No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Healthcare At Forest Hill

100 Reservoir Road, St Clairsville, OH 43950 · For profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (740) 695-7233 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 695-7233 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$26,685 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
106 Plaza Dr · (740) 526-0731 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 Plaza Dr · (740) 695-0274 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
104 Plaza Dr · (740) 695-3401 · Call to confirm hours
Park
200 Walnut Ave · (740) 298-2787 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.5%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.371.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.411.801.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.2%CMS range 40.4–58.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.8–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.0–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
56.3%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 69.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, emergency medical service and hospital record review, interview, policy review and review of nursing standards of practice, the facility failed to ensure Resident #58 was free of unnecessary medication without adequate monitoring. This affected one (#58) of three residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 61. Actual Harm occurred on 10/26/25 when Resident #58, a resident with a known low heart rate requiring cardiovascular medications to be held due (due to low heart rate) was administered four cardiovascular medications resulting in the resident becoming unresponsive one hour after medication administration. Resident #58 was transported to the emergency room by ambulance, where she was treated with intravenous fluids for hypotension (low blood pressure) a result of the medication administration. Prior to the administration of the medications, the facility failed to implement systems to ensure blood pressure monitoring was completed to prevent medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, review of medication error reports and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without significant error. Actual harm occurred on 06/06/25 when Resident #10, who had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent of staff to prepare and administer medications, received medications prescribed for another resident that included cardiac medications that lower the heart rate and blood pressure, medication to prevent platelets from clumping together, medication to treat gout and antianxiety medications. This resulted in the resident experiencing a change in condition requiring transport to the emergency room. The resident was subsequently admitted and treated for hypotension (low blood pressure) and bradycardia (low pulse) with intravenous fluids and an overnight hospital stay for monitoring secondary to the medication error after receiving incorrect medication that was prescribed for another resident. This affected one resident (#10) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in form to meet residents' needs. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for specialized diets. The facility census was 69. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and dysphagia. Review of orders revealed Resident #2 had an order dated 09/23/24 for a regular diet and texture would be mechanical soft with pureed meats and thin consistency liquids. Review of a care plan dated 02/17/26 revealed Resident #2 had nutritional problems or potential nutritional problems related to presence of chronic disease, a mechanically altered diet, malnutrition risk, and need for supplements. Goals included being free from complaints of hunger or thirst and accepting food as desired and tolerated. Interventions included but were not limited to monitor/document/report to provider as needed for signs and symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control protocols for residents with orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). This had the potential to affect ten (Residents #8, #20, #44, #45, #54, #59, #61, #67, #73 and #78) of 15 residents observed during meal service and one (Resident #9) of one residents observed during administration of medication through a feeding tube.Findings Include: Based on observations, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control protocols for residents with orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). This had the potential to affect ten (Residents #8, #20, #44, #45, #54, #59, #61, #67, #73 and #78) of 15 residents observed during meal service and one (Resident #9) of one residents observed during administration of medication through a feeding tube.Findings Include:1. During observations of lunch delivery service on 01/12/26, Activity Assistant #75 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident personal belongings were moved after a room change. This affected one resident (Resident #64) of two residents reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 69.Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, anxiety, urinary tract infections, and stage 4 chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #64's admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 11/13/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15.Interview on 01/14/26 at 1:36 P.M. with family representative of Resident #64 revealed during Christmas (December of 2025) Resident #64's family purchased a new leather recliner chair for the resident and a new blanket. The chair and blanket were delivered to her previous room (the resident had a room change during a hospitalization but after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure urologist follow-up appointments were scheduled for residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (Resident #64) of one residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 69.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and urinary tract infections.Review of Resident #64 hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed on 10/31/25 a foley catheter was inserted due to a bladder scan revealing 520 milliliter (ML) of urine in the bladder. No voiding trail was completed upon discharge, recommend outpatient urology follow up.Review of Resident #64's admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 11/13/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, and the resident had an indwelling catheter.Review of Resident #64's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications. This affected one resident (Resident #61) of 20 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy and one resident (Resident #69) of six residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 69.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/25. Diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, hypertension, epilepsy, insomnia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, history of accidental methadone poisoning, and migraine. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and received anti-convulsant (seizure) and antidepressant medication.Review of a nursing note dated 12/15/25 at 2:15 P.M. indicated Resident #61 returned from a neurology appointment with orders to increase Baclofen to 20 mg twice daily, continue Keppra 1500 mg twice daily, continue Prozac 40 mg daily,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, medical record review and staff interview with facility failed to ensure documentation of toileting was completed every shift in the medical record. This affected two (Residents #28 and #29) of two residents reviewed for toileting assistance. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 10/02/23 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus type II, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Further review of the medical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment with a reference date of 10/10/25 indicated Resident #28 had a modified independent cognition level and required maximum assistance with toileting. Review of Resident #28's care plans revealed an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit including need for toileting assistance. Review of the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) toileting records revealed numerous shifts with no evidence documented of toileting assistance provided including 12/17/25 evening shift (PM),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, medication information review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered and/or in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. Three errors out of 28 opportunities were identified resulting in a 10.7% medication error rate. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: On 06/26/25 at 8:01 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 was observed administering medication to Resident #5. Medications administered included two tablets of Potassium Chloride extended release (ER) 10 milliequivalents (meq) and one tablet of verapamil ER 240 milligrams (mg) (calcium channel blocker used to treat high blood pressure and angina). The tablets were crushed and added to other crushed medications. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed in addition to medication administered, Resident #5 had an order for PreserVision AREDS (multivitamin with minerals) one tablet in the morning. On 06/26/25 at 8:03 A.M., LPN #100 verified she crushed extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility Payroll Based Journal information, facility assessment, staffing schedule information and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing levels were maintained to provide resident care and services. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents within the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data report for the third quarter (April 1 to June 30, 2024) revealed the facility had a one star staffing rating and low weekend staffing levels. The facility assessment with a reviewed date of 08/28/24 indicated a minimum staffing level plan of five to ten direct care nurses per day and seven to 14 State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) per day. The facility assessment indicated a daily average resident census of 71 to 78. Review of the facility staffing schedules for the dates of 05/10/24 to 05/12/24, 06/14/24 to 06/16/24 and 09/12/24 to 09/18/24 revealed the following dates and shift with low staffing levels: 05/12/24 (Sunday) census of 78 residents, dayshift one Registered Nurse (RN), four Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately. This affected four (Resident #11, #30, #52, and #53) of 27 records reviewed. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, sequelae of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, and depression. There was no evidence the resident diagnoses list included contractures. Review of Resident #30's Physical Therapy (PT) notes dated 01/22/24 revealed the resident had function limitation of the knee, hip, and ankle on the right lower extremity due to contractures. Review of Resident #30's range of motion (ROM) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had had full loss of voluntary movement of the legs including hip and knee, foot including ankle and toes on one side of the body. Review of Resident #30's current plan of care revealed the resident was at risk for decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure, cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, depression, and atrial fibrillation. On 09/04/24 Resident #35 had a weight of 225.9 pounds recorded. Review of a nursing note dated 09/30/24 at 11:49 A.M. indicated Resident #35 was seen by a nurse practitioner related to cough and chest discomfort. New orders were obtained for a chest x-ray and cardiology consult. An interdisciplinary team note dated 10/03/24 at 1:50 P.M. indicated Resident #35 was reviewed and had a cardiology appointment pending. On 10/10/24, a weight of 256.2 pounds was recorded. There was no further record of a cardiology appointment being made. Review of a dietary note dated 10/10/24 at 11:33 A.M. revealed Resident #35 was having an annual review completed. The note revealed the dietitian reviewed Resident #35 based on the weight obtained 09/04/24. The monthly weight was pending. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to restore bladder function and treat urinary tract infections (UTI) timely. This affected four (#3, #11, #44 and #52) of four residents reviewed for UTI's, and one (#57) resident reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and a history of urinary tract infections. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was moderately impaired for daily decision-making and had no urinary infections within the last 30 days. Review of the progress note (dated 03/02/24 at 1:03 P.M.) revealed Resident #3 complained of burning with urination and a foul smelling odor (with urination). Nurse Practitioner (NP) #901 ordered a urinalysis and culture to be obtained on 03/04/24. No progress notes were documented on 03/03/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical review, review of infection control log, interviews, observations, and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of antibiotics and/or assessment were completed accurately. This affected five (Resident #12, #41, #48, #52, and #57) of nine reviewed for urinary tract infection and unnecessary medication review. Findings include. 1.Medical record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, Parkinson's, aphasia, cognitive communication deficit, obstructive and reflux uropathy, malignant neoplasm of prostate, sleep terrors, attention and concentration deficit, dementia, major depression, anxiety, spinal stenosis, lower back pain, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, pulmonary embolism, constipation, and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. a. Review of Resident #52's orders and Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents call lights were readily assessable. This affected five residents (#47 Resident #3, #43, #48, #54) observed during the initial tour. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hunting disease, scoliosis, epilepsy, anxiety and depression. Observation on 10/21/24 at 4:11 P.M., revealed both of call lights in Resident #47's room were lying on the floor under the resident foot of bed. The resident was observed sitting in bed with back against the wall. There was a sign next to the door to remind the resident to use call light. Interview on 10/21/24 at 4:11 P.M., with the Administrator confirmed the call lights were on the floor. The Administrator placed the call lights next to the resident. Review of Resident #47's activity of daily living (ADL) deficit related to Huntington's plan of care dated 05/08/23 and revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of shower schedules, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing preferences were honored. This affected one (Resident #178) of 14 residents interviewed related to choices. Findings include: Review of Resident #178's medical record revealed diagnoses including left hip fracture, depression, and type two diabetes mellitus. An assessment for Preference for Everyday Living (PELI) dated 10/07/24 revealed it was somewhat important for Resident #178 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Resident #178 preferred a tub bath with no preference for bathing time. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #178 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #178 was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of an Interdisciplinary team (IDT) note dated 10/18/24 revealed Resident #178 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing. Review of shower schedules revealed Resident #178…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurate. This affected one (#59) of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction. Review of the medical record revealed no Advanced Directive form for review. Review of the Baseline Care Plan (dated [DATE]) revealed Resident #59 was a Full Code (a medical directive that indicates that a resident should receive all possible medical care to save their life in the event of a medical emergency). Review of Nurse Practitioner #901's History and Physical (dated [DATE]) revealed Resident #59 was a Full Code. Review of the electronic medical record, including the Physician Orders as of [DATE], indicated Resident #59 was a DNR-CCA (Do-Not-Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest which is a medical abbreviation that allows residents to receive aggressive interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive information was conveyed to the receiving health care provider and documented as such in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #52) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #52 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, attention and concentration deficit, dementia, major depression, anxiety, and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of Resident #52's census tab from 06/01/24 to 10/18/24 revealed the resident was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], 08/11/24, 09/26/24, and 10/13/24. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], however was not admitted to the hospital and returned to the facility. Further review of Resident #52's medical record revealed no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary of a resident stay was completed following discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #75) of one residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/02/24 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Further review of the medical record revealed on 08/16/24 Resident #75 was discharged to the assisted living facility connected to the facility. Review of the discharge summary revealed no evidence of completion by the nursing or dietary departments. On 10/28/24 at 10:41 A.M. interview with the Director of Nursing verified Resident #75's discharge summary was not completed thoroughly.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of shower schedules and interview, the facility failed to provide hygiene and/or grooming for three (Residents #29, #54, and #73) of 24 residents screened for hygiene/grooming. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed by diseases or toxins in the body), Parkinson's disease, fracture of the fourth metacarpal of the left hand, and neurocognitive disorder. A baseline care plan dated 09/18/24 indicated Resident #73 was to be assisted with bathing as needed. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #73 was usually understood and usually understood others. Resident #73 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. No rejection of care was documented. Resident #73 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing and partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. a. The medical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a decline in pressure ulcer was timely identified and adequately treated. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cognitive communication deficit, heart failure, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #15's current plan of care revealed the resident had pressure ulcers (left and right heel) related to mobility, dementia, edema, weakness, and chronic heart failure. Interventions included to monitor, document, and report to physician any changes in skin status (appearance, color, wound healing, signs and symptoms of infection and wound size). Notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown noted during bath or daily care. Review of Resident #15's pressure ulcer assessment dated [DATE] revealed the left heel was a stage I (intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent foot drop/contractures/limited range of motion. This affected two (Resident #30 and #59) of two residents reviewed for mobility/positioning. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including palliative care, encephalopathy, sequelae of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, and depression. There was no evidence the resident's diagnoses list included contractures. Review of Resident #30's Physical Therapy (PT) notes dated 01/22/24 revealed the resident had functional limitation of the knee, hip, and ankle on the right lower extremity due to contractures. Review of Resident #30's Occupation Therapy (OT) notes dated 01/20/24 to 01/26/24 revealed gentle passive range of motion (PROM) and stretching was completed to bilateral upper extremities to increase ROM and to decrease the risk for further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered and fall investigations were completed after a fall. This affected two (#3 and #54) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including coronary artery disease, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, anxiety disorder, depression and obsessive compulsive disorder. a. Review of the general note (dated 07/03/23) revealed a nurse had taken Resident #3 her breakfast tray and observed a dark purple/deep red bruise to her left eye. Resident #3 stated she fell out of bed and hit her face. Education was provided to the resident to utilize her call light and to ask for assistance. Review of the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Note dated 07/04/23 revealed Resident #3 reports she had a fall from bed. New intervention was a mat to the floor, on window side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were monitored for a resident who had significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #73) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, muscle wasting, neurocognitive disorder, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. A weight of 189.4 pounds was recorded on 09/20/24. A weight of 179.2 was recorded on 10/09/24 and 10/10/24. Review of a weight change note dated 10/10/24 at 12:49 P.M. indicated Resident #73 had a significant weight loss of 5% (10.2 pounds) in one month. Weight loss was likely due to fluid shifts from resolving edema. The note indicated Resident #73 would be added to the weekly weight list. No additional weights were located. On 10/23/24 at 12:30 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #541 provided a list of weekly weights dated 10/14/23 in which Resident 73's weight was recorded as 180.4. RN #541 verified the weight had been obtained on 10/23/24 as she was unable to locate a weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, policy review and manufacturer guideline review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per orders and respiratory equipment was stored properly. This affected two (Resident #15 and #229) residents of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including heart failure, asthma, and anxiety. Review of Resident #15 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident utilized oxygen therapy and had asthma or chronic lung disease. Review of Resident #15's oxygen orders dated 09/20/24 revealed the resident was ordered oxygen at three liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously for congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #15's progress note dated 09/20/23 revealed the resident arrived via ambulette on a stretcher with three liters oxygen continuous via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #15's altered respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered, obtain clarification regarding medication administration, and offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication ordered on an as needed basis. This affected two (Residents #29 and #178) of four residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed diagnoses including osteoarthritis and type two diabetes mellitus. A care plan initiated 10/04/23 indicated Resident #29 was at risk for pain related to arthritis, depression, migraines, generalized discomfort and diabetes mellitus. An intervention dated 10/04/23 provided instructions to administer pain medication as ordered. Resident #29 had orders for the administration of tylenol 650 milligrams four times a day dated 08/21/24. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed tylenol was not administered at midnight on 09/09/24 or 09/20/24 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop individualized comprehensive dementia care plans and policies related to dementia care. This affected one (#48) of one resident reviewed for dementia care. The census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and urosepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment (dated 09/24/24) revealed Resident #48 was moderately impaired for daily decision-making and was receiving antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. Review of the electronic Physician Orders (dated 09/17/24) included to administer risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.5 milligrams twice a day for dementia and Memantine (treats dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease) 10 mg twice a day for dementia. On 10/21/24, the diagnosis for the use of risperidone was changed to restlessness, yelling out and impulsiveness; however, there was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the pharmacist failed to identify irregularities in the medical record. This affected two (#3 and #48) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and urosepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment (dated 09/24/24) revealed Resident #48 was moderately impaired for daily decision-making and was receiving antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. a. Review of the Physician Order (dated 09/18/24) revealed to repeat a complete blood count and obtain Vitamin D level in one week. Review of the Lab Results Report (dated 09/23/24) revealed the following abnormal lab values: red blood cell 2.92 M/cmm (normal 3.9-5.4), hemoglobin 9.4 g/dL (normal 12-16), hematocrit 26.9% (normal 36-48) and Vitamin D25-OH Total 8 ng/mL (normal 30-100). Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, National Library of Medicine review and interview, the facility failed to address abnormal laboratory results. This affected one (Resident #48) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and urosepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment (dated 09/24/24) revealed Resident #48 was moderately impaired for daily decision-making. Review of the Physician Order (dated 09/18/24) revealed to repeat laboratory blood work including a CBC (complete blood count) and Vitamin D level in one week. Review of the Lab Results Report (dated 09/23/24) revealed the following abnormal lab values: red blood cell 2.92 M/cmm (normal 3.9-5.4), hemoglobin 9.4 g/dL (normal 12-16), hematocrit 26.9% (normal 36-48) and Vitamin D 25-OH Total 8 ng/mL (normal 30-100). Review of the medical record revealed no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving antipsychotic medications had adequate indications of use and behavioral interventions. This affected one (#48) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and urosepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment (dated 09/24/24) revealed Resident #48 was moderately impaired for daily decision-making and was receiving antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. Review of the electronic Physician Orders (dated 09/17/24) included to administer risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.5 milligrams twice a day for dementia. On 10/21/24, the diagnosis for the use of risperidone was changed to administer risperidone for restlessness, yelling out and impulsiveness. Review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were placed in contact isolation precautions as indicated. This affected one (Resident #78) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for respite care (discharged from hospice on 05/07/24 to skilled services) with a diagnosis including malignant neoplasm of brain, anxiety, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, delirium, insomnia, hemiplegia, hypertension, chronic ischemic heart disease, weakness, chronic ischemic heart disease, history of malignant neoplasm of the breast, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the emergency room report dated 05/23/24 revealed the resident was seen for hypokalemia (low potassium level) and decubitus skin ulcer. The female was a resident of a local skilled nursing facility who presents to the emergency room from the cancer center due to abnormal las. During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to provide comprehensive, resident centered care related to edema and congestive heart failure. This affected one (Resident #24) of three records reviewed. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson's Disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), cardiomegaly, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed no evidence the resident had behaviors including refusal of care. Review of Resident #24's current plan of care for congestive heart failure revealed no evidence to encourage the resident to elevate their lower extremities while sitting or in bed. Interventions included to monitor/document/report as needed any signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure (dependent edema of legs and feet and weight gain unrelated to intakes). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #78 within 30 days of admission. The facility failed to ensure adequate interventions and treatment were in place to promote healing and prevent deterioration of the ulcer. This affected one resident (#78) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 74. Findings included: Review of Resident #78's hospice plan certification documentation dated 04/29/24 revealed skilled nursing to provide teaching related to altered skin integrity to include offloading, frequent position changes, keep skin clean and dry to prevent skin breakdown, and minimize friction and shearing. Medical equipment supplied gel mattress overlay. The resident was bedbound and able to bear weight. The resident received assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLS) except for eating.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use was appropriate and criteria was met for the treatment of infections. This affected one resident (Resident #78) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for respite care (discharged from hospice on 05/07/24 to skilled services) with a diagnosis including malignant neoplasm of brain, anxiety, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, delirium, insomnia, hemiplegia, hypertension, chronic ischemic heart disease, weakness, chronic ischemic heart disease, history of malignant neoplasm of the breast, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the emergency room report dated 05/23/24 revealed the resident was seen for hypokalemia and decubitus skin ulcer. The female was a resident of a local skilled nursing facility who presents to the emergency room from the cancer center due to abnormal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment to a non-pressure related skin issue as ordered by the advanced level provider. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: A review of Resident #5's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD), peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #5's care plans revealed she had an active care plan in place for a friction abrasion on her right great toe and left middle toe. The care plan was initiated on 11/25/23. The interventions included keeping the skin clean and dry and to monitor/ document the location, size, and treatment of skin injury. The interventions did not include the need to provide any treatments as ordered. A review of Resident #5's Skin Grid for Non-Pressure assessments dated 11/25/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels to provide bathing for residents. This affected five residents (Residents #2, #16, #52, #56 and #278) of five residents reviewed for bathing with the potential to affect all 69 residents. The facility census was 69. Findings include: On 05/07/23 at 8:30 A.M. the survey team entered the facility to conduct the annual survey. There were four licensed nurses and one State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) on duty to provide care for 69 residents currently residing in the facility. 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of the shower schedules for the North Hall (100 hall) revealed Resident #2 was to received showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Review of Resident #2's scheduled bathing documentation in STNA documentation from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at appropriate temperatures. This had the potential to affect all but one resident (Resident #4) identified as not receiving nutritional services from the dietary department. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Interview with Resident #124 on 05/07/23 at 11:29 A.M. revealed concerns with cold food served by the facility. Test tray and food service observation on 05/09/23 revealed the following: The main course served was turkey ala king. 11:58 A.M., food tray line began in the kitchen with North Unit first cart. 12:05 P.M., test tray prepared and placed onto the North Unit cart first cart. 12:06 P.M., North Unit first cart out of the kitchen and delivered to the North Unit. 12:08 P.M., North Unit first cart arrived to the North Unit. 12:12 P.M., two staff members begin passing meal trays. 12:32 P.M., two resident meal trays (Residents #9 and #38) and test tray left in North Unit 1st cart. 12:33 P.M., staff begin passing meals trays from North Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly secured inside the dumpster and not lying on the ground outside the dumpster. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 05/07/23 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:15 A.M. revealed two bags of trash lying on the ground next to the dumpster outside of the kitchen. Interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) #166 on 05/07/23 at 9:13 A.M. verified trash is not to be outside the dumpster and should be placed within the dumpster. Review of the facility policy Housekeeping with a review date of 04/18 indicated the dumpster are is to be kept clean at all times, free of debris, rodents and standing water.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when the COVID-19 county transmission level was high, failed to maintain Resident #21's urine bag off the floor, failed to ensure ice scoops during ice pass on the North Hall (100 hall) were placed in a sanitary location when not in use, failed to ensure a nurse did not handle medications with her bare hands, and failed to ensure residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions had appropriate PPE for staff to wear when providing care. This affected four residents (Resident #21, #62, #66 and #224) observed for infection control procedures and had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility Findings included: 1. Observation on 05/07/23 at 8:30 A.M. upon entrance into the facility of signage at front entry revealing the COVID-19 county transmission level was high and staff were to wear masks and eye protection. Observation on 05/07/23 at 8:32 A.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled and per resident preference. This affected five Residents (#2, #16, #52, #56, and #278) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 69. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified heart failure, essential hypertension and chronic gout. Review of Resident #2's annual MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 08/10/22, revealed it was very important for her to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Review of Resident #2's plan of care, dated 08/12/21, revealed her hygiene preference was a shower and the resident would maintain cleanliness. Interventions included offer shave and nail trim on shower days and as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident wishes for life saving procedures were clearly designated in the medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #31) of 31 residents reviewed for advance directives. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, multiple sclerosis, history of traumatic brain injury, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression. A plan of care dated 09/17/20 indicated Resident #31 was a full code (the facility staff will provide emergent measures in an attempt to resuscitate the resident. It may involve chest compressions, electrical shocks, and emergency medications that act to temporarily keep blood moving to essential organs). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #31 was cognitively intact. A physician order dated 04/18/23 indicated a code status of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) (permits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #59 was invited to participate in care plan conferences and failed to ensure the resident's activity interests had not changed since admission and the activity program provided was meeting the resident's individual needs. This affected one resident (Resident #59) of two residents reviewed for involvement in care planning. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy (diabetic kidney disease), sleep apnea, hypertension, and depression. a. On 05/07/23 at 11:28 A.M., Resident #59 stated she had not been informed of any care plan/conference meetings. Documentation revealed a care conference was held 08/18/22 with Resident #59 and responsible party attending. A care conference was held 11/09/22 with the responsible party attending. There was no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure activities were provided on the weekends to meet the resident needs. This affected one resident (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/25/19 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, weakness, attention and concentration deficit, and tremors. Review of Resident #9's plan of care, dated 07/09/19, revealed she was at risk for a decline in her activities of daily living function related to decreased mobility, weakness, and tremors. Interventions included provide physical assistance with oral hygiene and teeth brushing due to tremors. Review of Resident #9's plan of care, dated 07/19/19, revealed she had an alteration in activity participation related to behaviors, impaired decision making, and impaired mobility. She needed assistance to activities. Interventions included arrange for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medication use was appropriate. This affected three residents (Resident #19, #21 and #67) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19 medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including encephalopathy and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #19 physician medication listing revealed Resident #19 was ordered on admission [DATE]) Aricept (cognition enhancing medication) 5 milligrams (mg) daily for dementia and Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily for dementia with behaviors which include aggression, hitting, and yelling. On 01/21/23 the physician attempted a gradual dose reduction for Seroquel, decreasing the dosage to 12.5 mg twice daily for dementia with behaviors. Further review revealed no physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, medication information review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was not greater than five percent. Two medication errors out of 25 opportunities were observed resulting in an eight percent medication error rate. This affected two (Residents #4 and #16) of seven residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. On 05/08/23 at 11:07 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #107 was observed administering medication to Resident #16. One and one half tablets of Simethicone (used to relieve symptoms of gas) 80 milligrams (mg) was administered for a total of 120 mg. Review of the physician orders revealed simethicone 125 mg every six hours. LPN #107 verified she was administering 120 mg of simethicone as she prepared the medication prior to administration. Review of the facility's policy, Administration and Documentation of Medications (revised October 2022), revealed prior to and during administration, the nurse must observe the right dose was administered by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-11-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHM OH WEST OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/28/2021
OHIO CARE SKLD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/28/2021
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 8%Other / private 53%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$271per resident / day
operating cost
$8,238per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$283per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365696. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next