No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Healthcare At Beckett House

1280 Friendship Drive, New Concord, OH 43762 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (740) 826-7649 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 826-7649 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited May 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$44,060 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $44,060 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-25)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7297 Glenn Hwy · (740) 435-7777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10 E Main St · (740) 826-4000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
168 W Main St · (740) 826-7721 · Call to confirm hours
Park
179 Montgomery Blvd · (740) 826-6109 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1390 Friendship Dr · (740) 826-4479

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%12.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.721.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.551.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.2%CMS range 40.5–64.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.2–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.8–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
36.6%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 70.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-12)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23 received adequate care for treatment of an urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#23) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. Facility census was 57. Actual harm occurred on 02/03/24 when Resident #23, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and cognitive impairment, exhibited signs of an urinary tract infection including dark, cloudy urine without evidence of timely identification or treatment of the infection. On 02/07/24 at 10:45 P.M. (four days later) the resident was assessed to have an elevated temperature of 102.3 degrees Fahrenheit with altered mental status. The resident was transferred to the emergency room and subsequently admitted with a diagnosis of sepsis with acute metabolic encephalopathy due to acute urinary tract infection/acute pyelonephritis. The resident was hospitalized for three days. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was provided adequate assistance during a transfer to the toilet to prevent an injury. Actual Harm occurred on 04/07/22 when Resident #48, who was assessed to require two staff for transfers and toileting was lowered to the floor while being assisted by only one staff member resulting in a displaced fracture of the left femur/hip. The resident was hospitalized as a result of the injury and required surgical repair of the fracture. This affected one Resident (#48) of three residents reviewed for accidents and falls. Findings include: A review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22 with diagnoses including right above the knee amputation, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorder, and hypertension. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility from home because of difficulty with caring for herself. A pre-admission referral document, dated 03/25/22 included a progress note (dated 03/01/22)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility assessment review, job description review, staff schedule review and interview the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was scheduled for eight consecutive hours, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 73.Findings include:Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed Registered Nurses (RNs) are part of nursing services and are needed to provide support and care for facility residents.Review of the nursing services schedule revealed there was not an RN scheduled for 05/23/26. In an interview on 06/15/26 at 11:00 A.M. the Administrator verified there was not an RN scheduled/who worked on 05/23/26.Review of the Registered Nurse Employee Job description, revised 09/01/25, revealed the primary purpose of the RN job position was to provide direct nursing care to residents and to supervise day-to-day nursing activities. Further review revealed RN job duties include directing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment. This had the potential to affect 73 of 73 residents in the facility. Findings include:Observations on 06/15/26 from 8:27 A.M. to 8:38 A.M. during the initial tour of the facility revealed in the sunroom at the end of each hallway there were dust accumulations and dead bugs on the floors along the edges of the walls. Observations and interview on 06/15/26 at 4:09 P.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #200 revealed in sunrooms at the end of each hallway there was an accumulation of dust and dead bugs as well as behind all fire doors on each hall. HS #200 confirmed findings. Review of a policy titled Housekeeping Policy dated 11/2025 revealed the facility will be cleaned on a regular basis. The hallway floors are to be clean and dry, corners and edges of the floor are to be clean and free of wax buildup. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 3024730.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all residents seated at the same table were served their meals at the same time, leaving one resident without food while the other residents ate their meal. This affected one (#29) of three residents reviewed for dining. The facility census was 73. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #29 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, and anxiety disorder.Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29's cognition was intact.Observation of the lunch meal in the dining room on 06/16/26 starting at 11:32 A.M. revealed Resident #29 was seated at a table with five other residents. Each of the other five residents were served their lunch meals and Resident #29 was not. After serving Resident #29's table, three other tables, located in the dining room, were given their meals for a total of 15 residents being served before Resident #29.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for behaviors and dementia care for Resident #28. This affected one resident (#28) of two reviewed for a facility reported incident. The facility census was 73.Findings include:Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/25 and diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, other symptoms and signs involving appearance and behavior (aggressive behaviors), COPD, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #28's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of five indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #28 utilized a walker and a wheelchair for mobility, was independent with bed mobility, required supervision with transfers, partial/moderate assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Food and Drug Administration Medication Information review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications. This affected on resident (#28) of two reviewed for a facility reported incident. The facility census was 73.Findings include:Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/25 and diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, other symptoms and signs involving appearance and behavior (aggressive behaviors), COPD, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #28's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of five indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #28 utilized a walker and a wheelchair for mobility, was independent with bed mobility, required supervision with transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct texture diet. This affected one (#6) of three residents observed for correct diet texture. The facility census was 73. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other sequelae of other cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, and anxiety disorder.Review of an order dated 10/10/25 revealed Resident #6 required a regular diet with mechanical soft texture, thin liquids, a divided scoop plate, and a spout cup.Review of a care plan dated 12/04/25 revealed Resident #6 had a nutritional problem or potential nutrition problem related to cerebrovascular disease, dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, a mechanically altered diet, and hospice services. The goal was for Resident #6 to tolerate the least restrictive diet texture without difficulties. Interventions included but were not limited to determine likes and dislikes and provide diet as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all resident rooms were maintained at a comfortable temperature. This affected seven (#2, #3, #4, #6, #7, #10, and #12) of 13 residents reviewed for heating concerns, and had the potential to affect 13 of 13 residents reviewed for heating concerns. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and difficulty in walking. Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyneuropathy and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including myocardial infarction and acute respiratory failure. Record review revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI), the facility failed to provide care and services to assist a dependent resident with activities of daily living (ADL) and the resident was identified to have maggots in her hair. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility census was 76.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an initial admission date of 01/19/23 and a readmission date of 11/04/25. Resident #11 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified, seborrheic dermatitis, and cellulitis of head. Review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Observation on 06/09/25 at 12:13 P.M. of Resident #42 and #224's room revealed a dark yellow orange stain in front of toilet, two broken linoleum with a raised uneven floor by Resident #42's chair and one broken linoleum in bathroom and two going into bathroom. Observation on 06/09/25 at 12:17 P.M. of Resident #68's room revealed the drywall was damaged between her chair and side table. Observation on 06/09/25 at 12:19 P.M. of Resident #65's room revealed five cracked linoleum tile on the floor. Observation on 06/09/25 at 12:40 P.M. revealed Resident #62's walls were damaged with holes behind her chair and to the side of the bed. Observation on 06/09/25 at 3:39 P.M. of Resident #49's room revealed a large hole in the wall behind her bedside table. Observation on 06/09/25 at 5:14 P.M. the wall behind Resident #23's electric wheelchair and the side wall were plastered and not painted. There were six broken linoleum tiles with pieces missing on the floor and the bathroom door had two holes in it. Interview on 06/11/25 at 4:22 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed she was aware of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and resident council meeting minute review the facility failed to provide preferred resident activities including community outings to residents in the facility. This affected two residents (#17 and #37) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Interview on 06/12/25 at 11:00 A.M. Resident #37 reported she would prefer to do her own shopping and would like to go on outings in the community. She went on to say the facility does not have a working vehicle to take her. Interview on 06/12/25 at 11:11 A.M. Resident #17 reported she never gets to go on outings and would, love to go shopping Stated has brought it up many times with the facility but it was not addressed. Review of the resident council meeting minutes for 05/01/25 revealed the residents wanted to discuss future outings. Review of the Activity Calendar from January 2025 to May 2025 revealed the facility did not have any activities scheduled for outside of the facility. Review of the June 2025 activity calendar revealed on 06/19/25 the facility had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication had a 14 day stop date. This affected one resident (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed a 05/28/21 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression, dementia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, difficulty in walking, osteoarthritis, insomnia, pain in right knee, lumbago with sciatica, muscle wasting and atrophy, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the 05/07/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making with disorganized thinking, that comes and goes, changes in severity. Physician orders included Compound: Ativan (Lorazepam) Gel Apply to skin topically two times a day for target behaviors: agitation, anxiety milligram (mg) per milliliter (ml), apply 0.5 ml to inner wrist and apply to wrist topically every 12 hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to clean a dependent resident's eyeglasses. This affected one resident (#23) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed a 09/30/21 admission and a 02/10/24 readmission. Diagnoses include type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular angioplasty with implants and grafts, Alzheimer's disease, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, abnormality of gait and mobility, muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia, vitamin D deficiency, osteoarthritis of left knee, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hypertension, anemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, cardiomegaly, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure, gastroesophageal heart disease, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, retention of urine, overactive bladder and history of pulmonary embolism,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility pharmacist failed to identify a psychotropic medication needed a 14 day stop date. This affected one resident (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed a 05/28/21 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression, dementia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, difficulty in walking, osteoarthritis, insomnia, pain in right knee, lumbago with sciatica, muscle wasting and atrophy, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the 05/07/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making with disorganized thinking, that comes and goes, changes in severity. Physician orders included Compound: Ativan (Lorazepam) Gel Apply to skin topically two times a day for target behaviors: agitation, anxiety milligram (mg) per milliliter (ml), apply 0.5 ml to inner wrist and apply to wrist topically every 12 hours as needed for target…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record. This affected one resident (#12) of one resident reviewed for edema. The census was 77. Findings included: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiparesis and hemiplegia, cerebral infarction, peripheral insufficiency, congestive heart failure, chronic ischemic heart disease, aphasia, high blood pressure, major depression, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. He required set up or clean up assistance for eating, oral hygiene, dependent for toileting, substantial/maximal assistance for bath/showering, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 03/18/25 to apply compression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication administration, and staff interview , the facility failed to ensure proper hand washing was completed during medication administration. This affected two residents (#50 and #57) of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: On 06/11/25 observation between 7:07 A.M. and 7:15 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #136 put on gloves and prepared medication for Resident #57, removed her gloves and put on new gloves without washing her hands and went in to the Resident #57's room and administered the medication, then removed her gloves and used hand sanitizer. LPN #136 then again put on new gloves, prepared medication for Resident #50, changed her gloves and went into the resident's room to administer medications. On 06/11/25 at 7:18 A.M. interview with LPN #136 verified she had not washed her hands between glove changes.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and safe living environment for residents. This affected one (#40) of three residents sampled and two additional residents (#6 and #67) identified during environmental tour. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction. Observation on 12/16/24 at 8:10 A.M. revealed Resident #40 was independently ambulating in his room. Resident #40's bathroom revealed a missing floor tile approximately 10 inch in length by four inches in width at the entrance of Resident #40's shower. Interview with Resident #40 at the time of the observation stated he showers in his room and the tile had been broken since he moved in. 2. Observation on 12/16/24 at 11:20 A.M. of the 500-hall central bath revealed two opened bags of soiled linens, including a towel protruding out of the top of the bag resting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #36) of four residents sampled for activities of daily living. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced right femur fracture, diabetes mellitus and unspecified dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was severely impaired for daily decision-making and was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Observation on 12/16/24 between 10:46 A.M. and 11:13 A.M. revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #100 was pushing a hoyer mechanical lift down the hall towards Resident #36's room. CNA #100 entered the room where CNA #101 was waiting to assist with incontinence care. CNA #100 stated her supplies were ready and motioned to the night stand next to the bed. There was a towel with two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the windows were kept in good repair. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 67. Findings included: Observation of the 200 Hall sunroom on 06/13/24 at 6:00 A.M. revealed the windows were streaked and dirty, on both sides of the glass. On the outside of the windows, build up of grass and debris were present. Three screens were torn. Observation of the 300 Hall sunroom on 06/13/24 at 6:04 A.M. revealed windows were cloudy and streaked, had dirt and debris on them. One window had a crack and one window was shattered with shards of glass missing and duct tape around the edges in attempt to hold the window together. Another window had a torn screen. Observation of the 400 Hall sunroom on 06/13/24 at 6:08 A.M. revealed windows were dirty and streaked with dirt and cobwebs on the outside of the windows. There were four torn screens. Observation of the 500 Hall sunroom on 06/13/24 at 6:11 A.M. revealed windows were dirty and streaked with two cracked windows and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of glucometer manufacturer information, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ensure glucometers used for multiple residents were cleaned/disinfected between resident use. This affected four residents (Residents #1, #4, #21, and #36) observed during medication administration. The facility identified 17 residents (Residents #1, #4, #21, #25, #28, #33, #34, #35, #36, #46, #50, #56, #61, #63, #64, #65, and #67) who had blood glucose levels monitored using facility glucometers. Findings include: 1. On 06/13/24 at 7:40 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #100 entered Resident #21's room to administer medication and monitor Resident #21's blood glucose level. RN #100 carried a basket with a glucometer, alcohol wipes, glucometer strips and lancets into Resident #21's room and placed the basket on the table without a barrier. Resident #21's blood glucose was monitored using the facility's glucometer. After using the glucometer it was placed back into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers per their preferences. This affected two (Resident #31 and #34) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) quarterly assessment completed on 03/14/24 revealed Resident #31's cognition remained intact and it was very important for him to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Review of a shower preference sheet completed on 05/01/24 revealed Resident #31 prefers showers but is okay with bed baths. Review of shower sheets revealed Resident #31 received showers on Tuesday and Friday nights. Resident #31 received a bed bath on 05/10/24, 05/14/24, 05/17/24, 05/21/24, 05/24/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain residents' personal living space in a comfortable, homelike manner. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and #62) of three residents interviewed for a homelike environment. The census was 67. Findings include: Interview on 06/12/24 at 1:34 P.M. with Ombudsman #100 revealed residents had been complaining since 02/29/24 that they wanted the windows cleaned but the windows haven't been cleaned and residents were also unhappy with the broken screens for the windows. Continuous interviews and observations with Maintenance Director (MD) on 06/13/24 at 8:26 A.M. revealed a company came in to give window estimates which would cost a fortune and since they were already renovating other things, no windows had been ordered yet. The MD stated he does have new screens for the building but has not had a chance to put them in yet. Interview on 06/13/24 at 8:35 A.M. with the Administrator revealed he was aware of some of the windows being in disrepair but the facility just spent a million dollars on a renovation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect 56 of 57 residents who received food from the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Observations on 03/18/24 from 7:03 P.M. to 7:18 P.M. during an initial tour of the kitchen revealed: one opened bag a macaroni noodles and one opened bag of bow tie pasta that were not dated, a Tupperware container of vanilla wafers that were not dated, two quarts of pears that were not dated, and a bag of shredded cheddar cheese was not dated. Additionally, the sanitizer water was tested, and the test strip did not change to the appropriate color. All findings were confirmed by Dietary Manager #128 and Regional Director of Operations #109 at the time of the observation. Observation of tray line for lunch on 03/20/24 revealed the following: -12:16 P.M. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #160 touched his ear then continued to plate noodles. -12:19 P.M. DM #128 coughed into his elbow, did not wash hands, then at 12:21 P.M. grabbed soup out of the steamer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly assessed for restraints. This affected one resident (#27) of two residents reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease without angina, atrial fibrillation, dementia with behaviors, psychosis, anxiety disorder, major depression, and aphasia. Review of orders revealed no order for body pillows to bilateral bed or restraints. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) completed on 03/09/24 revealed Resident #27 did not have restraints. Review of assessments revealed no device assessment had been completed related to bilateral body pillows. Review of a care plan dated 03/19/24 revealed Resident #27 had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to right wrist fracture with an intervention that included bilateral body pillows for comfort per resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate. This affected two residents (#21 and #26) of six reviewed for dental and one resident (#49) of two reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 57. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, anemia, benign paroxysmal vertigo, qualitative platelet defects. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have her own teeth and had partial upper and lower dentures. Review of Resident #21's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no loose or broken full or partial dentures and was edentulous. The resident's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was 15 out of 15 (cognition intact). Review of Resident #21's dental note from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #58's current plan of care revealed no evidence Resident #58 had a plan of care for anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder, behaviors, or refusal of care (showers). Observation on 03/18/24 at 8:00 P.M., revealed strong odors coming from Resident #58's room. Observation and interview on 03/19/24 at 9:30 A.M. with Resident #58, revealed Resident #58 had strong odors coming from his body. The resident voiced no concern regarding receiving assistance with activity of daily living care. The resident reported he needed to apologize to the two aides working last night because he read their body language wrong. The resident reported to the surveyor if he asked someone not to come in his room he means it. Interview on 03/21/24 at 9:46 A.M., with Regional Clinical Support (RCS) #199 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #15, #26, and #46 had quarterly care conferences in conjunction with minimum data sets and failed to revise care plans for Residents #21. This affected four residents (#15, #21, #26, and #46). The facility census was 57. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of minimum data set (MDS) list revealed Resident #15 had a quarterly MDS completed on 01/24/24. Review of assessments revealed Resident #15 had care conference meetings on 01/20/23, 05/02/23, 06/27/23, 09/29/23, and 03/05/24. There was no documentation of a care conference being completed between 09/29/23 and 03/05/24. Interview on 03/19/24 at 10:02 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed she had never been to a care conference. Interview on 03/20/24 at 3:25 P.M. with Social Worker Designee (SWD) #144 revealed care conference are offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based no medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). This affected three residents (Resident #27, #37, and #165) of four reviewed for ADL. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bronchitis, hypothyroidism, anemia, Parkinsonism, depression, gastro-esophageal reflux, and Alzheimer's. Review of Resident #165's general note dated 03/12/24 revealed the resident had all her own teeth. Review of Resident #165's functional abilities and goals dated 03/16/24 revealed the resident required some assistance (partial assistance from another to complete activities) for self-care needs. The resident was setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene. Review of Resident #165 oral/dental plan of care dated 03/13/24 revealed the resident had her own natural teeth. The intervention included coordinate arrangements for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure wounds were properly identified as healed. This affected one resident (#23) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had cognitive impairment and no skin concerns. A skin grid non-pressure form dated 01/10/24 at 11:53 A.M. revealed Resident #23 had a diabetic ulcer to the right foot planter surface below the fifth toe discovered on 01/10/24. The diabetic ulcer measured five centimeters (cm) long and two cm wide. The wound bed was covered with slough (yellow/white necrotic tissue). An order was received to paint the wound with betadine. A skin grid non-pressure form dated 02/07/24 at 10:45 A.M. reveled Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #15 with an optometry consult. This affected one resident (#15) of two residents reviewed for optometry services. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had moderately impaired vision. Review of care plan dated 02/02/24 revealed Resident #15 had moderately impaired vision and interventions included to arrange a consultation with eye care practitioner as required. Record review revealed no evidence of a visual consult consent form being completed for Resident #15. Review of 360Care vision lists from 03/06/23, 06/22/23, 08/02/23, and 09/28/23 revealed Resident #15 was not seen by the eye doctor. Interview on 03/19/24 at 10:06 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed she has a hard time seeing things far away and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving intervention were in-place. This affected one resident (#21) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 57. Finding included: Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, anemia, benign paroxysmal vertigo, qualitative platelet defects. Review of Resident #21's Braden Scale (predictor for pressure ulcers) dated 01/17/24 revealed not at risk for pressure. She had a potential problem for friction and shearing, mobility was slightly limited, walked occasionally, rarely moist. Review of Resident #21's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was 15 out of 15 (cognition intact). The resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcer/injuries. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure foot care was provided for a resident. This affected one resident (#32) out of four reviewed for activities of daily living. Facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic embolism and thrombosis, celiac disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, and adult failure to thrive. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. A podiatry consent form was signed on 02/08/24. Observation on 03/19/24 at 8:09 A.M. revealed Resident #32 had long toenails with several toenails curling under the toes. Interview on 03/19/24 at 3:29 P.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #129 verified Resident #32 had long, jagged toenails. RN #129 also verified the toenails to the second and third toe on Resident #32's left foot were curling under the toes. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide range of motion services for residents. This affected two residents (#1, #48) of four residents reviewed for range of motion services. Facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, epilepsy, and contracture of muscle-multiple sites. Range of motion assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had full loss of voluntary movement to foot and ankle. The observation comments revealed Resident #1 had diagnosis of quadriplegia and range of motion was not inhibited, but Resident #1 was not able to move own extremities himself. The Functional abilities and goals assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had functional limitations to both sides of upper extremity and lower extremity. Interview on 03/21/24 at 7:50 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #129 stated all residents were assessed quarterly for contracture's. RN #129 verified Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage of resident nebulizer equipment. This affected one resident (#58) of one reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #58's orders dated 02/12/24 revealed orders for Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution 1.25 milligram (mg)/3 milliliters (ml) inhale orally via nebulizer four times a day for shortness of breath. There was no evidence of orders on how frequently to change the tubing and mask. Review of Resident #58's COPD plan of care dated 02/16/24 revealed no evidence of storage or maintained of the nebulizer equipment. Observations on 03/19/24 at 9:34 A.M. of Resident #58's nebulizer equipment revealed the nebulizer mask was hanging off the dresser and not stored in a bag. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility failed to provide dental services to residents. This affected two residents (#26, #58) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 57. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, major depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of orders revealed Resident #26 had an order in place dated 10/16/21 to see audiologist, podiatrist, dentist, optometrist, and psychiatrist as needed. Review of a quarterly minimum data sets (MDS) dated [DATE] and 10/20/23 revealed Resident #15 had no difficulty chewing. Review of a care plan revised on 11/03/23 revealed Resident #26 had a care plan in place for being at risk for oral and dental health problems related to having her own natural teeth with some missing or broken, and reports of difficulty with chewing at times. Interventions included coordinate arrangements for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility contract, review of dental list, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dental services were offered timely. This affected three residents (#3, #15, and #58) of six reviewed for dental services. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including needing assistance with personal care, emphysema, COPD, dysphagia, heart failure, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #3's census revealed the resident primary insurance since 07/28/23 was Medicaid. Review of Resident #3's admission assessments dated 07/21/23 and 10/02/23 revealed no evidence the dental section was completed. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of Resident #3's oral/dental plan of care dated 08/04/23 revealed the resident had no upper teeth or dentures or partials. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, McGreer's criteria review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the criteria was met prior to antibiotics being administered. This affected one resident (#7) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] and 11/09/23 with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease, hyponatremia, hypothyroidism, above knee right amputation, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and rheumatoid arthritis, The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact and always incontinent of urine. A general note dated 03/15/24 at 3:26 P.M. revealed the certified nurse practitioner (CNP) reviewed the urine cultures and ordered Ceftriaxone (antibiotic) one gram intramuscular at bedtime for four days for a urinary tract infection. The CNP was notified Resident #7 did not meet the criteria for an antibiotic to be ordered. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the facility timeline for positive COVID-19 residents and staff, review of resident vaccination status, review of contact tracing, review of facility COVID-19 policies and procedures, review of the current Centers of Disease Control (CDC) Guidance Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes and interview the facility failed to implement adequate infection control measures including comprehensive contact tracing, proper personal protective equipment (PPE) use and implementation of transmission based precautions (TBP) following the identification of COVID-19 positive staff to prevent the spread of infection including COVID-19. This affected three residents (#20, #25 and #303) and had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observations of all residents completed during the survey period between 05/09/22 and 05/11/22 revealed no residents were in isolation/transmission based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #253 and Resident #254 received and signed the appropriate Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form. This affected two residents (#253 and #254) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #253's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of sepsis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle wasting and atrophy and type two diabetes. Resident #253 was discharged from receiving Medicare Part A services on 03/18/22 and remained in the facility. The facility provided the resident NOMNC for Hospice services. The resident signed the form on 03/16/22. However, record review revealed the resident was not receiving Hospice services and the form issued was incorrect. On 05/12/22 at 8:04 A.M. interview with Social Work (SW) #70 verified Resident #253 was not provided the correct NOMNC form. SW #70 reported the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of the anti-anxiety medication, Xanax prescribed for Resident #304. This affected one resident (#304) of one resident reviewed for abuse and misappropriation of funds/property. Findings include: Review of Resident #304's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/09/22. The resident was discharged on 02/25/22 to home with her family. Resident #304 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary edema, diabetes mellitus, Sjogren syndrome, fatty liver, major depressive disorder, obstructive sleep apnea and anxiety. Review of the physician's medication orders, revealed an order, dated 02/09/22 for Xanax 0.25 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. Review of the narcotic count sheet, dated 02/09/22 at 6:22 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #21 counted 50 Xanax tablets upon admission to the facility for the resident. Review of a self-reported incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documentation and interview the facility failed to ensure updated PASARR's were completed following changes in condition, including the identification of mental health diagnoses and psychoactive medications for Resident #12 and Resident #36. This affected two residents (#12 and #36) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed and admission date on 12/23/16. Resident #12 had diagnoses including psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (10/14/21), psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition (03/02/21) and major depressive disorder-recurrent severed with psychotic symptoms (03/02/21). Review of PASARR, dated 12/19/16 revealed the resident had no indications of any mental health diagnoses or use of any psychoactive medications. There were not any additional PASARR's included in Resident #12's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5, who was assessed to require staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care received adequate and timely nail care to promote optimal hygiene. This affected one resident (#5) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 10/12/13 with the latest readmission date of 03/31/22 and diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with right sided hemiplegia, congestive heart failure, benign neoplasm of right choroid, seasonal allergic rhinitis, history of COVID-19, dysphasia, metabolic encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, dysthymia, aphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety disorder. Review of the plan of care, dated 05/10/19 revealed the resident had an alteration in ADL performance/participation related to CVA with right hemiplegia, non-ambulatory, requiring a mechanical lift and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all residents received adequate care and treatment. The facility failed to monitor bowel movements for Resident #45, who had a history of constipation, failed to provide thromboembolism-deterrent (TED) hose as ordered for Resident #27 and failed to complete accurate skin assessments to monitor bruising for Resident #202. This affected three residents (#27, #45, and #202) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 05/08/17 and a readmission date of 10/26/21. Resident #45 had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, bipolar disorder, dysthymic disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, insomnia and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/27/22 revealed Resident #45 had mildly impaired cognition with Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedure and interview the facility failed to properly assess Resident #48's skin upon admission, timely identify a pressure area and implement a timely treatment to the pressure ulcer wound. This affected one resident (#48) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified two residents with pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Resident #48 had diagnoses including right above the knee amputation, seizure disorder, stage three chronic kidney disease and anemia. Review of the Self Functional Status assessment, dated 04/01/22 revealed Resident #48 was assessed as requiring extensive to dependent assistance from staff transfers and was non-ambulatory. An initial skin assessment performed on 04/01/22 at 5:11 P.M. was blank showing no evidence of skin impairment. A second skin assessment performed on 04/01/22 at 5:48 P.M. revealed the only skin impairment was an infected left great toenail. Review of the baseline plan of care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide supplements as ordered to Resident #44 who had experienced weight loss and was on hemodialysis. This affected one resident (#44) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute on chronic systolic heart failure, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension, major depressive disorder and acquired absence of left leg below knee. Review of the plan of care, dated 04/13/22 revealed Resident #44 had a nutritional problem or potential problem related to diagnoses of heart failure, end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, major depression, vitamin D deficiency, severe metabolic acidosis. The care plan revealed the resident had increased needs due to a wound requiring supplementation. Interventions included providing and serving supplements as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 and Resident #28 received the correct administration rate of oxygen as ordered. This affected two residents (#8 and #28) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and panlobular emphysema. Review of Resident #8's physician's orders, dated 01/08/22 revealed the resident was to receive oxygen at two liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. The order indicated the oxygen may be removed for care, ambulation or as needed. A plan of care, dated 04/22/22 addressed the resident's alteration in cardiac and respiratory function with an intervention to administer oxygen per orders. On 05/10/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments for Resident #44. This affected one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute on chronic systolic heart failure, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension, major depressive disorder and acquired absence of left leg below knee. Review of the care plan, dated 04/13/22 revealed Resident #44 needed hemodialysis related to end stage renal disease. Interventions included encouraging the resident to go to dialysis appointments, monitoring access port to right upper chest every shift, monitoring intake and output, monitoring vital signs as ordered, monitoring for signs of infection, monitor for new or worsening peripheral edema and working with the resident to relieve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to discontinue the medication Acidophilus for Resident #46 timely after a pharmacy recommendation/physician agreement was obtained related to the medication. This affected one resident (#46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date 08/24/18. Resident #46 had diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia, chronic kidney disease and vascular dementia. Review of a pharmacy recommendation, dated 09/09/21 revealed the pharmacist recommended a review of the vitamin supplement Acidophilus. The physician addressed the recommendation on 09/13/21 and documented agreement with the discontinuation of the Acidophilus. Review of the September 2021 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #46 revealed the Acidophilus was still given every day from 09/13/21 through 09/30/21. The October 2021 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #46 revealed the Acidophilus was still given every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate justification for the increase in the medication Depakote prescribed for Resident #51 for agitation related to bipolar disorder. This affected one resident (#51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/12/21 with the admitting diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, personal history of COVID-19, Alzheimer's disease, polyosteoarthritis, vitamin D deficiency, gastro-esophageal, bipolar disease, anemia, hyperparathyroidism, hypothyroidism and glaucoma. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/22/22 revealed the resident had clear speech, understood others, made himself understood and had a severe cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five of 15. The assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to maintain Resident #303's medical record in a complete and accurate manner related to documentation of oxygen rate of administration. This affected one resident (#303) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of Resident #303's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute congestive heart failure, pneumonia, other nonspecific abnormal findings of the lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and unspecified asthma. Review of Resident #303's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 04/27/22 to administer oxygen at 1.5 liters per minute (LPM) via a nasal cannula continuously every shift for congestive heart failure and pneumonia. A plan of care, dated 04/27/22 addressed the resident's altered cardiac status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with an intervention to administer oxygen via a nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-12 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of the facility job description, personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Director was qualified for the position. This had the potential to affect 77 out of 77 residents. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the facility Job Description for an Activity Director (AD) revealed the AD must be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is licensed by the state and is eligible for certification as a recreation specialist or as an activities professional; must have as a minimum two years' experience in a social or recreation program within the last five years one of which was full time in a patient activities program in a health care setting or must be qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or must have a training course approved by the state. AD #171 signed the job description on 10/02/24. Review of the personnel file for AD#171 revealed a hire date of 10/02/24. The personnel file revealed the AD's only activity experience was from May…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$44,060 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $44,060 — penalty dated 2024-03-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHM OH WEST OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/28/2021
OHIO CARE SKLD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/28/2021
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 6%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$294per resident / day
operating cost
$8,931per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366173. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next