No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Healthcare Of Shadyside

60583 State Route 7, Shadyside, OH 43947 · For profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (740) 676-8381 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 676-8381 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Resident-funds citation (F0569)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3801 Lincoln Ave · (740) 671-9357 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4595 SR 7 · (740) 676-2325 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4595 Central Ave · (740) 671-4010 · Call to confirm hours
Park
400 Alta Vista Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4100 Central Ave · (740) 676-2800

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.5%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.7%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury10.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.6%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.9%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.381.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.741.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
20.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 20.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.9%CMS range 49.0–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.5–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge20.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
41.2%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 81.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.62 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.53 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-22)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide a timely assessment and necessary and timely treatment for Resident 3181 following an unwitnessed fall with injury. This affected one resident (#181) of two residents reviewed for accident hazards. Actual harm occurred on 02/07/25 at 7:30 P.M. when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed Resident #181 on the floor in front of her wheelchair. The CNA notified Registered Nurse (RN) #109 of the resident having an unwitnessed fall; however, the RN failed to assess and provide needed treatment to the resident thereby delaying necessary treatment including transfer to the hospital. Following the incident, the resident complained of pain to her hip and had a decrease in mobility. However, the resident was not transferred to the emergency room until 02/09/25 at which time she was admitted for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8's bedroom furniture was maintained in a safe manner to prevent the resident from sustaining an injury when her foot hit the board as she was attempting to sit up. This affected one resident (#8) of two residents reviewed for edema. Actual harm occurred on 05/21/24 when Resident #8 required seven sutures to the top of her right foot as a result of her foot being cut on the footboard of her bed. Following the incident, the facility identified the footboard was in need of repair as it was torn and rough in texture. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type II diabetes. Review of a nursing note dated 05/21/24 at 3:48 A.M. revealed Resident #8 had cut her right foot on her footboard. Resident #8 reported she was trying to sit up and used her foot to push. The footboard was torn on the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate and timely respiratory care and treatment for Resident #2, related to a decline in the resident's respiratory status and need for oxygen use. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for edema. Actual harm occurred beginning on 03/10/25 when the facility failed to adequately and timely treat respiratory complications exhibited by Resident #2 which included shortness of breath, abnormal lung sounds and decreased oxygen saturation. On 03/11/25 staff had increased the resident's oxygen to seven liters (the resident had an order for oxygen at one to five liters at that time) with no additional intervention noted. On 03/14/25 at 11:45 P.M. Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital and admitted for a six day hospitalization for treatment of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia requiring intravenous antibiotics.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received refunds due to the residents within 30 days. This affected two residents (#1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for refunds. The facility census was 80. Findings include:1.Closed record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and osteoporosis. Review of a nursing note dated [DATE] at 8:54 A.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #123 revealed Resident #1 discharged from the facility to an assisted living facility. Review of an invoice dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was issued a check for $1565 on [DATE]. 2.Closed record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. Review of a nursing note dated [DATE] at 10:21 A.M. by LPN #200 revealed Resident #2 expired in the facility. Resident's physician, family and hospice were notified. Review of an invoice dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately reflect on the facility assessment the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff are available to meet each resident's needs as identified through resident assessments and care plans. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of a document titled Facility Assessment Tool, which was updated 02/13/26, revealed the facility would conduct, document, and review a facility wide assessment which included both the resident population and resources the facility needed to care for the residents at least annually. The facility average daily census was 83. The locked memory care unit had a 32 bed capacity, with an average daily census of 28. The facility identified care needs of the memory care unit as activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and fall risk, bowel and bladder, skin integrity, mental health and behavioral, medications, pain management, infection prevention and control, management of medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents dignity. This affected one resident (#25) of the memory care unit. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25, revealed an admission date of 08/06/22. Diagnoses included pneumonia; unspecified dementia, anemia; chronic vascular disorder of intestine; gastrointestinal hemorrhage; dysphagia; unspecified psychosis not due to a substance; delusional disorder; transient cerebral ischemic attack; hyperlipidemia; depression; anxiety disorder; unspecified disorder of vestibular function; atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris; gastro-esophageal reflux; muscle weakness; difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified; and unsteadiness on feet.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #25, dated 02/11/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 on a 0-15 scale. A BIMS score of 0 suggests severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had unclear speech,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, review of facility policies, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the privacy of personal health information for three residents (#7, #42, and #79) of 83 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses including chronic resp failure, chronic lung disease, morbid obesity, diabetes, bipolar disorder (mood disorder), right sided weakness following a stroke, high blood pressure, and poor circulation to legs. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed admission to facility on 11/23/22 for diagnoses including dementia (memory impairment) with mood disturbance, anemia (low blood count), constipation, insomnia (sleep disorder), depression, restless leg syndrome, and difficulty with walking. Observation on 03/04/26 between 9:53 A.M. and 10:30 A.M. revealed the facility's Nurse Practitioner (NP) #500 and registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to maintain the highest practicable psychosocial well-being of each resident when a resident was brought to the dining room in a hospital gown which was opened in the back or to assist the resident with breakfast in a reasonable time. This affected one resident (#25) of six residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25, revealed an admission date of 08/06/22. Diagnoses included pneumonia; unspecified dementia, anemia; chronic vascular disorder of intestine; gastrointestinal hemorrhage; dysphagia; unspecified psychosis not due to a substance; delusional disorder; transient cerebral ischemic attack; hyperlipidemia; depression; anxiety disorder; unspecified disorder of vestibular function; atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris; gastro-esophageal reflux; muscle weakness; difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified; and unsteadiness on feet.Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from risk of infection by allowing a dog to be at the lunch table with residents eating their meal. This affected two residents (#77, #65) sitting together in the memory care dining area at lunchtime. The facility census was 83.Findings include:On 03/04/26 at 12:00 P.M., observation of the dining area of the memory care unit revealed a small table with Resident #77 and Resident #65 seated. Each resident had a visitor also sitting at the table. The visitor for Resident #77 was holding a small dog, who would lay it's head on the table. When the lunch tray for Resident #77 arrived, the visitor holding the dog did not wash her hands and continued holding the dog, while feeding Resident #77 her lunch. This was confirmed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #384 on 03/04/26 at 1:00 P.M.On 03/04/26 at 1:00 P.M., an interview with LPN #384 confirmed the visitor for Resident #77 was holding the dog and feeding the resident. She confirmed the visitor had been there prior to lunch and had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics usage met criteria. This affected four residents (#7, #28, #51, and #54) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and liver disease. On 04/05/25 the resident reported having pain in upper left side ribcage area. The physician was notified and ordered a chest x-ray. The x-ray result indicated an increase in left basilar infiltrates (from previous x-ray completed 01/14/25) and pleural effusion was noted. On 04/07/25 the physician was notified of x-ray results and ordered Omnicef (antibiotic) 300 milligrams (mg) twice daily for seven days as well as DuoNeb four times daily for seven days. The physician was aware the resident didn't meet McGeer's criteria and no new orders given. There was no documented evidence of why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to notify the resident representative of an unwitnessed fall that resulted in the resident's injury. This affected one resident (#181) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #181 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] on hospice services with a facility discharge date of 02/09/25. The resident's diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, malignant neoplasm of the bronchus or lung and repeated falls. Review of the baseline care plan dated 02/08/25 revealed Resident #181 was at risk for elopement/wandering related to dementia, at risk for falls and potential injury related to history, psychoactive medication required due to alteration in mood and behavior related to anxiety and wandering without purpose. Interventions included to have commonly used articles within easy reach,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dialysis dietary recommendation to administer protein snack at night was implemented and failed to ensure meal intakes were adequately monitored and documented. This affected two residents (#44 and #51) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with end stage renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, heart failure, diabetes, and liver disease. Review of Resident #51's dialysis plan of care dated 02/21/25 and revised 03/20/25 revealed the resident dialysis days were Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 10:30 A.M. There was no evidence to provide a protein snack at night. Review of Resident #51's plan of care for compromised nutritional status dated 02/21/25 revealed to offer increased protein in the diet. There was no evidence to offer a protein snack at night. Review of dialysis nutrition note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dialysis orders to hold medications were clarified and implemented. This affected one resident (#51) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with end stage renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, heart failure, diabetes, and liver disease. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 02/20/25. Review of Resident #51's dialysis plan of care dated 02/21/25 and revised 03/20/25 revealed the resident dialysis days were Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 10:30 A.M. There was no evidence to hold medication on dialysis days. Review of Resident #51's orders dated 02/08/25 to 04/16/25 revealed no evidence to hold medication on dialysis days. Review of Resident #51's medication administration record (MAR) dated 02/08/25 to 04/16/25 revealed in February (2025) staff held A.M. medication on dialysis three of four days, in March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were reconciled correctly on admission. This affected one resident (#181) of one resident reviewed for psych/opioid medication review. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record review for Resident #181 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] under hospice services and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses include senile degeneration of the brain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, malignant neoplasm of the bronchus or lung and repeated falls. Review of the baseline care plan dated 02/08/25 revealed Resident #181 was at risk of injury related to smoking, at risk for elopement/wandering related to dementia, at risk for falls and potential injury related to history, psychoactive medication required due to alteration in mood and behavior related to anxiety and wandering without purpose. Intervention included to have commonly used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of operational manual, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a pressure relieving air mattress was accurately set per the resident's weight and maintained per the manufacturer's guidelines. This affected one resident (#34) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) (purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear. The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue), peripheral vascular disease, anemia, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, hemiplegia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and diabetes. Review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for COVID-19 positive residents, performed hand hygiene and disposed of sharps appropriately, and failed to ensure the disinfectant wipes outside of COVID-19 isolation rooms was not expired. Staff not wearing the appropriate PPE and the expired disinfectant wipes had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility who had not tested positive for COVID-19. The hand hygiene concern affected Resident #233 and the improper disposal of sharps had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69. Findings included: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 9:00 A.M. upon entrance into the facility revealed signage on the entrance door reading Please be aware that (Facility Name) is currently in Outbreak due to Positive staff/residents which informed those who enter the building that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of liability notices, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate notice prior to the end of their Medicare (MCR) Part A services and residents that opted to receive those services continued to receive them while MCR was billed for an official decision on payment. This affected two residents (#1 and #48) of three residents reviewed for liability notices. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, dementia with a mood disturbance, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Her diagnoses list was updated n 05/01/23 to reflect she had a below the knee amputation of the right leg. A review of Resident #1's Notice of MCR Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revealed her skilled services ended on 05/24/23. The resident received the notice on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were being transferred to the local emergency room for care received a copy of the bed hold notice. This affected two residents (#24 and #66) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 69. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage three, acute and chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, weakness, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/25/23, revealed she was cognitively intact and had active diseases of chronic kidney disease, stage three and heart failure. Review of Resident #24's progress note dated, 08/01/23 at 1:30 P.M., revealed her daughter was called and updated on her mother being sent to the emergency room for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected three residents (#44, Resident #9, and Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 69. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteomyelitis, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/01/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses of dementia, depression and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #44's PASARR document, dated 10/27/22, revealed under Section E, there were no diagnoses listed. Review of the resident's diagnoses list revealed bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder were added on 01/24/20. During interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance needed with the removal of unwanted facial hair. This affected one resident (#48) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: A review of Resident #48's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, dementia with agitation, depression, anxiety disorder, difficulty walking, weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of Resident #48's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. She was not known to have rejected any care during the seven days of the assessment period. She required an extensive assist of one for transfers and personal hygiene and was totally dependent on one for bathing. A review of Resident #48's care plans revealed she had a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32's constipation was treated timely. This affected one resident (#32) of two residents reviewed for constipation. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the cervical vertebra, fracture of the right femur, dementia, and interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/08/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS assessment revealed the resident required extensive, two-person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the Care Plan, dated 03/13/23, revealed the resident was at risk for pain with interventions including to monitor/document for side effects of pain medications and to observe for constipation and to report occurrences to the physician. Review of a physician order, dated 03/01/23, revealed the order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly store Resident #19's nebulizer machine, tubing, and mouthpiece and failed to ensure Resident #31 received the correct dosage of oxygen as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#19 and #31) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including myocardial infarction, dementia, obesity, and weakness. Review of Resident #19's physician orders, dated 02/27/23, revealed the order for ipratropium-albuterol solution 0.5-2.5 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (ml), inhale orally every four hours as needed for shortness of breath via nebulizer. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2023, revealed the resident was administered the nebulizer treatment on 09/16/23. Observation on 09/18/23 at 12:26 P.M., revealed Resident #19 lying in bed with her eyes closed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the dialysis contract, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were completed by the facility and the dialysis center to maintain good communication of the resident's condition and services rendered during dialysis treatments. This affected one resident (#1) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis treatments. Findings include: A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD) and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed she received dialysis treatments every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. That order had been in place since 05/09/23. A review of Resident #1's care plans revealed she had a care plan in place for receiving dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday related to ESRD. The interventions included checking for new orders upon the resident's return from dialysis and maintaining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications. This affected two residents (#11 and #15) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, sepsis due to Escherichia coli, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, intra-abdominal lymph nodes, essential (primary) hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, sleep apnea, insomnia, and overactive bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment from 08/21/23 also revealed Resident #11 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx present on admission and experienced frequent bowel incontinence. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by Resident #73, a resident with a known history of aggressive behaviors. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse from State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #300. This affected six residents (#44, #53, #75, #76, #77, and #78) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 73. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an initial admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hallucinations, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance of known physiological condition, manic disorder, insomnia, cognitive disorder. On 05/12/23 intermittent explosive disorder diagnosis was added. Review of Resident #73's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and policy review, the facility failed to report physical abuse to the state agency. This affected four residents (#44, #53, #73, #75). Findings included: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an initial admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hallucinations, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance of known physiological condition, manic disorder, insomnia, cognitive disorder. On 05/12/23 intermittent explosive disorder diagnosis was added. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognition impairment and was rarely/never understood. His cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired and his decisions were poor and he required supervision and cues. He had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and policy review, the facility failed to have evidence that allegations of physical abuse was thoroughly investigated. This affected four residents (#44, #53, #73, #75). Findings included: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an initial admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hallucinations, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance of known physiological condition, manic disorder, insomnia, cognitive disorder. On 05/12/23 intermittent explosive disorder diagnosis was added. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognition impairment and was rarely/never understood. His cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired and his decisions were poor and he required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately supervised to assist in the prevention of resident to resident altercations. This affected one resident (#73) of three residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an initial admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hallucinations, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance of known physiological condition, manic disorder, insomnia, cognitive disorder. On 05/12/23 the diagnosis of intermittent explosive disorder was added. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/13/23 revealed the resident had severe cognition impairment and was rarely/never understood. His cognitive skills for daily decision making was moderately impaired and his decisions were poor and required supervision and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to reimburse Resident #70 's funds to her family within 30 days of her death. This affected one resident (#70) out of three residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted into the memory care unit at the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, right arm fracture, weakness, depression, and high blood pressure. Resident #70 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #70's invoice for services and room and board dated [DATE] revealed balance due of $2,400.00. Review of Resident #70's credit card statement from Capital One dated [DATE] revealed a credit card payment made to the facility dated [DATE] for $2,400.00. Review of Resident #70 accounts receivable adjustment request dated [DATE] revealed the facility requested a pro-rated patient liability adjustment due to Resident #70 expiring on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of nursing staff to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected seven residents (#13, #14, #50, #162, #48, #55 and #165) and had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed diagnoses including low back pain, anxiety disorder, and generalized muscle weakness. A care plan initiated 01/21/20 addressed Resident #50's personal preferences. Interventions included honoring Resident #50's activity of daily living preferences as able and indicated Resident #50's preferred time to rise was 6:30 A.M. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/10/21 indicated Resident #50 was cognitively intact. Resident #50 required extensive assistance from staff for transfers, walking in the room, personal hygiene and dressing. On 10/18/21 at 2:42 P.M. interview with Resident #50 revealed she preferred to rise on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-10-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of department head schedules and interview the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing only served as a charge nurse when the census was 60 residents or fewer. This affected all 68 residents. Findings include: On 10/21/21 at 10:15 A.M. review of department head schedules from 09/19/21 to 10/21/21 with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the previous DON, (DON #171) was scheduled to work as a charge nurse on 09/19/21 from 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. The current DON revealed she took over the position of DON on 10/08/21. On 10/11/21 she worked as a charge nurse on day shift from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. The census on 09/19/21 was 63. The census on 10/11/21 was 62.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident preferences for bathing and/or rising time were honored. This affected five residents (#13, #14, #50, #55 and #165) of 11 residents interviewed regarding choices and one additional resident (Resident #48). The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed diagnoses including paralysis and weakness on one side of the body following a stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, generalized muscle weakness, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis. A care plan initiated 10/10/19 indicated Resident #13 had an alteration in performance of activities of daily living related to impaired mobility, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and COPD. Interventions included use of a Hoyer lift for transfers and indicated Resident #13 preferred three showers a week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and as necessary. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility admission Guidance review and interview the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices, including the proper use, cleaning and disposal of personal protective equipment when entering the room of a resident (Resident #214) who was in quarantine for COVID-19 precautions to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 36 residents (#3, #4, #7, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #28, #35, #36, #39, #42, #43, #48, #49, #50, #54, #55, #57, #58, #162, #163, #164, #165, #166, #213, #214 and #215) who resided on the East Hall. The facility census was 68 Findings include: Review of Resident #214's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was on droplet precautions, designed to reduce the risk of droplet transmission of infectious agents, for 14 days related to COVID -19 precautions due to the resident not being vaccinated. On 10/19/21 at 4:30 P.M. observation of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedure and interview the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of Resident #55's property from loss or theft and ensure timely follow up regarding missing/lost items. This affected one resident (#55) of two residents reviewed for missing property. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder and depression. Review of the 10/08/21 annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, required supervision for toilet use and personal hygiene, required one person assist for bed mobility, transfers and dressings, required supervision set up for eating and was dependent on one staff for bathing. Interview on 10/18/21 at 4:07 P.M. with Resident #55 revealed she had lost a white furry jacket (date not provided) with her name in it. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #53 and Resident #55 and/or their responsible parties were notified timely and invited to participate in quarterly care conferences. This affected two residents (#53 and #55) of four residents reviewed for care planning conferences. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder and depression. Record review revealed the resident had a court appointed guardian. Review of the 10/08/21 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, required supervision for toilet use and personal hygiene, required one person assist for bed mobility, transfers and dressings, and required supervision set up for eating and was dependent on one staff for bathing. On 10/18/21 at 4:10 P.M. interview with the resident revealed the resident did not recall being in a meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 received oxygen therapy as ordered. This affected one resident (#25) of three residents reviewed who had orders for oxygen. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stroke which affected his speech and swallowing receiving feeding through a tube in his stomach, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypoxia due to aspiration. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order, dated 08/05/21 to provide two liters of oxygen as needed when short of breath (SOB). Review of the 09/08/21 Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #25 was alert and oriented, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care and was transferred utilizing a mechanical lift. On 10/18/21 at 11:00 A.M. Resident #25 was observed receiving oxygen set at five liters via nasal cannula. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were prescribed based on culture and sensitivity results to ensure appropriate antibiotic use. This affected two residents (#6 and #47) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/20/20 with a diagnosis that included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A nurse's progress note, dated 01/10/21 revealed staff identified foul smelling urine and informed the physician who ordered a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity (lab test to determine urinary tract infection (UTI) and appropriate medication to treat). The urinalysis was obtained on 01/14/21 and culture and sensitivity results were completed and returned to the facility on [DATE], which indicated Resident #6 had a UTI with morganella morganii as the organism and to avoid 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins. Review of physician's orders indicated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CERTUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHM OH WEST OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/28/2021
OHIO CARE SKLD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/28/2021
DIPASQUA, JASONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021
FISHMAN, SHMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 8%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$256per resident / day
operating cost
$7,774per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366285. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next