Candlewood Healthcare And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 89.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, witness statement review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #64 and Resident #93 were free from incidents of physical abuse by Resident #50. This affected two residents (Resident #64 and #93) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Actual harm occurred on 09/24/24 when Resident #93 was physically abused/assaulted by Resident #50 resulting in an injury. At the time of the incident, Resident #50 punched, with a closed fist, Resident #93, unprovoked, resulting in Resident #93 experiencing pain rated a seven out of 10 (on a pain scale with 10 being the most severe pain), headache, distress with crying resulting in a transfer to the hospital emergency department where the resident was admitted to a trauma center for further evaluation and treatment and diagnosed with a nondisplaced right occipital bone fracture. As of 10/01/24 Resident #93 had not returned to the facility. Prior to this incident of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #96's resident fund account was dispersed timely following the resident's discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #96) of five residents reviewed for funds. The facility census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #96's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/06/25 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, paranoid schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Review of resident fund accounts revealed $767.94 (seven hundred sixty-seven dollars and ninety-four cents) was dispersed on 07/29/25 from Resident #96's resident fund account following the resident's discharge from the facility on 06/06/25. Interview on 07/30/25 at 12:18 P.M. with Regional Director of Operations #920 confirmed Resident #96's resident fund account monies were not dispersed within thirty days as required.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards to prevent cross contamination during tracheostomy (a tube in the opening of the trachea for breathing) care. This affected one (Resident #76) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 07/31/20 with diagnoses including brain damage, tracheostomy status and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #76 for July 2025 revealed staff were to change her inner cannula every day and as needed dated 02/28/25 and to change the tracheostomy ties every night shift and as needed dated 06/29/22. An observation was conducted on 07/29/25 at 12:12 P.M. of tracheostomy care to Resident #76 by Registered Nurse (RN) #868 with Assistant Director of Nursing/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #805 present during the observation. RN #868 washed her hands, put on a surgical mask, gown and gloves. Resident #76's tray table was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan with individualized interventions to support the behavioral health care needs of Resident #50, who had diagnoses of major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and psychosis. This affected one (Resident #50) of six residents reviewed for behavioral health care needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/23/23 with diagnoses of schizophrenia, dementia with psychotic disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, psychosis, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, generalized anxiety disorder and bilateral macular degeneration. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a staff-to-resident physical abuse allegation involving Resident #2 was reported to the Administrator. This affected one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 09/08/23 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, vascular dementia with mood disturbance, diabetes, gastrostomy, chronic heart failure, anxiety disorder, depression, psychosis and suicidal ideations. Review of the general note dated 04/15/24 revealed Resident #2 was alert and oriented times two and pleasant. He was able to make his needs known to staff. He utilized a Hoyer (mechanical lift) for transfers and two-person maximum assistance with all other activities of daily living. He was incontinent of bowel and bladder. He was NPO (nothing by mouth) and was tolerating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure kitchen employees were wearing beard guards while preparing and serving food, and failed to ensure drinks on resident meal trays were covered while carrying the trays through the hallways for delivery to the residents. This had the potential to affect all 94 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified four residents (#2, #32, #65, and #74) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/01/24 from 12:20 P.M. to 12:25 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #336 poured lemonade and fruit punch into plastic cups in an area around the nurse's station and then placed the cups of liquid back onto the meal trays in the covered food cart. STNA #336 then closed the door to the covered food cart and pushed it down the hall and placed the cart in the middle of the hall between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 111. STNA #336 then took Resident #95's meal tray out of the covered food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0800 — pattern
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, review of facility food production sheets and diet type report, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18, #28, #38, #63, #85 and #94 received the pureed main entree in the proper portion size, failed to ensure Residents #19, #44, #49, #50, #60, #76, #77, #86 and #89 received the appropriate main entree for their low sodium diets as ordered, and failed to ensure Residents #13, #17, #21, #23, #25, #26, #30, #34, #41, #87, #91, #53, #54, #67, #69, #72, #73 and #79 received fortified foods as ordered. This affected a total of 33 residents of 94 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified four residents (#2, #32, #65 and #74) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility food production sheet for lunch on 02/06/24 revealed residents on a puree diet were to receive two number eight scoops of pureed chili. Observation of the lunch tray line on 02/06/24 from 12:07 P.M. to 12:41 P.M. revealed residents who were on a puree diet received one number eight scoop of pureed chili…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, review of policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 and Resident #8 were free from physical abuse. This affected two residents (Resident #7 and #8) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/25/19 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, drug-induced subacute dyskinesia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, insomnia, vascular dementia without behavior disturbance, psychotic disturbance or mood disturbance, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness and abnormal gait. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/12/23 , revealed moderate cognitive deficit with a Brief Interview for Mental Status ( BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. Resident #8 had no physical or verbal behavior exhibited toward others, was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0800 — widespread
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food at the proper portion size to meet the residents' nutritional needs. This had the potential to affect 80 residents that received meals from the facility kitchen. Two (Resident's #56 and #58) of 82 residents received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Observation 09/20/22 at 5:10 P.M. of the dinner tray line revealed diced parsley potatoes were being served with a green #12 scoop which is equivalent to two and two thirds ounces (oz). The spreadsheet for 09/20/22's dinner meal called for four oz. Whole kernel corn was being served with a green #12 scoop which is equivalent to two and two thirds oz. The spreadsheet for 09/20/22's dinner meal called for four oz. Pureed mashed potatoes was being served with a green #12 scoop which is equivalent to two and two thirds oz. The spreadsheet for 09/20/22's dinner meal called for four oz. Cooked vegetables for mechanical soft diets were being served with a blue #16 scoop which is equivalent to two oz. The spreadsheet for 09/20/22's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-09-27 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to employ dietary staff who could demonstrate competence in how to properly run a low temperature dish machine. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen except for two (Resident's #56 and #58) who did not receive food by mouth. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Observation and interview on 09/19/22 at 11:15 A.M. revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #207 tested the low temperature dish machine. The strips she used did not get a reading, so she checked the chemicals which revealed the sanitizer and rinse aide were emptied. Observation on 09/19/22 at 11:18 A.M. DM #207 and Dietary Aide (DA) #210 went to the storeroom to get sanitizer and returned with rinse aide and three gallons of quat sanitizer. DA #210 stated that there was no sodium hypochlorite solution sanitizer. DM #207 walked away from the dish area. Observation and interview on 09/19/22 at 11:20 A.M. revealed DA #210 was pouring quat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility did not ensure food was served at palatable temperatures This had the potential to affect 80 residents that received meals from the facility kitchen. Two (Resident's #56 and #58) of 82 residents received nothing by mouth. Finding include: Interviews on 09/19/22 between 11:00 A.M. and 4:31 P.M. with Resident's #7 (second floor), #44 (third floor), and #79 (second floor) during the screening process of the annual survey revealed complaints about food taste and temperatures which lead to a test tray on 09/20/22. Observation on 09/20/22 at 4:31 P.M. with Corporate Food Service Manager (CFM) #208 revealed he calibrated the food thermometer to the best of his knowledge. Observation of the tray line on 09/20/22 at 5:00 P.M. revealed all hot food items on the steam table were over 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). There was no heat retention system being used in the kitchen to keep the food warm besides the steam table, thermal domes to cover the plates, and enclosed meal delivery carts. The food truck left the kitchen at 6:04 P.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,488 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $29,488 — penalty dated 2024-10-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH