No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Healthcare At Cedar Hill

1136 Adair Avenue, Zanesville, OH 43701 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (740) 454-6823 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$30,227 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $30,227 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-30)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
800 Forest Ave · (740) 454-5047 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
751 Forest Ave Ste 302 · (740) 455-7545 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
302 N State St · (740) 454-0136 · Call to confirm hours
Park
859 Keen St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.5%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.871.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.491.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.8%CMS range 43.7–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.8–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.4–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
38.3%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 76.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-23)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of a facility fall investigation, hospital record review, review of the facility Fall policy and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident #78 adequate assistance for transferring/ambulation with toileting to prevent a fall with major injury. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on [DATE] when Resident #78, who was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation status post hospitalization for a left total knee replacement (on [DATE]) and who was assessed to be at moderate risk for falls sustained a fall while being assisted by one State Tested Nursing Assistant, (STNA) #176 to walk from her bed to the bathroom. The resident was subsequently assessed to have dislocation to her knee (replacement) and a popliteal artery injury (an injury mainly associated with high energy injury, including knee dislocation with causes including falls and crush injuries) requiring a left above the knee amputation. The resident did not return to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, policy review, facility investigation review and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent a resident fall with major injury. Actual Harm occurred on 06/24/24 when Resident #14, who was identified as a fall risk, was hit by a dietary cart (used to transport resident meal trays) that was being steered by Dietary [NAME] #20, causing the resident to fall and sustain a right hip fracture. The resident was emergently transported to the hospital and admitted for surgical intervention to repair the right hip fracture. This affected one resident (#14) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included femur fracture, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Care Plan, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received specialized therapy services as written in the plan of care. This affected one resident (#60) of three residents reviewed for specialized therapy services. The census was 77.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra, unspecified dementia, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, anxiety and difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified. Review of the Physical Therapy (PT): Plan of Treatment and Orders revealed therapy services were initiated on 08/21/25. The PT plan of treatment certification periods included 09/19/25 through 10/18/25; 10/15/25 through 11/13/25, 11/14/25 through 12/06/25, and 12/06/25 through 01/04/26. The services were to be provided three to five times a week for therapeutic exercises, therapeutic activities, neuromuscular reeducation, and gait…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #54 received necessary services to maintain good oral hygiene. This affected one (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 71. Findings include:Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on his feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #54's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. He was not known to display any behaviors, nor was he known to reject care. He was coded as being dependent on staff for oral hygiene. He was indicated to be edentulous with no natural teeth or tooth fragments noted. Review of Resident #54's care plans revealed he had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow physician orders to apply ice packs several times a day to the left knee of Resident #72 who was status post left total knee replacement. This affected one (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for admission and post-surgical physician orders. The facility census was 71. Findings Include:Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 10/16/25 after having a left total knee replacement on 10/13/25. Resident #72's diagnoses included diabetes, anemia, heart disease, high blood pressure and gastric reflux.Review of the initial nursing assessment completed on 10/16/25 revealed Resident #72 had a brief interview for mental status score of 14/15, meaning the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #72 was dependent for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the facility in good repair and maintain a home like environment. This affected 12 of 41 resident rooms currently occupied by residents in the facility. The resident census was 70.Findings Include: On 09/18/25 tour of the facility between 9:50 A.M. and 10:20 A.M. the following environmental issues were observed: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] behind the bed by the window, the wall was gouged and the paint peeling.2. room [ROOM NUMBER] the wall was patched and not painted in multiple places.3. room [ROOM NUMBER], 105 and 201 the ceiling was peeling and hanging down.4. room [ROOM NUMBER] by the bathroom door and corner by the dresser was gouged and scraped.5. The wallpaper was torn on both sides of the door by room [ROOM NUMBER].6. Between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] the wallpaper was torn.7. room [ROOM NUMBER] the wall behind and beside the bed had gouges in multiple places.8. Baseboard was missing in the hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store perishable items under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. All residents were identified as receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observations of the walk in freezer on 01/21/25 at 8:18 A.M. revealed several undated/unlabeled items which were later identified by Dietary [NAME] #205 as follows: four bags of hash browns removed from their original packaging and now stored in a two-gallon plastic storage bags, a bag of tater tots removed from their original packaging which had been opened and were now stored in a two-gallon plastic storage bag, one bag of chicken tenders removed from their original packaging and now stored in a two-gallon plastic storage bag, three bags of frozen drumsticks removed from their original packaging and now stored in two-gallon plastic storage bags, five bags of Hawaiian rolls and two of which had been previously opened, one previously opened bag of cinnamon rolls which were stuck…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the shower cleaning sheets, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary shower room. This affected all 45 residents (#3, #7, #11, #13, #14, #15, #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #25, #26, #27, #30, #35, #36, #40, #41, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #49, #52, #59, #61, #62, #63, #64, #67, #69, #72, #73, #75, #79, #232, #233, #234, #236, #237, #282, #332, and #334) residing on the east wing of the facility who utilized the facility's shower room. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 01/21/25 at 11:40 A.M. of the facility's East Wing shower room revealed the room hosted two shower stalls. One stall was clear while the other stall hosted several shower chairs. Along the shower wall of the second shower stall was a moderate amount of green residue. Review of the Shower Cleaning Sheet revealed housekeeping staff were to clean shower rooms on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The cleaning involved cleaning the sink, stocking soap and paper towels, disinfecting the tub, sweeping and mopping the floors, cleaning the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide unopened mail for Resident #41. This affected one resident (#41) out of one resident reviewed for privacy. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, heart disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, conduct disorder, chronic osteomyelitis, heart failure, major depressive disorder, dementia, suicidal ideation, depression, and hypertension. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 09/06/24 revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15. Resident #41 had no impairment of functional range of motion in upper or lower extremities and reported no pain and received no pain medication. Review of Resident #41's admission agreement dated 02/20/19 revealed he wished to receive his mail unopened. Interview on 01/21/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to correctly identify Resident #52's psychotropic diagnosis on a significant change Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form. This affected one resident (#52) out of one resident sampled for PASRR. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/29/23 and diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #52's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered Celexa 40 milligrams (mg) in the morning for yelling out/restlessness, Depakote Delayed Release 125 mg three times daily for bipolar disorder, and Lorazepam 2 mg/milliliter (ml) with instructions to administer 0.5 ml every four hours as needed for anxiety/agitation for 90 days. Review of Resident #52's care plan dated 10/13/23 revealed the resident utilized psychotropic medications related to bipolar disorder with interventions to monitor for target…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was provided the opportunity to participate in and attend his quarterly care conference meeting. This affected one (Resident #32) out of six residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date for 03/27/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two, retention of urine, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #32's Interdisciplinary Care Conference Summary dated 12/16/24 revealed no signatures were present on the form, indicating the interdisciplinary team (IDT) members and the resident were not present for the meeting. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 01/21/25 at 1:02 P.M. Resident #32 revealed he had not had a care plan meeting since his admission to the facility (March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to a significant weight loss for Resident #17. This affected one (Resident #17) of six residents (Resident #1, #12, #17, #32, #57, and #134) reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 85 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan dated 07/30/24 revealed Resident #17's had a nutritional problem or a potential nutritional problem related to chronic disease, was at risk for malnutrition, and was using a mechanically altered diet and thickened liquids. The interventions included to monitor and record signs and symptoms of malnutrition, including significant weight loss of over five percent (%) in one month, the dietitian was to evaluate and make diet change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy/procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary living environment. This affected one resident (#68) of three residents reviewed for a sanitary living environment. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Observations on 05/29/24 at 10:30 A.M. and 10:45 A.M. revealed mouse droppings in a basket in Resident #68's bedroom. The basket had personal items in it, as well as a box of snack cakes (each individual cake was sealed). Resident #68 was admitted to the facility 11/24/22 with diagnoses including type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vascular dementia, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty walking, dysphagia, cerebral aneurysm, autonomic neuropathy, insomnia, ventral hernia, hyperlipidemia, depression, obesity, atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/01/24, revealed Resident #68 was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident #68 on 05/29/24 at 10:35 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, interview, record review and facility investigation review the facility failed to prevent Resident #20 from exiting the facility without staff assistance. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 80. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date on 06/09/23. Diagnosis included unspecified dementia, anxiety, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #20's physician order dated 06/26/23 revealed the resident had a wanderguard (a magnetized fob that is placed on the wrist or ankle to alert staff when a resident is exiting an alarmed door) placed on her ankle and for placement to be checked every shift. Review of Resident #20's Care Plan revealed the resident was a risk for elopement related to impaired cognition, wandering, a history of attempting to leave the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review for food storage and hand hygiene, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored and meal trays were prepared in a sanitary manner. This affected all residents residing in the facility at this time. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 07/10/23 at 8:11 A.M. revealed during initial tour of the kitchen, there were bags of food located in the walk-in freezer that was not properly sealed. There was one bag of breaded chicken tenders, one bag of tater tots, and one bag of french fries. All three bags were noted to be open with the food exposed to the open air. Interview on 07/10/23 at 8:50 A.M. with Dietary Manager #342 confirmed the three open bags of food. Dietary Manager #342 also confirmed any food stored in the freezer needed to be properly sealed to protect the food from the freezer air. Review of facility's policy titled Food Storage, revised 09/08/2021 revealed, all food stock and products are stored in NSF approved sanitary storage container, of food quality plastic bags, covered,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the clean laundry room, which had a gas powered dryer, had a carbon monoxide detector. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 07/13/23 at 8:30 A.M. of the clean laundry room revealed there were two dryers, one electric powered and one gas powered. Further observation revealed no carbon monoxide detector in the laundry room. Interview on 07/13/23 at 8:40 A.M. with Housekeeping Staff #347 revealed she had never seen a carbon monoxide detector in the clean laundry room with the gas dryer. Interview on 07/13/23 at 9:00 A.M. with Maintenance Staff #418 verified the UniMac dryer was a gas powered dryer and there was no carbon monoxide detector in the room. He also verified there should be a carbon monoxide detector in the room, and he didn't know how he missed it. Review of the facility Carbon Monoxide Detector Monitoring Log revealed there was no carbon monoxide detector in the laundry room with the gas dryer.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 was treated with dignity and respect. This affected one resident (#42) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 77. Findings included: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, lymphedema, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/02/23, revealed she was cognitively independent. Observation on 07/10/23 at 11:06 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. and 07/11/23 at 8:11 A.M. revealed a paper sign on Resident #42's door stating, (resident's proper name) has right arm lymphedema and cannot have blood pressure taken or blood drawn from this arm! (Resident's proper name) also has a port in her chest from previous chemotherapy. Please be careful not to bump! Thank you!. Observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the use of antipsychotic medication or reflected the contraindication for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for that antipsychotic. This affected two residents (Resident #42, and #50) of the 20 residents reviewed for accurate MDS. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/22/2020. Diagnosis included Alzheimer disease, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and mood affective disorder. Review of Resident #42's physician orders revealed a order dated 12/2020 for Perphenazine (antipsychotic) 2 milligrams (mg) twice a day for bipolar disorder. Review of the plan of care dated 01/03/2021 and revised 10/31/2022 revealed Resident #42 was at risk of adverse reactions related to depression, the use of psychoactive medications, and an affective mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy for preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure a new PASRR was submitted for residents with a new mental health diagnosis. This affected two residents (Resident #38, and #23) of the two residents reviewed for accurate PASRR assessments. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 05/22/2019. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, protein-calorie malnutrition, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Review of Resident #38's most recently completed PASRR dated 06/17/2019 revealed under Section D, indications of serious mental illness, the diagnosis schizophrenia was the only diagnosis marked for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was on fluid restriction had fluid intake monitored and documented. This affected one Resident (#24) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 77. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, essential hypertension, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/10/23, revealed she was slightly cognitively impaired and had active diagnoses of renal insufficiency, renal failure and end stage renal disease. Further review revealed she was independent with setup help only for eating. Review of Resident #24's MDS timeline revealed she was out of the facility from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was receiving hemodialysis was assessed prior to and upon return from dialysis and there was communication between the facility and the dialysis center. This affected one resident (#24) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 77. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, essential hypertension, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/10/23, revealed she was slightly cognitively impaired and had active diagnoses of renal insufficiency, renal failure and end stage renal disease. Further review revealed she received dialysis prior to and while being a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not prescribed prior to receiving lab testing results and prescribed appropriately according to lab testing results. This affected one (Resident #23) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/19/23 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident with hemiplegia and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Resident #23's progress notes revealed on 04/27/23 the resident was transferred to the local emergency room (ER) for evaluation. Resident #23 returned to the facility on [DATE] after ER evaluation with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) and new orders for cefdinir (antibiotic) 300 milligrams (mg) twice daily for seven days. A urinalysis with culture and sensitivity was obtained at the ER during evaluation. The urinalysis with culture and sensitivity was completed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 75 of 75 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. On 05/10/21 9:45 A.M. initial tour revealed the deep fryer with fried food particles on outside of fryer. 2. On 05/12/21 at 10:29 A.M. upon entering the kitchen to observe puree, [NAME] #7 removed her gloves, put on new gloves without washing her hands and then pulled up her uniform pants. [NAME] #7 used her gloved hands to place chicken in blender. After pureeing, she took the dirty dishes to dirty side and removed her gloves and put on new ones without washing her hands and pureed the noodles. Again, [NAME] #7 took dirty dishes over and placed on a cart, removed her gloves and again put on new ones without washing her hands. [NAME] #7 again touched her uniform pulling top down. [NAME] #7 then placed mixed vegetables in blender and used gloved hand to scrape out vegetables left in pan after dumping. On 05/12/21 at 10:55 A.M. this was verified during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately in the areas of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), hearing, activities and skin/ ulcer treatments. This affected five (Resident #39, #41, #44, #46 and #51) of 21 residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: 1 (a.). A review of Resident #39's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizophrenia, dementia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #39's PASRR review dated 09/09/16 revealed the resident did not have any indications of a serious mental illness as of the date the PASRR was completed. The PASRR identification screen for Section (D.), which was for marking diagnoses for indications of serious mental illness revealed schizophrenia was not marked at that time as a diagnosis the resident was known to have. There was no evidence of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-18 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure new Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) were completed for residents who had a newly diagnosed serious mental illness added to their diagnoses. This affected five (Resident #39, #41, #44, #46 and #54) of five residents reviewed for PASRR's. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #39's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia and schizophrenia. The diagnosis of schizophrenia was added on 12/27/18. A review of Resident #39's PASRR dated 09/09/16 revealed the resident did not have any indications of a serious mental illness at the time the PASRR was completed. A PASRR identification screen that was completed as part of the PASRR revealed the assessor was to check any indications of a serious mental illness under Section (D.) A mood disorder was marked as the only diagnosis the resident had at the time the screen was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, family interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #16, #39, #51 and #53) received quarterly care conferences as required and care plans were revised for two residents (Resident #26 and #41) in the area of activities. Four residents were reviewed for care conferences and 21 residents were reviewed for care plan revision. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of a CVA (stroke), adult onset diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension and congestive heart failure. A review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 02/05/21 revealed the resident did not have any communication issues. He was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. He was cognitively intact and was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide each resident an ongoing activity program to support their preferences and choices. This affected six (Residents #4, #14, #26, #41, #44, and #46) of seven resident investigated for activities. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition, hallucinations and insomnia. Further review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of two or more staff members for toileting and dressing. Review of the activity documentation log revealed for 02/21 two independent activities and two one to one activities, 03/21 two group activities, 04/21 two independent and one group activity, and 05/21 as of 05/12/21 one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity during dining. This affected one (Resident #25) of three residents observed in the East lobby. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral vascular accident and dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was severely impaired for daily decision-making and was dependent on staff for eating. On 05/10/21 at 11:56 A.M., observation of the lunch meal revealed Resident #25 was at the nurses station seated in a specialized wheelchair while State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #47 stood next to her and fed the resident her lunch. On 05/10/21 at 12:03 P.M., the Administrator walked onto the unit and asked STNA #47 to sit in a chair while feeding residents. The Administrator approached the surveyor and stated she would start educating staff not to stand while feeding residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the family of a significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident investigated for notification of change. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition, hallucinations and insomnia. Further review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of two or more staff members for toileting and dressing. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 on 01//08/21 weighed 153.8 pounds. On 02/23/21 weight was 132.2 pounds. On 04/14/21 weight was 126.6 pounds and on 05/03/21 128 pounds. Resident #4 received a regular diet with ice cream for lunch and dinner, house supplement three times a day, house…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of liability notices, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were discharged from Medicare (MCR) Part A services and remained in the facility received the appropriate notices to inform them of their right to appeal the decision and continue to receive the skilled service. They also failed to ensure another resident was given the appropriate 48 hour notice prior to the end of his skilled service. This affected three (Resident #39, #64 and #169) of three residents reviewed for liability notices. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #39's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of a stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, adult onset diabetes mellitus, dementia, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. A review of Resident #39's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form revealed the start date for the resident's MCR Part A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans for residents included care plans to address urinary incontinence, hearing impairment and pressure ulcers. This affected three (Resident #12, #26 and #39) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #12's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of a stroke, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, hypertension and hypertensive chronic kidney disease with end stage renal disease. A review of Resident #12's last continence assessment completed 04/30/20 revealed the resident was known to be occasionally incontinent of her bladder. She was determined to have functional incontinence as a result of the assessment and was on a toileting program in which she was to be toileted upon rising, before meals, at bedtime and as needed. A review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for a resident who was discharged from the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #69) of two closed records reviewed for discharge. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cancer of the brain, major depression, epilepsy, anxiety and adult failure to thrive. Review of her quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed her cognition was moderately impaired. She required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene and supervision with set up help for dressing. Further review revealed Resident #69 was discharged from the facility on 04/06/21 to another facility. There was no documented evidence the facility had completed a discharge summary that reflected the residents's stay at the facility. On 05/17/21 at 11:28 A.M. interview with Registered Nurse #31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received set up help and had the necessary supplies to perform his own oral hygiene care. This affected one (Resident #16) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (adl's). Findings include: A review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adult onset diabetes mellitus, abnormalities of his gait and mobility, weakness, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and congestive heart failure. A review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues. He was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. He was not noted to have any behaviors nor was he known to reject care. He required supervision with no set up help for transfers. Supervision with set up help only was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activity of daily living services for residents unable to do for themselves. This affected three (Residents #10, #26 and #268) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, anemia and nicotine abuse. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition is severely impaired. He requires supervision with personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 11/06/20 revealed he is non-compliant with refusing personal care. On 05/11/21 1:30 P.M. observation revealed long fingernails with a dark substance caked under them. On 05/12/21 at 12:09 P.M. the fingernails remain long with dark substance caked under them. There was no documentation of refusal of care for these days. This was verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide evidence that bruising to a resident's hands were assessed and care provided. This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for skin conditions. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition, hallucinations and insomnia. Further review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of two or more staff members for toileting and dressing. Observation on 05/11/21 at 9:19 A.M. revealed bruising to the bilateral top of his hands. On 05/12/21 at 10:10 A.M. interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #120 verified the lack of documentation for the bruising in the medical record and she was not aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was routinely offered her hearing aids to improve her hearing ability. This affected one (Resident #39) of two residents reviewed for vision/ hearing. Findings include: A review of Resident #39's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of a stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, dementia and schizophrenia. Record review revealed she had an audiogram completed on 08/03/17 from [NAME] Hearing Aid Center. Puretone average right was 50 and left was 53. A certificate of medical necessity/ prescription for hearing aids revealed the hearing aid evaluation supported the consumer's need for a hearing aid. Digital/ programmable hearing aid would offer superior performance over a conventional hearing aid for the specific consumer. A review of a certificate of medical necessity/ prescription for hearing aids revealed Resident #39…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition, hallucinations and insomnia. Further review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of two or more staff members for toileting and dressing. Review of the physicians orders revealed bed by the wall, review of the plan of care dated 02/08/21 revealed bed stabilizers, lock bed, grip strips bedside bed, non-skid socks , offer activities when sitting in the lounge. Resident #4's fall assessment completed 05/01/21 revealed he was at high risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was routinely assessed and evaluated for the need for a toileting program to help restore as much normal bladder function as possible to reduce incontinence episodes. This affected one (Resident #12) of one residents reviewed for bladder incontinence. Findings include: A review of Resident #12's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia without behaviors, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of a stroke, chronic kidney disease and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of Resident #12's physician's orders revealed no evidence of the resident being on any scheduled toileting plan. She was not on any diuretics or medications for the treatment of an overactive bladder. A review of Resident #12's continence assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did use the toilet but was also known to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents oxygen tubing was being changed weekly in accordance with orders/ facility policy and failed to ensure a resident received humidified oxygen as ordered. This affected two (Resident #16 and #41) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen level in the blood), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sleep apnea and congestive heart failure. A review of Resident #16's physician's orders included the use of oxygen at 2 to 4 liters per minute per nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The orders also included the need to change the oxygen tubing every night shift on Thursdays. A review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, the facility failed to assist with obtaining guardianship. This affected one (Resident #4) of one reviewed for medically related social services. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition, hallucinations and insomnia. Further review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of two or more staff members for toileting and dressing. On 05/12/21 at 5:01 P.M. interview with family revealed they have asked the facility and they are not helping with guardianship. No family member wants the responsibility and family have asked them and the facility have him as his own responsible party. On 05/13/21 at 10:18 A.M. interview with Social Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological intervention were attempted prior to administering psychotropic medications. This affected one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition, hallucinations and insomnia. Further review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of two or more staff members for toileting and dressing. Review of the physician's orders revealed orders dated for Ativan 2 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours when needed for agitation and Haldol 5 mg IM (intramuscularly) every four hours as needed not to exceed 20 mg in 24 hour period related to manic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable infection control practices were followed in regard to hand washing between glove changes during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #26) of one residents observed for dressing changes. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disease, anxiety disorder and schizophrenia. Review of the Pressure ulcer assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had a Stage III left trochanter facility-acquired pressure ulcer with treatment orders to cleanse the left hip wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply Dakins moist gauze, lightly pack and cover with an ABD pad. On 05/11/21 between 1:42 P.M. and 1:50 P.M., Resident #26's left trochanter pressure ulcer treatment was observed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #120 opened the dressing change supplies and placed them on the mattress at the end of the bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$30,227 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $13,076 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
  • $17,151 — penalty dated 2024-01-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHM OH WEST OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/28/2021
OHIO CARE SKLD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/28/2021
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 3%Other / private 22%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$262per resident / day
operating cost
$7,951per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366286. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next