 8 out of 15 on Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed resident did not have a guardian. Review of Report of Physician or Mental Health Professional dated and signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    In a confidential resident group interview on 8/16/23 at 11:29 AM, 10 of 10 residents reported the lunch and dinner meals was not palatable. Several residents stated that they feel that have to order out to get a decent meal. 10 of 10 residents reported that the portion sized of the meal is small, comparing the portion to kid sized meals. 9 of 10 residents reported that the pork is too tough to cut or chew. 10 of 10 residents reported that the food is not warm and have observed the staff leaving the meal cart doors open and conversating instead of passing trays. In an interview on 08/17/23 at 10:24 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) reported that the residents have had some food committee meetings to discuss food concerns but has cancelled the past few monthly meetings. DM reported that he is aware of food concerns and had been speaking to a few select residents monthly regarding food concerns and possible resolutions. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure palatable food temperatures and food texture, resulting in poor satisfactory of meals by residents, affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the physical facility, maintain plumbing in good repair, and maintain equipment, resulting in the potential for contamination of the physical facility and food product, affecting all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Finding include: On 8/16/23 at 11:04 AM, the floor underneath the dish machine drain board was observed to have dissolved floor tile grout. Two tiles were observed to be loose at this time. Additionally, the waste disposal flex cuff, in the dish washing area, was observed to be leaking slightly. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 6-201.11 Floors, Walls, and Ceilings. Except as specified under § 6-201.14 and except for antislip floor coverings or applications that may be used for safety reasons, floors, floor coverings, walls, wall coverings, and ceilings shall be designed, constructed, and installed so they are SMOOTH and EASILY CLEANABLE. On 8/16/23 at 11:15 AM, the two-compartment sink drain line was observed to be leaking on to the floor. Additionally in the back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in good repair, maintain clean ventilation, and maintain backflow protection, resulting in a non-homelike facility and potential for contamination of the domestic water supply, affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include: During an environmental inspection on 8/16/23 between 12:16 PM and 2:03 PM, the following observations were made: -Two ceiling tiles, in the hall near room [ROOM NUMBER], were observed to be stained with water damage. -The shower room, near room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed to have gum or [NAME] adhesive on the floor; the ceiling in the shower enclosure was observed to have bubbling paint. -The ventilation screen, in boiler room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed to have fallen out of the vent frame, allowing for potential pests to enter the premise. -The PTAC (packaged terminal air unit) filter, located in room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed to be caked with dust. -The walls, located in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00133207 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 34 residents (including Resident #40 and 115) on the third floor, reviewed for physical environment. The facility also failed to maintain a clean comfortable home like environment in the dining room on the third floor that had the likelihood to impact all residents who were using the dining room for their meals and other activities. Findings include: During an observation on 8/15/23 at 10:53 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had no window curtains, two beds with matching comforters, rough unfinished dry wall by bathroom, soiled(dark mater splashed) wall behind toilet, discolored broken grout around toilet, toilet paper holder very loose with broken dry wall. During an observation on 8/15/23 at 11:04 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had two beds and the bed located closest to the door did not have the privacy curtain in place and the track was broken and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bed hold policy was provided to three (Resident #27, #125, and #207) of three residents reviewed for hospital transfer, resulting in the potential for resident's and/or representatives to be uninformed of the facility's bed hold policy. Findings include: Resident #125 Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #125 (R125) was readmitted to facility 8/7/23 with diagnoses including acute encephalitis, muscle weakness, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/23 reflected that R125 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Review of the Discharge MDS dated [DATE] reflected that R125 had an unplanned discharge to an acute care hospital and that his return to the facility was anticipated. In an observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 2:24 PM, R125 was observed lying in bed, on back, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident # 91 (R91) was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage due to a motor vehicle accident, diabetes, and bi-polar disorder. R91 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 08/15/23 at 2:40pm, R91 was observed resting in bed, upon approach R91 initiated a conversation using American Sign Language (ASL) this surveyor is knowledgeable of alphabet and some basic ASL commonly used words. R91 reported he had no hearing ability, and did not use a hearing aid, when queried how he communicated with staff he reported by writing and pointed to his tablet and using gestures. Review of R91's Minimum Data Set (MDS)'s with the assessment reference dates of 1/29/23, 05/01/23 and 08/01/23 section B question 0200 were consistently coded as 1 meaning R91 had minimal hearing loss. The 1/29/23 MDS further reflected R91…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation of the 1 South medication care on 08/17/2023 at 11:22 a.m. it was observed that the following medications did not have a date when the medication was open placed on the container of th medication: Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol discus 500 micrograms (mcg)/50 mcg and Lansoprazole 3 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml). In an interview on 08/17/2023 at 11;22 a.m. during 1 South medication care observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T explained that all medication is to be dated when opened. She explained that she would discard the medication that was not dated, as listed above, and order new medication. During observation of the 2 South back medication cart on 08/17/2023 at 11:48 a.m. it was observed that the following medications did not have a date when the medication was open placed on the container of the medication: Fluticasone Furoate 100mcg-vilaterol 25mcg/dose inhaler. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication stored in three of five medication carts were dated after opening and discarded at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) adhere to infection control practices during medication administration observation; and 2) maintain clean and sanitized environment including resident equipment and common areas, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination, spread of bacteria, and increased risk of infection. Findings include: During an observation on 8/15/23 at 10:53 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had no window curtains, two beds with matching comforters, rough unfinished dry wall by bathroom, soiled(dark mater splashed) wall behind toilet, discolored broken grout around toilet, toilet paper holder very loose with broken dry wall. During an observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 11:11 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had bathroom wall appeared soiled with dark splash stains behind the toilet. During an observation on 8/15/23 at 2:41 PM, the west(left) wall of the third floor dining room Air Conditioning (AC) units were not on and appeared heavily soiled with dark substance that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00133896. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity for 2 residents (R#'s, 114 and 115) with a facility census of 154, resulting in the potential for embarrassment and decreased feelings of self worth. Findings include: During an observation on 8/16/23 at 12:50 PM, the first meal tray was delivered to the third floor dining room. During an observation on 8/16/23 at 12:55 PM, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) GG told another staff member R115 was a, feeder, in front of 20 other residents in the dining room. All 20 residents in the dining room were served meals on trays and ate from trays the entire meal. During an observation on 8/16/23 at 1:08 PM, staff delivered last tray to a resident who was in the dining room at 12:45 p.m. after most all other residents in had finished eating including at the same table. Resident #114 Review of Resident #114's (R114) medical record reflected they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00133473 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide written or spoken notice of a room change for one resident (#359) of one resident reviewed for room change, resulting in the potential for resident anxiety, misinformation of the reason for the room move, and lack of opportunity for resident questions. Findings Included: Resident #359 (R359) Review of the medical record revealed R359 was admitted to the facility 11/10/2022 with diagnoses that included chronic embolism and thrombosis (blood clots), anxiety, depression, adjustment disorder, paraplegia (paralysis of the lower body) , mood disorder, protein calorie malnutrition, alcohol abuse, blindness in right eye, epilepsy (disorder with nerve cell activity is disrupted in brain causing seizures), cerebral infarction (stroke), traumatic brain injury, right sided hemiparesis and hemiplegia (one sided paralysis or weakness) , polyarthritis, and anemia (low red blood cells). Resident was discharged from the facility 03/23/2023. During review of R359's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility facility to ensure one out of two residents (Resident #5) had an accurate Advanced Directive form, resulting in the potential for resident wishes to not be followed. Findings Included: Review of the facility's Advanced Directive (AD) form titled, Code Status Elective Form revealed the form had options to check if a resident wished to be Full Resuscitation-(Full Code (life saving efforts to be given), or Do Not Resuscitate-(No Code) . (no life saving efforts to be given). A check mark was in the box next to Full Resuscitation-(Full Code), and also the word Full was circled which, per the form, indicated Resident #5 (R5) wished to have all medically appropriate care provided. On the signature line for Resident/Responsible Party the form revealed Verbal Consent dated 12/9/2022, but there was no name of the person who gave verbal consent. The form also revealed that two witness' were to sign the form, however there was only one witness' signature dated 12/9/2022. In an interview on 8/16/2023 at 3:37 PM, Social Worker (SW) E stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00138470 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the family member/emergency contact of a change in condition and a required hospital transfer for one resident (#356) of two residents reviewed resulting in the family/emergency contact not being aware of a change in condition and the transfer to the hospital. Findings Included: Resident #356 (R356) Review of the medical record revealed R356 was admitted to the facility 02/10/2023 with diagnoses that included fracture of the left femur, type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, hearing loss, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/17/2023, revealed R356 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 (mildly impaired cognition) out of 15. R356 was discharged to the hospital 07/01/2023. In a telephone interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00137118 and MI00135021 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect two residents (#357, #358) right to be free from abuse of five residents reviewed resulting in the potential of physical harm to the residents. Findings Included: Resident #357 (R357) Review of the medical record revealed R357 was admitted to the facility 11/11/2021 with diagnoses that included right hip osteoarthritis, left sided hemiplegia (paralysis), hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), dissociative and conversion disorder (mental health condition causes a person to become disconnected form important aspects of their lives and can mimic neurological conditions), nutritional deficiency, muscle weakness, psychomotor deficit (disturbance in psychological control of movement), and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/23/2023, revealed R357 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. R357 was discharged from the facility 06/15/2023. Review R357 medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00135021 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse (physical abuse) for two residents (#358, #360) of five residents sampled resulting in allegations of abuse not being reported to the State Agency and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported and not thoroughly investigated. Findings Included: Resident #358 (R358) Review of the medical record revealed R358 was admitted to the facility 01/31/2023 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the prostate, obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract), hyperlipemia (high fat in blood), protein calorie malnutrition, hypokalemia (low potassium) hypomagnesemia (low magnesium), altered mental status, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/03/2023, revealed R358 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 (severely cognitively impaired) out of 15. R358 was discharged from the facility 03/02/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident's representative a written reason of transfer to a hospital for one (Resident #125) of three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, resulting in the potential of residents and/or family being un-informed of the reason for transfer. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #125 (R125) was readmitted to facility 8/7/23 with diagnoses including acute encephalitis, muscle weakness, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/23 reflected that R125 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Review of the Discharge MDS dated [DATE] reflected that R125 had an unplanned discharge to an acute care hospital and that his return to the facility was anticipated. In an observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 2:24 PM, R125 was observed lying in bed, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 (Resident #91) of 31 reviewed for MDS assessments, resulting in the potential for inaccurate care plans and unmet care needs. Findings include: According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident # 91 (R91) was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage due to a motor vehicle accident, diabetes, and bi-polar disorder. R91 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 08/15/23 at 2:40pm, R91 was observed resting in bed, upon approach R91 initiated a conversation using American Sign Language (ASL) this surveyor knowledgeable of alphabet and some basic ASL commonly used words. R91 reported he had no hearing ability, and did not use a hearing aid, when queried how he communicated with staff he reported by writing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission/Annual Resident Review (PAS/ARR) was completed after the 30 day exemption period and failed to notify the State Agency Health Authority for 1 Residents ( #107) and failed complete the 3878 portion of the PAS/ARR for 1 Resident (60) of 4 residents reviewed for PAS/ARR from a total sample of 31, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health treatment and services. Findings include; Resident #107 According to the clinical record Resident 107 (R107) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, bi-polar disorder and substance abuse. On 8/15/23 at approximately 10:00 am, R107 was observed resting in bed difficult to engage in conversation. Review of the PAS/ARR dated 9/20/22 reflected R107 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and received anti depressant and antipsychotic medications, further review of the 3877 and 3878 reflected R107 was expected to be discharged back into the community within 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00136732 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bath/showers and continence care for one Resident (#208) of 5 Residents reviewed, resulting in missed showers and the potential for inadequate hygiene and feelings of embarrassment. Resident #208 (R208) Review of the medical record revealed R208 was admitted to the facility 05/03/2023 with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), congestive heart failure (CHF), major depression, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), hypertension, morbid obesity, fractur of right femur, atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux, anemia (low red blood cells), osteoarthritis, and muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/08/2023, revealed R208 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 (moderately impaired cognition) out of 15. R208's MDS-Section G (Functional Status), with the same ARD, revealed that she required extensive assistance with toileting and was totally dependent for showering/bathing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance to ensure ancillary services were arranged for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #141 and 3) reviewed for optical care, and audiology care, resulting in delayed care and treatment and frustration. Findings include: Resident #141 According to the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] , Resident # 141 (R141) was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included chronic kidney disease, hypertension and unspecified bilateral hearing loss. Further review of the MDS reflected R141 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), section B of the MDS reflected R141 had moderate hearing loss and no hearing aid. On 08/15/23 at 12:46 PM, R141 was interviewed in her room, R141 noticeably struggled to hear questions, and elaborated that she had a hearing test in June and thought she was getting hearing aids but had not been updated or informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures to assure the accurate dispensing, administering, and documentation of controlled substances for two of five medication carts, resulting in the potential for controlled drug diversion. Findings Included: During observation of the 1 South medication cart on 08/17/2023 at 11:22 a.m. it was observed that the document entitled Controlled Substance Shift Inventory was not signed for 08/17/2023 at 07:00 a.m. by the oncoming nurse. The total number of medications at the end of the shift was also not completed. In an interview on 08/17/2023 at 11:25 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T explained that she was the oncoming nursing for the 1 South medication cart. She explained that it was the expectation that the outgoing nurse and the oncoming nurse would count the controlled medication at 07:00 a.m. and record the total numbers and sign their signature in the appropriate box, which was located on the document entitled Controlled Substance Shift Inventory. LPN T explained that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when 2 medication errors were observed from a total of 36 opportunities for one resident (R121) of four residents observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 5.56 percent (%). Findings include: During an observation on 8/17/23 at 9:35 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N administered R121's medications scheduled for 9:00 AM; LPN N did not administer Januvia (used to treat diabetes) 50 milligrams (mg) or Nifedipine extended release (ER, used to treat high blood pressure) 90 mg. In review of R121's physician orders and August 2023's medication administration record (MAR), there were two active orders for Nifedipine: 120 mg daily and 90 mg daily scheduled to be administered at 9:00 AM. Januvia 50 mg was scheduled to be administered at 9:00 AM. R121's August 2023's MAR revealed LPN N documented Nifedipine 90 mg, Nifedipine 120 mg, and Januvia 50 mg, were administered on 8/17/23 at 9:00 AM. During an interview on 8/17/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one of three residents reviewed for dental services (Resident #139), resulting in continued mouth pain and unmet needs. Findings Include: Resident #139 (R139) R139 was observed sitting on her bed on 8/15/23 at 1:00 PM and stated during an interview that she had oral pain, had cavities, and needed a crown. In review of R139's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener, score of 14 (13-15 Cognitively Intact); and required extensive assistance for personal hygiene (includes brushing teeth). The same MDS assessment indicated R139 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. During an interview on 08/16/23 at 12:55 PM, Social Worker E stated she was not aware R139 needed to see the dentist. During an interview with Social Services Director J on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two out of 31 one resident's (Resident #5 and 75) medical records were complete and accurate resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings Included: Resident #5 (R5): Review of the facility's Advanced Directive (AD) form titled, Code Status Elective Form revealed the form had options to check if a resident wished to be Full Resuscitation-(Full Code (life saving efforts to be given), or Do Not Resuscitate-(No Code) . (no life saving efforts to be given). A check mark was in the box next to Full Resuscitation-(Full Code), and also the word Full was circled which, per the form, indicated Resident #5 (R5) wished to have all medically appropriate care provided. On the signature line for Resident/Responsible Party the form revealed Verbal Consent dated 12/9/2022, but there was no name of the person who gave verbal consent. The form also revealed that two witness' were to sign the form, however there was only one witness' signature dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per Resident in multiple resident bedrooms and at least 100 square feet for single Resident bedrooms, affecting 32 Resident rooms (#'s 113, 115, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 135, 138, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221,223, 224, 225, 226,227, 228, 229 and 230). Findings include: Observation of the resident rooms on 1/7/2026 at 4:00 P.M, and review of the facility documentation revealed the following: Room# Sq. Footage # of Bed Residents 113 141' 1.5 2 2 115 141' 1.5 2 1 117 141' 1.5 2 2 119 141' 1.5 2 2 120 141' 1.5 2 2 121 141' 1.5 2 2 122 141' 1.5 2 2 123 141' 1 2 2 124 141' 1 2 1 125 141' 1 2 2 126 141' 1 2 0 127 141' 1.5 2 1 129 141' 1.5 2 2 130 141' 2 2 1 131 141' 1.5 2 2 132 141' 1.5 2 2 133 141' 1.5 2 1 135 141' 5 2 2 138 141' 1.5 2 1 213 150' 5 2 2 215 150' 6 2 2 215 150' 6 2 2 217 150' 6 2 2 219 150' 6 2 2 221 150' 6 2 2 223 150' 5.5 2 2 224 150' 6 2 2 225 150' 6 2 1 226 150' 6 2 2 227 150' 6 2 2 228 150' 5.5 2 2 229 150' 5.5 2 2 230…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms affecting 38 Resident rooms (#'s113, 115, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133,135, 138, 213, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, and 238). Findings include: Observation of the Resident rooms on 9/27/2024 at 2:00 P.M., and review of the Facility Bed Count Information sheet revealed the following: ROOM # SQ. FT # OF BEDS # of Residents 113 141' 1.5 2 2 115 141' 1.5 2 2 117 141' 1.5 2 2 119 141' 1.5 2 1 120 141' 1.5 2 2 121 141' 1.5 2 2 122 141' 1.5 2 2 123 141' 1 2 2 124 141' 1 2 2 125 141' 1 2 2 126 141' 1 2 2 127 141' 1.5 2 1 129 141' 1.5 2 2 130 141' 2 2 2 131 141' 1.5 2 2 132 141' 1.5 2 2 133 141' 1.5 2 2 135 141' 5 2 2 138 141' 1.5 2 2 213 150' 5 2 2 215 150' 6 2 2 217 150' 6 2 2 219 150' 6 2 2 221 150' 6 2 2 223 150' 5.5 2 2 224 150' 6 2 2 225 150' 6 2 2 226 2 2 227 150' 6 2 2 228 150' 5.5 2 2 229 150' 5.5 2 2 230 150' 5 2 2 Interviews conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.8+2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2023
AARON FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST31%since 07/01/2023
AB INVESTMENT TRUST U/A/D 01/03/23Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 07/01/2023
TODD A STERN 2015 IRRV INS TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 07/01/2023
BAUMOL, YEHOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL27%since 07/01/2023
KROLL, GABRIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
NAGEL, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2023
AARON, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/17/2025
CONERWAY, HENRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/03/2024
GRAF, MARCELLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/17/2025
SINGERMAN, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2026
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
STERN, TODDIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.1M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 3%Other / private 16%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,505per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235102. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next