The Villa at Green Lake Estates
6470 Alden Dr, Orchard Lake, MI 48324 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (248) 978-5906 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $434,664 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-04)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 82.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.2% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.0% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.3% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.6% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.9% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.7%CMS range 26.3–48.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 7.4–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.7–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 75.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly assess for safety, implement timely and effective interventions, and provide adequate supervision with a safe environment for one (R900) of four Residents reviewed for falls/accident hazards, who was identified as high fall risk (history of fall with injury), wanderer, with severe cognitive impairment resulting in multiple falls on the staircase or with the step of the staircase, and multiple facial fractures, a laceration requiring closure, loss of consciousness, hospitalization, and unnecessary pain (using the reasonable person concept). Findings include: This citation pertains to intake # 2626141.Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/8/25 at 10:00 AM.The IJ began on 9/17/25.The Administrator was notified of the IJ on 10/8/25 at 10:00 AM. A plan for removal was requested at that time to remove the immediacy.The IJ was removed on 10/8/25 based on the facility's implementation of an acceptable plan to remove the immediacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00141154. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H Immediately responded to a reported change of condition for R402 who was reported to the nurse as unresponsive, resulting in delayed follow up care, delayed initiation of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), delayed summoning of Emergency Medical Services and death, for one (R402) of one resident reviewed for CPR. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE], when LPN H failed to timely follow up on R402 who was reported as unresponsive. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:24 PM. The surveyor confirmed by interviews, and record reviews that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remains as isolated due to sustained compliance that has not been verified by the State Agency (SA). Review of a complaint submitted to the SA documented in part . There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R37 On 6/30/25 at 10:15 AM, R37 was observed lying in bed. R37 reported he was not feeling well at that moment and was going to the hospital. When queried about the care in the facility, R37 reported he wore a Life Vest (a wearable cardioverter defibrillator vest that continuously monitors for life-threatening irregular heart rhythms and automatically delivers shock treatment to save a person's life, if needed). R37 reported the vest was not removed because he was to wear it at all times. R37 reported the vest did not fit properly and was very tight which caused a big wound on the trunk of his body where the vest made contact with his skin. R37 reported the facility ordered a new vest, but he never received it. R37 reported the wound was painful and uncomfortable. An observation of the wound to R37's torso was not conducted as R37 left for the hospital shortly after the above interview and did not return prior to the end of the survey. A review of R37's clinical record revealed R37 was admitted into the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-12-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00147691, MI00147358 Based on observation, interviews and record review facility failed implement an effective discharge planning process for two (R901 and R902) of two residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, resulting in psychosocial harm using the reasonable person concept for R901 who has aphasia (difficulty communicating due to damage in the brain), a language barrier, and severe cognitive impairment, was discharged to another facility, farther away from family, without approval from the resident's representative and without notification to the other facility; and R902 feeling frustrated and dissatisfied with their living situation. Findings include: R901 A complaint received from another State Agency revealed the following: (R901's name omitted) family received a call from staff notifying them that (R901's name omitted) would be transferred to (facility name omitted). The staff stated (R901's name omitted) was being transferred because he wanders into other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00139836. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders were transcribed and implemented as ordered by the Physician Assistant, ensure abnormal laboratory results were reported to the physician, ensure an EKG and echocardiogram was completed as ordered by the physician, and ensure the appropriate mode of transportation services were activated to transport the resident to the hospital for one (R909) of one resident reviewed for a change of condition, which resulted in the delay of care including the administration of antibiotics, treatment and medical services and required the resident to be transferred and admitted to the hospital for a higher level of care. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R909 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 11/10/19 and diagnoses that included: rhabdomyolysis, quadriplegia, lack of coordination and anoxic brain damage. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely assess, monitor and follow physician orders for one R72 of one resident reviewed for hospitalization resulting in a decrease in R72's condition (sepsis) and hospitalization. Findings include: A review of R72's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: bipolar disorder, depression, dementia and atrial fibrillation. R72 was discharged to the hospital on 2/15/23. Review of R72's Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 (severely cognitively impaired) and required extensive one to two person assist for most activities of daily living. Continued review of R72's clinical record documented, in part, the following: 2/13/23 -Physician Progress Noted (authored by Physician Assistant (PA) H: .Patient seen recently due to weight loss and increased agitation .UA (urinalysis) C & S (culture and sensitivity) was ordered but has yet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2714636 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse/neglect for one resident (R906) of two residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment. Findings include:On 6/9/26 a concern submitted to the State Agency (SA) was reviewed which alleged R906 was neglected by facility staff on 1/7/26. On 6/9/26 the medical record for R906 was reviewed and revealed the following: R906 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Obesity and Heart failure. A review of R906's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/26 revealed R906 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R906's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was 14 indicating intact cognition. A review of R906's progress notes revealed the following: 1/7/2026 at 07:00 . pt (patient) was refusing care, using aggressive language towards staff, removing brief to urinate and defecate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3013247Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care for one resident (R913), of two residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include:Clinical record review revealed R913 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long term care with a medical history of prostate cancer, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and required a Suprapubic (SP) indwelling urinary catheter (surgically placed urinary catheter inserted directly through the abdomen). A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) conducted on 5/11/26 indicated R913 had moderate cognitive impairment.The State Agency received a concern that alleged the facility failed to provide appropriate and adequate catheter care according to the residents plan of care and physician orders. On 6/8/26 at 10:20 AM, Family Member F was contacted by phone confirming the allegations and said they would be at the facility after 1:00 PM to visit with R913.Clinical record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number: 2714799 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for an abdominal binder and implement effective interventions to prevent dislodgement of a feeding tube for one (R907) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in a hospital transfer to reinsert the feeding tube. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that R907 had multiple episodes of feeding tube dislodgement and the facility did not continue the use of an abdominal binder that was placed in the hospital. A review of R907's clinical record revealed R907 was admitted into the facility on 5/5/25, readmitted on [DATE], and discharged on 12/16/25 with diagnoses that included: vascular parkinsonism, hemiplegia, and aphasia. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R907 had severely impaired cognition, no behaviors, and received 51 percent or more of fluid and nutrition via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2615985 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services ordered by the physician/practitioner for one (R901) of two Residents reviewed for laboratory services. Findings include:A complaint received by the State Agency revealed that the facility failed to follow through with a laboratory (lab) order by the physician to rule out Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for R901 during their stay at the facility which was also confirmed during an interview with the complainant on 10/3/25 at approximately 11:15 AM.R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization due to left ankle fracture. R901's admitting diagnoses included intellectual disabilities, pneumonia, and anxiety disorder. R901 was living in a group home prior to hospitalization. R901 had a guardian who was their family member. R901 was transferred to the hospital on 8/24/25 after a fall at the facility.Review of R901's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to complaint: 2600725.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to follow the facility policy regarding the implementation of individualized interventions for skin protection for one (R105) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the lack of interventions implemented to prevent wounds in the facility. On 9/4/25 R105 was observed lying on their back in bed playing on their cellphone. An interview was conducted with the resident at that time. A review of the medical record for R105 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: paraplegia, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and contracture of lower leg. R105 required staff assistance for all activities of daily living. A nursing note dated 8/29/25 at 8:13 PM, documented the following wounds . 1. Left knee- stage three pressure, 2. L (left) knee medial-stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to complaint: 2600725. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and/or resident specific interventions to prevent falls for one (R103- a resident with a known history of falls with injury, developmental delay, non-compliance with care, impulsive & combativeness) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in injuries that required the resident to be transferred to the hospital for a higher level of care. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of frequent falls with injury due to the lack of staffing at the facility. A review of an audit of residents transferred to the hospital revealed a concern with R103. A review of the medical record revealed R103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: aftercare following joint replacement surgery, severe intellectual disabilities, developmental disorder of speech and language, unspecified lack of expected normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to properly date (Insulin) and appropriately store medications in one out of four medication carts resulting in the potential for harm due to unsafe medication administration and decreased efficiency. Findings include: During an observation completed on the 2-West medication cart on 7/1/25 at approximately 11:30 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M, an opened undated Humalog (Insulin) was located on the top drawer. When questioned, LPN M reported that it should have been dated. They confirmed that that the insulin pen was open and they were unsure why it was not dated. Further observation of the medication cart revealed five unidentifiable loose pills on the drawer. They were unsure how it happened and added that management was checking the medication carts weekly. They reported that they were a new nurse. During an interview with 2nd floor unit manager (UM) I on 7/2/25 at approximately 9:15 AM, the observations from 7/1/25 were shared. UM I reported that insulin should have been dated as soon as they were opened and staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure coordinated hospice service visits for one resident (R9), of one resident reviewed for end of life care, resulting in the potential for unmet end of life care needs. Findings include: On 7/2/25 at 12:57 PM, a review of R9's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, acute respiratory failure, high blood pressure, and Alzheimer's disease. Continued review of the record revealed they admitted to Hospice Services on 2/10/25. On 7/2/25 at 8:40 AM, 10:10 AM, 11:25 AM and 11:40 AM requests were made for the facility to provide R9's Hospice staff visit schedule with the defined discipline of whom was visiting (nurse, aide, social services, spiritual staff, etc). On 7/2/25 at 1:54 PM a copy of the visit schedule was provided, however the copy provided was grainy and difficult to read. The schedule included names of contracted hospice staff but it did not indicate the discipline of whom was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms for 26 of 42 resident rooms (#'s: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, and 213, ), resulting in the potential for inadequate space and resident dissatisfaction. Findings Include: On 7/1/25 at approximately 11 AM, a review of the facility bed count information sheets and observations of Medicare/Medicaid resident rooms measurements provided by the facility administrator revealed the following: ROOM# SQ. FT. # OF BEDS 101 149.46 2 102 148.4 2 103 148.4 2 104 148.4 2 105 148.4 2 106 148.4 2 107 148.4 2 108 148.4 2 109 148.4 2 110 149.46 2 111 149.46 2 112 149.46 2 113 149.46 2 201 149.46 2 202 148.4 2 203 148.4 2 204 148.4 2 205 148.4 2 206 148.4 2 207 148.4 2 208 148.4 2 209 148.4 2 210 149.46 2 211 149.46 2 212 148 2 213 148.4 2 Individual and group interviews conducted with residents revealed no complaints regarding the size of their room. The health and safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment in a dignified manner for two residents (R#'s 17 and 70) of two residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential for embarrassment. Findings include: On 6/30/25 at 11:29 AM, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 'B' was observed transporting R70 in their geri-chair. CNA 'B' was observed pulling the geri-chair in a forward motion as R70 was seated in the chair facing rearward. On 6/30/25 at 1:20 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 'C' in the hallway outside of R17's room. CNA 'C' was asked if it was normal for R17 to have slept all morning and remain sleeping into the afternoon. CNA 'C' said sometimes it was her normal and some days she could be, moody. On 7/1/25 at 11:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) regarding language use and appropriate wheelchair transports. The DON said wheelchairs should not be pulled in a forward motion with the resident facing backward and staff were expected to treat residents in a dignified manner. A review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective grievance resolution process to ensure prompt resolution of resident concerns for one (R56) of one resident reviewed for grievances, and seven of eight residents who wished to remain anonymous who attend the resident council interview. Findings include: On 6/30/25 at 10:45 AM, R56 was observed seated in a wheelchair in her room. When queried about the care in the facility, R56 reported she has had clothes and other belongings stolen from her room. R56 reported she caught another resident going through her drawers, the resident took one of her shirts out of the drawer, threw it on the bed, and the next morning R56 noticed a blue and purple shirt were missing. R56 said she has talked to a staff member who no longer worked at the facility about her concerns. Additionally, R56 reported her cellular phone charging cord was taken from her room while she was at therapy. R56 said it was found with a staff member. R56 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator for one (R38) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 6/30/25 at approximately 9:40 AM, it was reported by another resident that R38 often wandered into her room, has gotten into her bed, and threw water on her one time. On 6/30/25 at approximately 10:00 AM, R38 was observed ambulating in the hallways of the second floor unit. R38 was observed standing very closely in other people's space. When spoken to, R38 talked non-sensically. On 7/1/25 at 10:45 AM, R38 was observed wandering the second floor unit, up and down each hallway. At approximately 10:51 AM, R38 entered another resident's room and approached their bed. The other resident yelled, No! Get out! Get out and go to your room! R38 was observed trying to get into the bed of the other resident who was not in the room at that time. At approximately 10:53 AM, a staff member redirected R38 into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop an integrated hospice care plan for one resident (R9) of one resident reviewed for hospice services resulting in the potential for unmet end of life care needs. Findings include: A review of R9's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory failure, high blood pressure, Alzheimer's disease and dementia. A review of a hospice contract indicated they admitted to hospice services on 2/10/25. A review of R9's hospice documentation revealed a care plan developed by the hospice company, however; a review of R9's facility care plans did not reveal a care plan for hospice services nor outline the coordination between the hospice company and the facility. On 7/2/25 at 11:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). They were asked if R9 should have a facility care plan that indicated R9 was on hospice and included interventions and coordination between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dressing changes were completed as documented for one (R55) of two residents reviewed for Skin Conditions. Findings include: On 6/30/25 at 10:03 AM, R55 was observed lying in his bed. A gauze dressing dated 6/25 was observed on R55's left wrist. R55 was asked what the dressing was for. R55 explained he must have hit his wrist on something, and the nurse had wrapped it up. R55 was asked if he knew how often the dressing was changed. R55 explained it had been a couple of days since it had been changed. Review of the clinical record revealed R55 was admitted into the facility on 8/20/24 with diagnoses that included: diabetes, Parkinson's disease and heart disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R55 was cognitively intact. Review of R55's progress notes revealed a Skin Observation note dated 6/15/25 at 6:50 PM that read, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) alerted writer that resident arm was bleeding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number: MI00151566 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective interventions to prevent accidents and failed to assess and determine the root cause of a fall for three (R13, R38, and R72) of six residents reviewed for accidents and supervision, resulting in R13 eloping from the facility, R38 repeatedly entering other residents' rooms and the potential for avoidable accidents. Findings include: R13 On 6/30/25 at 10:13 AM, a resident was observed in R38's room and attempted to get into R38's roommate's bed. At that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'P' was asked if the resident in the room was R38's roommate. LPN 'P' reported the resident was R13 and they should not be in that room. At that time, LPN 'P' asked another staff member to get R13 out of the room. A review of R13's progress notes revealed the following: On 1/5/25, R13 was aggressive, combative, attempted to push other residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00150133 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a stop date for antibiotic treatment for one resident (R#306) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship resulting in the resident receiving numerous additional doses of antibiotic medication. Findings include: On 3/26/25 at 12:30 PM, a review of R306's physician's orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2025 and March 2025 was conducted and revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) 'H' prescribed Ivermectin (antibiotic) on 2/10/25 for the treatment of possible scabies. The order indicated the medication was to be administered on day 1 (2/10/25), day 2 (2/11/25), day 8 (2/17/25), day 9 (2/18/25) and day 15 (2/24/25). It was noted the order did not include a stop date and the medication was continued to be given once daily (with the exception of a few refusals from R306) after day 15 until it was discontinued on 3/26/25. On 3/27/25 at 12:48 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with NP 'H' regarding R306's order for the Ivermectin antibiotic.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00150928 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from misappropriation for one resident, (R302) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation, resulting in a staff member stealing R302's money. Findings include: On 3/27/25 at 9:50 AM, a review of a facility reported incident folder for R302 was completed. The folder contained investigation documentation that included a summary that read, .On 2/27/25 (R302) was brought to the Administrator's office by (Nurse 'D') .(R302) was crying when she entered the office .(Nurse 'D') reported (R302) was upset because she suspected her money had been taken .(R302) confirmed she was upset because she suspected money had been taken from her. (R302) reported she had spoken to her bank after having received and reviewed her bank statement. (R302) said she noticed transactions that she did not make because they happened outside the facility. (R302) had not left the facility, other than for hospital visits, since her admission in early May of 2024. (R302) stated, 'Certified Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00150133. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices related to transmission based precautions (TBP) for two residents (R#'s 300 and 307) of six residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R300 On 3/26/25 at 10:05 AM, R300 was observed seated in their wheelchair near the nursing station on the second floor. An interview was attempted, however; R300 did not offer any verbal response at the attempt. An observation of R300's room revealed no signage to indicate they were on any type of TBP or an isolation caddy hanging on the door containing personal protective equipment (PPE). Additional observations of the room on 3/26/25 at 1:38 PM and 3/27/25 at 10:00 AM continued to reveal no signage for TBP or isolation caddy on the door. On 3/26/25 at 12:00 PM a review of R300's physician's orders was conducted and revealed an active order dated 2/18/25 that read, Contact Isolation for Scabies. R307 On 3/26/25 at 9:55 AM, an observation of R307's room revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00149522. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with injury for one Resident (R701) of three residents reviewed for falls and accidents, resulting in actual harm, when R701 required stitches to their shoulder after falling out of bed. Findings include: On 2/04/25 at 12:25 p.m., R701 was observed in their bed positioned on their back, wearing a hospital gown. R701's left arm was observed flexed at the elbow, with a clenched fist. On 2/04/25 at 12:27 p.m., R701 reported they sustained a fall recently when they rolled off their bed onto the floor. R701 stated, My aide was changing me and (they) stepped out and left me unattended. I rolled out of bed. (They) work the night shift, and it happened on the night shift. I fell over there . R701 pointed to the right side of their hospital bed, to the floor. R701 continued, I didn't have pain, just a cut, and pointed to their left arm, at the shoulder. R701 reported they required 11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00147358 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written transfer notification to the resident's representative including reason, effective dates, and the location to which the resident was being transferred and Ombudsman notification for one Resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for transfers/discharge out of the facility. Findings include: R901's clinical record was reviewed and revealed R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospital stay. R901's admitting diagnoses included aphasia, dementia, anxiety disorder, nutritional deficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R901's primary language was not English and they had severe cognitive impairment. R901 had limited ability to communicate due to their diagnosis of aphasia, cognitive impairment and language barrier. R901's spouse was appointed as their Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medications were documented per facility policy and professional standards on the Medication Monitoring/Control Record and Medication Administration Record for two residents (R#'s 704 and 705) of three residents reviewed for professional standards, resulting in the potential for loss of accountability for controlled substances. Findings include: R704 A review of R704's physician orders, medication administration record (MAR), and Medication Monitoring/Control Record (Control Record) was conducted and revealed the following: An order for alprazolam (controlled substance anti-anxiety medication) on 6/21/24 0.5 mg (milligram) 1 tablet by mouth as needed with instructions that read, PLEASE ALLOW 1 TABLET TO BE GIVEN ONCE EVERY CALENDAR DAY. A review of the MAR was conducted and revealed on 6/24/24 the medication was documented as given at 2:55 AM and again at 10:06 AM. A review of the Control Record revealed one documented as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage of medication and treatment supplies in two of five medication carts. This deficient practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 7/2/24 at approximately 10:10 AM, the medication cart located on the third floor was observed. Registered Nurse (RN) B who was standing near the cart, reported that they had concerns about medication administration and medication storage. RN B pulled out three (brand named) insulin pens that did not have any dates to indicate when they were removed from the refrigerator and placed in the medication cart. RN B reported they should have been dated and was unsure as how to proceed. On 7/2/24 at 12:30 PM, a review of the first floor medication cart was conducted with Nurse 'A'. Review of the cart revealed two insulin pens in the top drawer both sealed with unbroken tamper resistant red tape. It was observed both pens had a sticker that indicated they should be kept in the refrigerator until ready to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00144470 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs by not promptly responding to the call lights for three residents (R800, R801, R802) of three residents interviewed resulting in the residents contacting the facilities receptionist to assist in contacting nursing staff. A complaint was received by the State Agency on 5/11/24 alleging a resident was observed requesting assistance from nursing staff for the duration of their visit (approximated time of 45 minutes to one hour) resulting in the visitor involving assistance from the facility receptionist. A clinical record review revealed R800 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (an autoimmune disease that attacks the nerves in the body) resulting in a self-care performance deficit requiring extensive total staff assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident rights to private and confidential mail delivery was maintained for all residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: According to the facility policy titled, Resident Rights dated Revised February 2021: .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basis rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to .exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States .access to a telephone, mail and email .communicate in person and by mail, email and telephone with privacy . According to MCL-Section 445.33, Sec. 3 2019, Act 48, Eff. [DATE]: .Taking, holding, concealing, or destroying mail addressed to another person; prohibited conduct; violation as a crime; penalties; applicable whether alive or deceased . On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, a resident council interview was conducted with 11 residents who wished to remain anonymous. When asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and visitors had access to previous survey results, resulting in residents and visitors being uninformed of deficiencies identified in the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: According to the facility policy titled, Resident Rights dated Revised February 2021: .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basis rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to .examine survey results . On 5/7/24 at 10:30 AM, a resident council interview was conducted with 11 residents who wished to remain anonymous. When asked about whether they knew where they could access and review the facility's survey binder which included past reports of non-compliance and findings from the State Agency, none could identify where or that anyone had discussed this with them previously. On 5/7/24 at 11:10 AM, Receptionist 'U' was asked where the facility's survey binders were kept and they denied being aware of what that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00143647. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen and ensure food items were labeled, dated and discarded when expired. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/6/24 from 9:08 AM - 10:00 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Certified Food Manager (CFM 'N'), the following items were observed: There were personal items (bags and sweatshirts/jackets stored on top of the containers for bulk oatmeal. CFM 'N' reported those should not be stored on top of the food storage bins. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-307.11 Miscellaneous Sources of Contamination, FOOD shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306. The bin which contained white located near the desk of CFM 'N' was observed with the scoop stored inside the bin, with the handle resting in the rice. CFM 'N' confirmed the scoop should not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that grievances were promptly documented, investigated, tracked and resolved for residents that participate in the resident council. Findings include: On 5/7/24 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Activity Director. When asked to review the resident council minutes, they reported there had been an accident and coffee had been spilled on some of the documents. When asked about whether there was any documentation of follow-up to the concerns/grievances identified in the past resident council meetings as that documentation was not included in the information provide for review, the Activity Director reported since last annual survey, they were putting concerns on grievance forms. When asked where those forms were kept and to provide for review, the Activity Director reported they would follow-up. There was no additional documentation or follow-up regarding the grievances provided by the end of the survey. Review of previous resident council minutes identified the following concerns: On 2/28/24: Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R56 On 5/6/24 at 9:57 AM, R56 was observed sitting up in a wheelchair. R56 reported only receiving 2 showers since their admission (on 4/11/2024) and expressed displeasure related to missing scheduled showers. Review of the clinical record revealed R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: muscle weakness and polyarthritis. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R56 scored 15/15 (which indicated intact cognition). On 5/8/24 at 12:31 PM, DON was queried regarding their current process for documenting resident showers. The DON reported that resident showers should be documented in the electronic health record but they are also documented on paper (shower sheets). A review of the R56's shower task report and of the paper shower sheets provided by the DON revealed resident received one shower on 4/27/24 and refused one shower on 4/24/24. No additional showers were documented and no rationale was provided for the missed showers. A review of the facilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment was free from accident hazards regarding storage of sharps (blood sugar testing lancets) in one of four medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This has the potential to affect multiple residents on the first floor. Findings include: On 5/7/24 at 8:15 AM, observation of the first floor medication cart revealed concerns with storage of sharps. There was a small, white plastic container with a handle (no covering/lid) that contained several items including approximately 40 individual blood sugar testing lancets. There was no nurse in view of the cart, or surrounding area. On 5/7/24 at 8:18 AM, Nurse 'W' who was currently assigned to this medication cart and Nurse 'C' (Agency Nurse arriving to start shift and take over the medication cart) approached the cart and were asked about the storage of the lancets. Nurse 'W' reported they should be in the cart and was unable to explain why they were stored in the storage container on the top of the cart. On 5/7/24 at 8:19 AM, the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have a system in place prior to installing assist bars/rails to ensure appropriate consent, assessment, and physician orders were completed with ongoing monitoring and assessment for eight (R32, R42, R9, R14, R21, R25, R26, R57, and R74) resulting in the potential for inappropriate use and or injury from the device. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 76 residents of the facility. Findings include: R32 R32 was a long-term resident of the facility. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R32's admitting diagnoses included Gout, insomnia, restlessness, and viral hepatitis. Based on the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], R32 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8/15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. R32 had assist rails/bars on their bed. Review of R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) did not reveal any initial/follow-up assessment(s) and clinical rationale for use of assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00141921. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided for the residents that resided on the first floor (including R72 and multiple residents from the confidential resident council meeting), resulting in delayed medication administration and increased potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of allegations reported to the State Agency included complaints of not having adequate nursing staff to provide timely care and assistance. Review of the resident council minutes included the following concerns: On 2/28/24, .there are still issues with the call lights not being answered in a timely manner when agency is in the building . On 3/27/24, .States that there isn't enough of nursing in the building . On 5/7/24 at 10:30 AM, during the confidential resident council meeting, residents were asked if they felt there was adequate nursing staff to meet their needs. Nine of the 11 residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices with regards to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and linen storage for eight of eight residents (R34,R21,R62,R57,R33,R74,R55 and R29) reveiwed for EBP. Findings include: A review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy revealed in part Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply .Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity .EBPs are indicated (when contact precautions do not other apply) for residents with wounds and/or indwelling devices regardless of MDRO colonization .Signs are posted in the door or wall outside the resident room indicating the type of precautions and PPE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143647 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect for one (R73) of five resident reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 10:42 AM, R73 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. An aircast brace was observed on R73's left leg from the knee to the foot. R73 was asked about the care in the facility. R73 explained she had a lot of issues with a particular nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F, like LPN F would say they are drug seeking in front of other residents and staff when they ask for their pain medication and they felt it had affected how other staff treated them at the facility. Review of the clinical record revealed R73 was admitted into the facility on 3/1/24 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: traumatic subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed) with loss of consciousness, displaced trimalleolar fracture (three breaks in the ankle) and adult physical abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R12) was assessed for safe self-administration of medication of one resident reviewed for self-administration, with potential for inappropriate administration of medication. Findings include: R12 R12 was a long-term resident of the facility originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R12 was recently admitted to hospital and readmitted back to the facility on 5/6/24. R12's admitting diagnoses included Pneumonia, lung cancer and depression. R12 had multiple hospitalizations due to their diagnoses and comorbidities. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. An initial observation was completed on 5/6/24, at approximately 3:30 PM. R12 was observed sitting in their bed. An interview was conducted during this observation. R12 reported that they just got back from the hospital. R12 was receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0560 — isolatedProtect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, with a confirmed history of physical abuse, was not threatened to change rooms for staff convenience for one (R73) of one resident reviewed for room change. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 10:42 AM, R73 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. An aircast brace was observed on R73's left leg from the knee to the foot. R73 was asked about the care in the facility. R73 explained she had a lot of issues with a particular nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F and had asked not to have LPN F as their nurse, but had been told they would have to change rooms to not have LPN F as their nurse. R73 explained they loved their room, that it felt like it was their safe place and they did not want to change rooms, but also did not want LPN F as their nurse. When asked who had told them they had to change rooms to have a different nurse, R73 explained it had been the Administrator. Review of the clinical record revealed R73…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00141921. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered and/or the physician was notified of the late administration according to professional standards of practice for one (R72) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of complaints filed with the State Agency included allegations that medications were not being administered per physician orders. On 5/7/24 at 10:30 AM, during the confidential resident council meeting, several residents voiced concerns that they frequently received their medications late on the first floor. On 5/7/24 at 11:00 AM, R72 reported concerns with not getting their scheduled medications and asked, Is it my job to ask for my scheduled medications? I was supposed to take them at 9:00 AM but I still haven't received any for today. According to the profile information, R72 was their own responsible party. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement interventions to prevent the development of a new pressure ulcer and/or worsening of one facility acquired pressure ulcer for one resident (R42) and failed to ensure skin assessments were completed for one (R9) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention and management. Findings include: R42 R42 was long-term resident of the facility, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R42 was recently readmitted after an extended hospital stay due to pneumonia from 2/4/24 and 4/8/24. R42's admitting diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, respiratory failure, and kidney failure. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R42 needed substantial staff assistance to roll/reposition in bed and they were dependent on staff assistance with a Hoyer (total body lift) to get in and out of their bed. R42 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00144347 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of intermittent (straight) catherization for one (R74) of two residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 11:39 AM, R74 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. R74 was asked about care at the facility. R74 explained early that morning, they were having difficulty urinating, they were locked-up and it was very uncomfortable, so they asked if the nurse could straight catheterize (cath) them, the midnight nurse told them they would have to wait for the day nurse to do it as it was almost shift change . and when the day nurse finally did, it took more than one urinal to hold it all. It should be noted that the urinal in R74's room held 1000 milliliters (ml) or 1 liter (L). Review of the clinical record revealed R74 was admitted into the facility on 4/5/24 with diagnoses that included: quadriplegia incomplete (weakness but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident prescribed psychotropic medication (Antipsychotic/AP) had adequate indication for use, appropriate consent to receive the medication, clinical rationale to support continued use in absence of mood/behavior symptoms, as well as identify and monitor resident specific behaviors and approaches for one (R179) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, resulting in unnecessary use of psychotropic medication and the inability to monitor the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to lack of supporting documentation. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at 10:19 AM, R179 was observe laying in their bed. The resident reported they were in the facility for some therapy after recently falling and fracturing several ribs prior to admission. Review of the clinical record revealed R179 was initially admitted into the facility on 4/19/24 with diagnoses that included: spinal stenosis, multiple fractures of ribs, vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00141154. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure facility staff consistently ensured residents were treated in a dignified manner for one (R403) of two residents reviewed for abuse/negligence, resulting in the resident to have felt disrespected. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . (R403 name) indicated she needed to make an incident report with an officer in reference to some improper care she had received from a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) . (R403 name) who stated on this same date, 11-16-23 at 0630 hrs., she was asleep in her room (room number) when she was awakened by a staff member, later ID'd as (CNA J name), cleaning her genitals with a washcloth. Her pajama pants and incontinence pad were lowered onto her thighs. (R403 name) asked (CNA J name) what she was doing, and she did not respond. (CNA J) continued to wash her genitals. (R403 name) feels this activity was indicative of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00141154. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the State Agency (SA) for one (R402) of one resident reviewed for Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R402 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, chronic systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, systemic lupus, and end stage renal disease. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 (which indicated moderately impaired cognition) and required staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a facility Verification Of Investigation form documented in part . DATE OF FINDING: [DATE] . ALLEGATION: On [DATE] at approximately 4:55 PM a code blue was initiated for (R402 name). Facility nurses continued CPR until (Fire Department Name) arrived at 5:11 PM and continued advanced life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely accurate advanced directive/code status was in place for two residents (R226 and R68) out of three residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Findings include: Resident #226 On 5/9/23 the medical record for R226 was reviewed and revealed the following: R226 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Congestive heart failure, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Malignant Neoplasm of colon. A review of R226' MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 3/30/23 revealed R226 needed extensive assistance with most of their activities of daily living. R226's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was 14 indicating intact cognition. A review of R226's EMR (electronic medical record) front profile page revealed R226 had a code status of full code A Physician's order dated 3/25/23 revealed the following: Full code A facility document titled code status elective form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional Nursing standards were appropriately practiced for three residents ( R14, R24 and R58) of three residents reviewed for standards of practice. Findings include: Resident #14 On 5/9/23 at approximately 10:00 a.m., R14 was observed in their room, sitting up in their bed. R14 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their care and they reported that sometimes the facility runs out of their medication. On 5/9/23 the medical record was reviewed. R14 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Muscle Weakness. A review of R14's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/24/23 revealed R14 had a BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) of 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of R14's May 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed R14 was not administered four medications of 5/6/23. The Nursing administration codes for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate skin assessments, and treatments for pressure ulcers were ordered and completed per physician's orders for two residents (R#'s 71 and 226) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy dated 11/28/17 was conducted and read, .To ensure residents that are admitted to the facility are evaluated to determine appropriate measures to be taken by the interdisciplinary care team to determine appropriate measures and individualized interventions to prevent, reduce and treat skin breakdown. It is the practice of this facility to properly identify and evaluate residents whose clinical conditions increase the risk for impaired skin integrity, and pressure ulcers; to implement preventative measures; and to provide appropriate treatment modalities for wounds according to industry standards of care . R71 On 5/9/23 at 8:51 AM, R71 was observed in their bed. R71 was observed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred into a transportation vehicle in a safe manner for one resident (R74) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in R74 hitting their head on the top latch of the transportation/van vehicle causing excessive bleeding, a trip to the emergency department, and a diagnosis of minor closed head injury. Finding include: A review of R 74's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: displaced fracture of left ulna, heart disease, end stage renal failure, dementia, psychotic disturbance and muscle weakness. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 indicating the resident was significantly cognitively impaired. Continued review of R74's clinical record documented, in part, the following: Health Status Note (2/17/23) 12:48 PM (authored by Nurse E): At approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a legally authorized representative signed a binding arbitration agreement (a legal contract that dictates an out-of-court alternate form of dispute resolution) for one resident (R8) of three residents reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. Findings include: On 5/10/23 the medical record for R8 was reviewed and revealed the following: R8 was initially admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and CVA (stroke). A review of R8's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/29/22 revealed R8 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with their activities of daily living. R8's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was three indicating severely impaired cognition. A review of R8's binding arbitration agreement revealed it was signed by R8's daughter on 11/22/2019. Further review of the agreement revealed the following documentation: .Do you have any other questions about the agreement? [Yes]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms for 26 of 42 resident rooms (#'s: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, and 213, ), resulting in the potential for inadequate space. Findings Include: On 5/6/24 at 2:30 p.m , a review of the facility bed count information sheets and observations of Medicare/Medicaid resident rooms revealed the following: ROOM# SQ. FT. # OF BEDS 101 156 2 102 147 2 103 147 2 104 148 2 105 147 2 106 148 2 107 147 2 108 147 2 109 147 2 110 155 2 111 154 2 112 145 2 113 145 2 201 156 2 202 148 2 203 148 2 204 148 2 205 148 2 206 148 2 207 148 2 208 148 2 209 148 2 210 154 2 211 155 2 212 145 2 213 146 2 Individual interviews conducted with residents revealed no complaints regarding the size of their room. The health and safety of the residents were not affected by the room size.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$434,664 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $174,142 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
- $39,926 — penalty dated 2025-07-02
- $205,003 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-31 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VILLA HEALTHCARE — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMNIA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2023 |
| AARON, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| BAUMOL, YEHOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| CALDARONA, DAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| GRAF, MARCELLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| SINGERMAN, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235489. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.