Harmony Village of Clinton
17001 17 Mile Road, Clinton Township, MI 48038 · For profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (586) 286-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.9% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.4% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.2% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.6% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.4% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.9% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 11.7% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.71 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 76% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.3%CMS range 37.7–66.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 8.3–17.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 3.8–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 75.6 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2684900,2686660,2687810, and 2689521.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent financial exploitation for one resident (R700) out of two reviewed for misappropriation of funds, resulting in mental anguish and emotional distress. Findings include:A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) noted the following, . Findings: Misappropriation of Resident Funds, Substantiated Psychological abuse, Substantiated Conclusion: An investigation was initiated on 11/25/2025 after [R700] reported concerns involving the Business Office Manager, [Business Office Manager (BOM) B. Through multiple interviews and review of documentation and phone messages voluntarily presented by the resident, the facility identified information suggestive of financial exploitation, misappropriation of resident funds, and violations of professional boundaries. As [R700] is under full guardianship and legally incapacitated, [R700] does not have the authority to consent to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00140142 and MI00139650. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one resident (R602) of three reviewed for abuse resulting in R602 being choked by R603, causing small scratch around R602's neck. Findings include: A review of the intake allegation noted, Details: It was reported there was a resident to resident physical abuse incident that did not result in injury. A review of R603's progress notes revealed, 8/14/2023 06:11 Nursing Progress Note Text: Patient is being combative with assigned CNA (Certifed Nursing Assistant). CNA was completing morning rounds and attempted to change patient's clothes, but patient began to become aggressive toward CNA and CNA notified writer. 8/14/2023 20:17 (9:17 PM), Nursing Progress Note Text: Resident came out of room and became physical with another resident (R602). Resident would not let go until staff had to grab [R603]. Resident then became…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing postings were completed and readily accessible for all 74 residents, families, and visitors in the facility. Findings include: On 6/4/25 at 2:02 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was requested to provide the daily staff postings for the past 18 months. The NHA provided a 2024 binder and explained they were gathering the 2025 postings. A review of the binder revealed forms dated 11/3/24, 11/6/24, and 7/2/2024 that were incomplete, missing dates, and staffing information. On 6/4/25 at 2:21 PM, the staffing coordinator acknowledged the forms were incomplete. On 6/4/25 at 2:58 PM, the facility provided the 2025 postings for the months of March through June. The postings for January 2025 and February 2025 were not provided by the end of the survey. On 6/4/25 at 2:58 PM, after a review of the postings the NHA was asked about the missing and incomplete forms. The NHA confirmed, the forms were not completed correctly. A review of the facility's policy titled Nurse Staffing Posting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store nebulizer masks and a bi-pap mask for three residents (R15, R17, and R25) out of ten reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R15 On 6/2/2025 at 9:53 AM, R15's nebulizer mask was observed sitting on the nightstand with no barrier noted between the mask and the nightstand. R15 explained they use their nebulizer everyday. A review of the medical record revealed that R15 admitted into the facility on 7/9/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, Epilepsy and Personal History of Covid-19. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R15 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. R17 On 6/2/2025 at 9:39 AM, R17 was observed in the bed. R17's nebulizer mask and bi-pap mask were observed sitting on the nightstand, no barrier noted between the masks and the nightstand. R17 was asked how often they use the nebulizer and the bi-pap and they replied quite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated and accurate advance directive (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) information was in place for one resident (R57) of one resident reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: A review of R57's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction, Major Depressive Disorder, and Dysphasia. Further review revealed the resident was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. Upon reviewing the resident's medical record, the resident's code status which was displayed at the top of their medical record revealed the code status of DNR (do not resuscitate). Further review of R57's medical record revealed a document dated and signed by the resident on [DATE] and titled Medical Treatment Decision Form noting a check mark by CPR full resuscitation. I request that in the event my heart and breathing stop, I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment for one resident (R18) of two residents reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: On 6/02/25 at 10:00 AM, R18 was observed sitting in the wheelchair watching television in their room. A large approximately 12 inch round dark brown stain was noted on the ceiling tile directly above the head of the bed. R18 was asked about the stain and stated that stain was there when he moved there. R18 stated it needs to be fixed and they had mentioned it to someone but nothing had been done. A record review revealed that R18 was admitted on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] noted Brief Interview in Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicates intact cognition. On 06/04/25 at 1:40 PM, an observation of R18's room occurred with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to follow the recommendation of a OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) Level II Evaluation for one (R61) of five residents reviewed for PASARRs (Preadmission Screen Resident Review). Findings include: A review of R61's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/17/23 with diagnoses which included Type II Diabetes, Depression and Hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was cognitively intact and independent for transfers. Further review of R61's medical record revealed an OBRA evaluation dated 8/27/24 revealing the following, .O. Recommendations .[R61] would like to move to a senior apartment type setting where [they] could have medical assistance/home healthcare to come in assist [them] with [their] diabetic issues. [R61] appears to have gained insight into the importance of successfully managing [their] diabetes. [R61] wants to live in a less restrictive setting and feels that [they] have gained the skills to be successful. [R61] requires minimal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect the resident's current status for one resident (R61), of one resident reviewed for care plan revision. Findings include: On 6/2/25 at 11:02 AM, R61 was observed sitting up in bed and asked about any concerns they've had in the facility. R61 explained they had a pair of dentures when they first admitted into the facility however, they didn't fit properly. R61 explained they had been seen by the dentist last year in June, in which the dentures were to be realigned however, that has yet to be completed and, they no longer have the dentures. A review of R61's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/17/23 with diagnoses which included Type II Diabetes, Depression and Hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was cognitively intact and independent for transfers. A review of R61's care plan revealed the following, Focus: I have an ADL (activities of daily living) Self Care Performance Deficit r/t (related to) dx (diagnoses) of mood disorder, DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 1:1 feeding assistance for one resident (R47) out of two reviewed for feeding assistance. Findings include: On 6/2/2025 at 12:08 PM, R47 was observed eating lunch, unassisted. R47 was observed leaning to their right side and food was on their gown. A review of the meal ticket stated 1:1 feeding assistance. A review of the medical record revealed R47 admitted into the facility on 4/23/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Multiple Sclerosis and Dysphagia. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R47 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the diet order revealed R47 required 1:1 feeding assistance. On 6/3/2025 at 1:14 PM, R47 was noted to be eating lunch unassisted. On 6/4/2025 at 8:56 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Dietitian (RD) D. RD D indicated that R47 is a 1:1 feed and that they are being followed by Speech Therapy. RD D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer (PU) interventions to prevent pressure ulcer reoccurance for one resident (R43) out of two reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 6/2/2025 at 9:48 AM, R43 was observed in the bed sleeping. R43 was observed laying on their back, heels laying flat on the mattress, no positioning wedges or pillows were noted in the bed. On 6/2/2025 at 11:48AM, R43 was observed to be laying on their back with no positioning devices in place. On 6/2/2025 at 2:03 PM, R43 was observed with their head of bed (HOB) elevated, in a sitting position and sleeping. A review of the medical record revealed R43 admitted in the facility on 11/15/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Pressure ulcer of Left Buttock, Stage IV (4- Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer). A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement dietary restrictions for one resident (R45) out of two reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 6/1/2025 at 9:51 AM, R45 was observed laying in bed a water cup with a straw was observed next to them dated 6/1/2025 NTL (Nectar Thickened Liquids). A review of the medical record revealed R45 admitted into the facility on 4/29/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R45 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the diet order revealed R45 was not to have straws related to Dysphagia. On 6/2/2025 at 10:15 AM, R45 was noted to have a straw in their water cup. On 6/2/2025 at 11:57 AM, R45 was noted to still have a straw in their water cup. A review of their diet ticket also noted no straws. Unit Manager (UM) B was queried as to if R45 should have a straw in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely secure an oxygen cylinder/tank for one sampled resident (R54) of four review for accidents. Findings include: On 6/02/25 at 12:15 PM, R54 was observed sitting up in their bed, observed next to the bed was a wheelchair. The wheelchair had an oxygen cylinder/tank that sat in the seat of the wheelchair and leaned on the back of the chair. The oxygen cylinder/tank was observed to have a layer of dust and cobwebs (abandoned spider webs) on it. R54 was asked how long the oxygen cylinder/tank had been in the wheelchair as observed. R54 reported that it has been there a while. R54 was asked to explained a while and R54 was unable to provide a timeline. On 6/4/25 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if they were aware of the oxygen cylinder/tank that was in R54's wheelchair. The DON stated, Yes. The DON was asked how oxygen cylinders/tank are to be stored, and explained the tank is to be stored secured in a carrier and once done placed in the oxygen storage room. A review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for an Antipsychotic (Seroquel) for one resident (R32) out of one reviewed for GDRs. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed that R32 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Vascular Dementia and Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating a severely impaired cognition. R32 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the active physician orders revealed the following, Seroquel (Antipsychotic) 25 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day and Seroquel 50 mg by mouth at bedtime. On 6/4/2025 at 9:22 AM, an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and a request for any documented GDR attempt was requested but not received by the end of survey. A review of a facility policy titled, Gradual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely follow-up on dental services related to dentures for one resident (R61) of one resident reviewed for dental services. Findings include: On 6/2/25 at 11:02 AM, R61 was observed sitting up in bed and asked about any concerns they've had in the facility, and explained they had a pair of dentures when they first admitted into the facility however, they didn't fit properly. R61 explained they had been seen by the dentist last year (2024) in June, in which the dentures were to be realigned however, that has yet to be completed and, they no longer have the dentures. R61 explained they were told that a follow-up would occur but hasn't received an update. R61 further explained their jaw has been hurting, making it difficult to chew. A review of R61's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/17/23 with diagnoses which included Type II Diabetes, Depression and Hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was cognitively intact and independent for transfers. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145809. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated to reflect the wandering and related fall and bowel and bladder behaviors and document interventions for them. Findings include: A review of an incident report for R901 documented a fall on 06/21/24 and was found at 6:40 AM with a last seen time of 5:30 AM. R901 was sent out to the hospital with a head injury. A physical (rehab) medicine note dated 04/16/24 documented, .evaluated secondary to fall and decline in function . A review of a psychiatric note dated 05/23/24 documented, .Dementia with Behaviors .Last seen by writer 01/31/24, Patient was seen and evaluated and discussed with staff. (R901) is reported to have increased confusion and restlessness .will start risperdal .3/12/24 increased risperdal .noted to wander and can be quite intrusive with peers .per staff the increase in risperdal has not helped .requires constant redirection reported to continue to be impulsive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake M100143094. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate, meaningful weekend activities for facility residents including eight anonymous group participants. Findings include: On 04/24/24 at 2:29 PM, eight anonymous group participants indicated the facility no longer had activities department staff working on the weekends and no organized or meaningful activities were being provided or facilitated. The group participants reported being bored and having nothing to do on weekends. Review of the facility Activities calendar for March and April 2024 revealed all Saturdays stated Independent leisure activities can be found in the dining room and all Sundays stated 10 AM Independent activity and 1:30 PM Afternoon Worship. On 04/25/24 at 9:37 AM, the facility Activities Director (AD) reported the facility no longer employed Activities aides. The AD reported they work a full time day shift schedule and therefore there are no dedicated Activities department employees scheduled on weekends. The AD reported they set up items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 4/23/24 between 8:45 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: There was a personal cell phone on the food preparation counter. On 4/23/24 at 11:15 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) P confirmed the cell phone should not have been left on the food preparation counter. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-307.11 Miscellaneous Sources of Contamination, FOOD shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306. The flour bin located inside the dry storage room was observed with the scoop stored inside the bin, with the handle resting in the flour. On 4/23/24 at 11:17 AM, DM P confirmed the scoop should not have been stored inside the flour. According to the Food & Drug administration (FDA) 2017 Model Food Code, Section 3-304.12 In-Use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Director met the required professional qualifications. Findings include: On 04/25/24 at 9:37 AM, the facility Activities Director (AD) was interviewed and reported they had been in the AD position for approximately one month. The AD reported they are a Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) and they had been working in the facilities therapy department prior to accepting the AD position. The AD reported they planned to take college classes to pursue Therapeutic Recreation-related credentialing but they were not currently participating in this training/education. On 04/25/24 at 1:06 PM, the AD reported they transitioned directly from the therapy dept. to the AD position and they did not have recent/previous experience in an Activities department. On 04/25/24 at 1:30 PM, the facility Administrator (NHA) acknowledged the current AD did not meet the required professional qualifications. The NHA reported the facility had provided the AD with the resources to pursue their credentialing for the position and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Advanced Directive was in place timely for one (R73) of four residents reviewed for Advance Directives (AD-legal documents that allows a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility or other healthcare providers. Findings Include: Review of electronic health record (EHR) on [DATE] at 1:23 p.m. revealed R73 did not have a code status in the banner or a signed advance directive form. Review of an admission Record revealed, R73 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included End Stage Renal Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated of [DATE] revealed R73 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 and required dialysis. On [DATE] at 8:48 a.m., an Advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for a newly identified facility acquired pressure ulcer for one resident (R441) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 4/23/24 at 9:26 AM, R441 was observed in bed lying on their backside, face grimacing and indicating that they were in pain. On 4/23/24 at 11:37am and 2:23pm, R441 was observed in the same position as they had been earlier that morning. A review of R441's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 3/5/24 with diagnoses that included Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Depression. Further review of the medical record revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required total dependence for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the wound doctor's Visit report for 4/12/24 revealed the following, Wound #1 Sacral is a Stage 3 Pressure Injury Pressure Ulcer and has received a status of Not healed.Sequela wound encounter measurements are 2.2cm (centimeters)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R441) of four residents reviewed were repositioned timely and appropriately resulting in an acquired pressure ulcers (damage to skin and underlying tissue over bony areas). Findings include: On 4/23/24 at 9:26 AM, R441 was observed lying on their back. R441 heels were on bed surface with a small foam boot around her right ankle and another small foam boot lying under the left calf. A review of the facility's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R441 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Atrial Fibrillation, Myocardial Infarction (heart attack), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Chronic Kidney Disease, Morbid Obesity (severe), Dysphagia, Low Back Pain, and Dementia. R441's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed severe cognitive impairment. On 4/23/24 at 11:37 AM and 2:30 PM, R441 was observed lying on their back with heels on surface of bed. No heel protection in place On 4/24/24 at 9:04 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and document weight loss interventions for one resident (R5) of two residents reviewed for nutrition resulting in weight loss. Findings include: On 4/23/24 at 10:44 AM, R5 was observed lying in bed in a fetal position. R5's appearance was very thin and emaciated (muscle and fat loss) with skeletal appearance and visible bones beneath skin surface, sunken cheeks, and very thin arms and legs. R5's water pitcher was observed with thickened liquid and a straw on his overbed table. A review of the facilities electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R5 was admitted on [DATE]. R5's diagnoses included Metabolic Encephalopathy, Adult Failure to Thrive, Urinary Tract Infection, Diabetes Mellitus, Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Hypertension, and Dysphagia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a severe cognitive impairment. 4/24/24 at 12:16 PM, R5 was observed in bed, with head of bed elevated to 45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a tube feeding in accordance with the physician's orders for one resident (R81) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the potential for weight loss and dehydration. Findings include: In an observation on 4/23/24 at 9:13 a.m., R81 had a tube feeding pump in room with no feeding running. Review of an admission Record revealed, R81 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included severe protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated of 1/9/24 revealed R81 had cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 (indicating severely impaired cognition) and required a feeding tube. Review of Physician orders revealed R81 had an order for Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding formula) one time a day to be up at 5pm until dose complete. Review of a Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain Physicians orders for dialysis treatment and to monitor the dialysis site (catheter) for one (R73) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services, resulting in the potential for undetected complications associated with receiving dialysis, including bleeding, infection, and site failure. Findings include: In an interview on 4/24/24 at 9:14 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M reported R73 has dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. Review of an admission Record revealed, R73 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included End Stage Renal Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated of 3/1/24 revealed R73 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 and required dialysis. Review of Physician orders revealed R73 did not have an order for dialysis or to monitor the dialysis site.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the temperatures of one of one medication refrigerator that stored drugs and biologicals. Findings include: On 4/25/24 at 9:50 AM, the Station One medication refrigerator was viewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN F). The temperature log for April 2024 had no documentation for the AM shift, and three days missing on the PM shift: 4/23, 4/24, and 4/25. The temperature log for March 2024 was missing multiple days without refrigerator temperature documentation that included no temperatures taken on the AM shift, and no documentation on 3/29, 3/30, and 3/31. The temperature log for February was missing the following temperature documentation for the AM shift: 2/1, 2/2, 2/4, 2/6, 2/8, 2/16, and 2/21-2/29, and no PM temperature documentation for 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/5, 2/9, 2/16, 2/19 and 2/24. The temperature log for January was missing the following temperatures during the AM shift: 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/8, 1/9, 1/11, 1/13, 1/15-1/17, 1/22, 1/23, 1/25. 1/27, 1/31, and no PM temperature documentation on: 1/13,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00141330. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to prevent a fall for one resident (R701) of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: On 3/6/24 at 10:27 AM, a review of R701's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following progress note, 10/28/23 14:37 (2:37 PM): CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) notified writer resident was on floor laying on their stomach, resident fell out of bed during a check and change, resident stated 'I didn't hit my head during the fall.' On 3/6/24 at 10:30 AM, a Post-fall/Fall Risk Assessment involving R701 was reviewed and revealed the following, Briefly .described what occurred: CNA notified writer resident was on floor lying on their stomach, resident fell out of bed during a check and change, resident stated, 'I didn't hit my head during the fall.' Date and Time of incident: 10/28/23 12:00. Was the resident injured? No injuries observed. On 3/6/24 at 10:40 AM, R701's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00137037 and MI00137858. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document skin treatments per order or complete weekly skin checks, affecting two residents (R908 and R910) of three reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs, skin breakdown, or ongoing skin issues. Findings include: R908 A review of R908's record revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on 3/3/23 with medical diagnoses of Sepsis due to Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA), Idiopathic Chronic Gout with Tophi, Hepatic Failure, Infarction Of Spleen, Dysphagia, Repeated Falls, Respiratory Failure, Urine Retention, Morbid Obesity, Muscle Weakness, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Further review revealed that R908 was dependent on or required extensive staff assistance for bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. R908 was noted to enter into the facility on 3/3/23 with skin impairments, however, the earliest treatment orders initiated were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00136203. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility's staff failed to report a fall for one sampled resident (R906), resulting in a delay in treatment for a fractured right hip. Findings included: A review of the intake revealed, Incident Summary Resident (R906) was unable to move [R906] right leg. Physician was notified and a stat xray was ordered. Radiology report identified an intertrochanteric fracture of the proximal right femur with varus deformity. Physician notified of the results and ordered the resident to be sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Investigation of injury of unknown origin immediately initiated. On 9/19/23 at 12:33 PM R906 was observed in bed and was asked if they had a fall. R906 stated, Yes a while ago. R906 was not able to provide details of the fall. R906's bed was observed with the left side against the wall and the right side opened to the room with a floor mat next to the bed. On 9/20/23 at 11:58 AM, R906 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00135079. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document medication refusals for one resident (R903) of three reviewed, resulting in an inaccurate representation of the resident's status and a lack of documented rationale for subtherapeutic serum drug levels. Findings include: A review of R903's record revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 3/6/23. The resident never returned to the facility. R903's medical diagnoses included Epilepsy, Hemiplegia/Hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Bipolar Disorder, Multiple Sclerosis, Obesity, Dysphagia, and Liver Disease. A review of R903's medication orders included the following anti-seizure medications: -Valproic Acid Solution 250 MG (milligrams)/5ML (milliliters) (Valproate Sodium) Give 10 ml by mouth every 6 hours for Seizure disorder -Start Date- 11/07/2022 -D/C (discontinue) Date- 03/08/2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-08 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one resident (R85) of six residents reviewed for social service needs to meet the psychosocial, mental, and behavioral health care needs of the residents, resulting in the potential to affect all residents that require the services of a social worker. Findings include: On 2/8/2023 at 10:30 AM, a confidential group meeting was held with six confidential residents. During the confidential group two residents stated that they have never seen a social worker. Confidential group members stated that they have asked to see the social worker on many occasions, and no one ever comes. The group collectively stated that they do not have regular care conferences and don't receive help with things such as discharge planning and obtaining outside resources. On 2/8/2023 at 1:15 PM, an interview was conducted with Social Worker (SW) B regarding their role in the facility. SW B stated that they work part-time at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to offer/provide HS (hour of sleep) snacks to five (R78, R41, R32, R98 and R96) of 23 sampled residents resulting in resident dissatisfaction with snack provision. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R78 revealed an admission date of 2/22/22 with diagnoses that included cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure. Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R78 required set up to maximum self care assistance and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognitive function. On 2/06/23 at 11:14 AM, R78 reported that they do not get offered or provided with bedtime snacks and stated, The only time I get a snack at night is if my roommate brings me one back from the nurses' station. On 2/07/23 at 10:03 AM, R78 reported that a snack was not offered or provided by staff the previous night. Review of the facility record for R41 revealed an admission date of 10/15/20 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed and/or documented for four residents (R48, R56, R69, and R81) out of six reviewed for care conferences, resulting in residents and resident representatives not informed or included in their plan of care. Findings Include: R48 On 2/8/2023 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R48 regarding their care conferences being held in the facility. R48 stated that they did not who their social worker was and that they had never had a care conference since admitting in the facility. A review of the medical record revealed that R48 admitted into the facility on 5/26/2022 with the following diagnoses, Muscles Weakness and Hypertension. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15 indicating impaired cognition. R48 also required extensive one person assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the progress notes revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of notice of bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one sampled resident (R90) of one resident reviewed for transfers, resulting in the potential for residents and/or resident representatives not being aware of the facility bed hold policy. Findings include: On 2/6/23 at 9:03 AM, R90 was asked about their stay in the facility, and explained that they would prefer to transfer back to the room they resided in prior to their transfer to the hospital in December 2022. R90 explained that they were admitted into the hospital for approximately one week and upon return, was placed in their current room. R90 was asked if they received a bed hold notice upon transfer to the hospital, and they indicated that they did not. A review of R90's medical record revealed that they were initially admitted into the facility on 1/23/22 with diagnoses that included Lymphedema, Sleep Apnea, Hypertension and Hoarding Disorder. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to update a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR screening) for two sampled residents (R63, R85, and R38) out of seven residents reviewed for PASARR screenings, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health and psychiatric care needs. Findings Include: R63 A review of R63's PASARR Level I screening dated 12/31/2020 was completed and revealed that Section II, numbers 1 and 2 on the form were checked Yes with the diagnosis of Mental Illness checked and included a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder. R63 was also taking antipsychotics at the time. On 2/7/23 at 3:30 PM, R63's PASSAR Level I screening for 2021 and 2022 was requested from the facility, and not received by the end of the survey. R85 A review of R85's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia, Delirium, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement skin care interventions per the plan of care for one sampled resident (R8) out of two residents reviewed for care plan interventions resulting in, the potential for skin integrity concerns. Findings include: On 2/06/23 at 10:09 AM, R8 was observed in bed and asked about the stay at the facility and stated, They are not rubbing me down with lotion. R8's legs and feet were observed with very dry and flaky skin on their legs and feet. Large skin debris were observed laying on the sheet of the bed. On 2/07/23 at 10:51 AM, R8 was observed in bed with their legs and feet in the same condition. On 2/08/23 at 10:28 AM, R8 was asked if staff had put any lotion on their legs and feet today and stated, No. They move so fast. At that time R8's legs were appeared dry and flaky. There were large skin debris were observed laying on the sheet of the bed some brown and white in color. On 2/08/23 at 10:35 AM, the Unit Manager, Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans to reflect current status and needs for three sampled residents (R10, R85, R34) of four residents reviewed for care plan accuracy resulting in, the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: R10 A review of R10's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dysphagia, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Diabetes. Further review revealed a Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] which revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7/15 indicating a severely impaired cognition, and required supervision to extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed an active care plan addressing the following, .I [R10]smoke cigarettes. Date Initiated: [DATE] .Revision on: [DATE] .Interventions: I require no supervision while smoking. Date Initiated: [DATE] . Instruct me about the facility policy on smoking:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed accurately document the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of care and negative clinical outcomes, affecting all 48 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's provided documentation of 18 months of staff posting revealed the following days marked with 0 or blank for RN scheduled eight hours during a 24 hour period: November 2022 11/01 11/02 11/06 11/08 11/11 11/13 11/14 11/18 11/22 11/26 11/27 11/28 December 2022 12/2 12/11 12/12 12/16 12/17 12/20 12/21 12/25 12/26 12/31 January 2023 1/3 1/9 1/17 1/22 1/23 1/28 1/31 February 2023 2/5 2/6 2/28 On 2/08/23 at 3:14 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked about the days that were missing RN coverage and explained she needed to go find out, because agency staff may have not been counted for those days. On 2/8/23 at 3:45 PM, the NHA replied via email noted, We are looking at the RN coverage for those specified days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that seven Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's F, G, H, I, J, K, and L) whose in-service training files were reviewed, had the required 12 hours annual in-service training within the required time period, resulting in the potential for unmet educational needs and unmet resident care needs. Findings include: On 2/7/23 at 11:01 AM, the Administrator was requested to provide the annual 12-hour in-service education for CNA's F hire date 4/8/1994, G hire date 4/15/2021, H hire date 10/31/1996, I hire date 11/03/2021, J hire date 12/27/2016, K 1/17/1991, L hire date and hire date 3/12/2019. The facility provided in-services for the above CNAs that did not document the duration of each in-service. The documents were titled Pre/Post Test. On 2/08/23 at 11:18 AM, the Administrator was asked for documentation that reflected the durations and dates of the in-services completed by the selected CNAs. The Administrator stated, I will have someone come down and help with that information. On 2/08/23 at 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and acknowledged recommendations and irregularities identified by the consultant pharmacist during medication regimen reviews for one (R32) of five residents reviewed for Medication Regimen Review (MRR). Findings include: R32 Review of the clinical record revealed R32 was initially admitted into the facility on and readmitted on [DATE] readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Delirium due to known Physiological condition, Psychotic Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Further review of R32's medical record noted, progress noted, 11/10/22 Psych Services Progress note. AIMS, Med review . ASSESSMENT & PLAN Major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate . Plan: Patient was seen and evaluated and discussed with staff. [R32] presents as calm, cooperative, and pleasant with underlying confusion noted. [R32]appears less somatically preoccupied and anxious than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain psychotropic medication consent and ensure the appropriate use of and rationale for the use of a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication beyond 14 days for one sampled resident (R85) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications resulting in, unnecessary medication use with the increased potential for adverse side effects. Findings include: A review of R85's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia, Delirium, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, and Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage. Further review of the medical record revealed that R85 was severely cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed the following physician order, Order Summary: Ativan Tablet 1 MG (Lorazepam). Give 1 mg (milligram) by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation. The order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a palatable manner for two residents (R96, and R98) in a census of 113 residents reviewed for food and nutrition, resulting in dissatisfaction with the meal service. Findings include: On 02/06/23 at 10:02 AM and 3:10 PM, R98 and R96 were interviewed. They commented they were always the last unit to be served. R98 and R96 agreed this could be due to the facility being short staffed. On 02/06/23 at 11:40 AM, the lunch tray cart was observed delivered to the 300 hall. The meals were served in white foam clamshell take out style containers. On 02/06/23 at 12:21 PM, the food trays were delivered on the 100 hall. The meal items were served in white foam clamshell containers. R16 reported they felt they received potato, rice or pasta every day. On 02/06/23 at 1:21 PM, R103 was asked about the food and reported, It's like dog food, I order out spending $200.00 dollars a month on food. On 02/06/23 at 1:30 PM, R41 reported the food was often served cold and not appetizing to look at. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure routine food preferences were honored for four residents (R96, R98, and R105) in a census of 113 reviewed for care concerns, resulting in disatisfaction with the meal service. Findings include: On 02/06/23 at 10:02 AM and 3:10 PM, R98 and R96 were interviewed. The residents reported that their meal tickets indicated double portions but did not always get them. R96 commented they had received egg salad with just a single (ice cream scoop size) scoop of the egg salad with the bread and that was it. R98 agreed. They further commented they were always the last unit to be served and have been told the food items had run out or staff could not get them seconds at that time. R98 reported that had asked for peanut butter crackers for nightime snack because they are diabetic but does not always get them. A review of the meal tickets for R96 and R98 documented, Double Portions, Everything in capital letters for each meal. On 02/07/23 at 9:13 AM, R105 reported they had received two orange juice cups and a water and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARMONY VILLAGE OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2025 |
| GITBERK LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| GITBERK TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| INDIGO MICHIGAN NH1 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| JBL 120 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| JBL 120 TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2025 |
| JM AND MAZEL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| MAZEL FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| FISHMAN, SHMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| CHM MI LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| BUTLER, EBONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2025 |
| SALEH, MOHAMMAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/23/2026 |
| YOPP-CARTER, SHAYLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/23/2026 |
| CLINTON REALTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| HARMONY VILLAGE PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| DIPASQUA, JASON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| ORGEL, JOSEPH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235405. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.